Riffhard wrote on Sep 9
th, 2009 at 8:16am:
Pdog wrote on Sep 9
th, 2009 at 6:26am:
Riffhard wrote on Sep 8
th, 2009 at 11:18pm:
texile wrote on Sep 8
th, 2009 at 10:36pm:
As opposed to the greedy health insurance agencies who refuse coverage for anything but a nail fungus?
Riffy, someone is already making life and death decisions on your health care - and they don't give a shit about you.
and the doctors screaming now are the same ones who will not touch a child with a brain tumor if that child has no insurance.
who's playing God here Riff?
At least this bill is predicated on the notion of improving your life, not playing with it.
Hence we need reform. We are just differing in the manner of that reform. You seemingly think that a power hungry federal goverment is less "greedy" than the free market. History has given us example upon example that that is simply not true. Far from it in fact. Reform? Yes. Government takeover? Never.
I trust "greedy" insurance companies that can be fired and replaced way more than I trust a government bureaucracy who's only incentive is saving money. I'll pay for the coverage I can afford for myself and my children. That way there is no way that the federal government can tell me, or anyone in my family that our particular treatment is not "cost effective". Long lines and rationing of service is the one thing that every single government run agency has in common. Keep it out of my life, and my doctor's office.
Riffy
Oops... I always forget, it's all about you...
WTF is that supposed to mean?!
Riffy
You wrote about yourself.. I, Me, mine!!! it's a Beatles song title... btw, JC laid the smackdown on you... and no, I'm not reading the article b/c you demand stuff and create hostility by calling people names...
do not read this:
You'd better sit down, folks.
Article 31 of the Iraqi Constitution, drafted by the Bush administration in 2005 and ratified by the Iraqi people, includes state-guaranteed (single payer) healthcare for life for every Iraqi citizen.
Article 31 reads:
"First: Every citizen has the right to health care. The State shall maintain public health and provide the means of prevention and treatment by building different types of hospitals and health institutions.
Second: Individuals and entities have the right to build hospitals, clinics, or
private health care centers under the supervision of the State, and this shall be regulated by law."
There are other health care guarantees, including special provisions for children, the elderly, and the handicapped elsewhere in the 43-page document.
Under force of arms, President Bush imposed his particular idea of democracy on a people not asking for it - perhaps a noble undertaking in one context and a criminal violation of international law in another. Bush's followers are proud of the Iraqi Constitution, a model for the world, they told us.
So, according to the American political right-wing, government-guaranteed health care is good for Iraqis, but not good for us. Not good for you. They decry even a limited public option for you, but gleefully imposed upon the Iraqis what they label here as "socialism," with much Democratic Party member support.
Indeed, reading the Iraqi Constitution so near to the 8th anniversary of September 11, 2001 is instructive. It is the very definition of American right-wing hypocrisy.
We have (thus far) sacrificed more blood to wrest Iraq from tyranny than we lost on 9/11.
In addition, according to the Congressional Research Service, as of May 15, 2009 (Report 7-5700/RL33110) we have spent and/or authorized $864 Billion in military operations on Operation Enduring Freedom, which includes Iraq and Afghanistan. The overwhelming majority of those funds have been for the war in Iraq. Additional secret funding has been authorized for intelligence and special operations.
The total is more than (or, in the worst case, equal to) the funding required to guarantee minimally decent health care here.
In other words, the most senior members of the Republican establishment - and some Democrats like Max Baucus (D-MT) - have gladly spent more taxpayer funds to ensure health care as a Constitutional right in Iraq than they are willing to spend to give you any level of guaranteed coverage.
The source document I used is from the official United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq. If you'd like to download and review the full Iraqi Constitution, click HERE
This news is an example of the benefit of our online viral information age. The situation was first called to my attention late yesterday (September 8) by a long-term blogger, Korkie Moore-Bruno, on a think tank list of Obama supporters. Korkie posted an alert from her Facebook friend Jubal Harshaw. Give them credit for the heads-up; all I've done was verify the rumor with the United Nations.
It would seem that U. S. citizens might find out if their Representative and/or Senators have supported or voted to fund the war in Iraq. If so, do they support health care as a civil right for you?
If the answers to those questions are "yes" and "no," respectively, you might consider less hypocritical representation.