|
Riffhard
|
Re: Obama elected President
Reply #7394 - Sep 16th, 2009 at 1:24pm
Pdog wrote on Sep 16 th, 2009 at 6:41am: Riffhard wrote on Sep 15 th, 2009 at 10:18pm: What I find so incredibly disgusting here is implication by you guys, and the liberal media, that the only reason that so many people have a problem with Obama is because of the color of his skin! That is an outrageous thing to say, however, it is an easy out and it completely and convieniently ignores the truth. It's always easy for an Upper West Side elite like Maureen Dowd, of the disgraced and nearly bankrupt NYTs to scream raicsm. I mean afterall, Joe Wilson is from the South. It all fits right into her Northeastern liberal mindset. Her slanderous article doesn't offer any kind of proof for her malicious claim. Just the implication of racism is enough for her, and her readers. She just plays the card that she was dealt by an angry Southern white senator. We all know what card that was. It's easy to make the claim, but there is not one scintilla of evidence to suggest that Wilson is a racist at all. He has no history of racism in his past. None. The implication alone will do for Dowd though. She knows that her readers will make the only obvious conclusion, and smuggly nod their heads in agreement at her spot on assesment of Wilson's redneck racist inner voice over their lattes. No proof mind you. Just a liberal hunch. I guess it would only be fair for me to ask of Maureen Dowd why did she so vehemently oppose Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court? I think it's because she hates successful black men that don't tow the liberal line. In fact I think that she considers them Uncle Toms. I have no proof that Dowd is a cross burning racist intent on "keeping the man down", but I think her objection of Thomas is proof enough. Don't you? Here, read an article from a newspaper that still has plenty of subscribers and makes money. This guy destroys the rupugnant Maureen Dowd. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100009567/maureen-dowds-disgust...It boggles my mind that liberals are being so dismissive of the tens of millions of Americans who are getting more politicallly invloved because of Obama's policies. People are rallying because of the blatant attempt by Obama and the Democrats in congress to remake our nation into one that our grandparents would never recognize. The spending is insane! We are robbing our children and grandchildren blind and none of you want to address that insanity. It's easy to just ridicule the voices of dissent when they are not coming from the liberal "group think" bubble. If you folks want to continue to believe the race of the president is the driving force of this political counter revolution than have at it. But you're being very delusional. If you think that all of these people are a bunch of racists than you are in for a very big surprise come the mid terms.  Riffy So does this mean you're not going to stop calling me unporovked names, or reply to my post about how you made huge claims that were false, especially since you just demanded I do so, in order to get an apology... Which btw , don't want or need and I'm asking rhetorically, b/c you're still going to be the racist, homophobic yelling jerk you've always been. The same troll who thinks they know it all, treats everyone who diagrees like a piece of dirt and pretends they get hurt feelings from one comment, while making hundreds of nasty direct and indirect put dwns using curses and insults. Your authoritarian style and your neo-con hateful ways are dying, maybe they will come back, maybe they will still have so fight, but you in particular, are seeing yourself, how people here don't want it... You're pretty much the only left, and the only one still being a dick. Where;s Maxy, Fiji, Glancar, Telecaster? All of the did the same mean hurtful I'm better than crap too. For the most part, all good guys too, but this political hate crap is why they aren't here, and it's the only thing you come back for... It's your main thing... go post Stones on a political board... Do I look bad when you call me names? No! you do, you look bad! In reall life too. You do need to know, you're a way nicer guy than Tele or Glancar, and Maxy is one of the funniest nicest guys I met online.... think about what I have written the past few days, hopefully you hear it and don't react with your vile crap one more time. You want an olive branch? Fine. I extend my hand in friendship. I apologize for making you feel that I was no longer your friend, and acting dickish towards you. I have met you. I have had one very ass kicking weekend with you, and other ROers (including Feej, I might add). So in that respect I am sorry that a political thread has driven such a huge wedge between us, and between all Stones fans on this site. We would certainly get along great if we met up again. JC being the lone exception, mind you. However, in the last two pages of this thread you have called me a cheat, and in the above post you claim that I am a "racist homophobic jerk", would like to withdraw those assertions? Or would you like to just explain your rational behind making such mean spirited, and downright false claims? As I pointed out on the first post of this page. The claim of racism is an easy out. It immediately puts the accused on the defensive. In that respect liberals, like Maureen Dowd, love to throw it out there. It distracts from the argument, and it has people pointing at nonsense proof of said racism. Funman's assertion that Wilson tried to protect the former sate flag of South Carolina, for example. That's a crap argument that anyone from the South can attest to. Wilson's support of the "Confederate" flag had nothing whatsoever to do with race! It's a cultural thing that non-Southerners will never understand I guess. Gee, see how the accusation of racism distracts! You say I'm a racist. Yet there is no evidence that I am, and, btw, I am far, far, far from a racist! You make the claim that I am a homophobe, but again, there is zero evidence of that accusation. It too is totally false. You say I'm a jerk. Guilty as charged, but only sometimes. I would point out that I am but one person here being forced to defend myself against a whole slew of backslapping liberals that never even consider any kind of civil discourse. What I'm saying here is that the assholes are on both sides of this argument, and you only see me as an asshole because we are on opposite sides of the debate. Take a look at some of 2000monkey's posts. How about Jizzy's? Can't forget leonid's either. Perhaps BJ's blatantly smug elitest posts are another example of jerk-like behaviour? Don't even get me started abiout JC/Flea! Yet, to you, I am the jerk! The fact that you find common political ground with the others certainly wouldn't color your perspective, would it? This will probably get right under funman's skin, but I'm going to post it anyway. Matthew 7: 1-5
Jesus said to his disciples: "Stop judging, that you may not be judged. For as you judge, so will you be judged, and the measure with which you measure will be measured out to you. Why do you notice the splinter in your brother's eye, but do not perceive the wooden beam in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, 'Let me remove that splinter from your eye,' while the wooden beam is in your eye? You hypocrite, remove the wooden beam from your eye first; then you will see clearly to remove the splinter from your brother's eye."We could all take something from that reading, don't you think? Riffy
|
Pages: 
Obama elected President (Read 622,532 times)
