Gazza wrote on May 17
th, 2009 at 1:28pm:
I'm not so sure it's comparable, Mel. Mick and Keith's track record in squeezing collaborators out of the publishing royalties suggests that if someone gets a co-credit along with them, then they've REALLY done something to earn it.
With 'Lonely at the top' its a bit different because the song was originally written for a Rolling Stones project - and presumably was copyrighted. If one of the Glimmer Twins gets a credit or co-credit for a Stones song, then they BOTH get it. Which is a bit unfortunate for Ronnie, for example, with regards to Dirty Work as he co-wrote most of the album with Keith, but ended up seeing the royalties for the songs split three ways between himself, Mick and Keith.
You may be right. Although, Mick and Keith -- well, maybe just Keith -- have gotten more generous about it over the years. Leavell got one -- having asked for one at the outset. Then again, Pierre DeBeauport was surprised when he got one.
But I think the basic legal principle was the same in both the case of "Lonely" and AHYS. It seems to me that the Richards/Jordan was a rubber stamp on the Talk Is Cheap project, no matter who came up with what, in much the same way that the Jagger/Richards byline goes on everything willy-nilly.