While Barry and Michelle are in the UK making assinine diplomatic blunders The Socialist One's minions in the House just passd a budget that spends more than every president prior to Barry Co. combinded! Are people so stupid as to not see that their futures are being sold out from under them?!?! So let me make sure I have this right. When Bush was spending like an idiotic drunken sailor on leave the liberals were screaming bloody murder about deficit spending, but now that the entire world is in a massive recession it makes perfect sense to destroy our kids' futures? Do I have that about right? Anyone care to defend this incredibly dangerous spending? Not that anyone can defend it, but anyone here want to try and give it a try?



Riffy

Riffhard wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2009 at 10:44am:

I've read that the iPod was loaded with Obalama's own speeches! Just how narcissistic is that asshole?

Nicely done, SV!

Quote:



Yeah, nicely done. The teleprompter is the big issue of the country.
A real President would read a transcript, never a teleprompter.

"I like to contrast what President Obama is up to and what John McCain,
his opponent in the general election, is up to. For example, Obama met
with 17 political leaders from 11 nations. He will attend five summits in
different countries around Europe.

Today, comparatively speaking, John McCain watched his 89 Caddy go through the car wash."

---David Letterman

fuman wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2009 at 7:52pm:

Tell that asshole Letterman that John McCain is a war hero & a true bi-partisan & Obalama is a Chicago pol whose only real job was "community organizer."

That's great BJ. I know that the world now likes us again thanks to The Socialist One, but what's he doing on the homefront? His proposed budget just passed in both the House and Senate on a party line vote. You guys own this budget now. Have fun defending it. When Barry Co. signs this budget into law he will have just created a one trillion dollar deficit every year for the next ten years. With one stroke of his socialist pen he will have put us an additional $10,000,000,000,000.00 in debt. Just to put that in to proper perspective, he will have just signed away (read-stolen) more of our money than all other US presidents combinded! He will also increase the size of the federal government more than any president in US history. What is it about progressive types (snicker...nothing progressive about a huge central government!) that feel that it is necessary for society to have a master? You can continue to worship this man, but I see him for what he really is. He's a hard left ideologue who has all intentions of determining exactly how we should live (and die for that matter! Just wait for the clusterfuck that will be national healthcare!), and how much we can make for our labor. Anyone that can't see through this guy isn't really looking very hard.


Riffy

___________________________________



Oh, and then there's this from the UK's Guardian...............



Barack Obama, the World's Greatest Orator (™all news organisations), didn't exactly cover himself in glory when the BBC's political editor Nick Robinson asked him a question about who was to blame for the financial crisis. Normally word perfect, Obama ummed, ahed and waffled for the best part of two and a half minutes. Here, John Crace decodes what he was really thinking ...

Nick Robinson: "A question for you both, if I may. The prime minister has repeatedly blamed the United States of America for causing this crisis. France and Germany both blame Britain and America for causing this crisis. Who is right? And isn't the debate about that at the heart of the debate about what to do now?" Brown immediately swivels to leave Obama in pole position. There is a four-second delay before Obama starts speaking [THANKS FOR NOTHING, GORDY BABY. REMIND ME TO HANG YOU OUT TO DRY ONE DAY.] Barack Obama: "I, I, would say that, er ... pause [I HAVEN'T A CLUE] ... if you look at ... pause [WHO IS THIS NICK ROBINSON JERK?] ... the, the sources of this crisis ... pause [JUST KEEP GOING, BUDDY] ... the United States certainly has some accounting to do with respect to . . . pause [I'M IN WAY TOO DEEP HERE] ... a regulatory system that was inadequate to the massive changes that have taken place in the global financial system ... pause, close eyes [THIS IS GOING TO GO DOWN LIKE A CROCK OF SHIT BACK HOME. HELP]. I think what is also true is that ... pause [I WANT NICK ROBINSON TO DISAPPEAR] ... here in Great Britain ... pause [SHIT, GORDY'S THE HOST, DON'T LAND HIM IN IT] ... here in continental Europe ... pause [DAMN IT, BLAME EVERYONE.] ... around the world. We were seeing the same mismatch between the regulatory regimes that were in place and er ... pause [I'VE LOST MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT AGAIN] ... the highly integrated, er, global capital markets that have emerged ... pause [I'M REALLY WINGING IT NOW]. So at this point, I'm less interested in ... pause [YOU] ... identifying blame than fixing the problem. I think we've taken some very aggressive steps in the United States to do so, not just responding to the immediate crisis, ensuring banks are adequately capitalised, er, dealing with the enormous, er ... pause [WHY DIDN'T I QUIT WHILE I WAS AHEAD?] ... drop-off in demand and contraction that has taken place. More importantly, for the long term, making sure that we've got a set of, er, er, regulations that are up to the task, er, and that includes, er, a number that will be discussed at this summit. I think there's a lot of convergence between all the parties involved about the need, for example, to focus not on the legal form that a particular financial product takes or the institution it emerges from, but rather what's the risk involved, what's the function of this product and how do we regulate that adequately, much more effective coordination, er, between countries so we can, er, anticipate the risks that are involved there. Dealing with the, er, problem of derivatives markets, making sure we have set up systems, er, that can reduce some of the risks there. So, I actually think ... pause [FANTASTIC. I'VE LOST EVERYONE, INCLUDING MYSELF] ... there's enormous consensus that has emerged in terms of what we need to do now and, er ... pause [I'M OUTTA HERE. TIME FOR THE USUAL CLOSING BOLLOCKS] ... I'm a great believer in looking forwards than looking backwards.

I've read that he did a lot of toot back then. A real charismatic type, eh?

Too bad you didn't do that for the previous President!

Three Pittsburgh policemen were killed in the line of duty today, because some fucknut believed that the sole purpose of Obama was to take his guns away.

I hope the brainwashing right wing fear installing talk radio machine is happy.  Keep it up Rush.

Well, well, well.

North Korea launched it's ICBM and we did nothing!
We didn't shoot it down - as Obama had warned.
That remarkable force of diplomacy Hillary did nothing -- she could have at least given them a red button that says "Fire at Will" in Korean!

Brilliant foreign policy on the part of Obama who, incidently, was speaking in Prague how he believed we could have a nuke-free world.    

What irony!

A rouge nuclear power with an ICMB fires one across our collective bow and our leader is talking disarmament.

Of all the nut case leaders that Obama should sit down and talk with, he decides to play chicken.



Nope, instead, Obama will run to the United Nations.
The UN will denounce the Korean launch in very VERY harsh words.
That'll teach them!
Maybe issue some sanctions against the North Koreans -- "No Soup For You!"

"No big thang Holmes, jus' chill man!"

fuman wrote on Apr 5^th, 2009 at 11:28am:


Absolutely Fuman.

But it might have been better to shoot it down. Who knows for sure? The US I believe has alot more nuclear firepower on the Korean Penninsula than that nut Jong. So he knows that any nuclear attack on  South Korea will result in his own obliteration.....the problem is that the guy is a whacko....so who knows.....isn't this what we pay our diplomats for? The Chinese, and possibly the Russians, are the only ones with any leverage over the guy.  

Ten Thousand Motels wrote on Apr 5^th, 2009 at 11:50am:



I would bet that we got ALL of the missile telemetry, and now have a solid understanding of their capability. We probably learned WHERE they are getting the technology for their missile program. And most importantly, how to defeat/manipulate the guidance system.

Just saying that it isn't always as straight forward as it seems.