ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1311716958

Message started by Edith Grove on Jul 26th, 2011 at 4:49pm

Title: Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
Post by Edith Grove on Jul 26th, 2011 at 4:49pm
Mick Jagger: ‘Morbid and pathetic and very close to being ugly’
By Melissa Bell

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2011/07/24/Style/Images/10000041H696648.jpg?uuid=4_SxZrY6EeCnZJEsohk2RA
The Rolling Stones are shown during rehearsal on April 8, 1964. The British band members, from left, are, Brian Jones, guitar; Bill Wyman, bass; Charlie Watts, drums; Mick Jagger, vocals; and Keith Richards, guitar. (AP)


Update: Paul Richard, the famed Style writer I held out for mockery by posting his harsh critique of the Rolling Stones below, took my jibe in stride and offered up a mea culpa for missing the band’s talent.

Tuesday marks Mick Jagger’s 68th birthday. In honor of the rubber-mouthed, hallow-eyed, gorgeous-at-68 sprightly singer, I’m turning back to the archives of the Post. Ever since I found our original review of the Beatles in 1964 — and it wasn’t a pretty one — I’ve been hoping to poke fun at our shortsighted music reviewers again.

Thanks to Mick Jagger, I’ve got the chance. And what a delicious chance it is. In 1964, the Post wrote of the Beatles: “The British have to sit through dozens of dreadful American television programs. In return, we get the Beatles. As usual, we got gypped.” Just a year and a half later an article appeared in the Post by Paul Richard entitled “Rolling Stones lacking in Beatle-like Finesse.” There is so much good in this article:


The Rolling Stones were in town yesterday but you didn’t miss anything unless you happen to be 12 years old and a girl.

The Stones are from England and they play amplified guitars and harmonicas and drums. They are not the Beatles.

The Beatles are smiley and nice and funny. The Stones are morbid and pathetic and very close to being ugly.

There are five of them. Four of them play instruments and weigh 140 pounds each. Mick Jagger, the fifth, sings and stares and dances. He was educated at the London School of Economics and weighs 146 pounds.

They’re touring the United States so that all the 12-year-old girls who have had to make do with canned voices on records and radios can dress up and comb their hair and scream at them in person.

Dressing up is very important. If you wear the right kind of boppy little hat and eye-makeup and tight pants one of the Stones may wave at you.

Mick Jagger doesn’t wave, he points. He has a lot of thick brown uncombed hair and he dances while he sings. Yesterday he wore checked bell-bottomed hip-hugger pants and danced with his microphone.

The microphone was on a long chrome-plated stand and had a round weighted base to keep it from falling over. Jagger picked it up and jumped around and turned it upside down and hugged it.

“Ah caint get no sat-is-fac-tion,” he said.

He aslo played the tambourine with his wrist and his knees and his rump.

“Ah caint get no sat-is-fac-tion,” he said.

Then he started to take off his jacket. He did it very slowly and gracefully, and then almost — but not quite — threw it into the audience.

“Eeeeeee,” said the audience.

There were a lot of policemen there too. They formed a human wall around the stage and shoved back all the girls who tried to take the place of the microphone. They held their nightsticks in their hands and shoved gently.

Suddenly, from the midst of all those girls, a young man in a red sweater jumped on stage and made a desperate grab at Jagger’s tambourine.

The police got there first. They twisted his arm and grabbed him around the neck and pushed him to the floor and then dragged him struggling and kiccking up the aisle.

Then suddenly it was over. Jagger dropped the microphone and leaped off the stage into a sea of blue and vanished. The group was here for only a one-night stand.

The Rolling Stones have made a lot of records and a lot of money. This reporter was told they were great musicians and gave great concerts. This reporter was told wrong.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/mick-jagger-morbid-and-pathetic-and-very-close-to-being-ugly/2011/07/26/gIQAtu7YaI_blog.html


Title: Re: Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
Post by Heart Of Stone on Jul 26th, 2011 at 5:27pm
Thanks EG, interesting to look back on those Beatlemania days (that's what Charlie called it) when in concert their music was just screamed at, nobody could hear it, it took to the '69 tour when people actually listened, & that screaming was a thing of the past, although there still were some screaming girls.
As for that "Ugly" thing, that's all I ever heard in the 60's from D.J's, The Rolling Uglies and so on, there was even a Toronto band that copied The Stones & called themselves The Ugly Ducklings.

Title: Re: Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
Post by andrews27 on Jul 26th, 2011 at 5:32pm
Sounds like a good show to me.

Title: Re: Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
Post by WJO on Jul 26th, 2011 at 7:53pm

Edith Grove wrote on Jul 26th, 2011 at 4:49pm:
There are five of them. Four of them play instruments and weigh 140 pounds each. Mick Jagger, the fifth, sings and stares and dances. He was educated at the London School of Economics and weighs 146 pounds.


This is so absurd. It's obvious Mick isn't the one who weighs 146 pounds - it's Keith.

Title: Re: Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
Post by Paranoid Android on Jul 26th, 2011 at 8:13pm
The microphone was on a long chrome-plated stand and had a round weighted base to keep it from falling over. Jagger picked it up and jumped around and turned it upside down and hugged it.

“Ah caint get no sat-is-fac-tion,” he said.

He aslo <<<notice spelling error>>>played the tambourine with his wrist and his knees and his rump.


I can't believe this kind of dribble was considered journalism...and I LOVE THE WASHINGTON POST!!

Anyway...I wish I were there...wonder what the venue was.
? Looks like the current DC Armory or the old Washington Colosseum...now the trash transfer station for Waste Management .

Title: Re: Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
Post by Sioux on Jul 26th, 2011 at 8:36pm
And, don't forget...they smelled so badly {because they seldom bathed} that fans had to greet them at the airport with flowers, to mask the odor.... ::) ::) :nooslajaleisk :blankfriggingstare1 :forfucksake

Title: Re: Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
Post by Edith Grove on Jul 26th, 2011 at 8:41pm

Sioux wrote on Jul 26th, 2011 at 8:36pm:
And, don't forget...they smelled so badly {because they seldom bathed} that fans had to greet them at the airport with flowers, to mask the odor....



Not this guy >>>  :smilebrian

He even washed his goldy locks twice daily!

Title: Re: Stones: "Morbid, Pathetic & Ugly"
Post by Sioux on Jul 26th, 2011 at 8:50pm
I know! That's the crazy thing about it....Brian was probably cleaner than any doctor, judge, banker, or accountant in Britain...the media really had a hand in the "dirty" Stones rumors..

ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.