Post by PartyDoll MEG on Apr 8th, 2010 at 7:40pm
duh?
where is it safe?
Voodoo....
you ok?
where is it safe?
Voodoo....
you ok?
| ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board | |
|
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on.." http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1270768475 Message started by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Apr 8th, 2010 at 6:14pm |
|
|
Title: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on.." Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Apr 8th, 2010 at 6:14pm
Yes, it ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on the Political thread Now!" Now!!!
:aimama :thatwassmart :whatapostronnie :wtf1 :kissmyass |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go to the "It's safe to go on Post by Some Guy on Apr 8th, 2010 at 6:48pm
what are we doing here?
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by PartyDoll MEG on Apr 8th, 2010 at 7:40pm
duh?
where is it safe? Voodoo.... you ok? |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by MrPleasant on Apr 8th, 2010 at 8:25pm What's happening? |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by left shoe shuffle on Apr 8th, 2010 at 8:35pm A thread about a thread about a thread... :wtf3 |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Ginda on Apr 8th, 2010 at 8:40pm
http://media.npr.org/programs/atc/features/2008/july/psycho/perkins_200.jpg?t=1248630686 It's very safe. Care to spend the night?
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by left shoe shuffle on Apr 8th, 2010 at 8:45pm |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Ginda on Apr 8th, 2010 at 8:51pm But of course, Dr Szell. Mother insists...and she wouldn't hurt a fly. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 8th, 2010 at 9:46pm
A thread about nothing?....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjDnGBrhhaQ
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Irina on Apr 9th, 2010 at 5:56am |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 9th, 2010 at 9:02am
when assasin kill assasin who kill assasins...
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by buddhabone on Apr 12th, 2010 at 11:31pm
This sounds like a thread about nothing that's pretending to be harmless.
It isn't. Where's Winston Legthigh? He'd have an answer. Raoul Duke may be on the case. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 13th, 2010 at 9:55am
i'm just going to post wearing a full body condom... any sexy ladies want to hit me up and do some political cyber fighting, I'm PC virus, spyware and malware free....
your pic get my my long winded rant about how Tiger Woods should be jailed for attacking Roy of Siegfried and Roy and how syntheziers are encoraging teen sex. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 13th, 2010 at 10:53am
" ... any sexy ladies want to hit me up and do some political cyber fighting, I'm PC virus, spyware and malware free....
your pic get my my long winded rant about how Tiger Woods should be jailed for attacking Roy of Siegfried and Roy and how syntheziers are encoraging teen sex " !!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Jesus Christ on Apr 14th, 2010 at 2:00pm
Hey, we might as well get THIS thread locked as well...
I'm sorry you misunderstood our comments, Mr. Riffhard. Nobody said your copyright-infringing t-shirt pissed anyone off. In fact, everyone said they think you're a dick for wearing it. Right before you got the thread locked by breaking most of the rules for posting on RO. BUT! At least there's Stones content in your post! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Some Guy on Apr 14th, 2010 at 2:09pm
funny
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Some Guy on Apr 14th, 2010 at 2:42pm Joey wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 2:40pm:
Riffy, did you win? |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Riffhard on Apr 14th, 2010 at 3:46pm Some Guy wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 2:42pm:
YES! Big win today! I want to thank the team and the crew, Plus I'd be remiss if I didn't thank all the fans. But most importantly I'd like to thank the haters, and the backwoodsmen of Harrisburg, Pa. who through loads of hard work and an enormous amount of wasted bandwidth have proven to all that it it is they that are the biggest losers of all! Just remember kids, a win for Riffy is a win for America! Riffy |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 14th, 2010 at 4:31pm
Riffy whats your problem man, we were asked to stop, you keep trolling and attacking... is it your intent to not only get threads locked, but also turn away new posters, b/c you want to be right about something....
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Some Guy on Apr 14th, 2010 at 4:36pm Riffhard wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 3:46pm:
I meant at roulette..... |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Brainbell Jangler on Apr 14th, 2010 at 4:36pm
Riffy got tired of having his ass handed to him, so he got the politics thread locked. BTW, howe about that 11,000 Dow? Or the biggest meeting of world leaders in America since the founding of the UN? Ukraine giving up its nukes? Mt. Rushmore, here we come!
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Some Guy on Apr 14th, 2010 at 4:36pm Brainbell Jangler wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 4:36pm:
3 dollar bill yo |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Ginda on Apr 14th, 2010 at 4:47pm Brainbell Jangler wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 4:36pm:
I don't think Riffy's post was the straw that broke the Gazza's back, BJ. Although he (and many others) had crossed the line he was not the last to do so before the whip came down...I suspect one post in particular led to some emails of protest. In an attempt to keep things light I submit the following - I don't take Lipitor but I did purchase a pair of Skechers Shape Up sneakers today. According to the brochure they will cure anything that ails you. I feel like I have a rocking chair on each foot. I also believe I was cheated at the store (Famous Footwear) and will be crafting a letter of complaint once I hit the send button for this post. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Brainbell Jangler on Apr 14th, 2010 at 4:49pm
Hey Riffy,
Next time you're getting loaded with Mick at the roulette table, why don't you ask him what he thinks of that copyright-infringing t-shirt you were showing off on that other thread you got locked? Or better yet, howe about asking his lawyers? :willya |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by nankerphelge on Apr 14th, 2010 at 5:40pm
The Stones lawyers might tell the Stones that it would be a tough case because (1) even if a logo is properly the subject of federal copyright law, fair use as satire might apply under First Amendment grounds or that (2) if the logo is subject to trademark protection, there is probably no likelihood of confusion as to the source of the goods since all you libs seem to understand this isn't a "real" Stones shirt and (3) given the Stones unclean hands in lifting celebrity images (original Some Girls cover) or names & events (Claudine was scuttled) and in some cases the better part of songs (Love in Vain/Stop Breakin Down), maybe it is no big deal, except to a few smarty pants libs who agree with Freedom of Speech as long as it is the "correct" speech!
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 14th, 2010 at 8:10pm nankerphelge wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 5:40pm:
all that said.... it's a friggin anti-war song... written by two liberals... all that shirt does is identify the wearer, like an Ed Hardy tee or those Affliction shirts... There's no cool irony, in that shirt... the irony for me, sadly, is after all people who were uptight over religion, yet this is a far worse desecration... I consider rock n' roll my religion... it is just pathetic that Riffy feels he has to keep stirring the pot...all this copyright law talk is stupid. Imagine what Mick or Kieth would think of the person wearing that shirt... |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by LadyJane on Apr 14th, 2010 at 8:19pm
Mick and Keith would think "cha-Ching" $$$$$$.
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Starbuck on Apr 14th, 2010 at 9:11pm Pdog wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 8:10pm:
huh?? that was tongue in cheek, right? |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by PartyDoll MEG on Apr 14th, 2010 at 9:39pm
How long before you doofuses ( or is it doofi, JC?) get this thread locked?
This is getting old..really old... as old as Joey's ladyfriend in the coffin (damn, I can't find her photo..) |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by 2000monkey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 1:03am Starbuck wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 9:11pm:
The appropriation of the Stones' trademarked lips is certainly vulgar and clueless. What's next? Maybe the Tea Party cult will adopt Street Fighting Man as their mantra at their next collective hissy fit. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by leonid on Apr 15th, 2010 at 1:55am Riffhard wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 3:46pm:
Sooooo, you basically just admitted you were trolling. Glad you have come to terms with that. Not to mention your endless flaming and name calling. And since you are always going on and on about FACTS, here's one for you: You break the user agreement of this board in almost every single post you make, and you've been doing it for years. Any other board would have banned you a long time ago. Not that I would ever want you banned though, you're a constant source of humor. :areyoufuckingserious |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:45am LadyJane wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 8:19pm:
Except they would swing liberal. I do own a Stones Che' shirt, with the band wearing berets looking like leftist rebels... I agree, Riffy is trolling, Yuo and nanky don't ask him to tone it down, but both have given me grief for comments, not even directed at people here, genralizations, kinda odd! Read what he has writtin so far about regular posters... and that is all he is posting here, no music or Stones. That's is why I think he is more offensive than the christian bashing, this is a Stoes site, not a religous site. So ,when people bash religion here, it is seriosu, but my religion, I call rock n' roll is a joke... maybe even the liberals here are conservative, since being different around here isn't respected that much. IMO, taking the greatest anti-war song, and making it about politcs that are polar opposite, is a desecration. Shows me that he isn't here for the same reason I am, he is here to be mean and start fights... music has become second. When I die, there will be rock n' roll coming out my ass.... (this is emoticon time) :aimama When Riffy goes, he wil have tea bags coming out his... :retarded |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Starbuck on Apr 15th, 2010 at 6:20am PartyDoll MEG wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 9:39pm:
meg, the plural nominative ending for all second declension masculine nouns is -i. therefore it would be doofi. that being said, doofus is not derived from latin. piglatin perhaps, but not latin. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Starbuck on Apr 15th, 2010 at 6:26am Pdog wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:45am:
in your opinion, the religion bashing is less offensive than the riffbash. to many others, however, that isn't the case. and come on....rock is your religion? you can't be offended if anyone says they think the clash suck. that ain't on par with yours and others bashings of christianity. you are right though...riffboof does get a free pass for being inflammatory. time and time again. riffsmooch...despite howe many games of strip poker you've played with mick, your personal insults are....well they are just plain: |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by LadyJane on Apr 15th, 2010 at 6:47am
"Except they would swing liberal."
You don't know that!! You have stated many times that the Twins have sold out to the almighty dollar. All I'm saying is that when you pray at the Altar of Cash, there is no discernment between liberal and conservative. As for Riffy, I would hate to see him banned! LJ. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 7:04am Starbuck wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 6:26am:
i never said i was offended. you're making an argument based on conjecture or perhaps your own personal feelings and assuming I must feel this way too... i'm saying, there's no difference between what riffy is doing or someone bashing religion, both are either equally offensive or IMO, equally moot... making fun of religous myths is and using an anti-war message in opposition to anti-war liberals, is the same from my POV... Rock is my religion, it is when I say it is, that's what faith and beleifs are, not being some conformist, that has to do what everyone else is doing... it's been part of my spiritual life since I was very young. I never had a spiritual moment in a church, but had many at concerts and while litening to music.... what's amazing, is your tome, like what I said can't possibly be true... From my POV, that you don't feel this way as well, is what is wrong! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 7:07am LadyJane wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 6:47am:
Then tell him to follow the rules of YaBB.... or at least respect the mods... he seems to like fanning these flames, and why are me and you even discussiing this... b/c he keeps trolling and stirring the pot... then we all go here... I was completely honest, when I said, I would rather be banned myself, if it meant that Riffy would knock off the trolling, for the good of the board.... |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by nankerphelge on Apr 15th, 2010 at 9:51am
"Yuo and nanky don't ask him to tone it down"
He has never offended me personally, and so I have no reason to tell him anything. Besides, there is a whole contingent here that regularly rides him for his posting and the mods have told us all to calm down, so I see no reason to add anything to that. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 9:55am
" so I see no reason to add anything to that. "
!!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:36am
just a heads up, but one of the pip squeak, bushgeeks has had the gimme shelter/liberals thing in his sig for weeks now
sad sad sad |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by nankerphelge on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:43am Mr. Sex Drugs and Tattle Tale like a little fucking girl.... |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:45am nankerphelge wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 9:51am:
so the criteria, of what is offensive, is only if it is personal towards you? which isn't true, b/c you have made remarks about what others have said, that had nothing to do with you in the past... maybe it is just, that you agree with him, seems more like it... you might not have the extreme views or dislikes, but you do lean his way... I know I've said harsh things and also been civil with you, and gotten various reactions... provoked and unprovoked. Are you really saying, if me or say brainbell had started this political crap again, you wouldn't have cared, especially with some of the harshness, that spewed out, for no reason? you have sidebusted before and called people out, when you weren't involved... it's a reflection on all of us... he even agreed to stop posting poltical... so bottom line, IMO, he's a liar, and a troll looking to hurt people and start fights. and its lame... like i said last week, we had a real chance to mend and all get back to at least being amicalbe, if not even being friendly again... all we have to do, is stop political arguments, like was asked.... |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Some Guy on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:55am
dudes! New Stones!!
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:56am Some Guy wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:55am:
right |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:58am Some Guy wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:55am:
'Zactly :keithpunky :booze :willya |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by nankerphelge on Apr 15th, 2010 at 11:34am
"so the criteria, of what is offensive, is only if it is personal towards you? which isn't true, b/c you have made remarks about what others have said, that had nothing to do with you in the past... maybe it is just, that you agree with him, seems more like it... you might not have the extreme views or dislikes, but you do lean his way... I know I've said harsh things and also been civil with you, and gotten various reactions... provoked and unprovoked. Are you really saying, if me or say brainbell had started this political crap again, you wouldn't have cared, especially with some of the harshness, that spewed out, for no reason? you have sidebusted before and called people out, when you weren't involved... it's a reflection on all of us... he even agreed to stop posting poltical... so bottom line, IMO, he's a liar, and a troll looking to hurt people and start fights. and its lame... like i said last week, we had a real chance to mend and all get back to at least being amicalbe, if not even being friendly again... all we have to do, is stop political arguments, like was asked.... "
If someone says something that offends me - either a personal attack against me or an attack against my beliefs or substitutes opinion for fact, then I may respond just like anyone else. Whether you think that is provoked or unprovoked is a matter of opinion. I am not saying I have never been uncivil here -- I have at times, and I have apologized. And while I generally agree with Riffy's political leanings, that doesn't mean I agree 100% with everything he says, nor does it mean I agree with the way he says them at times. But I am not a moderator and I do not feel the need to tell someone else how to act here. If he or you or anyone else gets out of line, the moderators have demonstrated their willingness to lock threads. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 12:25pm nankerphelge wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 11:34am:
The moderators do enough, how often do they lock threads?, how often have they asked us to cill out? Asking us to chill, as they did, and even Riffy agreed, should've been enough. You make a good point... I think the Stones tongue, is a horrible reprenstation of what the song represents, and ironically, the lyrics are what many might call vulgar... I got shit for saying "eat my fuck"... gimme shelter is about, war, rape, murder and drug use... so what is considered offensive is completely subjective. I use the term, desecration, to describe the logo and words... and then I get ridiculed b/c i say rock n' roll is my religion. now that, is more offensive... but did i lash out, no... it seems to many here are quick to lash out, when they find some kinda faux offense on them, when in truth, they like you, ignore it when it is done to others.... me like you, we all have our moments... so who is going to step up, and end the political shit... when you think about it, what we are doing right now, should be as bad as a disagreemnt here gets... why not... otherwise, the moderators have to shiut down all kinds of shit b/c people act like assholes over every precieved slight and what they deem is offensive. I might be the only one, who has said rock n' roll is my religion... but shouldn't i get the same respect as those who are pissed off if organized religion is brought up negatively? I think we are all big enough to step it up, and man the fuck up... and when we cross the line, we pull each other up too... otherwise, this site, will die, b/c we will not attract new people.... and that is important, b/c it is the essence of rock n' roll... otherwise we wouldn't have done the things we've done together!!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Boomy on Apr 15th, 2010 at 12:41pm nankerphelge wrote on Apr 14th, 2010 at 5:40pm:
That's a damn shame. I love ER but that would've made it even better. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Riffhard on Apr 15th, 2010 at 1:35pm
Oh for fucks sake! Enough already! I jokingly posted a photo of a shirt that I purchased. I thought it was pretty funny, plus it had the added attraction of having some actual Stones' content. It was very tongue in cheek (no pun intended), and to anyone that had a brain that was obvious. I immediately was set upon by some jerk that I don't even know. This leonid prick has apparently been cyber stalking quite a few of our former regulars here for months now. He has managed to troll other boards that some of the greatest former RO'ers like to post on, and then he has come back here and tried to act all coy with this information. As if anyone gives two flying fucks what he says. Hey, leonid, here's a clue-you are laughed at routinely and you don't even know it.
It's very obvious that what Pdog is trying to get others to denounce me as a poster because I have zero problem telling people to go fuck themselves. I have watched as some of the best posters this site has ever seen disappear because they did not want to take the crap from a select band of posters that constantly harassed them because of their political views. Now these former posters are strong enough to come back here and destroy these intellectual lightweights with sound arguments, but they chose to leave instead. It's the board's loss. I didn't see Pdog denouncing the constant non-stop harassment of them. Did you? I haven't seen Pdog denounce the constant put down of religion, and of people's personal faith by the friends on his side. Did you? I didn't see anyone on that side denounce all of the lies told about Feej. Did any of you? I didn't see any denunciation of the constant Bush Geeks horseshit. Did you? It's almost as if the only people that Pdog wants denounced are those that he disagrees with. Which is quite funny considering that that is exactly what he is accusing Nanky of doing. It's obvious to me that politics can no longer be discussed in a civil manner on this board. If they ever have been? I am as guilty as anyone for that. I take full responsibility for it. Hell, I would even admit to being worse than many in that regard. What can I say? I refuse to take shit from anyone, period! I'm certainly no worse than many though. I'm outnumbered so I tend to use a larger caliber retort. However, I don't want to appear as a person that can't put politics aside for the betterment of the board. So I will no longer discuss the subject on this board period. It matters not to me. As I said in a post last week. Real life events on the ground are proving that I was right all along Barry anyway. So for my parting, and final, shot-Barack Obama is the single most dangerous, and least qualified president in world history, and he is going to fuck this nation up for years to come, and only like minded far leftists, and brain dead tools can't see that FACT. LOL! I'm out! See you on the Stones' threads! Riffy |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 2:16pm Riffhard wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 1:35pm:
Hey bud, I'm getting the last word on this one. our beloved, She Rat, left b/c of you, don't beleive just ask her, it's no secret... Denounce that, while you act like only people you agree with left or that I somehow didn't defend certain people or whatever your alleging in your delusional authoritarian personality disorder. Leonid is stalking you and others on other boards... are you for real. JC is flebit. Paranoid is one thing, add it with your foul mouth and finger pointing, trolling ect... i hope you do post about some Stones regualrly, b/c politcs doesn't suit you. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 2:17pm
" Now these former posters are strong enough to come back here and destroy these intellectual lightweights with sound arguments, but they chose to leave instead. It's the board's loss. "
******* SIGH !!!!! ******** !!!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 2:21pm
" Real life events on the ground are proving that I was right all along ........ "
!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 2:24pm
" managed to troll other boards that some of the greatest former RO'ers like to post on, and then .. "
!!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 2:33pm
" I have watched as some of the best posters this site has ever seen disappear because they .. "
!!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 2:38pm
" ... but they chose to leave instead. It's the board's loss. "
!!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Boomy on Apr 15th, 2010 at 3:09pm Joey wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 2:38pm:
Henery Hawk Approved |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 3:12pm
" What's happening? "
!!!! !!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on Apr 15th, 2010 at 3:36pm nankerphelge wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:43am:
I didn't mention any names, you just have a guilty conscious Mick and Keef would puke if they knew how some of their fans felt justified in using their logos and song titles on some pathetic, right-wing/Faux news sloganeering |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 3:50pm Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 3:36pm:
anyone who thinks otherwise, really doesn't know this band.... anyone remeber Keiths no war stance during Licks, or Jaggers love letter on ABB called sweet neo-con? but they are rich and famous and are making more money, they can't possibly be liberal... what a load of crap. What did the poster I just quoted actually do to Riffy and others? Leonid? Me? JC? nothing... nothing at all.... |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Ginda on Apr 15th, 2010 at 3:59pm Joey...it's best not to post from work. Someone might sneak up behind you and - well you know what happened to Luca. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by 2000monkey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 4:14pm Riffhard wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 1:35pm:
Heed these words mutherfukers or Glen Beck will shed fake tears! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 4:35pm 2000monkey wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 4:14pm:
you don't need a weather man, to know which way the beck blows! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:11pm
" It's the board's loss. "
* " ? " * http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2027/2147259833_aae6bcdd60.jpg?v=0 !!!! **** Young Joey literally laughing so hard he has tears in his eyes and he can not even see his keyboard **** |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:15pm Joey wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:11pm:
!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:16pm
joey is crying tears of liquid poo...
|
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:50pm Pdog wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:16pm:
when they say joey's full of excrement, they're not kidding he's like Mr. Hanky |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 15th, 2010 at 6:03pm Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:50pm:
howdy hoo |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 15th, 2010 at 6:27pm Joey wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:11pm:
Joey,you may be a lover....But you ain't no dancer. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 15th, 2010 at 9:59pm
" Joey,you may be a lover....But you ain't no dancer . "
S.C.L. ................................... Is not that Macca Glendale 03-28-10 CD simply OUTSTANDING ?!!!!!! I drove for miles in me car during the lunch hour and blasted the entire two disc set . Five songs off of " Let It Be " .. a FIRST ! .....and a seven song encore --- BEST MACCA YET !!!!!!!!! 'kins |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:06pm Joey wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 9:59pm:
Yeah Joey. It took a while to warm up to it. The sound's not quite as good as I hoped. But 39 songs later I was rocking my whole office with it. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Starbuck on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:56pm Pdog wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 2:16pm:
:aimama :aimama |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by leonid on Apr 16th, 2010 at 12:31am Riffhard wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 1:35pm:
What the fuck are you on about? Who am I "cyber stalking"? What other boards am I posting at? Or are you referring to that stupid board that you and a few others were posting at a year ago that Glencar linked here? The person that claimed to own that board (LOL!) posted here taking credit for it and Gazza banned him. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 16th, 2010 at 6:53am leonid wrote on Apr 16th, 2010 at 12:31am:
if you ever get a chabce, read up on authoritarian personality disorders, it will explain alot about some of this, not justify, but you can at least be assured, it's not really about you. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 16th, 2010 at 6:55am Starbuck wrote on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:56pm:
do you feel you missed your real calling in life to fan flames and not teach and play music? :wow |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Starbuck on Apr 16th, 2010 at 12:26pm Pdog wrote on Apr 16th, 2010 at 6:55am:
dude, come on now....your posting sherat left because of riffy is the epitome of fanning the flames....all i did was make a comment about the drama of it all. the amount of backchanneling and fingerpointing and "this-newb-is-really-that-long-departed-regular" detective work amazes me. 'sall i'm sayin'. in truth, we post in a cyber world where identities are very difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt...why not just enjoy the ride? |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 18th, 2010 at 10:15am
" ...why not just enjoy the ride? "
!!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Joey on Apr 18th, 2010 at 10:16am
" dude, come on now....your posting sherat left because of riffy is the epitome of fanning the flames....all i did was make a comment about the drama of it all.
the amount of backchanneling and fingerpointing and "this-newb-is-really-that-long-departed-regular" detective work amazes me. 'sall i'm sayin'. in truth, we post in a cyber world where identities are very difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt...why not just enjoy the ride? " W- What ?! : !!!! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 18th, 2010 at 12:29pm Starbuck wrote on Apr 16th, 2010 at 12:26pm:
did you really write "your" instead of "you're" haha... the student has become the master, oh - spelling nazi! i posted sherat left b/c Riffy made this place suck... i've talked with her about it, and asked her to come back... he was a reason she said she didn't like this place. we weren't backchannelling, since what i have said and what she said, regarding this isn't a secret nor are we trying to fuck with someones head... this is the opposite, it's putting shit on main st. |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Riffhard on Apr 18th, 2010 at 2:20pm Pdog wrote on Apr 18th, 2010 at 12:29pm:
Thanks for clearing that up! Pretty crazy how one thread that someone had to actively seek out would discourage someone from posting here, but whatev! Pdog? Riffy |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Pdog on Apr 18th, 2010 at 5:53pm Riffhard wrote on Apr 18th, 2010 at 2:20pm:
one thread, sorry dude, she elft b/c you were an asshole and mean, not b/c of a thread... if this comes as a surprise to you, that someone would say they thought you were a jerk, than you are in, what alcaholics call denial... if you are aware of this, and continue, then you're just still an asshole... and if you think anynoe is a crybaby, that would be you bitching last week over politics after everyone else stopped... I can't see why you're acting surprised, you yourself said, many times, you don't care if you piss people off, especially those who called you friend... the result, alot of people left. Some like Jon other like Erin... I was begging her to come back last year. She said, assholes like Riffy made it impossible at the time. Her words... not final, but pretty clear she was done for a while. And you need to remember, how many time, you said, you don't care if you piss people off as you posted vile hate filled rants. Only a dick, would call a friend a crybaby who pinted something like this out... |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Starbuck on Apr 18th, 2010 at 8:03pm
a few points of clarification:
Pdog wrote on Apr 18th, 2010 at 12:29pm:
i used "your" properly, copernicus...go back and reread the post. "your posting"...as in "not my posting, but yours"....a possessive adjective attached to a gerund...look it up...it's the truth! Quote:
i find it next to impossible to believe that sherat, the baddest most toughest hard drinkinest cussinest beyatch to ever skewer a newb, would stop posting just because riffy swears alot at liberals. she never even posted politics that much anyway, and we all know that is where riffy does 99% of his posting....come to think of it, she never really posted here at RO that much to begin with. she posted a ton at gasland and made the transition to the couch, but stopped after the couch went down (insert 100 ghey joey burning couch pics here). Quote:
your blaming fpm's departure on riffy? hell...he might still be here, if riffy's claims are true. plus, the whole fuck you nazis business and the across the street pouting were about the lamest thing i've ever heard...come on dude...you gotta do better than that! |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Boomy on Apr 18th, 2010 at 8:21pm |
|
Title: Re: It ain't safe to go on the "It's safe to go on Post by Starbuck on Apr 18th, 2010 at 8:47pm
my god boomie....all my kids want to do is fight with lightsabers these days. it is driving me f*cking crazy!!
|
|
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |
