ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knighthood'.
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1342036451

Message started by FPM on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:54pm

Title: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knighthood'.
Post by FPM on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:54pm
Evidently Keith wasn't the only one who thought a knighthood for Mick
was a bad idea!


from the Telegraph:

The Queen avoided personally giving Sir Mick Jagger his knighthood because she thought he was an inappropriate candidate for honour, it has been claimed.


6:30AM BST 11 Jul 2012

The 86 year-old monarch is said to have not had "the stomach" to present the Rolling Stone's frontman in 2003 on account of his anti-establishment views.

She is also said to have disliked the star's s relationship with her sister, the late Princess Margaret, and as a result asked the Prince of Wales to give him his knighthood instead.

The Queen was said to have deliberately scheduled an operation to remove cartilage from her left knee for the day before Jagger received one of the country's highest honours.

The claims were made in a new controversial, and unauthorised, biography 'Mick: the Wild Life and Mad Genius of Jagger', which was released in America in Tuesday.

Jagger once called the Queen "Chief Witch" and proclaimed "anarchy is the only slight glimmer of hope".

Related Articles
David Bowie and Mick Jagger's long-rumoured love affair revealed in new book
10 Jul 2012
Tony Blair, the former Prime Minister, was said to have repeatedly tried to add Jagger’s name to the Honours List but was rebuked by the Queen because he was "not suitable", the Daily Mail reported.

When his name was finally added, the book's author Christopher Andersen Andersen quotes an anonymous Royal aide saying: "The Queen looked at Mick Jagger’s name on that list, and there was absolutely no way in the world that she was going to take part in that. So she simply arranged to be elsewhere."

On December 13 2003 he eventually accepted his honour, but the Queen was not there to give it to him.

She said to have told one of her doctors at King Edward VII Hospital in London: "I would much rather be here than at Buckingham Palace knighting a certain party."

His book also details the lurid and numerous affairs Jagger, 68, is said to have had with both sexes.

The author has alleged that Jagger, who had seven children by four women, had a long-term love affair with fellow musician David Bowie in the 1970s.

In his new book, the writer claims that Angie Bowie, who was married to David at the time, returned to their London home to find the two men asleep together in her bed.

Both men apparently woke up with a start.

"Do you want some coffee?" she asked, and returned a few minutes later with coffee and orange juice on a tray.

The escapade is outlined with quotes from friends and family, and according to Andersen: "Ava Cherry, a backup singer who lived with the Bowies for a time, reportedly told a friend that 'Mick and David were really sexually obsessed with each other. Even though I was in bed with them many times, I ended up just watching them have sex'."

After meeting in the early Seventies, Andersen says that both stars became fascinated with one another.

Not long after their first encounter in 1973, when Mick visited Bowie backstage at one of his concerts, Andersen claims that their relationship quickly turned physical.

Jagger is also said to have had an affair with Carla Bruni, the wife of former French president Nicolas Sarkozy, and courted Angelina Jolie with "desperate phone calls" for two years.

Neither Jagger nor Buckingham Palace have commented on the book.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/9391107/Why-the-Queen-refused-to-hand-Mick-Jagger-a-knighthood.html

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Edith Grove on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:57pm
Here, Charles, YOU do it !  :perverted

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:24pm

Edith Grove wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:57pm:
Here, Charles, YOU do it !  :perverted


for one day he actually had a job?......Queen Schmeen.......born into being rich and living off the country for 60years......way to go you old bitch!

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Gazza on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:42pm
Absolute bollocks.

Mick was offered about five dates to receive his knighthood and was never available as he was on tour. And besides, Prince Charles does a sizeable amount of the ceremonies these days anyway. It's no big deal.

The notion that a talent-fucked hack like Andersen has a clue what the Queen is thinking - as she never does interviews - is beyond laughable. The source of the quote - ' an anonymous royal aide'. For fuck's sake!

Based on the serialisations so far, this book has the potential to be an even bigger crock of shite than 'Old Gods Almost Dead'.

He even claimed that Jagger flew from London to Thailand for a tryst with Carla Bruni within hours of his son Gabriel being born - when he actually flew to LA two days later to attend a pre-arranged movie premiere for 'Freejack'. He did have a rendezvous with Bruni six weeks later - flying there from a media engagement in TOKYO. It's easily researched if he'd bothered to do his job properly - but hey, lets make the guy out to be as big a ratbag as you can by implying he basically abandoned his wife and child as soon as the umbilical cord was cut. No one will bother checking, eh?

The fact that this god-awful excuse for a biography is getting so much exposure this week - in some cases as much as the band's 50th anniversary - and having it's serializations taken at face value - is fucking embarrassing.

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by FPM on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:54pm

Gazza wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:42pm:
Absolute bollocks.

The fact that this god-awful excuse for a biography is getting so much exposure this week - in some cases as much as the band's 50th anniversary - and having it's serializations taken at face value - is fucking embarrassing.



Thanks for clearing that up. I didn't mean to make it look like I thought it was a credible article...since it was lumped in with the old Jagger/Bowie story, I was pretty sure it was complete crap.  Still, I DID find a funny picture to go with it, so what the hell.

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Gazza on Jul 11th, 2012 at 4:01pm

FPM wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:54pm:

Gazza wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:42pm:
Absolute bollocks.

The fact that this god-awful excuse for a biography is getting so much exposure this week - in some cases as much as the band's 50th anniversary - and having it's serializations taken at face value - is fucking embarrassing.



Thanks for clearing that up. I didn't mean to make it look like I thought it was a credible article...since it was lumped in with the old Jagger/Bowie story, I was pretty sure it was complete crap.  Still, I DID find a funny picture to go with it, so what the hell.



LOL - it was worth it for THAT photo montage!

And, of course, the 'absolute bollocks' comment was aimed at the article - not you for sharing it.

It really does look like an atrocious book on every level.

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Heart Of Stone on Jul 11th, 2012 at 4:45pm
That asshole is cashing in on the 50th anniversary, I saw him on T.V. he looks like a ass too, next thing he'll be writing a book about Mick having sex with animals!

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by AngieBlue on Jul 11th, 2012 at 5:08pm
The media vultures are descending.  

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Bingo on Jul 11th, 2012 at 9:16pm

Gazza wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:42pm:
Absolute bollocks.

Mick was offered about five dates to receive his knighthood and was never available as he was on tour. And besides, Prince Charles does a sizeable amount of the ceremonies these days anyway. It's no big deal.

The notion that a talent-fucked hack like Andersen has a clue what the Queen is thinking - as she never does interviews - is beyond laughable. The source of the quote - ' an anonymous royal aide'. For fuck's sake!

Based on the serialisations so far, this book has the potential to be an even bigger crock of shite than 'Old Gods Almost Dead'.

He even claimed that Jagger flew from London to Thailand for a tryst with Carla Bruni within hours of his son Gabriel being born - when he actually flew to LA two days later to attend a pre-arranged movie premiere for 'Freejack'. He did have a rendezvous with Bruni six weeks later - flying there from a media engagement in TOKYO. It's easily researched if he'd bothered to do his job properly - but hey, lets make the guy out to be as big a ratbag as you can by implying he basically abandoned his wife and child as soon as the umbilical cord was cut. No one will bother checking, eh?

The fact that this god-awful excuse for a biography is getting so much exposure this week - in some cases as much as the band's 50th anniversary - and having it's serializations taken at face value - is fucking embarrassing.


I am now authorized to make you an honorary New Yorker, and hand you the Golden Switchblade of Honestly Speaking. Today is Gazza Tells It Like It Is day!!  8-) :booze

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Edith Grove on Jul 12th, 2012 at 12:00pm
Here's the author talking shit: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1731240383001/fox-flash-mick-the-wild-life-and-mad-genius-of-jagger

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 13th, 2012 at 1:42pm

Edith Grove wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 12:00pm:
Here's the author talking shit: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1731240383001/fox-flash-mick-the-wild-life-and-mad-genius-of-jagger

Well he's in the right place to talk shit. Faux news. :pukey :nanker

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by sirmoonie on Jul 13th, 2012 at 9:19pm

FPM wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:54pm:
Neither Jagger nor Buckingham Palace have commented on the book.


Still, its disturbing that the Buckingham compound has neither confirmed nor denied the alleged allegations.

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by corgi37 on Jul 14th, 2012 at 12:01am
Always hated that old bitch & her in-bred clan. Apart from burning some of my relatives in a barn (ok, it was 600 or so years ago, but i dont forget), i know find out about this!!

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Bitch on Jul 14th, 2012 at 7:23pm

Gazza wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:42pm:
Absolute bollocks.

Mick was offered about five dates to receive his knighthood and was never available as he was on tour. And besides, Prince Charles does a sizeable amount of the ceremonies these days anyway. It's no big deal.

The notion that a talent-fucked hack like Andersen has a clue what the Queen is thinking - as she never does interviews - is beyond laughable. The source of the quote - ' an anonymous royal aide'. For fuck's sake!

Based on the serialisations so far, this book has the potential to be an even bigger crock of shite than 'Old Gods Almost Dead'.

He even claimed that Jagger flew from London to Thailand for a tryst with Carla Bruni within hours of his son Gabriel being born - when he actually flew to LA two days later to attend a pre-arranged movie premiere for 'Freejack'. He did have a rendezvous with Bruni six weeks later - flying there from a media engagement in TOKYO. It's easily researched if he'd bothered to do his job properly - but hey, lets make the guy out to be as big a ratbag as you can by implying he basically abandoned his wife and child as soon as the umbilical cord was cut. No one will bother checking, eh?

The fact that this god-awful excuse for a biography is getting so much exposure this week - in some cases as much as the band's 50th anniversary - and having it's serializations taken at face value - is fucking embarrassing.



Gazza I'm sure if you wrote a book about the Stones it would be factually correct, as in perfect. Have you ever considered it? I bet your book would be fabulous with all of the stories you know and all the facts you have collected over the years!

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Gazza on Jul 14th, 2012 at 8:06pm
:)

Too much of a perfectionist, Ellen. I'd never get it finished!

Besides, the sort of book I'd be interested in doing would be all nerdy stuff - info which is really hard to research without official help and access to studio logs etc. And no publisher would really be interested in it anyway.

Martin Elliott told me in Berlin a few years ago that his recording sessions books took him about 20 years!

I dont claim to know the band first-hand and wouldnt be remotely interested in the 'juicy' private stuff - which has been largely done to death anyway.

Mind you, Christopher Anderson doesnt know the band either. He doesn't seem to have any embarrassment or shameless filters, however.

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Bitch on Jul 14th, 2012 at 11:32pm
Actuslly I have always thought I would write a Rolling Stones book in my retirement years. Heres my premise: I have a SIlver Tongue Necklace which originated in Germany back in the late 60's, early 70's, originally owned by one of the road crew for The Stones. It was one of the first merchandise items made by a silversmith. This guy wore it to about 40 European concerts. Then he gave it to my friend Colin (now deceased) who lived in California and photographed the band from 75 thru early 90's. Colin wore the necklace to about 50 concerts in the US, mostly west coast & middle of the US concerts. Then he passed the Silver Tongue necklace to me, an east coast girl. I have worn the necklace to about 25 Stones concerts (and more if I count in the Stones solo gigs) mainly East Coast and London. So the Silver Tongue necklace has been to 125 Stones concerts around the world, spanning 5 deacdes. Its all true. I thought it would be a good idea to write the book from the perspective of the necklace itself, documenting the concerts it has been to and focus on the different things the wearer did while wearing the necklace. Some of it will be fact, and I can add some juicy parts to the story to make it interesting and fun. It can be really good, sort of a fiction meets fact book about three Rolling Stones fans connected by the necklace. What does anyone else think of my idea? I have a bunch of memorabelia saved to use in the book too, from the different shows The Silver Tongue has been to. I need someone to research the shows historically, someone like Gazzapedia!

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 15th, 2012 at 8:48am

Gazza wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 3:42pm:
Absolute bollocks.

Mick was offered about five dates to receive his knighthood and was never available as he was on tour. And besides, Prince Charles does a sizeable amount of the ceremonies these days anyway. It's no big deal.

The notion that a talent-fucked hack like Andersen has a clue what the Queen is thinking - as she never does interviews - is beyond laughable. The source of the quote - ' an anonymous royal aide'. For fuck's sake!

Based on the serialisations so far, this book has the potential to be an even bigger crock of shite than 'Old Gods Almost Dead'.

He even claimed that Jagger flew from London to Thailand for a tryst with Carla Bruni within hours of his son Gabriel being born - when he actually flew to LA two days later to attend a pre-arranged movie premiere for 'Freejack'. He did have a rendezvous with Bruni six weeks later - flying there from a media engagement in TOKYO. It's easily researched if he'd bothered to do his job properly - but hey, lets make the guy out to be as big a ratbag as you can by implying he basically abandoned his wife and child as soon as the umbilical cord was cut. No one will bother checking, eh?

The fact that this god-awful excuse for a biography is getting so much exposure this week - in some cases as much as the band's 50th anniversary - and having it's serializations taken at face value - is fucking embarrassing.

GAZZA, GABRIEL WAS BORN IN 1997 SO IT MUST HAVE BEEN GEORGIA'S BIRTH THAT COINCIDED WITH FREEJACK PREMIERE.

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Gazza on Jul 15th, 2012 at 11:29am
See? Thats why I'd never write a book, Bill....LOL

He has so many kids, it's a nightmare to keep track.

Georgia May it was (named as such because of where (and when) she was conceived when he was making 'Freejack')

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Gazza on Jul 15th, 2012 at 12:34pm
Seems like Andersen's really shit the bed this time - go get 'em, Mick!:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/diary/the-feral-beast-keith-lends-his-body-to-science-7944456.html


An explosive new biography of Mick Jagger, claiming he slept with dozens of famous men as well as women, has got the lawyers foaming. A Rolling Stones spokesman tells me they're planning to sue author Christopher Andersen and Simon and Schuster, who published the book in America. The book is due to be published in Britain later this month by Robson Press, a small imprint of Iain Dale's Biteback Publishing, founded only last year. "I'm not going to say who Mick has and hasn't slept with," says the spokesman, "but it's filled with plain inaccuracies. It's got Mick and Keith going to Dartford Grammar, when Keith went to Dartford Tech then Sidcup Art College." An extract released early last week told how, in 1973, Angie Bowie walked in on Jagger and David Bowie in bed together, and was so stunned the only thing she could say was: "Do you want some coffee?" But in a fuller extract yesterday, she is quoted saying: "Do you want some tea?" It's all in the details, eh?

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by Heart Of Stone on Jul 15th, 2012 at 3:14pm
Here is Angie Bowie herself being questioned on a T.V. show about the Jagger/Bowie incident on the Geraldo Rivera show, it's about Hollywood (Celebrity) spouses who got divorced.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYGXufc5k9A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzc-ro_B760

Title: Re: Why the Queen 'refused to hand Mick a knightho
Post by corgi37 on Jul 16th, 2012 at 5:44am
Cant believe Bowie was ever married to THAT!

ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.