Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
Home Help Search Login Register Broadcast Message to Admin(s)


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 33
Send Topic Print
The SuperHeavy Thread (Read 146,403 times)
Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 309
Gender: female
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #50 - May 22nd, 2011 at 12:58pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
uncleson wrote on May 21st, 2011 at 4:20pm:
Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll wrote on May 20th, 2011 at 11:34am:
what an awesome project name since we all know Dave Stewart + Mick Jagger = Super Heavy pile of shit

Perverted Mick  Fuck you Gazza, Will ya?


well, stewart did some great work with ringo. actually, he did.

but stewarts a lightweight, a very-very lightweight, compared to keith.

what a shame keith and mick cant seem to work together again..


“Light weight music for light weight music lovers” would be a better title for this project
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2011 at 1:07pm by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll »  
 
IP Logged
 
left shoe shuffle
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 4,141
Re: Super Heavy
Reply #51 - May 22nd, 2011 at 1:00pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 

..And Superheavy is born


...

by A.R. Rahman on Sunday, May 22, 2011

18 months ago Dave Stewart,  Mick Jagger, Damien Marley, Joss Stone and me experimented at a studio in Los Angeles, trying to write songs which had meaning...We had a couple of more sessions after that tying to perfect every song that was written and presently we have around 16 to 18 songs and all the songs have a world sound by contributions from all of us

Dave's and Mick's incredible musicality and Joss' soul singing, Damien Marley's Jamaican influence and philosophies and me bringing musicality from my world.


It's all too early to talk about this but I guess you guys should know something at least....


facebook.com
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
sweetcharmedlife
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Do the horrendous to that
if you can

Posts: 11,943
San Mateo
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #52 - May 22nd, 2011 at 1:19pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
This will be huge..............In Bombay Interesting stuff Ronnie!
Back to top
 

I'll shoot it to you straight and look you in the eye
So gimme just a minute and I'll tell you why
 
IP Logged
 
Ginda
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


The ghost of Belle Starr

Posts: 926
WA State
Gender: female
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #53 - May 22nd, 2011 at 2:44pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
...

Hate to disagree with your geography work there, scl, but Bombay became Mumbai in 1995. Smiley
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2011 at 3:44pm by Ginda »  

"I am a friend to any brave and gallant outlaw"
 
IP Logged
 
Tumbling Dijs
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


The Stones in a club is
still the ultimate rush.

Posts: 356
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #54 - May 22nd, 2011 at 6:02pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
It's sad, I'm really beginning to believe it's over. Keith has gone too far this time I guess with his stupid book. Attending all these talkshows with those ASS KISSING showmasters to talk about his book, but all he does is being insecure, make stupid remarks and laugh stupid about basicly nothing. He makes no sense at all in all these interviews. Mick on the other hand is always serious and willing to give a serious answer to a question and simply most of the time being honest. Mick is making music and Keith is doing nothing or working for Disney, and he has the GODDAMNED nerves to accuse Mick of selling out. Mick has never talked about Keith wearing a bandana to hide his baldness, never talked about Keith wearing long scarffs to hide his awfull belly, while it would be such an easy shot. Mick just has so much more class. And I think Keith knows this and doesn't know how to handle it. Yes, the more I think about it, the more I think it's over, and I blame Keith for it. Even if they will ever tour again, I won't change my mind about my former hero turning into a spoiled asshole!! Yes, I'm pissed!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lotsajizz
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,818
Rhode Island
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #55 - May 22nd, 2011 at 6:28pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
...because Keith is a a dickhead, self-absorbed, coke-addicted, alcoholic, revisionist......whose done nothing meaningful in decades....and this is from a Keith FAN!!  He's coastin'.....
Back to top
 

"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."  Dr. Johnson.
 
IP Logged
 
sweetcharmedlife
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Do the horrendous to that
if you can

Posts: 11,943
San Mateo
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #56 - May 22nd, 2011 at 6:28pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Ginda wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 2:44pm:
...

Hate to disagree with your geography work there, scl, but Bombay became Mumbai in 1995. Smiley

Next thing your gonna tell me is that Constantinople is now Istanbul. Shocked
Back to top
 

I'll shoot it to you straight and look you in the eye
So gimme just a minute and I'll tell you why
 
IP Logged
 
Ginda
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


The ghost of Belle Starr

Posts: 926
WA State
Gender: female
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #57 - May 22nd, 2011 at 8:06pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Tumbling Dijs wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 6:02pm:
It's sad, I'm really beginning to believe it's over. Keith has gone too far this time I guess with his stupid book. Attending all these talkshows with those ASS KISSING showmasters to talk about his book, but all he does is being insecure, make stupid remarks and laugh stupid about basicly nothing. He makes no sense at all in all these interviews. Mick on the other hand is always serious and willing to give a serious answer to a question and simply most of the time being honest. Mick is making music and Keith is doing nothing or working for Disney, and he has the GODDAMNED nerves to accuse Mick of selling out. Mick has never talked about Keith wearing a bandana to hide his baldness, never talked about Keith wearing long scarffs to hide his awfull belly, while it would be such an easy shot. Mick just has so much more class. And I think Keith knows this and doesn't know how to handle it. Yes, the more I think about it, the more I think it's over, and I blame Keith for it. Even if they will ever tour again, I won't change my mind about my former hero turning into a spoiled asshole!! Yes, I'm pissed!!


I'm with you, Tumbling Dijs.  

Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2011 at 8:10pm by Ginda »  

"I am a friend to any brave and gallant outlaw"
 
IP Logged
 
stonedinaustralia
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


wake up crackers or we
all through!!

Posts: 859
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #58 - May 22nd, 2011 at 9:51pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Ginda wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 8:06pm:
Tumbling Dijs wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 6:02pm:
It's sad, I'm really beginning to believe it's over.... Yes, I'm pissed!!


I'm with you, Tumbling Dijs.  




me too 'tho i don't blame keith quite so much - it's clear to me the last 22 years have been pretty much all about generating $$ and that M & K had pretty much grown apart persoanlly and musically(see keith's claim in Life he hasn't been to Mick's dressing room in all that time - I wonder has Mick been to Keith's??).

Anyway,-who'd have thought it would come to this/


on a lighter note - how short is Dave Stewart !?!



...
...]
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2011 at 10:02pm by stonedinaustralia »  

"you can see it against the girl's crocheted dress"
 
IP Logged
 
andrews27
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Online


Wake up Bowie or we all
through!!

Posts: 1,644
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #59 - May 22nd, 2011 at 11:40pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Ginda wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 2:44pm:
...

Hate to disagree with your geography work there, scl, but Bombay became Mumbai in 1995. Smiley



If the troubadours were killed before they reached it...then it's still Bombay!
Back to top
 

That guy that punched Mick at Altamont...and all the Hell's Angels...all that bad acid let them hear A Bigger Bang!!
 
IP Logged
 
Honky Tonk Man
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 2,272
London
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #60 - May 23rd, 2011 at 12:37am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Damian Marley? Joss Stone? Err... NEXT!   Sad
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
luxury
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 346
Gender: female
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #61 - May 23rd, 2011 at 10:22am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
well I shall be doing cartwheels in the street upon this release...I want to see Mick live
Back to top
 

&&
 
IP Logged
 
Pdog
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 6,130
aTx
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #62 - May 23rd, 2011 at 10:53am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
why do you all think it's over? This type of work has preceeded a tour for the last two decades, icluding the rancour that gets hyped in the media... if it was over, do you think the band would've met for the regular band meeting and recorded music for Stu? They all discussed 2012 tour and decided to warm up in 2011. I'd put good money on them begining recording in the next 9 months. The variable would be, if Mick and Keith are inspired enough to tour any new solo music before getting into the studio for a new Stones record... They can build a tour itinerary and make a record in the early months of 2012, and have recorded solo work and toured without any conflicts.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sweetcharmedlife
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Do the horrendous to that
if you can

Posts: 11,943
San Mateo
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #63 - May 23rd, 2011 at 11:01am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
andrews27 wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 11:40pm:
Ginda wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 2:44pm:
...

Hate to disagree with your geography work there, scl, but Bombay became Mumbai in 1995. Smiley



If the troubadours were killed before they reached it...then it's still Bombay!

Fuck you Gazza, Will ya?
Back to top
 

I'll shoot it to you straight and look you in the eye
So gimme just a minute and I'll tell you why
 
IP Logged
 
Ginda
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


The ghost of Belle Starr

Posts: 926
WA State
Gender: female
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #64 - May 23rd, 2011 at 11:23am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Pdog wrote on May 23rd, 2011 at 10:53am:
why do you all think it's over? This type of work has preceeded a tour for the last two decades, icluding the rancour that gets hyped in the media... if it was over, do you think the band would've met for the regular band meeting and recorded music for Stu? They all discussed 2012 tour and decided to warm up in 2011. I'd put good money on them begining recording in the next 9 months. The variable would be, if Mick and Keith are inspired enough to tour any new solo music before getting into the studio for a new Stones record... They can build a tour itinerary and make a record in the early months of 2012, and have recorded solo work and toured without any conflicts.


IMO, this is entirely different on many levels - health, age and rancor.  I do not believe Keith has another tour in him.  I just don't think he can do it.  Rather than admit to this he will use the excuse that Mick's feelings were hurt and didn't want to tour. 

Corporate meetings will go on.   The tribute to Stu was for Stu - and had it not been for Charlie climbing on board first, I doubt if it would have occurred to the others to participate.

I'll be very happy to be proven wrong.
Back to top
 

"I am a friend to any brave and gallant outlaw"
 
IP Logged
 
Ginda
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


The ghost of Belle Starr

Posts: 926
WA State
Gender: female
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #65 - May 23rd, 2011 at 11:25am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
sweetcharmedlife wrote on May 23rd, 2011 at 11:01am:
andrews27 wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 11:40pm:
Ginda wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 2:44pm:
...

Hate to disagree with your geography work there, scl, but Bombay became Mumbai in 1995. Smiley



If the troubadours were killed before they reached it...then it's still Bombay!

Fuck you Gazza, Will ya?


Nice try.  Now don't make Margie put on her uniform again...
Back to top
 

"I am a friend to any brave and gallant outlaw"
 
IP Logged
 
Tumbling Dijs
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


The Stones in a club is
still the ultimate rush.

Posts: 356
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #66 - May 23rd, 2011 at 3:44pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Ginda wrote on May 23rd, 2011 at 11:23am:
Pdog wrote on May 23rd, 2011 at 10:53am:
why do you all think it's over? This type of work has preceeded a tour for the last two decades, icluding the rancour that gets hyped in the media... if it was over, do you think the band would've met for the regular band meeting and recorded music for Stu? They all discussed 2012 tour and decided to warm up in 2011. I'd put good money on them begining recording in the next 9 months. The variable would be, if Mick and Keith are inspired enough to tour any new solo music before getting into the studio for a new Stones record... They can build a tour itinerary and make a record in the early months of 2012, and have recorded solo work and toured without any conflicts.


IMO, this is entirely different on many levels - health, age and rancor.  I do not believe Keith has another tour in him.  I just don't think he can do it.  Rather than admit to this he will use the excuse that Mick's feelings were hurt and didn't want to tour.  

Corporate meetings will go on.   The tribute to Stu was for Stu - and had it not been for Charlie climbing on board first, I doubt if it would have occurred to the others to participate.

I'll be very happy to be proven wrong.


I agree, beside that, if they would tour next year Mick would need all the time he has preparing and organizing it. We all know he's involved in every little detail of a tour. He won't have time for a new soloproject/group and everything that comes with it. And last but not least, Keith's reaction to this new project of Mick, and he will probably react the way he always does to Mick's soloprojects,  will make thing even worse I'm afraid.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #67 - May 23rd, 2011 at 5:22pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
From a lengthy feature and interview on Dave Stewart in the new issue of UNCUT which is just out :

"We've recorded 30 songs and filmed it". Stewart shows me a video of this unusual supergroup recording, standing next to me and commenting in my ear throughout like we're at a gig. The music is eclectic, with toasting, electro, rock, and Joss Stone and Jagger belting it out. It's like a giant's idea of Screamadelica. "We're called Super Heavy" says Dave. "This is me on steroids".
Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
Brainbell Jangler
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,331
Portland, OR
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #68 - May 23rd, 2011 at 5:42pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
sweetcharmedlife wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 1:19pm:
This will be huge..............In Bombay Interesting stuff Ronnie!

Sunny?
Back to top
 

"The ROLLING STONES are more than just a group--they are a way of life."--Andrew Loog Oldham
 
IP Logged
 
Pdog
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 6,130
aTx
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #69 - May 23rd, 2011 at 6:41pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Ginda wrote on May 23rd, 2011 at 11:23am:
Pdog wrote on May 23rd, 2011 at 10:53am:
why do you all think it's over? This type of work has preceeded a tour for the last two decades, icluding the rancour that gets hyped in the media... if it was over, do you think the band would've met for the regular band meeting and recorded music for Stu? They all discussed 2012 tour and decided to warm up in 2011. I'd put good money on them begining recording in the next 9 months. The variable would be, if Mick and Keith are inspired enough to tour any new solo music before getting into the studio for a new Stones record... They can build a tour itinerary and make a record in the early months of 2012, and have recorded solo work and toured without any conflicts.


IMO, this is entirely different on many levels - health, age and rancor.  I do not believe Keith has another tour in him.  I just don't think he can do it.  Rather than admit to this he will use the excuse that Mick's feelings were hurt and didn't want to tour.  

Corporate meetings will go on.   The tribute to Stu was for Stu - and had it not been for Charlie climbing on board first, I doubt if it would have occurred to the others to participate.

I'll be very happy to be proven wrong.



good points. I too hope you're wrong, and if you turn out to be, i will be the first to not rub it in your face, in fact, I hope we forget about our nervousness now, because it is replaced by tingle...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Voodoo Chile in Wonderland
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


The Stones are back you
bastards!!!!

Posts: 17,957
Wonderland
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #70 - May 23rd, 2011 at 9:11pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Listen, the problem why many fans of the Rolling Stones don't like Mick Jagger's solo stuff is simple: They expect a Rolling Stones album, and it's Mick, not the Rolling Stones
Back to top
 

I only get my rocks off while I'm sleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeping with your girlfriend!!
WWW gerardo.liedo rocksoffmessageboard  
IP Logged
 
left shoe shuffle
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 4,141
Re: Super Heavy
Reply #71 - May 23rd, 2011 at 11:21pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 

Mick Jagger announces new album – with fusion group Super Heavy



...
Mick Jagger, seen here performing at the 2011 Grammy Awards, will play harmonica for his new group
Super Heavy.
 
Lucy Nicholson/Reuters



Angela Hickman  May 23, 2011


What do you call a secret series of jam sessions featuring Mick Jagger, Joss Stone, Dave Stewart, Damian Marley, and A.R. Rahman? Super Heavy, of course. The supergroup — kind of a modern-day Traveling Wilburys — has been a secret for 18 months, but now they’re ready to share what they’ve come up with, and their debut “fusion” album is coming out in September.

“It’s a bit odd,” Jagger told Rolling Stone. “A different kind of record than what people would expect.”

To be fair, it’s hard to believe anyone would have been expecting a record from such a disparate group, so to suggest that it’s “different” is just the tip of the iceberg.

The brainchild of Stewart, a founder of the Eurythmics, Super Heavy — featuring three British musical heavyweights, Bob Marley’s youngest son, and India’s most famous film composer — certainly has a range of influences to draw upon, “from reggae to ballads to Indian songs in Urdu.” It doesn’t sound as if any of the influences include Jagger’s famous voice, though.

Instead, the rock ‘n’ roll machine will put his famous mouth to work in a different pursuit: the harmonica. Jagger, who also plays some guitar, decided to leave the singing to the others and work to provide some “high energy” mouth organ accompaniment instead.

The group has no plans yet for a tour, although Jagger has said the door isn’t closed to the idea. Maybe he’s thinking his new group would be a nice compliment to his old band. Although the Stones haven’t toured since 2007, next year marks the 50-year anniversary of their first concert in London, in July 1962, and Stones’ guitarist Keith Richards has already expressed a desire to tour.

The Rolling Stones featuring Super Heavy? That would be something to see.

National Post


So Ms. Hickman has gleaned that Rolling Stones lead singer Mick Jagger will play harp and guitar in support of the other vocalists in Super Heavy.

Clearly on a vacuous roll, she also reckons that a commingling of his bands might be in order...
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Pdog
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 6,130
aTx
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #72 - May 24th, 2011 at 12:07am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
as Stones fans, were kinda of only looking at this from our POV, but i'm sure this is exciting news to fans of the other artists involved, and not b/c it's with Mick Jagger, but because they are making new music.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chris girard
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Blues lover

Posts: 51
Retired & happy
Gender: male
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #73 - May 24th, 2011 at 12:07pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
I think we need to face a reality here, Mick, Charlie and Ronnie have successful lives outside of the Stones. Charlie is playing jazz each summer and touring Europe. He certainly isn't doing it for the money, he is playing in small jazz clubes. He is doing it because he loves it, he's a true musican. Ronnie has cleaned up his act, is hosting a very successful radio program and he has said many times he makes more money selling his paintings than from the Stones royalities. He has a new girlfriend, plays some special gigs now, looks and seems to be pretty happy.  Mick is working with Dave Stwart again, and Keith wasn't invited into this "super Group". Mick is working on a movie, is active in the social scene and has built a life outside ot constant touring and being the Rolling Stones.

The one person who has not built a life outside the Stones is Keith. I read parts of his book and they come off to me as vindictive in some places and childish in others. It seems his point was to show how he stood up to Mick at times. I'm not surprised Mick is bit pissed at his treatment in the book. Keith can't deal with the fact that the Stones, as great as they were, are not contemporary any more. They probably can't fill up a staidum any more and who is going to pay $250 a ticket in this economy.

I certainly don't think badly of Mick with working with other people. I've never seen anyone on this board critiize Charlie for working with other and same can be said for Ronnie.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polytoxic
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 226
Re: Mick's "Secret" Album - Super Heavy
Reply #74 - May 24th, 2011 at 1:20pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
On the upside at least Lenny Kravitz is nowhere to be found.   stu-smiling
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 33
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Gazza, Voodoo Chile in Wonderland)