Wow ain't been around here much and nuthin changed. I think it's hilarious that y'all are still arguing over who JC is!!! Starbuck has been having a lot of fun yanking your chains with this. Take a look at JC's posts with lists of pictures with paragraphs in between. It's nearly identical to Starbucks posts with pictures and paragraphs in between.
I hope everyone here is well.
MM

Whoops! I guess I didn't read too closely. . .I didn't realize that the paranoia index had risen to IP address searching. I stand corrected. JC does a good Bucky impersonation though.
Carry on!
MM

monkey_man wrote on Jul 20^th, 2009 at 3:40pm:


i hope you're well too bud... 95% of the aliases here have been bucky and fiji... nothing has changed in that regards... except the acusations, hostility and paranoia have increased!!! haha!

"I didn't realize that the paranoia index had risen to IP address searching"

It isn't paranoia - although with some of the crazies around here, perhaps a healthy dose of paranoia is in order.

Just some information that was passed along to me.

and fleabit, if JC is you...FFS man...own up to it, and then go your merry way!

Starbuck wrote on Jul 20^th, 2009 at 4:04pm:


You call it recording?  Tomato, Tomato.

Riffhard wrote on Jul 20^th, 2009 at 4:25pm:


Obama has Tele'ed us.

Riffhard wrote on Jul 20^th, 2009 at 4:25pm:


riffmuff

i ain't saying it's bush's fault...but were you complaining when W was spending billions and billions to finance his war? were you raising red flags when we went from budget surpluses under clinton to budget deficits topping 700 billion?

see chart:

http://zfacts.com/p/519.html

that barry is dwarfing bush shows that both parties are filled with fucking idiots. have we no good leaders left in this great nation?

Riffhard wrote on Jul 20^th, 2009 at 4:43pm:


Bush didn't say it Barry did... I don't get it... then again, I think both were/are bullsit politicians... the only dif. between you and me on this is, you trusted at least one of them. and that's not a good thing!

nankerphelge wrote on Jul 20^th, 2009 at 4:00pm:


someone passed it along to you, wtf? does that mean... whether it's him or not, the only people here to pass that on are the mods, and if they told you that, just say it... but I've seen this lying accusation crap before... this is the heart of what divided RO... and the few who've done it, fall aquarely on the right. if you say something enough, even a lie, people will think it's true... whoever it is, had made you and Riffy look foolish and has stood up to all you're hostility and abuse with very good arguments on topic... So you're just pissed off... We've gone from watching you have an Obama meltdown to a Fleabit meltdown... My god, how the mighty have fallen!

LOL! Wrongo boyo! What has happened here is that a man who decided to trash everyone he once called friend has decided to be a pussy and come back under an alias and is not man enough to admit it. He got got!



Riffy

"were you raising red flags when we went from budget surpluses under clinton to budget deficits topping 700 billion?"

Sort of.

Yeah Clinton had a surplus - the so-called "peace dividend" - remember ol' Bill and Al Gore with their press conference to announce the peace dividend and they had charts and Al was all aglow.  Remember "peace" had broken out all across the world after the Cold War, so much so that the Clinton Administration cut the military budget significantly.

And I was one of many conservatives here and elsewhere that had big problems with Bush's inability to veto a bill.  To be fair, I think, following 9/11, you had to imagine that we would increase federal spending on national security issues. 

To be honest, I think the spending on the Iraq war was a thorny issue - there was little resistance to Congress' initial authorization for spending on the war because most everyone accepted the Administration's rationale for gooing to war.  Again, to be fair, I think that you had to expect a significant increase in spending for a military operation of some size given the reaction to 9/11. 

And the thing that makes me really wonder is how libs can point to Bush's deficit when Obama has eclipsed that in his first 6 mos.  I'm not saying two wrongs make a right.  I'm just wondering how it was such a big deal then, but not now?





 

Quote:


he looks like the indian in that daniel day lewis movie...