| ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board | |
|
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1388352544 Message started by Edith Grove on Dec 29th, 2013 at 3:29pm |
|
|
Title: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by Edith Grove on Dec 29th, 2013 at 3:29pm
Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made'
What's the best camera? The one you have in your hand, particularly if it's a Sony RX-100, says Rob Reid. He test-drives the compact digital camera at a Rolling Stones concert, and enjoyed the shots as much as the show. A few months ago I saw the mighty, ever-reigning dinosaur kings of rock, the Rolling Stones. I had a general admission ticket and a small pocket camera, and arrived many hours early so I could worm my way to the front. It was a thunderous, spellbinding show. Keith, Ronnie and Darryl didn’t miss a note, Charlie didn’t miss a beat, and Mick preened and darted around the vast arena like a man one-third his age. Smirking hipsters dismiss the Stones for being old (how dare they!), for lacking modern relevance, and/or for cynically milking their fans for every last dollar. Whatever. That night I saw a band that cared deeply about its creations and its legacy. These were guys whose wealth long ago freed them from any chore they’d rather avoid. They spent that and every other show night exerting themselves to the limit to create their spectacle. I’ve seen the Stones several times over the years, but this was the first time I brought a camera. The smartphone tsunami has forced concert promoters to give up their long-running battle against fan photos. Fancy SLRs are still prohibited at lots of shows. But apart from a few hardline reactionaries like Prince, most performers let their audiences go hog wild with pocket cameras and cellphones. But what I really want to draw your attention to are the awesome capabilities you can now find in a pocket camera. With extreme lighting, fast-moving subjects, and chaotic settings, live concerts present photographers with many challenges. I hope the shots I'm sharing in this post show you that you can now achieve impressive results in the trickiest environments with the lightest of hardware. At the bottom of this post you’ll find a link to much larger versions of the photos, which will give you a better sense of their quality. My belated gift suggestion for avid photographers at ANY level of expertise is the Sony RX-100, with which I took all of these shots. It comes in two flavors: the original RX-100 (which dates back to mid-2012) and its ingeniously named successor, the RX-100 II. I can usually be convinced to upgrade to any new version of my favorite gizmos. But even as a rabid RX-100 fan, I sat out the new version, and suggest you do the same. The specs are barely improved, yet the new version will run you a couple hundred dollars more. You have to love someone a lot to buy them even the dowdy old original, which is about $500. But it’s a breathtaking piece of technology. I bought mine shortly after it first came out, when the David Pogue--a reviewer not prone to hyperbole, at least not for products by makers other than Apple--began a New York Times piece with the words, “This is a review of the best pocket camera ever made.” Eighteen months later, I believe his introduction remains largely accurate. The RX-100 has many superpowers. And one of the most important ones might strike some people as obscure: its ability to shoot images in the RAW format. Thousands of carefully chosen words can be written about RAW, but the Cliff Notes are that it gives unbelievable after-the-fact control over the tone and quality of light in an image. Harnessing this power requires sophisticated software, and I’m a huge fan of Lightroom by Adobe. This will run you about a hundred bucks, but (much more significantly) I’d say you should expect to spend about a hundred hours truly mastering it. The good news is that you can spread this over a year or more, because you’ll start achieving amazing things almost immediately, and the complete learning process will be a joy to anyone who loves engaging in digital images. I’ve read plenty of Lightroom books over the years, and the by-far best in my view is Scott Kelby’s. If you steadily work your way through this gem, testing out everything he discusses, you will gradually become a true Lightroom ninja. Take your time and enjoy the journey. That journey should absolutely include smuggling your camera into every concert that you attend. If you’re interested in this sort of thing, you should absolutely read this detailed and articulate discussion of concert photography and hardware (including the RX-100) by Jason DeBord. Jason’s wonderful blog features a constant procession of shows that he documents using both professional and civilian camera gear. I absolutely recommend the RX-100 and similar cameras to photographers at any level, including pros with enough fancy gear to fill a Hummer. I have a wonderful, cumbersome SLR that takes stunning images, but I wouldn’t want to lug it into 90% of the environments I inhabit from day to day. It’s a truism that the best camera for any situation is the one that you happen to have with you at the time. Usually, this will be your cellphone. If you’re lucky enough to go on a safari, you may be lucky enough to own a Canon 7D, and you should absolutely pack it. But for those in-between situations that call for both fabulous imagery and super-portable technology, high-end pocket cameras are really starting to deliver the goods. And as with all things tech-related, you can expect today’s top-of-the-line performance to migrate into bargain prices within a few years. Incidentally, is it just me, or does it look like Charlie is about to be swallowed by a gigantic Stones logo up there? The things you can do with a Jumbotron these days… Anyway – if you enjoy these images, I’ve posted much larger versions of them and dozens of others in this SmugMug photo album: http://robreid.smugmug.com/Music/Rolling-Stones-Philadelphia-II/30177824_rXpfp7#!i=2595798692&k=3HPWtrx Click on the large image on the right side of the screen to see it in ultra-big form, and then navigate through the album using your arrow keys. Enjoy, and happy holidays! Published 4:48 pm Mon, Dec 23, 2013 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Rob Reid is an entrepreneur and author of the science fiction novel Year Zero. http://boingboing.net/2013/12/23/taking-pictures-of-the-rolling.html Don't forget the rest of the pics here: http://robreid.smugmug.com/Music/Rolling-Stones-Philadelphia-II/30177824_rXpfp7#!i=2595798692&k=3HPWtrx |
|
Title: Re: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by Tumbling Dijs on Dec 29th, 2013 at 5:23pm
Being an (amateur) photographer for more than 40 years, who has gone digital 15 years ago, and owns several SLR and pocket cameras, I refuse to believe these are made with a digital pocket camera. I'm convinced this belongs in the category "misleading advertising" (of course imho)
|
|
Title: Re: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by Egon on Dec 30th, 2013 at 4:20am
Wow talk about "product placement"
|
|
Title: Re: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by Edith Grove on Dec 30th, 2013 at 5:25am Tumbling Dijs wrote on Dec 29th, 2013 at 5:23pm:
Yeah, could be. The author is described as an "entrepreneur," so perhaps he does have some interest in the product, but he did get some great pictures, no? |
|
Title: Re: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by MarshallG on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:21am Tumbling Dijs wrote on Dec 29th, 2013 at 5:23pm:
I concur. I've been an amateur guerilla photographer in the dry ice for 30 odd years. I doubt they were taken by a RX100. I would like to believe they were as getting something like that in would be a lot easier than my current camera. |
|
Title: Re: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by Edith Grove on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:27am
Welcome to the board, MarshallG !
|
|
Title: Re: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by SweetVirginia on Dec 30th, 2013 at 10:50am
I call bullshit as well. I just looked up the camera and it only has a 3.6x zoom. Not enough to get such zoomed (even if cropped a lot in post production) pix.
And the lack of digital noise is telling. I use a Sony Nex 6 most of the time in concerts and have had some great results, but Sony is kind of known for being noisy. Regardless of the guy's motivation in promoting that camera, he did get some great shots. |
|
Title: Re: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by MarshallG on Dec 31st, 2013 at 6:11am Edith Grove wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:27am:
Thanks Matey, it has only taken me 4 years to post. |
|
Title: Re: Taking pictures of the Rolling Stones with the 'best pocket camera ever made' Post by FotiniD on Dec 31st, 2013 at 6:40am SweetVirginia wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 10:50am:
Thanks for that SV, I got over-excited with the photos and was thinking of maybe saving up for this camera. Sure it's a nice one, and the video tests I checked out on youtube look good as well, but yeah, the lack of noise is indeed fishy. |
|
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |