| ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board | |
|
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> Stones vs. George Bush http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1274035545 Message started by parachuteman on May 16th, 2010 at 1:45pm |
|
|
Title: Stones vs. George Bush Post by parachuteman on May 16th, 2010 at 1:45pm
Legends of the Stones
Posted 5/15/2010 12:00:00 PM Over the course of five decades, a lot can happen to you. When you're a member of the world's greatest rock & roll band, multiply "a lot" by a factor of a thousand. The Rolling Stones have produced hit songs and albums that have helped define rock and roll for a half-century. Along the way, they've lived a life of rock excess that few could aspire to. Think about the stories you've heard about the Stones at one time or another. Keith's Toronto drug bust. Mick sleeping with David Bowie. Charlie punching out Mick for calling him "his drummer". Ron Wood leaving his wife for a barely-legal Russian cocktail waitress. Keith's other drug bust (in 1960s England), where Mick's then-galpal Marianne Faithfull was found by police wearing only a fur rug. Oh, and Keith falling out of a lot of stuff. Can't forget that. Yep, there are a lot of stories out there. Even so, there's one tale that sums up the Stones, and specifically Mick Jagger, perfectly. It was early 2006. Then-President of the United States George W. Bush had authorized his people to secure rooms at Vienna's five-star Imperial Hotel in anticipation of a summit meeting in Austria. Specifically, the President's aides were hoping to secure the luxurious Royal Suite, where past presidents like Ronald Reagan, John F. Kennedy and George Bush Senior had stayed at a cost of $5400 a night (the room looks like this: http://www.aluxurytravelblog.com/images/suites/hotelimperialroyalsuite1.jpg) There was just one problem: The Stones were in town for a gig at the same time. They had already booked it. Presidential aides being what they are, the assumption was made that the Rolling Stones would allow the "leader of the free world" to have the suite instead. Mick, being Mick, would have no part of it. In fact, he made sure that the Rolling Stones secured every room on the entire floor. Just because. President Bush, and his people, had to find somewhere else to stay. What's it mean to be a Rolling Stone? Doing whatever you want & taking crap from no one. Jason Ward is a Toronto-based writer and on-air host on Classic Rock Q107, heard on Q Saturday Afternoons from 12 to 6 and Psychedelic Psunday Evenings from 6 to 9, and is easily followed via Facebook or Twitter. WTF?! with Jason Ward is updated every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Paranoid Android on May 16th, 2010 at 1:52pm
During Bush' first year as prez....while the annual appropriation budgets were being handed out ( a huge day on the Hill),
Bush had "You Can't Always Get What You Want" playing...what a tool!!! TRUE STORY!!! |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Pdog on May 16th, 2010 at 3:36pm
Will Riffy be posting in this thread?
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Starbuck on May 16th, 2010 at 3:50pm Pdog wrote on May 16th, 2010 at 3:36pm:
i'm holding out for moonpiddle. |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Pdog on May 16th, 2010 at 3:55pm
onnie has returned, for Stones... just saying, his priorities are in the right place.
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by gimmekeef on May 16th, 2010 at 3:56pm
Mick is the president of the Free World.......Keith is Cultural Ambassador.... Charlie Secretary of State...and this is old news aint it?........
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Pdog on May 16th, 2010 at 4:11pm gimmekeef wrote on May 16th, 2010 at 3:56pm:
very old... bush isn't prez anymore.... |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Some Guy on May 16th, 2010 at 6:50pm
This thread will be massive
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Joey on May 16th, 2010 at 7:17pm " Presidential aides being what they are, the assumption was made that the Rolling Stones would allow the "leader of the free world" to have the suite instead. Mick, being Mick, would have no part of it. In fact, he made sure that the Rolling Stones secured every room on the entire floor. Just because. President Bush, and his people, had to find somewhere else to stay. What's it mean to be a Rolling Stone? Doing whatever you want & taking crap from no one. " Oh , this is BEAUTIFUL !!!!!!!! Joe Sea .... Scroll |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Some Guy on May 16th, 2010 at 7:21pm
Best Obama ever
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by MrPleasant on May 17th, 2010 at 12:04pm parachuteman wrote on May 16th, 2010 at 1:45pm:
Hahahahahaha. WHAT AN ASSHOLE!!! |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by StPeteStone on May 17th, 2010 at 1:32pm
Sounded like bullshit when I read it 4 years ago. :interestingstuffronnie
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Riffhard on May 17th, 2010 at 2:01pm MrPleasant wrote on May 17th, 2010 at 12:04pm:
LOL! Yeah, and the guy that sits in the Oval Office now is roughly one billion times the asshole that Bush ever was. Obummer is a fucking joke. Riffy |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Some Guy on May 17th, 2010 at 3:24pm
Bush is responsible for the current oil gusher 1 mile below the ocean surface, that mankind may be unable to stop.
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Edith Grove on May 17th, 2010 at 4:01pm Is that "Rhoda" from the Mary Tyler Moore show on the right? [smiley=grin.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Joey on May 17th, 2010 at 5:37pm " Is that "Rhoda" from the Mary Tyler Moore show on the right? " !!!! |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Brainbell Jangler on May 17th, 2010 at 6:00pm Riffhard wrote on May 17th, 2010 at 2:01pm:
1. Bob Dylan "ain't no leftist." 2. Dylan endorsed Obama (his first presidential endorsement). 3. ERGO, Obama is not a leftist. Riffy's head explodes in . . . 3 . . . 2 . . . 1 |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by corgi37 on May 19th, 2010 at 6:33am
Well, good on the Stones for sticking it to da man. But i dont like that room at all. Too cluttered.
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by AngieBlue on May 19th, 2010 at 7:05am
Love that story! ;D
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Some Guy on May 19th, 2010 at 8:24am
looking at the election results on CNN, did Riffy say it was coming hard or fast?
|
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Joey on May 19th, 2010 at 10:12am
" it was coming hard or fast ? "
**** PREJEAN APPROVED !!!!! ********* !!!!!! !!!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on May 20th, 2010 at 1:43pm Joey wrote on May 19th, 2010 at 10:12am:
Joey is it true Prejean has a sex tape out where she does three guys at once, i heard she's airtight if you catch my drift |
|
Title: Re: Stones vs. George Bush Post by Joey on May 20th, 2010 at 6:34pm
" ..... true Prejean has a sex tape out where she does three guys at once, i heard she's airtight if you catch my drift "
!!!! |
|
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |