Gazza wrote on Aug 29
th, 2010 at 9:30am:
Ian Billen wrote on Aug 28
th, 2010 at 11:21pm:
Hmmmph well I knew "Goin Home" had to be it.
I do not count medley's or bonus stuff that is not really a song but are just peices of music added ( such as Stu's Piano playing at the end of Dirty Work. I mean actual songs from studio recordings. I am not speaking of live material either. Hence in my opinion on "She Said Yeah" is pretty darn close.
Thanks and Props to Gazza. I seriously don't know how this guy does it? Do you have a data-base you can query based on certain criteria? Do you scrounge the internet? Do you have a program of some sort to assist you in always coming up with these "read outs"? Simply curious and thankful.
Ian
LOL. Nope. Much easier than that, Ian. I just switched on my i-tunes, typed in 'Rolling Stones' and arranged for the songs to be listed in length order.
Very good guess on 'She Said Yeah'. I knew it was short, but didnt realise it was THAT short.
_______________________
ahhh the ipod eh? well...whatever works. I didn't know SSY was quite THAT short either. It is more a minute and a half for cryin out loud than a two minute song. I was thinking say 1:56 or something.
Off topic, I saw on IORR how you stated to a poster in that ABB wasn't marketed/promoted much. I felt the same way for the most part. The poster stated that it was possibly promoted more than any Stones album since Tattoo You and the person gave some very credible points as to why it was.
The thing is ....why didn't we hear about it? I saw for Voodoo Lounge they would have a whole page advertisement on the album in Rolling Stone. This time out, I didn't see anything like that. It was almost a bit "boot-leggish" in how it was released and the look of the cover and things. It wasn't to "look" commercial at all.
Was this the whole concept of a bigger Bang? Little production and very stripped down in the studio. No pop influence at all this time out. I am thinking promoting/marketing the album went against the albums concept. It was supposed to be no fluff, no bull, and stripped down to hard core basics. However, the record company would probably care less on that aspect and just would push the album regardless in hopes to getting it sold one way or another. Still it doesn't seem as though much was put forth, regardless of the points brought up on IORR.
Maybe the concept was to have it as real to the core concept of the recording as possible. It still sold 3.5 million copies and marketing it wasn't going to drive those numbers up much anyway possibly. Possibly the record company had that notion and treated it "as is".
I certainly understand major labels don't really work like (well normally they don't that I have ever heard of) that BUT it is something to ponder. Maybe they figured they would only get 3 mill or so anyway so why waste money on marketing something that was supposed to be a non-commercial affair (not really many radio friendly tunes this time, stripped down, hardly any tricky production etc. etc.) for the most part. Maybe they knew the writing on the wall in this day and age and figured ...keep it true to it's form.
Hmmm?
Ian