sweetcharmedlife wrote on Aug 22
nd, 2015 at 9:06am:
sirmoonie wrote on Aug 21
st, 2015 at 12:46pm:
SCL, it's the way all the parties decided to proceed. If it's fucked up, it's their business, not the judge's.
The NFL spent millions on a comprehensive report, and gave Brady and the Pats full opportunity to be heard, represented and to participate. They declined and lied. There is nothing wrong with how the NFL has proceeded.
Berman actually pointed out, when telling the NFL that they had no case, that Brady's stats got better when he couldn't moof the balls anymore. What kind of idiotic mind thinks that way? He knows dick about football.
sirmoonie wrote on Aug 21
st, 2015 at 12:46pm:
SCL, it's the way all the parties decided to proceed. If it's fucked up, it's their business, not the judge's.
The NFL spent millions on a comprehensive report, and gave Brady and the Pats full opportunity to be heard, represented and to participate. They declined and lied. There is nothing wrong with how the NFL has proceeded.
Berman actually pointed out, when telling the NFL that they had no case, that Brady's stats got better when he couldn't moof the balls anymore. What kind of idiotic mind thinks that way? He knows dick about football.
The Patriots did not lie and did participate. They took the fine and the 1st rd pick penalty. Brady testified under oath he didn't have anything to do with it. The ball boys testified he had nothing to do with it.Wells told Brady their was no penalty if he didn't turn over his phone. The NFL has lied and manipulated the entire thing every step of the way. Berman told them as much yesterday.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/deflate-gate-is-rotting-roger-goodell-s-spoils-of-l... 1. If the accused's denials under oath were sufficient, no one would ever be convicted of anything. If Brady was "under oath" (and its likely HE will later argue that he wasn't), it backfired, because that's when we first heard of the destroyed phone.
2. I'm not convinced by denials of the accused here, in light of the evidence that was cited in the Wells Report. The opposite - none of them, including "the Deflator", are credible at all.
3. Wells did not tell Brady there was no penalty if he didn't turn over his phone. Wells would have no authority to say that one way or the other. Wells did not tell Brady he was free to destroy his phone. If Brady and his many lawyers assumed even for a second that there would be no repercussions for destroying evidence and failing to cooperate in a formal investigation, then they are retarded (and maybe insane).
4. I am not aware of a single NFL lie.
5. Berman is an idiot, who doesn't understand football, and is stretching way to far for a settlement because he doesn't understand what is in front of him.