Starbuck wrote on Nov 14
th, 2008 at 2:45pm:
sirmoonie wrote on Nov 14
th, 2008 at 2:30pm:
Starbuck wrote on Nov 14
th, 2008 at 2:20pm:
Brainbell Jangler wrote on Nov 14
th, 2008 at 2:04pm:
Starbuck's analysis is well-reasoned, fair and balanced. Sirmoonie's assertion that McCain was clearly the more qualified candidate is not. McCain's selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate vitiated any claim to good judgment that he might otherwise have made.
fair and balanced. that's me. i'm the #@$*ing fox news of rocks off.
i believe moonie was hinting at the fact that mccain was more qualified because he has more experience. nobody can deny that. obama is still wet behind his big, floppy ears in terms of his governmentalism, and mccain has been governing since rocks were invented. from that perspective, moon q. dizzle is correct.
however...palin thinks dinosaurs and people walked on the earth at the same time! tee hee! was that good judgement? hell nizzle.
She was chosen over the other creep because she's never put on a cloak and baptized dead guys by proxy. At least as far as I know she hasn't.
moonie...c'mon. palin? don't tell me you can defend the selection. she was a hail mary that sailed into the third row of bleachers behind the end zone.
she should be kept as far away from the oval office as possible. if she could baptise dead people in the name of her lord and savior jesus h. christ, you better believe she would.
She turned out to be a zero, so what? Again, its a VP pick. I completely understand why politicians have to pander to certain groups for votes, and the higher the office, the more they have to. That's a reflection of the public's stupidity, not the person running. I watched her the other day, she's not entirely stupid or psycho. She fired up Bush Geeks and some others that weren't, for whatever silly ass reason, going to vote McCain. Seriously, what else do you chose a vice president for? To be a vice president? Yeah.
I've never heard a decent explantion for Obama hanging around Rev. Wright for 20 years, and ditching him only when he became a liability. I don't even hold it against him that much, nor think it makes any real difference in how well he will do. But its far worse judgment in my mind than picking Palin for a cheerleading position.