|
LadyJane
|
From Gasland via Shidoobee: ________________________________________________________________________________ ______________ Some very interesting new Stones news!
I've been in touch with a couple of my closest insiders in the last few days and have heard some very interesting new news on the Boys for next year. Because of one of the things I was told, I cannot tell you who said what to me, other than this news was confirmed as being as close to the truth as it could be, this coming from two different insiders in the last week.
First, I'm not going in any order here, just as I type it all out...
On a new Stones studio album..... Yes, we were told by both Keith and Mick that work would be started on a new studio LP around this time. Yet the insiders are now saying it isn't going to happen at all - other than maybe a possibly of a Tattoo You type of new L.P. That's it. So you got to wonder what happened to all those new songs Keith talked about?
Tour for 2011..... They are still working on plans for it, but... the 2011 tour has problems right now. Some are starting to say that the Stones just want to wait till 2012 to tour. Seems they can't decided at the moment which venues (size wise) they want to use, with over-head costs getting in the way. The band can't decide how long they want to tour for either - if they should do some short dates in '11 here and there, ones that would run for a few weeks and then end for a few more weeks and then start up again, and then go back out and do more short dates in the same way for the '12 tour. Seems the band is split on wanting to do this verses doing one long tour. My guess is Keith would be against such a few weeks at a time deal and MJ is for it (but that is only me guessing here, and since short dates would cost them more in overhead, if you look at it in that light, MJ would be against such a move, you would think). Then finally, should they just do a one year tour on two continents, or 2 years on four continents?.... So yes, they are still talking about a tour, but the questions remain if they will still pull one off in '11 or not. Insides are guessing late in '11 they will start up and run through '12 with it and just end up touring as they did in the past with no real breaks. But again, that is a guess relayed to me by one of my two main insiders who is hearing this from others. One thing for sure, planning such a tour is a lot of work, and they are still planning a new tour. Only question is - for '11, or for '12?
Here is the most interesting and strange piece of news yet! This is the bit I was told about where I can't say who told me this because few know about this and the ones that do aren't sure what it means. Anyway, the band got together about a week ago in the UK to discuss the possibilities of a 2011 Tour and to find out where things were. Since 1994, "the band" always meant Mick, Keith, Charlie & Ronnie. But - at this 2011 Tour meeting, Bill Wyman was in attendance!! Those close to the band are not sure what this means. It might not mean anything at all other than Bill was visiting with Mick and ended up in attendance at the meeting (MJ and BW are still close friends to this day and they still visit with each other from time to time). But the fact nobody inside the Stones camp wants anyone to know about this - well could that mean something? Would Bill be back on board for some dates? Also as I have noted in the past, the Stones will leak news like this to folks like myself and Stonesdoug just to stir up excitement. I'm not sure what Stonesdoug has heard on this, but Bill was at that meeting, and that's all I know. So yes, it's very interesting news to say the least; and all I can say is, too bad MT wasn't at the meeting too! I and most fans would love to see all six of of them together again on this tour!
In a closing note, I learned some very interesting tidbits about a few falsehoods reported in Keith's new book, which I'm not ready to talk about yet, since I still haven't finished reading the entire book (I'm almost done). So sometime after Xams I'll get back on this. But just so you know, it isn't anything that big, just proof that Keef, regardless of what he claims, doesn't remember everything correctly, or at the least, he likes to change history around a bit. I know, Mr Riffhard changing Stones history around is old news to us old Stones fans, but when you have people who he wrote about saying what he wrote wasn't how the story went down, well, what can you say to that? Again, I'll talk about this in more detail when I review the book here after Xmas. Cheers to all, Keno. ________________________________________________________________________________ ___
Bottom line: time will tell.
|