| ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board | |
|
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick... http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1272392409 Message started by moy on Apr 27th, 2010 at 1:20pm |
|
|
Title: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick... Post by moy on Apr 27th, 2010 at 1:20pm
:aimama
Ex Says Mick Jagger Isn't Packing Much Below The Belt Posted by Mitch Michaels on 04.27.2010 http://www.411mania.com Janice Dickinson speaks... Janice Dickinson - Mick Jagger's ex-girlfriend and the self-proclaimed first supermodel - was on Howard Stern's show the other day. Janice and Mick had a bitter break-up in the 80's and it seems like she still harbors some bad feelings. "He's a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick. It is very little," Janice said. "I will scorn him for the rest of my life". This isn't the first time rumors of Mick not measuring up has surfaced. Jagger was none too happy several years ago, when Stones guitarist Keith Richards said of him, "Huge balls, small cock." |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Heart Of Stone on Apr 27th, 2010 at 1:25pm
This will be a big disappointment for the ladies, & probably some men too who are gay.
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by nankerphelge on Apr 27th, 2010 at 2:20pm
Who cares what the skank says.
Sour grapes probably. Besides, Mick still got more ass than a toilet seat. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Ginda on Apr 27th, 2010 at 3:05pm
The old sperm burp sounds off again.
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by texile on Apr 27th, 2010 at 3:09pm
Well, Marianne always claimed Keith was the better lover and then Keith confirmed it.
What earth-shattering revelations! Who gives a shit. I doubt Mick gives a shit, because like you said, Nanker, Jagger "still got more ass" |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by SoulPlunderer on Apr 27th, 2010 at 3:44pm
There is one thing that Mick does have the Janice doesn't and never will, actual fuckin talent!!!
And with all her bloody plastic surgey, Mick looks better and all! She's probably just bitter cause he's more successful than her and jealous that he's skinnier. I mean, she has to name-drop him just to get some cheap attention but she's done this before on numerous TV shows. No one gave a shit then, and no one gives a shit now, especially not Mick!!!! |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by LadyJane on Apr 27th, 2010 at 4:22pm
I will make the supreme sacrifice for the sake of my fellow RO'ers and get to the bottom of this myself.
I know. I know. I am a selfless woman. This one is for the RO team!!! :perverted LJ. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Holden on Apr 27th, 2010 at 4:44pm
Woah! I had no idea they dated!
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Factory Girl on Apr 27th, 2010 at 4:50pm
Janice is just riding Jagger's horse...just like all the other trollops.
I remember reading Janice discussing her male ethnic preferences...and it ain't Jagger or Richards. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by AngieBlue on Apr 27th, 2010 at 5:13pm
No matter the size the man must know what to do with it.
And do it well enough... :perverted |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Factory Girl on Apr 27th, 2010 at 5:21pm AngieBlue wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 5:13pm:
Jagger is well qualified to teach mere mortals about it....The Art of Sex...Professor M.P. Jagger...sign me up ;) |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Gazza on Apr 27th, 2010 at 6:24pm
Must be all of three months since she last went on about it. The expression 'attention whore' was made with her in mind.
There are few people on the planet as annoying, tedious and tacky as that pathetic cum dumpster. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Boomy on Apr 27th, 2010 at 6:30pm
Two comments about Janice and sperm/cum/jizz? Does she have some sort of reputation (other than being a bitch--and a fugly, skanky one at that)?
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by texile on Apr 27th, 2010 at 6:31pm Gazza wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 6:24pm:
No shit. I used to think she was funny. Her book was actually funny, but enough already.....Why is this news anyway? I have never understood the compulsion some people feel to not shut the fuck up! |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Brainbell Jangler on Apr 27th, 2010 at 6:34pm
Look at the photo. Skary Skank would make anyone's dick shrink.
:perverted |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Pdog on Apr 27th, 2010 at 7:03pm
Wasn't there pics of Mick's dick around before....?
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Edith Grove on Apr 27th, 2010 at 7:05pm Pdog wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 7:03pm:
Stills from Performance, I think. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by GotToRollMe on Apr 27th, 2010 at 7:10pm Ginda wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 3:05pm:
LMAO |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Bitch on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:27pm
She's a lying piece of shit! A stupid ass dumb fvcking whore!
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Gazza on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:36pm Boomy wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 6:30pm:
Yeah. She's had more pricks in her than a second hand dartboard. I dont know about you, but the sort of woman who feels the need to tell the world every sordid intimate detail of her sex life absolutely makes my flesh crawl. In fact, every time I see a picture of her mug I feel the need to scratch myself. The last time I saw a mouth like that, there was a hook in it. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Kilroy on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:59pm
I think I was told once, it's not the size of Dog in The Fight but The Size Of the Fight In the Dog.....Or Something Like That :blankfriggingstare1
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by tumbledsomebody on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:15pm Kilroy wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:59pm:
That was Mark Twain that told you that... |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Boomy on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:15pm Bitch wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:27pm:
Yeah! Yeah! Right the fuck on! Preach on, Bitch! :) :) :) |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Boomy on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:18pm Gazza wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:36pm:
A guy shouldn't do it regarding a woman, either. It's childish (in the vein of "he smells"...something kids do). Janice Dickinson is cuckoo for Coco Puffs. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Kilroy on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:26pm Tumbled wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:15pm:
Oh I thought it was Samuel Clemens! :blankfriggingstare1 |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:33pm Pdog wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 7:03pm:
WARNING EXPLICIT CONTENT I WARNED YOU CLICK ONLY IF YOU AGREE THAT THIS IS A NASTY, DISGUSTING AND BAD TASTE IMAGE lick here... Do NOT complain... you were warned |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:40pm
ahhh.... BTW
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Brainbell Jangler on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:50pm Bitch wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:27pm:
Anyone can stick a microphone in their pants. Was Keith lying, too? |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by buddhabone on Apr 27th, 2010 at 10:20pm
This thread is a HOOT!!!!
Jagger may have a small cock. I don't care. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by buddhabone on Apr 27th, 2010 at 10:23pm
...Another thing.
How did Keith confirm the size of Mick's shidoobi? |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Bitch on Apr 28th, 2010 at 6:26am Brainbell Jangler wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:50pm:
YES, KEEF was jealous and that is NOT a microphone in MICK's pants and MICK has a large beautiful dick! I know it for a fact! ;D |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Apr 28th, 2010 at 6:34am Bitch wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:27pm:
:blankfriggingstare1 :aimama ...BTW, that "thing" is fake |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Gazza on Apr 28th, 2010 at 6:43am Boomy wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 9:18pm:
Absolutely agree. Although (and this is a back-handed compliment I suppose), I just expect women to have higher standards regarding that kind of thing. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Gazza on Apr 28th, 2010 at 6:47am buddhabone wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 10:23pm:
I think he noticed just before the last tour that Mick had a visible hard-on when Cohl told him the amount of money he stood to make.... |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 28th, 2010 at 8:56am LadyJane wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 4:22pm:
You mean your going to sleep with Janice Dickinson. :spooky |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by polytoxic on Apr 28th, 2010 at 12:54pm Gazza wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 8:36pm:
;D ;D ;D She fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Gazza on Apr 28th, 2010 at 1:01pm
In fairness, when she was younger, she was pretty hot.
She's ended up with the mug her classlessness deserves though. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Honky Tonk Man on Apr 28th, 2010 at 1:09pm
Ah, come on, Bitch! That is a microphone!
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by SweetVirginia on Apr 28th, 2010 at 1:17pm
Much as I'd like to think otherwise....that IS a microphone. :(
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by texile on Apr 28th, 2010 at 2:53pm Honky Tonk Man wrote on Apr 28th, 2010 at 1:09pm:
Yes, only partially a mic... I remember very clearly, sitting in front of the tv in my parents room while a church gathering unfolded in the living room, the bulge that presented itself to my pubescent eyes during the Stones 78 SNL performance. I was worried someone would walk in the room because I was just staring at that bulge. Anybody have a clip? It was eye-opening. Probably the first bulge i had ever seen. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by texile on Apr 28th, 2010 at 2:59pm
As for Keith,
Doesn't anybody remember that clip in CS Blues where Mick and Keith are backstage, with Mick changing into his stage clothes and he's in his athletic supporter......and Keith, taking a swig of JD, eyes his package....? It's obvious. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Brainbell Jangler on Apr 28th, 2010 at 3:26pm buddhabone wrote on Apr 27th, 2010 at 10:23pm:
I'm guessing he saw it at Edith Grove. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Brainbell Jangler on Apr 28th, 2010 at 3:28pm Bitch wrote on Apr 28th, 2010 at 6:26am:
Did you take photos when you saw Mick's wang? |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by tumbledsomebody on Apr 28th, 2010 at 3:50pm
Here's another Class Act
http://www.accesshollywood.com/courtney-love-talks-sex-drugs-and-losing-her-rock-and-roll-money_article_31626 Howard Stern seems to bring out this kind of stupidity. Maybe Janice got an STD?? how come all the guys want to see Mick's dick all of a sudden |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Ginda on Apr 28th, 2010 at 4:26pm Tumbled wrote on Apr 28th, 2010 at 3:50pm:
Agree with all of the above. Howard Stern THRIVES on this stupidity. And as for your last question...I'll take my answer off the air. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Bitch on Apr 28th, 2010 at 7:52pm So is this a microphone too? Shattering my illusions of love. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by texile on Apr 28th, 2010 at 8:20pm
I'm with you Bitch, it ain't all an illusion, the man has to have something going on down there....
Some spiteful woman and jealous men might downgrade if it ain't a ten..... so complaints are just petty grievances.. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by SweetVirginia on Apr 28th, 2010 at 8:51pm
Mick will check it out for us:
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by GotToRollMe on Apr 28th, 2010 at 8:52pm SweetVirginia wrote on Apr 28th, 2010 at 1:17pm:
Looks more like a can of hairspray or somethin'. Mick's one of those guys with a huge pair of balls and an average-sized cock. Nothin' wrong with that. Variety is the spice of life, after all, and size means absolutely nothing. Technique is another matter entirely... ;) |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by GotToRollMe on Apr 28th, 2010 at 9:03pm SweetVirginia wrote on Apr 28th, 2010 at 8:51pm:
"...She said she liked the way I held the microphone..." |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by SweetVirginia on Apr 28th, 2010 at 9:20pm
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 28th, 2010 at 9:28pm
Decide for yourself. http://www.iorr.org/talk/read.php?1,646664,647355#msg-647355
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Gazza on Apr 29th, 2010 at 6:30am Tumbled wrote on Apr 28th, 2010 at 3:50pm:
They do? Where? You must be reading a different thread to me... |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Bitch on Apr 29th, 2010 at 6:41am
SV thanks for posting MICK in the orange pants and I still hold my opinion that is NOT a micrphone! I can see the outline of MICK's head and the shaft is slightly curved! MICK's bulge is one topic I can discuss for eternity! There are some old pics of MICK in a navy blue sparkly jumpsuit, which need to be posted on this thread! :P
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by SweetVirginia on Apr 29th, 2010 at 6:59am
I KNEW you would like that picture, Bitch.
I'll see what else I can find for you in my vaults. :) |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:13am Bitch wrote on Apr 29th, 2010 at 6:41am:
So your saying Mick is a peachy kind of guy. His eyes are hazel and his dick is slightly curved. :perverted |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by mojoman on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:20am sweetcharmedlife wrote on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:13am:
thats a little ghey |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by tumbledsomebody on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:21am
This is all very funny. I think Mick is doing pretty well if at approaching age 70 people are still talking about his crotch.
Well done! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1269750/Scribbled-piece-paper-40-years-ago-John-Lennons-lyrics-A-Day-In-The-Life-fetch-500-000.html article-0-095A7BC8000005DC-860_468x645.jpg (Attachment deleted) |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by AngieBlue on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:25am Tumbled wrote on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:21am:
Good point. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:29am mojoman wrote on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:20am:
Maybe your right....We need Joey to put up a Carrie Prejean pic ASAP! :thatwassmart |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by SweetVirginia on Apr 29th, 2010 at 10:02am
This extensive discussion about Mick's penis is more proof that we need a freaking tour announcement.
We really need something concrete to discuss! :blankfriggingstare1 Maybe the new Exile songs will give us a more music-oriented discussion once we hear them in their entirety. |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Gazza on Apr 29th, 2010 at 10:18am SweetVirginia wrote on Apr 29th, 2010 at 10:02am:
Yep..there's too much meat in this thread, and no concrete..... ;D |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by SweetVirginia on Apr 29th, 2010 at 10:18am
RIM
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by Bitch on Apr 30th, 2010 at 8:57am sweetcharmedlife wrote on Apr 29th, 2010 at 9:13am:
Well actually the curved ones are the BEST! Speaking from experience, haha! |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by SweetVirginia on Apr 30th, 2010 at 11:48am
I love you, Bitch. You are a RO original. :)
|
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by lavendar on Apr 30th, 2010 at 12:00pm
Approaching...
And everyone would like 1 time in the hay with him... What a SENSOUS SEXUAL Musical Singin Machine. SING TO ME BABE. ALL night long.... |
|
Title: Re: ...a nasty little Sir Mick, with a little dick Post by PartyDoll MEG on May 1st, 2010 at 7:15am
I go away for a week of vacation and the only thing i missed was a thread on Mick's equipment?
I am shattered... oh and thanks, Gazza for using another great description...."cum dumpster". Truly, RO is an educational experience. My vocabulary has increased by leaps and bounds.. ;D ;D |
|
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |