Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
Home Help Search Login Register Broadcast Message to Admin(s)


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London (Read 12,514 times)
ijwthstd
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,068
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #50 - Sep 9th, 2011 at 4:30pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Mick is holding a bundle of Superheavy CD's he unsuccessfully tried to hand out.

Also looks like he dusted off the Voodoo Lounge wig.
Back to top
 

"I went and saw Chickenfoot twice. I've suffered for being Sammy's friend" - Bob Forrest.

https://www.youtube.com/@ijwthstd/videos
TotallyRandomDan  
IP Logged
 
Tumbling Dijs
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


The Stones in a club is
still the ultimate rush.

Posts: 356
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #51 - Sep 9th, 2011 at 4:57pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Gazza wrote on Sep 9th, 2011 at 3:19pm:
left shoe shuffle wrote on Sep 9th, 2011 at 10:18am:
[We're putting this out to our readers: What do you think Jagger is holding in that photo? We think he probably saw that there were photographers outside and covered something up in a purple towel – but what?  



An advance Jagger-approved copy of the '2012 Tour Edition of 'Life''

The last 50 pages have been removed entirely and all references to Mick's todger have been prefaced with the word 'huge' written in indelible ink.

A copy will be sent with every concert ticket and press pass to ensure every Stones fan and journalist get the message.


LOL. Maybe it's a camera. He's often filming during the preparations for a tour, so it can be used in a documentary. So maybe, in a couple of years, in a documentary about the last Stones worldtour ever, we can see Keith apologize to Mick for being such an asshole for all these years and thank Mick that he always was a gentleman (in public) concerning other Stonesmembers, and admit that thanks to Mick they have made it for 50 years. Nevertheless, still love Keith, and hope for a decent "Little T&A" this tour. But that's wishfull thinking!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
GotToRollMe
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


'soft and freaky'

Posts: 1,918
Gender: female
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #52 - Sep 9th, 2011 at 6:35pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Mick's got his touring hair on!
Back to top
 

"She delivers right on time,&&I can't resist a corny line, &&But take the shine right off your shoes"&&&&"When I die I want to be burned and blown up Gazza's ass. Is he up for that? Is he a true stones fan. I know Voodoo would do it." - TomL '07&&...        ...        ...          ...          ...&&..'til the wheels come off...
 
IP Logged
 
Ian Billen
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 1,564
USA
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #53 - Sep 11th, 2011 at 12:55am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Steel Wheels wrote on Sep 8th, 2011 at 4:06pm:
Where's the usual Rocks Off negativity?



_________________________

It's already started (..still though, I love this board dearly). Already many are saying there will be no new album because, oh well...let's see: ...they simply are not into it...or ...there's no time (I guess a full year isn't even enough time for their estimation)...or Mick and Keith don't truly get along well enough...or Keith has writers block....or there is not enough interest to their target audience... or Universal isn't truly interested in a new album because it probably will not sell well... or... they will have flooded the market with too many Stones releases if they release a new studio album (that one, has some substance...still I think they will schedule things accordingly to bypass such a problem) or...Mick will be too busy on his SuperHeavy group and will probably diss The Stones and their recording possibilities... or ... well, never mind...but you get the point Wink


My guess is yes, they will record a new studio album (however possibly it shall be released and as well made available in a "new" way... some how?...? hmmm?) because IMO 1. They would not want to exactly repeat 2002-2003 Licks concept 2. They never wanted to be touted as a touring Nostalgia act....why would they start that role now? 3. Mick and Keith have mentioned getting into the studio with The Stones and/or doing more records with The Stones a few times within the past several months.


Ian

Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 11th, 2011 at 1:00am by Ian Billen »  

Thought you were dinner  ...but you were the shark ..
 
IP Logged
 
Joey
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Online



Posts: 20,652
Omaha , NE
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #54 - Sep 11th, 2011 at 9:31am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 


I ( Your Young Joey ) remain so excited that I continue , CONTINUE to type with my penis .


Snuggles ! ®
Back to top
 

...&&&&D.J. Jazzy Joe and the Fresh Prince of Boca Raton !™&& *** " VICTORY !!!! " ***...
 
IP Logged
 
Bitch
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


I always get my Rocks
Off!

Posts: 4,904
FL - USA
Gender: female
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #55 - Sep 11th, 2011 at 6:00pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Charlie is holding a notebook, thats a good sign that he was taking meeting notes, possibly writing down dates? Charlie may have to rearrange his plans if there is are Stones events in the works! This is exciting, I'm salivating, hell yeah!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gotdablouse
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,002
Paris, France
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #56 - Sep 11th, 2011 at 6:12pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
ijwthstd wrote on Sep 9th, 2011 at 4:30pm:
Mick is holding a bundle of Superheavy CD's he unsuccessfully tried to hand out.

Also looks like he dusted off the Voodoo Lounge wig.


LOL x2 !
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Edith Grove
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Disco STILL sucks!

Posts: 12,336
New Orleans
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #57 - Sep 11th, 2011 at 6:17pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Bitch wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 6:00pm:
Charlie is holding a notebook, thats a good sign that he was taking meeting notes, possibly writing down dates? Charlie may have to rearrange his plans if there is are Stones events in the works! This is exciting, I'm salivating, hell yeah!


Might have just been sketching the inside of the meeting room.  LOL
Back to top
 

“What rap did that was impressive was to show there are so many tone-deaf people out there,” he says. “All they need is a drum beat and somebody yelling over it and they’re happy. There’s an enormous market for people who can’t tell one note from another.” - Keef
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #58 - Sep 12th, 2011 at 7:00am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Ian Billen wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 12:55am:
Steel Wheels wrote on Sep 8th, 2011 at 4:06pm:
Where's the usual Rocks Off negativity?



_________________________

It's already started (..still though, I love this board dearly). Already many are saying there will be no new album because, oh well...let's see: ...they simply are not into it...or ...there's no time (I guess a full year isn't even enough time for their estimation)...or Mick and Keith don't truly get along well enough...or Keith has writers block....or there is not enough interest to their target audience... or Universal isn't truly interested in a new album because it probably will not sell well... or... they will have flooded the market with too many Stones releases if they release a new studio album (that one, has some substance...still I think they will schedule things accordingly to bypass such a problem) or...Mick will be too busy on his SuperHeavy group and will probably diss The Stones and their recording possibilities... or ... well, never mind...but you get the point Wink


My guess is yes, they will record a new studio album (however possibly it shall be released and as well made available in a "new" way... some how?...? hmmm?) because IMO 1. They would not want to exactly repeat 2002-2003 Licks concept 2. They never wanted to be touted as a touring Nostalgia act....why would they start that role now? 3. Mick and Keith have mentioned getting into the studio with The Stones and/or doing more records with The Stones a few times within the past several months.


Ian



Thats not 'negativity'. It's realism. I apologise for thinking that a Rolling Stones album in 2012 will not be a massive seller, or that their record label would be more focussed on their back catalogue, seeing as thats why they signed them in the first place added to the fact that they already have two multi-disc releases earmarked for 2012.

The fact that I would prefer a studio album means nothing.

You seem to live in a fantasy world, Ian, where you prefer to take selected quotes by Mick and Keith over a period of years at face value. Some of us just happen to be more realistic.


By the way, can you direct me to these recent interviews with Mick where he talked about making a new Stones record?
Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #59 - Sep 12th, 2011 at 7:03am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
steel driving hammer wrote on Sep 9th, 2011 at 3:27pm:
Wondering if they didn't wan't to be seen in public, why didn't they meet at night, or in secret, like they've done many times.

"Let's go be seen! Let's dress up chic! Show we're in love! Right on our street!"


What makes you convinced that they 'didnt want to be seen in public' ?

When did they 'meet in secret' ?

Having a business meeting with fellow band members is something they do at least once a year when theyre not working. Its not as if they need to issue a press release announcing that they'll be in the same building.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 12th, 2011 at 7:05am by Gazza »  

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
left shoe shuffle
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 4,141
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #60 - Sep 12th, 2011 at 3:31pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 

Mick talks 'Some Girls', meeting talk and RS50 with Spinner:

What do you have planned with the Stones right now?

I just finished off doing all the outtakes for the 'Some Girls' album we're releasing at Thanksgiving. We did 'Exile,' we did a lot of different takes, a lot of different cuts that hadn't come out before, so we're doing the similar kind of thing with 'Some Girls,' so I've just been doing them because a lot of them weren't complete, so I had to complete them, and then we're gonna mix those and put them out for Thanksgiving. Then we talked about maybe what events are going to be going around for the 50th anniversary of the Rolling Stones. We don't really know the answer to that, but we talked about it a bit.

Does it blow your mind that the anniversary is coming up?

It sounds a lot of years to me. But you know, you're very lucky to have been doing it that long, so I guess I should be happy [laughs].



http://goo.gl/uvRPn
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 12th, 2011 at 4:00pm by left shoe shuffle »  

...
 
IP Logged
 
chris girard
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Blues lover

Posts: 51
Retired & happy
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #61 - Sep 12th, 2011 at 3:49pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Mick is holding a book tha Keith gave him to read.

Mick and Keith are business partners and friends. They have known each other for 40+ years, and I doubt there is anything that happens between them that is surprising, including Keith's book and Mick's new group. They both recognize that the Rolling Stones is a world wide brand and they aren't going to do anything to hurt the brand. If you go to ther offical Rolling Stone site you find Keith's book and then new group quite promantely on it. If Mick was pissed at Keith or vise versa none of that would be on their web site. I would not surprise me in the least if all this "book controversey" isn't planned as a way to keep the brand in  the news as will as Mick's Super group. I understand that Keith's book might become a movie, don't be surprised if Jagged Pictures has a hand in that endevor, maybe behind the scenes, but they will be involved in some way.

I hope they at least produce one more album and maybe a short tour.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ian Billen
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 1,564
USA
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #62 - Sep 12th, 2011 at 8:54pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Gazza wrote on Sep 12th, 2011 at 7:00am:
Ian Billen wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 12:55am:
Steel Wheels wrote on Sep 8th, 2011 at 4:06pm:
Where's the usual Rocks Off negativity?



_________________________

It's already started (..still though, I love this board dearly). Already many are saying there will be no new album because, oh well...let's see: ...they simply are not into it...or ...there's no time (I guess a full year isn't even enough time for their estimation)...or Mick and Keith don't truly get along well enough...or Keith has writers block....or there is not enough interest to their target audience... or Universal isn't truly interested in a new album because it probably will not sell well... or... they will have flooded the market with too many Stones releases if they release a new studio album (that one, has some substance...still I think they will schedule things accordingly to bypass such a problem) or...Mick will be too busy on his SuperHeavy group and will probably diss The Stones and their recording possibilities... or ... well, never mind...but you get the point Wink


My guess is yes, they will record a new studio album (however possibly it shall be released and as well made available in a "new" way... some how?...? hmmm?) because IMO 1. They would not want to exactly repeat 2002-2003 Licks concept 2. They never wanted to be touted as a touring Nostalgia act....why would they start that role now? 3. Mick and Keith have mentioned getting into the studio with The Stones and/or doing more records with The Stones a few times within the past several months.


Ian



Thats not 'negativity'. It's realism. I apologise for thinking that a Rolling Stones album in 2012 will not be a massive seller, or that their record label would be more focussed on their back catalogue, seeing as thats why they signed them in the first place added to the fact that they already have two multi-disc releases earmarked for 2012.

The fact that I would prefer a studio album means nothing.

You seem to live in a fantasy world, Ian, where you prefer to take selected quotes by Mick and Keith over a period of years at face value. Some of us just happen to be more realistic.


By the way, can you direct me to these recent interviews with Mick where he talked about making a new Stones record?



_____________________________

Mick said a while ago that he was sure The Rolling Stones would do more records. Wasn't a terribly long time ago.. (but it was a while ago).

Everyone is spinning the conversation...

I never said that there was a great demand for a new Stones album. I never said their record label wouldn't be more focused on their back catalog. I never said nostalgia wasn't a big part of their act.

All I am saying is I believe they will write, record, and release a new album. Why? .. because basically every tour for the past 35 years has had one. They didn't need to release an album last time either. Licks was plenty successful with out a new album... and however much they played it, or how much ABB sold is irrelevant to my point. Point is they certainly didn't have to... but they did.


*All I am saying is I think they will record and release an album for this tour based on my aforementioned reasons- (nothing more).


Ian
Back to top
 

Thought you were dinner  ...but you were the shark ..
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #63 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 6:49am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Ian Billen wrote on Sep 12th, 2011 at 8:54pm:
Gazza wrote on Sep 12th, 2011 at 7:00am:
Ian Billen wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 12:55am:
Steel Wheels wrote on Sep 8th, 2011 at 4:06pm:
Where's the usual Rocks Off negativity?



_________________________

It's already started (..still though, I love this board dearly). Already many are saying there will be no new album because, oh well...let's see: ...they simply are not into it...or ...there's no time (I guess a full year isn't even enough time for their estimation)...or Mick and Keith don't truly get along well enough...or Keith has writers block....or there is not enough interest to their target audience... or Universal isn't truly interested in a new album because it probably will not sell well... or... they will have flooded the market with too many Stones releases if they release a new studio album (that one, has some substance...still I think they will schedule things accordingly to bypass such a problem) or...Mick will be too busy on his SuperHeavy group and will probably diss The Stones and their recording possibilities... or ... well, never mind...but you get the point Wink


My guess is yes, they will record a new studio album (however possibly it shall be released and as well made available in a "new" way... some how?...? hmmm?) because IMO 1. They would not want to exactly repeat 2002-2003 Licks concept 2. They never wanted to be touted as a touring Nostalgia act....why would they start that role now? 3. Mick and Keith have mentioned getting into the studio with The Stones and/or doing more records with The Stones a few times within the past several months.


Ian



Thats not 'negativity'. It's realism. I apologise for thinking that a Rolling Stones album in 2012 will not be a massive seller, or that their record label would be more focussed on their back catalogue, seeing as thats why they signed them in the first place added to the fact that they already have two multi-disc releases earmarked for 2012.

The fact that I would prefer a studio album means nothing.

You seem to live in a fantasy world, Ian, where you prefer to take selected quotes by Mick and Keith over a period of years at face value. Some of us just happen to be more realistic.


By the way, can you direct me to these recent interviews with Mick where he talked about making a new Stones record?



_____________________________

Mick said a while ago that he was sure The Rolling Stones would do more records. Wasn't a terribly long time ago.. (but it was a while ago).

Everyone is spinning the conversation...

I never said that there was a great demand for a new Stones album. I never said their record label wouldn't be more focused on their back catalog. I never said nostalgia wasn't a big part of their act.

All I am saying is I believe they will write, record, and release a new album. Why? .. because basically every tour for the past 35 years has had one. They didn't need to release an album last time either. Licks was plenty successful with out a new album... and however much they played it, or how much ABB sold is irrelevant to my point. Point is they certainly didn't have to... but they did.


*All I am saying is I think they will record and release an album for this tour based on my aforementioned reasons- (nothing more).


Ian



Think you'll find its you doing the 'spinning', Ian, not 'everyone' else - what with twisting fact-based opinion into 'negativity' and then taking a comment that Mick made ages ago (which you cant recall) into an assumption that there'll be a new record in a few months.

Mick hasnt done that many interviews in the last couple of years until a few weeks ago. I can only assume the interview you're referring to was on the Larry King one he did about 16 months back. In which case, what would you expect him to say on something like that? He's always going to give as diplomatic answer. If he'd said 'no', you can imagine the press shitstorm which would have nullified the whole purpose behind the interview to begin with. Likewise, he's been diplomatic and uncommittal about the Stones in his recent interviews about Superheavy - and even then, look at whats happened with his 'joke' about Keith and the Marquee.

The poor guy would be best advised not to do interviews. Or at least not mention the Stones in them. It appears there's an incredible amount of people- journalists and fans alike - who have at best a tenuous grasp of the concept of 'context'.
Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
Ian Billen
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 1,564
USA
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #64 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 11:12am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Gazza wrote on Sep 13th, 2011 at 6:49am:
Ian Billen wrote on Sep 12th, 2011 at 8:54pm:
Gazza wrote on Sep 12th, 2011 at 7:00am:
Ian Billen wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 12:55am:
Steel Wheels wrote on Sep 8th, 2011 at 4:06pm:
Where's the usual Rocks Off negativity?



_________________________

It's already started (..still though, I love this board dearly). Already many are saying there will be no new album because, oh well...let's see: ...they simply are not into it...or ...there's no time (I guess a full year isn't even enough time for their estimation)...or Mick and Keith don't truly get along well enough...or Keith has writers block....or there is not enough interest to their target audience... or Universal isn't truly interested in a new album because it probably will not sell well... or... they will have flooded the market with too many Stones releases if they release a new studio album (that one, has some substance...still I think they will schedule things accordingly to bypass such a problem) or...Mick will be too busy on his SuperHeavy group and will probably diss The Stones and their recording possibilities... or ... well, never mind...but you get the point Wink


My guess is yes, they will record a new studio album (however possibly it shall be released and as well made available in a "new" way... some how?...? hmmm?) because IMO 1. They would not want to exactly repeat 2002-2003 Licks concept 2. They never wanted to be touted as a touring Nostalgia act....why would they start that role now? 3. Mick and Keith have mentioned getting into the studio with The Stones and/or doing more records with The Stones a few times within the past several months.


Ian



Thats not 'negativity'. It's realism. I apologise for thinking that a Rolling Stones album in 2012 will not be a massive seller, or that their record label would be more focussed on their back catalogue, seeing as thats why they signed them in the first place added to the fact that they already have two multi-disc releases earmarked for 2012.

The fact that I would prefer a studio album means nothing.

You seem to live in a fantasy world, Ian, where you prefer to take selected quotes by Mick and Keith over a period of years at face value. Some of us just happen to be more realistic.


By the way, can you direct me to these recent interviews with Mick where he talked about making a new Stones record?



_____________________________

Mick said a while ago that he was sure The Rolling Stones would do more records. Wasn't a terribly long time ago.. (but it was a while ago).

Everyone is spinning the conversation...

I never said that there was a great demand for a new Stones album. I never said their record label wouldn't be more focused on their back catalog. I never said nostalgia wasn't a big part of their act.

All I am saying is I believe they will write, record, and release a new album. Why? .. because basically every tour for the past 35 years has had one. They didn't need to release an album last time either. Licks was plenty successful with out a new album... and however much they played it, or how much ABB sold is irrelevant to my point. Point is they certainly didn't have to... but they did.


*All I am saying is I think they will record and release an album for this tour based on my aforementioned reasons- (nothing more).


Ian



Think you'll find its you doing the 'spinning', Ian, not 'everyone' else - what with twisting fact-based opinion into 'negativity' and then taking a comment that Mick made ages ago (which you cant recall) into an assumption that there'll be a new record in a few months.

Mick hasnt done that many interviews in the last couple of years until a few weeks ago. I can only assume the interview you're referring to was on the Larry King one he did about 16 months back. In which case, what would you expect him to say on something like that? He's always going to give as diplomatic answer. If he'd said 'no', you can imagine the press shitstorm which would have nullified the whole purpose behind the interview to begin with. Likewise, he's been diplomatic and uncommittal about the Stones in his recent interviews about Superheavy - and even then, look at whats happened with his 'joke' about Keith and the Marquee.

The poor guy would be best advised not to do interviews. Or at least not mention the Stones in them. It appears there's an incredible amount of people- journalists and fans alike - who have at best a tenuous grasp of the concept of 'context'.


_________________________________________________________


I never said the album would be out in a "few months". I don't expect it out until they tour. I'm simply saying it's my belief they will make an album. Didn't say (nor do I necessarily feel) that they will play much of it live.

Just saying I think a new studio album would be on plans to release for the tour ... that's all.


Ian
Back to top
 

Thought you were dinner  ...but you were the shark ..
 
IP Logged
 
DiamondsDisease
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


I accept you, as I am.

Posts: 24
Holland
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #65 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 11:47am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
The "joke" from Mick is one of the best thing he has ever done in an interview. And I hope he will continue with things like this. Even Andrew Oldham couldn't have done it any better, look at all the attention it got. The press immediately picked it up, and fall for it.
All these years we had the diplomatic answers from Mick, and this was his subtle way to fool all of us. One word..Respect!!
Back to top
 

I don't like openings, unless shaved well.
 
IP Logged
 
Some Guy
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 16,085
Atlanta
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #66 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 12:17pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Ian laying down the smack on Gazza this round.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gimmekeef
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 5,759
Ontario Canada
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #67 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 1:04pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Some Guy wrote on Sep 13th, 2011 at 12:17pm:
Ian laying down the smack on Gazza this round.


It aint no Pdog and Riffy..but entertaining none the less..........
Back to top
 

"Runnin Like A Cat In A Thunderstorm"
 
IP Logged
 
sweetcharmedlife
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Do the horrendous to that
if you can

Posts: 11,943
San Mateo
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #68 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 1:24pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Some Guy wrote on Sep 13th, 2011 at 12:17pm:
Ian laying down the smack on Gazza this round.

Take gazza,lay the points. Brian's smile
Back to top
 

I'll shoot it to you straight and look you in the eye
So gimme just a minute and I'll tell you why
 
IP Logged
 
The Wick
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,066
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #69 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 1:29pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
As exciting as it is to see them meeting, I wonder how long it will be before Keith makes his first predictably twat comment about Super Heavy and makes a play on the name like Super Dodgy or something sad like that. Keith never fails to be a twat at the most sensitive times.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AngieBlue
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 792
Gender: female
Q
Reply #70 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 3:10pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
The Wick wrote on Sep 13th, 2011 at 1:29pm:
As exciting as it is to see them meeting, I wonder how long it will be before Keith makes his first predictably twat comment about Super Heavy and makes a play on the name like Super Dodgy or something sad like that. Keith never fails to be a twat at the most sensitive times.


Keith has been interviewed several times lately and hasn't said anything of the kind.  I doubt he does at this point.  When GQ asked him who he thought the Man of the Year should be he said Mick.  If the slam was going to come there was the perfect opportunity and he didn't take it.  Since it appears the Stones are trying to get something going next year, Keith seems to be keeping comments to himself for now.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Teiz
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 573
Almere, Amsterdams ugly twin
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #71 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 3:16pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
But wait for the moment Mick decides to take his side gig on the road...Keef will be all over the place. And he would be right. On the bright side: Super Crappy isn't gonna cost me a dime.  Anyway: good marketing from Mick to confirm the bonus disc for Some Girls in an interview. Keeps moaners like me quiet (and happy).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Some Guy
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 16,085
Atlanta
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #72 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 3:20pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
it's on™.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #73 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 4:05pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Teiz wrote on Sep 13th, 2011 at 3:16pm:
But wait for the moment Mick decides to take his side gig on the road...Keef will be all over the place. And he would be right.



I cant see that happening. I think he's already dismissed the chances of a tour anyway, by cryptically stating that everyone in the band has 'too many other things going on' or something similar.

To be honest, there isnt a market for it. Theyre TOO diverse a bunch to make it feasible. Whilst the CD might sell reasonably, if you were a fan of just one of the 5 acts involved, would you pay a lot of money to see them in concert, knowing that the performer you like is going to have a relatively minor role and that theyre ONLY going to be performing SuperHeavy songs?

Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
lavendar
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,075
Buffalo,NY
Gender: female
Re: Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie Meet In London
Reply #74 - Sep 13th, 2011 at 4:21pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Gazza don't get Mad at me but

OMG WHATTA YA Talkin About !!!?  
I listened to 1 song by Colbie Caillat and wish i would have gone to the show, but wait there still is time  War horses couldn't drag me away So long sucker

I also can't Believe there is truly a RIFF betw Jagger and Richards

I haven't read anything wrong with his book,  is that odd ??
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 13th, 2011 at 4:23pm by lavendar »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Gazza, Voodoo Chile in Wonderland)