LadyJane wrote on Nov 4
th, 2009 at 10:33am:
Yes as opposed to hatred for Bush and/or infatuation with Obama.
LJ.
I've pointed it out many many times and will continue to do so...the people who put Obama into office DID "vote with their brains". We didn't have a choice in the matter. Or, rather, we only had one. Even Glenn Beck says that Obama was a better choice than McCain!
(CBS) In an interview for the inaugural installment of @katiecouric, the new Web show hosted by Katie Couric, Glenn Beck said that he thinks "John McCain would have been worse for the country than Barack Obama."
Beck, the Fox News personality, radio host and author, also said that he may have voted for Hillary Clinton over McCain had Clinton been the Democratic nominee in 2008.
"I can’t believe I’m saying this, I think I would have much preferred her as president and may have voted for her against John McCain," Beck told Couric.
Prompted to elaborate by the CBS Evening News anchor and managing editor, Beck said he thinks "McCain is this weird progressive like Theodore Roosevelt was."
"I think John McCain would have been worse," he continued, laughing. "How about this? I think John McCain would have been worse for the country than Barack Obama. How’s that?"
*********
That may very well be the ONLY thing on which I will EVER agree with Mr. Beck. But the whole "Obama's supporters think he is the messiah/anyone who doesn't hate him is a drone" mantra is entirely an invention of the other side.
Do you actually think everything would be hunky-dory right now if McCain and (shudder) Palin were in office?
As for that whole "vote out the incumbents" thing - it would work better if we had more than two parties.