ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash "
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1341535399

Message started by Gazza on Jul 5th, 2012 at 7:43pm

Title: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash "
Post by Gazza on Jul 5th, 2012 at 7:43pm

The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash on the 50th anniversary of their first ever gig
By BAZ BAMIGBOYE



PUBLISHED: 00:40, 6 July 2012 | UPDATED: 01:14, 6 July 2012

 
Start me up! The Rolling Stones haven’t been seen together in public for four years, but next Thursday, on the 50th anniversary — to the day — of the group’s first gig, original Stones Mick Jagger and Keith Richards and those ‘new’ lads Charlie Watts (1963) and Ronnie Wood (1975) will meet up in London to kick off their big Five‑O golden jubilee celebrations.

It’s not often they decide to spend the night together. Mick will be there with girlfriend designer L’Wren Scott, Richards with wife Patti Hansen, Charlie with wife Shirley and Ronnie will wander in with whatever girl he’s squeezin’ on the night.

They will pose on a red carpet for photographers, then stride inside to reminisce about their five decades of concerts, recording sessions, girls — and all that nefarious confectionery described in glorious detail in Keith’s sublime memoir Life.




Obstensibly, the group will be attending a gala preview for The Rolling Stones: 50 photographic exhibition at Somerset House, featuring images from the first time the band went on stage — at the Marquee Club on July 12, 1962.
Back then the line-up was Mick, Keith, Brian Jones (billed as Elmo Lewis — Elmo after his hero Elmore James and Lewis being the name he was christened with), Dick Taylor on bass, pianist Ian Stewart and Mick Avory on drums.


A couple of other old Stones will also be rolling up for the event. Bill Wyman (1962-93) will attend as a guest, as will Mick Taylor, who played with the band for five years until 1974.

‘They’re all flying in to party,’ a source close to the group told me last night. And they’ve certainly earned the right to party for as long as they want.

I remember Keith commenting a few years back that there’s no precedent for how rock and rollers behave as they age, and he’s right.

The Stones were there almost at the birth of the art form, and they’ve made (and broken) the rules for behaviour ever since.

There has been a lot of chatter about the Stones doing a gig sometime this year or next, but this has been strenuously denied by Mick and people in the band’s back office.

If you want to see what it was all about, Thames & Hudson has published a coffee table book packed with photographs linked to the exhibition.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2169490/BAZ-BAMIGBOYE-The-Rolling-Stones-stroll-town-birthday-bash-50th-anniversary-gig.html#ixzz1znZNErrZ

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by LadyJane on Jul 5th, 2012 at 7:52pm
Cannot wait for reports and pics of this great evening.
Do we even dare to think there might be a little jam???

I just got an email that my 50th Anniversary book has been shipped.
Can't get here soon enough!!!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Joey on Jul 5th, 2012 at 8:11pm
" Start me up! The Rolling Stones haven’t been seen together in public for four years, but next Thursday, on the 50th anniversary — to the day — of the group’s first gig, original Stones Mick Jagger and Keith Richards and those ‘new’ lads Charlie Watts (1963) and Ronnie Wood (1975) will meet up in London to kick off their big Five‑O golden jubilee celebrations.

They will pose on a red carpet for photographers, then stride inside to reminisce about their five decades of concerts, recording sessions, girls — and all that nefarious confectionery described in glorious detail in Keith’s sublime memoir Life. "

<  --------------- This makes Joey's  " Hog "  hang out !

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 5th, 2012 at 8:16pm
LAME. :tongui

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by mojoman on Jul 5th, 2012 at 11:11pm
book tour!!!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Heart Of Stone on Jul 6th, 2012 at 5:22am
It's looking good, their getting together!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 6th, 2012 at 9:05am
A great friend of mine is going to London next week and will be there. Try to get some pics etc.....I may hide in the luggage!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Pdog on Jul 6th, 2012 at 9:28am
a jam for the party would be nice, and very appropriate... just to show they are a band, and not some dudes who used to be in a band together!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Paranoid Android on Jul 6th, 2012 at 9:32am
A book tour would be interesting...in some ways more interesting than a concert tour...

pass the pipe please

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 6th, 2012 at 11:11am

Pdog wrote on Jul 6th, 2012 at 9:28am:
a jam for the party would be nice, and very appropriate... just to show they are a band, and not some dudes who used to be in a band together!

The chances of them jamming on that night are slim and none....and slim just left town. :wtf3

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 6th, 2012 at 12:29pm

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Jul 6th, 2012 at 11:11am:

Pdog wrote on Jul 6th, 2012 at 9:28am:
a jam for the party would be nice, and very appropriate... just to show they are a band, and not some dudes who used to be in a band together!

The chances of them jamming on that night are slim and none....and slim just left town. :wtf3

http://youtu.be/zMRrNY0pxfM

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 6th, 2012 at 2:17pm
only jamming might be LWren dunking a few hoops.......

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 6th, 2012 at 2:30pm

patioaintdry wrote on Jul 6th, 2012 at 2:18pm:
Mannish Boy now up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32YQYJuxyn0&list=UUB_Z6rBg3WW3NL4-QimhC2A&index=1&feature=plcp

spec fucking tacular!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by uncleson on Jul 6th, 2012 at 4:15pm
Cant wait to see the pics and read up about it!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Heart Of Stone on Jul 6th, 2012 at 4:55pm
Rolling Stones to Mark 50th Anniversary With London Exhibit
Somerset House will show photographic exhibition beginning July 13th
Comment
2
By Rolling Stone
July 6, 2012 1:40 PM ET

The Rolling Stones in the Sixties
John Hoppy Hopkins/Redferns

In celebration of their 50th anniversary, the Rolling Stones will attend a photographic exhibition in their honor in London on July 12th – the 50th anniversary to the day of their first gig at London's Marquee Club. The Somerset House will showcase prints and photographs ranging from concert images and studio shots to negatives and outtakes from throughout the band's history.

"This is our story of 50 fantastic years," said the band in a statement. "We started out as a blues band playing the clubs and more recently we've filled the largest stadiums in the world with the kind of show that none of us could have imagined all those years ago."

The band debuted as The Rollin' Stones on July 12, 1962. The band included  Mick Jagger (vocals), Keith Richards (guitar), Brian Jones (guitar), Ian Stewart (piano), Dick Taylor (bass) and Tony Chapman (drums.) The exhibit will open free to the public on July 13th and run until August 27th. The band recently unveiled an updated logo to mark their 50th anniversary, and they are strongly considering playing at least one live show this year to celebrate their longevity.

The party will roll on into next year. "The Stones always really considered 1963 to be 50 years, because Charlie [Watts] didn't actually join until January," Keith Richards told RS earlier this year. "We look upon 2012 as sort of the year of conception, but the birth is next year."

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/rolling-stones-mark-50th-anniversary-with-free-london-exhibit-20120706#ixzz1zskNeI1u

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gotdablouse on Jul 6th, 2012 at 8:16pm
...better than nothing I guess, but still, couldn't they do better than a picture exhibit for their 50th? Dudes are old...

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 7th, 2012 at 1:17am

Well alright then. I will take it. At least they are scheduled to be together and be seen in public together. Then maybe...who knows.. hopefully off to the studio hehe...

Anyway... good. They are going to appear together and show themselves in public together at an event. I will take it. Cool.


All that getting together behind closed doors and all their remarks like ..."not sure what we got planned but its plenty of wonderful things"... was getting stale -


It s a nice thing to see here and a credible breath of fresh air.  It'll be great to see them all together and how they act again after this long while. Thanks Indeed, Gazza



-Ian

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by corgi37 on Jul 7th, 2012 at 8:49am
Fingers crossed it doesnt end in a major brawl.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 7th, 2012 at 9:14am
It would be ironic if Mick humiliated Keith in public and 'showed him the blade'.....

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 7th, 2012 at 4:34pm

gimmekeef wrote on Jul 6th, 2012 at 9:05am:
A great friend of mine is going to London next week and will be there. Try to get some pics etc.....I may hide in the luggage!



Invitation only event, unfortunately. The public won't be anywhere near it.

I'd daresay any journalists who are there will be carefully vetted too, in case they take the easy opportunity to embarrass the band with questions about todgers.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 8th, 2012 at 9:41am

Gazza wrote on Jul 7th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

gimmekeef wrote on Jul 6th, 2012 at 9:05am:
A great friend of mine is going to London next week and will be there. Try to get some pics etc.....I may hide in the luggage!



Invitation only event, unfortunately. The public won't be anywhere near it.

I'd daresay any journalists who are there will be carefully vetted too, in case they take the easy opportunity to embarrass the band with questions about todgers.


yes..and I have friends in low places so real long shot..............only todger there will likely be Keith

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Bitch on Jul 8th, 2012 at 10:00am
Do we know anyone on the invatation list? The party should be a blast, I think it will put tnem in a celebtatory mood and break the ice. A good start IMO.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Joey on Jul 8th, 2012 at 10:07am

" ................... with questions about todgers.  "


<   ------   Does Mick really have a Tiny Todger ....... ?!




Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by BONOISLOVE on Jul 8th, 2012 at 10:45am
I am happy to report that my "todger" has sustained a regular normal size, for the few past months. Nothing scares me more than when it gets big, as if it had a life of its own. And I am like Mother Teresa, as morally clean and clear as an azure sky of deepest summer.

It scares me more when it goes the other way.



Mick?






Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by straycatuk on Jul 8th, 2012 at 11:11am
Flairville and I shall be attending (I mean loitering outside !  ) Somerset house on Thursday . Going to the Counterfeit Stones show on Wardour St. later. ............or maybe something else.  ;)

Enjoyed both Ronnie's and Mick Taylor's Bluesfest shows  :booze

3rd trip to London in 13 days

Keep the faith people. It ain't over.  :)

sc uk

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Joey on Jul 8th, 2012 at 7:15pm
" Keep the faith people.  "



<  ----- What ?   That Mick does NOT have a " Tiny Todger "   ...... ?!  ... !!!!!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by straycatuk on Jul 9th, 2012 at 3:08am
I predict he will drop his strides on Thursday and have a dick waving stand-off with Keith. I'll post the pictures.  :scary


sc uk

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 9th, 2012 at 6:09am

BONOISLOVE wrote on Jul 8th, 2012 at 10:45am:
I am happy to report that my "todger" has sustained a regular normal size, for the few past months. Nothing scares me more than when it gets big, as if it had a life of its own. And I am like Mother Teresa, as morally clean and clear as an azure sky of deepest summer.

It scares me more when it goes the other way.



Mick?



''.....and I still haven't found what I'm looking for........"

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by mojoman on Jul 9th, 2012 at 9:52am

Gazza wrote on Jul 9th, 2012 at 6:09am:

BONOISLOVE wrote on Jul 8th, 2012 at 10:45am:
I am happy to report that my "todger" has sustained a regular normal size, for the few past months. Nothing scares me more than when it gets big, as if it had a life of its own. And I am like Mother Teresa, as morally clean and clear as an azure sky of deepest summer.

It scares me more when it goes the other way.



Mick?



''.....and I still haven't found what I'm looking for........"




rim

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 9th, 2012 at 12:17pm
I feel like I'm getting ready to fall for the banana in the tailpipe.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 9th, 2012 at 3:58pm
Don't know if this has been posted yet. But,just saw it on the Stones FB page.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/rolling-stones-50-years-in-pictures-1137066

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Bitch on Jul 9th, 2012 at 4:35pm
Great news Stray Cat UK! Way to go!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Ade on Jul 10th, 2012 at 2:40am
i may well have a stroll around on the day & see what i can see...

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by PartyDoll MEG on Jul 10th, 2012 at 6:50am

Ade wrote on Jul 10th, 2012 at 2:40am:
i may well have a stroll around on the day & see what i can see...

you do have a knack for being in the right place at the right time, Ade!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 11th, 2012 at 9:15am
Getting ready for this event. What should I wear?

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 11th, 2012 at 1:19pm
we are less than 5 hours away from the 50th in London

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 11th, 2012 at 1:26pm
THE PHOTO OUTSIDE OF THE FAKE MARQUEE CLUB IS THE GAUCHEST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN..

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:01pm

BILL PERKS wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 1:26pm:
THE PHOTO OUTSIDE OF THE FAKE MARQUEE CLUB IS THE GAUCHEST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN..

lighten up PERKS...

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:10pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:01pm:

BILL PERKS wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 1:26pm:
THE PHOTO OUTSIDE OF THE FAKE MARQUEE CLUB IS THE GAUCHEST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN..

lighten up PERKS...

IIIGHT.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Steel Wheels on Jul 11th, 2012 at 2:29pm
All I'm seeing are the fucking Rolling Stones. I don't care what they are photoshopped over.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 11th, 2012 at 4:46pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 11th, 2012 at 9:15am:
Getting ready for this event. What should I wear?

Wear your birthday suit. :sad

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 11th, 2012 at 6:42pm
I can't take it...

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 11th, 2012 at 9:11pm
Its taken the 50th Anniversary to push the Joey thread down to the second half.......geeeesh we need a tour badly

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 12th, 2012 at 9:21am
Happy anniversary to greatest rock and roll band in the world. The Rolling Stones fuckers! :smilebrian :thatwassmart :wtf1 :areyoufuckingserious :smilemick :smilestu :nooslajaleisk :aimama :booze :keithpunky :willya

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by mojoman on Jul 12th, 2012 at 10:11am
HAPPY FIFTIETH!!!

Long Live the Rolling Stones!!!

:booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze :booze

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 12th, 2012 at 10:35am
HOW CAN AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION BE THIS STUPID?
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/rolling-stones-gather-at-site-of-first-gig-20120711
RETURNED TO THE SITE,INDEED.
:nanker

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Jeep on Jul 12th, 2012 at 11:05am
Fifty, the golden Jubilee !!!


Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by ijwthstd on Jul 12th, 2012 at 11:59am
I will be celebrating at Farmer's Market with a (FREE!!!) show by Ernie Watts.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 12:18pm
Flairville saw Keith at the Dorchester earlier and just met Mick outside Somerset House a few minutes ago.





Tonight's media appearance is at 7 pm, I believe.


Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by The-Worst on Jul 12th, 2012 at 12:42pm
Gazza, what time is it in London now? I'm trying to figure when we can expect to hear something from the press conference on the East Coast in the US.  I believe you are 5 hours ahead correct?

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 12:44pm

The-Worst wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 12:42pm:
Gazza, what time is it in London now? I'm trying to figure when we can expect to hear something from the press conference on the East Coast in the US.  I believe you are 5 hours ahead correct?



Yes.  ET is five hours behind the UK.  Its now 6.45 pm here

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 12:44pm
The boys are back in town :

http://www.gettyimages.fi/Search/Search.aspx?contractUrl=2&language=en-US&family=editorial&p=rolling+stones&assetType=image

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 1:04pm
http://sm-a1.yimg.com/image/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen_us%2FNews%2Fgettyimages.com%2Frolling-stones-launch-event-celebrate-20120712-101844-731.jpg&maxWidth=300&maxHeight=300&t=1342051200&ttl=129600&sig=sntHsCQ_bp4SKyCuEDj4zw--~B



Photo/Chris Jackson/Getty Images.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 12th, 2012 at 1:10pm
good stuff, this is the thread to see.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 1:23pm

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 1:35pm
.
Rolling Stones celebrate 50th, hint about tour
By Josie Cox | Reuters – 17 minutes ago.



LONDON (Reuters) - Half a century after their first live gig on London's Oxford Street, Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and the rest of the Rolling Stones marked the band's 50th anniversary by launching a new book, a photographic exhibition and hinting about a tour.

As part of the festivities guitarist Ronnie Wood told Reuters in an exclusive interview that the Stones are set to reveal their plans for future live gigs this week.




"What we do is live in hope and hopefully this week we'll unfold some plans," Wood said, adding that the band had recently spent a number of days rehearsing in a studio in New York and that getting together was like "being back at school".

Richards said this week that the Stones have met up for "a couple of rehearsals", but would not go so far as to say when the quartet comprising himself, Jagger, Charlie Watts and Wood would be performing in public again.

"We're playing around with the idea and had a couple of rehearsals - we've got together and it feels so good," Richards told Britain's publicly funded broadcaster the BBC.

The 65-year-old Wood, who joined the Stones in 1975 to replace Mick Taylor, also refused to rule out the possibility of a return appearance by Bill Wyman -- bass guitarist for the band from 1962 until 1993.

"I saw him last week and he was in top form, rocking," Wood said. "We also did a rehearsal with him a few weeks ago. It's like he'd never been away."

The exhibition of photos at London's Somerset House and the accompanying book track the rise of a group of fresh-faced British boys who played their first gig at Oxford Street's Marquee Club in 1962, became the scourge of the establishment in the 1960s, the titans of 70s music and finally the elder statesmen of rock and roll in the 21st century.

"There was no sort of master plan," Richards says on the band's official website rollingstones.com. "We were flying by the seat of our pants. That is what amazes me, that the whole thing was improvised."

The relationship at the heart of the Stones' success remains the working friendship of singer Jagger and Richards, whose long musical partnership goes back to the days when they roomed with the late guitarist and former Stones founding member Brian Jones, hustling gigs wherever they could find them.

"You have to put yourself back into that time," Jagger says on rollingstones.com. "Popular music wasn't talked about on any kind of intellectual level. There was no such term as ‘popular culture.' None of those things existed."

RIFT AND RECONCILIATION

But the Jagger/Richards partnership has also had its chillier moments.

Earlier this year, Richards apologised to Jagger for derogatory comments he made about the lead singer in his 2010 memoir "Life", which caused a rift within the band.

In comments reported by Rolling Stone magazine, the two agreed it was time to settle their differences, leaving fans keen for another world tour breathing a sigh of relief.

"I got very involved with the business side of the Stones, mainly because I felt no one else was interested, but it's plain now from the book that Keith felt excluded, which is a pity," Jagger was quoted as saying. "Time I reckon to move on."

Richards added: "Mick's right. He and I have had conversations over the last year of a kind we have not had for an extremely long time and that has been incredibly important to me."

Some industry sources had put a tour delay down to the argument, but Rolling Stone said it may be more closely linked to concerns over Richards' health.

"The quality of the guitarist's performances declined after he suffered a head injury on vacation in Fiji in April 2006, midway through the Bigger Bang tour," the magazine said.

A Bigger Bang, the Stones' last tour, played to 4.5 million people in 32 countries over two years before it finished in London in 2007.

"The Rolling Stones: 50" picture book also hit the shelves on Thursday to correspond with the golden anniversary.

The new book features 700 illustrations, 300 of them in colour and many taken from the archive of the Daily Mirror tabloid, which contains the largest newspaper collection of Rolling Stones photography.

"This is our story of 50 fantastic years," Jagger, Richards, guitarist/bass player Wood and drummer Watts said in a joint statement.

"We started out as a blues band playing the clubs and more recently we've filled the largest stadiums in the world with the kind of show that none of us could have imagined all those years ago."

The photographic autobiography, which also features words from the band, includes images taken by Philip Townsend, the photographer for the band's first ever shoot.

The 352-page hardback edition published by Thames & Hudson in Britain, will retail at 29.95 pounds.

The Stones have said they also plan to release a documentary film in November chronicling their history.

The last studio album by the group was in 2005. They have released two live albums, 'Hampton Coliseum (Live 1981)' and 'L.A. Friday (Live 1975),' so far this year.

Richards said on rollingstones.com that he is grateful for the hallowed place that he and the band have carved into the hearts of their fans and in rock history, but was still striving to improve, half a century into his career.

"If you say I'm great, thank you very much, but I know what I am. I could be better, man, you know?"

(Reporting By Josie Cox, writing by Paul Casciato, editing by Steve Addison)


Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 1:43pm
A few more photos from this evening here :


http://uk.images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;_ylt=A0PDodsUEf9PxAUAvNtNBQx.?fr=yfp-t-702&fr2=piv-news&p=rolling+stones&tab=recent

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by The-Worst on Jul 12th, 2012 at 1:58pm
Great stuff Gazza.  Weren't Wyman & Taylor supposed to show up at the exhibit as well?

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Bitch on Jul 12th, 2012 at 1:58pm
ooh I like MICK's hair long again! Cool pic of the 'boys' LOL its getting hard to call them boys at this advanced age, but I still do consider them my boys, and I love them all. Very nice!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 2:05pm

The-Worst wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 1:58pm:
Great stuff Gazza.  Weren't Wyman & Taylor supposed to show up at the exhibit as well?


They were there, apparently. Maybe they just weren't there for the photocall?

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 2:07pm
http://cache2.asset-cache.net/xc/148213608-mick-jagger-attends-the-rolling-stones-50-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548FA72B1DDD5A8A4F978BA23DD70B81D4650A717867F72979F591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/148213612-mick-jagger-attends-the-rolling-stones-50-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA54819FD10E29EE33FE9BD208B799772016AA20796043E05C1F9591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/148213607-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548FA72B1DDD5A8A4F985D2DA335754EC14075184D139133DB3591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/148213614-mick-jagger-attends-the-rolling-stones-50-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA54819FD10E29EE33FE96F2F9937D60F59EB42DB82F3B9A2396F591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/148213619-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA54819FD10E29EE33FE9E098A7138D157374626AB4509604A552591E7EC1A351FC8B


http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/148213623-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548E764A44C81CA1E6631CE8546261521D3D636C123233FC771591E7EC1A351FC8B


http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/148213163-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548EDDB24187D21095E31CE8546261521D3DE9A3A6AE24C846A591E7EC1A351FC8B


http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/148213166-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548EDDB24187D21095E39434E49C2FA2AD8EA3CC9F63BC5F6DA591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/148213162-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548EDDB24187D21095EBD208B799772016A73C010818A9E3D46591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/148213461-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA5487C90E3D3B37B6268B31F2BADEAE3DFF9BB84847F395BBEBF591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache2.asset-cache.net/xc/148213464-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA5487C90E3D3B37B62686F2F9937D60F59EB4C125F9452B2E152591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/148213472-ronnie-wood-and-mick-jagger-attend-the-rolling-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548553A5481398DD222BD208B799772016A02A252E8EA456316591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/148213609-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-mick-jagger-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548FA72B1DDD5A8A4F9E098A7138D1573744206938A2086B3F9591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache2.asset-cache.net/xc/148213613-mick-jagger-attends-the-rolling-stones-50-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA54819FD10E29EE33FE931CE8546261521D39B7C799FFC6D4ACD591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache2.asset-cache.net/xc/148213617-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA54819FD10E29EE33FE985D2DA335754EC146920EC50790131ED591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/148213644-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548C70213943377777F6F2F9937D60F59EB84F0651EC4F6E4BA591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/148213645-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548C70213943377777F899BAA153123B8B9BD5DA72AA80BA492591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/148213160-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA548EDDB24187D21095EE77E7E2E983DA77EDDA079EE2546F756591E7EC1A351FC8B

http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/148213463-charlie-watts-keith-richards-ronnie-wood-and-wireimage.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA5487C90E3D3B37B626831CE8546261521D3ABF6FDFB714EC14F591E7EC1A351FC8B


Photos by Samir Hussain/www.wireimage.co.uk

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 12th, 2012 at 2:27pm
any music being played?

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 12th, 2012 at 2:36pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 2:27pm:
any music being played?

ISNT THAT THE IDEA?
PLAY SOME MUSIC?
PHOTO OPS FOR 5 YEARS FOR CRISSAKE.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by uncleson on Jul 12th, 2012 at 3:34pm
Thanks Gazza!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 12th, 2012 at 3:34pm

BILL PERKS wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 2:36pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 2:27pm:
any music being played?

ISNT THAT THE IDEA?
PLAY SOME MUSIC?
PHOTO OPS FOR 5 YEARS FOR CRISSAKE.

I hope to hear Plundered My Soul live one day.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Tumbling Dijs on Jul 12th, 2012 at 3:48pm
Thanks Gazza, this forum sure beats The Rolling Stones Fan Club "It's Only Rock'n Roll" in bringing the latest news and the latest photos.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 12th, 2012 at 3:51pm
Is it over?

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Heart Of Stone on Jul 12th, 2012 at 3:57pm
50 Years Ago Today, the Rolling Stones Played Their First Gig
'It is quite amazing when you think about it,' Mick Jagger tells Rolling Stone


The Rolling Stones
John Hoppy Hopkins/Redferns
By Patrick Doyle
July 12, 2012 7:00 AM ET

"It is quite amazing when you think about it," Mick Jagger recently told Rolling Stone, reflecting on the 50th anniversary of the Rolling Stones first show on July 12th, 1962 at London's Marquee Jazz Club. "But it was so long ago. Some of us are still here, but it's a very different group than the one that played 50 years ago."

On that summer night in 1962, the Rollin' Stones were Jagger on vocals, guitarists Brian Jones and Keith Richards, pianist Ian Stewart and bassist Dick Taylor. The drummer is up for debate; some fans contend it was their frequent early drummer, Tony Chapman, but Richards insisted in his 2010 memoir Life that it was friend Mick Avory. The Stones got the gig when Alexis Korner's Blues Incorporated – the club's Thursday night regulars fronted by Jagger – were invited to play a BBC live broadcast. Jagger didn't take part in the broadcast, and Jones persuaded Marquee club owner Harold Pendleton to let their new group fill in. When Jones called local listings paper Jazz News to advertise the gig, the famous story goes, he was asked what the band was called. His eyes went straight to the first song on the nearby LP The Best of Muddy Waters: "Rollin' Stone."

The band borrowed money from Jagger's dad to rent equipment for the gig. In Life, Richards recalled playing songs like "Dust My Broom," "Confessin' the Blues" and "Got My Mojo Working." "You're sitting with some guys, and you're playing and you go, 'Ooh yeah!' That feeling is worth more than anything," he wrote. "There's a certain moment when you realize that you've actually left the planet for a bit and that nobody can touch you … it's flying without a license."

The band continued to play around London clubs that summer. In August, Jagger, Richards and Jones moved into a grimy second-floor apartment at 102 Edith Grove in Fulham, living amongst dirty dishes, two beds and no furniture. Soon, Charlie Watts moved in. "The Rolling Stones spent the first year of their life hanging places, stealing food and rehearsing," Richards remembered. "We were paying to be the Rolling Stones."

Today, Jagger admits feeling uneasy about celebrating the milestone. "One part of me goes, 'We're slightly cheating,'" he says. "Because it's not the same band, you know. Still the same name. It's only Keith and myself that are the same people, I think. I've tried to find out when Charlie's first gig was, and none of us can really remember and no one really knows. But it's an amazing achievement, and I think it's fantastic and you know I'm very proud of it."

Richards is less reflective. "Man, I don't count!" he says with a laugh. "The Stones always really consider '63 to be 50 years, because Charlie didn't actually join until January. So we look upon 2012 as sort of the year of conception. But the birth is next year."

On Wednesday, the Stones met at the Marquee Club to shoot an anniversary photo. And while they might look a little worse for wear and tear than they did 50 years ago, they haven't lost any cool. After more than 400 songs, over two-dozen studio albums, ten mega-tours, turmoil and countless public squabbles, they look dangerous and commanding as ever, still capable of giving crowds more satisfaction than any band 50 years their junior.

Richards says the band will discuss recording new material during their London stay, and the band is strongly considering at least one gig this year, while a tour is more likely next year. Here's hoping it all happens. As Pete Townshend told the band while inducting them in to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1989, "Guys, whatever you do, don't grow old gracefully. It wouldn't suit you."

Here is what the Stones played on that night in 1962, according to meticulous, setlist-documenting Stones fansite It's Only Rock and Roll – though the setlist differs slightly from Richards' memory of the show described in Life.

1. "Kansas City"
2. "Baby What's Wrong"
3. "Confessin' the Blues"
4. "Bright Lights, Big City"  
5. "Dust My Broom"  
6. "Down the Road Apiece"  
7. "I'm a Love You"
8. "Bad Boy"
9. "I Ain't Got You"
10. "Hush-Hush"
11. "Ride 'Em on Down"
12. "Back in the U.S.A."
13. "Kind of Lonesome"
14. "Blues Before Sunrise"
15. "Big Boss Man"
16. "Don't Stay Out All Night"
17. "Tell Me You Love Me"
18. "Happy Home"

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/50-years-ago-today-the-rolling-stones-played-their-first-gig-20120712#ixzz20RajZM5W

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 12th, 2012 at 3:59pm
Enough with the hinting about touring already. Shit or get off the pot. You've been talking about touring for 2 years now. Just fucking do it! :warhorse

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 12th, 2012 at 4:13pm
They just called me....my basement is on for Dec 16 my 60th birthday......now only another 7 million to save up!  at least Ronnie confirmed with me

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Nellcote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 4:29pm

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 3:59pm:
Enough with the hinting about touring already. Shit or get off te hpot. You've been talking about touring for 2 years now. Just fucking do it! :warhorse

What he said

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by mojoman on Jul 12th, 2012 at 6:00pm
Start it up: the 50th anniversary of the Rolling Stones' first gigFifty years ago this week, a nervous band called the Rollin' Stones played their first gig – to a bemused crowd of jazz fans. Christopher Sandford, the band's biographer, charts a revolution

See how The Guardian and The Observer covered the Stones in the course of 50 years with our interactive history


http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/jul/09/rolling-stones-first-gig-50th

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 6:29pm

Tumbling Dijs wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 3:48pm:
Thanks Gazza, this forum sure beats The Rolling Stones Fan Club "It's Only Rock'n Roll" in bringing the latest news and the latest photos.



It was like the halcyon days of 2005-07 and being on setlist duty all over again!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 6:41pm
It's Only Rock 'n Roll (But They Like It): Rolling Stones reunite to mark 50th anniversary at photo exhibition launch as they hint at tour comeback
By KIMBERLEY DADDS

PUBLISHED: 22:55, 12 July 2012 | UPDATED: 22:59, 12 July 2012

They're arguably the biggest rock band in the world.

So of course the Rolling Stones were always going to mark their 50th anniversary in style.

And that they did tonight as bandmembers Mick Jagger, Ronnie Wood, Keith Richards and Charlie Watts all reunited to celebrate the momentous occasion.


Back together! The Rolling Stones - Charlie Watts, Keith Richards, Ronnie Wood and Mick Jagger - reunited together tonight to mark their 50th anniversary

On this date five decades ago the Rolling Stones played their first ever gig.



The exhibition will open to the public from tomorrow and spans their entire career from their first gig at London's Marquee Club.



All smiles: They turned up to Somerset House in London to mark the occasion with the launch of a new photographic exhibition


Celebrations: It is 50 years ago today that the band played their first ever gig at London's Marquee Club on 12 July, 1962




In rehearsals: They revealed at the launch that they are practicing ready for some live shows together


And in true rock star style, they managed to have a turn out of musicians, rockers and writers flock to the special event.

The star line-up included the likes of Mick Hucknall, Bill Wyman and Tom Stoppard.

While they were there the band happily posed for photographs as they dressed in an array of outfits, still showing them at their iconic best.



Still going strong: Ronnie Wood and Charlie Watts dressed smartly for the anniversary date as other stars flocked to the venue


Crowd pleaser: Jagger was happy to stop for fans as he signed autographs while standing out in an electric blue suit

Lead singer Jagger, 68, stood out in a bright blue suit, while Richards opted for his trademark hat.

And he also took the opportunity to please fans by insisting that they have no plans to retire.

Richards revealed: 'All of this has sort of brought us back together, and we'll see what comes out of it.'

And he also admitted they have already started rehearsals for live shows, causing speculation they are soon set to announce a comeback tour or concert for later this year or in 2013.

But for now they've settled on just reuniting for tonight's special exhibition launch.


Like old times: The photo exhibition opens to the public at Somerset House from tomorrow (Friday, 13 July) and spans their entire music career



Rock royalty: The band welcomed guests including rockers Mick Hucknall and Bill Wyman into the venue for the celebrations

The show, which opens to the public Friday, charts the band's career from their first official photo shoot in 1963 - young mop tops lined up against a row of red phone boxes - to their monster `80s and `90s stadium tours.

Jagger mused tonight: 'You can see when you look at the photos how we couldn't give a hoot about anything. You can just sort of tell by the attitude of those photographs how we didn't care.'

The lineup for the first ever gig at the Marquee Club was vocalist Jagger, guitarists Richards and Brian Jones, bassist Dick Taylor, pianist Ian Stewart and Mick Avory on drums.

'Taylor and Avory soon left the lineup, while Stewart switched to a backup role; drummer Watts joined in 1963, with guitarist Wood completing the line-up in 1975.



Wrapping up: Playwright Tom Stoppard and Heather Kerzner were also in attendance and shielded themselves from the rain as they left

The band had its first hit, a cover of Chuck Berry's "Come On," in 1963, and soon became one of the world's biggest and most influential rock acts, rivaled only by The Beatles.

The Beatles split up in 1970, but the Stones are still going strong - something Jagger attributes in part to an early grounding in versatility.

The Stones have sold more than 200 million records, with hits including (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction, Street Fighting Man and You Can't Always Get What You Want.

But in recent years much of their income has come from touring. Their last global tour, A Bigger Bang, earned more than $500 million between 2005 and 2007.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2172801/Rolling-Stones-reunite-mark-50th-anniversary-photo-exhibition-launch-hint-tour-comeback.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 12th, 2012 at 8:01pm
This needs to be said...."Charlie please take the boys shoe shopping FFS"......

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 12th, 2012 at 8:19pm
30 seconds of video - http://www.onenewspage.com/video/20120712/987241/Rolling-Stones-could-return-to-stage-this-year.htm

Mick - "Definitely later on this year on stage..."

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Edith Grove on Jul 12th, 2012 at 8:22pm

Gazza wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 8:19pm:
30 seconds of video - http://www.onenewspage.com/video/20120712/987241/Rolling-Stones-could-return-to-stage-this-year.htm

Mick - "Definitely later on this year on stage..."


I'm holding you to it, Mick !  :whydontcha

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by corgi37 on Jul 12th, 2012 at 9:54pm
They should do a gig on the 22nd of December. Isnt that the end of the world?

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 12th, 2012 at 9:56pm

gimmekeef wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 4:13pm:
They just called me....my basement is on for Dec 16 my 60th birthday......now only another 7 million to save up!  at least Ronnie confirmed with me

Hey GK. I'm celebrating my own 50th anniversary in November. Fuck waiting for the Stones,I'm doing my own tour....Of every bar in the San Francisco Bay Area! Only a couple of thousand more to go!! :pukey

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 12th, 2012 at 10:38pm
A SIMPLE 5 SONG BLUES SET,NO MATTER LIMITED KEITH IS ,WOULD HAVE BEEN AN IMPRESSIVE WAY TO MARK THIS DAY.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by The-Worst on Jul 12th, 2012 at 11:24pm
I think some things about the past few years have been made clearer by the comments the past few days.
1)  Keith's book really strained his relationship with Mick and probably keep them far from each other for a few years.
2) Mick has stated that they aren't doing the Olympics because they didn't feel the band was ready. Personally I think this is a great sign-no one wants the Stones half assing it.
3) The fact that they didn't feel they were ready to play must mean Keiths playing is holding the band up as Charlie , Ronnie, and Mick have all played in the public recently and all sounded good.
4) Since they are all saying they will probably tour by years end I believe it's just a matter of time as the tour probably has to be booked before its announced. As soon as it is, well get an announcement!


Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 13th, 2012 at 12:05am

Gazza wrote on Jul 12th, 2012 at 8:19pm:
30 seconds of video - http://www.onenewspage.com/video/20120712/987241/Rolling-Stones-could-return-to-stage-this-year.htm

Mick - "Definitely later on this year on stage..."



___________________________________________________



So  there it is boys and girls. I as well as you heard Mick say ...."definitely".... there no need to be debating now. Now it is "Official".  That is all I wanted... a group shot of them together and some official word. Finally! Great to hear though.

*Btw ...Mick said they would do "some gigs"... he did not say a full onset tour by any stretch. My take was some /a few shows. Still great news though.


(Now all we need is some "official word" they started on a new album. .. .. and a tentative release time frame)



Ian

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 13th, 2012 at 7:30am
If Keith can no longer play what makes us think magically in a few months he will be able to.....more likely a continued decline. To publicly say no plans yesterday on the 50th would have been globally written as THE END....so we will be teased but I'm not convinced anything will come of this sadly.........

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Some Guy on Jul 13th, 2012 at 7:44am
There is a small article on Stones 50th low on Huff Po, comments are mostly positive for the most part.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by lotsajizz on Jul 13th, 2012 at 8:50am
The way Keith played after The Fall is not encouraging for any future tourage; I'd be satisfied if they could pull off a few gigs.


Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Nellcote on Jul 13th, 2012 at 9:14am

lotsajizz wrote on Jul 13th, 2012 at 8:50am:
The way Keith played after The Fall is not encouraging for any future tourage; I'd be satisfied if they could pull off a few gigs.

True dat, although the rehearsal footage with James Cotton was the best of all what was present.
Something tells me that there will be a spark left in the canon which Keith is currently enabling....

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by glen759 on Jul 13th, 2012 at 9:26am
I was there and it was good to meet up with some die hard fans and also to see the band on their 50th but it was all over in minutes and sadly they had no time to sign many autographs (only Mick fleetingly).

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Steel Wheels on Jul 13th, 2012 at 10:11am
We're looking at the Stones on the red carpet as they get ready to go inside a gallery and look at photos of themselves. Yawn!

I wish they had some instruments and gave us a tune.

I'm salivating over Mick's comment though. I need to see this powerhouse on a stage again!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by mojoman on Jul 13th, 2012 at 10:38am
online comment from the other day


VengeanceGauche
9 July 2012 11:44PM

Don't be seduced by hearsay and second hand opinions concerning Jagger, who i've retained a huge amount of affection for, and admiration over the years. Many revisionist cultural historians - especially those not around in the 60's - have been trying to diminish his importance for over forty years and none have succeed. Much as Richards has moved centre stage in the affection of fans and critics in the Stones declining years, during the 60's the Stones were very much Jagger's band and Keith really didn't get a look in until 1968. Even Brian Jones was more prominent than dear old Keith.
For a short time Jagger was the greatest rock 'n' roll front man and template for every lead singer in almost every (faux)outlaw rock band that followed. For every person that tells you Jagger has always been conservative there are a thousand others - try Nick Kent the music journalist who was closer to the Stones than most, or Grail Marcus or Robert Christgau or Stanley Booth - that will tell you that without Jagger's leadership and drive the Stones would have fallen apart after ten years if the band had to rely on Keith.
What people who weren't around in the 60's/70's forget is not only did Jagger have the leadership, he had the iconography, which is always a crucial ingredient in a great rock band and it was during that period the premier Stone - effete, androgynous, decadent - changed many peoples perceptions about what it was to be a "real man" and was the bete noire of mainstream culture, and as famously quoted became "Everybody's Lucifer," and we gals loved him as did many of the boys, and along the way he wrote some of the greatest most iconic songs in rock 'n' roll. That he wasn't Satan is immaterial, often perception is as powerful as the reality. I also suspect that what people resent about Jagger as represented by many on this thread is they feel betrayed, let down or a huge amount of generational envy or they just don't get it because they weren't around when Jagger and the boys were responsible for a seismic shift towards what the great music critic/cultural historian Robert Christgau described as "mass bohemianism," that took place on an international scale in the 60's . Much greater than any of the musical/cultural pygmies that came afterwards at the end of the 70's up to the present. I mean Ms Jagger got to have his cake and eat too. Where as dear old Keith got to live out his arrested adolescence and retain faux rebellious purity while Jagger took care of business.
The Stones were the Countercultures premier band and carried the zeitgeist of the age. With Gimme Shelter - rocks greatest song of dread - they foreshadowed they death of 60's utopian-ism - Paris 68/Grosvenor Square Riots/Mai Li Massacre/Manson Murders/Race War/Mass Civil Disturbance/Nixon/Altamont/Kent State Killings. At the height of their powers they pre-empted the coming dissolution and retreat into the decadence and cynicism of the 70's and my!! How we danced!! Not on the grave of Western Civilisation as we imagined but on our own sense of communalism.
For too short a while The Rolling Stones were sensual/sinister/iconic/politi­­­cal/ironic/camp. "This is the Stones as they ought to be remembered; emperors while they still had the clothes, hollow men before the tappers' hammer, princes of darkness before the lights came up".
The Rolling Stones Midnight Rambler Live - Forest National (Brussels, Belgium) Oct 17, 1973. - The sublime instrumental twin guitar break two minutes into Midnight Rambler, is one of the greatest in rock 'n' roll history. Complimented by Keith Richards monstrous, burn your house down rhythm guitar slashes, Mick Taylor enters serious neo-psychedelic blues - third eye - guitar territory and on this majestic, swamp voodoo, meets Brecht of a song, proves he was one of the greatest most inspired guitar players of the 60's/70's. For five short years the Stones, with Taylor proved that they truly were the greatest rock 'n' roll band in the world.
The Stones are like a spine that runs down the back of rock 'n' roll history, unimpeachable bohemian rhythm kings. They are the spirit of rock 'n' roll, its death and one of its greatest beginnings. They are to rock 'n' roll as Wilde, Muddy Waters, Beardsley, Chuck Berry, Baudelaire, Jimmy Reed, Rimbaud are to the art of a life lived.
After all these years of let downs,disappointments/flawed albums perceived betrayals - outlaw millionaires - they have become the greatest rock 'n' roll circus and most beloved jukebox in the world. And yet they still represent that old Dylan trope that "To live outside the law you must be honest".
Or as Turner says in the Cammell/Roeg masterpiece 'Performance,' "The only performance that makes it, that makes it all the way is the one that achieves madness.”
Long may they run
I too was at the Hyde Park gig as a young hippie girl art student, but let's just say the excesses of the day burnt a hole in my synaptic memory

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Heart Of Stone on Jul 13th, 2012 at 11:41am

mojoman wrote on Jul 13th, 2012 at 10:38am:
online comment from the other day


VengeanceGauche
9 July 2012 11:44PM

Don't be seduced by hearsay and second hand opinions concerning Jagger, who i've retained a huge amount of affection for, and admiration over the years. Many revisionist cultural historians - especially those not around in the 60's - have been trying to diminish his importance for over forty years and none have succeed. Much as Richards has moved centre stage in the affection of fans and critics in the Stones declining years, during the 60's the Stones were very much Jagger's band and Keith really didn't get a look in until 1968. Even Brian Jones was more prominent than dear old Keith.
For a short time Jagger was the greatest rock 'n' roll front man and template for every lead singer in almost every (faux)outlaw rock band that followed. For every person that tells you Jagger has always been conservative there are a thousand others - try Nick Kent the music journalist who was closer to the Stones than most, or Grail Marcus or Robert Christgau or Stanley Booth - that will tell you that without Jagger's leadership and drive the Stones would have fallen apart after ten years if the band had to rely on Keith.
What people who weren't around in the 60's/70's forget is not only did Jagger have the leadership, he had the iconography, which is always a crucial ingredient in a great rock band and it was during that period the premier Stone - effete, androgynous, decadent - changed many peoples perceptions about what it was to be a "real man" and was the bete noire of mainstream culture, and as famously quoted became "Everybody's Lucifer," and we gals loved him as did many of the boys, and along the way he wrote some of the greatest most iconic songs in rock 'n' roll. That he wasn't Satan is immaterial, often perception is as powerful as the reality. I also suspect that what people resent about Jagger as represented by many on this thread is they feel betrayed, let down or a huge amount of generational envy or they just don't get it because they weren't around when Jagger and the boys were responsible for a seismic shift towards what the great music critic/cultural historian Robert Christgau described as "mass bohemianism," that took place on an international scale in the 60's . Much greater than any of the musical/cultural pygmies that came afterwards at the end of the 70's up to the present. I mean Ms Jagger got to have his cake and eat too. Where as dear old Keith got to live out his arrested adolescence and retain faux rebellious purity while Jagger took care of business.
The Stones were the Countercultures premier band and carried the zeitgeist of the age. With Gimme Shelter - rocks greatest song of dread - they foreshadowed they death of 60's utopian-ism - Paris 68/Grosvenor Square Riots/Mai Li Massacre/Manson Murders/Race War/Mass Civil Disturbance/Nixon/Altamont/Kent State Killings. At the height of their powers they pre-empted the coming dissolution and retreat into the decadence and cynicism of the 70's and my!! How we danced!! Not on the grave of Western Civilisation as we imagined but on our own sense of communalism.
For too short a while The Rolling Stones were sensual/sinister/iconic/politi­­­cal/ironic/camp. "This is the Stones as they ought to be remembered; emperors while they still had the clothes, hollow men before the tappers' hammer, princes of darkness before the lights came up".
The Rolling Stones Midnight Rambler Live - Forest National (Brussels, Belgium) Oct 17, 1973. - The sublime instrumental twin guitar break two minutes into Midnight Rambler, is one of the greatest in rock 'n' roll history. Complimented by Keith Richards monstrous, burn your house down rhythm guitar slashes, Mick Taylor enters serious neo-psychedelic blues - third eye - guitar territory and on this majestic, swamp voodoo, meets Brecht of a song, proves he was one of the greatest most inspired guitar players of the 60's/70's. For five short years the Stones, with Taylor proved that they truly were the greatest rock 'n' roll band in the world.
The Stones are like a spine that runs down the back of rock 'n' roll history, unimpeachable bohemian rhythm kings. They are the spirit of rock 'n' roll, its death and one of its greatest beginnings. They are to rock 'n' roll as Wilde, Muddy Waters, Beardsley, Chuck Berry, Baudelaire, Jimmy Reed, Rimbaud are to the art of a life lived.
After all these years of let downs,disappointments/flawed albums perceived betrayals - outlaw millionaires - they have become the greatest rock 'n' roll circus and most beloved jukebox in the world. And yet they still represent that old Dylan trope that "To live outside the law you must be honest".
Or as Turner says in the Cammell/Roeg masterpiece 'Performance,' "The only performance that makes it, that makes it all the way is the one that achieves madness.”
Long may they run
I too was at the Hyde Park gig as a young hippie girl art student, but let's just say the excesses of the day burnt a hole in my synaptic memory


I liked what you wrote (at first I was thinking "How am I going read all this???) you are right on, Mick did take care of business when Keith was in his Heroin bliss, & if it wasn't for him, The Stones might not have survived.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by FPM on Jul 13th, 2012 at 11:51am

mojoman wrote on Jul 13th, 2012 at 10:38am:
online comment from the other day


VengeanceGauche
9 July 2012 11:44PM

...I too was at the Hyde Park gig as a young hippie girl art student, but let's just say the excesses of the day burnt a hole in my synaptic memory



Wait...MojoMAN was a hippie girl art student in 1969? Que?

Who actually wrote this? I think it's rather inspired.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 13th, 2012 at 1:15pm
Some fan video footage from yesterday :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlmwWxuxW2Y&feature=player_embedded#!

Thanks to John Nicholls.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by mojoman on Jul 13th, 2012 at 1:28pm

FPM wrote on Jul 13th, 2012 at 11:51am:

mojoman wrote on Jul 13th, 2012 at 10:38am:
online comment from the other day


VengeanceGauche
9 July 2012 11:44PM

...I too was at the Hyde Park gig as a young hippie girl art student, but let's just say the excesses of the day burnt a hole in my synaptic memory



Wait...MojoMAN was a hippie girl art student in 1969? Que?

Who actually wrote this? I think it's rather inspired.


it was in the comments section from the guardians website the link i provided on my previous post.
loved it and wanted to share!!!

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by philgood on Jul 13th, 2012 at 1:40pm
Anybody knows who Mick's bodyguard is ?
As much as do I love the Stones I wouldn't want to do his job just for a minute.
A Slave-Job that is.
Hey, what's doin' Slavegirl these days?  Come on baby, give us a hint.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Gazza on Jul 13th, 2012 at 6:03pm
Rolling Stones Gather in London for 50th Anniversary Exhibit
'We've been playing, not rehearsing,' says Charlie Watts



Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/rolling-stones-gather-in-london-for-50th-anniversary-exhibit-20120713#ixzz20XwI6DMH



Charlie Watts, Keith Richards, Ronnie Wood and Mick Jagger attend 'Rolling Stones: 50 - Private View' as the Rolling Stones celebrate their 50th anniversary with an exhibition at Somerset House in London.
Photo/Samir Hussain/Wireimage

By Mark Sutherland
July 13, 2012 9:40 AM ET
The Rolling Stones celebrated their 50th anniversary in style last night by reuniting for the launch of a new photo exhibition celebrating the band's career.

Last seen in public together at the Shine A Light premiere in 2008, their appearance at London's Somerset House – 50 years to the day after their first gig at London's Marquee Club on July 12th, 1962 – is expected to be just the first in a series of events over the coming months to mark the band's Golden Jubilee.

On the red carpet, drummer Charlie Watts confirmed to Rolling Stone that the band had been practicing again, although he said it had "not yet" made any concrete plans for their live return.

"We've been playing, not rehearsing," he said with a smile.


"We had a good play in New York a few weeks ago," added guitarist Ronnie Wood. "We did 50 songs in five days. It was brilliant."

Meanwhile, frontman Mick Jagger said he was pleased the band had made it through 50 years together.

"It feels really good," he said, "if a little long . . . in the tooth! It's quite surprising. It does seem a long time, but I'm really happy about it."

Later, inside the exhibition, which showcases intimate pictures from throughout the band's career, Jagger reminisced about that first show at the now defunct Marquee, which the band had "reconstructed" for a photo shoot the previous day.

"I remember it because of the trouble we had finding a rhythm section," he laughed. Dick Taylor played bass that night, with the drummer either Tony Chapman or Mick Avory, depending on whose version of history you believe. The lineup was completed by Keith Richards and Brian Jones on guitar and Ian Stewart on piano. Former bass player Bill Wyman did not come on board until later that year, with Watts joining in 1963.

Jagger also noted that the band – then billed as the Rollin' Stones – only got that first gig because Alexis Korner's band Blues Incorporated, with whom Jagger had been singing, had been called up by the BBC to do a radio session. Jagger said his disappointment at not participating in the session (after the BBC said they would only pay for six musicians rather than seven) was tempered by having his new band fill Korner's usual Marquee residency slot.

Fifty years on, the band caused rather more of a buzz as they again spent the night together in central London. Despite heavy rain, dozens of fans lined the Victoria Embankment by the side of the River Thames to catch a glimpse of the band as they arrived for the exhibition.

The Stones turned up 20 minutes later than planned in a silver people carrier and immediately posed for photos. Smiling broadly, Jagger and Richards kept Wood between them as the band linked arms for the massed ranks of paparazzi. Jagger, wearing an electric blue suit, enthusiastically took direction from the photographers, telling his bandmates to shuffle to the left for a better angle.

Photos over, the band spent only the briefest of moments on the red carpet but, once inside the exhibition, all four members took the time to look at the photos and chat with party guests, who included former Stones Wyman and Mick Taylor, Simply Red's Mick Hucknall, lyricist Sir Tim Rice, crime writer Ian Rankin and Roxy Music guitarist Phil Manzanera.

For much of the evening, Jagger and Richards held court in separate areas of the party. Richards, wearing trademark hat and shades, looked at the photos with his son Marlon, chatted with Live Aid promoter Harvey Goldsmith and at one point doffed his hat to some passing fans who spotted him through an open window. Meanwhile, Jagger chatted with his glamorous daughters Lizzie and Georgia May near an open door on the other side of the exhibition.

But despite two years of apparent feuding since a row over Richards' autobiography Life, the pair seemed as happy and relaxed in each other's company as they did in many of the vintage photos on display. At one point, Richards whispered in Jagger's ear, seemingly sharing a private joke that made both of them laugh.

Indeed, togetherness seemed to be the order of the day, with Mick also spotted embracing former bass player Wyman and chatting at length with Wood. Whether this harmony will lead to either new recordings or another tour remains to be seen, although Jagger has hinted about at least one gig this year and Stones insiders expect further discussions to be held while the band are all together in London.
Watts, however, maintained that the reunion was really just business as usual.

"We've never been apart really," he said. "It's just they live in another part of the world – well, he [Wood] doesn't, but the other two do."

The exhibition runs at Somerset House until August 27th. It coincides with the release of a photographic book, Rolling Stones 50.



Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/rolling-stones-gather-in-london-for-50th-anniversary-exhibit-20120713#ixzz20XwxS8if

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 13th, 2012 at 6:43pm

philgood wrote on Jul 13th, 2012 at 1:40pm:
Anybody knows who Mick's bodyguard is ?
As much as do I love the Stones I wouldn't want to do his job just for a minute.
A Slave-Job that is.
Hey, what's doin' Slavegirl these days?  Come on baby, give us a hint.

CLIVE HAYNES ,I BELIEVE, BEEN WITH HIM A LONG TIME.

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 13th, 2012 at 11:28pm

mojoman wrote on Jul 13th, 2012 at 10:38am:
online comment from the other day


VengeanceGauche
9 July 2012 11:44PM

Don't be seduced by hearsay and second hand opinions concerning Jagger, who i've retained a huge amount of affection for, and admiration over the years. Many revisionist cultural historians - especially those not around in the 60's - have been trying to diminish his importance for over forty years and none have succeed. Much as Richards has moved centre stage in the affection of fans and critics in the Stones declining years, during the 60's the Stones were very much Jagger's band and Keith really didn't get a look in until 1968. Even Brian Jones was more prominent than dear old Keith.
For a short time Jagger was the greatest rock 'n' roll front man and template for every lead singer in almost every (faux)outlaw rock band that followed. For every person that tells you Jagger has always been conservative there are a thousand others - try Nick Kent the music journalist who was closer to the Stones than most, or Grail Marcus or Robert Christgau or Stanley Booth - that will tell you that without Jagger's leadership and drive the Stones would have fallen apart after ten years if the band had to rely on Keith.
What people who weren't around in the 60's/70's forget is not only did Jagger have the leadership, he had the iconography, which is always a crucial ingredient in a great rock band and it was during that period the premier Stone - effete, androgynous, decadent - changed many peoples perceptions about what it was to be a "real man" and was the bete noire of mainstream culture, and as famously quoted became "Everybody's Lucifer," and we gals loved him as did many of the boys, and along the way he wrote some of the greatest most iconic songs in rock 'n' roll. That he wasn't Satan is immaterial, often perception is as powerful as the reality. I also suspect that what people resent about Jagger as represented by many on this thread is they feel betrayed, let down or a huge amount of generational envy or they just don't get it because they weren't around when Jagger and the boys were responsible for a seismic shift towards what the great music critic/cultural historian Robert Christgau described as "mass bohemianism," that took place on an international scale in the 60's . Much greater than any of the musical/cultural pygmies that came afterwards at the end of the 70's up to the present. I mean Ms Jagger got to have his cake and eat too. Where as dear old Keith got to live out his arrested adolescence and retain faux rebellious purity while Jagger took care of business.
The Stones were the Countercultures premier band and carried the zeitgeist of the age. With Gimme Shelter - rocks greatest song of dread - they foreshadowed they death of 60's utopian-ism - Paris 68/Grosvenor Square Riots/Mai Li Massacre/Manson Murders/Race War/Mass Civil Disturbance/Nixon/Altamont/Kent State Killings. At the height of their powers they pre-empted the coming dissolution and retreat into the decadence and cynicism of the 70's and my!! How we danced!! Not on the grave of Western Civilisation as we imagined but on our own sense of communalism.
For too short a while The Rolling Stones were sensual/sinister/iconic/politi­­­cal/ironic/camp. "This is the Stones as they ought to be remembered; emperors while they still had the clothes, hollow men before the tappers' hammer, princes of darkness before the lights came up".
The Rolling Stones Midnight Rambler Live - Forest National (Brussels, Belgium) Oct 17, 1973. - The sublime instrumental twin guitar break two minutes into Midnight Rambler, is one of the greatest in rock 'n' roll history. Complimented by Keith Richards monstrous, burn your house down rhythm guitar slashes, Mick Taylor enters serious neo-psychedelic blues - third eye - guitar territory and on this majestic, swamp voodoo, meets Brecht of a song, proves he was one of the greatest most inspired guitar players of the 60's/70's. For five short years the Stones, with Taylor proved that they truly were the greatest rock 'n' roll band in the world.
The Stones are like a spine that runs down the back of rock 'n' roll history, unimpeachable bohemian rhythm kings. They are the spirit of rock 'n' roll, its death and one of its greatest beginnings. They are to rock 'n' roll as Wilde, Muddy Waters, Beardsley, Chuck Berry, Baudelaire, Jimmy Reed, Rimbaud are to the art of a life lived.
After all these years of let downs,disappointments/flawed albums perceived betrayals - outlaw millionaires - they have become the greatest rock 'n' roll circus and most beloved jukebox in the world. And yet they still represent that old Dylan trope that "To live outside the law you must be honest".
Or as Turner says in the Cammell/Roeg masterpiece 'Performance,' "The only performance that makes it, that makes it all the way is the one that achieves madness.”
Long may they run
I too was at the Hyde Park gig as a young hippie girl art student, but let's just say the excesses of the day burnt a hole in my synaptic memory



_______________________________________________




Always an "intelligently written" and interestingly perceptive piece. Bravo -



Ian

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by lavendar on Jul 14th, 2012 at 9:15am
Its obvious that someone had the hindsight to "Go For It- All"
And They did,

What a wonderfull tenacious hindsight it is,

The relationships have endured due to their fusions.

Like a fine wine, you become embodied, savorying everything about it! :-? :)

Title: Re: "The Stones roll into town for a birthday bash
Post by luxury on Jul 14th, 2012 at 1:08pm
these raggedy dolls never cease to incite excitement.  Sounds like a good year to be a Stones fan.  

I see the skunks are out again, and Mick's hair stylist has finally learned how to use a curling iron.

ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.