Well, we all knew it would happen Jagger in a few photos
not a sign of guilt but not good. Wonder if that has anything to do with Keith not wanting to tour
We’ll see how much fallout comes from this
worse than Bill Wyman? maybe not.

I doubt this has anything at all to do with the tour or Keith not wanting to do a tour, I think it's utterly ridiculous speculation, Mick didn't do anything wrong by simply attending a normal dinner party and being in pics with Bill Clinton who btw is literally in the Shine A Light movie. Also I doubt Keith gives one single fuck about these pics, tbh I don't either, Mick can go to whatever party he likes, it's not his fault if Epstein was there too

ronnie-woody wrote on Dec 21^st, 2025 at 11:29am:

I doubt this has anything at all to do with the tour or Keith not wanting to do a tour, I think it's utterly ridiculous speculation, Mick didn't do anything wrong by simply attending a normal dinner party and being in pics with Bill Clinton who btw is literally in the Shine A Light movie. Also I doubt Keith gives one single fuck about these pics, tbh I don't either, Mick can go to whatever party he likes, it's not his fault if Epstein was there too

Hahahaha don’t stick your head in the sand hahahahaha
Remember the song just 14 about McKenzie Phillips

Mick likes to schmooz with the rich and famous. He probably didnt know what Epstein was like.

I would guess that in the 60s he probably had the odd conversation with Jimmy Savile.  Doesn't mean anything.

Mick and whatever groupie in the 70s doesn't mean anythingconcerning this, some of them even publically stated they dressed up older and wanted to impress older rockstars and lied about their age, these were entirely different times and cannot be compared to nowadays (hell even when I was a teenager in the 2000s there were 15/16 yo girls in my class who had a 23 or 25 yo boyfriend and their parents didn't even say anything)...I remember an article by some Asian actress a few years back during Me Too who said she is giving this interview to absolve Mick of any wrongdoing because he didn't do anything she didn't want to...plus Mick doesn't need Epstein as a pimp to get every girl or guy he wants^^

I believe in innocent until proven guilty and not guilt by association, the process against Epstein has been going on for a decade and not even the slightest piece of evidence against Mick has showed up yet, I'm sure if there was anything to hold against him, they'd already have done so

And this is why Rocks Off is the greatest. Until Mick is truly implicated in something illegal, I don't really care about how him being in a single picture means anything. But this site doesn't go around censoring opinions. Long live Gazza and three cheers for Voo for keeping it going.

The Wick wrote on Dec 21^st, 2025 at 2:14pm:

And this is why Rocks Off is the greatest. Until Mick is truly implicated in something illegal, I don't really care about how him being in a single picture means anything. But this site doesn't go around censoring opinions. Long live Gazza and three cheers for Voo for keeping it going.

Agreed 100% not censoring……..

Come on!

Goo wrote on Dec 21^st, 2025 at 8:10pm:

The Wick wrote on Dec 21st, 2025 at 2:14pm: And this is why Rocks Off is the greatest. Until Mick is truly implicated in something illegal, I don't really care about how him being in a single picture means anything. But this site doesn't go around censoring opinions. Long live Gazza and three cheers for Voo for keeping it going. Agreed 100% not censoring……..

Totally agree, tbh I've been very glad lately to not be able to register on IORR for whatever reason because by this point BV would have banned me for opposing too hard to some of those people over there...

Also a thing I find almost absurdly funny about these pictures is that with Mick's connections to the Crown we haven't seen a pic of him and Prince Andrew in it... there might be one and there might not but this clearly proves nothing at all, same as pics of Mick and Clinton prove nothing, seeing how Clinton is literally in Shine A Light and a Stones fan

certainly deserved to be "pic of the day" over on the Shidoobee with Stones Doug site

Even at his age, did he really need a pimp?

Trump is a pedo. The pictures prove it. Riffhard defends pedo’s. Maga scum

leonid wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2025 at 3:13am:

Trump is a pedo. The pictures prove it. Riffhard defends pedo’s. Maga scum

Hahahahahaha hilarious

Roll Me wrote on Dec 22^nd, 2025 at 6:56am:

certainly deserved to be "pic of the day" over on the Shidoobee with Stones Doug site

Shidooobeeee is a joke

Goo wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2025 at 6:21am:

Roll Me wrote on Dec 22nd, 2025 at 6:56am: certainly deserved to be "pic of the day" over on the Shidoobee with Stones Doug site Shidooobeeee is a joke

They threw a FANTASTIC KEEFmas party on Friday nite!!
Such a great, fun nite!!

;D ;D ;D

Interesting post. I also have had my thoughts about this issue. First of all it's not good that he have had contact with Epstein and visiting the island. I also learned that Epstein and Maxwell have had access to backstage or been seen standing at the side of the stage on Stones concerts. To me this raises questions about what business Mick had with Epstein. In my mind the thought of Keith not able to commit to a tour and the timing of his message that he can't commit to touring and the revelation that Mick had been on the island is rather connected I think.

As someone wrote in a post here on the board there's no evidence that Mick have been involved in any of Epstein's horrific criminalities so he shall not be accused of any of such things. But morally it is sad and bad that Mick's been involved in visiting the island and parties with Epstein and Maxwell.

Hans Jansson wrote on Apr 21^st, 2026 at 11:37am:

Interesting post.

And interesting first reply... Welcome Hans!

Hans, provide evidence or shut the fuck up...

I read EVERY mention of Mick in the e-files. Do it yourself, the e-files are searchable...

Not once is there any mention or even hint that Mick visited the island or flew
on the plane.

Not once is there any mention or even hint that e or maxwell had "backstage access"
or even ever attended a Stones show

The only item of substance are the photos of Mick having dinner in new york
with e and maxwell, at the personal invitation of clinton (photos are of an
unknown date)

there is nothing in the e-files to indicate that Mick was otherwise ever associated
with the guy before that or after.

every other mention of mick in the e-files consists of e saying stuff like "i was
sitting by the pool at the hotel and guess who walked by? Mick Jagger!"

his whole life e fan-boyed on Mick, as a celebrity not as a musician or performer. 
e pressed celebs for mick's address and phone number. e called and wrote but never
even received the courtesy of a personal reply from Mick. Instead Mick's office would
reply saying Mick was not available.

therefore this is the totality of Mick actually in the e-files: clinton invited Mick to dinner
at the home of a personal friend of clinton's. Mick had dinner and left. The End.

Jesus Rev 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@ Rev 20 Redlights


Well I guess you haven't seen the pictures of him being at a party with both of them. That is sad. But you're entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. 1st amendment so I won't shut up.  ::)

So he was at a party.   It doesn't mean anything.  There will likely have been many people who were unaware of his criminal activities and saw him as a billionaire just wanting to shmooze with the rich and famous.

Many people were unaware what Savile got up to.  He was often in the vicinity of Jagger. 

https://youtu.be/O1ikxsg69XM?si=FTr5016qKr_QSy2M

:blankfriggingstare1 :aimama :forfucksake

It's a slippery slope.

Jagger has willing women and men available to him nonstop.

He never needed Epstein (who looked like a donkey) to procure for him.   Jagger can teach a master class in "making girls".