I'm bored with all that guest , don't you ? :scary :stinkypost :interestingstuffronnie :pukey :aimama :smilemick :nooslajaleisk

I agree !

Not so much bored as much as UN-excited...

I would rather much like to see their contemporaries come and play with them...
Macca...Clapton ( like in UK)...Ray Davies...Daltry...Townshend...or some
of their 70's "rivals"...Joe Walsh...Stevie Nicks...Carley Simon...Page...Plant...Bob Weir , Rod Stewart...

Folks who were actually there during the 50 years they are celebrating...

Just to name a few

You joke, but this could well be a possibility.
Oh well, As long as it's not in hydepark.

he's on UMG, he's from Ontario and the Stones are playing two shows in Toronto in the next few weeks.

he also seems to have some good dope in his tour entourage at present.

be afraid.

Just checked his tour schedule - and thankfully, on the day I see the Stones at Hyde Park (6th July) he'll be performing elsewhere.

In some shithole called Omaha, no less.  :blankfriggingstare1

Not just any shithole...that's the hole most other shitholes come out of...and the place smells like feet...

In Hyde Park you will have Artics Monkeys :-)  

I don't like the name of this thread!!!!!! Justin Bieber??you got to be kidding?? in his universe Stones songs are like something from the roaring 20's. I pray not.

" In Hyde Park you will have Artics Monkeys  "



<   ------- Sure beats Panic at the Disco .

munichhilton wrote on May 12^th, 2013 at 4:47pm:

Not just any shithole...that's the hole most other shitholes come out of...and the place smells like feet...

well above the rim.

Hyde Park = Paul Weller
He has openings from his tour both dates

I was going to ask, is the reason they are having all these guests almost every other night because it is a special 50 year sort of Anniversary tour? ....


....or is this a new marketing thing for them they plan on doing from here on out since their will be less shows, they have to spruce them up as much as they can?


Any idear whether this is a "one time thing" on this tour to have so very many special guests almost every other show (in which I think it is) or is it going to be like this from here on out at Stones mini-tours?


Ian

Like I said on the Katy Perry thread.

All of these guests - bar Waits & Raitt - are on UMG. (GaGa is on UMG too)

Theyve picked a different song each time.

Everything is pointing in one direction here, unfortunately - and thats an album of live duets with (mostly or exclusively) other UMG artists.

If so, it'll be the most horrendous and cheesy thing they've ever done - where guest artists are measured by the fact they share a record label rather than any musical connection. A nightmare hodge podge of crossover duets which will appeal to almost no one. The ultimate corporate whore release.

Gazza wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 5:46am:

Like I said on the Katy Perry thread. All of these guests - bar Waits & Raitt - are on UMG. (GaGa is on UMG too) Theyve picked a different song each time. Everything is pointing in one direction here, unfortunately - and thats an album of live duets with (mostly or exclusively) other UMG artists. If so, it'll be the most horrendous and cheesy thing they've ever done - where guest artists are measured by the fact they share a record label rather than any musical connection. A nightmare hodge podge of crossover duets which will appeal to almost no one. The ultimate corporate whore release.

If sadly that is the case then we can expect at least one "rapper' or hip hopper I would think.

Here a link to hypothetics "Duets artists "

http://www.universalmusic.com/artists

I would welcome Justin Bieber as a guest only if it was guaranteed that as soon as he stepped foot on stage Keef would whack him with the tele..  :scary

I would like McCartney or Pete Townshend to guest at Hyde Park, wishful thinking as he is on tour at the same time, purely so I can say that I've seen them and won't have to fork out to see them seperately.

Rollin92 wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 8:01am:

I would welcome Justin Bieber as a guest only if it was guaranteed that as soon as he stepped foot on stage Keef would whack him with the tele..  :scary I would like McCartney or Pete Townshend to guest at Hyde Park, wishful thinking as he is on tour at the same time, purely so I can say that I've seen them and won't have to fork out to see them seperately.

McCartney on I wanna be your man ? could be a good idea ...

gimmekeef wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 6:41am:

Gazza wrote on May 13th, 2013 at 5:46am: Like I said on the Katy Perry thread. All of these guests - bar Waits & Raitt - are on UMG. (GaGa is on UMG too) Theyve picked a different song each time. Everything is pointing in one direction here, unfortunately - and thats an album of live duets with (mostly or exclusively) other UMG artists. If so, it'll be the most horrendous and cheesy thing they've ever done - where guest artists are measured by the fact they share a record label rather than any musical connection. A nightmare hodge podge of crossover duets which will appeal to almost no one. The ultimate corporate whore release. If sadly that is the case then we can expect at least one "rapper' or hip hopper I would think.

http://youtu.be/HLo3ok8aQDA

gimmekeef wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 6:41am:

If sadly that is the case then we can expect at least one "rapper' or hip hopper I would think.

I truly wonder if Shattered was the Stones' attempt at hip hop.
Barking/chanting lyrics, NYC in the mid-seventies, etc., and you know how Mick likes to be trendy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYvy3kBYN4Q

riffkeither wrote on May 12^th, 2013 at 4:59pm:

In Hyde Park you will have Artics Monkeys :-)

The Arctic Monkeys are fantastic:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQH8ZTgna3Q

Gazza wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 5:46am:

Like I said on the Katy Perry thread. All of these guests - bar Waits & Raitt - are on UMG. (GaGa is on UMG too) Theyve picked a different song each time. Everything is pointing in one direction here, unfortunately - and thats an album of live duets with (mostly or exclusively) other UMG artists. If so, it'll be the most horrendous and cheesy thing they've ever done - where guest artists are measured by the fact they share a record label rather than any musical connection. A nightmare hodge podge of crossover duets which will appeal to almost no one. The ultimate corporate whore release.

This could be the scariest prospect ever. So cynical. The Stones have long been coasting on their legacy and catalog, but this move would be an indefensibly lame one. Though, unfortunately, it does seem like something that Mick would happily sign onto. It would be a last hurrah money grab and it would kill any vestige of the "bad boy" image that defined them for so long. Whoring out their own songs for a 30 silver pieces. As far as sales goes that figure isn't far off. The Rolling Stones-Shitting Their Own Bed...with guests! Weak! Should this ever happen it would officially shut the door on my fandom. I'd still listen to the records, but as for any future releases, merch., tickets, etc. you can count me out. I hope you're wrong Gazza, but I suspect you aren't.


Riffy

Mick is probably a "Belieber". He likes the bubblegum pop stuff.

Boomy wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 11:19am:

Mick is probably a "Belieber". He likes the bubblegum pop stuff.

You just might end up with UMG's Billion hiter K-Pop sensation PSY...

STONE'M STYLE!!!

http://937krbjkqor6nu5h.zippykid.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/bieberjustin170211.jpeg

Justin wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 1:40pm:

http://937krbjkqor6nu5h.zippykid.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/bieberjustin170211.jpeg

For the love of christ why is that vile little urchin everywhere these days, Mick step away from the un-talented. He tried to pick a fight with a cockney the other month..I enclose it for your leisure

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7qn5txKk44

Rollin92 wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 4:02pm:

Justin wrote on May 13th, 2013 at 1:40pm: http://937krbjkqor6nu5h.zippykid.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/bieberjustin170211.jpeg For the love of christ why is that vile little urchin everywhere these days, Mick step away from the un-talented. He tried to pick a fight with a cockney the other month..I enclose it for your leisure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7qn5txKk44

Right on!! I'm from Ontario Canada where that little asshole comes from, he's nothing but pure hype, the media made him, but he had some bastard manager do a colonel Parker with the internet & the media today behind him, he's got no talent whatsoever, just a bunch of crap, or like Johnny Rotten would like to say: Just a pile of shit.

Gazza wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 5:46am:

Like I said on the Katy Perry thread. All of these guests - bar Waits & Raitt - are on UMG. (GaGa is on UMG too) Theyve picked a different song each time. Everything is pointing in one direction here, unfortunately - and thats an album of live duets with (mostly or exclusively) other UMG artists. If so, it'll be the most horrendous and cheesy thing they've ever done - where guest artists are measured by the fact they share a record label rather than any musical connection. A nightmare hodge podge of crossover duets which will appeal to almost no one. The ultimate corporate whore release.

________________________________________


OOOOOOO no! I never even thought of that... but you have got a point here.  ...Please tell me your wrong on this one...


I was figuring there was something to all of these special guests all the time... I was hoping it was simply in celebrating their big "5-0"  ...and now you brought up something that is a just dreadful.


Wow... say it ain't so mayyyne.


Ian

I wouldn't be surprised if it's the new live album.  Basically the entire tour is a 2 month recording session, trying to compile all the guest performances.  Those sneaky dudes.

Gazza is probably jesting / making an assumption.