Bitch wrote on Nov 24
th, 2009 at 6:27pm:
Yeah we talked about Glastonbury a few months back and The Stones were rumored to be the headliners so I was going to try to go but it sold out before they announced any of the bands. And Gazza predicted the Stones would most likely NOT be on the bill so as usual Gazza is correct!
Bit early to assume that as the Stones havent confirmed they
won't be playing it and the bill isn't anywhere close to being confirmed.
I just think its unlikely for three reasons - late June seems pretty early for the Stones to be on tour anywhere, I'd be surprised if BOTH U2 and the Stones would want to be on a festival bill where they're merely co-headliners and would be seen as having at best merely equal 'status' to another act and, perhaps most significantly, whilst for me the Stones are a far better band, I think they'd be reluctant to play such a high profile gig in front of a big TV audience while they're not 'road tested' - and risk comparison with a well-rehearsed band who would have been on the road for about 14 months by that stage.
I DO think they'll play Glastonbury eventually however. Maybe 2011. I'd just be
very surprised if they take the risk of playing there next summer before their tour starts in earnest.
If they are announced, it'll still be possible to get tickets. Whilst the event goes on sale before any act is confirmed and sells out very quickly, there's always more tickets held over for sale around March or so, after the bill is confirmed. I think Bruce only confirmed his appearance there this year around March/April.
Glastonbury was the only one of the 5 gigs that Springsteen played in the UK and Ireland last year that I missed. Whilst it looked good on TV, I wouldn't have gone anywhere near it had I been offered a ticket for free. Much less hassle from the comfort of my armchair. Similarly, I'd have absolutely zero interest in seeing the Stones play there.