Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
   
Offline

Rat Bastid "We piss anywhere, man.."
Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender:
|
Kilroy wrote on Jan 5 th, 2014 at 2:52pm: gimmekeef wrote on Dec 30 th, 2013 at 8:03am: Gazza wrote on Dec 29 th, 2013 at 5:25pm: Heart Of Stone wrote on Dec 28 th, 2013 at 5:53pm: Gazza wrote on Dec 28 th, 2013 at 2:05pm: Pdog wrote on Dec 28 th, 2013 at 9:16am: The Stones and Beatles were boy bands 50 years ago. No they werent - they were two groups of friends who got together due to a mutual love of the same music. Boy bands are brought together by media moguls through a process of auditions to make money, some of them not even knowing each other beforehand. You are correct Gazza, the term Boy bands wasn't around in '64, The Beatles who got The Stones into writing their own music, were the first to actually write their own music, before that they had songwriters to write their music, Frankie Avalon, Fabion, you name it, they were made to be tenny bopper idols, the Beatles/Stones changed all that, I was around in '64, so I know what I'm talking about. I know the term wasnt around - my point was that the concept of what became a 'boy band', ie manufactured groups where the band members auditioned - wasnt what those bands were. You could argue that the Monkees fitted more into that category, but that was a few years later. Apparently Stephen Stills auditioned for them - and may have got the job if he'd had better teeth. Stills may have been eliminated when they found out he actually could play guitar..... IMO The Osmonds, The Jackson 5,The Monkees Fit the bill! As first in the thin called Boy Bands! A group of brothers forming a band, encouraged by pushy parents was hardly a new thing. Nothing The Beach Boys and others hadn't done years earlier.
|