ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board | |
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far behind http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1243963583 Message started by Paranoid Android on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 12:26pm |
Title: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far behind Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 12:26pm
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Technology/GameOn/wireStory?id=7731525
I have never played it...but it's a popular franchise and there are ALOT of bars that feature "Rock Star Nights"... I would try it for a chance to tear up JJF or Bitch!!! |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 12:44pm
Doubt it, unless the Stones can make millions off it. Still one of my favorite times was rockin' out to Gimme Shelter on Rock Band!
|
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Saint Sway on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm
its inevitable
I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Pdog on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
al queda, brussel sprouts and cold sores! |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Sioux on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 7:07pm
Saw this on TV. The graphics were good. Covers the period from the Sullivan show all the way to the Rooftop concert. About 40-45 songs, I think.
|
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by mojoman on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 7:31pm
hasnt woody been playing this for years?
:aimama |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by mojoman on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 7:31pm Pdog wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm:
these are a few of my favorite things? |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 5:31am mojoman wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 7:31pm:
:wtf3 |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 5:31am Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
:wow |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by corgi37 on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 6:26am
Stones beaten by the Beatles again.
|
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Gazza on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am Pdog wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm:
Sway's almost right. As long as it's kitsch and not involving unreleased music, anything is fair game. Unfortunately there's still more chance of them slapping a tongue logo on Brussel Sprouts than there is of them doing so on Brussels '73. |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Saint Sway on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 11:52am Gazza wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am:
"they'll slap a logo on Brussel Sprouts before Brussels '73" BOO YAH!!!! Thats what we call POSTIN OVER SUPERMAN!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Pdog on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:06pm Gazza wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am:
I'm already for Exile re-issue dissapointment. |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 4th, 2009 at 5:33pm Pdog wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:06pm:
Maybe it WILL be a ROCK STAR tie-in |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by corgi37 on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:16am
Imagine all the hassles of them trying include ABCKO stuff!
THis would be great though. And the guitar would HAVE to be a blonde Tele. The ultimate aim would be for the player to be on stage with the band. Which means they'll have to tour. So bring it on! |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:18am Gazza wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am:
I would say "sadly" but at this point it's par for the course... |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:18am Pdog wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:06pm:
Same here...I fully expect to be disappointed and angered by it until proven wrong... |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:20am corgi37 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 6:26am:
Yep... Lennon said in 1968 or so that anything the Beatles pioneered, the Stones were sure to copy it 6-8 months later (and this is not a dig...I love the Stones, obviously, but I *do* love the Beatles that much more...) |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Lazy Bones on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:25am StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:20am:
Of course. You think Lennon would admit to the reverse? |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:46am Lazy Bones wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:25am:
Of course not...cos it ain't true. Look, I *love* the Stones, but they weren't innovators...just a kick-ass fucking awesome rock and roll band!! |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Saint Sway on Jun 5th, 2009 at 11:00am
any chance they'll release a Tim Reis Soft Jazz Star game?
|
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Saint Sway on Jun 5th, 2009 at 11:41am
read in the new issue of Rolling Stone that Weezer is now selling Snuggies at their shows.
you know thats just burning up Jagger that another band beat him to that I'm tellin ya the poor fella in charge of merchandising at the RS dot com store is getting a beat down as we speak |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 12:33pm Saint Sway wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 11:41am:
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by GotToRollMe on Jun 5th, 2009 at 2:42pm
Here's something they could slap a tongue on (though Jagger is conspicuous by his absence):
http://www.cynthiapcaster.org/ |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Ten Thousand Motels on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:14pm GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 2:42pm:
Oh no. Not that again. ;D That fraud was dubunked years ago. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl6yXBnLYYM |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by GotToRollMe on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:53pm Ten Thousand Motels wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:14pm:
Try Google. |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Ten Thousand Motels on Jun 5th, 2009 at 4:01pm GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:53pm:
I can't go along with it. Exploiting people like that ... in weak moments. Kiss n Tell is not cool as far as I'm concerned. |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:34pm StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 12:33pm:
call me dumb...but what is a "snuggie"??? |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Accidental Alignment Motels on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:43pm Paranoid Android wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:34pm:
LOL. It's a ..... |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by corgi37 on Jun 7th, 2009 at 7:24am
Rolling Stones "Singstar", "Rock band" & "Guitar hero".
All at once! Let's see u2 top that! P.s. Fuck the Beatles. |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Gazza on Jun 7th, 2009 at 9:37am corgi37 wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:16am:
Surely with their new contract the ABCKO problem only now applies to the US ? Universal, as I understand it, own the Decca rights, so their catalogue for the rest of the world outside the US has been 'unified'. |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by corgi37 on Jun 8th, 2009 at 6:43am
And thats nice, Gazza. Except the U.S. is probably the largest games market in the world. It would be unprofitable not to include it. But i guess it could be over come by just including post 71 stuff. I dont think too many folks want to jam along to Tell me or Dandelion.
I hope it happens 1 day. Imagine being on stage with the lads in 72? WOnder if we get to hang with Keef backstage. And the groupies! Think of the groupies! If ya gonna do it, do it right. |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Gazza on Jun 8th, 2009 at 7:52am
as long as it's the groupies that would have been around in 1972 or 1978, and not three decades later...... :necrophillicpost
|
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Ten Thousand Motels on Jun 8th, 2009 at 8:39am GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:53pm:
I was just kidding GTRM. They pulled it off. Quite a coup actually. |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 8th, 2009 at 9:36am Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 7:52am:
Like that one from the CS Blues movie? :wow |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by GotToRollMe on Jun 8th, 2009 at 10:08am Ten Thousand Motels wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 8:39am:
Let's hope nothing else got "pulled off" in the process! Dunno if I'd wanna succumb to a plaster cast in such a sensitive area...LOL (Doesn't look like they got many A-list rockers anyway...) |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Gazza on Jun 8th, 2009 at 3:55pm StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 9:36am:
thats EXACTLY the one I meant....although now I mention it, maybe you meant the chicks on the plane. I was actually thinking of the one that was filmed 'performing' for the camera on her bed...... :blankfriggingstare1 |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 9th, 2009 at 5:53am Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 3:55pm:
Same here...you could get lost in that forest! :Youmakeagrownmancrylikejoey |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by corgi37 on Jun 10th, 2009 at 5:43am
It's got to be modern women for sure. Shaven havens mean no crabs!
It would be cool if you had to work your way up through the organisation. Start off (say) as a roadie then go up to Keef's drug supplier, before audtioning and... nah, boring. Just bring something out. They are losing out on the games world big time. Nothing since the VL thing! |
Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be Post by Mel Belli on Aug 19th, 2009 at 5:43pm StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:20am:
Oh, please, do we have to rehash this again?! To cite, and rebuff, one of Lennon's claims: "We Love You" copped from "All You Need Is Love," two songs that had absolutely zero in common with each other. Gimme a break. Must've been the H talking. |
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |