The Recording Academy is finally getting some satisfaction, with Mick Jagger's first appearance on the Grammy stage.


(AP)The Rolling Stones frontman will perform at the Feb. 13 ceremony as part of a tribute to soul great Solomon Burke, who died last year. The Rock and Roll Hall of Famer opened for the Rolling Stones several times during his career comeback late in life.

Jagger will perform with soul singer Raphael Saadiq during the 53rd annual Grammy Awards, which will air live on CBS from the Staples Center in Los Angeles (8 p.m. EST).

"We're thrilled, delighted, excited and very much looking forward to Mick doing his debut on the Grammy stage," said Neil Portnow, president and CEO of the Recording Academy. "It's extraordinary to many of us that the fact is, this will be the first time; he has never performed on the Grammy stage."

This won't be Jagger's first appearance on a Grammy telecast. In 1986, the Rolling Stones were given a lifetime achievement award by Eric Clapton, and they performed on the show by satellite.

"We did a remote from London, and it was at least three o'clock there," said show producer Ken Ehrlich.

"I think they had been celebrating a little time before we went on camera," he said. "It was quite a moment."

Ehrlich has produced the show for 31 years and has always wanted Jagger and the Stones to perform, but it didn't work out until this year.

Ehrlich said it was Jagger's admiration for Burke that brought him to the Grammy stage.

"He's asked me not to go into detail about what he's doing, but I think when you see the performance, it will make a lot sense," said Ehrlich. "I think it was the idea of the performance that was intriguing to him and really brought him here."

Jagger will join a performers list that includes Rihanna, Cee Lo, Gwyneth Paltrow, Eminem, Arcade Fire, Katy Perry, Bruno Mars, Usher, Lady Gaga, Lady Antebellum and Justin Bieber.

Now I have a reason to watch the Grammys.

Phew! When I saw the thread title and realised Mixk was playing solo at the Grammys, I figured it might have been a special award to mark the 25th anniversary of 'She's The Boss'...

A Solomon Burke tribute? Pretty cool. Good on Mick for being part of it.

Cant help but think its another opportunity missed, though. Would it have been that difficult for the Stones as a band to have spent a few hours of their precious time rehearsing a cover of 'Everybody Needs Somebody to Love' or 'Cry to Me' ?

Gimme Shelter wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 6:15am:

EST). "We're thrilled, delighted, excited and very much looking forward to Mick doing his debut on the Grammy stage," said Neil Portnow, president and CEO of the Recording Academy. "It's extraordinary to many of us that the fact is, this will be the first time; he has never performed on the Grammy stage." This won't be Jagger's first appearance on a Grammy telecast. In 1986, the Rolling Stones were given a lifetime achievement award by Eric Clapton, and they performed on the show by satellite.

No they didn't. They were presented with the award in London by Clapton and the speeches were broadcast live via satellite but they didnt 'perform'.

Christ when you look at the other performers no wonder this guy is gushing about having Mick. I know they are "popular" but what a D list of no talent lip synchers. I'll pass on this and catch Mick via Youtube to save the eyes from the rest of the tools.

??

Arcade Fire are fucking brilliant and as good a live act as almost anybody else at the minute.

Gazza wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 7:07am:

?? Arcade Fire are fucking brilliant and as good a live act as almost anybody else at the minute.

Well then theres 2 Youtube videos I will watch for. Even the remote chance Bieber could appear on my TV screen is not worth risking..sorry

gimmekeef wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 8:01am:

Gazza wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 7:07am: ?? Arcade Fire are fucking brilliant and as good a live act as almost anybody else at the minute. Well then theres 2 Youtube videos I will watch for. Even the remote chance Bieber could appear on my TV screen is not worth risking..sorry

beiber fever is nothing to mess with.

Solomons best song imfo...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BcrbEexjYw

grammy is another word for old fucking woman!

Gazza wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 6:41am:

Phew! When I saw the thread title and realised Mixk was playing solo at the Grammys, I figured it might have been a special award to mark the 25th anniversary of 'She's The Boss'... A Solomon Burke tribute? Pretty cool. Good on Mick for being part of it. Cant help but think its another opportunity missed, though. Would it have been that difficult for the Stones as a band to have spent a few hours of their precious time rehearsing a cover of 'Everybody Needs Somebody to Love' or 'Cry to Me' ?

Yeah your right. Which again makes you wonder about the relationship betwenn Mick and Keith. Or wonder when the last time Keith picked up a guitar.

this makes me moist

I'll betcha Mick wears either blue or pink...

mojoman wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 9:35am:

this makes me moist

Hell yeah me too! Tickets for this event, with an invite are $3500 and up.  

Bitch wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 11:17am:

mojoman wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 9:35am: this makes me moist Hell yeah me too! Tickets for this event, with an invite are $3500 and up.

:smilemick

The advertisement for it on T.V. hasn't got Mick mentioned at all, or Arcade Fire,  but all those other D list lip synthetics are.

Finally something goooodaaa!!!!!!!!!!!! :thatwassmart

Mick's flexin his chops.   oh yeah

Rihanna is hot!

gimmekeef wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 8:01am:

Gazza wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 7:07am: ?? Arcade Fire are fucking brilliant and as good a live act as almost anybody else at the minute. Well then theres 2 Youtube videos I will watch for. Even the remote chance Bieber could appear on my TV screen is not worth risking..sorry

I blame Mick and Keith. I had never heard of Justin Bieber or Glee until they did that fucking skit on Jimmy Fallon which namechecked both of them!

Bitch wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 11:17am:

mojoman wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 9:35am: this makes me moist Hell yeah me too! Tickets for this event, with an invite are $3500 and up.

That cheap? I'm absolutely rigid at the thought of it!

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 9:04am:

Gazza wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 6:41am: Phew! When I saw the thread title and realised Mixk was playing solo at the Grammys, I figured it might have been a special award to mark the 25th anniversary of 'She's The Boss'... A Solomon Burke tribute? Pretty cool. Good on Mick for being part of it. Cant help but think its another opportunity missed, though. Would it have been that difficult for the Stones as a band to have spent a few hours of their precious time rehearsing a cover of 'Everybody Needs Somebody to Love' or 'Cry to Me' ? Yeah your right. Which again makes you wonder about the relationship betwenn Mick and Keith. Or wonder when the last time Keith picked up a guitar.

A Stones performance would have been a major media event and would have reminded the world that they're still a living, breathing entity - whereas no one outside of a few fan forums gives a fuck about a solo appearance at it by any of them.

Mick Jagger to Pay Tribute to Solomon Burke at the Grammys
Jagger will make his first-ever live appearance at the Awards
Mick Jagger performs on stage during the 25th Anniversary Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Concert at Madison Square Garden on October 30, 2009 in New York City.
Kevin Mazur/Mazur
Share92
By Matthew Perpetua
February 3, 2011 9:05 AM ET
http://assets.rollingstone.com/assets/images/story/mick-jagger-to-pay-tribute-to-solomon-burke-at-the-grammys-20110203/1000x306/main.jpg

Mick Jagger will make his first-ever live appearance at the Grammy Awards on February 13. The singer will be taking part in the ceremony's annual "In Memoriam" segment, and will pay tribute to the late gospel soul great Solomon Burke, who died last October. Jagger will be accompanied by Raphael Saadiq and his band.

Photos: The Rolling Stones Live, 1964-2007

Despite his long and widely celebrated career in music, Jagger has only once before appeared in a Grammy Awards telecast, in 1986, when he and the rest of the Rolling Stones were presented with the Recording Academy Lifetime Achievement Award via satellite from London.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/mick-jagger-to-pay-tribute-to-solomon-burke-at-the-grammys-20110203

here is 1986 appearance with clapton - very funny - they all seem to be taking the piss:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Swx9aCX-hY4

in a way it's a last hurrah for the Stones (and Mick) at their irreverant best - next stop the Hall of Fame and acceptance by and of polite society.

see charlie at 1.07 - looks very much in the throes of his heroin problem

"Mick Jagger to Pay Tribute to Solomon Burke at the Grammys
Jagger will make his first-ever live appearance at the Awards'

Do your best Jagger

stonedinaustralia wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 5:02pm:

here is 1986 appearance with clapton - very funny - they all seem to be taking the piss: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Swx9aCX-hY4 in a way it's a last hurrah for the Stones (and Mick) at their irreverant best - next stop the Hall of Fame and acceptance by and of polite society. see charlie at 1.07 - looks very much in the throes of his heroin problem

'Charlie - The Bela Lugosi Years'


He was absolutely off his tits (plus, in fairness it WAS something like 2 or 3 am when they filmed it, so some 'refreshments' had probably been taken!)  

When did you ever see another Stones media event where CHARLIE was the most animated band member?  ;D

Was that Charlie making that shrieking noise like a meerkat in labour when Clapton is doing his speech?

I hope they have Solomon's chair with his cape adorned over it.  There again, it is the Grammys.  Soy Bomb anyone?

Gazza wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 4:27pm:

Bitch wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 11:17am: mojoman wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 9:35am: this makes me moist Hell yeah me too! Tickets for this event, with an invite are $3500 and up.   That cheap? I'm absolutely rigid at the thought of it!

Will you guys get a room. :thatwassmart

:smoking   HA CHA CHA.....

gimmekeef wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 7:01am:

Christ when you look at the other performers no wonder this guy is gushing about having Mick. I know they are "popular" but what a D list of no talent lip synchers. I'll pass on this and catch Mick via Youtube to save the eyes from the rest of the tools.

No talent lip synchers..............Rhianna and Lady Gaga ??????????????

paul wrote on Feb 4^th, 2011 at 2:34am:

gimmekeef wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 7:01am: Christ when you look at the other performers no wonder this guy is gushing about having Mick. I know they are "popular" but what a D list of no talent lip synchers. I'll pass on this and catch Mick via Youtube to save the eyes from the rest of the tools. No talent lip synchers..............Rhianna and Lady Gaga ??????????????

yup....but if you like them that's great....just my opinion

Meanwhile...

http://roflrazzi.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/celebrity-pictures-west-swift-interrupted-miley.jpg

Nellcote wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 5:49pm:

I hope they have Solomon's chair with his cape adorned over it.

Good call.

Look forward to Mick's performance with Raphael Saadiq and his band.

stonedinaustralia wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2011 at 5:02pm:

here is 1986 appearance with clapton - very funny - they all seem to be taking the piss: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Swx9aCX-hY4 in a way it's a last hurrah for the Stones (and Mick) at their irreverant best - next stop the Hall of Fame and acceptance by and of polite society. see charlie at 1.07 - looks very much in the throes of his heroin problem

AMEN, BROTHER..THIS IS THE OFFICIAL END OF THE STONES AS WE KNEW THEM.
MICK IS A NANCE FOR DOING THE GRAMMY'S.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NPN4P3UyNk

This is a good one ~ Ronnie is blowing kisses and MICK and KEEF are LTAO having a blast with Burke's cloak!

I think Solomon Burke has 21 kids and 90 grandkids! Big family and a big man too!

Looking forward to MICK's performance, he will put his heart and soul into it!

" MICK IS A NANCE FOR DOING THE GRAMMY'S. "


Perks   , what is a " Nance "  ?

Is that like an ' English ' Phrase or something ?

Developing ........................

J Fly !

a 'nancy boy' ?

Just as well he didnt call him a 'nonce'. That would have been much worse!

Joey wrote on Feb 5^th, 2011 at 4:54pm:

" MICK IS A NANCE FOR DOING THE GRAMMY'S. " Perks   , what is a " Nance "  ? Is that like an ' English ' Phrase or something ? Developing ........................ J Fly !

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nance   ..

THE KINGS ENGLISH,MAN !

My sources tell me he rehearsed Let's Work.

Some Guy wrote on Feb 5^th, 2011 at 7:59pm:

My sources tell me he rehearsed Let's Work.

You need better sources. :aimama

Some Guy wrote on Feb 5^th, 2011 at 7:59pm:

My sources tell me he rehearsed Let's Work.

____________________________


Why did you have to mention that? Now I need to sleep with my barf bucket close by (again ...after all these years).


The song is uninspired garbage and the video made Sesame Street look like Citizen Kane.


....Yes, I'm Ian Billen and even I have to call it like it is on that one.....

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nance   ..

THE KINGS ENGLISH,MAN ! "


" nance   /næns/  Show Spelled
[nans]  Show IPA

–noun Slang:  Disparaging and Offensive .
1. an effeminate male.
2. a homosexual male.
Use nance in a Sentence
See images of nance
Search nance on the Web

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1905–10; shortened from given name Nancy
Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2011.
Cite This Source | Link To nance
Word Origin & History

nance

"effeminate man, homosexual," 1904, from female name Nancy (q.v.), which was in use as an adj. meaning "effeminate" (applied to men) from 1883, a shortening of earlier Miss Nancy,  perhaps from the nickname of vain, fashionable actress Miss Anna Oldfield (d.1730).  "

I'll be watching you Micky!

MWAH!

I'll be watching for Mick too, don't know what I have to put up with before he comes on, if it's Justin Beaver I'm changing channels.

Ian Billen wrote on Feb 6^th, 2011 at 12:28am:

Some Guy wrote on Feb 5th, 2011 at 7:59pm: My sources tell me he rehearsed Let's Work. ____________________________ Why did you have to mention that? Now I need to sleep with my barf bucket close by (again ...after all these years). The song is uninspired garbage and the video made Sesame Street look like Citizen Kane. ....Yes, I'm Ian Billen and even I have to call it like it is on that one.....

You havent lived until youve seen the footage of him miming to it on Top of The Pops.

And if you HAVE lived, you may not want to any longer ...

I saw a commercial about it and it mentioned Mick. I'm all over this.

Bob Dylan just added to the live performers list.........

sure to hear how he upstaged Jagger.

gimmekeef wrote on Feb 10^th, 2011 at 10:42am:

Bob Dylan just added to the live performers list.........

Soy bomb revisited?

Bob Dylan and Dr. Dre to Perform at the Grammy Awards
Dylan will share stage with Mumford & Sons and the Avett Brothers; Dr. Dre will join Eminem
Bob Dylan
Taylor Hill/FilmMagic
Share172
By Matthew Perpetua
February 10, 2011 9:50 AM ET
http://assets.rollingstone.com/assets/images/story/bob-dylan-and-dr-dre-to-perform-at-the-grammy-awards-20110210/1000x306/main.jpg

Bob Dylan and Dr. Dre are the latest music icons to join the lineup of performers at Sunday's Grammy Awards telecast in Los Angeles. Dylan is set to join Mumford & Sons and the Avett Brothers for a three-song suite of folk rock numbers.

Exclusive Video: Mumford & Sons Live at Rolling Stone

Dr. Dre will make an appearance during Eminem's performance, which will also include Maroon 5 frontman Adam Levine.

Photos: Grammys' Wildest Fashion Moments

The rest of the lineup – which happens to feature every act nominated for Album of the Year and Best New Artist – includes Arcade Fire, Lady Gaga, Muse, Lady Antebellum, Katy Perry, Cee Lo Green, Gwyneth Paltrow, Rihanna, Drake, Barbra Streisand, Esperanza Spalding, Miranda Lambert, Justin Bieber, Usher, Bruno Mars, B.o.B., and Janelle Monáe.

Photos: Katy Perry Strips Down for Rolling Stone

Christina Aguilera, Jennifer Hudson, Martina McBride, and Florence and the Machine's Florence Welch will also perform a tribute to Aretha Franklin, while Mick Jagger and Raphael Saadiq will salute the late Solomon Burke.

Bob Dylan to Perform With Mumford & Sons and Avett Brothers in a Special Salute to Acoustic Music, Dr. Dre to Perform on the Grammy Stage For the First Time, Joining Eminem For a Historic Performance on Music's Biggest Night [Grammy.com]
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/bob-dylan-and-dr-dre-to-perform-at-the-grammy-awards-20110210

Will we get a surprise appearance from Keith?  :blankfriggingstare1 :forfucksake :aimama

Or are the Grammys a paltry honor?

I think Mick will sing  "If You Need Me"...

" Or are the Grammys a paltry honor?  "


<  ----- Compared to the Kennedy Center Honors    ....... " YES !!!!! "

 Anyone have the inside scoop as to what time Mick or Bobby is scheduled to be on?

Don't wanna see all the bullshit leeding up to them...

Not at all.

But I must admit, I have "Grammy Fever" going on...

steel driving hammer wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 9:28am:

Anyone have the inside scoop as to what time Mick or Bobby is scheduled to be on? Don't wanna see all the bullshit leeding up to them... Not at all. But I must admit, I have "Grammy Fever" going on...

I read that Mick will perform during the Memorium segment and Bob will perform during the Folk segment.

peace,
Martha

Dylan, the Avetts and the Mumfords will be performing 'Maggie's Farm'.

steel driving hammer wrote on Feb 11^th, 2011 at 6:09am:

Will we get a surprise appearance from Keith?  :blankfriggingstare1 :forfucksake :aimama Or are the Grammys a paltry honor?

They're not even that, as Mick isnt even up for an award!

Now I'm thinking Mick will sing Everybody Needs Somebody To Love.

Mick'l do good w/ the brass horns and pointing his finger w/ the "I need you, you and you's...

Does anyone get the feeling that this is more about creating publicity for the Grammys by getting a huge name like Mick to come on and do a duet or two with some younger singers than it is about celebrating Solomon Burke? Even with Solomon Burke, most media would first mention his weight and then the wonderful songs and amazing voice. It just strikes me as a little bit odd that they would pick him when they don't do it for many others. Still maybe someone in the Grammy organization had a soft spot for him.

" I read that Mick will perform during the Memorium segment and Bob will perform during the Folk segment. "

Bless You Me Stonesian Queen .


I am now so excited to see Mick tonight that I am typing this with my penis AND nipples !!!!!!

Joey wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 11:57am:

" I read that Mick will perform during the Memorium segment and Bob will perform during the Folk segment. " Bless You Me Stonesian Queen . I am now so excited to see Mick tonight that I am typing this with my penis AND nipples !!!!!!

PLEASE don't HURT yourself darling. ;-)

I am carefully recording this so as not to be subjected to Enema or Lady Doo Doo...oh and That pint sized prick Bieber....Why Mick? Why???

Gazza wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 10:00am:

Dylan, the Avetts and the Mumfords will be performing 'Maggie's Farm'.

 How do you know this G????
xoxoxo

Meggie sent me a link to a video of the rehearsal :

http://www.humyo.com/FRvdnmR/Facebook.mp4?a=l5YTFV4DshU

Sound quality is poor but it's 'Maggie's Farm' !

Gazza wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 12:37pm:

Meggie sent me a link to a video of the rehearsal : http://www.humyo.com/FRvdnmR/Facebook.mp4?a=l5YTFV4DshU Sound quality is poor but it's 'Maggie's Farm' !

Actually,that's better than Bob usually sounds. ;) ;D

The Wick wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 11:42am:

Does anyone get the feeling that this is more about creating publicity for the Grammys by getting a huge name like Mick to come on and do a duet or two with some younger singers than it is about celebrating Solomon Burke? Even with Solomon Burke, most media would first mention his weight and then the wonderful songs and amazing voice. It just strikes me as a little bit odd that they would pick him when they don't do it for many others. Still maybe someone in the Grammy organization had a soft spot for him.

Yeah your right. Solomon Burke isn't the most well known name to a lot of people. But they got Jagger's attention with the idea. So that's a good thing.

" Actually,that's better than Bob usually sounds.  "

Christ , that is posting on loan from GOD right there !!!!!!!!!!

Gazza wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 12:37pm:

Meggie sent me a link to a video of the rehearsal : http://www.humyo.com/FRvdnmR/Facebook.mp4?a=l5YTFV4DshU Sound quality is poor but it's 'Maggie's Farm' !

G, please find a Mick rehearsal.

I know you can do it...

Gazza wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 12:37pm:

Meggie sent me a link to a video of the rehearsal : http://www.humyo.com/FRvdnmR/Facebook.mp4?a=l5YTFV4DshU Sound quality is poor but it's 'Maggie's Farm' !

 

It most certainly is Maggies!  Now, will he stick to that for showtime!  :-) Thanks G!

xoxoxo

Bob always sounds good.  Always.

gimmekeef wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 12:07pm:

I am carefully recording this so as not to be subjected to Enema or Lady Doo Doo...oh and That pint sized prick Bieber....Why Mick? Why???

 Oh I am so with you on that one.  We can fast forward through most of the vomitus producing acts and listen to the real artists!  But do me a favor and catch Arcade Fire, the Avetts, and the Mumfords, and then maybe Zac Brown and Lady Antebellum and a few others..    ;)

I hope m&m slips and falls...

Ga Ga is at it again.http://awards.music.yahoo.com/blog/90-lady-gaga-arrives-in-giant-egg-at-grammy-awards?nc

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 6:38pm:

Ga Ga is at it again.http://awards.music.yahoo.com/blog/90-lady-gaga-arrives-in-giant-egg-at-grammy-awards?nc

'Look at me, I'm out-RAGEOUS!'

What an attention whore.

Guess it worked - no doubt it's all everyone will be talking about tomorrow.

Yawn.

Waiting for a glimse of MICK at The Grammys! I'm excited! Should be soon now....MMMMMMMMIIIICCCCCKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!
:willya

I hope someone puts up a video here, cause I ain't sittin' through a whole damn awards show for a few minutes of Mick.  :wtf1

I can't stand to watch anymore.

Goodnight.

Sleeptight.

Catch you in the morning sunshine...

MICK JAGGER is a fvcking rock Icon! MICK will show them how it's done, uh huh fvcking hell yeah!
:willya

This show blows. They better get Mick out there soon or else I'll just check YouTube in the morning.

Dylan's singing Maggies Farm. his voice is shot. Harmonicas great! Back ups are really good.

At least he didn't show up in a fucking egg.

Steel Wheels wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 8:34pm:

At least he didn't show up in a fucking egg.

Well, he did pop out of a lotus a few years back.  :blankfriggingstare1

I'm glad I missed that.

This Ce CE guy is s knob
looks like a bad Elton John on acid

bring on Mick suckers !
:retarded

I'm a sucker for singing and dancing puppets.

i bet Mick wont be in an egg, sitting on a trapeze, or dressed as a bad Elton John on acid.
Tight pants, shirt and the rooster strut is all the original punk needs.

:thatwassmart

Saving the best for last.

Mick's never shown up in an egg......But he's fertilized a few in his time.

Mick's still the fuckin' man. Proof positive right now, although he is pronouncing "you" in 10 different ways possible, haha.

Until the video is available from tonight...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPS6fttq0C8


BTW I thought Mick kicked it, it was better than that Rain Fall Down shite from a few years back, for sure!

Thank God for the internet. Someone on IORR posted a link and as soon as I clicked on it their was Muck. He looked and sounded great. Thankfully I don't have to watch the rest of it. Now we really need a fucking tour. :willya :willya :willya

Ladies and gentlemen, the King has just held court and had his minions clammering at his feet..

I love the fact there wasn't one ass resting on a seat while Mick did his magic and worked the room.



I NEED A FUCKING TOUR!

Never liked the pretentious blowhard Babs but you gotta admit, she was born to sing.

He looked and sounded great! He'd look better with the rest of the dudes but not bad at all. He classed up the joint.

Micks busy, Ronnie's kind of busy, Keith did...Pirates, and Charlie's Charlie.  Just leave Blondie out this time, and tour!  They can do ENSTL as one of their 'deep cuts'  ;D !!!

parmeda wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 9:47pm:

Ladies and gentlemen, the King has just held court and had his minions clammering at his feet.. I love the fact there wasn't one ass resting on a seat while Mick did his magic and worked the room. I NEED A FUCKING TOUR!

Amen my Stones Sister.

He NAILED it.
Looks Tour ready to me.
No one works a stage like him. NO ONE.

:will-ya  :wtf2  :retarded

LJ.

LadyJane wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 10:03pm:

parmeda wrote on Feb 13th, 2011 at 9:47pm: Ladies and gentlemen, the King has just held court and had his minions clammering at his feet.. I love the fact there wasn't one ass resting on a seat while Mick did his magic and worked the room. I NEED A FUCKING TOUR! Amen my Stones Sister. He NAILED it. Looks Tour ready to me. No one works a stage like him. NO ONE. :will-ya  :wtf2  :retarded LJ.

Will Smith was in agreeance.

Somebody looked and sounded tour ready... - www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGO70fNgfY0

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/05Es2vhgso6iB/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/09Dk6dq7cB3eQ/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/06jn4eg0rGa6d/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0gsGc4t9G91nj/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/03y542V47T9MD/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/04hU9jqah97eS/900x.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/03oHdU5eiwcKK/900x.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0bT3gA14X6auY/900x.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/07xP2KL2zLeI9/900x.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0fCLdfC34Z5O4/900x.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/06vjcEu7xS6nj/900x.jpg
Reuters


http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/01UqeDMaO0auY/900x.jpg
AP

left shoe shuffle wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 10:20pm:

Somebody looked and sounded tour ready... - www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGO70fNgfY0 http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r3125490878.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r4109125471.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r1635767970.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r2531415700.jpg Reuters

I wanted to see it start where his back is turned with the cape.

left shoe shuffle wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 10:20pm:

Somebody looked and sounded tour ready... - www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGO70fNgfY0 http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r2486509937.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r3125490878.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r4109125471.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r1635767970.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r306724223.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r2531415700.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r4219668434.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r2646942026.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r3035692823.jpg http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20110214/i/r3445453801.jpg Reuters

That didn't take long. Thanks Lefty.

I haven't watched the Grammy since about 1992, glad You Tube is here is for me.

More pictures, these by Leter Cohen with thanks to Moy

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-01.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-02.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-03.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-04.jpg

Lip synced.  Not very well also. Mick dropped the ball around the 1:40 mark.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGO70fNgfY0&feature=player_embedded#at=19

voodoo....our header has been taken down by grammys!

here's another....until it gets taken down....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wca1Rc0wYLQ

Mick still kills.  He scared the shit out of Streisand, who next started her own song like the Aguilara National Anthem.

He scared that guitar player, too, chasing him up the stairs.  Anybody know that guy's name?  He's this year's "Soy Bomb."

No knock against the captures above and below - but it played better than it captured, even with the lip-synch.

LO;L They are quick, I'm saving the one you posted just in case, also it's bigger

rest assured, mick will live until he's about 130.

at 67, he's in incredible shape! i was sweating just watching him.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-05.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-06.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-07.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-08.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-09.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-10.jpg

robpop wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 11:01pm:

Lip synced.  Not very well also. Mick dropped the ball around the 1:40 mark. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGO70fNgfY0&feature=player_embedded#at=19

_____________________


This performance was not lip synced...  was it??? ...


Ian

Ian Billen wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 11:18pm:

robpop wrote on Feb 13th, 2011 at 11:01pm: Lip synced.  Not very well also. Mick dropped the ball around the 1:40 mark. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGO70fNgfY0&feature=player_embedded#at=19 _____________________ This performance was not lip synced...  was it??? ... Ian

Yeah it was.  Moonie posted on facebook before in was taken down.  Jagger hung the mike up around the 1:40-!:45 mark, and his voice kept singing.  He tried to come back, but it was obvious.  I still have the video up.  I'll try to load it to my facebook wall.

noo, you can't sync that!

where is the lipsynch????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wca1Rc0wYLQ



:whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha

Mick Jagger and Raphael Saadiq Conjure Solomon Burke's Spirit at Grammys

Posted on Feb 13th 2011 by Brian Voerding

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.spinner.com/media/2011/02/mick-jagger-and-raphael-saadiq-456-021411.jpg
Matt Sayles, AP

In his Grammy debut, Mick Jagger conjured the outsized spirit -- and wardrobe -- of soul singer Solomon Burke, who died last year. The show-stopping performance came immediately after the show's annual In Memoriam segment.

Jagger, in a tribute to "The King of Rock 'n' Soul," strutted onstage wearing a luscious gold cape, a nod to the traditional royalty garb Burke loved performing in. He and Raphael Saadiq dove into a performance of one of Burke's most well-known hits, 'Everybody Needs Somebody to Love' and strutted across the stage, thrusting his fists toward the audience and at one point pulled the standing crowd into a series of call and responses.

At times, it was easy to forget that Jagger fronts a rock band and not a blistering soul group, watching him bow and stutter-step and swing his way across the stage with the interminable energy of a superstar soul singer. At one point, he drew guitarist Raphael Saadiq into the fray, chasing him around the stage and finished the song with an extended chorus refrain that felt -- if Grammy producers had been willing -- as if it could have carried well toward the dawn.

The only other time Jagger has appeared at the Grammys was via satellite a quarter-century ago when the Rolling Stones accepted a lifetime achievement award. Maybe he knew his first time in person needed to be something unforgettable. He delivered.

Spinner

Deathgod wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 11:34pm:

where is the lipsynch???? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wca1Rc0wYLQ :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha

_________________________

Your righty right. Mick was NOT lipping this...  It's possible the video didn't sync to the audio in a spot of previous versions of the song performed but thats it. I looked here from 140-145 and its live singing ... no debauchery and no lip sync.


Ian

:areyoufuckingserious

PEOPLE >>>>> Let's cut Mr. Jagger a break tonight ok. The song he performed had NO LIP SYNCING by him.... he was singing ...alright...


This was all live singing. Mick's not gonna lyp sync in front of a live audience. The guy may stoop to a lower level or two every now and again but he's not gonna disgrace himself by lip syncing in front of a live audience and/or on world-wide television.

Geesh let's give the guy some credit and respect.... Some people are acting as if he's just another Brittany Spears lip syncing away or something...


Ian

Ian Billen wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 12:08am:

It's possible the video didn't sync to the audio in a spot of previous versions of the song performed but thats it.

Say what??

:-?

Goddammit, just when I changed my post to say I'm acknowledging the lip-synch, so as not to look gullible even though I only saw it live and the uploads keep getting yanked so I can't check it - then you upload a stable clip and decide there's no soundtrack.

ROCKS OFF, Y U NO GIMME SHELTER WEN I'M DRUNK?

left shoe shuffle wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 12:17am:

Ian Billen wrote on Feb 14th, 2011 at 12:08am: It's possible the video didn't sync to the audio in a spot of previous versions of the song performed but thats it. Say what?? :-?

_________________________

Meaning .... there may of been a choppiness or a sort of delay in a spot due to youtube's stream, or your ISP that made it appear that way to some. However, never did I see it on any of the clips I watched. There were no indications of any lip syncing. Every time he sang you heard it .... and no ....there was not any of Micks vocals occurring without him singing into the mic. Sounded live, looked live, and it was....


Ian

I've just seen it................................he's still got it !

I'd like to see him do this number on 9th March !

sc uk

Deathgod wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 11:34pm:

where is the lipsynch???? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wca1Rc0wYLQ :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha

This is a cleaned up clip.... :areyoufuckingserious

http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=344805

Mick Jagger
53rd Grammy Awards
Staples Center
Los Angeles, CA
February 13, 2011


Lineage: Digital cable > WinTV-HVR (clear QAM) > PC > .mpg

"Everybody Needs Somebody To Love" - A Tribute to Solomon Burke


Size: 707 MB
Length: 5:53

Audio:
AC-3
48000 Hz
384 kb/s
6 channels

Video:
MPEG-2
1920 x 1080
16:9
29.97 fps
16.4 Mbps




From spinner.com:

In his Grammy debut, Mick Jagger conjured the outsized spirit -- and wardrobe -- of soul singer Solomon Burke, who died last year. The show-stopping performance came immediately after the show's annual In Memoriam segment.

Jagger, in a tribute to "The King of Rock 'n' Soul," strutted onstage wearing a luscious gold cape, a nod to the traditional royalty garb Burke loved performing in. He and Raphael Saadiq dove into a performance of one of Burke's most well-known hits, 'Everybody Needs Somebody to Love' and strutted across the stage, thrusting his fists toward the audience and at one point pulled the standing crowd into a series of call and responses.

At times, it was easy to forget that Jagger fronts a rock band and not a blistering soul group, watching him bow and stutter-step and swing his way across the stage with the interminable energy of a superstar soul singer. At one point, he drew guitarist Raphael Saadiq into the fray, chasing him around the stage and finished the song with an extended chorus refrain that felt -- if Grammy producers had been willing -- as if it could have carried well toward the dawn.

The only other time Jagger has appeared at the Grammys was via satellite a quarter-century ago when the Rolling Stones accepted a lifetime achievement award. Maybe he knew his first time in person needed to be something unforgettable. He delivered!

MR ROCK -MICK JAGGER that is.

He was so great. He's a force of nature.
Made me think how much we do need a Stones fix.

I've seen it on youtube, then watched it on my lcd big screen 1080p tv & didnt seen any miming. How do you mime his ad libs? He got so carried away there is no way he could have mimed without really giving it away.

He blew everyone off the stage.

Nothing to be surprised about, here: another wonderful performance by Mick.

Now, can Keith keep up with this man over the course of a World Tour? Hmm…  

There is no way that was a lip sync.  I'm with Corgi - how do you lip sync the ad libs?  I watched it live and didn't think it was.

After a knock performance like that I'm hoping it gives Mick the performing bug though.

Just watched it on my phone via You Tube.

For a guy who hasnt been on a stage for over a year and considering that was a live TV appearance, that was a pretty good performance. It seemed to bring the house down.

Didnt think it was as sensational as some others did (it was an easy choice of song - would have loved to have seen him sing 'Cry To Me' instead, but that wouldnt have got the crowd worked up the same way and 90% of them probably wouldnt have known it), but he did very well and I dont think anyone could really complain about his performance.

Ok, so now that we're all agreed you've still 'got it', Mick, how about you perform a bit more often than five minutes a year?

I'm still outraged that they dressed Stevie Wonder in a giant peacock outfit and had Paltrow on top of his piano!

Almost 70, he still puts Justin Bieber to shame!

WOW!!

I'm still singing, You, You, You...

Anybody get teary eyed?

You can cry to me...

Bitch wrote on Feb 13^th, 2011 at 8:33pm:

Dylan's singing Maggies Farm. his voice is shot. Harmonicas great! Back ups are really good.

well, yeah his voice has been 'shot' - for all conventional purposes - for about 25 years. Its not gonna get any better at this stage. Its all in the phrasing these days.

Bob on a cheesy, mainstream Tv awards show - I feared the worst, but I kinda liked it. He does his own thing and to hell with everyone else.  In a perverse way, I like seeing some of the outrage from the sort of music fans who cant see beyond the synthetic slickness of most of the performers on these shows.

Not as great as his Grammy performances in 1980, 1998 or 2002 - but still better than the 'Masters of War' trainwreck he did in '91 when he got the Lifetime Achievement Award which prompted one critic to ask in all seriousness if he was singing in Hebrew..  [smiley=2vrolijk_08.gif]

A good showcase with two of the best new bands around. The Avett Brothers are especially excellent. I liked the 'hootenanny' feel to the whole thing.

steel driving hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 7:48am:

Almost 70, he still puts Justin Bieber to shame! .

Why is this considered an achievement ? No wonder he puts him to shame - he's fucking shit!

If you look at almost every post on YouTube now that features any act over 50, you only have to scroll down a comment or two to find some post along the lines of 'this is real music - not that Justin Bieber/Lady Ga Ga crap'.

WE shouldn't need to defend OUR music by having to compare it to soulless, plastic crap that isn't even on the same planet.

More pics...

http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/tgVVepO_gPfl.jpg

http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/BS_KXEno5HTl.jpg

http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/W3b8TSuZUCEl.jpg

http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/jfFQ4RmTEASl.jpg

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/ec7xYGr9Hozl.jpg

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/CDU2XSiI7zkl.jpg

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/IIqH_ZovxaEl.jpg

http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/rO_0CvHsNQel.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/024F4Hn7wX6XG/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0de63552I87H2/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0gz7ciu6OR07O/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0g1f7pF9eI3Up/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0aBJ9HO6oK7jT/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0b2eaGK613cQN/x900.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/04EM4oucsBdBL/900x.jpg
Getty Images

Very good performance. Lip sync? Are you serious. I knew we'd find a flaw but that's out there, no way that was lip synced. That's just crazy talk.

And Rihanna is too hot.

It had everything.  So happy to see everyone just loves Mick.  Except his hairstylist--why did she think it wise to put some curl in his bangs??

MICK THE MAGNIFICENT.  ;D

He was amazing! Completely the performance of the night, even for non-Stones freaks. :)

I was up and DANCIN'.....woo! Couldn't sit down. One of my fave early Stones performances was when they went from "Mona" to "Everybody Needs Somebody To Love". Nothin' more exciting!!!


:smilebrian :smilemick :smilestu :wow

When I saw that I thought the audio drifted off sync, unless they have some prohibition against music actually being performed live.

That's obviously a new vocal, it sure isn't the original album version and I am pretty sure it's not the Wiltern or Olympia.

I loved it.  It was the natural choice of song for the occasion, like a New Orleans second line following a funeral.
Not sure why some people think a more difficult, or challenging, song was needed. It's not figure skating after all. By the same token, since the song is basically an extended vamp, I don't really see why the rest of the Stones couldn't have rehearsed that one tune. I reckon because it would take a team of lawyers six weeks to work out the specifics for each band member. Either Way, Raphael Siddiq and his band were great and Mick reminded everyone what a great frontman he is. It also doomed Barbra Streisand who followed him, which gives me a guilty chuckle.  I'm sure Solomon would've approved.

Now a question for those who may know, was the cape he shook off at the beginning last night the same cape Solomon Burke gave him at the Wiltern that time?

Mick TOOK the Grammy stage as his own.....he is amazing...and TOUR READY indeed!  It was wonderful!  He stole the show, hands down baby.

Bob was great too, but the camera was not in good position and he was miked poorly.   I wish they would have used a stationary long shot so I could see his full Jolsonesque delivery.  He was going for it!  

xoxoxo,
Martha

robpop wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 2:44am:

Deathgod wrote on Feb 13th, 2011 at 11:34pm: where is the lipsynch???? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wca1Rc0wYLQ :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha :whydontcha This is a cleaned up clip.... :areyoufuckingserious

Totatly not lip synched. :sad

polytoxic wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:32am:

Now a question for those who may know, was the cape he shook off at the beginning last night the same cape Solomon Burke gave him at the Wiltern that time?

It's not the same as the Wiltern !

Sorry that Keith was not Hangin around ( maybe arthritics damages), but Jagger still be awesome performer and singer !

Mick did bring the house down!  And he did it without fires, lights, cheesy costumes, cheesy dancers, and cheesy theatrics...
My one criticism...I just wish he would have done a medley instead of carrying the one song on for way way too long.


As for Dylan.. Everyone knows his voice is shot!  But I admire the man as he continues to want to make music and does it his own way.  He sure looked like he was having a good time!  And those two bands (both of whom I love) were just thrilled to be out there on the stage with him.

Martha wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:34am:

He stole the show, hands down baby.

That's the front news cover of this newspaper in Mexico, he stole it. Thanks Rogerriffin for this one!

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e185/rogerarturo/cronica14feb.jpg

polytoxic wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:32am:

I loved it.  It was the natural choice of song for the occasion, like a New Orleans second line following a funeral. Not sure why some people think a more difficult, or challenging, song was needed. It's not figure skating after all. By the same token, since the song is basically an extended vamp, I don't really see why the rest of the Stones couldn't have rehearsed that one tune. I reckon because it would take a team of lawyers six weeks to work out the specifics for each band member.

I didnt say I think it was needed. If I'd the choice, I'd have preferred 'Cry To Me'. Just a personal preference because he does soul ballads pretty well. 'Everybody Needs Somebody' was the obvious and right choice for the occasion.

And you're right about it being regrettable that the Stones couldnt have bothered their arses to get together for a few hours to rehearse this. Pretty much what I said at the start of the thread. A missed opportunity to show the world that they still EXIST. A song thats pretty easy to play and which they nailed night after night on the Licks tour.

Todays header is not one of the better pictures available.

Martha wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:34am:

Mick TOOK the Grammy stage as his own.....he is amazing...and TOUR READY indeed!  It was wonderful!  He stole the show, hands down baby. Bob was great too, but the camera was not in good position and he was miked poorly.   I wish they would have used a stationary long shot so I could see his full Jolsonesque delivery.  He was going for it!   xoxoxo, Martha

Somewhat intriguingly, the guitarist playing with Bob was none other than Harvey Mandel - formerly of Canned Heat, and who plays guitar on 'Hot Stuff' and 'Memory Motel' on 'Black and Blue' - ie, the guy who almost replaced Mick Taylor in the Stones.

Stu Kimball has already announced he's playing guitar with Dylan on tour in 2011. Will Mandel be replacing Charlie Sexton?

It would have been so cool is after he finished the song, the lights went down then the curtain rises and it's the rest of the Stones. Then they play Plundered...

Mandel is a fine player. Nice to see him back with an A-lister...

The only thing turned me on besides Mick´s performance  :perverted :perverted :perverted

...and WTF with that gay-black bird I just wanted to kill IT  :forfucksake :forfucksake :forfucksake

http://i525.photobucket.com/albums/cc337/respectable_2008/gwyneth-paltrow-cee-lo-green-grammys-07.jpg

Gazza wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:47am:

polytoxic wrote on Feb 14th, 2011 at 9:32am: I loved it.  It was the natural choice of song for the occasion, like a New Orleans second line following a funeral. Not sure why some people think a more difficult, or challenging, song was needed. It's not figure skating after all. By the same token, since the song is basically an extended vamp, I don't really see why the rest of the Stones couldn't have rehearsed that one tune. I reckon because it would take a team of lawyers six weeks to work out the specifics for each band member. And you're right about it being regrettable that the Stones couldnt have bothered their arses to get together for a few hours to rehearse this. Pretty much what I said at the start of the thread. A missed opportunity to show the world that they still EXIST. A song thats pretty easy to play and which they nailed night after night on the Licks tour.

Do you think the ideal was ever brought up to Keith at all. Or was this a not so subtle FU to Keith for the book. Even if it wasn't intentional. People are talking about Mick's onstage performance and not what he wrote in a book. Me thinks that's a good thing. :smilestu

real wild child wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 10:53am:

The only thing turned me on besides Mick´s performance  :perverted :perverted :perverted ...and WTF with that gay-black bird I just wanted to kill IT  :forfucksake :forfucksake :forfucksake http://i525.photobucket.com/albums/cc337/respectable_2008/gwyneth-paltrow-cee-lo-green-grammys-07.jpg

Stevie Wonder?.......god what a mess that was........

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 11:00am:

Gazza wrote on Feb 14th, 2011 at 9:47am: polytoxic wrote on Feb 14th, 2011 at 9:32am: I loved it.  It was the natural choice of song for the occasion, like a New Orleans second line following a funeral. Not sure why some people think a more difficult, or challenging, song was needed. It's not figure skating after all. By the same token, since the song is basically an extended vamp, I don't really see why the rest of the Stones couldn't have rehearsed that one tune. I reckon because it would take a team of lawyers six weeks to work out the specifics for each band member. And you're right about it being regrettable that the Stones couldnt have bothered their arses to get together for a few hours to rehearse this. Pretty much what I said at the start of the thread. A missed opportunity to show the world that they still EXIST. A song thats pretty easy to play and which they nailed night after night on the Licks tour. Do you think the ideal was ever brought up to Keith at all. Or was this a not so subtle FU to Keith for the book. Even if it wasn't intentional. People are talking about Mick's onstage performance and not what he wrote in a book. Me thinks that's a good thing. :smilestu

Good point. Which reminds me to ask seeing as I've only watched the performance on a cell phone....

Did his cock look normally proportioned?

Not that I care one way or the other, I'm just surprised some people havent mentioned it yet....  :blankfriggingstare1

How many people in the world can pull of a performance like that? Zero. He truly is amazing and it's amazing how he had the entire crowd mesmerized. I know it's stating the obvious but no one can even come close to him and what he does. The other thing is that he showed the world what true rhythm and blues and soul is. I only watched the bits before Jagger's performance to make sure I didn't miss it and the only thing worth watching was Dylan. That Aretha Franklin tribute was unbearable.

I saw you Micky!

Looking Good!  Looking Real Good!

Wanna @#%?

No?

Damn!

The Wick wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 11:44am:

How many people in the world can pull of a performance like that? Zero. He truly is amazing and it's amazing how he had the entire crowd mesmerized. I know it's stating the obvious but no one can even come close to him and what he does. The other thing is that he showed the world what true rhythm and blues and soul is. I only watched the bits before Jagger's performance to make sure I didn't miss it and the only thing worth watching was Dylan. That Aretha Franklin tribute was unbearable.

I liked the Aretha Franklin tribute, Cristina Aguilera and Jennifer Hudson especially.

Poor Bob Dylan, he sounded like he needed a glass of water and some cough drops.  But, he did alright.  He is a living legend after all.

Mick's performance was by far the best of the night, without a doubt, he did it with just his singing & moves, didn't need all the other theatrical props most of the rest used, he's in fine form for sure for a tour, I just hope he doesn't get it in his head to do a solo tour.
I don't know how long this is going to stay on Youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56FQMbErj7I

The Wick wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 11:44am:

How many people in the world can pull of a performance like that? Zero. He truly is amazing and it's amazing how he had the entire crowd mesmerized. I know it's stating the obvious but no one can even come close to him and what he does. The other thing is that he showed the world what true rhythm and blues and soul is. I only watched the bits before Jagger's performance to make sure I didn't miss it and the only thing worth watching was Dylan. That Aretha Franklin tribute was unbearable.

You said it so well!  Mick was great! And the crowd was mesmorized!

[quote  [/quote]

I didnt say I think it was needed. If I'd the choice, I'd have preferred 'Cry To Me'. Just a personal preference because he does soul ballads pretty well. 'Everybody Needs Somebody' was the obvious and right choice for the occasion.

And you're right about it being regrettable that the Stones couldnt have bothered their arses to get together for a few hours to rehearse this. Pretty much what I said at the start of the thread. A missed opportunity to show the world that they still EXIST. A song thats pretty easy to play and which they nailed night after night on the Licks tour.
[/quote]


Actually I didn't have you in mind when I wrote that, I'm all for "Cry To Me" - fantastic song and I love  Stones version.  I'd have loved to hear Mick do  Down In The Valley or Home In your Heart as well. I was thinking of a bunch of folks on a iorr.org thread that kept going on about him needing to a song with "a greater degree of difficulty" to prove he can still sing.

Mick needs to prove WHAT?  That he can still sing?  Keith must be over at IORR posting under a pseudonym.

Gwenyth stole the show!!!

Gazza wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 11:19am:

Did his cock look normally proportioned?

Let me watch that video about 10 more times and I'll let you know.  ;)

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b107/jsoxy/Silly%20Stuff/RORules.jpg

Mick looked great and stole the show (christ Topogeejo could have done that though)....a tad long with the repetitive words but he showed again his ability to command an audience.

SweetVirginia wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 1:58pm:

Gazza wrote on Feb 14th, 2011 at 11:19am: Did his cock look normally proportioned? Let me watch that video about 10 more times and I'll let you know.  ;) http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b107/jsoxy/Silly%20Stuff/RORules.jpg

Better you than me SV. :blankfriggingstare1

Oh shit, Youtube took the header video off, it had over 500 hits, I wonder why Grammy is not allowing it?

What I think people are missing is how tight the band supporting him were. I had not really paid attention to Rafael Saddiq before but I will from now on. He played some nice stuff.

Agree. Caught Saadiq a while back on PBS' 'Live From The Artists Den'.

Loved the classic old school Motown vibe, and it led me to pick up a copy of 'The Way I See It'.
Great stuff, imo.

Looking forward to his forthcoming album, 'Stone Rollin''.
He's posted a coupla videos from it, including the super-infectious 'Radio'.

Check 'em out  - www.youtube.com/user/RaphaelSaadiqVEVO#p/u

Available now in the newsgroups in very high quality

alt.binaries.boneless
alt.binaries.dvd.music

---

" How many people in the world can pull of a performance like that? Zero. He truly is amazing and it's amazing how he had the entire crowd mesmerized. I know it's stating the obvious but no one can even come close to him and what he does.  "

Amen !!!!!


Last Night was the BEST MICK YET !!!!!!!!!!!!!


" A True Rock N' Roll Star , Ronnie !!!! "

O'kins

now all knows...

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e185/rogerarturo/INGLES.jpg

Of course I LOVED seeing MICK perform again, truly fabulous! Afvckingmazing! The only thing that bothered me is that it looked like MICK pushed Raphael S not once but twice. The second time Raphael appears to run away, its fvking funny! Was MICK hogging the spotlight or was MICK just overly enthusiastic?

Bitch wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:06pm:

Of course I LOVED seeing MICK perform again, truly fabulous! Afvckingmazing! The only thing that bothered me is that it looked like MICK pushed Raphael S not once but twice. The second time Raphael appears to run away, its fvking funny! Was MICK hogging the spotlight or was MICK just overly enthusiastic?

Kinda reminds me of the way Mick used to push Ronnie & Bill around on stage.  :smilemick

Bitch wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:06pm:

The second time Raphael appears to run away, its fvking funny! Was MICK hogging the spotlight or was MICK just overly enthusiastic?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GF6GjGQy0o

Mick is winning in "Legends" poll for Grammys Night!

So vote for MICK!

http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2011/02/grammys-2011-legends-bob-dylan-mick-jagger-and-barbra-streisand-perform-who-was-the-best.html

Bitch wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:06pm:

Of course I LOVED seeing MICK perform again, truly fabulous! Afvckingmazing! The only thing that bothered me is that it looked like MICK pushed Raphael S not once but twice. The second time Raphael appears to run away, its fvking funny! Was MICK hogging the spotlight or was MICK just overly enthusiastic?

Yeah Bitch. I just think Mick was pumped to be on stage and clowning around. Nothing against Saadiq who played his part well.

rogerriffin wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 6:55pm:

now all knows... http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e185/rogerarturo/INGLES.jpg

:blankfriggingstare1 :blankfriggingstare1 :blankfriggingstare1

Bitch wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 9:35pm:

Mick is winning in "Legends" poll for Grammys Night! So vote for MICK! http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2011/02/grammys-2011-legends-bob-dylan-mick-jagger-and-barbra-streisand-perform-who-was-the-best.html

Voted, Mick is on the lead

Some more píctures (last batch) sent by moy © Kevin Mazur, Jeff Kravitz and Lester Cohen

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-11.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-12.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-13.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-14.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-15.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-16.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-17.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-18.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-19.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-20.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-21.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-22.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-23.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-24.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-25.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-26.jpg

Ahhhh,there's the black widow. Mick must have on foot tall elevators to come eye to eye with L'Wren.

Mick Jagger blew everyone away, last night, as I was hoping AND knew  he would. all the NON BELIEVERS IN my OFFICE HAD TO ADMIT, HE STOLE THE SHOW WITH  his performance and SINGING. AND THANK GOD HE DID NOT SHOW UP IN AND EGG, cause he does not need to. Mr Mick Jagger Is Rock and Roll  :keithpunky
That was great.

Great performance, great photos   :) 8-)
  Thanks everyone for sharing

that's what they call doing your best Jagger.

Kilroy wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 12:23am:

Mick Jagger blew everyone away, last night, as I was hoping AND knew  he would. all the NON BELIEVERS IN my OFFICE HAD TO ADMIT, HE STOLE THE SHOW

One of my friends said Mick was doing nothing but posing for five min.

That's what you call a frontman.

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 11:43pm:

Ahhhh,there's the black widow. Mick must have on foot tall elevators to come eye to eye with L'Wren.

I'm thinking that she's perfected the art of elegantly slumping just enough to get into the same photo frame as he is.  ;) It's quite a talent! ;D :P

gorda wrote on Feb 14^th, 2011 at 12:15pm:

The Wick wrote on Feb 14th, 2011 at 11:44am: How many people in the world can pull of a performance like that? Zero. He truly is amazing and it's amazing how he had the entire crowd mesmerized. I know it's stating the obvious but no one can even come close to him and what he does. The other thing is that he showed the world what true rhythm and blues and soul is. I only watched the bits before Jagger's performance to make sure I didn't miss it and the only thing worth watching was Dylan. That Aretha Franklin tribute was unbearable. I liked the Aretha Franklin tribute, Cristina Aguilera and Jennifer Hudson especially. Poor Bob Dylan, he sounded like he needed a glass of water and some cough drops.  But, he did alright.  He is a living legend after all.

There is nothing poor about Bob.  His voice has been like this for decades now.  He loves the gravel sound.  He's in no need of sympathy.

Look how stupid ABC is, the title is "Who Stole The Grammys" and they just mention the mishaps, THATS IT!

No mention of Mick at all! WTF?

http://omg.yahoo.com/videos/grammy-talk/13141

I'm not violent but I wanna punch this guy in the face.

But here's a pro Mick review...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rF16J13VTRs

Sioux wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 7:45am:

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 14th, 2011 at 11:43pm: Ahhhh,there's the black widow. Mick must have on foot tall elevators to come eye to eye with L'Wren. I'm thinking that she's perfected the art of elegantly slumping just enough to get into the same photo frame as he is.  ;) It's quite a talent! ;D :P

LOL Sioux. I just looked at it again. She does have a slight slouch. Hell Mick almost looks taller. :forfucksake

Mick put a lot into that one-song performance.

Anyone think he can do that for two hours, every other night for an entire tour?

I'm still beaming.

Edith Grove wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 9:19am:

Mick put a lot into that one-song performance. Anyone think he can do that for two hours, every other night for an entire tour?

Let alone Keith...

Edith Grove wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 9:19am:

Mick put a lot into that one-song performance. Anyone think he can do that for two hours, every other night for an entire tour?

Good question. He did seem a bit tired at the end of that. But like you said,he put everything into that one performance. I'm sure with pacing and more shows he'll be fine. He doesn't have to run around like that on every song, every night.

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 9:49am:

Edith Grove wrote on Feb 15th, 2011 at 9:19am: Mick put a lot into that one-song performance. Anyone think he can do that for two hours, every other night for an entire tour? Good question. He did seem a bit tired at the end of that. But like you said,he put everything into that one performance. I'm sure with pacing and more shows he'll be fine. He doesn't have to run around like that on every song, every night.

do a bump and eat a banana

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 9:49am:

Edith Grove wrote on Feb 15th, 2011 at 9:19am: Mick put a lot into that one-song performance. Anyone think he can do that for two hours, every other night for an entire tour? Good question. He did seem a bit tired at the end of that. But like you said,he put everything into that one performance. I'm sure with pacing and more shows he'll be fine. He doesn't have to run around like that on every song, every night.

Mick once said in a rolling stone interview, the one "Jagger remembers" that he paces himself so that he's got slow numbers, combined with faster ones so not to tire himself out.

Some Guy wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 10:21am:

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 15th, 2011 at 9:49am: Edith Grove wrote on Feb 15th, 2011 at 9:19am: Mick put a lot into that one-song performance. Anyone think he can do that for two hours, every other night for an entire tour? Good question. He did seem a bit tired at the end of that. But like you said,he put everything into that one performance. I'm sure with pacing and more shows he'll be fine. He doesn't have to run around like that on every song, every night. do a bump and eat a banana

Ok I will,but what about Mick? :pullanolte

The performance witnessed Sunday evening at the Grammys is yet another example of the genius of Mick Jagger.

What is it with the trainers though. Nice suits and shirts, but he spoils it with horrible footwear.

paul wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 2:38pm:

What is it with the trainers though. Nice suits and shirts, but he spoils it with horrible footwear.

It doesn't matter how nice his suits and shirts are when such naff footwear is visable - can't someone have a word with him?

I DONT KNOW WHAT EVERYONE IS BABBLING ON ABOUT.
MICK PERFORMED FINE FOR A 67 YEAR OLD SINGER,AND BETTER THAN THE DRIVEL THAT PRECEDED HIM.
BUT IT SURE AS HELL AINT 1981 MICK
OR EVEN 2002 MICK.
MY HOPE IS THE TOURS ARE DONE, DUDES ARE OLD.

Honky Tonk Man wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 2:43pm:

paul wrote on Feb 15th, 2011 at 2:38pm: What is it with the trainers though. Nice suits and shirts, but he spoils it with horrible footwear. It doesn't matter how nice his suits and shirts are when such naff footwear is visable - can't someone have a word with him?

And while we are on the subject, L'Wren doesn't really flatter him. She looks more like an accessory.

Mick rehearsing at the Grannys...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgR3t2wHrNw&feature=player_embedded

Edith Grove wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 9:19am:

Mick put a lot into that one-song performance. Anyone think he can do that for two hours, every other night for an entire tour?

right now? No.

Despite how good he was the other night, at 67 to get ready for a tour requires a lot of preparation and a pretty solid fitness regime. He's not going to be in that kind of condition as he's sung no more than two songs in public in the last three and a half years.

However, he's the ultimate professional when it comes to something like that, and you can guarantee that by the time a tour does come around he'll be in the best condition its possible for him to be in, even though by necessity it'll be natural for him to pace himself to whatever intensity level is necessary for him to consistently perform well for a prolonged period.

" Despite how good he was the other night, at 67 to get ready for a tour requires a lot of preparation and a pretty solid fitness regime. He's not going to be in that kind of condition as he's sung no more than two songs in public in the last three and a half years.

" However, he's the ultimate professional when it comes to something like that, and you can guarantee that by the time a tour does come around he'll be in the best condition its possible for him to be in, even though by necessity it'll be natural for him to pace himself to whatever intensity level is necessary for him to consistently perform well for a prolonged period.  "



I am STILL typing with me penis ( ......................................forty - eight hours later )


" Priapism , ..............Ronnie  ?!!!! "

" Priapism (Ancient Greek: πριαπισμός), known also as Hulseyism, is a potentially harmful and painful medical condition in which the erect penis or clitoris[1] does not return to its flaccid state, despite the absence of both physical and psychological stimulation, within four hours. There are two types of priapism: low-flow and high-flow. Low-flow involves the blood not adequately returning to the body from the organ. High-flow involves a short-circuit of the vascular system partway along the organ. Treatment is different for each type. Priapism is considered a medical emergency, which should receive proper treatment by a qualified medical practitioner. Early treatment can be beneficial for a functional recovery.

The name comes from the Greek god Priapus, who was noted for his disproportionately large and permanent erection. "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priapism



JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJACKY !!!!!

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 9:07am:

Sioux wrote on Feb 15th, 2011 at 7:45am: sweetcharmedlife wrote on Feb 14th, 2011 at 11:43pm: Ahhhh,there's the black widow. Mick must have on foot tall elevators to come eye to eye with L'Wren. I'm thinking that she's perfected the art of elegantly slumping just enough to get into the same photo frame as he is.  ;) It's quite a talent! ;D :P LOL Sioux. I just looked at it again. She does have a slight slouch. Hell Mick almost looks taller. :forfucksake

I know! Such a contrast to those weirdly angled pix we had on here a few years ago----with L'Wren out front and a TINY Mick following her. lol They almost look proportional in this pic. I wish I knew Mick's secret to keeping so skinny!

[quote author=paul
And while we are on the subject, L'Wren doesn't really flatter him. She looks more like an accessory. [/quote]

lol....I actually think Miss Scott compliments him perfectly. I always thought Jerry Hall was the ultimate accessory and am frankly enjoying the change of scenery.
The shoes are another matter. A nice pair of those classic Stacy Adams-type shoes would work, like he used to wear in the 60s and 70s.
But L'wren is fine by me.

texile wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 7:27pm:

[quote author=paul And while we are on the subject, L'Wren doesn't really flatter him. She looks more like an accessory.

But L'wren is fine by me. [/quote]

You don't have a choice...

Keiths close pal Johhny Depp is a Justin Bieber fan, WTF?

http://in.news.yahoo.com/johnny-depp-belieber-too-20110216-032500-041.html

Yeah, evidently they know each other. Saw a TV clip---Johnny was doing an interview for his animated movie, in a hotel lobby, and Bieber heard he was downstairs, so, he crashed the interview to say "hi". Guess the Bieb is surrounding himself with those who have been in the biz awhile, who will look out for his gentle youth at this critical time in his life.  ;)

Looks like Mick's Grammy appearance inspired some wag to tweet an RIP...

Mick Jagger is the latest victim of the Twitter death hoax

Posted at 9:21 AM ET, 02/16/2011
By Melissa Bell

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/blog-post/mick.JPG
Mick Jagger at the Grammys. ( Kevin Winter/Getty Images)

Mick Jagger has been declared momentarily dead by the Twitter masses. "RIP Mick Jagger" became a worldwide trending topic on Wednesday, despite all signs pointing to a very much alive man. It seems the trend started after Jagger's appearance at the Grammys. Peter Rosenberg, a radio disc jokey, wrote:

wait i thought this was for actual dead people...not the living dead RIP Mick Jagger ...

As news is wont to do in the giant game of Telephone played on Twitter, the joke quickly became a possible news item. However, just yesterday Mick Jagger's new Web site launched and his Facebook and his Twitter feed sent out some Grammy clips.

Mick Jagger joins an illustrious group of celebrities killed by Twitter, including Justin Bieber, Aretha Franklin and Charlie Sheen.

The Washington Post

Twitter is for twits.

Jagger blew doors

Heart Of Stone wrote on Feb 16^th, 2011 at 10:00am:

Twitter is for twits.

Could be "twats."  :aimama

What a performance, Mick has to be the fittest 67 year old around! Looks like he lost his eye lashes though, or at least didn't use as much make up as usual.

That Saadiq guy has to be the best dancing guitarist I've ever seen too!

gotdablouse wrote on Feb 16^th, 2011 at 3:34pm:

What a performance, Mick has to be the fittest 67 year old around! Looks like he lost his eye lashes though, or at least didn't use as much make up as usual. That Saadiq guy has to be the best dancing guitarist I've ever seen too!

yes but Ronnie can outwave him I bet!

Nellcote wrote on Feb 15^th, 2011 at 11:56am:

The performance witnessed Sunday evening at the Grammys is yet another example of the genius of Mick Jagger.

Agreed. Mick was magnificent!

yeah, I was diggin the way that guitar player grooved

luxury wrote on Feb 16^th, 2011 at 5:31pm:

yeah, I was diggin the way that guitar player grooved

Yes me too, he danced very good w/ Mick didn't he.

The Ancient form of Strutting double strut boogie twits was very nice.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-17.jpg

This picture is the BEST! MICK'S eyeing someone in the crowd, hard nipple poking through the silk shirt, as if to say YOU WANT SOME OF THIS?? Yeah MICK, I want some!

What's the oldest a guy has ever been who ladies wanted to bang?  Like, Hef doesn't count, I'm talking ladies wanting a guy for his 'sex drive (terrible song)', not his $ or fame.  Mick easily wins this, no (homo)?

Throwaway wrote on Feb 16^th, 2011 at 8:37pm:

What's the oldest a guy has ever been who ladies wanted to bang?  Like, Hef doesn't count, I'm talking ladies wanting a guy for his 'sex drive (terrible song)', not his $ or fame.  Mick easily wins this, no (homo)?

I'll take Mick Jagger for $100 (no homo) :smilebrian

Bitch wrote on Feb 16^th, 2011 at 7:43pm:

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-grammy-17.jpg This picture is the BEST! MICK'S eyeing someone in the crowd, hard nipple poking through the silk shirt, as if to say YOU WANT SOME OF THIS?? Yeah MICK, I want some!

Always teasing his fans!

Same as always!

I want my Micky now!

Throwaway wrote on Feb 16^th, 2011 at 8:37pm:

What's the oldest a guy has ever been who ladies wanted to bang?  Like, Hef doesn't count, I'm talking ladies wanting a guy for his 'sex drive (terrible song)', not his $ or fame.  Mick easily wins this, no (homo)?

Hef was NEVER as sexy as Mick!  Not now, Not ever!

http://www.mickjagger.com/wp-content/files_mf/mickraphael_saddiq380x120.jpg

Grammys rehearsal footage posted @ mickjagger.com

Good stuff!!

left shoe shuffle wrote on Feb 18^th, 2011 at 9:34am:

http://www.mickjagger.com/wp-content/files_mf/mickraphael_saddiq380x120.jpg Grammys rehearsal footage posted @ mickjagger.com Good stuff!!

That was great!!!! thanks LSS, it should be a header.

left shoe shuffle wrote on Feb 18^th, 2011 at 9:34am:

http://www.mickjagger.com/wp-content/files_mf/mickraphael_saddiq380x120.jpg Grammys rehearsal footage posted @ mickjagger.com Good stuff!!

Thanks a LOT lefty! Great video, and yes it's header material too, now I have plenty of Header Material to use!!

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-mjrehearsals.jpg

Mick is a gentlemen... what a simple man he is!

left shoe shuffle wrote on Feb 18^th, 2011 at 9:34am:

http://www.mickjagger.com/wp-content/files_mf/mickraphael_saddiq380x120.jpg Grammys rehearsal footage posted @ mickjagger.com Good stuff!!

Oh...that's WAY beyond good stuff.  Roll that wonderful Mick footage!

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Feb 18^th, 2011 at 5:23pm:

left shoe shuffle wrote on Feb 18th, 2011 at 9:34am: http://www.mickjagger.com/wp-content/files_mf/mickraphael_saddiq380x120.jpg Grammys rehearsal footage posted @ mickjagger.com Good stuff!! Thanks a LOT lefty! Great video, and yes it's header material too, now I have plenty of Header Material to use!! http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y28/gliedo/Second/i1-mjrehearsals.jpg Mick is a gentlemen... what a simple man he is!

nice!!

He's ready to tour.
Let's start the show.
I'm sick of waiting.
Mick is too!!!!

" He's ready to tour.
Let's start the show.   "


<  ------ One week later and Joey is STILL typing with his penis !!!!!



So true Little Buddy ( Little Fijikins ....oh , Lil' Fiji   ... Lil' Fijikins )

Great Header Video, thanks LSS, love that rehearsal.