Pdog wrote on Mar 16
th, 2012 at 6:35pm:
never thought I'd see a comment like, it's not like they are 60, they're 70, and say... to myself... that makes sense.
certain decades to make for big changes... 10 to 20 and 60 to 70... at a certain ppint in live, the body has extremes...
_______________________________________
Exactly, and this is the point I am trying to drive home. It doesn't seem like a big deal and many see it as just ten years.. just a decade... but the 10 years between a 60 year old and a 70 year old is pretty significant. There's a big difference between a 60 year old and a 70 year old.
20-30 (a change) 30-40 (not much)... 40-50 (not bad)... 60-70 (significant change).
Folks say .. well they did it just four or five years ago. Well they struggled to do it at that traveling pace four or five years ago. It wasn't easy on them then and they had a harder time with it. Now, with this long lay-off, it probably is a very good call they try and work into this slowly. Even when they are ready, the days of The Rolling Stones traveling from city to city in hotel after hotel and hoping all over the globe will be significantly scaled back and altered.
The structure has changed because they have hit a new stage in their long career. 60 and 70 is a big change. I was trying to get people to think about this a few months ago when I said I couldn't beleive they were going to attempt another one of these major tours at this age, out in the weather, all that stuff. Now we are seeing they have some scrouples..
- Ian