You can play the victim all you want.

But your post was insulting and I resent it.

You don't like my politics, you don't like my opinions - you are entitled to your opinions.
You get on here and accuse me of paranoia because someone wrote an article that you disagree with -- how do you expect me to respond?

It would be like you posting an excerpt from Obama's memoirs and then my saying -- "oh my god, he's been in politics and all he can come up with is some vague reference to "hope" and "change" and that your prior heroin addiction (which you have talked about openly) must have made you stupid.

How would you feel?

Probably like it was a cheap shot.

nankerphelge wrote on Oct 27^th, 2008 at 3:53pm:


I never heard of heroin making a person less inteligent. So, I don't feel anything, in regards to your trying to make a case. It's your resentment, enjoy it. The article you cited did talk about scarey stuff, like death ect... I don't see how, that relates to your mtaphor, I still see how Fear was a huge part of the article you posted, and Paranoia and fear go together.
Why don't you work on your metaphor and my past drug use, i'm sure that will fix your resentment!
I really like the way you ignored the part about me keeping your confidence, when you directly asked me to do so, face to face. That really shows me how your feel about me, if a sarcastic comment builds a huge resentment, guess doing something, like keep my word to you, isn't worthy of your friendship, heh? Maybe I never had it to begin with!
I have a feeling, your slackjaw rebuttal and bringing up my past, are actual attempts to hurt me... That will definitely rid you of a resentment... You can be the bitter old Stones fans, clinging to your resentments and bongs!
you know what's funny... I'm picturing you right now, face to face with me, and you wouldn't have the balls, and you know it!

Wild Bill wrote on Oct 27^th, 2008 at 4:54pm:

What a total load of horseshit!  These morons couldn't even spell the word, "contraversy" [sic].  It is truly frightening to think that there are idiots out there who would swallow this story and who also have the right to vote. 

Jeez riffy - take a deep breath  - you sound like you're about to blow a gasket

LOL!!!  The pathos of the riffmeister and nankster whining like gimps is simply PRECIOUS!  You goin' DOWN you unAmerican fascist swine!  This is just sooooo rich.....

Whining?

Why - because despite Obama's attempt to surpress his past, and the media's cooperation in doing so, a tape emerges today that: (1) shows he is more socialist than even Riffy imagined (2) he looks at the U.S. Constitution (and those that authored it, and those who interpret it) as fundamentally flawed because it does not provide a Constitutional right to economic equality, and (3) that he really HONESTLY believes that it is the federal government's job to redistribute wealth as a matter of Constitutional law.

No jizzbreath - that ain't whining.
It is a little gigglin'

I have no illusions that this guy could be President - although there is still that inconvenient thing called an election still in the way.

But I think it is great that people that are undecided -- and who clearly have this election in their hands -- are finally seeing this guy for what he is.

I expect some people would vote for this guy even if he came right out and told people exactly what he is gonna do.  Hey - your choice. 

But I still think that there are plenty of non-Hahvid types who have functioning cerebral cortexes and whatnot to see through this snake-oil salesman.

    

What on Earth is there to envy?

Some of the most self-absorbed people on the planet.

Why spend all that money just to have people tell you that being an asshole is okay!?

I can tell you that for free!

stonedinaustralia wrote on Oct 27^th, 2008 at 8:17pm:


Absolute power corrupts absolutly. An Obama presidency, and both houses of a Democrat congress (with an aproval rating of 10%) hold the power. The power to push through legislation that would effect the very foundations of our democracy. The power to push a far more socialist "change" that they have openly discussed. The power to play big government Robin Hoods and redistribute wealth at a whim as Obama has openly discussed. The power to grant lifetime judicial appointments will most certainly rule with an eye towards bending, molding, and reinterpreting the US Constitution as they see fit. Any thought of a representative republic would be gone with this leadership. A Democrat super majority in congress would be filibuster proof, and then they will push through everything that they want at every American's cost.

That's not hyberbole either. It's a fact. Pelosi is far left by anyone's standards except her San Fran constituents and like minded liberals. Reid has proven to be the most devisive and partisan Senate leader in US history. Both have already talked about making huge "social" changes in the way this country works. I don't know what that means to you, but to me it sounds like my individual liberty is at great stake in a far reaching ever expanding big government.

I have given many reasons why Obama is unfit for command, but you refuse to acknowledge any of them. I point to his past associations and it's dismissed as guilt by association. I point the fact that those very associations would rule him inelligible for duty at any security branch inside the US government. That too falls on deaf ears. I point to his own quotes, and there many of them now, about his desire to "redistribute" and  "spread the wealth around", and the the man's own words are ignored as unimportant. I raise the concern about a tax plan that is fiscally impossible without raising everyone's taxes and that is deemed unworthy of investigation.

SIA you ask me to give you examples of what he has in store, and then you ignore every example that is presented. You needn't be a genius prognosticator to know what he has in mind. He has come right out and said it many many times now. The media ignore any coverage of it, and they willfully bury it. It's a no win for me to point out his flaws. You can lead a horse to water but you shouldn't have to beat it to make it drink. Those that happily ignore the known facts about this man will get exactly what their ignorance deserves. Unfortunatly so will the rest of us.



Riffy

"Absolute power corrupts absolutly"- well that is kind of my point too - once people get a hold of power they will happily compromise their "beliefs" to hold onto it - tho Obama's power will not be absolute - unless one of the things you expect him to do is fence off large tracts of Arizona in order to set up camps for his  political opponents and those that support them -  

- and if Obama, with the aid of a friendly Congress and Senate, can wreak havoc on US society as we know it then surely you would have faith in your fellow americans  to re-adjust the distribution of power - after all you do live in a democracy - as I said for all the far reaching socio/economic reforms Obama may have up his sleeve I don't think he will be able to come up with a way to avoid getting turfed out of Office or having the rug that is the Dem majority  in the Congress/senate pulled out from under him if the electorate isn't happy with what he is doing

the proof of the pudding will be,as they say, in the eating

corrupts. eh?  perhaps the unAmerican fascist swine would care to address the Ted Stevens factor



or not



OK now




Cazart!!!!!!

Riffhard wrote on Oct 27^th, 2008 at 10:21pm:


well if he's on the record as saying all these things  then you can hardly say he has a hidden agenda - looks like he's doing it in the road to me - maybe ,if the polls ae correct, the people aer prepared to see what it will bring

one point you should take on board re taxes and "socialism" is this - e.g. i am self employed and I pay taxes - part of those taxes are used to support peple by way of unemployment benefits who can't get a job - whether through lack of opportunity, sickness  or sheer laziness or some point in between

now i am happy for this to  happen - not because I get some warm fuzzy feeling that i am helping to support my fellow australians less fortunate than I am ( the "socialist" view)   - no not all - there's nothing altruistic about it at all - it is an insurance policy  of sorts - if the unemployed are given a few crumbs to keep them from starving then they won't be breaking into my house to steal my stuff so they can eat/score drugs or whatever - that is purely self interest at work  - 

riffy--better get y'er Depends back from O'Reilly...you and the nankster are dropping a trail of turds thickening with every post!





OK now




Cazart!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was flabbergasted to find out a prick like Stevens as a convicted felon can still serve in the Senate and run for office even while other convicted felons are denied the right to vote.Another example of why I detest politicians regardless of what "team" their on.