LadyJane wrote on Sep 2
nd, 2009 at 5:26am:
At this point just give me some solid news.
I'm sick and tired of all the speculation.
If it's over, I want to know.
That said:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LJ.
Agree 100%. No doubt there'll now be several weeks of torture with no firm official info from the Stones organisation.
Dont be expecting a confirmation or denial any time soon from rs.com - they'll be too busy preparing for their upcoming 'Celebrate Labor Day with the Stones' merchandise firesale. Those fuckers will only tell you about it if it's going to be on a t-shirt.
Still not a whisper about this on any other news source yet. Will have to do some fishing around later and see if there's any more to it.
Have to say I'd be surprised - especially as Charlie told a fan only last month they'd probably be touring next year. If he was quitting, he could have diplomatically just said 'I don't know yet' or something.
I wouldnt dismiss the Charley Drayton story so easily if Charlie did quit. He'd be the obvious choice in theory - not as a replacement member of course, but to fill in as Darryl Jones did when Bill left. And whilst Keith did say many times over the years there'd be no Stones without Charlie, he did go back on that about four years ago and suggest that as long as he and Mick were there, they could actually continue.
But the very thought of the Stones continuing with BOTH members of that rhythm section retiring? Count me out. If one of the current band members bows out now, it's time to acknowledge that its been a great innings and it's time to call it a career. It would simply be a bad joke otherwise. No Charlie, no Stones.
I still have serious doubts about this, though. Hope I'm right!