ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> Ian Stewart
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1449895140

Message started by mojoman on Dec 11th, 2015 at 10:39pm

Title: Ian Stewart
Post by mojoman on Dec 11th, 2015 at 10:39pm
thirty years gone hard to believe...........

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by Bitch on Dec 12th, 2015 at 8:56pm
yeah it is....

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by gypsymofo60 on Dec 15th, 2015 at 6:43pm

mojoman wrote on Dec 11th, 2015 at 10:39pm:
thirty years gone hard to believe...........

Stu was an absolute diamond and , the Stones were damned lucky to have hung onto him when he was treated so atrociously by all and sundry. And as for the paltry 30 second tribute on that awful bloody excuse for a record in 1986; Zeppelin gave him more kudos than his so called mates. Boogie on Stu, coz I know you is.

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by Bitch on Dec 15th, 2015 at 8:05pm
Stu got a raw deal, I agree.

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by gypsymofo60 on Dec 15th, 2015 at 9:43pm

Bitch wrote on Dec 15th, 2015 at 8:05pm:
Stu got a raw deal, I agree.

Raw deal? The blood's still dripping from their hands, and fuck me, Brian's been dust & Bones for years. Oh Ya Deary.. You know, Yonks.Did you know Stu rated 'Lovin' Cup', as the best song they ever recorded, or wrote; and he didn't even play on that. What a Geezer.

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by Bitch on Jan 4th, 2016 at 9:49pm
I thought Stu died from a heart attack, right? There was no blood on anyone's hands for that.

The raw deal I was referring to was getting shoved aside for not looking "rock star" enough, but I liked his looks just fine.

I didnt know he rated Loving Cup #1 and I don't disagree.

Brian's story is altogether different, so you cant compare them. Brian was a fvck-up and Stu had his act together.

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by sirmoonie on Jan 4th, 2016 at 10:19pm

Bitch wrote on Jan 4th, 2016 at 9:49pm:
The raw deal I was referring to was getting shoved aside for not looking "rock star" enough, but I liked his looks just fine.


He looked like the encephalactic child of John Kerry.  He was uglier than goddam Ronnie James Dio.  He could have won a head butt contest with Rocky Dennis.  He looked like the back side of the frying pan that hydro-planed Lance Ito.  My goodness.  Good grief.  Why that's amazing, Grace.

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by Edith Grove on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:39am

sirmoonie wrote on Jan 4th, 2016 at 10:19pm:
He looked like the encephalactic child of John Kerry.  He was uglier than goddam Ronnie James Dio.  He could have won a head butt contest with Rocky Dennis.  He looked like the back side of the frying pan that hydro-planed Lance Ito.  My goodness.



While the rest of them were just absolute beauty queens....



Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by Bitch on Jan 8th, 2016 at 6:27pm

Edith Grove wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:39am:

sirmoonie wrote on Jan 4th, 2016 at 10:19pm:
He looked like the encephalactic child of John Kerry.  He was uglier than goddam Ronnie James Dio.  He could have won a head butt contest with Rocky Dennis.  He looked like the back side of the frying pan that hydro-planed Lance Ito.  My goodness.



While the rest of them were just absolute beauty queens....




LOL yeah, but I would of banged Stu because his head was in the right place.  Lesson in anatomy, men, so listen up! The brain is the biggest aphrodisiac, so if you want to get a girl, start with her mind, it works every time. Less attractive men are far more appreciative too. I don't remember Stu with a girlfriend or a wife. His ego may have been permanently damaged after he was sidelined. 

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by Steel Wheels on Jan 8th, 2016 at 9:07pm
Stu has been nearly forgotten by the masses, even though he means a great deal to the band. Only die hard fans of the Stones know him, and those who like Boogie with Stu by Led Zeppelin.

But to suggest he got a raw deal...who knows. He was making money, touring the world, hanging with celebrities all the time, and hanging with the Rolling Stones. Compared to my fucking job, Stu was living the dream. He was living a fantastic life full of music and who knows what else.

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by Freya Gin on Jan 8th, 2016 at 10:39pm

Edith Grove wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:39am:
While the rest of them were just absolute beauty queens....


While I wouldn't call them that, I've always been mystified by the common perception that the Stones are/were ugly guys. I remember seeing a picture of them for the first time and immediately thinking, "Huh, that's odd, I heard they were ugly. I don't think so. They're actually not bad-looking at all." And I've seen some pictures since then that show they could be smokin' hot. But I'm sure I'll just be dismissed as a fangirl by most.


Steel Wheels wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 9:07pm:
He was living a fantastic life full of music and who knows what else.


I think they were called girls back then too, SW.

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by gypsymofo60 on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:50pm

sirmoonie wrote on Jan 4th, 2016 at 10:19pm:

Bitch wrote on Jan 4th, 2016 at 9:49pm:
The raw deal I was referring to was getting shoved aside for not looking "rock star" enough, but I liked his looks just fine.


He looked like the encephalactic child of John Kerry.  He was uglier than goddam Ronnie James Dio.  He could have won a head butt contest with Rocky Dennis.  He looked like the back side of the frying pan that hydro-planed Lance Ito.  My goodness.  Good grief.  Why that's amazing, Grace.

Jesus wept Moonie. No one is uglier than John Kerry, Skull & Bones confirmed. He looks like the grim Reaper with AIDS. Bohemian Grove's very own Nosterfaru, Piere luigi Collina, take your pick. Alex Jones says so, and I trust that dude.

Title: Re: Ian Stewart
Post by gypsymofo60 on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm

Bitch wrote on Jan 4th, 2016 at 9:49pm:
I thought Stu died from a heart attack, right? There was no blood on anyone's hands for that.

The raw deal I was referring to was getting shoved aside for not looking "rock star" enough, but I liked his looks just fine.

I didnt know he rated Loving Cup #1 and I don't disagree.

Brian's story is altogether different, so you cant compare them. Brian was a fvck-up and Stu had his act together.

Blood on hands was a metaphor.

ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.