Pdog wrote on Oct 4
th, 2009 at 7:47am:
They should really try something different, like release a series of 3 to 5 song ep's during a tour, really take a risk at putting out new music, since things have changed so much... market new music and a tour in a different way... they've always been able to reinvent the the wheel. they need to offer me a job...
Yes, yes, yes! I've been banging my drum about this for months. Their only use for a major label at this point is management of its archives and future reissues from same. Other than that, they need to reconsider how they've done business from '89 onward: the corporate-sponsored late-summer new album/tour package, with the dramatic, stunt-laden announcement. It's stale. They've wrung every dollar they can out of what is essentially a pre-meltdown model.
U2 is putting on a big show, yes -- but they're charging about an average of $55 a head while also opening up a swath of stadium-seating that's typically gobbled up by a stage. Lots of room for lots of warm bodies, in other words.
The Jagger/Cohl approach — gouge a decreasing number of well-heeled fans with ever-increasing severity — is done for.
If they release a standard new album next year, it will attract even fewer ears than did "A Bigger Bang."
If they want to release new material, great. Just give the damn thing away. Better yet, perhaps, sell it in stores, but give it away digitally with each ticket purchase. All things being equal, sales would probably end up the same, but the band could expect more concergoers to actually know the new material.