Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
Home Help Search Login Register Broadcast Message to Admin(s)


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15
Send Topic Print
the stones to play again(update: tour now in 2013) (Read 60,620 times)
Pdog
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 6,123
aTx
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #75 - Nov 19th, 2011 at 7:06am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
luxury wrote on Nov 19th, 2011 at 5:46am:
i saw Mick t. a couple years ago and his playing was fantastic.  Very next night he "got sick" and cancelled the remaining dates!!  Guy does seem to have issues...

Keith is working the PR machine big-time.  I think he's attempting to show Mick he can handle some of the "responsibility" of getting something going for the 50th.  It's never too late.  this is gonna be great



let's hope this could be good for mich t. as well as us fans... it would be special, but it could also be pathetic, if they trot him out and it's awkward b/c he's not taking care of himself... This is a really great oppurtunity for healing on so many levels, and the band to really shine.
I have to wonder, if they can get Wyman back to tour, and I nkow it's a stretch... would they go Steel Wheels part two for him, and ditch the jets for trains... they could easily, since they all need days off, especially Jaggers, who can't do back to backs anymore. DJ on bass has been ok, but we all know Bill has some depth and style that no one can duplicate. Especially if they record... Being able to really listen over the years of the catalog, I can hear how much he mattered... When he left, that bottom end just didn't ever have that punch and deepness he can bring... Let's go Amtrak or whatever trains are called!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sweetcharmedlife
Agent Provocateur
*****
Offline


Do the horrendous to that
if you can

Posts: 11,934
San Mateo
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #76 - Nov 19th, 2011 at 2:43pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
dadrob wrote on Nov 18th, 2011 at 2:55pm:
in the video for Brussels KR talks about how hot the band is....why wouldn't he want access to those players again?

Because that was almost 40 years ago and their is no guarantee they can sound like that again.
Back to top
 

I'll shoot it to you straight and look you in the eye
So gimme just a minute and I'll tell you why
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Online


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,228
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #77 - Nov 19th, 2011 at 2:53pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Pdog wrote on Nov 19th, 2011 at 7:06am:
  I have to wonder, if they can get Wyman back to tour, and I nkow it's a stretch... would they go Steel Wheels part two for him, and ditch the jets for trains... they could easily, since they all need days off, especially Jaggers, who can't do back to backs anymore. DJ on bass has been ok, but we all know Bill has some depth and style that no one can duplicate. Especially if they record... Being able to really listen over the years of the catalog, I can hear how much he mattered... When he left, that bottom end just didn't ever have that punch and deepness he can bring... Let's go Amtrak or whatever trains are called!!!



Thats simply more hassle than its worth for the whole band. Bill included.

Its also not going to make any significant difference in ticket sales.

Two decades on and in his mid 70s, Bill just isnt going to become suddenly interested on trekking around the world with the Stones again.
Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
Ian Billen
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 1,562
USA
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #78 - Nov 23rd, 2011 at 4:52pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Although this isn't exactly late breaking news but now the thought is actually getting "serious":

INCREDIBLY ... Bill Wyman is actually seriously thinking about touring with The Stones again as has been the talk!!!! As well, they are contemplating the notion as well. Mick Taylor is also in serious considerations...


Keith wants a full scale tour and is wanting to write with Mick for new material to go along with it . More-over with material he has been saving/working on was/is for a possible Winos tour.

**Realistically... where on earth would a Winos release, and full recording fit in?? I mean.. it's getting awful late for a Winos thing because ya can't have that released right before a major Stones doing next year. It would be pretty counter-productive. Besdies... once they all get together, I doubt they will break to go onto other side projects. It is getting toward the end of the year and there are time constraints... they all know that. Again... my guess is they are going to make an album or release "something" brand new studio wise in one way or another for this ordeal. The notion everyone always seems to have about them having no interest in writing and recording together anymore is bullocks. In fact, that is very much an option on the table right now.


From Rolling Stone Magazine today:

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/stones-near-decision-on-50th-anniversary-...


Ian
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 23rd, 2011 at 4:55pm by Ian Billen »  

Thought you were dinner  ...but you were the shark ..
 
IP Logged
 
lavendar
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,074
Buffalo,NY
Gender: female
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #79 - Nov 23rd, 2011 at 5:27pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
WORK IT OUT DHARLINS'

GiVing Thanks
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 23rd, 2011 at 5:28pm by lavendar »  
 
IP Logged
 
Heart Of Stone
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 4,001
Charlottetown Prince Edward Is
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #80 - Nov 23rd, 2011 at 6:01pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Sorry If this has already been posted.

Stones Near Decision on 50th Anniversary Shows
Tour could be the biggest of all time – but do Mick and Keith want to do it?
Comment 8
By Patrick Doyle
November 23, 2011 11:30 AM ET
...
Keith Richards and Mick Jagger perform during the 'A Bigger Bang' world tour.

Dave Hogan/Getty Images

Mick Jagger and Keith Richards will meet in December to decide how the Rolling Stones will celebrate next year's 50th anniversary, according to a top tour-industry source. "I don't see why in the world the Stones can't put together some kind of show next year," says Richards. "I'd almost count on it. It doesn't have to be the whole spectacle bullshit again, but we've got to find our own way through this."

"It is quite amazing when you think about it," Jagger adds. "Anything's possible."

A top source tells Rolling Stone that AEG Live, Live Nation and veteran Stones promoter Michael Cohl have already reached out about acquiring the band's anniversary tour, which has the potential to be the biggest of all time. "It would be a total home run," says the source.

The rock world is paying attention: "The Stones are iconic figures in Western society," says Sting. "I hope they'll stop bickering. I'd like to see them doing what they do." Adds Joe Perry, "I would love to see them just go and do arenas and have it be as stripped-down as possible, the way they did on the Exile tour – where they had the horn section and Ian Stewart playing keyboards. As close as they could get to that would be great."

Following a band meeting in September at the Stones' London office, Richards, guitarist Ronnie Wood and drummer Charlie Watts were set to convene in November to jam in London. "I would suggest a lot of blues in the beginning," says Richards. "That's where the band's roots are. We'll start playing some Jimmy Reed stuff and some Muddy Waters stuff and then things will blossom from there. It might bore Mick to death – and that's the idea. We're just going to go, and you start from Day One. You've got the drums and a couple of guitars and you start hammering away.

"Mick is welcome," Richards adds. "I'm sure he'll turn up."

Richards' nasty, gossip-packed 2010 memoir, Life, painted an unrelentingly negative portrait of Jagger and his contributions to the Stones – straining the duo's relationship. "I think there's a healing process waiting to take place," Wood says. "I think it's happening now as we speak, but it has to be resolved. Something has to be resolved there. They have to come to terms with going on a working basis, which Charlie and I will help make happen. Wish me luck."

"That old healing process," says Stones saxophone player Bobby Keys with a laugh. "Boy, that is an ongoing process. But last time I was onstage with them, there was no blood lost. They always seem to work it out." Adds longtime friend Peter Wolf, "If one looks at the history of great collaborations, Gilbert and Sullivan didn't always have a good time at it, either. But once they choose to get together to work, that is usually the great healer."

Richards says he's up for another massive world stadium and arena run like 2005's Bigger Bang tour, but isn't sure Jagger wants to make such a large commitment. "I don't know about that," Richards says. "I don't think Mick would. We'd like to be ready to be able to do it if the idea starts to happen. I'd even invite Bill Wyman and Mick Taylor back in. Why not? It's 50 years. Everyone deserves a party."

Adds Jagger, "That'd be very complete if it all happened." Taylor and Wyman have both worked with the Stones recently: Taylor, who left the band in 1974 to pursue a solo career, contributed new guitar work on last year's Exile on Main St. box set, and Wyman, who departed in 1992, plays bass on a cover of Bob Dylan's "Watching the River Flow" that the band recorded for a 2011 tribute album to late keyboard player Ian Stewart. "I've been reading about the possibilities in the press, but Keith hasn't turned his lips in my direction yet," says Wyman. "Let's see what transpires over the next few weeks, and I can then make a serious decision. I've got my chops together, and I know that my mate Charlie has – so let's see if it ever happens."

One option some insiders floated has the band camping out for multinight runs in major cities. "I think the idea of doing multiple shows in certain cities – New York, L.A., maybe Chicago, maybe Atlanta – would be wonderful," says longtime keyboardist Chuck Leavell. Bobby Keys agrees: "In my fantasy of Rolling Stones gigs, I would like to see a gig that's centralized in one place: Let the people come to us instead of making all that traveling. That's always the main thing that bothers me about going on the road. It didn't used to, but hell, now we're all in our late sixties and shit, and it's just kind of a pain in the ass."

For its 40th anniversary in 2002, the band launched the massive Licks Tour, playing stadiums, arenas and small venues (sometimes all in the same city) and releasing a career retrospective with new songs. But this time around, there is no sign of new material. "I'm not writing for them right now," says Richards, who has been working on a solo project "reminiscent of early Chess records." "I'm cutting my own stuff with [producer and drummer] Steve Jordan," he says. "There's no point in writing for the Stones until I know that Mick Jagger's in. He could have every song I've ever written. They're all for him. If he doesn't like them – or if he poo-poos them – I take them somewhere else." Adds Wood, "I think we have so much back catalog that we would go out without new material, but then again one of the boys might go, 'No, I wouldn't dream of going out unless we have new material. I don't mind, really.'"

The band last played live together in August 2007 at London's O2 Arena, wrapping the two-year, $558 million Bigger Bang tour. "We were riding the top of the wave," says Wood. "I didn't want it to end." Since then, the Stones have been unusually busy: Jagger released an album with reggae-soul supergroup SuperHeavy; Richards published the bestselling Life; Watts toured with his longtime jazz group; and Wood released a solo album, exhibited paintings and hosted a U.K. classic-rock radio show. In between, the group went back into the studio to add new parts to outtakes included with the stellar Exile and Some Girls reissues.

For Jagger, probably the least-nostalgic Stone, the looming anniversary has him reflecting on just how far the band has come. "It's a very different group than the one that played 50 years ago," he says. "When I think about it, one part of me goes, 'We're slightly cheating,' because it's not the same band – still the same name, but it's only Keith and myself that are the same people, I think. I've tried to find out when Charlie's first gig was [but can't]. But it's an amazing achievement. It's fantastic and I'm very proud of it."

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/stones-near-decision-on-50th-anniversary-...
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/stones-near-decision-on-50th-anniversary-...
Back to top
 

The Rolling Stones ain't just a group, their a way of life-Andrew Loog Oldham.
......[URL=http://s6.photobucket.com/user/merrillm123/media/69inLA.jpg.html]
WWW Merrill Moran  
IP Logged
 
Mel Belli
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,298
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #81 - Nov 27th, 2011 at 2:57pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
I'm beginning to think the idea of Taylor and Wyman making at least select appearances next year is not so crazy. It's been mentioned by Keith more than once now, and even Mick seems to entertain it.
Back to top
 

fka Sandrew (a proud Rocks Off member since November 2001)&&&&"The Rolling Stones don't want any money ... so I'll keep it." - Melvin Belli, "Gimme Shelter"&&&&"We act so greedy, makes me sick sick sick."&&&&...
 
IP Logged
 
sweetcharmedlife
Agent Provocateur
*****
Offline


Do the horrendous to that
if you can

Posts: 11,934
San Mateo
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #82 - Nov 27th, 2011 at 3:11pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Mel Belli wrote on Nov 27th, 2011 at 2:57pm:
I'm beginning to think the idea of Taylor and Wyman making at least select appearances next year is not so crazy. It's been mentioned by Keith more than once now, and even Mick seems to entertain it.

Well with Taylor set to write his own book soon. Not so sure how welcome he'd be after all.
Back to top
 

I'll shoot it to you straight and look you in the eye
So gimme just a minute and I'll tell you why
 
IP Logged
 
Mel Belli
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,298
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #83 - Nov 27th, 2011 at 3:17pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
sweetcharmedlife wrote on Nov 27th, 2011 at 3:11pm:
Mel Belli wrote on Nov 27th, 2011 at 2:57pm:
I'm beginning to think the idea of Taylor and Wyman making at least select appearances next year is not so crazy. It's been mentioned by Keith more than once now, and even Mick seems to entertain it.

Well with Taylor set to write his own book soon. Not so sure how welcome he'd be after all.


If he writes books at the same pace that he releases studio albums ...
Back to top
 

fka Sandrew (a proud Rocks Off member since November 2001)&&&&"The Rolling Stones don't want any money ... so I'll keep it." - Melvin Belli, "Gimme Shelter"&&&&"We act so greedy, makes me sick sick sick."&&&&...
 
IP Logged
 
Ian Billen
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 1,562
USA
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #84 - Nov 27th, 2011 at 9:40pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Gazza wrote on Nov 19th, 2011 at 2:53pm:
Pdog wrote on Nov 19th, 2011 at 7:06am:
 I have to wonder, if they can get Wyman back to tour, and I nkow it's a stretch... would they go Steel Wheels part two for him, and ditch the jets for trains... they could easily, since they all need days off, especially Jaggers, who can't do back to backs anymore. DJ on bass has been ok, but we all know Bill has some depth and style that no one can duplicate. Especially if they record... Being able to really listen over the years of the catalog, I can hear how much he mattered... When he left, that bottom end just didn't ever have that punch and deepness he can bring... Let's go Amtrak or whatever trains are called!!!



Thats simply more hassle than its worth for the whole band. Bill included.

Its also not going to make any significant difference in ticket sales.

Two decades on and in his mid 70s, Bill just isnt going to become suddenly interested on trekking around the world with the Stones again.


_______________________________________________________

If this were five weeks ago I'd totally agree with you. However... if these reports of Wyman being some how on board and Wyman's and Keith/Micks comments on how they would entertain thinking about it and Wyman INCREDIBLY saying in so many words... all they have to do is ask... I gotta say, him recording, or playing in concert with The Rolling Stones is not so far off. The thought and odds of him on a wold tour is still minimal in my mind as well. Still... something could very well be in the making.. wow

>>>> Could it be that is why Keith and The Stones chose London to get together?? Do they have Bill in mind as a possibility?? It isn't a total stretch and it is something I never thought would be seriously considered by Wyman again... which it seems is..

Very much waiting to see what is up -


Ian



Back to top
 

Thought you were dinner  ...but you were the shark ..
 
IP Logged
 
Holden
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,271
Tampa Bay
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #85 - Nov 28th, 2011 at 11:10am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Mel Belli wrote on Nov 27th, 2011 at 2:57pm:
I'm beginning to think the idea of Taylor and Wyman making at least select appearances next year is not so crazy. It's been mentioned by Keith more than once now, and even Mick seems to entertain it.


I agree. 50 years is incredible and I'm sure they'd want to do SOMETHING very special, especially since it will probably be the last time. I'd guess  they do a filmed performance with all the past Stones (if they're up for it) making an appearance as well as bunch of people they've played with and their influences who are still living. I see something very similar to what the Rock n' Roll hall of fame did in MSG.
Back to top
 

...
mrhipfl  
IP Logged
 
Mel Belli
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,298
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #86 - Nov 28th, 2011 at 11:38am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Holden wrote on Nov 28th, 2011 at 11:10am:
[ see something very similar to what the Rock n' Roll hall of fame did in MSG.


You might be onto something.

I think there will be a "tour" of some sort, but there will be some kind of extravaganza—a 10-night stand, with an assortment of special guests, etc.—that anchors the whole thing.
Back to top
 

fka Sandrew (a proud Rocks Off member since November 2001)&&&&"The Rolling Stones don't want any money ... so I'll keep it." - Melvin Belli, "Gimme Shelter"&&&&"We act so greedy, makes me sick sick sick."&&&&...
 
IP Logged
 
ijwthstd
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,049
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #87 - Nov 28th, 2011 at 12:26pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
nankerphelge wrote on Nov 11th, 2011 at 6:00pm:
"Hopefully they won't play Sympathy at all "

A mind is a terrible thing to waste



So is a setlist slot for a once great song.
Back to top
 

"I went and saw Chickenfoot twice. I've suffered for being Sammy's friend" - Bob Forrest.&&&&http://www.soundcloud.com/thesameoldsauce
TotallyRandomDan  
IP Logged
 
Ian Billen
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 1,562
USA
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #88 - Dec 2nd, 2011 at 12:01am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Pdog wrote on Nov 19th, 2011 at 7:06am:
luxury wrote on Nov 19th, 2011 at 5:46am:
i saw Mick t. a couple years ago and his playing was fantastic.  Very next night he "got sick" and cancelled the remaining dates!!  Guy does seem to have issues...

Keith is working the PR machine big-time.  I think he's attempting to show Mick he can handle some of the "responsibility" of getting something going for the 50th.  It's never too late.  this is gonna be great



let's hope this could be good for mich t. as well as us fans... it would be special, but it could also be pathetic, if they trot him out and it's awkward b/c he's not taking care of himself... This is a really great oppurtunity for healing on so many levels, and the band to really shine.
I have to wonder, if they can get Wyman back to tour, and I nkow it's a stretch... would they go Steel Wheels part two for him, and ditch the jets for trains... they could easily, since they all need days off, especially Jaggers, who can't do back to backs anymore. DJ on bass has been ok, but we all know Bill has some depth and style that no one can duplicate. Especially if they record... Being able to really listen over the years of the catalog, I can hear how much he mattered... When he left, that bottom end just didn't ever have that punch and deepness he can bring... Let's go Amtrak or whatever trains are called!!!


___________________________________



Agreed.

**Is it possible, due to Wyman's reluctance to fly, will it be Wyman in Europe and Taylor in The States? .. .. .. hmmm? ..There's a plausible thought for the extravaganza that just may have them both in the cards that some how works.. .. ?


Still I wonder, does Wyman truly have a fear of flying and is this truly one of the real reasons why he stopped with the Stones? Possibly, he spun things a tad in order to not slight the band if they chose to continue without him, which they did.. Did he really ever say this or did anyone in their camp say that? Just curious. Sadly, I never really knew of his reasoning until the board here made light of this. Until rocks Off I always thought he had wanted to quit for a while, even up to ten years earlier simply because he wasn't up for all the hoopla every time and he didn't want to be in the Stones rolling machine anymore is all that I ever knew?


Ian
Back to top
 

Thought you were dinner  ...but you were the shark ..
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Online


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,228
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #89 - Dec 2nd, 2011 at 9:29am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Its not rumour. Wyman has said it, as has the whole band.

On his final European tour, he was driven everywhere.

Apart from one brief visit to the US in 2001, he hasnt flown since. All of his concerts take place in northern Europe.

It wasnt the ONLY reason - his marriage issues plus the fact that he'd had enough were significant too (he'd been talking about quitting back in 1982)

I think a few people are taking these off the cuff comments by Keith too literally.
Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
nankerphelge
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Maybe being bad is more
fun than being good...

Posts: 2,763
Sweet Virginia
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #90 - Dec 2nd, 2011 at 11:13am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
"So is a setlist slot for a once great song."

You could make the same exact argument for nearly any of the warhorses
Once great song, c'mon?
The song is still great!
Sure the Stones don't "play it like they used to" - but they hardly play any songs like they used to.
Doesn't mean it isn't a good song, and as a starter, which was my main point, it could be HUGE.
Seriously...did you go to the '94 show and see Not Fade Away as an opener?
It was amazingly good.

Okay, you got a bug up yer ass about Sympathy -- what would you suggest as an opener?
Brown Sugar, again?
Start Me Up, again?
Satisfaction, again?
Honky Tonk Women, again?




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ian Billen
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 1,562
USA
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #91 - Dec 2nd, 2011 at 12:17pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Gazza wrote on Dec 2nd, 2011 at 9:29am:
Its not rumour. Wyman has said it, as has the whole band.

On his final European tour, he was driven everywhere.

Apart from one brief visit to the US in 2001, he hasnt flown since. All of his concerts take place in northern Europe.

It wasnt the ONLY reason - his marriage issues plus the fact that he'd had enough were significant too (he'd been talking about quitting back in 1982)

I think a few people are taking these off the cuff comments by Keith too literally.


______________________________


Thanks for confirming Gazza. I knew he didn't fly and chose to drive everywhere over there when he is on tour but I didn't know if it was for certain.

I would take those comments from Keith with a huge grain of salt... however... Bill Wymans reply is what truly made me think something could be in the cards... for at least a few gigs or something. He actually said hed seriously think about it and that Charlie and him would click again if it all happened just as easily as before. Then he went on to basically say... all Keith gotta do is ask... well in a sense and to a point he was saying that anyway..


Ian
Back to top
 

Thought you were dinner  ...but you were the shark ..
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Online


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,228
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #92 - Dec 2nd, 2011 at 7:41pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
A Conversation with Bill Wyman

Mike Ragogna: Hello Bill, how are you?

Bill Wyman: I'm fine, thank you. I've got a day off of my tour, so I've got a day off so you've got a chance to talk to me.

MR: You've got a day off but they still put you to work.

BW: Oh yeah! I had a photo session this morning and I did another interview earlier. Yeah, a day off is not a day off, but I don't mind that, I'm kind of a workaholic.

MR: I definitely want to get to The Rolling Stones, but first, let's talk about the Rhythm Kings. What was the inspiration for putting that type of entourage together and to play that brand of music?

BW: Just to do music in a completely different way. I just kind of got fed up with stadiums and losing contact with the audience, and the way music was going. I thought, I love archeology, why don't I do an archeological dig into music, and just find a whole bunch of stuff from the past that people have forgotten or have never heard and just do anything. So, I got some musicians together and friends, and we just got into the studio for three days every month and cut eight songs. Then a month later, we would cut nine songs in the three days, then a month after that, we would do seven and so on. We ended up with about sixty tracks at the end of the year and they're all fantastic. They cover everything up from the '20s to the '70s. We had stuff from J.J. Cale, stuff from Fats Waller, we had Ethel Waters from the '20s, Ray Charles, Creedence Clearwater...you name it. It was just a whole mixture of stuff--rockabilly, blues, jazz, soul, gospel, spirituals--and I didn't know what to do with them. They were all great, and we always cut things in three takes, and if we don't get it in three, we just dump the song and move on to the next one. A lot of them are "take one," and a lot of them are either "take one" or "take three." I started to look around for a record company and everybody loved the stuff and have been playing it in the car back and forth to the studios, but they would pass on it because they didn't know how to put it out there and exploit it.

I got a bit disheartened, but that kind of happened with the Stones as well. We cut our first tracks in March of '63 and the record companies turned them down because they weren't commercial. So, I was hitting the same problems, and finally, a German company came ahead and signed us, then it took off like crazy. Everybody seemed to love the stuff, because there was a lot of variety there and great music, and great musicians. It was great, and then the record company says, "What about touring?" And I thought, "Oh no!" (laughs) I just wanted to make records and stay at home. So, we decided to do a few gigs as a tester, so we put out tickets for a show in Hamburg, Germany, and it sold out instantly, so we had to put a second show in that night. We did a run in Amsterdam, and that sold out, so we had to put a second show in there, and then we did one in London. I had Peter Frampton with me then and Gary Brooker of Procol Harum. The band I've got now--Georgie Fame, Albert Lee and we have Martin Taylor who's a great Jazz guitarist. It was just great fun, and I thought we might as well do this. People seem to like it, they want to come and watch us and we are getting great ovations ten minutes after the show's ended.

So, we started to do a tour of Europe every spring for three or four weeks--Europe, Scandinavia, sometimes out into Eastern Europe with Poland, Hungary, Prague, Latvia, and Lithuania. Then in the Autumn, we decided to do six weeks in England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and that's what we've been doing. It's wonderful. We get called back every year and we sell out everywhere and it's just fantastic. There's no pressure on us, we just go out there and do it for the love. There isn't a lot of money in there either, it's a nine, ten-piece band playing small gigs. That's not what we're doing it for though, we're doing it to play great music, we love to play together and just enjoy it.

MR: Then you guys must be having fun on the road.

BW: Oh yeah, you'll see that. Everybody says that. When you read the reviews, they will say there is great camaraderie on the stage, everybody seems to be having fun and enjoying themselves. Everybody seems to be leaving space for everyone, everybody admires everybody else's touches and techniques and performances. Without sounding too corny, it really is like a family.

MR: I imagine your extended family jumps on stage when they're in the area to have some fun with the gang.

BW: Yeah, jazz guitarist Martin Taylor, who's fantastic, is going to come in Scotland. He played with Stephane Grappelli for years. He's been the top jazz guitarist in England for almost twenty years now. Then we've got Dennis Locorriere from Dr. Hook who's going to meet us in Brighton on a show and come on stage. We're playing Gilford tomorrow, and Gary Brooker is going to come on stage with us because he lives there. We've got Mary Wilson of course who's doing a great job as our guest this year. It's very nice but the main thing is if you go into the studio, you can have all kinds of people come in. You can't always get them to perform with you. Mark Knopfler and Eric Clapton, people like that can't do it, but you can ask them to come do that in the studio and play on the album.

MR: Who's on the road with you now?

BW: The band I'm out on tour with is the band we started with, except we had Peter Frampton and Gary Brooker in it then. We've got a different piano player now, we've got Bob Dylan's favorite British piano player, Geraint Watkins--he's fantastic; Georgie Fame's on organ, Albert Lee's on guitar, Terry Taylor's on guitar, two horn players--Frank Mead, and Nick Payn. They also play harp and other instruments. Frank Mead is a wonderful Chicago blues harp player, and Nick plays harp in a different way, more of a country flavor. I have a beautiful black girl singer named Beverley Skeete who does all of our ballads and everything. I'm on bass and I've got a fantastic drummer who Roger Waters uses all of the time when he's not working for me. It's a great band and we're great friends.

MR: Do you have any stories about the recording or creative processes of your five albums as Rhythm Kings?

BW: I will give you an example when we got Beverley Skeete in after the first couple of sessions. She's been a backing vocalist for just about everybody in the business for years. She's a black girl and she's usually one of two or three. She's worked with Dusty Springfield, she's worked with Jamiroquai, she's worked with Chaka Khan, and she's on all of the Eurovision song contests. She educates and teaches all of the young artists that come through. She's worked with the Eurythmics and Annie Lennox, and so on and so on. I said, "I want you to do the Stone's song 'Melody,' I want you to sing it with Georgie Fame." We had the track done, so she came and Georgie and her went into the booth to do the vocal. We usually have a guide vocal...somebody puts it down really rough while we do the track. We don't layer or anything, we just do it live. They just go into the booth and they sing it, and I say, "Fantastic, that's it, we've got it." They say, "Can we do it again?" I say, "Didn't you like it?" They said, "We really liked it a lot, that's why we want to do it again. We're just having so much fun. We want to sing it a few more times." Of course, they sang it twice more and we got a much better take, actually. That's what I'm talking about--let's do it because we like it. That's hard to find in musicians these days, it doesn't happen anymore.

MR: Bill, why did you leave The Rolling Stones? Was it because you were tired of the arenas, all that, and you just wanted to reclaim your life?

BW: Yeah, and I was tired of traveling the world as well. I wanted more time at home, I wanted to get married again and start a family, which I did. I got married in '93. If I had still been in the Stones, I wouldn't have gotten married because the Stones were still working then. I got married and I've got three beautiful teenage daughters and it couldn't be nicer. We've been married 18 years now, and I do all of my work from home. I've written seven books in the last ten years, I do all kinds of events. I do photo exhibitions running all over the world. I've got a big one running in London at the moment, which is getting great reviews. I do charities, I've got a very famous restaurant here, I do archeology and work with museums. My life is full and wonderful.

MR: And you also invented a metal detector.

BW: Yeah, when I did archeology. I noticed that lots of young people were doing it, but they couldn't do it because metal detectors are quite heavy, and they actually tire you out on your arms. I found that with my daughter, my oldest one, wanted to come to metal detecting because she was interested in finding fossils and things. After five minutes, she found a few Roman coins and said she couldn't do it anymore because her arm ached. I thought maybe somebody could make a lighter weight one, so I talked to a metal detector company. They built me a children's one, but it was 90 percent as good as an adult's. So, it wasn't a cheap and nasty version, but it was lightweight, it had simple controls, and it still worked fairly well. It did the business and it's sold very well. Kids come back and say that they have one of the detectors. England's full of stuff, you can go into a field and just find stuff. (laughs) It's not like America, the history goes back. You can just go back into a field and find Bronze Age stuff, and Iron Age stuff. It's a whole mixture of stuff.

MR: As you mentioned, you're an author as well as a photographer. Which do you find you focus more on, your music or your other adventures?

BW: Well, in recent years, I've been focusing on photography. I do a lot of nature photography and a lot of landscape stuff. A part of the celebrity stuff. I've been shooting photography since '65, there's a lot of the Stones obviously on tour or in airports or backstage and whatever. So, I've got a whole mixture of movie stars, and friends like that. I've been focusing on that, and I've had quite a lot of exhibitions around the world. The one I've got in London right now is doing great business, and I've got great reviews for it, so that's very nice. I'm taking some of my pictures and putting them six feet wide, it's fantastic.

MR: Are you still using film or is it all digital?

BW: It's all digital now because of my eyesight. I was still using a Nikkormat with long lenses until recent years, two or three years ago. I started to realize that I couldn't get the focus as well as I used to with my eyesight. So, I went on to digital, and I was getting film back and some of them weren't in focus.

MR: Do you find that what drives you creatively for photography or making music comes from the same place?

BW: Yeah, I just move from one thing to the other when I find something interesting. When the photo exhibition finishes, I might ease off on photography and move onto something different. Maybe onto another book, maybe an historical book or I might go back and do something more musical. I just let it happen as it happens, I've always got ideas on the back burner.

MR: Are you in a constant creative mode?

BW: I'm like that morning, noon and night. The only time I stop doing things is when I go to the toilet and eat.

MR: What about your children? Do they have that behavior too?

BW: (laughs) Oh no, they think I'm mad. They're great, and they're very talented kids. One is a great artist, another one is a singer and she's writing songs and ideas. They're seventeen, fifteen, and thirteen. The little one is doing acting school, and she's been doing auditions for Harry Potter movies and Roald Dahl plays.

MR: When you look back at the Rhythm Kings years, are they some of the more important one for you making music?

BW: Well, I love my thirty years with the Stones, and the years before that, I played with my little band in South London when I was learning. I loved it in the '80s when I formed a band called Willie & The Poor Boys, and we did a couple of albums for the M.S. charity; Ronnie Lane of The Faces died of it later but we did those. I had Charlie Watts on that, Ringo was on the video, and I had a whole bunch of artists and musicians that joined me on that one. If I get an idea, I just start moving on it. I'm writing the history of my house in the country, which I've had since 1968, and the house dates from 1480--it's before Henry the VIII. It's got a moat around it, it's like a little castle. I've written a history book on that. I know every person that's lived in my house since 1150 when there was a house on the grounds before my house. That's fascinating too, so I've been doing that. I know the history of every person that lived there, I know who they married, where they were christened, where they were buried, how many children they had, what the children did. A lot of it is historical; there's famous people that came to my house; Rudyard Kipling used to come to my house. Some of the prime ministers of England used to come to my house. Through the years, they were all knights, and sirs and lords that lived there. The big family, the Chamberlin family, lived there for 250 years; the Buckingham family lived there for 150 years. They were all knights. One was beheaded at the Tower Of London. In recent years, we've had the worst gangsters in London called The Kray Twins. They used to come to my house before I bought it. The guy who I bought it off was the godfather of the Krays. There's all kind of history there, that's an interesting book there too.

MR: There must be some fascinating stories you came across, not just about the famous people.

BW: Oh yeah, it's great. One of the guys was with The Gunpowder Plot when they tried to blow up the House of Parliament on the 5th of November in the 1600s. One of Guy Fawkes's collaborators ancestors lived in my house. There's lots more and there's no time to do it all.

MR: Looking back at Bill Wyman now and Bill Wyman then, what have been some of the biggest changes that have happened to you over the years?

BW: There's some amazing coincidental happenings in my life. I've had things happen to me that are unbelievable, you could not believe it. I don't know if I've got a lucky streak there somewhere, but there are things I could tell you that happened to me that you would not believe. I was nearly killed in the war when I was a kid coming back from school. The sirens went off at lunch time; me and this other little boy--I was six--we ran to the house where I was living with my grandmother in South London where my family were up North away from the bombing. I was living with my grandma through the war. As we got to the top of our street, there was a German fighter bomber roaring up the street towards us, about ten yards off of the top of the chimneys of the houses machine gunning, and we just ran sideways behind a little wall and he just went past us machine gunning. Then we ran to our houses and my grandmother was waiting and we ran down to the shelter in the garden and he came past again the other way, still machine gunning. Then we went in the shelter. After the "all clear" went and we came out, we were all out in the streets digging the bullets out of the houses. We used to collect things like that. There's amazing stories, and I've talked about them in my books.

MR: Obviously, the elephant in the room will always be The Rolling Stones. May I ask a couple of questions about that period?

BW: (laughs) Go on.

MR: How would you describe your period with the Stones?

BW: Fantastic, I loved every minute of it. When we started off, we all thought it was going to last maybe two, maybe three, and if we're dead lucky, four years tops. We used to sit and think, "How long do you think it's going to last," and suddenly, it was 30 years. I was going to do all of these other things--photography, archeology, write books, etc.--30 years went by, and I hadn't done any of it. The only thing I had done was a couple of solo records, which were so-so popular--not too bad, and not too good, and I did a movie score and some photography in an amateur way. All of the other things I wanted to do, I didn't have time for. I really didn't have time to do the solo albums either, I did them in-between Stones things in pieces, which was unsatisfactory. So, I thought it was time to move on and it's time to do all of the other stuff I wanted to do. That's why I left. I wanted to start a new life again, and it's been wonderful. The great thing is, I'm still great mates with the band. We still send each other Christmas presents, birthday presents. I got a present from the Stones, I've got two huge, bouquets of roses, which I've got as many roses as my years. I'm 75, I got 75 roses from them and I've got a big thing of champagne. That's what we do, we stay friends. I work on projects with them as well. I was involved very heavily in the Universal 45s single box set because I'm the only one that had all of the singles. So, I did the deal with them and Universal and I gave them scans of everything, so they knew exactly how to reproduce the singles.

MR: It must be lovely to still have that kind of relationship with the band.

BW: I'm very close with Charlie, and we've always been very close and we're great mates. I chatted to him before I went on tour, we're just trying to get together. I played with him a few months ago when we did the Ian Stewart tribute together. I played bass on three songs with the Stones separately, not at the same time. Then we did the show, two shows actually; Ronnie Wood was on it, Mick Taylor was on it, Charlie Watts was on it, and I was on it. It's good to do those things.

MR: Once a Rolling Stone, always a Rolling Stone.

BW: Well, that's the problem, because the taxi driver will say, "Hello Bill, when are the Stones touring again?" I would say, "I left twenty years ago." People still think of me as a part of the Stones.

MR: Bill, what advice would you have for new artists?

BW: Try to write some decent songs first. Practice, practice, practice. Listen to the people in the past that played the instrument you're playing and learn from them. That's the way I learned, that's the way Mick and Keith learned. Just copying lines and riffs and things, then you can do your own thing. Once you've gathered that info, you can do it your own way. That's the way I do it and that's the way I always suggest to young musicians. A lot of young musicians come to the show and start asking me about what bass guitar I use, and I just say to them to practice and try to write some decent songs.

MR: What bass are you playing these days?

BW: I've been using Steinbergers for the last twenty odd years with the Rhythm Kings up until this year. I've had a bass guitar made which is like a clone of the bass guitar I made in 1961, before I joined the Stones and didn't have money to build one, so I bought one. It was by pure accident, it was the first fretless bass ever made. That's what I'm using now, it's lightweight, small scale, and it's perfect for young kids to learn on.

MR: You've been really fantastic and thank you for taking sometime to chat.

BW: Thank you so much.

Bill Wyman's Rhythm Kings Collector's Edition Box Set:

Struttin' Our Stuff

Groovin'

Anyway The Wind Blows

Double Bill Volume 1

Double Bill Volume 2

Transcribed By Theo Shier

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-ragogna/moline-loves-paul-simon-p_b_1100883.h...
Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
Nellcote
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


So, what's your point?

Posts: 2,920
Funifuti
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #93 - Dec 3rd, 2011 at 6:45am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Great read, thanks very much!
Back to top
 

"slide your body, girl, right across the floor..do the Southside Shuffle..."Southside Shuffle-Mighty J Geils Band
 
IP Logged
 
gimmekeef
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 5,753
Ontario Canada
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #94 - Dec 3rd, 2011 at 8:28am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
There is only one song to open the tour..one they have never opened with:
"The Last Time"......I don't know???...oh no
Back to top
 

"Runnin Like A Cat In A Thunderstorm"
 
IP Logged
 
ijwthstd
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,049
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #95 - Dec 7th, 2011 at 11:32am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
nankerphelge wrote on Dec 2nd, 2011 at 11:13am:
"So is a setlist slot for a once great song."

You could make the same exact argument for nearly any of the warhorses
Once great song, c'mon?
The song is still great!
Sure the Stones don't "play it like they used to" - but they hardly play any songs like they used to.


Sympathy has been more brutally emasculated than most of their songs. It's now a showtune to bring the grandkids on stage to dance to.

Quote:
Doesn't mean it isn't a good song, and as a starter, which was my main point, it could be HUGE.
Seriously...did you go to the '94 show and see Not Fade Away as an opener?
It was amazingly good.


Great, they could do that again,

Quote:
Okay, you got a bug up yer ass about Sympathy -- what would you suggest as an opener?
Brown Sugar, again?
Start Me Up, again?
Satisfaction, again?
Honky Tonk Women, again?


The first 3 yes, anything fast really. Satisfaction should only be included if they can do it in 3:45 or under.


Back to top
 

"I went and saw Chickenfoot twice. I've suffered for being Sammy's friend" - Bob Forrest.&&&&http://www.soundcloud.com/thesameoldsauce
TotallyRandomDan  
IP Logged
 
nankerphelge
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Maybe being bad is more
fun than being good...

Posts: 2,763
Sweet Virginia
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #96 - Dec 7th, 2011 at 12:21pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
"Sympathy has been more brutally emasculated than most of their songs. It's now a showtune to bring the grandkids on stage to dance to. "

That's in the ears and eyes of the beholder.
Tumbling Dice, Honky Tonk Women, hell even Brown Sugar are all more "show-tunish" these days.
To say that Sympathy is more emasculated than others is more a matter of personal taste than musical fact.

And while Not Fade Away was a great opener, it was never the Classic that Sympathy was in the Stones catalog.
Sympathy is one of their most recognized songs ever, is certainly not a slow tempo song, and would set a very dark Stonesy mood similar to what Not Fade Away did in 94.

Yet you dismiss it as a show tune.
How do you call yourself a Stones fan?






Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ijwthstd
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,049
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #97 - Dec 7th, 2011 at 1:03pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
nankerphelge wrote on Dec 7th, 2011 at 12:21pm:
"Sympathy has been more brutally emasculated than most of their songs. It's now a showtune to bring the grandkids on stage to dance to. "

That's in the ears and eyes of the beholder.
Tumbling Dice, Honky Tonk Women, hell even Brown Sugar are all more "show-tunish" these days.


Sure

Quote:
To say that Sympathy is more emasculated than others is more a matter of personal taste than musical fact.


What happened to the Who Killed The Kennedys line anyway or did I just fail to hear it the past few times?

[quote]
And while Not Fade Away was a great opener, it was never the Classic that Sympathy was in the Stones catalog.
Sympathy is one of their most recognized songs ever, is certainly not a slow tempo song, and would set a very dark Stonesy mood similar to what Not Fade Away did in 94.


I really doubt the next tour will be anything close to dark in mood and few versions of Sympathy the last few tours have struck me that way. Shame, because the effects were great. Tighten it up a bit, or better yet, just bury it.

Quote:
Yet you dismiss it as a show tune.
How do you call yourself a Stones fan?


Whatever, dude.



Back to top
 

"I went and saw Chickenfoot twice. I've suffered for being Sammy's friend" - Bob Forrest.&&&&http://www.soundcloud.com/thesameoldsauce
TotallyRandomDan  
IP Logged
 
Ian Billen
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 1,562
USA
Gender: male
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #98 - Dec 9th, 2011 at 4:30pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 


Well, it's on.

It is naive to think that the only reason for this "jam" is simply to have a good time and see what happens .. .. ..

I must say that there is reasoning behind this .."jam".. as they are putting it.

You don't rent out a studio together again with guitar techs... etc. etc. just to say hello, reacquaint, and have a good time because you haven't seen them in a long time.  If they simply wanted to socialize and play some music again so very badly what kept Bill and the rest from scheduling something for doing such over the last 20 odd years? Why not just throw a party at one of their mansions? Why not rent a hall... whatever.. but you don't get together with old band mates in a "studio" with guitar technicians unless there is a definite purpose involved.  It's that simple -

Call me optimistic, call it jumping the gun, call me enthusiastic or whatever... but to me, it's not even overly obvious... At this point  it's a "no brainer.." they are going to record new stuff. What more do they have to do in order to open doubters to that idea? .. give them a track listing?.. .. 


Ian
Back to top
 

Thought you were dinner  ...but you were the shark ..
 
IP Logged
 
BILL PERKS
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,188
NJ
Re: the stones to play again in 2011
Reply #99 - Dec 9th, 2011 at 6:40pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
ijwthstd wrote on Dec 7th, 2011 at 1:03pm:
nankerphelge wrote on Dec 7th, 2011 at 12:21pm:
"Sympathy has been more brutally emasculated than most of their songs. It's now a showtune to bring the grandkids on stage to dance to. "

That's in the ears and eyes of the beholder.
Tumbling Dice, Honky Tonk Women, hell even Brown Sugar are all more "show-tunish" these days.


Sure

Quote:
To say that Sympathy is more emasculated than others is more a matter of personal taste than musical fact.


What happened to the Who Killed The Kennedys line anyway or did I just fail to hear it the past few times?

[quote]
And while Not Fade Away was a great opener, it was never the Classic that Sympathy was in the Stones catalog.
Sympathy is one of their most recognized songs ever, is certainly not a slow tempo song, and would set a very dark Stonesy mood similar to what Not Fade Away did in 94.


I really doubt the next tour will be anything close to dark in mood and few versions of Sympathy the last few tours have struck me that way. Shame, because the effects were great. Tighten it up a bit, or better yet, just bury it.

Quote:
Yet you dismiss it as a show tune.
How do you call yourself a Stones fan?


Whatever, dude.




THE LAST GOOD SYMPATHY VERSION WAS 1989 ATLANTIC CITY..TIME TO RETIRE IT.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Gazza, Voodoo Chile in Wonderland)