Honky Tonk Man wrote on Nov 19
th, 2009 at 11:50am:
texile wrote on Nov 18
th, 2009 at 6:24pm:
for me, the stones didn't really do R&B until Black and Blue -
the early Rhythm and Blues stuff was stiff and awkward, but the later, more funky stuff was the stones blueprint for white rock and roll guys with soul.
Have you seen the NME Poll Winners footage from ’64 and ’65? Absolutely nothing ‘stiff and awkward’ about their early RnB years at all! There may have been over more, how shall we say, serious blues-style acts working the London club circuit – John Mayall, Alexis Corner, Cyril Davis, etc – but the Stones were excellent at working and crowd and were surely one of the more convincing British acts of the day. Little Red Rooster is the blueprint recording of a blues staple by a 1960’s group – and lets not forget that it is the sole pure blues recording to reach the UK top spot.
Black and Blue? Funky?
Maybe its the term R&B...
to me,
Rhythm and Blues is the early stuff, like Mercy, Hitch Hike, Walking the Dog etc....
but when i think of R&B, i think of the more funky soulfull stuff starting with Black and Blue...when Mick seemed to be listening to the Ohio Players...things like that -
But itstill prefer the later stuff when the stones developed their own kind of soul...rather than copying