BONOISLOVE wrote on May 4
th, 2012 at 11:30am:
Enough with the superlatives! This film is good, from a technical POV, but it's no Titanic (3D version). Don't believe in the critics, the oscars, or the french. U2 Rattle and Hum is, after all, everybody's idea of the most important best film ever made. Some people didn't like it, but I bet they enjoy doing some very nasty thing to themselves.
Has anyone seen Madonna? She should be punished for her "singing", alright, and for being a fake lesbian; however, I bet she's like the greatest actress ever. Like Julia Roberts or Brad Pitt.
Who cares about ugly angry people from the past like Spencer Tracy or George C. Scott? They always looked old.
Also, what's the deal with all those subtitled movies?
________________________________________________
The raw technical aspects of the filming wasn't so much it (although for what technology they had at the time the film is still fantastic... timeless). It is the acting, the score, the build-up ... the uniqueness of the parts... the characters and how they captivate you... how the story is incorporated to the film... the editing ...all those less technical aspects. As far as the more technical stuff goes... Kubrick captivates you more with angles, scenery, lighting and costume than modern day films with all their million dollar camera equipment.
THAT is what makes great directing my friend, not the latest film technology. Leonardo Dicaprio with all the latest 3D film technology is less than forgettable next to Malcolm McDowell as Alex. There is where it lies.
Ian