Gazza wrote on Nov 26
th, 2009 at 7:19am:
[quote author=texile link=1259152235/0#16 date=1259201759]
The ironic and sad thing about the last comment is that most 'Stones fans' would hardly know Mick Taylor if he walked past them on the street. Thats a sign of not only how badly his own career post 1974 has been managed, but of the revisionism within the Stones organisation in recent years.
Can't argue with that, but that may be why i tend to be defensive about MT - he
is the least known Stone....and i think that 'revisionism' has alot to do with fans appreciating the musical distinction of that era.
Even the historically reviled (by critics and fans of the time) albums like GHS and IORR have a certain charm, elegance and
softness about them that is much more appreciated now.
And being a musician, i tend to underestimate the value of producers, but Miller was definately part of that era's greatness and i didn't mean to diminish that - i know they do more than turn knobs etc....
but MT is always the underdog in the Stones discussion simply because of his post-Stones status and maybe his own quiet persona...(I remember wondering how that blond guy was in the album jacket of Hot Rocks - he didn't 'fit' and i didn't even know who he was at the time.)
To me, giving him props with the Stones is like heralding an unheralded David to the Stones' Goliath epic.
And YCAGWYW live has never been the same since 1973.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adhj-LCQfMo