Ian Billen wrote on Mar 17
th, 2010 at 10:38pm:
Gazza Wrote:
As far as I know, their 'new record contract' is for distribution rights to their back catalogue only. They're under no contractual obligation to record new music for Universal. if they do, I'd imagine it'll be on Universal as they're contracted to that label for five years, but they don't necessarily HAVE to make a new album for them.
_________________________
The contract covered the back catalog, and believe it or not upcoming studio albums as well. Nobody HAS to do anything in life your right. However not doing something can risk repercussions or cause inevitable consequences.
The record deal certainly covers upcoming studio releases by them so The Rolling Stones are under contract to record new studio albums with Universal. Exact details of the deal were not disclosed on exactly how many brand new studio albums, but
the deal did consist of more than one studio release Universal stated.
Ian [/quote]
Could you please show me a link to a story that stated that. I've certainly never seen one, and believe me I looked.
Why would someone say it was 'more than one studio release' and then 'not disclose' how many it was for. Every Stones album deal previously mentioned specifically how many new studio albums they were contracted to record, so why would this be a 'secret' all of a sudden? Its hardly something that needs to be kept quiet.
If they make a new studio album, I agree it'll be on Universal. I honestly havent seen anything that says they're contracted to deliver them, though. And as they're now two years into a five year deal without a sniff of a new album, the chances of them delivering 'more than one' within that timeframe is pretty remote.