|
BiggestMistake
|
Ronnie-Woody: I can’t say I fault Keith here. Slogging through Europe all summer doing a show every 4 or 5 days seems like a drag under the best of conditions. Add the family’s desire for him to not be that far away for months at a time, when Connecticut is in full bloom, and I really don’t see this being that big of a deal, and certainly not the end of the line.
Mick would appear to be in a bit of a bind now. I’m speculating but … If it’s true he is adamantly opposed to residencies, and if it’s true a major stadium tour of [anywhere] put off to 2027 is hard to imagine being viable, but Keith is only comfortable doing small-scale work now, either in (conceivably) a residency arrangement or an arena tour in the colder months, or a series of promotional shows (PPV, Netflix, etc), Mick would have to be the one budge. If it’s true they need a few a weeks of rehearsals to make ANY live appearances worthwhile, then Keith might have to budge in that direction, but that’s an easy one; there is no indication he only wants to do poo-up guest duets these days.
We can play what-if all day, but it’s not realistic to think they are just letting the Stones Enterprise ball roll to a stop because Keith doesn’t want to spend next summer doing occasional gigs thousands of miles from home.
Set aside the money they might make, stadiums they might not fill, and the tepid performance of the B&B release and IMAX run. Those things might be in the equation for whatever is in store, but the Stones have given every appearance of guys who still love to play, and, as I noted at first, they’re still ambulatory, healthy, and popping up on stage here and there. Keith can’t play like it’s 1976, or 1989, but he can still play well enough.
As for this Epstein awkwardness, it’ll blow over quickly (for Mick).
If Mick had genuine exposure he’d have been sued (and settled) by now. We’d know if that had happened. As it stands, he’s in the same boat as Noam Chomsky, Princess Di, and other celebrities who had the misfortune of being photographed in Epstein’s social orbit. The attack media will have riper targets than a fully clothed, unaccused Mick Jagger.
For the last few years, I’ve been more concerned that a late-emerging story would come from the Me Too movement, from any number of underage girls Mick & Co might have been overly familiar with back in the day, and that didn’t happen.
I respectfully disagree with Revvy on this one. I don’t believe the imminent potential release of (benign) photos of Mick in proximity to Epstein had anything whatsoever to do with them calling off any possible Euro tour. I sure don’t believe Keith would take the bullet for Mick if that was the case (better to just say nothing).
It’s not insurance, Patti, the daughters or granddaughters, Mick’s foot, Keith’s arthritis, Trump, Epstein, Spotify performance, Charlie’s ghost, or the economy. And it’s not retirement.
I think Occam’s razor applies here. Keith simply didn’t want to do THAT tour at THAT time. It didn’t appeal to him. Full stop.
The sky isn’t falling.
|