ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far behind
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1243963583

Message started by Paranoid Android on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 12:26pm

Title: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far behind
Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 12:26pm
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Technology/GameOn/wireStory?id=7731525

I have never played it...but it's a popular franchise and there are ALOT of bars that feature "Rock Star Nights"...

I would try it for a chance to tear up JJF or Bitch!!!

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 12:44pm
Doubt it, unless the Stones can make millions off it.  Still one of my favorite times was rockin' out to Gimme Shelter on Rock Band!

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Saint Sway on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm
its inevitable

I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Pdog on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
its inevitable

I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money


al queda, brussel sprouts and cold sores!

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Sioux on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 7:07pm
Saw this on TV. The graphics were good. Covers the period from the Sullivan show all the way to the Rooftop concert. About 40-45 songs, I think.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by mojoman on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 7:31pm
hasnt woody been playing this for years?

:aimama

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by mojoman on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 7:31pm

Pdog wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm:

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
its inevitable

I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money


al queda, brussel sprouts and cold sores!





these are a few of my favorite things?

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 5:31am

mojoman wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 7:31pm:
hasnt woody been playing this for years?

:aimama


:wtf3


Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 5:31am

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
its inevitable

I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money


:wow

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by corgi37 on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 6:26am
Stones beaten by the Beatles again.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Gazza on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am

Pdog wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm:

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
its inevitable

I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money


al queda, brussel sprouts and cold sores!


Sway's almost right. As long as it's kitsch and not involving unreleased music, anything is fair game.

Unfortunately there's still more chance of them slapping a tongue logo on Brussel Sprouts than there is of them doing so on Brussels '73.


Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Saint Sway on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 11:52am

Gazza wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am:
Unfortunately there's still more chance of them slapping a tongue logo on Brussel Sprouts than there is of them doing so on Brussels '73.


"they'll slap a logo on Brussel Sprouts before Brussels '73"

BOO YAH!!!!

Thats what we call POSTIN OVER SUPERMAN!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Pdog on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:06pm

Gazza wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am:

Pdog wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm:

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
its inevitable

I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money


al queda, brussel sprouts and cold sores!


Sway's almost right. As long as it's kitsch and not involving unreleased music, anything is fair game.

Unfortunately there's still more chance of them slapping a tongue logo on Brussel Sprouts than there is of them doing so on Brussels '73.



I'm already for Exile re-issue dissapointment.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 4th, 2009 at 5:33pm

Pdog wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:06pm:

Gazza wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am:
[quote author=Pdog link=1243963583/0#3 date=1243975376]



I'm already for Exile re-issue dissapointment.


Maybe it WILL be a ROCK STAR tie-in

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by corgi37 on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:16am
Imagine all the hassles of them trying include ABCKO stuff!

THis would be great though. And the guitar would HAVE to be a blonde Tele.

The ultimate aim would be for the player to be on stage with the band. Which means they'll have to tour.

So bring it on!

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:18am

Gazza wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am:

Pdog wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm:

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
its inevitable

I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money


al queda, brussel sprouts and cold sores!


Sway's almost right. As long as it's kitsch and not involving unreleased music, anything is fair game.

Unfortunately there's still more chance of them slapping a tongue logo on Brussel Sprouts than there is of them doing so on Brussels '73.


I would say "sadly" but at this point it's par for the course...

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:18am

Pdog wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:06pm:

Gazza wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 7:01am:

Pdog wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 3:42pm:

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 1:11pm:
its inevitable

I challenge anyone to come with something that they wouldn't slap a tongue logo on for money


al queda, brussel sprouts and cold sores!


Sway's almost right. As long as it's kitsch and not involving unreleased music, anything is fair game.

Unfortunately there's still more chance of them slapping a tongue logo on Brussel Sprouts than there is of them doing so on Brussels '73.



I'm already for Exile re-issue dissapointment.


Same here...I fully expect to be disappointed and angered by it until proven wrong...

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:20am

corgi37 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 6:26am:
Stones beaten by the Beatles again.


Yep...

Lennon said in 1968 or so that anything the Beatles pioneered, the Stones were sure to copy it 6-8 months later (and this is not a dig...I love the Stones, obviously, but I *do* love the Beatles that much more...)


Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Lazy Bones on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:25am

StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:20am:

corgi37 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 6:26am:
Stones beaten by the Beatles again.


Yep...

Lennon said in 1968 or so that anything the Beatles pioneered, the Stones were sure to copy it 6-8 months later (and this is not a dig...I love the Stones, obviously, but I *do* love the Beatles that much more...)


Of course. You think Lennon would admit to the reverse?

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:46am

Lazy Bones wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:25am:

StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:20am:

corgi37 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 6:26am:
Stones beaten by the Beatles again.


Yep...

Lennon said in 1968 or so that anything the Beatles pioneered, the Stones were sure to copy it 6-8 months later (and this is not a dig...I love the Stones, obviously, but I *do* love the Beatles that much more...)


Of course. You think Lennon would admit to the reverse?


Of course not...cos it ain't true.  Look, I *love* the Stones, but they weren't innovators...just a kick-ass fucking awesome rock and roll band!!

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Saint Sway on Jun 5th, 2009 at 11:00am
any chance they'll release a Tim Reis Soft Jazz Star game?

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Saint Sway on Jun 5th, 2009 at 11:41am
read in the new issue of Rolling Stone that Weezer is now selling Snuggies at their shows.

you know thats just burning up Jagger that another band beat him to that



I'm tellin ya the poor fella in charge of merchandising at the RS dot com store is getting a beat down as we speak

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 5th, 2009 at 12:33pm

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 11:41am:
read in the new issue of Rolling Stone that Weezer is now selling Snuggies at their shows.

you know thats just burning up Jagger that another band beat him to that



I'm tellin ya the poor fella in charge of merchandising at the RS dot com store is getting a beat down as we speak


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by GotToRollMe on Jun 5th, 2009 at 2:42pm
Here's something they could slap a tongue on (though Jagger is conspicuous by his absence):

http://www.cynthiapcaster.org/

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Ten Thousand Motels on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:14pm

GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 2:42pm:
Here's something they could slap a tongue on (though Jagger is conspicuous by his absence):

http://www.cynthiapcaster.org/


Oh no. Not that again.  ;D

That fraud was dubunked years ago.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl6yXBnLYYM

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by GotToRollMe on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:53pm

Ten Thousand Motels wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:14pm:

GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 2:42pm:
Here's something they could slap a tongue on (though Jagger is conspicuous by his absence):

http://www.cynthiapcaster.org/


Oh no. Not that again.  ;D

That fraud was dubunked years ago.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl6yXBnLYYM


Try Google.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Ten Thousand Motels on Jun 5th, 2009 at 4:01pm

GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:53pm:

Ten Thousand Motels wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:14pm:

GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 2:42pm:
Here's something they could slap a tongue on (though Jagger is conspicuous by his absence):

http://www.cynthiapcaster.org/


Oh no. Not that again.  ;D

That fraud was dubunked years ago.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl6yXBnLYYM


Try Google.


I can't go along with it. Exploiting people like that ... in weak moments.
Kiss n Tell is not cool as far as I'm concerned.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:34pm

StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 12:33pm:

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 11:41am:
read in the new issue of Rolling Stone that Weezer is now selling Snuggies at their shows.

you know thats just burning up Jagger that another band beat him to that



I'm tellin ya the poor fella in charge of merchandising at the RS dot com store is getting a beat down as we speak


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

call me dumb...but what is a "snuggie"???

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Accidental Alignment Motels on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:43pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:34pm:

StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 12:33pm:

Saint Sway wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 11:41am:
read in the new issue of Rolling Stone that Weezer is now selling Snuggies at their shows.

you know thats just burning up Jagger that another band beat him to that



I'm tellin ya the poor fella in charge of merchandising at the RS dot com store is getting a beat down as we speak


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

call me dumb...but what is a "snuggie"???


LOL. It's a .....

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by corgi37 on Jun 7th, 2009 at 7:24am
Rolling Stones "Singstar", "Rock band" & "Guitar hero".

All at once!

Let's see u2 top that!

P.s. Fuck the Beatles.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Gazza on Jun 7th, 2009 at 9:37am

corgi37 wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 8:16am:
Imagine all the hassles of them trying include ABCKO stuff!

THis would be great though. And the guitar would HAVE to be a blonde Tele.

The ultimate aim would be for the player to be on stage with the band. Which means they'll have to tour.

So bring it on!



Surely with their new contract the ABCKO problem only now applies to the US ? Universal, as I understand it, own the Decca rights, so their catalogue for the rest of the world outside the US has been 'unified'.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by corgi37 on Jun 8th, 2009 at 6:43am
And thats nice, Gazza. Except the U.S. is probably the largest games market in the world. It would be unprofitable not to include it. But i guess it could be over come by just including post 71 stuff. I dont think too many folks want to jam along to Tell me or Dandelion.

I hope it happens 1 day. Imagine being on stage with the lads in 72? WOnder if we get to hang with Keef backstage.

And the groupies! Think of the groupies! If ya gonna do it, do it right.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Gazza on Jun 8th, 2009 at 7:52am
as long as it's the groupies that would have been around in 1972 or 1978, and not three decades later...... :necrophillicpost

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Ten Thousand Motels on Jun 8th, 2009 at 8:39am

GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:53pm:

Ten Thousand Motels wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:14pm:

GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 2:42pm:
Here's something they could slap a tongue on (though Jagger is conspicuous by his absence):

http://www.cynthiapcaster.org/


Oh no. Not that again.  ;D

That fraud was dubunked years ago.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl6yXBnLYYM


Try Google.


I was just kidding GTRM. They pulled it off. Quite a coup actually.

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 8th, 2009 at 9:36am

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 7:52am:
as long as it's the groupies that would have been around in 1972 or 1978, and not three decades later...... :necrophillicpost


Like that one from the CS Blues movie?  :wow

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by GotToRollMe on Jun 8th, 2009 at 10:08am

Ten Thousand Motels wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 8:39am:

GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:53pm:

Ten Thousand Motels wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 3:14pm:

GotToRollMe wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 2:42pm:
Here's something they could slap a tongue on (though Jagger is conspicuous by his absence):

http://www.cynthiapcaster.org/


Oh no. Not that again.  ;D

That fraud was dubunked years ago.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl6yXBnLYYM


Try Google.


I was just kidding GTRM. They pulled it off. Quite a coup actually.


Let's hope nothing else got "pulled off" in the process! Dunno if I'd wanna succumb to a plaster cast in such a sensitive area...LOL
(Doesn't look like they got many A-list rockers anyway...)

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Gazza on Jun 8th, 2009 at 3:55pm

StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 9:36am:

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 7:52am:
as long as it's the groupies that would have been around in 1972 or 1978, and not three decades later...... :necrophillicpost


Like that one from the CS Blues movie?  :wow


thats EXACTLY the one I meant....although now I mention it, maybe you meant the chicks on the plane. I was actually thinking of the one that was filmed 'performing' for the camera on her bed...... :blankfriggingstare1

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by StonesFanatic on Jun 9th, 2009 at 5:53am

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 3:55pm:

StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 9:36am:

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2009 at 7:52am:
as long as it's the groupies that would have been around in 1972 or 1978, and not three decades later...... :necrophillicpost


Like that one from the CS Blues movie?  :wow


thats EXACTLY the one I meant....although now I mention it, maybe you meant the chicks on the plane. I was actually thinking of the one that was filmed 'performing' for the camera on her bed...... :blankfriggingstare1


Same here...you could get lost in that forest!  :Youmakeagrownmancrylikejoey

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by corgi37 on Jun 10th, 2009 at 5:43am
It's got to be modern women for sure. Shaven havens mean no crabs!

It would be cool if you had to work your way up through the organisation.

Start off (say) as a roadie then go up to Keef's drug supplier, before audtioning and...

nah, boring. Just bring something out. They are losing out on the games world big time.

Nothing since the VL thing!

Title: Re: ROLLING STONES: Rock Star...could it be far be
Post by Mel Belli on Aug 19th, 2009 at 5:43pm

StonesFanatic wrote on Jun 5th, 2009 at 10:20am:

corgi37 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2009 at 6:26am:
Stones beaten by the Beatles again.


Yep...

Lennon said in 1968 or so that anything the Beatles pioneered, the Stones were sure to copy it 6-8 months later (and this is not a dig...I love the Stones, obviously, but I *do* love the Beatles that much more...)


Oh, please, do we have to rehash this again?!

To cite, and rebuff, one of Lennon's claims: "We Love You" copped from "All You Need Is Love," two songs that had absolutely zero in common with each other. Gimme a break. Must've been the H talking.

ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.