LadyJane wrote on May 31
st, 2008 at 8:02am:
Ya know I can appreciate Bruce. I saw him in December and it was a good show. However, I was bored at times and I longed for The Stones. That's just me.
well,yeah because youre a Stones fan and not a Springsteen fan. So the connection isnt there. Perfectly natural. Personally speaking, Ive always liked the Stones and Bruce (plus Dylan too) all much the same, so I've a different perspective.
>See Shine A Light. Tell me THEN that the Rolling Stones aren't the GREATEST ROCK N ROLL BAND IN THE WORLD.
I'll tell you that without hesitation if youre talking about who is the better live act. SAL is not a great reflection of what a Stones show is. Its a decent enough performance which is well-filmed and which has some lovely moments. And the ABB tour was a definite step backwards quality wise from Licks, BTB and Voodoo Lounge. The ESB have always been a better live band as far as I'm concerned. Not just now. I've always maintained that in the 30 plus years I've followed them both and collected recordings by both. Doesnt detract from how fantastic a live band the Stones are or can be, though.
>I am sorry that the STones didn't kick your asses on the last Euro tour. Perhaps if they grace the States with another few shows you should consider crossing the Pond. You will never see a show like a Stones Show at Madison Square Garden.
I'll certainly never pay $450 for a nosebleed either! I've seen lots of Stones shows that were better than the ones I saw at MSG in both 2002 and 2006 (and those shows were very good indeed). The 02 shows last August for starters (the first 2 nights anyway) and several of the 2003 Licks shows (Wembley, Astoria, Glasgow, dublin) . New York is no more special as a crowd than anywhere else, and the last tour saw some great and some substandard performances in BOTH the US and in Europe..neither continent had a monopoly.... And a Stones crowd in this day and age bears increasingly less relation to a rock n roll audience than anything else I've seen, I'm sorry to say.
Ade wrote on May 31
st, 2008 at 9:49am:
the greatest frontman of all time, isn't up for debate, LadyJane.
My thoughts, are based on here and now, 2008.
whos providing the best value stadium concert experience.
Who's in tune with their fans?
who listens and connects with their fans? throws out the setlist, and plays requests?
Who keeps ticket prices down, at a price range that young, upcoming fans can afford, as well as fathers/mothers, who can afford to take their kids?
I saw a different demograph of concert goer last night, to the one thats present at Stones shows.
Less corporate,
less 'lets milk our fanbase dry'
less 'we're play the hits for the highest dollar.'
..and yet, wouldnt it be SO friggin' simple and honourable for the Stones to do likewise? (Ok..we maybe cant expect them to play for an hour longer than they do, but otherwise what youve stated above is so achievable..)
I still fuckin' love them despite everything and will do so until the day I drop, but you still feel that with a minor effort they could make things so much more fan friendly and better musically.