ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board

ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1287433297 Message started by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 18^th, 2010 at 3:21pm

Title: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 18^th, 2010 at 3:21pm

Lefty Joey "Jim" Jagger?

Pictures sent by anonymously by John the English captain

Title: Re: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by Factory Girl on Oct 19^th, 2010 at 5:23pm

Is his music any good? I don't like the tatoos, they don't suit him.

FG!

Title: Re: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by texile on Oct 19^th, 2010 at 6:21pm

Tattoos are probably fake. This from the NY Daily News: Ouch!

His last name may be Jagger, but his band doesn't rock. James Jagger, 25-year-old son of Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall, didn't exactly set Williamsburg on fire when his band, Turbogeist, played Bruar Falls on Grand St. Wednesday night. A source at the show that drew about 80 other hipsters tells us that although James looks like his famous father, his band "wasn't very good."

They weren't very lucky either:

Turbogeist had to cut its gig short when the drummer's bass pedal broke. Mick wasn't there to witness the debacle - perhaps because, as James' sister Georgia told a Brit mag recently, "My dad hasn't seen Turbogeist play yet. … James is always telling our parents that they can't come." Perhaps James should stick to acting, where he's had better fortune.

You can YouTube the band and ....if you dare. Its kind of pseudo punk.

Title: Re: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by Holden on Oct 19^th, 2010 at 7:12pm

texile wrote on Oct 19^th, 2010 at 6:21pm:

You can YouTube the band and ....if you dare. Its kind of pseudo punk.

They're not a good band. I really wanna like 'em because it's Jagger and all but they downright suck. :(

Title: Re: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by Factory Girl on Oct 19^th, 2010 at 7:30pm

Well then, James shouldn't embarass his family, and try something else. And, nix the tats.

Title: Re: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by Bitch on Oct 19^th, 2010 at 10:25pm

OK maybe the band really sucks and his tatts are ugly looking, but can Jim sing? Did he inherit any talent from MICK?

Title: Re: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by dadrob on Oct 20^th, 2010 at 3:51pm

one would think he could afford or have access to better gear. that is a shambles

Title: Re: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by texile on Oct 21^st, 2010 at 4:11pm

dadrob wrote on Oct 20^th, 2010 at 3:51pm:

one would think he could afford or have access to better gear. that is a shambles

Hey, I lived in those black acid-washed levis in high school. ANd still I couldn't be cool. Now, I'm realizing why. Shambles indeed.

Title: Re: "Jim" Jagger with his band some days ago
Post by gorda on Oct 22^nd, 2010 at 2:25am

He's drop-dead gorgeous! He doesn't have blue eyes, but I'd bonk him!