andrews27 wrote on Jan 25
th, 2014 at 10:26pm:
I'm sorry, but why would Jagger - who ate The Verve alive and never bothered to spit them out - allow that song to be used in that show for the shit price that that network could pay?
People who make higher budgeted shows and films can't afford to license better songs in the original artists' renditions - they accept the cheaper rate to license a cover version, not the $tar performance. It's even cheaper when the $upporting musicians are not those on the record$.
Send it to the Stones organization. Let the lawyers decide.
I understand and appreciate your points, but there are a lot of assumptions in there.
We're not talking Start Me Up here. If its Jagger, its so obscure, we don't even know it. Much less $$$ to license.
It doesn't have to be Stones property either, it could be some Jagger project, of which I'm sure he has dozens. Who knows what rights he retains - does he own Ruthless People? State of Shock? Right to license background vocals to You're So Vain?
The show/movie is made by October Films UK, and we have no idea how much money they have or don't have.
Also, "voice misappropriation" is a tort limited to California, I believe. But wherever it is, the existence of it as a cause of action, factors toward this not being a Jagger knock-off.