Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board

Free optional entertainment since (at least) 14 July 1998
...
Today 6/6/2026
The "Diablos Rojos" team debuted their new commemorative uniform for their upcoming special edition release of "Foreign Tongues."
Alfredo Harp Helú Stadium, Mexico City – 6/6/2026 © Diablos Rojos del México with thanks to Rogerriffin! (lick for more)

...
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
Home Help Search Login Register Broadcast Message to Admin(s)


Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26
Send Topic Print
Keith Richards - Life (Read 127,557 times)
Heart Of Stone
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules

Posts: 4,001
Charlottetown Prince Edward Is
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #175 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 11:17am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Thanks LSS, that book is going be a treat to read.
Back to top
 

The Rolling Stones ain't just a group, their a way of life-Andrew Loog Oldham.
......[URL=http://s6.photobucket.com/user/merrillm123/media/69inLA.jpg.html]
WWW Merrill Moran  
IP Logged
 
sweetcharmedlife
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Do the horrendous to that
if you can

Posts: 11,943
San Mateo
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #176 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 11:51am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Thanks to Steel Wheels for posting and Lefty for including pics.LOL. Yeah this is going to be a good read. Are you fucking serious?
Back to top
 

I'll shoot it to you straight and look you in the eye
So gimme just a minute and I'll tell you why
 
IP Logged
 
left shoe shuffle
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 4,141
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #177 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 11:55am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 

Great shots from today's issue of The Times:

...

...
Phil Fisk


The interview that accompanies those photos can be read by on-line subscribers only.  

The Daily Mail nicked a few of the juicier tidbits, though...  Roll Eyes
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 15th, 2010 at 12:40pm by left shoe shuffle »  

...
 
IP Logged
 
gimmekeef
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 5,759
Ontario Canada
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #178 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 2:17pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
A Billboard online article I just found:

Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards says in his new autobiography that Mick Jagger became unbearable over the years and reveals he also calls the imperious lead singer "Your Majesty" and "Brenda."

The memoir is peppered with references to other celebrities -- from Johnny Depp to John Lennon -- but it is the prickly dynamic between Richards and Jagger that dominates the 527-page book, which is to be serialized in The Times newspaper.  

Richards, 66, who met Jagger at the age of four, says he has not stepped foot in Jagger's dressing room in 20 years.

"It was the beginning of the Eighties when Mick started to become unbearable," Richards writes in the memoir, "Life," which brought him an advance of 4.8 million pounds ($7.7 million) after a massive bidding war among publishers.

Richards and Jagger were two of the Stones' founding members in 1962 and wrote its hit songs, leading the group to sales of more than 200 million albums worldwide.

"Sometimes I think: 'I miss my friend,'" Richards writes. "I wonder: 'where did he go?'"

But Richards told the Times that his bandmate had read the book and wanted to take out only one thing -- a reference to Jagger using a voice coach.

Richards refused, saying: "I'm trying to say the truth here."

He added about Jagger: "We've had our beefs but, hey, who doesn't? You try and keep something together for 50 years," adding the band was considering going on tour again.

"I think it's going to happen. I've had a chat with ... Her Majesty. Brenda."

The band's last tour ended in August 2007, sparking the customary speculation that there would be no more.

STAR-STUDDED LIFE

Richards is similarly frank about other big names. He said he had long failed to recognize Depp when the Oscar-nominated star had been hanging out with his son for two years.

"Then one day he was at dinner, and I'm like, 'Whoa!' Scissorhands!"

Depp, who played the lead role in the 1990 movie "Edward Scissorhands," credits Richards for inspiring his character Captain Jack Sparrow in the Pirates of the Caribbean films, and the two are currently shooting the series' fourth installment, where Richards reprises his role as Sparrow's father.

Richards also throws in a few choice remarks on the Beatles' Lennon: "Johnny. A silly sod, in many ways," he writes.

"I don't think John ever left my house, except horizontally."

He describes finding Lennon lying by the toilet, mumbling: "Don't move me - these tiles are beautiful."

Richards himself is famous for his insatiable appetite for drugs, although he gave up heroin in 1978 after a fifth drug bust and stopped using cocaine after a 2006 fall in Fiji forced him to undergo brain surgery.

He said he does not regret his exploits.

"I loved a good high. And if you stay up, you get the songs that everyone else misses because they're asleep," Richards said.

During his addict days in the 1960s and 1970s, he spent a decade on the "People Most Likely to Die List."

"Well, I'm not putting death on the agenda," he told the Times. "I don't want to see my old friend Lucifer just yet."

"Life" is published on October 26.

(Reporting by Anna Yukhananov; Editing by Steve Addison)

Back to top
 

"Runnin Like A Cat In A Thunderstorm"
 
IP Logged
 
Holden
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,317
Tampa Bay
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #179 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 4:04pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
I loved a good high. And if you stay up, you get the songs that everyone else misses because they're asleep.

What a great fuckin' quote!
Back to top
 

...
mrhipfl  
IP Logged
 
a.completeunknown
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 84
Richards: Mick Jagger was "unbearable"
Reply #180 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 4:33pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #181 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 5:36pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
...
Caitlin Moran Last updated October 15 2010 12:02AM

To introduce the exclusive serialisation of his memoir, which begins in The Times tomorrow, Keith Richards talks to Caitlin Moran about the girls, the drugs and his rift with Jagger (and the truth about Mick’s manhood)
)

I meet Keith Richards on International Talk Like a Pirate Day.

It feels only right to inform him of this.

“International Talk Like a Pirate Day?” Richards says, with his wolfy grin, wholly amused. “Arrrghh! Arrrhhh! Oh, I can’t do it without the eyepatch,” he sighs, mock-petulantly.

“I can’t speak like a pirate without an eyepatch. Or being pissed — Hargh! Hargh!”

But of course, he can: to be frank, everything Keith Richards says is in the cadence of Pirate. With his black eyes, bandanna and earring, even at 67, he has the air of a rakish gentleman forced to steal a frigate and abscond from polite society — due to some regrettable misunderstanding about a virgin daughter, a treasure map and a now-smouldering Admiralty building. You can see why he was the inspiration for Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean. Richards apparently taught Depp how to walk around a corner, drunk: “You keep your back to the wall at all times.”

Today, Richards is a pirate in onshore mode. The mood is tavernish. Even though we are in the Royal Suite at Claridge’s, which has a grand piano (“Shall I have a go? You can bootleg it — hargh! hargh! hargh!”) and so many rooms that we never even go in half of them, Richards still brings an air of a man who has left his parrot, cutlass and Smee in the hallway — lest he need to make a quick getaway. On walking into the room he spots me and does a double-take.

“I had no idea I was going to talk to a lady,” he says, ordering a vodka and orange. “I need a drink when I do that.”

Spotting a packet of Marlboro on the table, he eschews them and brings out his own supplies.

“Those are the ones that say they’ll kill you,” he says, pointing at the pack on the table with its large “Smoking kills” label. “They are English, and they would kill you; they’re bloody awful.”

“Are they different to American ones?” I ask.

“Oh yes. You take them apart, if you’re going to roll a hash joint, and there’s bits of stalk and crap in there. It’s unacceptable to a smoker.”

He takes one of his own out of his pocket and lights it. The smell of the smoke mingles with his cologne.

“What have you got on?” I inquire.

“I’ve got a hard-on — I didn’t know you could smell it,” he says — and then starts laughing again, in a fug of smoke. “That’s a rock’n’roll joke — one of Jerry Lee Lewis’s,” he explains, almost apologetically. “We’re at the Rock’n’Roll Hall of Fame, and Jerry’s got his rig on — frilly shirt and tuxedo — and he’s coming down the steps, and this chick rushed out and was like: ‘You smell great — what have you got on?’ And Jerry says: ‘I’ve got a hard on — I didn’t know you could smell it.’ Pure rock’n’roll.”

Keith takes another drag on his fag, beaming.

“’Ere,” he says, suddenly concerned, looking at the cigarette smoke. “I hope you’re not ... allergic.”

Apologising for a hard-on joke and worrying that a journalist might develop a tickly cough from passive smoking is a long way from Richards’s interviews in his outlaw heyday — he once spent 40 sleepless hours with the NME journalist Nick Kent “pinballing” around London in a Ferrari and consuming ferocious quantities of cocaine and heroin — a cocktail quaintly referred to, by Richards, as “the breakfast of champions”.

But then, Richards has mellowed considerably over the years — possibly out of necessity, if one considers how difficult it would be to parallel-park in modern-day London on a 1.5mg speedball. He gave up heroin in 1978, after his fifth bust, and he reveals today that he’s finally given up cocaine, too — in 2006, after he fell from a tree in Fiji and had to have brain surgery.

“Yeah — that was cocaine I had to give up for that,” he says, with a sigh. “You’re like: ‘I’ve got the message, oh Lord.’ ” He raps on the metal plate in his head. It makes a dull, thonking sound.

“I’ve given up everything now — which is a trip in itself,” he says, with the kind of Robert Newton-esque eye-roll that indicates how interesting merely getting out of bed sober can be after 40 years of caning it. Not that Richards is disapproving of getting high, of course: “I’m just waiting for them to invent something more interesting, ha ha ha,” he says. “I’m all ready to road-test it, when they do.”

Richards’s image is of the last man standing at the long party that was the Sixties — and the man who’d invited everyone over in the first place, anyway. During his junkie years Richards spent more than a decade on the “People Most Likely to Die” list — “I used to read it, check I was still on there. I was on it longer than anyone else. Badge of honour, hur hur.”

But having spent from 1968 to 1978 with everyone expecting him to keel over in a hotel (“which I never did: it’s the height of impoliteness to turn blue in someone else’s bathroom,” as the classic Richards quote has it), he has now, ironically, gone on to be one of those people we now think will just live for ever. His tough, leathery, indestructible air gives the suggestion that heroin, whisky and cocaine, when taken in large enough quantities, have a kind of preservative quality. Richards has been cured in a marinade of pharmaceuticals. He both exudes the aura of and bears an undeniable physical resemblance to the air-dried mummies of Chachapoyas.

“Well, I’m not putting death on the agenda,” he says, with another grin. “I don’t want to see my old friend Lucifer just yet. He’s the guy I’m gonna see, isn’t it? I’m not going to the Other Place, let’s face it.”

We’re here today because — having resolutely, persistently and, in many ways, unfeasibly — not died, Richards has finally published his autobiography, Life. When he announced the project, he was subject to a massive bidding war that ended with him getting a £4.8 million advance — acknowledgement of the fact that, barring Bowie or McCartney deciding to write their stories, Richards’s was the motherlode in terms of understanding that most incredible of decades — the Sixties — from the inside, recounted by one of the very people pinballing the psychedelic charabanc off the bounds of “decent” society.

“Have you read it?” he asks — trying to look casual, but unable to suppress an incongruous note of eagerness.

“Oh God, yes,” I say. “Oh man, it’s a total hoot. Really, really amazing.”

“Oh good,” he says, relaxing. “You know, you start off thinking you can spin a few yarns — and by the time you get to the end of it, it’s turned into something much more. One memory triggers another, and before you know it, there’s 600 rounds per second coming out.”

“Did you want to write your version because other books on you and the Stones had got it wrong?” I ask.

“I read Bill Wyman’s book, but after three or four chapters — where he’s going [assumes dull, priggish Wyman monotone], ‘And by that point, I only had £600 left in Barclays Bank’, I was like, ‘Oh, Bill’. You know what I mean? You’re far more interesting than that; do me a favour. And Mick attempted it once, and ended up giving the money back. It was ten, fifteen years ago, and e’d keep ringing up and going [does Mick impression], “ ’Ere, what were we doing on August 15, 196-somefink?’ I’d be like, “Mick, you’re writing it. I can’t remember.’ And knowing Mick, there would have been a morass of blank chapters — because there would have been a lot of stuff he would have wanted to put to one side, hur hur.”

Richards is dismissive of Stones books written by non-Stones — claiming the authors would have been “too scared” to write the truth: “Who’s really going to put Mick Jagger or Keith Richards up against a wall and say: ‘I demand you answer this?’ ” he says, eyes suddenly flashing black.

“Because, you know . . .” He takes a drag on his fag. “... you end up dead like that.”

The reason Life attracted such a bidding war is because the life of Keith Richards and the Stones is one that — even in today’s modern, anything-goes pop-cultural climate — takes in a still astonishing amount of, for want of a better word, scandal. “Would you let your daughter go with a Rolling Stone?”, the Redlands bust, Marianne Faithfull in her fur rug, “Who breaks a butterfly on a wheel?”, the still controversial death of Brian Jones, the Hell’s Angels running amok at Altamont, the Marianne Faithfull/Mick Jagger/Anita Pallenberg/Richards four-way love-rectangle, numerous arrests, heroin, cocaine, acid, whisky, infidelity, groupies, Margaret Trudeau, riots, billions of dollars, and four decades of sweaty fans, screaming without end.

And, at the centre of it all, arguably the greatest rock’n’roll band that ever existed. Gimme Shelter, Jumpin’ Jack Flash, You Can’t Always Get What You Want, Wild Horses, Brown Sugar, Start Me Up, Sympathy for the Devil, Satisfaction — each one with the ability alone to answer the question, “Mummy, what is rock’n’roll?”, and, when taken en masse, the reason why Keith Richards is referred to, almost factually, as “the Human Riff”.

For those expecting an explosive story, Life certainly doesn’t disappoint: it opens in 1975, with Richards in a diner in Fordyce, Arkansas, about to be busted for the fourth time. Written like a Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas with infinitely more resources for getting wasted — he is driving to the next gig because he’s “bored” with the Stones’ private jet — it joins him at the high point of his caner years.

As Richards describes it, he is the sole long-haired man in a room full of rednecks, and is basically wearing a hat made of drugs (“There was a flap at the side in which I’d stowed hash, Tuinals and coke”) and driving a car made of drugs (“I’d spent hours packing the side-panel with coke, grass, peyote and mescaline”).

High on cocaine (“Merck cocaine — the fluffy, pharmaceutical blow”, as he describes it, lovingly), Richards is arrested, dragged to the courthouse and becomes the centre of an international news incident (“There were 5,000 Stones fans outside the courthouse”) — until Jagger sweet-talks the local governor and bails him out.

“Mick was always good with the locals,” Richards writes, half-admiringly, half-condescendingly — like a pirate captain commending a handsome cabin-boy who has the ability to “talk posh” to the gentry.

The following 527 pages scarcely let up from there. Things tail off in the mid-Eighties — as they invariably do in the stories of Sixties icons. By then they have retired from the eye of the storm to their mansions and are merely watching Madonna from the sidelines, puzzled. But the first half of Life, up until 1984, is in a league of its own. As rock memoirs go, only Bob Dylan’s imperial, awe-inspiring Chronicles can beat it.

Sitting in Richards’s agent’s office, reading it — the secrecy around it is immense; I have to sign confidentiality agreements before I can even see the manuscript — was like getting into a Tardis and being witness to events only previously recounted by hearsay.

One of the first stories is one of the most amazing — Richards quoting from a letter he sent his aunt in 1961: “This morning on Dartford station a guy I knew at primary school came up to me. He’s got every record Chuck Berry ever made. He is called Mick Jagger.” It’s like discovering Cleopatra’s page-a-day diary and the entry: “Tuesday, 4.30pm: meeting with Mark Antony.”

And so it goes on from there — recruiting all the Stones one by one, Bill Wyman sighingly tolerated because he has a better amp than anyone else. They work hard, but it comes ridiculously easy: the first song they ever write together — locked in the kitchen by their manager until they come up with something — is As Tears Go By, which both goes to No 1 and bags Jagger the beautiful Marianne Faithfull as a girlfriend. They buy houses. They buy drugs. Here’s the Redlands bust, recounted by the man who owned the house: casually mentioning another guest — David Schidermann, the acid dealer. As the inventor of both Strawberry Fields acid and Purple Haze acid, Schidermann dosed the charts with two of the greatest psychedelic singles ever made.

Richards can tell us the Faithfull/ Mars Bar story is a myth — but adds, casually, that he was the man who left a Mars Bar on the coffee table, as a snack, for when he was stoned.

Here’s John Lennon — “Johnny. A silly sod, in many ways” — coming round with Yoko and keeling over in the bathroom. “I don’t think John ever left my house, except horizontally,” Richards sighs, having found Lennon — godhead for a generation — lying by the toilet, murmuring, “Don’t move me — these tiles are beautiful”.

On another night with Lennon, Richards tries to explain to him where the Beatles — the f***ing Beatles! — have been going wrong all these years: “You wear your guitar too high. It’s not a violin. No wonder you don’t swing. No wonder you can rock, but not roll.”

Redlands burns to the ground, and Richards — high — escapes with only “a cutlass, and a box of goodies. F*** the passports.”

Allen Ginsberg — the high priest of beatnik — is regarded as a bit of a twat: coming over to Richards’s house, he “plays a concertina and makes ‘Ommmmmm’ sounds,” as Richards relates, still sounding beleaguered by an unwelcome house guest 30 years later. Brian Jones is dismissed as little more than “a wife-beater”.

In this rollercoaster blur, Altamont — where the Hell’s Angels, high on LSD and speed, stab Meredith Hunter to death — is merely an incidental point. For generations of lazy documentary makers, it has been seen as the point when the Sixties turned sour, the moment that flower power idealism died, the undeniable beginning of the darkness.

To the man on stage at the time, however, playing Under My Thumb as Hunter dies, it’s a story that merits little more than two paragraphs. The first Stones fan to die had been back in the mid-1960s — plunging from the balcony of the hall. By 1969 Richards had seen it all. He couldn’t be surprised by anything.

But for all the drugs, car chases, jets, stadiums, presidents, fist fights and deaths, the core of Life is a small, human, timeless story. The story of Richards’s life revolves around two things: the friend he never quite understands, and the girl who got away: bandmate Mick Jagger, and his former wife, and the mother of three of his children, Anita Pallenberg.

Reading Life, I was shocked by how candid Richards is about his relationship with both Jagger and Pallenberg. Indeed, I gasped at two of the stories. My thought, as I read them, was: “Keith Richards, you’re going to be in trouble.”

“In trouble?” Richards says, laughing. “Why?”

Well, let’s take Jagger. You reveal that your secret nickname for him is “Your Majesty” or “Brenda” — and that you openly had conversations with the other Stones, in front of Mick, referring to “that bitch Brenda”. Your review of Jagger’s solo album Goddess in the Doorway — which you refer to as Dogshit on the Doorstep — is, “It’s like Mein Kampf — everyone had it, but no one read it”. You describe an annoying pet mynah bird as “like living with Mick”.

There’s a chapter that starts: “It was the beginning of the Eighties when Mick started to become unbearable.” There are quotes such as: “Mick plays harmonica from the heart — but he doesn’t sing like that”; “Mick Jagger is aspiring to be Mick Jagger”; “I think Mick thinks I belong to him”; “I used to love Mick, but I haven’t been to his dressing room in 20 years. Sometimes I think: ‘I miss my friend.’ I wonder: ‘Where did he go?’”

Has Jagger read the book?

Richards seems resolutely unfazed.

“Yeah,” he says equanimously. “I think it opened his eyes a bit, actually.”

“Were there any bits he asked you to leave out?” I ask.

He starts laughing again. “Wurgh wurgh wurgh.” It sounds like a crow stuck in a chimney.

“Yeah! Funnily enough, it was the weirdest thing he wanted taken out. I mean, look. You know, I love the man. I’ve know him since I was four years old, right. But the bit he wanted taken out was how he used a voice coach.”

“Really?”

“Yeah! And everyone knew it anyway. It’s been in a million interviews, but for some reason, he was like: ‘You know — could we leave that out?’ And I went: ‘No! I’m trying to say the truth here.’”

I pause for a minute. I clear my throat.

“So he didn’t ask you to take out the bit about how small his cock is, then?” I ask, in a rather prim voice.

“Hey — I was only told that by others,” Richards says, with a wolfish smile and a shrug.

This is the height of disingenuousness, because the “other” to whom Richards is referring is Faithfull — Jagger’s girlfriend at the time — and a story that is one of the key “Oh, my God!” moments of the book.

Rumours have long circled about just what was going on in 1969 — the year the world’s two most glamorous couples were Keith Richards and Anita Pallenberg and Mick Jagger and Marianne Faithfull.

As Pallenberg and Jagger start work on Performance, in their roles of lovers, Richards is convinced that the director Nicolas Roeg — whom he hates — is trying to get the two together for real so that he can have “hardcore pornography” in his film.

In one of the most evocatively written passages in the book, Richards describes how the jealousy and fear that he’s losing Pallenberg to Jagger, coupled with his escalating heroin abuse, results in him writing Gimme Shelter on a filthy, stormy day — staring out of the window of his house, waiting for the sound of Pallenberg’s car. It never arrives. She doesn’t come home that night. He presumes she lies in his bandmate’s bed.

“War/ Children/ It’s just a shot away,” the guest singer Merry Clayton sings, voice breaking, on what is arguably the Stones’ greatest song. “Rape/ Murder/ Love, sister/ It’s just a kiss away.”

Partly in retaliation, Richards then goes about bedding Faithfull. Despite the undeniable dark, fratricidal overtones of screwing Jagger’s girlfriend, Richards’s account of it in Life is recounted in pirate tavern mode, concluding with his joy at having “my head nestled between those two beautiful jugs”.

When Faithfull and Richards hear Jagger returning home, Richards jumps out of the window, like Robin Askwith in Confessions of a Window Cleaner, leaving his socks and his cuckolded bandmate’s girlfriend behind him. As a final stab, 40 years later, Richards adds: “[Marianne] had no fun with [Mick’s] tiny todger. I know he’s got an enormous pair of balls — but it doesn’t quite fill the gap.”

For a Stones fan, it’s a real double-or-quits moment. On the one hand, as a description of what it’s like to be inside a legendary song as it make landfall, Richards’s recollections of writing Gimme Shelter are without parallel. On the other hand, there is the massive risk that — after reading the chapter — every subsequent listening of the song will be haunted by the image of Jagger’s allegedly tiny todger nestled on a pair of gigantic testicles.

It’s one of those side-effects of rock’n’roll that no one ever warns you about.

“Well, I did say he had enormous balls,” Richards says now, generously. “I’m sure he’s had worse thrown at him by women. I mean, Jerry Hall pretty much decimated him anyway.”

“It does seem like you’re trying to ... wind him up,” I say.

“We’ve had our beefs but, hey, who doesn’t? You try and keep something together for 50 years,” Richards says, palpably not caring.

There is similar, breathtaking candour in his recounting of his relationship with Pallenberg. In a physically abusive relationship with fellow Stone Brian Jones, Pallenberg has the hots for Richards, and Richards has the hots for Pallenberg. When Jones is taken to hospital with asthma, Richards and Pallenberg end up together in a car, being driven from Barcelona to Valencia. Without a word ever being exchanged, Pallenberg kicks off their relationship by silently unzipping Richards’s jeans and giving him a blowjob.

“I remember the smell of the orange trees in Valencia,” Richards writes, still sounding post-coital 40 years later. “When you get laid by Anita Pallenberg for the first time, you remember things.”

“Oh — the great blowjob in the car?” he says today, when I bring it up — again, quite primly.

“What was your chauffeur doing all this time?” I ask, incredulously.

“He’s got to keep his eyes on the road,” Richards shrugs. “I should imagine he was going, ‘About time,’ to be honest. It had been in the air for ages.”

Although it was Richards who eventually called time on the marriage, when Pallenberg’s subsequent heroin addiction got out of hand, she still comes across as “unfinished business” in Life — with Richards repeatedly addressing Pallenberg directly from the pages, calling on her to think of what would have happened if they’d managed to stay together, in rocking chairs together, “watching the grandkids”. Although Richards is now married to, and has two children with, Patti Hansen, Pallenberg recurs throughout the book like perfume; melody; a ghost. While Richards rails at Jagger, he sighs over Pallenberg. The girl that gave herself away.

Perhaps you keep coming back to Anita and Mick, I suggest to Richards, because as an artist, there’s nothing to say about the people you love and understand. It’s the ones who mystify you that you need to write songs and books about. That’s how you try to figure them out.

“Yeah,” he nods. “You’ve got nothing to say when it’s all understood.”

It’s the best inference to make — any other suggests that Richards is still a little in love with the woman whose clothes he’s wearing on the cover of Their Satanic Majesties Request.

At 67, having come into life-transforming wealth and fame in one of the most controversial bands of the counter-cultural era, it would be easy to assume that Richards became a pirate because of rock’n’roll — around the time the Stones went out on the road, and never really came back: “A pirate nation, moving under our own flag, with lawyers, clowns and attendants.”

But the other revelation of Life is that this was how Richards was raised: he has always been a pirate. He describes postwar Dartford as somewhere where “everyone’s a thief”. Dartford, where the highwaymen would hold up the stage to London; explosions from the fireworks factory “would take out the windows for miles around”; and patients from the lunatic asylum would regularly abscond.

“In the morning you’d find a loony on the heath, in his little nightshirt,” Richards recalls, fondly.

His family were not respectable or God-fearing. They numbered musicians, actors and prostitutes: his mother would “cross the road” to avoid the priest, and divorced his father to marry a younger lover.

Richards’s mother, Doris, was a classic working-class matriarch — her last words to her son, as he played to her on her deathbed, were : “You’re out of tune”. And as an only child of a poor, bohemian couple, the only things Richards was brought up to respect were the local library and music. When he got his first guitar, he slept with it in his bed.

Twenty years later, guests to Redlands recall Richards’s guitar collection being on every sofa and chair, and being left with nowhere to sit but the floor.

So when you come and talk to Keith Richards, this is who you feel you are meeting: not a millionaire Rolling Stone, with houses in Suffolk, Connecticut and the Turks and Caicos islands, but the guy from Dartford who would always have been out of kilter with normal society, however his life had turned out. You get the very strong feeling that this is what Richards would be like even if we were down the pub, instead of Claridge’s, and he had got there on the bus — not least because his bandanna is, on closer inspection, quite grubby, and he’s wearing a pair of shattered trackie bottoms and the kind of incongruously bright turquoise trainers you often see on meths-drinking tramps.

Ask him about his daughter — 24-year-old Alexandra — doing a nude shoot for Playboy, and he seems truly baffled by the notion that he could have been disapproving. “You know — my girls are like me,” he says. “They try to avoid work as much as possible, hee hee hee. A bit of modelling is a bit of freedom. Hey, baby — with a frame like that, flaunt it.”

The story of how he came to work with Johnny Depp on Pirates of the Caribbean is a case in point.

“It took me two years before I realised who he was,” Richards says, lighting another fag. “He was just one of my son Marlon’s mates, hanging around the house playing guitar. I never ask Marlon’s mates who they are, because you know, ‘I’m a dope dealer,’ ha ha ha. Then one day he was at dinner” — Richards mimes Johnny Depp holding a knife and fork — “and I’m like, ‘Whoa! Scissorhands!’ Then I find out he’s an actor, and like one of the biggest Keith Richards fans in the world — and how do I deal with that? ‘Get over it, Johnny.’”

Depp and Richards are currently shooting Pirates of the Caribbean 4, in which Richards plays, for the second time, Captain Jack Sparrow’s father — “It takes two hours to put the wig and make-up on. Back into the hairy prison. ‘Ooooh, sorry about my sword, babe,’ ha ha ha.”

Filming a bar-room scene, Richards has roped in “a couple of mates. Well, it’s a bar-room, innit?”

In between the previous film and this, Depp has been shooting a documentary on Richards, “kinda behind the scenes stuff. Johnny does interviews. Dunno when it’s going to be finished.” He shrugs again. The idea of being followed around by a documentary crew and one of the most famous actors in the world seems resolutely normal.

Possibly because of his upbringing — “I’m just a retarded gangster, really. Maybe that’s what I should have called the book. Retarded Gangster” — Richards seems genuinely at ease with his fame. He lives now, as he always has since a child, in a world outside most others’. He doesn’t watch TV (“Lovejoy,” he says finally, having struggled to think for some minutes about his favourite show), exists on old-fashioned comfort food (the book includes his recipe for bangers and mash: “Put the f***ers in the pan and let them rock”), has never voted (“I suppose democracy is the best there is to offer. But for a lot of people, it’s like telling the slaves they’re free. ‘Hey, man — where’s the next meal coming from?’”) and as for when he last travelled by public transport, he wrinkles his forehead and asks, mistily, “Have they still got trams?”

This leaves him at ease in the company of other infamous people (“My favourite head of state? Václav Havel. Very impressed with the man. He had a telescope in his office, trained on his old prison cell. He used to refer to it as ‘my old house’. I liked Clinton. He’s a lousy sax player. A little indiscreet, but as a guy — I’d take him on any time. He’s great.”

As for Tony Blair: “I wrote him a letter [about the Iraq war], telling him he had to stick to his guns. I got a letter back, saying, ‘Thanks for the support.’” He views the recent imprisonment of George Michael with equanimity and not a little amusement.

“Fame has killed more very talented guys than drugs,” he says, sighing. “Jimi Hendrix didn’t die of an overdose — he died of fame. Brian \[Jones\], too. I lost a lot of friends to fame. There’s that bit in the book where I talk about how I cope with fame and say: ‘Mick chose flattery, and I chose junk.’ Because I kept my feet on the ground — even when they were in the gutter. You know what? I bet George Michael is loving it. I say, ‘Stay in jail, George.’ There’s probably some dope and some gays. He probably won’t want to leave — it’s the best place for him. He’s playing around with fame. I can’t remember a song of his. I don’t want to knock the guy, but I’m an immortal legend, according to some,” he shrugs.

The implication is that, however wasted Richards got, he wouldn’t have crashed into a branch of Snappy Snaps on something as lightweight as a joint.

Richards is a man without regret. When I ask him if — given the chance to do it all over again — he’d start taking heroin, he doesn’t pause. “Oh yes. Yes. There was a lot of experience in there — you meet a lot of weird people, different takes on life that you’re not going to find if you don’t go there. I loved a good high. And if you stay up, you get the songs that everyone else misses because they’re asleep. There’s songs zooming around everywhere. There’s songs zooming through here right now, in the air.”

He looks up, as if he can see them, hovering over the grand piano.

“You’ve just got to put your hand out and catch them.”

During our whole chat, the only time he seems roused to genuine annoyance is when I ask him what I think might be the most amazing question of my entire journalistic career. Thanks to a meeting at a party last year, I am able to say to Keith Richards — one our greatest living rock stars — “Keith. I met Noddy Holder last year, and he’s convinced you wear a wig.”

“Not yet!” he says, looking genuinely indignant. “Hey man, what’s his problem with wigs?”

“He thinks both you and Mick wear them,” I say with mock disapproval.

“Get out of here!” Richards roars. He pulls down his bandanna and shows me his hair — grey, a little wispy, but looking undeniably real. “Hey, Noddy, you know, there are more important things in life than hair. Mick definitely doesn’t wear a wig. I know! I’ve pulled it! What’s Noddy’s problem?”

“I think Noddy’s just very proud he’s still got a gigantic afro,” I offer.

“Well, that’s about all he’s got,” Richards says sniffily. “Well done, Nod.”

Our hour is up. Richards is off to get ready for another day of shooting on Pirates — possibly the most high-profile busman’s holiday in showbusiness.

“Any plans for the future?” I ask, as he picks up his cigarettes — still eschewing the British ones on the table.

“Well, you know, we’ll be on the road again in the future,” he says, pocketing his lighter. “Yeah. On the road. I think it’s going to happen. I’ve had a chat with ... Her Majesty. Brenda.”
And he leaves the room, laughing.

He’s at it again. Winding up Mick; doing what he wants; being Keith Richards, for the sixty-seventh year in a row.
“I had to invent the job, you know,” he said earlier. “There wasn’t a sign in the shop window, saying: ‘Wanted: Keith Richards’.”

And he’s done a bloody good job of it.

www.thetimesonline.co.uk
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 15th, 2010 at 5:39pm by Gazza »  

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
SoulPlunderer
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 215
Northern Ireland
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #182 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 6:27pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Thanks Gazza! I actually liked this article but they pick out like six negative quotes about Mick from a 500+ page book but fail to mention any positives. I thought that was fair enough in this context as Moran was using the quotes to question Keith but the tabloids have unfortunately caught onto these quotes and every hack journalist from the Daily Mail to the Belfast Telegraph to Yahoo and Billboards websites are doing a copy and paste job to make it look as if Keith is only putting the boot in. Typical tabliod stuff but some people seem to get sucked in by it!
Back to top
 

"We're exiled, baby, and this is how it goes."&&&&-Keith Richards
 
IP Logged
 
gotdablouse
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,002
Paris, France
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #183 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 6:47pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
All very nice but it's rather self-serving as someone pointed out, I'd be interested to have his take on WTF he hasn't written a song of interest since...well 1996/1997 for B2B to be kind.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #184 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 7:25pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
gotdablouse wrote on Oct 15th, 2010 at 6:47pm:
All very nice but it's rather self-serving as someone pointed out, I'd be interested to have his take on WTF he hasn't written a song of interest since...well 1996/1997 for B2B to be kind.



The Times/Sunday Times will be serialising the book over the next few days. Its a subscription only service, but as I happen to be a subscriber I'll copy and paste each one on here.
Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
PartyDoll MEG
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Just one drink from your
lovin' cup

Posts: 3,127
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #185 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 7:56pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Thanks for posting the whole article, Gazza!  Very entertaining read!  Look forward to this book.  Somehow I don't think the prose will be as pointed as the utterances from Keith's mouth during an interview! Grin Grin
Back to top
 

.........
 
IP Logged
 
angee
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Sots

Posts: 81
USA
Gender: female
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #186 - Oct 15th, 2010 at 10:00pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Well, if you're going to post the serialization, the excerpts, I may have to read them.
Thanks, Gazza!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Steel Wheels
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Much love and support
to my dear friend Mary!

Posts: 2,686
2,000 Light Years From Home
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #187 - Oct 16th, 2010 at 5:29am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
This is a good time to be a fan. Life is going to be a fun read and we'll have plenty to discuss over the next few weeks and months as we all get into it.

I did some surfing around on other Stones boards and the way I understand it, the October 29th event in NYC will NOT be a traditional book signing where you go up and hand the author your book, which is what I was hoping for.
Back to top
 

I LIVE FOR THE ROLLING STONES!
Registered: Aug 2003, Posts on the old board: 1120
Devoted Stones fan since time began. SMILE. THE ROLLING STONES ARE HERE.

...
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #188 - Oct 16th, 2010 at 8:54am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
angee wrote on Oct 15th, 2010 at 10:00pm:
Well, if you're going to post the serialization, the excerpts, I may have to read them.
Thanks, Gazza!



Thats actually a fair point, Angee. I realise some people prefer to wait to get the whole thing in book form so from now on the serialised excerpts (and any feedback from them) will go in a separate thread.

First extract is up now :  http://rocksoff.org/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1287236063/0

and everything else regarding 'Life' (media reports, interviews, book signings or lack of, etc) can stay in this one.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 16th, 2010 at 9:09am by Gazza »  

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
sweetcharmedlife
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Do the horrendous to that
if you can

Posts: 11,943
San Mateo
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #189 - Oct 16th, 2010 at 10:20am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 16th, 2010 at 5:29am:
This is a good time to be a fan. Life is going to be a fun read and we'll have plenty to discuss over the next few weeks and months as we all get into it.

I did some surfing around on other Stones boards and the way I understand it, the October 29th event in NYC will NOT be a traditional book signing where you go up and hand the author your book, which is what I was hoping for.

Yeah but you still get a signed copy. Probably easier for Keith to do it that way.
Back to top
 

I'll shoot it to you straight and look you in the eye
So gimme just a minute and I'll tell you why
 
IP Logged
 
Steel Wheels
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Much love and support
to my dear friend Mary!

Posts: 2,686
2,000 Light Years From Home
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #190 - Oct 16th, 2010 at 3:44pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
And it's more secure which I totally understand. I just hope I score tickets to this thing and that the book you get with the ticket is autographed. But I had this foolish idea I'd meet him.
Back to top
 

I LIVE FOR THE ROLLING STONES!
Registered: Aug 2003, Posts on the old board: 1120
Devoted Stones fan since time began. SMILE. THE ROLLING STONES ARE HERE.

...
 
IP Logged
 
gotdablouse
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,002
Paris, France
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #191 - Oct 16th, 2010 at 10:29pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
For those who don't have access to RS or who are saving up for the next Stones CD, it's available here for perusal.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
left shoe shuffle
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 4,141
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #192 - Oct 17th, 2010 at 8:32am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 

Life and times of a Rolling Stone: Keith Richards' autobiography


Drugs, women and song - as the rocker's autobiography is published, Neil McCormick remembers wild nights with Keith Richards.


By Neil McCormick
Published: 16 Oct 2010

...
Rolling Stones member Keith Richards performs on stage at Twickenham Stadium
Photo: GETTY IMAGES



“My life’s been dedicated to avoiding trouble,” Keith Richards once told me, “so it’s pretty funny how much I’ve run into.”

When he laughs, you can hear the years rattling around his chest and throat. Five decades on the edge have made him the living personification of all the most extravagant myths of sex, drugs and rock n roll. He is the Human Riff, the world’s most elegantly wasted human being, rock’s ultimate survivor. Or so the story goes, endlessly recycled in rock magazines and unofficial biographies. “As far as I’m concerned, it’s all Grimms fairy tales,” according to the man himself.

Now Keith is telling his own story, in his autobiography, Life (published by Little, Brown & Co on October 26th). It was written with James Fox, author of White Mischief, who has known Richards since the early 70s. According to Rolling Stone managing editor Will Dana, “Keith holds nothing back. It’s funny, gossipy, profane and moving... Outside of Bob Dylan’s Chronicles, it’s probably the best rock memoir ever written.”

After a lifetime of legendary debauchery, you might not think Keith could remember much. The truth is he remembers everything, just not always in the right order. I have met him a few times over the years, most memorably when he practically kidnapped me for two days in LA in the early 90s, driving me around in his limo and keeping me talking till sunrise. But the first time I interviewed him, as a young journalist in the 80s, I feared it was a disaster. He was at the wrong end of a bottle of Jack Daniels and was all but incoherent, talking in long, florid quotes that made little sense. But when I got home and listened to the tape, I started to piece it together, jigsaw fashion. I realised I had got a great interview, all jumbled up.

Keith glares at the world from publicity stills with the fearlessness of someone who really has “been there and done it”. In person, he’s smaller, looser, paunchier, softer than you might expect. His face is a mass of lines and wrinkles. At times, listening to him talk is like watching a drunk stagger down a corridor: his voice lilts and tilts, his sentences change direction. You’re never quite sure if he’s going to make it to the end, without collapsing. Somehow, he does.

The second night in LA, we wound up in his hotel room talking. He’d been up since noon the previous day, and was still going strong at 6am, slumped in an armchair, drinking vodka and fizzy orange, a vile concoction that tastes more of pop than alcohol but has been Keith’s favourite tipple for two decades. Keith made numerous visits to the bathroom, from which he would return curiously refreshed. Whatever he was taking, he wasn’t offering it around, so I sagged in my chair, determined to get the story.

And then, out of nowhere, he started telling me a long, funny tale about a house he accidentally burned down in LA in 1978, escaping naked with a woman, not his (then) partner, Anita Pallenberg. It is an outrageous story that hadn’t appeared in print before. When I later researched it, it seemed to be substantially true. I was even taken to the spot in Laurel Canyon where the house had stood. Keith recalled, “everything had burned down, except for one wooden stump of a pillar, and in the bedroom this little portion of a chest of drawers, which had my passport, all my favourite tapes, jewellery, a shooter with five hundred rounds of ammunition. All untouched. And a friend of mine went back the next day when everything else was still too hot to touch, smouldering, and came back with my stuff. So what am I supposed to gather from my life? That I’m blessed? Should I count on it?”

The funniest incident from that night was watching Keith struggle with a phone, before instructing his ever present assistant to get hold of his wife, Patti Hansen, uttering the immortal line, “You know I’m no good with phones.”

I’m not sure Keith was good with anything, except music. But that is enough. “The rock’n’roll is important,” he insists. “The sex and drugs is just something that happened to me along the way.” Keith lights up when he talks about music, becoming enthused to the point of reverence. Whatever people think about his lifestyle, it is his sense of complete immersion in the grooves and the chords that really defines him.

In 1989, he was hailed as a “living legend” at an awards ceremony. “That’s all right,” Richards responded “but immortal is even better.” At times he really has seemed unstoppable. With his lifestyle, few would have bet on him making it to 67. Anita Pallenberg once said she thought he would die onstage. “If I had my way, I probably would,” he told me. “I can think of worse places to croak.”

He has defended his prodigious drug intake as a response to the intensity of life on the road, liking it to World War II bomber pilots who had to keep going at all costs. In the past decade, Keith has insisted he is drug free. Not because of moral or heath issues, mind you, but because “the quality’s gone down.” It is, at least, an answer that maintains his defiance. If there is anything more obnoxious than a hardened drug user, it is a former drug user telling people why they shouldn’t use drugs. “I’ve given up everything now,” he claimed in a recent interview, although he was drinking vodka and chain smoking Marlboros at the time.

He’s on the promotional trail for his book right now, conducting himself in interviews with his usual piratical swagger. “You only get the truth from me,” he likes to boast. Well, up to a point. His is a truth filtered through a lifetime of anecdotal repetition and distorted by constant self-justification, a truth made up of soundbites.

But there was an off guard moment during our long nights in LA, after a video and a photo shoot focussed on his skull rings and snakes head cane, when the hullabaloo had died down, and he whispered something totally unexpected. “I get real sick of the skulls and shit,” he said, with a resigned sigh. “The image thing is a ball and chain. There’s nobody like Keith Richards that would ever be alive. No way. But you can’t buck the image. As long as I don’t have to be that guy all the time, or with my friends. I guess the Keith Richards hard man is something that gives me the room to be who I really am. He’s my perimeter defences.”

My most abiding personal memory of Keith is driving through LA after midnight, in a limo, gliding down a deserted freeway. There was champagne on ice, a bottle of 100 per cent proof vodka, a bunch of bananas in a fruit bowl and a woman who seemed to have neglected to put on her underwear. Keith’s assistant found an oldies station doing a Motown weekend on the radio, and Keith was in rapture. He smoked cigarettes, drank Evian mineral water, and rhapsodised about every song that came on. When we reached the hotel after an hour’s drive, he didn’t want to stop. “Just keep driving,” Keith demanded. “Let’s keep driving all night.”

The Telegraph
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 17th, 2010 at 8:41am by left shoe shuffle »  

...
 
IP Logged
 
Steel Wheels
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Much love and support
to my dear friend Mary!

Posts: 2,686
2,000 Light Years From Home
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #193 - Oct 17th, 2010 at 8:59am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
"Let's keep driving all night."

Right on, Keith. Right on.

Back to top
 

I LIVE FOR THE ROLLING STONES!
Registered: Aug 2003, Posts on the old board: 1120
Devoted Stones fan since time began. SMILE. THE ROLLING STONES ARE HERE.

...
 
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #194 - Oct 17th, 2010 at 10:55am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
BBC1 will be broadcasting a (pre-recorded) interview with Keith by Andrew Marr next Sunday (24/10/10)

The show runs from 9-10 am, although for those of you who (like me) can't be arsed getting up early on a Sunday morning, it'll be on the BBC i-player (UK only) for a week afterwards.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00vm47r
Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #195 - Oct 17th, 2010 at 11:15am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Life turns full circle for the Butterfly broken on a wheel


William Rees-Mogg Last updated October 16 2010 12:01AM


Journalists who write leading articles have to reconcile themselves to the transience of their writings. This applies even to the great authors of English literature. When did one last see one of Samuel Johnson’s essays from The Rambler or The Idler quoted in the English press? If the doctor’s wisdom is forgotten, those of us who are day labourers in the same vineyard cannot complain of neglect.

However, it does occasionally happen that a particular article will enter the public’s long-term memory and be quoted a generation or more after it was first published. I have written one such article which is still remembered and quoted 43 years after it was first written. That was the leader I wrote for The Times of July 1, 1967, “Who Breaks a Butterfly on a Wheel”.

It owed little to my own writing and everything to the global celebrity of Mick Jagger and the poetic brilliance of Alexander Pope. Jagger and Pope were the pair of seahorses harnessed to the cockleshell of my leading article. The article was concerned with the imprisonment of Jagger on a minor drugs charge.

I was at that point still a young editor; I had been appointed only the previous January. The Rolling Stones were still emerging into their peak period of celebrity. I was interested in them as a social phenomenon, but I was not a fan of their music.

My own taste in popular music remained that of the 1920s and 1930s, the music of Jerome Kern and his generation. It is a long step from Showboat to Satisfaction, I was not yet 40, but I was already on the far side of the musical generation gap. As a young editor I naturally wanted to reach a younger audience; The Times opened its columns to a broader range of stories with greater youthful interest. We asked what Jagger had done to be sentenced to imprisonment for three months by Judge Block.

In the leading article I summarised the charge against him: “We have, therefore, a conviction against Mr Jagger purely on the grounds that he possessed four Italian pep pills, quite legally bought but not legally imported without a prescription.” The tablets were sold in Italy for seasickness. In chemical terms they consisted of amphetamine sulphate and methyl amphetamine hydrochloride.

In the leader I took the view that everyone should be equal before the law. I asked the question: “Has Mr Jagger received the same treatment that he would have received if he had not been a famous figure, with all the criticism and resentment his celebrity has aroused?”

In the Daily Mail, Monica Furlong had used the word “decadence”, and it was clear that Judge Block wanted to make an example of the Rolling Stones, going beyond the normal sentencing practice.

This leader had considerable impact. The Times was not expected to side with the liberty of pop stars against the fulminations of the judiciary.

I pointed out that the normal penalty for a technical offence of this sort would be probation. In fact, the appeal court eventually substituted a minor non-custodial sentence. I wrote the heading on the leader, “Who Breaks a Butterfly upon a Wheel”, and left the office, then still in Printing House Square, satisfied that I had made a good case. A sub-editor found that my heading was too long by two letters and altered “upon” to “on”, thereby throwing Pope’s line out of its true iambic rhythm.

The line is from what is probably the greatest of Pope’s satires, his ruthless attack on the minor Georgian politician Lord Hervey.

The Times then received a very large correspondence, balanced between those readers who were shocked that we should have criticised the original judgment and those who thought that The Times had moved into the age of contemporary reality. Years later, our youngest daughter met Jagger, who said that he was grateful to me because I had saved his career. I was also flattered to read that Keith Richards felt that “we got saved by Rees-Mogg”.

The next event was a television confrontation arranged between Jagger and the Establishment. This was held in the garden of the Lord Lieutenant of Essex. I took the chair; the Establishment was represented by an Anglican bishop, a Jesuit and Sir Frank Soskice, who had been a Labour Attorney-General. Jagger arrived by helicopter. I think that this confrontation, which made good television — it is still sometimes shown — was the idea of John Birt, who was to become Director-General of the BBC. At any rate, he was present as a young researcher.

It was, of course, Jagger who was the star; he was also the winner in the debate. He handled his case extremely well. The Jesuit, Father Corbishley, recognised that he was dealing with a highly intelligent young man, worthy of serious debate. The bishop tried to patronise Jagger, which was a mistake.

At that time the Beatles and the Rolling Stones were in intense rivalry. Each group had its own image, which spread over into political attitudes. The Beatles, coming from Liverpool, were seen as more socialist; the Rolling Stones were more aggressive and radical. In fact, Jagger turned out to be an early libertarian, basing his arguments on those which had been used by John Stuart Mill in his book On Liberty. He argued that everyone has a right to take risks with their own lives, provided that they did not damage other people. On that view, the State has no right to interfere in individual lives unless there is damage to others.

One always looks back with some surprise at what one has failed to see at a past time. It is now easy to see that the Beatles were the popular musical establishment of a left-of-centre period. They were in no way a threat to Harold Wilson, who approved their nominations for their MBEs.

The Rolling Stones’ appeal was more radical; it was the radicalism that foreshadowed the new individualism. Jagger turned out to be closer to the way that the world developed in the 1980s. He could easily have said that there is no such thing as society. He was not necessarily a man of his time, but of a time that was still to come. His appeal was disturbing, anarchic and dangerous.

The Beatles chose to be the good boys; the Stones were the bad boys, always a potential threat to the Establishment. They were the leaders of an individualist and generational revolt against the old order.

William Rees-Mogg is a columnist for The Times and was its Editor from 1967-1981



http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article2769754.ece

Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
Gazza
Unholy Trinity Admin
*****
Offline


Rat Bastid      "We piss
anywhere, man.."

Posts: 13,231
Belfast, UK
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #196 - Oct 17th, 2010 at 11:22am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 

Stones were saved by article in The Times, says Keith Richards


Damian Whitworth Last updated October 16 2010 12:01AM

The Rolling Stones would have been destroyed at the height of their notoriety more than 40 years ago if The Times had not launched its famous attack on their jail sentences for drugs offences, Keith Richards reveals today.

The guitarist with the world’s biggest and most durable rock band is convinced that the thundering intervention of William Rees-Mogg saved him and Mick Jagger from career-ending prison terms.

Lord Rees-Mogg, who was the editor at the time of the 1967 case, wrote a leading article headlined “Who breaks a butterfly on a wheel?” that savaged the sentences handed down to the young stars. Shortly afterwards Richards’s sentence was quashed and Jagger was given a conditional discharge.

In his autobiography, Life, serialised exclusively in The Times magazine today, Richards writes: “We got saved by Rees-Mogg, because, believe me, I felt like a butterfly at the time and I’m going to be broken.”

Richards believes that the Stones were targeted by an Establishment unnerved by the emergence of rock bands and the new availability of recreational drugs.

The trial arose from a raid on a party Richards threw at Redlands, his home in West Sussex, in February 1967. Jagger and Marianne Faithfull, his girlfriend at the time, were among the guests and a large quantity of drugs was consumed. Richards writes that he had been taking LSD and was so confused when he answered the door that he thought the police were a group of identically dressed dwarves.

At the trial Richards was sentenced to a year in prison for allowing his house to be used for smoking cannabis resin and Jagger was jailed for three months for possession of four amphetamine tablets.

Richards believes that the judge was unimpressed by his responses to the prosecutor, who asked him if it was “normal” for a woman (Faithfull) to be wearing nothing but a fur rug in the presence of several men. Richards replied: “We are not old men. We are not worried about petty morals.”

He writes: “It got me a year in Wormwood Scrubs. I only did a day, as it turned out, but that was what the judge thought of my speech — he gave me the heaviest sentence he thought he could get away with.”

He adds: “What a ludicrous sentence. How much do they hate you? I wonder who was whispering in the judge’s ear . . . The dark side of this was discovering that we’d become the focal point of a nervous Establishment. There’s two ways the authorities can deal with a perceived challenge. One is to absorb and the other is to nail. They had to leave the Beatles alone because they’d already given them medals. We got the nail.

“It was more serious than I thought. I was in jail because I’d obviously p***ed off the authorities. I’m a guitar player in a pop band and I’m being targeted by the British government and its vicious police force, all of which shows me how frightened they are.”

Of his brief sojourn in Wormwood Scrubs, he writes: “The whole place is meant to intimidate you to the max.” He and Jagger were released to await their appeal and The Times published its leader, which argued that there “must remain a suspicion in this case that Mr Jagger received a more severe sentence than would have been thought proper for any purely anonymous young man”.

The article acknowledged that there were some people who “resent the anarchic quality of the Rolling Stones’ performances, dislike their songs, dislike their influence on teenagers and broadly suspect them of decadence”. However, it added: “If we are going to make any case a symbol of the conflict between the sound traditional values of Britain and the new hedonism, then we must be sure that the traditional values include those of tolerance and equity.”

Lord Rees-Mogg said last night that “it was not a leader I expected to be famous as I was writing it. It is very flattering for newspaper power to be used in a way that a long time afterwards one can look back on and feel satisfied with.” He said he was aware that some people with influence “wanted to see them taken down a peg. I genuinely thought an injustice had been done”.

In today’s extracts Richards also details his complicated love rivalry with Jagger. When Jagger had a fling with Richards’ girlfriend, the actress Anita Pallenberg, Richards went off with Faithfull. On one occasion he was with her when Jagger returned and had to escape out of a window without his socks.

He writes that Jagger’s dalliance with Pallenberg “probably put a bigger gap between me and Mick than anything else, but mainly on Mick’s part, not mine. And probably for ever.”

Back to top
 

... ... ...
WWW https://www.facebook.com/gary.galbraith  
IP Logged
 
The Wick
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,065
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #197 - Oct 17th, 2010 at 6:37pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
To be honest, I found the extracts and the interviews a little predictable but I loved that William Rees Mogg piece. What a lovely look back on one of the greatest editorial pieces of all time.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Joey
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Online



Posts: 20,647
Omaha , NE
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #198 - Oct 17th, 2010 at 7:04pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 

"My most abiding personal memory of Keith is driving through LA after midnight, in a limo, gliding down a deserted freeway. There was champagne on ice, a bottle of 100 per cent proof vodka, a bunch of bananas in a fruit bowl and a woman who seemed to have neglected to put on her underwear.......... he didn’t want to stop. “Just keep driving,” Keith demanded. “Let’s keep driving all night.”

Joey like !!!!!!
Back to top
 

...&&&&D.J. Jazzy Joe and the Fresh Prince of Boca Raton !™&& *** " VICTORY !!!! " ***...
 
IP Logged
 
gotdablouse
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,002
Paris, France
Gender: male
Re: Keith Richards - Life
Reply #199 - Oct 17th, 2010 at 7:14pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Patti must have been happy to read about that girl...didn't Keith recently say he stuck by his old lady?...Talk is cheap, eh ?

So is this Keith's latest theory that Mick lost it because he slept with Anita? They still seemed pretty chummy until Keith decided he wanted to have his say again in the early 80s...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Gazza, Voodoo Chile in Wonderland)