Gazza wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 8:05am:


My money is on them going along with it and then hiding behind Mick like wimps while they holiday at each other's houses in the Caribbean.

I cannot wait to see them.
Don't care if its a fucking outhouse, you bunch of spoiled pussies.

Y'all bitch that you want a North American tour and when they graciously give you one, it's

"oooOOOOooohhh the ticket prices are too high"

Yeah well you have months to save up, steal it, or open up a new credit card.

"ooOOOoooOOoh I won't go see them in stadiums"

Go see Sting.
That's a better deal anyway, right?
He will probably play arenas, and will play Walking on the Moon - YAY!!!

Y'all make me want to puke up my coffee.
Me and my shitty attitude would appreciate it if y'all luke-warm, not-really-fans just stay outta the way.

They have to settle if they want to see them.
Plain and simple.

I hear the club gig is gonna be in Paris Hiltons pussy.

they still gotta play the new Falcons and/or Braves stadiums.

We may have to open up her anus KINS

Joey has gone Pro.

Thats posting Kins. Remember, when Paris's pee pee is astry, in sweet virginia you must stay

the taint is wide open.

Sigh. I know you're right, Gazza--what's that Rush song?

"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."

A passive decision by the rest of the band is still a decision. Is there anyone else who tours this way anymore? 

nankerphelge wrote on Mar 3^rd, 2015 at 6:01am:


Fuck yeah. Then maybe people would stop telling me to sit down and stop dancing and/or stop singing along at fucking ROLLING STONES SHOWS.


blarrcgch4rtdgdsfag;ewnj~~~~@!!!!

Bitch wrote on Mar 3^rd, 2015 at 9:42pm:


the header only related to a story that the Stones were meeting in New York

They almost exclusively stuck to 'A' markets in 2013. Some of which got more than one shows. Reason for that being the shows were so expensive there were very few markets where there was enough interest to pay that sort of money.

This time they're more likely to try out a few more 'B' markets as they may have milked dry some of the larger ones. Playing minor markets wouldnt have been feasible had they kept the same formula as 2013. (similarly, they played stadium sized venues in Europe in 2014 because when they investigated the possibility of an arena tour there in late 2013 they soon found out that promoters in most countries wouldnt take the risk)

Playing some of the shows in stadiums allows them to keep the more ridiculous prices for the best tickets, but allows more manoevre for a more affordable range of tickets. An option which is much more attractive for a potential promoter than having to charge an average ticket price of about $300- 400 to break even as was the case two years ago. 


They havent played the New York area since Dec 2012 have they? Forest Hills seems an odd choice if thats where theyre going as it only holds about 14-15,000. They'll probably promote that by trying to convince you its akin to a club show by Stones standards. Dont expect too many seats to be available in the cheapest price range for that one!

I hear ya leonid.

I was bitchy yesterday -- what with my shitty attitude and all.

No one wants to plunk down the kind of money they will be asking, only to see the same damn thing yet again.

I get that - I do, really.

BUT....they are still my band.
I will still go see them -- even though it is not the ideal.
They are still touring at their age, and I respect that.
They give you a good show and the concert is really an excuse as Mick once noted.  The fun in going to a new city, hanging with fellow Stones idiots and having a good time.

It is what separates us from the Beatles fans.