| ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board | |
|
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> Keith Richards - Life http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1270061324 Message started by left shoe shuffle on Mar 31st, 2010 at 1:48pm |
|
|
Title: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Mar 31st, 2010 at 1:48pm With the Rolling Stones, Keith Richards created the songs that roused the world, and he lived the original rock and roll life. Now, at last, the man himself tells his story of life in the crossfire hurricane. Listening obsessively to Chuck Berry and Muddy Waters records, learning guitar and forming a band with Mick Jagger and Brian Jones. The Rolling Stones' first fame and the notorious drug busts that led to his enduring image an outlaw folk hero. Creating immortal riffs like the ones in "Jumping Jack Flash" and "Honky Tonk Women." Falling in love with Anita Pallenberg and the death of Brian Jones. Tax exile in France, wildfire tours of the US, isolation and addiction. Falling in love with Patti Hansen. Bitter estrangement from Jagger and subsequent reconciliation. Marriage, family, solo albums and Xpensive Winos, and the road that goes on forever. With his trademark disarming honesty. Keith Richard brings us the story of a life we have all longed to know more of, unfettered, fearless, and true. Hardcover: 496 pages Publisher: Little, Brown and Company (October 26, 2010) amazon.com |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Jesus Christ on Mar 31st, 2010 at 1:59pm
Looks cool!
Sure hope it's better than Ronnie's book. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Mar 31st, 2010 at 2:09pm
Keith can remember enough to fill 496 pages? :blankfriggingstare1
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by polytoxic on Mar 31st, 2010 at 2:13pm Jesus Christ wrote on Mar 31st, 2010 at 1:59pm:
Are his songs better than Ronnie's? Are his interviews? C'mon. It's no contest. Keith may make stories up but he sure knows how to to tell them. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by keefchik on Mar 31st, 2010 at 3:04pm
i like the title...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by mojoman on Mar 31st, 2010 at 3:49pm
some other title suggestions
DEATH- TAKES A HOLIDAY LIFE/DEATH/LIFE TALES FROM THE ROCK ROLL CRYPT NINE LIVES AND MORE MEMOIRS OF THE SKULL RING KING NOBODYS GONNA DANCE ON MY GRAVE HUMAN RIFFS REMEMBERENCES SASTIFIED SOUL I'M STILL ALIVE ALL ABOUT ME HONKY-TONK MAN STONED ROCKS OFF |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Mar 31st, 2010 at 3:53pm mojoman wrote on Mar 31st, 2010 at 3:49pm:
Isn't that book title already taken? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by mojoman on Mar 31st, 2010 at 3:58pm Edith Grove wrote on Mar 31st, 2010 at 3:53pm:
a horrible movie a few years back |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Mar 31st, 2010 at 5:21pm
Can they tour in support of a book? :-/
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Mar 31st, 2010 at 5:29pm
Id like to think thats merely a working title - and probably a working 'cover' as well.
Some pc-obsessed twat will probably insist on the book being displayed and sold in a paper bag, in case someone takes up smoking because of the cover and gets lung cancer. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Mar 31st, 2010 at 6:29pm Could be. Beats the original working title though... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Mar 31st, 2010 at 6:37pm
I always thought a great title would be "Happy" or Before They Make Me Run? or I'm Still here?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Mar 31st, 2010 at 7:06pm
Thief in the Night would have made a nice title too. I'm ready for that read. Even if Keith 'embellishes' a little it's sure to be entertaining.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Mar 31st, 2010 at 8:21pm
Cool! October release date ~ if there are no delays. Bring on a book signing, KEEF!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Mar 31st, 2010 at 8:29pm Bitch wrote on Mar 31st, 2010 at 8:21pm:
AH! Forgot about the book signings! Probably just NY / LA, maybe London, if any. :forfucksake |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Mar 31st, 2010 at 8:32pm
I LOVE it!!!
PERFECT title. I feel the wheels beginning to churn...... It's time boys. ONE LAST TIME................ :wtf1 :perverted :areyoufuckingserious |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Mar 31st, 2010 at 8:43pm
Oh ya! Book signings! KEEF c'mon man!
Makes me all, ya know, just thinking about it. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Mar 31st, 2010 at 9:49pm mojoman wrote on Mar 31st, 2010 at 3:49pm:
How about "Dead man living"? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Deathgod on Apr 1st, 2010 at 5:43am
Make No Mistake :areyoufuckingserious
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by corgi37 on Apr 1st, 2010 at 9:59am
496 pages is not much. Thats a bit more than 1 page for every year of the Stones.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Apr 1st, 2010 at 10:11am
I can see Keefs book signings now.. You line up at a fax machine inside the store and wait........
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Apr 1st, 2010 at 6:30pm gimmekeef wrote on Apr 1st, 2010 at 10:11am:
Good one! I cant really picture KEEF doing a book signing either, just hoping the publisher and/or book stores push for it! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by corgi37 on Apr 1st, 2010 at 9:18pm
Well, unless its got ALL the juicy, sordid stuff, no one will want to know about it.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 1st, 2010 at 10:37pm Bitch wrote on Apr 1st, 2010 at 6:30pm:
Yeah his arthritis is bad enough. Posing at a book signing won't quite cut it. :nanker |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Apr 1st, 2010 at 11:05pm sweetcharmedlife wrote on Apr 1st, 2010 at 10:37pm:
At least he wrote the Damn thing. At least Exile is being reissued with new tracks. We need to positive. This Band is NOT done. I am sure of it. LJ. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Apr 4th, 2010 at 10:19am It’s only books ’n’ shelves but I like it John Harlow April 4, 2010 SHHH! Keith Richards, the grizzled veteran of rock’n’roll excess, has confessed to a secret longing: to be a librarian. After decades spent partying in a haze of alcohol and drugs, Richards will tell in his forthcoming autobiography that he has been quietly nurturing his inner bookworm. He has even considered “professional training” to manage thousands of books at his homes in Sussex and Connecticut, according to publishing sources familiar with the outline of Richards’s autobiography, which is due out this autumn. He has received a reported advance of $7.3m (£4.8m) for it. The guitarist started to arrange the volumes, including rare histories of early American rock music and the second world war, by the librarian’s standard Dewey Decimal classification system but gave up on that as “too much hassle.” He has opted instead for keeping favoured volumes close to hand and the rest languishing on dusty shelves. Richards has also acted as a public library, lending out copies of the latest Bernard Cornwell or Len Deighton novels to friends without much hope of getting them back. And, like the Queen at Balmoral, he leaves favoured books by the bedside for guests staying at Redlands, his moated Elizabethan farmhouse near West Wittering in West Sussex and in Weston, Connecticut. In his autobiography, Life, due to be published in October, Richards will reveal how, as a child growing up in the post-war-austerity of 1950s London, he found refuge in books before he discovered the blues. He has declared: “When you are growing up there are two institutional places that affect you most powerfully: the church, which belongs to God, and the public library, which belongs to you. The public library is a great equaliser.” Richards has signed up to the Little, Brown Book Group and will share writing duties with James Fox, the author of White Mischief, which charted aristocratic excess in pre-war Kenya. The Sunday Times |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Apr 4th, 2010 at 10:30am
Looking forward to that autobiography.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Zack on Apr 4th, 2010 at 10:51am left shoe shuffle wrote on Apr 4th, 2010 at 10:19am:
Hope he fares better than the James Fox that Jagger worked with. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by moy on Apr 4th, 2010 at 1:23pm
How hell-raising Rolling Stone Keith Richards wanted to become a librarian
By Simon Cable Last updated at 3:05 PM on 04th April 2010 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1263492/How-hell-raising-Rolling-Stone-Keith-Richards-wanted-librarian.html#ixzz0k9nQceYu Bookworm: Rolling Stones guitarist is an avid reader When it comes to living a life of excess, he virtually wrote the rulebook. But Rolling Stones fans eager to hear about Keith Richard's debaucherous tales of sex, drugs and rock n roll in his upcoming autobiography may be a little disappointed. It appears that the guitarist has made a rather startling confession: He is in fact an avid bookworm who has taken great pride in developing libraries inside his homes in Sussex and Connecticut. Sources in the publishing world who are familiar with the contents of his memoirs, claim he admits to once considering 'professional training' to manage his vast collection of books. The 66-year-old is said to have started painstakingly arranging copies of rare books about the history of early American rock and the Second World War using libraries standard Dewey Decimal classification system. Despite apparently giving up on the idea because it was 'too much hassle', he still takes pride in displaying his favourite books by the bedside for guests who visit Redlands, his Elizabethan farmhouse in West Sussex and his property in Weston, Connecticut. He is also said to enthusiastically lend volumes of Bernard Cornwell and Len Deighton novels to friends, according the The Times. In his autobiography, which is due out in October, Richards it is claimed that he will talk about how he developed a love of reading whilst growing up in the suburbs of London following the Second World War and before discovering music. He once said: 'When you are growing up there are two institutional places that affect you most powerfully: the church, which belongs to God and the public library, which belongs to you. The public library is a great equaliser.' Rock god: Richards on stage with Rolling Stones members Charlie Watts and Mick Jagger It is not quite what fans expected to hear ahead of publication of his autobiography and from a man who has spent almost five decades on the road with one of the most hedonistic bands in music history. He reportedly received an advance of £4.8million from publishers Little Brown in the hope that he would open up about his most infamous moments, including his numerous drug busts and an incident when he underwent brain surgery after he fell out of a coconut tree. He also once claimed to have snorted his father's ashes along with a line a cocaine. The Rolling Stone has also revealed he was finding it 'very difficult' to remember things for the book. In an interview, Richards said he was working on the project with friend and writer James Fox. But he said: 'I’m trying to remember things, which is very difficult.' |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Apr 4th, 2010 at 1:36pm Funny how the British papers crib each other's stuff. You never see the NY Post or Daily News quote articles from The New York Times. Or vice versa. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Apr 4th, 2010 at 2:58pm
keith is really a total nerd... which is why he is so cool...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 29th, 2010 at 7:09am Keith's life Keith Richards of The Rolling Stones wined and dined about 50 influential booksellers at a cocktail party this week in an attempt to fan the flames for his long-awaited memoir entitled "Life," which is due out this fall. While the legendary guitarist stayed away from the convention floor of this week's Book Expo America at the Javits Center, Richards loomed large in publishing circles. His literary agent, Ed Victor, and longtime manager, Jane Rose, were making the rounds at the Thompson Hotel Wednesday night with Indiana Pacers owner Herbert Simon, who became a hero to the literary set when he saved the Kirkus Reviews from extinction last year after Nielsen Business Media announced it was shutting down the title. The English rights to Richards' autobiography were sold for close to $8 million in 2007 and Little, Brown CEO Michael Pietsch told us that the first printing will be "at least 1 million. It is going to be huge, huge, huge." It is slated to hit with a one-day lay down on Oct. 26, and will include a major publicity tour and heavy promotion by Richards himself. The book, which was co-written with James Fox, is said to be a true tell-all, including details about the infamous drug bust at Redlands, where a drug-tripping Richards calmly invited the cops who came to raid him into his home. Pitesch is promising a $500,000 marketing campaign, which in the book world is the equivalent of a big budget movie marketing push. New York Post |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Scottfree on May 29th, 2010 at 7:26am Bitch wrote on Mar 31st, 2010 at 8:21pm:
I fear that Keef may not be able to work a pen at this point, not unlike a guitar, sadly.... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on May 29th, 2010 at 8:39am
Scottfree, you are more and more negative with each post. What a jerk!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by GotToRollMe on May 29th, 2010 at 12:15pm Already available for pre-order on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Life-Keith-Richards/dp/031603438X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1275153231&sr=1-1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on May 29th, 2010 at 12:31pm left shoe shuffle wrote on May 29th, 2010 at 7:09am:
So much for the Daily Mail story that the reason he didnt go to Cannes with Mick was because they fell out when doing the Exile promotion in New York... ::) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 29th, 2010 at 12:41pm Well, the Cannes premiere was last week. But - it had been reported that, contrary to the initial stories, Mick would be the only Stone attending. Due diligence loses out to sensationalism yet again... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on May 29th, 2010 at 2:02pm left shoe shuffle wrote on May 29th, 2010 at 7:09am:
Will the heavy promotion include a guitar in anyway?.....A guitar and a pen? :willya |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on May 29th, 2010 at 3:29pm
It is slated to hit with a one-day lay down on Oct. 26, and will include a major publicity tour and heavy promotion by Richards himself.
Great news! KEEF will be making personal appearances and NYC will be one stop that is sure to be on promo tour! OK Ronnie's book signing was on Halloween night at the Union Square Barnes & Noble. It has a security checkpoint, an upstairs area large enough for entourage, tables, press box, chairs for the customers, and cash registers to ring up the sales. Ca-ching! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SoulPlunderer on May 31st, 2010 at 5:54pm Bitch wrote on May 29th, 2010 at 3:29pm:
I hear that it's being delayed as he wants to add a extra chapter about his encounter with you, Bitch at Bernards show!!! :interestingstuffronnie |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jun 2nd, 2010 at 7:48am Keith Richards teams up with Nick Kent for forthcoming autobiography 2 June 2010 Former NME journalist Nick Kent has been helping Keith Richards pen his autobiography. Kent, speaking at the recent Hay Festival, revealed that he helped The Rolling Stones guitarist "fill in" the gaps in his memory of the '70s. Richards revealed last month that he is currently waiting to read the proofs of the book, which he hopes to release in October. "I've helped Keith Richards write his upcoming book on the years of the early '70s. I helped fill in the early '70s, when things got really, really bad. I can understand why he forgot all about it. It just wasn't pleasant," Kent explained. He added: "His memories are incredibly gloomy. A lot of resentment, bitterness, Keith broke down in tears several times when he talked about it and turned into a blubbering wreck. It was a bad time for him. When you look back on your life you tend to suppress bad memories and that's what he's done, apart from the fact that he was taking more drugs than all Motley Crue put together." NME |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbled on Jun 2nd, 2010 at 9:10am
Its amazing that he made it out of that time period. It was really hard to watch him decline for so long. Hiding from fame. I mean who can blame him really. Its hard for introvert to be pounced on all the time. Anyway, he is a champion to live thru it.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jun 2nd, 2010 at 7:53pm
If Nick Kent's eye-witness 'accounts' in his book 'The Dark Stuff' of various on-stage incidents involving Keith on the '82 tour are anything to go by, they may as well file this autobiography in the 'fiction' department.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Jun 3rd, 2010 at 3:45am GotToRollMe wrote on May 29th, 2010 at 12:15pm:
There's an audiobook version too!!! Listening to Keith narrating his life story, oh boy! 8-) When it's released I'm going to pack supplies and stay at home until I've listened to it all ;D |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbled on Jun 3rd, 2010 at 9:13am
The above Nick Kent article is now being recanted in NME as of today 6-3-10:
http://www.nme.com/news/the-rolling-stones/51341 Veteran music journalist Nick Kent has reiterated that his role in the writing of Keith Richards' autobiography is minimal, after parts of his recent talk at the Hay Festival were taken out of context. Kent told NME that he was interviewed for the book once by the co-writer James Fox and is not working with the guitarist on the volume. "I've not been in direct contact with any of The Rolling Stones for well over a decade," Kent explained. "Three years ago, I gave a single interview to James Fox – the book's real co-writer – specifically about the guitarist's exploits during the post-'Exile [On Main Street]' '70s." He added: "But I'm only one of many people James has interviewed and my input in the work ended there. According to James, the guitarist has an excellent memory – particularly about his childhood and the '60s – and is using other peoples' reminiscences to contrast with his own, rather than fill in any inconvenient memory gaps. I've not read the finished tome either, although I learned recently it'll be called Life and become available in October 2010." Richards recently said he is waiting to sign off the proofs of the book |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Jun 4th, 2010 at 3:00pm
Well Keith apparently has a better memory than Mick, which isn't saying much!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Brainbell Jangler on Jun 4th, 2010 at 4:31pm LadyJane wrote on Apr 1st, 2010 at 11:05pm:
Now, that's the kind of "faith" I can get behind! :keithpunky |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Brainbell Jangler on Jun 4th, 2010 at 4:33pm gotdablouse wrote on Jun 4th, 2010 at 3:00pm:
Make it simple. Ask Bill Wyman. He doesn't seem to forget anything. :boring |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Jun 4th, 2010 at 5:09pm Brainbell Jangler wrote on Jun 4th, 2010 at 4:33pm:
Absolutely, in the Keith Rolling Stone interview in '71, Keith says that Bill has a computer mind for remembering. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Jun 9th, 2010 at 8:43am Gazza wrote on Jun 2nd, 2010 at 7:53pm:
Well actually KEEF has said that he omitted all of the 'very naughty' parts! So all the good stuff is left out of the book! Fiction! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 4th, 2010 at 8:51am Humping Jack Trashed Rolling Stone Keith Richards exposes Mick Jagger in tell-all book RIFT: Mick and Keith By Douglas Wight, 04/07/2010 ROLLING Stone Keith Richards is taking an astonishing pop at Mick Jagger - in a book so savage management fear it could split the band for good. In his autobiography the guitarist blasts the group's pout-lipped frontman for his wild love life, drug-taking and infidelity. Insiders say Keith has already been asked to tone down the book, called Life, after an early draft was deemed too close to the bone. But it is still feared the final version, out in October, could mean the 66-year-old rockers - who famously did not speak for three years in the '80s after a row - can NEVER work together again. Last night a source close to the band, famous for songs like Jumping Jack Flash, said: "In the draft Keith didn't hold back on Mick. It was years of frustration coming out. "He's used it to set the record straight on Mick's philandering, the affairs, the drug-taking and the fights. It promises to be dynamite. "It's thought management asked him to tone it down but he's been determined to tell it his way." It is believed Keith - wed to wife Patti Hansen since 1979 - has long disapproved of Mick's chaotic love-life. Jagger has fathered seven kids by four women and had flings with beauties including Angelina Jolie and Carla Bruni. Keith has spent three years writing the memoir after signing a £3.6million deal with publishers Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Our source added: "It will be huge. Keith used to joke that he couldn't remember half the things he'd done but his memory seems fine - and that's bad news for Mick." News Of The World Now that's a tabloid headline... Keef criticizing someone else's drug taking? :-? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Jul 4th, 2010 at 9:06am
Coming from the News Of The World you have to wonder, Keith blasting Mick for his drug taking????????
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Jul 4th, 2010 at 9:15am
Sounds like crap, first Keith ain't stupid and second he's English so I doubt he would blab about his "blood brother's" love life beyond saying he disapproves of it.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 4th, 2010 at 3:34pm Keith Richards plans book to lift lid on relationship with Sir Mick Jagger (and guess which Rolling Stone's not pleased?) By Simon Cable Last updated at 7:36 PM on 4th July 2010 It is being billed as the ultimate tale of rock n' roll excess, a must read for every rock fan. Everyone, that is, except for Mick Jagger. Indeed, the Rolling Stones star is said to be so unhappy about the prospect of Keith Richard's tell-all autobiography, that some have been left fearing for the future of the band. Tumbling dice: Keith Richards' autobiography is being seen as a big gamble by the guitarist because its revelations could permanently fracture the band The book, entitled Life, is not being released until October, but it is said to contain numerous revelations about Sir Mick's private life, including his affairs and drug-taking. An early draft has already been written, with The Rolling Stones management advising him to tone certain sections down in order to avoid a confrontation with his bandmate. Richards, 66, signed a £4.8million deal with publishers Little Brown in 2007 after a huge bidding war to seal the rights for his autobiography. Jagger had also considered writing his own autobiography three years ago, but then decided against it. And insiders have been astonished by how honest the book is, with one saying: 'Keith once said he was finding it difficult to remember things when he first sat down to start writing it. But his memory seems pretty good. 'It's going to be explosive when it comes out.' So far, details of the book have been a closely guarded secret. However, it has been revealed that in one passage, the star admits he is fact an avid bookworm who has built libraries inside his homes in England and America. Richards and Jagger have known each other for more than 50 years having been at primary school together in Dartford, Kent. However, the pair are said to have been at loggerheads recently, with Richards staying away from the Cannes Film festival after falling out with Jagger about the way he has been promoting their film, Stones In Exile. It has also been suggested that the band's touring days may now be over, following a number of rows. Richards has on numerous occasions publicly slated Sir Mick, who in turn has taken a swipe at the guitarist's decision to go ahead with his autobiography. Asked about the book, Sir Mick, 66, said: 'It will be interesting.I would have thought that you'd actually have to be able to remember your life in order to write about it.' The growing resentment between the pair is, say insiders, rooted in Sir Mick's eternal energy and drive compared with Richards's often shambolic state on stage and off. Richards has accused his bandmate of being 'vain' and a 'power freak'. The guitarist, who had brain surgery two years ago after falling out of a coconut tree, said: 'He is a power freak and there's nothing we can do about it.' He added: 'Mick's a maniac. He can't get up in the morning without knowing immediately who he's going to call. 'Meanwhile, I just go "Thank God I'm awake" and wait for three or four hours before I do anything.' They have fallen out from time to time over the years, one notable dispute triggered by Jagger's decision to accept a knighthood in 2003. Jagger reacted by saying Richards criticising him was 'like a bawling child who didn't get his ice cream'. Daily Mail So the Daily Mail has added it's tuppence. In their eagerness to pile on, fact checking must've been deemed unnecessary. Keith's brain surgery was in 2006... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Jul 4th, 2010 at 4:46pm
Oh Good Grief! I'm sure Mick is wondering just what is in Keith's book. That would be natural. But to the point WWIV is on....I doubt it.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Jul 4th, 2010 at 6:38pm Keith shouldn't be shaking his finger at ANYONE. Maybe one of his grown children should write a book on what it's like being raised by 2 heroin addicts. Or Anita could offer an opinion as to who smacked her around harder, Keith or Brian. Seems like another knife in the back if this is true. I hope it isn't. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Jul 5th, 2010 at 12:42am
What a shock. Keith slagging Mick off to drum up publicity for himself. That has never happened before. If he says too much, I can completely see Mick saying screw this, I'm not touring with this knob. And to be honest, who can blame him?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Jul 5th, 2010 at 2:22am
At this point in their lives, I doubt anything any of them can say about the other is going to change things much. I mean, really. 40+ years.
Not to mention, this comes from a tabloid ::) or the fact that it won't hurt as something to get the publicity machine working, in preparation for a tour (?) Or am I just into heavy wishful thinking here? ;D |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jul 5th, 2010 at 6:08am
'Tell-all' autobiographies are so undignified and tacky. Keith should be above that.
I think, to be honest, its a case of journalists making a mountain out of a molehill. If Keith were to spend a sizeable chunk of an autobiography blasting a friend and colleague who has done more than anyone to help him maintain a career for the last five decades (not to mention been largely responsible for him enjoying the trappings of success that he currently has) then his credibility would be shot to pieces, as far as I'm concerned. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jul 5th, 2010 at 6:13am
MICK JAGGER AND KEITH RICHARDS: THE ODD COUPLE
ROCK ON: Mick Jagger and Keith Richards have remained friends since the early days Monday July 5,2010 By Julie Carpenter IF autobiographies have a habit of causing quarrels Keith Richards’s memoirs look like provoking a humdinger. While most of us are still reeling from the shock fact that Keef’s memory hasn’t been entirely erased by years of class A drugs – or indeed by falling out of a coconut tree in fiji four years ago – it seems that the raddled Rolling Stone guitarist has quietly finished his book. And the latest story from those who have allegedly peeked at the pages is that Mick Jagger won’t get no satisfaction from reading it. Keith, it is alleged, has let rip at his bandmate, blasting him for his philan-dering ways and has cathartically let “years of frustration” come out. The book entitled Life is out in October when we can all judge just how caustic Keith has really been but one things is for certain: the Mick/ Keith relationship has always been contentious, not least because their characters, while central to the band’s success, have always clashed and contrasted. “Keith slating Mick – you wouldn’t expect anything else would you?” laughs Chris Salewicz, the author of Mick & Keith. “It’s become like some old comedy routine and their differences probably boil down to this: Keith is completely dysfunctional – his rock-and-roll lifestyle is written all over his face – whereas Mick has got himself together.” Indeed one of Jagger and Richards’s most public spats was over Jagger’s acceptance of a knighthood in 2003 which the hellraising Richards interpreted as Jagger defying the spirit of the Rolling Stones and embracing the establishment. “I don’t want to step out on stage with someone wearing a f****** coronet and sporting the old ermine,” raged a clearly horrified Richards. He labelled it a “f****** paltry honour” and added: “It’s not what the Stones is about, is it?” referring to the band’s anti-establishment roots. Jagger countered that Keith “was like a bawling child who hasn’t got an ice cream.” At the time their relationship was dubbed “frostier than the Arctic circle” and this is far from being their only argument. Just two years later the pair were publicly at loggerheads after Richards gave an interview topublicise their album A Bigger Bang and, ahem, brought into question the size of Jagger’s manhood. According to one report Jagger “practically ran over to Keith’s suite” at the four Seasons Hotel in Boston to remonstrate. And in May this year there was a report of another bust-up between the bandmates who are both 66 and possibly should know better. This time Richards allegedly thought Jagger was being “arrogant and rude” about their film Stones In Exile, which was being promoted in Cannes. Historically the feud is thought to go back to the Eighties when Jagger decided to pursue a solo career. “That was the thing that brought our disagreements to a head,” Richards has commented but Salewicz also notes that it is because of Jagger that the Stones are still together. “Everyone sneers at Mick Jagger for being a control freak but actually Mick Jagger has kept that group on the road. Without Mick it would have fallen apart,” he says. The comment also hints at the core of the pair’s relationship: Jagger has been the band’s business brains and strategist while Richards’s role has been more about providing the group’s rebellious spirit. And while their differences may cause them to rant and rave at each other, what is true is that the pair’s longest relationships are with each other. Keith has likened their arguments to “a family squabble” and even compared their dynamic to that of an old married couple. “Mick has to get up in the morning with a plan, who he’s going to call, what he’s going to eat, where he’s going. Me, I wake up, praise the Lord, then make sure all the phones are turned off. If we were a mum-and-pop operation he’d be mum.” Partly because of this the pair’s relationship is unlikely to flounder completely. “you have to remember that Mick and Keith have a shared childhood,” says Salewicz. “They’re both from Dartford in Kent. It’s true that Keith was the boy from the council house and Mick was quite middle class, the son of a PE teacher, but they’ve known each other since they were four or five. They’ve got that common experience of being war children and they’ve got the same passions for music. At their core they’re almost like siblings squabbling. But if you’re going to pin- point one moment when the problems really began I would say it was when Mick Jagger slept with Anita Pallenberg on the set of the 1968 film Performance.” At the time the Italian-born actress Pallenberg was dating Richards but it is believed she enjoyed a brief fling with Jagger and when Pallenberg fell pregnant with Richards’s daughter Dandelion, Richards raged against Jagger and even refused to believe the child was his for a time. “Keith’s response to that was to plunge into heroin addiction,” adds Salewicz. “Despite all this macho bluster Keith is quite sensitive and I would say he has a more conservative idea about relationships. You don’t get the impression he cheated on his girlfriends like Mick Jagger.” It would consequently not be too surprising if Richards was to berate Jagger for his womanising in his autobiography. After his relation ship with Pallenberg ended (they have two children) Richards married former model Patti Hanson in 1979. At the wedding reception he declared in his own inimitable fashion: “She’s a wonderful girl, I ain’t letting the bitch go.” True to his word the pair remain married with two children, Theodora and Alexandra, 21 years later. Jagger, by contrast, has been rather less faithful, fathering seven children by four different women. He has been with current girlfriend L’Wren Scott for almost nine years now but Jagger is as famous for his affairs as for his rubber lips. His ex wife Jerry Hall remembers him sleeping with Carla Bruni when she was pregnant and has commented: “Mick just slept with every single girl that came round. It was tiring rushing home making sure he wasn’t sleeping with someone.” Adds Salewicz: “You could say they have contrasting bad habits. Mick’s endless birdchasing versus Keith’s dysfunctional lifestyle. You choose which is the worst.” While Jagger can hardly be considered squeaky clean it is the stories about Richards which are legendary. Keith’s marathon drugs binges during the Stones’ heyday would sometimes last nine days without sleep while breakfast would be a heady cocktail of tequila, aspirin and cigarettes. He once ploughed a car carrying bags of heroin, cocaine and marijuana into a ditch at 70mph, accidentally set alight his Tudor mansion in Kent and allegedly had a blood transplant at a Swiss clinic so he could pass the medical to get a US work permit. Of late it is thought he has mellowed and his tastes are surprisingly oldfashioned: he is wont to put on a George Formby tape after a concert, is a cricket fan and counts former prime minister Sir John Major among his friends. But he is still far more of a loose cannon than Jagger ever was or ever will be. “But,” adds Salewicz, “Keith may be having another go at Mick but I’d like to hear what Mick thinks about Keith’s endlessly dysfunctional lifestyle. I’m sure he’s got a point of view on that.” If Keith’s autobiography is as in flammatory as we are led to believe then we may yet find out. One thing is for certain: there’s far more mile age in these two old rockers yet. - Daily Express, 5/7/10 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Jul 5th, 2010 at 8:24am
One more calculated publicity stunt to increase revenue? Then Mick has his own book out in a few years and we all just "have to" buy it as well to hear his rip on keef?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Jul 5th, 2010 at 8:37am
Mick knows what is going to be in the book, and anything that is considered a fight between them, will be well crafted publicity, to help garner attention. And it will work, the book will sell more, the band will be preparing new music and tour and the show goes on...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Jul 5th, 2010 at 10:30am
IF these reports are true, I disagree that the book is part of a publicity ploy. I think that's possibly just wishful thinking on the part of fans who don't like to see the ugly side of the Keith they admire. Keith could fill a book with his own successes and failings without focusing on Mick's. All of us are prone to jealousy - Keith is no different and when he belittles his "friend" to make himself look superior he looks childish, mean and insecure. Just like the rest of us do when we stoop that low. That's just my opinion.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Jul 5th, 2010 at 10:34am
I tend to agree Ginda.
If true, this could indeed be the final nail in the coffin for their relationship, which is already tenuous at best. I'm worried. LJ. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Jul 5th, 2010 at 11:21am LadyJane wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 10:34am:
I know how you feel, LJ. One consolation - they may be able to quit one another but they can't kill what they've already created - and that is more than enough great music to keep us going for the rest of our lives. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 5th, 2010 at 12:07pm The Glimmer's working relationship is closing in on fifty years. If Keith's reflections are honest and objective, the book won't be as anti-Mick as the tabs are hoping... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 5th, 2010 at 12:27pm gimmekeef wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 8:24am:
Necessary to win gross. :wtf1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jul 5th, 2010 at 12:37pm LadyJane wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 10:34am:
I'm not. If the Stones' future is uncertain, it won't be because of some silly book. I mean, really, how much is Keith going to get for an autobiography? A couple of million? He could make that from a week of concerts. Hardly worth the effort in putting together a book that will jeopardize the future of the band and his earnings potential for the rest of his life. If he spends 90% of a book praising Mick Jagger and 10% of it bitching about him, which of the two is going to get the headlines? A load of over-sensationalised tabloid nonsense. And the public fall for this every time. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Holden on Jul 5th, 2010 at 1:39pm Gazza wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 12:37pm:
Indeed. :sad |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by texile on Jul 5th, 2010 at 3:20pm Ginda wrote on Jul 4th, 2010 at 6:38pm:
Or Anita could offer some insight into all the "curses and hexes" she put on people she didn't approve of, especially women. I like Anita's aura and she remains a significant part of the Stones' story, but on smack, she became petty and paranoid and, IMO, brought out that side of Keith. I read the 'Odd Couple' article this morning and was going to post it, but i didn't realized this was already an active thread. It could be just tabloid crap, 'i need a story..' that has been exaggerated to drum up online traffic.... As much as Keith has bitched about Mick in the past, I have a hard time believing he would diss his admittedly best friend and musical partner in a book. I would like to think Keith would be more reflective at his point in his life. After all, in Stones in Exile, which Jagger oversaw, Keith is portrayed quite wonderfully and romantic in spite of the drugs, so why would he be calling Jagger "arrogant" in regard to the film. This is most likely BS, but then again, Keith has lashed out before and with everyone, the Johnny Depps etc...- telling him he's the greatest living legend in rock and roll, Keith just might be believing the hype. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Jul 5th, 2010 at 3:28pm Gazza wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 12:37pm:
I'm not worried, but I don't agree. I think this goes beyond money for Keith. I've always thought he is the much bigger attention whore and he doesn't hesitate to slag Mick off to get attention, especially when he is jealous. For example, it was so obvious that he was just incredibly jealous about the knighthood and the whole, save his reputation and being in jail stuff was rubbish and he was just upset he wasn't in the news. Now this is a HUGE opportunity for him to get more attention and grab headlines and he loves it. If he says stuff about Mick's private life and other things like that, I can see Mick telling him to get lost for a very long time and if he does, he is completely right. It probably depends on what he says and obviously Mick will know well before it. As mentioned, there is stuff that Mick can pull up about Keith that's horrible, but I don't remember him saying things the way Keith does. Keith is a real ungrateful twat sometimes. Mick spent a large part of the late 70s and early 80s nursing him back to health after his drug problems and covering for his non participation and the thanks he gets is slagging off in the press. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Joey on Jul 5th, 2010 at 3:31pm
" Jagger has fathered seven kids by four women and had flings with beauties including Angelina Jolie and Carla Bruni and even Carrie Prejean "
< -- Friggin Beautiful !!!!!!!!! ******* PREJEAN APPROVED !!!!! *********** !!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 5th, 2010 at 4:54pm Zzzzzzzz. Carrie Prejean doesn't even know who Mick Jagger is.... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Jul 5th, 2010 at 5:43pm
How dysfunctional is Keith really? We all know he was during the mad bad heroin days, but since? How much of that is just him playing up to the old image?
He and Patti have been together for 30 years. That is amazing. Very few relationships last that long in every day life, let alone under the spotlight of fame. If he is as completely dysfunctional as the tabloids would have you believe he couldn't hold a marriage together for that long. I don't care how patient the woman is, it still takes two to make a relationship work. If Keith has taken some shots at Mick over his womanizing, that's fair. It is one of the big personality differences between them. Cause if Keith has fooled around on Patti, he has managed to keep it very quiet. Big difference between when he was with Anita and Uschi, Lil, etc. As many others have posted, this seems like pre-sale hype to me. If Keith wrote an honest biography he has to address the Anita/Mick flings. There is no way around it. I've always been curious as to how the Glimmers got past that and kept working together. How many friendships ever survive something like that? And if that is the angle Keith took in writing about it..how we got past it.....then that is fair game. Even with a few cheap shots thrown in for good measure. Mick was there. There is nothing Keith could write that could possibly be 'news' to Mick. The book won't sink the band. JMHO, but I really think it will take something catastrophic like a terminal illness or a death to that. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Jul 5th, 2010 at 7:07pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 4:54pm:
I don't think Carrie Prejean even knows what a book is. That she is mentioned in a thread that has anything to do with one feels wrong on so many levels... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Deathgod on Jul 5th, 2010 at 7:13pm
i hope the book has some 'wow' moments.
Not just going over the same ground. Give me some insights into the studio and the stage. Tell us how those songs and riffs came to be. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 5th, 2010 at 7:48pm Ginda wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 7:07pm:
The "Happy Birthday jb" thread was down for maintenance... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 5th, 2010 at 9:35pm Could Keith's memoirs destroy the Stones: Jagger and Richards have been feuding for 59 years... and it's coming out into the open By Alison Boshoff Last updated at 2:12 AM on 6th July 2010 Theirs is not quite a rocky marriage, nor a case of sibling rivalry - although Mick once said that they were like brothers who had been born by chance to different parents. No, the partnership of Mick Jagger and Keith Richards is all these things and yet far more - a complicated and 'completely dysfunctional' relationship; a 59-year association which can lay claim to being the greatest partnership in rock. 'With those two,' says a friend of the band, 'it's all about the niggle - there's always a niggle between them. They are like a couple of soap-opera queens.' Now, Keith has completed his autobiography, entitled Life, which will be published in October by Little, Brown. 'It's all about the niggle': Call it creative tension or a downright feud, Keith Richards and Mick Jagger have been at each other for decades It contains a full account of his views on Mick Jagger, including hundreds of critical words devoted to Mick's womanising and drug taking. Keith's opinion, I'm told, is that Mick 'has never been able to handle chicks', and he expounds this theory at some length throughout the book, criticising his old friend for destroying his marriage to Jerry Hall and for his cruelty to Marianne Faithfull. There are also passages about Mick's use of cocaine and marijuana in the Seventies, which are said to be making the publisher's lawyers turn several different shades of green. It sounds like rather more than a 'niggle', then - indeed, the question is, will it be enough to cause a permanent rift between them? Might this book finally split the Rolling Stones? Only a month ago, all seemed well when the pair were together in New York, laughing as they finalised publicity for their Exile On Main Street album re-release. But people who know the band say their bickering is virtually a way of life. Keith didn't go to Cannes last month to promote a film about Exile On Main Street because they were having one of their periodic 'moments'. There are times when they are not even on speaking terms - Keith recently mischeviously suggested to reporters that Mick had a small manhood, which led to 'arctic' relations between them. Keith, naturally, thought it was all a huge joke. Even now, they have separate managers and will travel to gigs separately. This has been the case, quietly, for decades. Neither, sources indicate, do they socialise at all outside of rehearsals and performances. But Stones sources all agree that their yin and yang relationship is the very engine which drives the band. 'The bottom line is they take great pleasure in winding each other up,' says one who knows them well. 'Keith, in particular, can never resist a chance to have a pop at Mick - and, of course, it makes Mick completely bloody furious. When Keith does an interview, Mick is always asking: "What has he said about me?" ' The tension was there from the moment their friendship started in April 1951, when seven-year-old Keith joined Wentworth County Primary school, in Dartford, south London. Legend has it that he glimpsed Mick showing off his chemistry kit to teachers and saying: 'When I grow up, I'm going to build an atom bomb.' Keith remarked that he thought his fellow pupil was 'a weed'. It's an opinion he seems to hold to this day. Ever since the seventies, Keith has also been in the habit of referring to Mick as the Queen Mother - an expression of contempt for Mick's social-climbing and faintly effeminate manner. He also says he dislikes Jagger's onstage theatrics, once remarking: 'If her royal highness had her way, we'd be playing in f***ing Panto.' 'Excuse me while I laugh,' he once said. 'He's a bit vain, let's put it like that. We want a vain bloke up there, don't we? Meanwhile, the band can go to work.' The issue of women was another area where their paths diverged. Keith is a one-woman man - in the sense that he sticks with whichever woman he is with at any given time. In the late sixties, he fell in love with model Linda Keith, and then, after a drugged-out period with Anita Pallenberg, he fell for and married model Patti Hansen. They have just celebrated their 25th wedding anniversary. The contrast with Mick's love life does not need to be laboured. Mick had a fling with Anita Pallenberg while Keith was dating her. Keith was said to have suspected that Mick had made his girlfriend pregnant. Was this betrayal ever forgiven? Keith is proud not to be a lothario like his Stones partner, which makes one suspect not. 'I've never started a relationship just for the purpose of wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am. Chicks are too precious for that,' Keith once said in an interview. It was one of his deliberately tactless interventions, made at the time when Jagger's marriage to Jerry Hall foundered. 'No one ever divorced me,' he declared, pointedly. 'It boils down to the fact I've never just been interested in a lay.' An outbreak of genuine hostility came in the Eighties, when Jagger made a solo album. Keith was furious and described what followed as World War III. He even tried to get The Who's Roger Daltrey to replace Mick in the band's line-up. He was so furious that he came close to hitting his one-time best friend. 'But there's no joy in punching a wimp,' he said acidly. Keith arrived for the recording sessions of the next Stones album, Dirty Work, with 27 songs, which went under titles such as Fight, Had It With You and Knock Your Teeth Out. The recording of the album in Paris in 1985 was fraught: studio time was organised so that Mick and Keith wouldn't have to be in the same room at the same time. To this day, Keith is irked when Jagger does solo work. Indeed, Mick's 2001 solo album Goddess In The Doorway was rechristened Dogs*** In The Doorway by Keith. A truce was called only in 1987. Bandmate Ronnie Wood said in his autobiography: 'Eventually I got my chance to make things right. As Keith and I were talking on the phone one afternoon-the other line rang - it was Mick in New York, saying Keith wouldn't take his calls. After our conversation had finished, I told Keith: "Mick really wants to talk to you. He's going to ring you right now." 'Half an hour later Mick was on the line again and [told me] "We're talking again".' That truce has held ever since, although Keith went 'berserk and bananas' when Mick accepted a knighthood in 2003, and threatened to pull out of a planned tour in protest. Even after he had been talked round, he was still fuming. He told a magazine: 'I don't want to step out on stage with someone wearing a coronet and sporting the old ermine. I told Mick it's a paltry honour . . . it's not what the Stones is about, is it? 'They didn't offer it to me because they knew I'd turn it down. It's b******s. You have to kneel and I'm not going to kneel for anyone. 'Mick came to me and said: "Tony Blair insists I accept this." And I said: "Well, you can always turn it down." You know, Mick wanted one, so he got one.' He added: 'He is a power freak and there's nothing we can do about it. I don't want to do anything about it. Let him b****r about. It doesn't make any difference to what we do.' So has the anger always been a one-way street? A Stones source says that Mick has, at times, been as furious as Keith. 'There was a nuclear explosion when Keith shot a Louis Vuitton ad campaign in 2008 without telling anyone else in the band. The etiquette is that you let people know - and anyway, no one could believe that Keith of all people, who's always banging on about Mick selling out, had done this.' The source added: 'The relationship is of two lifelong friends who enjoy being best of enemies. An underlying issue is that Keith is always jealous about Mick getting most of the attention and the money.' Mick may earn lots of money - but, as he sees it, without him the Stones would not have lasted so long. And it is true that his canny business sense and professionalism have guided them over the decades. Indeed, Mick has long disapproved of his bandmates' liking for a rock'n'roll lifestyle - most recently shown when Ronnie Wood descended into alcoholism again. This has also caused tensions over the years with Keith, who had an almost insanely destructive taste for drugs. In 1975, he fell over on stage in the middle of a song, and was so wasted on heroin and alcohol that he could not get up again. But there is a genuine fondness and affection between the two. Their fellow Stone Brian Jones once came back to the two-room dive where all three were staying and found Keith and Mick huddled in bed together for warmth. Quite genuinely, they are best friends. There is also a mutual appreciation that their rucks make for publicity - and the Stones have always had a great eye for a headline. When all's said and done, they are friends. When Keith needed brain surgery after falling out of a coconut tree four years ago, Mick was in constant contact. Keith sends Mick jokey faxes and drawings when they're apart. Keith, who is planning to make a further Rolling Stones studio album with Jagger, possibly this year, said: 'If we hated each other, we wouldn't be doing this, would we? Of course, we've had fights. That's what happens in a family. But we've got through it.' Marianne Faithfull went one better when asked to sum up their bond. 'Of all of Mick's relationships,' she mused, 'the only one that really means anything to him is with Keith.' Will that still be the case when Sir Mick has read his school friend's book? We'll find out soon enough. Daily Mail Daltrey? Riiiight... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Jul 5th, 2010 at 9:43pm
I'm sensing wire hangers again...where's my face cream?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by stonedinaustralia on Jul 5th, 2010 at 9:46pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 9:35pm:
unmitigated bull shit of the highest order |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 5th, 2010 at 9:49pm stonedinaustralia wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 9:46pm:
Zactly...At this point I'd rather read Carrie Prejean's autobiography instead of another London Tab report of Keith's book. :interestingstuffronnie |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Jul 6th, 2010 at 1:57am
In addition to that crap about Daltrey, Mick has never said we were brothers born to different mothers. He hardly ever says anything like that. That is pure Keith if it was even said. Even a cursory knowledge of the Stones will tell you that all the so called sources that are "friends" are probably bull.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Jul 6th, 2010 at 2:11am
I guess those sensationalist "articles" are going to keep coming all the way until the book's released - and then some. :wtf3
I don't worry the slightest bit about how this is going to affect the Mick - Keith relationship. As said, when you've known a person practically your whole life, there aren't really many surprises. One thing I've always admired in Mick is his patience when Keith occasionally speaks out more than he should... It's a very complicated thing they have with each other and I always thought it could be the subject of ten different movies or books or even a psychological thesis ;D |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by stonedinaustralia on Jul 6th, 2010 at 3:08am The Wick wrote on Jul 6th, 2010 at 1:57am:
sorry wick but i belive that one is true - i have read it myself - a rolling stone interview circa some girls from memory |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by texile on Jul 6th, 2010 at 2:40pm FotiniD wrote on Jul 6th, 2010 at 2:11am:
Mick has his faults, but most of those affect his personal life, not the Stones or Keith. Reading all these quotes, I remember reading them when they came out througout the years and I just have to laugh at Keith's big mouth. For Keith to bitch about Mick's lifestyle when he spent a good portion of his own life smacked out, is the height of hypocrisy or an inability to recognize your own faults. Keith needs to fucking grow up. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 6th, 2010 at 3:43pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Jul 6th, 2010 at 11:13pm
I'm fvcking worried that KEEF's book is going to send MICK into a major hissy fit! MICK hates to be criticized, and from his own bandmate and life long friend, it'll be like a knife in his back. I really hope KEEF toned down the MICK attacks and the press is just speculating and/or exaggerating. If KEEF disrespects MICK in the book, I will lose respect for KEEF. Sorry but I'm a very loyal person and if KEEF isnt, than he sucks as a person because MICK has faults, just like everyone else, including KEEF! IMO.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by texile on Jul 7th, 2010 at 3:22pm Bitch wrote on Jul 6th, 2010 at 11:13pm:
I honestly can't see Keith, at this point in their life when they should be taking stock of their history, slag Mick off in a book. I have problem with memoirs in the first place and I'd like to think Keith would show some class. If he doesn't and resorts to his bitching, it would, IMO, alter reputation as this cool, dignified musician who lives to rock and roll. It would make him seem petty, and that's what these books end being. I hope Keith doesn't dissapoint me. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jul 7th, 2010 at 3:40pm Deathgod wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 7:13pm:
Unfortunately those sort of books are for music nerds like us - and thats not what publishers pay a couple of million quid in advance for (and it certainly isnt what tabloid papers tend to focus on in their out of context 'exclusive previews', either ) They want bitchfests, drugs and lots of tits and bums. The released product will probably end up as some kind of unsatisfactory compromise |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jul 7th, 2010 at 3:46pm stonedinaustralia wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 9:46pm:
I certainly recall it being a tabloid story around 1987 or so. Whilst Keith wouldnt have had it within his power to 'replace' (ie 'fire') Mick, I suppose a slightly different scenario could have been available had Mick chosen to leave the band. There was newspaper talk of a "Stones Mk II'" with three different possible names being touted as potential lead singers - Daltrey (The Who having split at the time), Bobby Womack (on account of him having recently worked with the Stones) and Terence Trent D'Arby (as he'd recently sang with a Wyman led band at the AIMS Benefit gig in London). Almost certainly a simple case of idiotic journalists putting two and two together and letting their imagination run away with them, but its not as if this story is completely new. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by stonedinaustralia on Jul 7th, 2010 at 6:47pm
i recall the murmurings re Terence TD but the thought that keith would even contemplate working with daltrey is something i have difficulty getting my head around
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on Jul 8th, 2010 at 10:23am
I wish this tabloid bollocks were true, a new Wino's album would rock!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jul 8th, 2010 at 10:46am stonedinaustralia wrote on Jul 7th, 2010 at 6:47pm:
Keith was a desperate man by that point! Dont think he's ever been a big fan of Roger's singing, which would suggest right off that the story was utter bollocks. Worth pointing out that it doesnt actually indicate that Keith says this in his book. Could just be the Mail's own spin on an old rumour. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Jul 8th, 2010 at 11:41am
Rather than a memoir I wish Keith had put half the book energy into writing (or at least trying) one more great riff song. What was his last tune?...the 45 second Hurricane thing with Ronnie that they put together like the Live Aid fiasco?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Holden on Jul 8th, 2010 at 12:37pm gimmekeef wrote on Jul 8th, 2010 at 11:41am:
One more open-g riff? I'm afraid there might not be any left. I've been trying to come up with a good one for years. Then whenever I think I got one I realize later on that Keith already did it, either in a Stones song or a solo song. It's frustrating as hell. :sad |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by corgi37 on Jul 8th, 2010 at 10:09pm
I vividly recall the Daltrey story. It was never from anyone in the band. It was a total fabrication. I recall Keith laughing & saying no fucking way! He hated Roger's singing. I'm pretty sure even Bill chipped in saying never ever.
It was probably all a ruse to stir Jagger up. Who knows. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 9th, 2010 at 2:41pm This week’s “News in Keef” – memoirs could break up the Stones Scott Alexander Young Jul. 9 2010 - 2:00 pm Apparently the Human Riff is planning to publish his memoirs in a few months. They contain revelations that you can best believe won’t go down well with ‘Sir’ Mick Jagger. Maybe it’s his way of ending it. The Stones I mean. There is a time to quit and perhaps this is the only way. That thought just occurred to me incidentally. Well, the Stones have gone on for just about as long as anyone has had the right to expect. Longer. And through it all, the two real anchors of the band, Jagger and Richards, have schemed against and feuded with the other. They’ve been like two Grand Dames of Soap Opera according to some insiders. At the same time, Mick has been quoted as saying they were like brothers born to different parents, or ‘brothers from another mother’ if you will. Or again, even if you won’t. It’s certainly a highly combustible partnership, a love/hate working relationship some 59 years old. And still Rockin’. But for how much longer? Let’s see. Keith Richard’s autobiography, which is simply entitled Life, will be published in October by Little, Brown. In it, Jack Daniels whiskey’s most famous consumer is said to give full vent as to his opinions on Mick Jagger. For one thing, it’s hard to see Jagger being happy about his druggy past being resurrected, when he has mostly distanced himself from all that in the last, oh my God, twenty years? Nor are the robust opinions of his lead guitarist about Jagger’s relationships with women likely to endear the legendarily satyr-like lead singer. Because it’s already rumoured, that in Keith’s stated opinion Mick Jagger has “never been able to handle chicks.” It seems to me a sad way to perhaps terminate an association which could probably claim to being the greatest partnership in rock. As I said, it has occurred to me that perhaps it’s the only way to end it. But still, where I come from, you don’t dish dirt on your friends in public and I’d have thought that’s where an old rhythm & bluesman from Dartord would have come from too. It all seems pretty tawdry, but I’ll reserve judgement until the book actually comes out I guess. (Oi, Keef’s people! Can you send me a review copy?) trueslant.com |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Jul 10th, 2010 at 12:10am left shoe shuffle wrote on Jul 9th, 2010 at 2:41pm:
So if the writer is waiting for judgment until the book comes out, why publish this rehash of a rehash story? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Zack on Jul 10th, 2010 at 12:40am
To sell papers. :aimama
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 19th, 2010 at 9:27am Libraries seeking 'satisfaction' Starting with Facebook, Matthews Public Library officials hope to lure Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards to Fredericksburg. Matthews Public Library Aide Angela Michael shows off the Facebook page intended to attract attention to guitarist Keith Richards of the Rolling Stones. (Lebanon Daily News - Jim Zengerle) Matthews Public Library director Sheila Redcay is asking Rolling Stones guitarist extraordinaire Keith Richards to have sympathy for America's public libraries. Through a Facebook page she hopes could lead to some national media coverage, Redcay's goal is to invite Richards to Fredericksburg to bring awareness to the struggle that America's public libraries are facing due to budget cuts. In Pennsylvania, funding to public libraries in 2009-10 was slashed by 21 percent and was further cut by 9 percent for the 2010-11 fiscal year, according to state statistics. Richards will release an autobiography in October titled "Life" that reveals his desire to be a librarian. According to dozens of national news articles, Richards writes that he's actually looked into "professional training" to organize the thousands of books at his homes in Sussex, England, and Connecticut. As a child in 1950s London, he found refuge in books before he discovered his love of music. "In the book, he said he always loved books and libraries," Redcay said. "It made me believe that we might have some thoughts in common. I know he's British, but he lives in Connecticut. So I thought perhaps to come up with a campaign to simply attempt to get him to come visit." Redcay started the Facebook page in July and is hoping reach at least 1,000 "friends." If that happens, she will then pitch the idea to NBC's Today show as a way to attract attention from Richards, whom she feels could bring awareness to the devastating state budget cuts libraries have faced in the last several years. Because Richards will hold only one book signing in New York City at an undisclosed place and time, Redcay decided to invite him to a reception that could be held at the Matthews Public Library to coincide with the release of his new book. Though it wasn't easy, Redcay managed to get in touch with Richards' manager, who told her "that sounds like a very good idea," leading her to believe that the possibility exists, however small. Something similar worked for actress/comedian Betty White. In December, a Facebook page was created by fan David Mathews in an effort to get Saturday Night Live creator Lorne Michaels to allow the 88-year-old White to host the popular skit show, something she never had the opportunity to do in her 70-year career. The phenomenon took off, and the page reached half a million friends. White hosted the show in May. "I put this in the Betty White category," Redcay said, laughing. "Let no library be exiled from Main Street!" To help the Matthews Public Library reach at least 1,000 friends on their Facebook page visit "Keith Richards, Please Have Sympathy for America's Public Libraries!". Once a thousand 'friends' are accumulated, director Sheila Redcay will pitch the idea of asking the Rolling Stone guitarist to a reception to the library in Fredericksburg in October to coincide with the release of his autobiography, "Life." Redcay's goal is to create awareness of struggling libraries across the country. She also created a YouTube video to bring attention to the cause. Lebanon Daily News Maybe this'll touch a nerve with bibliophile Keith. You never know. And - according to that Facebook page, Jane Rose says he's ADAMANT about one book signing only... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 25th, 2010 at 5:45pm Keith Richards, Jay-Z to give talks at NY library (AP) http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/media/ALeqM5jgid-EopMIs8E4fhlZf3XokC0DXA?size=l In this book cover image released by Little Brown and Co., the cover of "Life", by Keith Richards is shown. (AP Photo/Little Brown and Co.) NEW YORK — Don't make them whisper: Keith Richards and Jay-Z each will give talks this fall at the New York Public Library. The Rolling Stones guitarist will speak Oct. 29 at the Celeste Bartos Auditorium at the library's main branch on 5th Avenue as part of the promotion for his memoir "Life." Jay-Z will discuss his memoir "Decoded" on Nov. 15. The library has hosted musicians before, including members of the Velvet Underground and David Byrne of Talking Heads. Other upcoming guests announced Wednesday will likely attract a more bookish crowd: Nobel laureate Toni Morrison, Pulitzer Prize-winning poet W.S. Merwin and Israeli novelist David Grossman. Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Betcha Keef will be making all the rounds in NYC that week. Maybe another visit to Jimmy Fallon, or a stop at the Ed Sullivan Theatre. And hopefully a book signing... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:00am
A sneak preview (thanks to RipThis on IORR for finding it) :
http://blog.booktopia.com.au/2010/08/26/life-by-keith-richards-with-an-excerpt/ |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:06am left shoe shuffle wrote on Aug 25th, 2010 at 5:45pm:
According to Addicted on IORR. Keith has insisted on only 1 book signing. That being in NYC,so good possibility. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:23am sweetcharmedlife wrote on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:06am:
Cheers, Keith..... >:( |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:32am That was mentioned in the article about the PA library that wanted Keith to visit. Jane Rose says Keith's ADAMANT - one and done... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:59am left shoe shuffle wrote on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:32am:
Ok,I knew I saw it somehwere. That is going to be a zoo I'm predicting. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 26th, 2010 at 12:56pm More details about the October 29th NY Public Library appearance: Tickets for Keith Richards and Jay-Z will be announced via email. Sign up at www.nypl.org/LIVE for these announcements. Tickets are $25 general admission and $15 Library donors, seniors, and students with valid identification, and are available through by calling 1.888.71.TICKETS (1.888.718.4253) or on the ShowClix website www.showclix.com. Please note all tickets are non-refundable and non-exchangeable. New York Public Library According to the NYPL website, the Celeste Bartos Auditorium holds less than 200 people. Gonna be a tough ticket... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ade on Aug 26th, 2010 at 1:07pm Gazza wrote on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:23am:
shitting all over the UK fans once again. thanks Keith. >:( |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 26th, 2010 at 3:25pm This article says that Keith's NYPL appearance includes a book signing. If that's accurate, and he's only doing one signing, tickets just got exponentially tougher... Keith Richards Book Has Release Date As Gibson.com previously reported, Rolling Stones guitarist and rock legend Keith Richards has been working on an autobiography. Now that book has a name and release date. Life will be available in stores and through online retailers on October 26. According to a press release from publisher Little, Brown & Company, the book will cover Richards’ entire career: “The man himself tells his story of life in the crossfire hurricane. Listening obsessively to Chuck Berry and Muddy Waters records, learning guitar and forming a band with Mick Jagger and Brian Jones. The Rolling Stones’ first fame and the notorious drug busts that led to his enduring image an outlaw folk hero. Creating immortal riffs like the ones in “Jumping Jack Flash” and “Honky Tonk Women.” Falling in love with Anita Pallenberg and the death of Brian Jones. Tax exile in France, wildfire tours of the U.S., isolation and addiction. Falling in love with Patti Hansen. Bitter estrangement from Jagger and subsequent reconciliation. Marriage, family, solo albums and Xpensive Winos, and the road that goes on forever.” “Keef” wrote the book with author James Fox, who had an international best-seller with White Mischief. Richards and Fox have known each other since the latter was a writer for the Sunday Times in the late ’70s. According to the press release, “With his trademark disarming honesty, Keith Richard brings us the story of a life we have all longed to know more of, unfettered, fearless, and true.” The week of the book’s release, Richards is scheduled to speak and do a signing at the New York City Library’s main branch in Manhattan. gibson.com |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Aug 27th, 2010 at 1:52am Gazza wrote on Aug 26th, 2010 at 10:00am:
Thanks RipThis and Gazza! :) And an excerpt from the Nellcote days, no less. Sweet! I can't wait to get my hands on this. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbled on Aug 27th, 2010 at 3:51pm
HEY LOOK AT THIS
Angela Davis (the SWEET BLACK ANGEL) is speaking at the same auditorium 2 days before Mr. Richards: ANGELA DAVIS & TONI MORRISON in conversation Wednesday, October 27, 2010 at 7:00PM in the Celeste Bartos Forum KEITH RICHARDS Friday, October 29, 2010 at 7:00PM in the Celeste Bartos Forum |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:21am Called the NYPL today. Was told these appearances "usually" include signings, and books can be purchased at the event. No firm on sale date yet, but tickets should be available about a month in advance. Demand is expected to be very high. The e-mail list will supposedly get the first heads up, and a yay or nay on Keith's signing will be included... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Honky Tonk Man on Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:50am Ade wrote on Aug 26th, 2010 at 1:07pm:
Right on, Ade. Where exactly is it you're from, Keith? What's that? Dartford? What, that place just south of London? If you're going to to the one book signing Mr. Richards, it should be WH Smith's in friggin' Dartford High Street. New York City my arse! >:( |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Honky Tonk Man on Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:57am
I see the sleeve design has been jazzed up somewhat with a more appealing font.
New York City - my arse >:( |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Aug 30th, 2010 at 12:16pm Honky Tonk Man wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:50am:
You surprised, Alex? New York gets all the club/theatre shows each tour. Stands to sense why they get all the book signings too. >:( |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Aug 30th, 2010 at 12:46pm
Christ with his fingers these days it will take him 20 minutes per autograph............
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 30th, 2010 at 12:56pm Honky Tonk Man wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:57am:
Don't see anything. Guess that's the special "Ghost Writer Edition"... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Aug 30th, 2010 at 7:57pm
I'm going to sell my Black Crowes ticket for the Tower Theater that night to go to Keef's book signing. My fingers are crossed that he does sign books. To my fellow Rocks-off'ers-If you see someone pass out after having Keef sign his book-that's going to be me.
I love the Rolling Stones. They are the greatest. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Aug 30th, 2010 at 8:19pm Steel Wheels wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 7:57pm:
Best of luck to 'ya! Let us know how it turns out. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:38pm
Great! NYC! BUT with only 200 tickets to be released, those will go to VIP's, bookstore owners, advertising execs and friends. It's all about who you know in NY, not what you know. Or you can grease somebody's palm at the door but it's going to take a lot of grease. I'll try to get in and show up at the Library and I might walk away disappointed but it's worth a shot.
Incidently, the Library used to be a place where drug dealers hung out at night and cars would drive by for a nickle or a dime bag, and you never got out of the car! Then it got dangerous when they started selling crack and you could spot the lookout men on top of the building across the street holding big guns. It seems ironic that KEEF would use the Library for the book signing location. Bookworms by day and Druglords by night! I wonder if KEEF knows about it. I bet he does. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bingo on Aug 31st, 2010 at 12:08am Bitch wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:38pm:
They use to sell loose joints for the lunch time crowd. I know, I was a steady customer, everyday. That was back in 1983ish. Loose joints and shish kabobs a.k.a. cat kabob's from the vendors on the corner. People who only been in NYC the last 10 years or so, have no idea how crazy NYC use to be...of course I use the word crazy in a good way. 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Honky Tonk Man on Aug 31st, 2010 at 6:58am left shoe shuffle wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 12:56pm:
LOL, something isn't working. http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0297854399/ref=s9_simh_gw_p14_i1?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=1ANJKCHEKHT5P799EACW&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=467128533&pf_rd_i=468294 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 31st, 2010 at 9:39am Vanity Fair interviewed Nick Kent for his latest book, Apathy for the Devil: A 70s Memoir. An excerpt regarding Life: Are you looking forward to the Keith Richards memoir? Oh, yeah. I gave an interview for it, so I might even be in it. I might even be quoted in it. I’m gonna read it, sure. I’ve been often in touch with James Fox, the guy who’s writing it—not to be confused with James Fox, the actor in Performance. This is another James Fox, who did a very successful book called White Mischief. James is Keith’s age, and he had a brain aneurysm and had a metal plate in his head, and that’s the reason that Keith warmed to him, because Keith of course has a metal plate in his head. James said that Keith was rather disinterested, and I believe it was James saying, “I’ve got this piece of metal in my head,” that made the difference. Keith said, “Oh, you’ve got a piece of metal in your head, you’re on. You can be my ghost writer.” Vanity Fair |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbled on Aug 31st, 2010 at 11:58am
ouch a metal plate???? I had an old boyfriend once that had a metal plate in his arm due to a skateboard park accident and everytime it rained he was in excruciating pain.
ouch. ouch ouch. no bueno |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Aug 31st, 2010 at 12:25pm Tumbled wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 11:58am:
Not to mention the fact that it would set of the metal detector at the airport. :blankfriggingstare1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbled on Aug 31st, 2010 at 3:10pm
May not be entirely true considering the source, Nick Kent, who has been known to speak spontaneously without thinking sometimes.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Aug 31st, 2010 at 8:57pm Bingo wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 12:08am:
I'm glad someone else backed up my story! Those were the days my friend! Yeah, crazy in a really good way! |
|
Title: Keith to speak at NY public library ! Post by steel driving hammer on Sep 10th, 2010 at 8:53am
He'll either be talking about his book or introduce his band The New Librarians...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith to speak at NY public library ! Post by mojoman on Sep 10th, 2010 at 1:58pm steel driving hammer wrote on Sep 10th, 2010 at 8:53am:
RIM!!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by stonedinaustralia on Sep 10th, 2010 at 6:03pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 9:39am:
ironic isn't it?..after all these years dissing white boy rock bands and keith ends up a metal head!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Sep 10th, 2010 at 6:11pm
Did he get a metal plate following the coconut incident? I can't remember that being made public at the time ?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by stonedinaustralia on Sep 10th, 2010 at 6:59pm
from wikipedia
Trepanation is a treatment used for epidural and subdural hematomas, and for surgical access for certain other neurosurgical procedures, such as intracranial pressure monitoring. Modern surgeons generally use the term craniotomy for this procedure. The removed piece of skull is typically replaced as soon as possible. If the bone is not replaced, then the procedure is considered a craniectomy. Trepanation instruments are now available with diamond coated rims (Diamond Bone Cutting System), which are less traumatic than the classical trephines with sharp teeth. They are smooth to soft tissues and cut only bone."" if the piece of skull is replaced i guess it must be fixed some how - glue could be a bit messy |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by jigsawpuzzle on Sep 11th, 2010 at 7:53am
:wtf1 Who needs another book? 2000 years ago the apostles; get my drift would've carried it on. meanwhile the pharissies would've nailed him to the cross of rock 'n' roll for the sake of some archaic Bee Gees or something. Stanley Booth, Victor Bokris, and David Dalton have been there done that. The story of Keith; well you had to grow up with it. Sutton, to Hyde Park. Get my drift?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Sep 11th, 2010 at 9:43am
I'm trying to work my way into getting into that book signing, I joined the NYC library and am now on their emailing list of events. Maybe they get priority, not really sure but it's worth a shot. I want to see KEEF wearing the author hat, acting intellectual. I think KEEF actually is very intelligent but you cant tell by his 'good to be anywhere' voice.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Sep 11th, 2010 at 11:43am Bitch wrote on Sep 11th, 2010 at 9:43am:
LMAO...almost 50 years of Stones fandom has been reduced to joining a library?....you go girl!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Sep 12th, 2010 at 11:01am From the Chicago Sun Times fall book preview: Life by Keith Richards with James Fox (Little, Brown, $29.99): Here’s hoping the most buzzed about celebrity memoir of the season delivers the goods. He’s now officially a senior citizen, but Richards will never seem that way, given the life he’s led as lead guitarist of one of the greatest rock ’n’ roll success stories of all time, the Rolling Stones. If he’s half as forthcoming as Ozzy Osbourne was in last year’s Ozzy, Life should be one heck of a wild ride. (Oct. 26) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by keefchik on Sep 13th, 2010 at 10:15am Bingo wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 12:08am:
ooh yes.. nyc used to be crazy awrite ...buying garbage bags full of pot in stores in the bronx (one can of dusty soup on the shelf makes it a store) spanish harlem midnite runs and all the wall streeters in Washington square looking for a fix bahawaaa the good old days |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by keefchik on Sep 13th, 2010 at 10:20am Honky Tonk Man wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:50am:
keef might have been born in England but his heart & soul is from NYC... sorry... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by texile on Sep 13th, 2010 at 3:40pm AngieBlue wrote on Jul 5th, 2010 at 5:43pm:
I agree that its probably pre-sale hype on the part of the publisher. But Keith slagging Mick about his indescretions is about as fair as Mick slagging Keith off about the times when he carried his ass while Keith was a junkie and didn't give a shit. But Mick wouldn't do that and that is the difference. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by CS on Sep 13th, 2010 at 5:39pm Purchase Tickets All tickets for LIVE from the NYPL events are sold through SHOWCLIX ONLINE: WWW.SHOWCLIX.COM PHONE: 1.888.71.TICKETS (1.888.718.4253) Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.- 6 p.m. Tickets are non-refundable and non-exchangeable. All LIVE from the NYPL events are general admission. Arrive early for best seat selection. We advise the public to arrive by 6:15 p.m. for 7:00 p.m. events. Management reserves the right to refuse admission to latecomers. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 5th, 2010 at 9:30am Read the article here. Interview was done during the 'Exile' press blitz, but published now to to coincide with the release of 'Life'. Definitely whets the appetite. Great stuff... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 5th, 2010 at 6:28pm
Thank you for that amazing article. There are many layers to this man.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by texile on Oct 5th, 2010 at 8:10pm
Great cover shot. All craggly and wrinkly and iconic.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 6th, 2010 at 3:23am
Thanks for the link left shoe shuffle! I love the cover too. Raw and iconic indeed.
Can't wait to find some time to actually read the article as well ;D And here's a higher resolution copy of the cover: http://postimage.org/image/2sw4hbisk/full/ I find Keith's face so amazing. It's like you can see his whole life story, all the ups and downs. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Oct 6th, 2010 at 3:27pm
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ6VivZmrjTERwjxns92E163Dxm6tUE7FsprlR8DlX0AYnANys&t=1&usg=__GyUzR0UpTZpo76PkK7wvyENYjw0=
Thanks for posting the interview, LSS. On top of things as always. Great photos. Interesting perspective on life. Keith is a charmer except (for me) when he unleashes his claws on Mick. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 6th, 2010 at 5:29pm "People say 'why don't you give it up?' I don't think they quite understand. I'm not doing it just for the money, or for you. I'm doing it for me." -- Keith Richards A true and towering original, he has always walked his own path, spoken his own mind, and done his own thing. Reluctant outlaw, rock 'n' roll's unparalleled hellraiser, and one of the greatest guitar gods of all time, Keith Richards has forged a life that most of us can only imagine--and often envy. And amazingly he's lived to tell about it. Now, at last, in his own words, the ultimate rock Icon gives us the definitive rock autobiography. In Life, in his own raw, fierce voice, the man himself tells about life lived fast and hard in the creative hurricane--from his early days as a young boy growing up in a council estate, listening obsessively to Chuck Berry and Muddy Waters records, to taking the guitar to its absolute limit and joining forces with Mick Jagger to form The Rolling Stones. With unflinching honesty, he reveals all the highs and lows of rock 'n' roll, from the meteoric rise to fame and the notorious drug busts to the women, drinking, and heroin addiction that made him infamous. The living legend chronicles how he created the revolutionary, high-octane riffs that defined "Gimme Shelter" and "Honky Tonk Woman," his affair with the equally infamous Anita Pallenberg (the mother of three of his children), and the tragic death of Brian Jones. From falling in love with Patti Hansen to his tumultuous relationship with Mick, we follow Keef on the ultimate road trip we have all longed to know more about--of an unfettered, fearless, on-the-edge life lived to the fullest. keithrichards.com T-minus twenty days... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gimme Shelter on Oct 7th, 2010 at 3:43pm
Johnny Depp to read Life audiobook
Hatchette Audio has announced that award-winning actor Johnny Depp will read the audiobook edition of Keith's highly anticipated new autobiography. A part of pop culture since his days on 21 Jump Street, Depp has given memorable performances in films like Edward Scissorhands, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and this year's Alice In Wonderland. One of Depp's best-known roles is Captain Jack Sparrow from the Pirates of the Caribbean series. Depp has said in inteviews that he based the character on his friend Keith, a revelation that led to Keith's appearance as Captain Jacks' father in Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End. Depp will be joined on the 22 and a half hour audiobook by fellow musician Joe Hurley and by Keith himself. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 7th, 2010 at 6:13pm RS to Publish Exclusive Excerpt from Keith Richards Autobiography Next Week Oct 07, 2010 Rolling Stone will publish an exclusive excerpt from Keith Richards' long awaited memoir Life on October 15, eleven days before the eagerly anticipated book hits stores on October 26. The 10,000 word excerpt will cover the early days of the Rolling Stones, Keith’s trip to Tangiers in 1967 where he stole Anita Pallenberg from bandmate Brian Jones and tales of excess from the Stones’ infamous 1972 U.S. tour. "You can’t imagine that this book could be any better than it is," says Rolling Stone Managing Editor Will Dana. "Keith holds nothing back. It’s funny, gossipy, profane and moving and by the time you finish it you feel like you’re friends with Keith Richards. Outside of Bob Dylan’s Chronicles, it’s probably the best rock memoir ever written." Richards, who will appear on the cover of the magazine, also spoke with Rolling Stone’s David Fricke about the book and the Stones’ upcoming plans, strongly hinting that the band will be active in 2011. rollingstone.com "...strongly hinting that the band will be active in 2011." |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Oct 9th, 2010 at 12:42pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 5th, 2010 at 9:30am:
I just read the article today. Pretty rubbish tbh. You get a chance to talk to Mr Richards and all you ask him is the rubbish about his dads ashes, shepards pie and such. Nothing about the future of the Stones. Some great photo's though. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Brainbell Jangler on Oct 10th, 2010 at 9:50pm
"I've never been hated by so many people as in Nebraska in the mid-60s. You could just tell that they wanted to beat the shit out of you."--Keith Richards
:wtf1 Joey? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 12th, 2010 at 4:31pm On the cover of the Rolling Stone... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Oct 12th, 2010 at 4:37pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 12th, 2010 at 4:31pm:
Well we are big rock singers, we've got golden fingers And we're loved everywhere we go... [smiley=2vrolijk_08.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gimme Shelter on Oct 12th, 2010 at 5:23pm
Great cover!! Can't wait for my issue to come in the mail.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 13th, 2010 at 12:25pm
The library better get their shit together ASAP. I'm very anxious.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 13th, 2010 at 12:33pm Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 13th, 2010 at 12:25pm:
Sounds more like Keith needs to get his shit together and tell the library what his plans are. :interestingstuffronnie |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by texile on Oct 13th, 2010 at 2:06pm
I have trully mixed feelings about this book. If Keith talks about his experiences with the Stones, Mick, other musicians, his own battles, that's one thing, but when Keith starts going on about Mick's personal life and dissaproval of his solo outings, he shows his pettiness and it doesn't look cool or dignified to me. It's simply self-serving.
Keep it about you Keith and respect your best friend's privacy. If Mick wanted to write a book, he would - but he doesn't. Leave it at that. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 13th, 2010 at 2:16pm Keith's never shied away from taking pokes at Mick, most recently in the Another Man interview. Quite likely that 'Life' will include a few more... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 13th, 2010 at 2:25pm
What's the number of this RS issue? I always get confused with its circulation dates.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 13th, 2010 at 2:34pm Issue 1116, dated October 28th. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Oct 13th, 2010 at 2:56pm texile wrote on Oct 13th, 2010 at 2:06pm:
I'm with you, texile. 100%. In fact I may go give my Keith bobble head a thump... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 13th, 2010 at 3:05pm Keith Richards – A Culture Show Special Thursday 28 October 7.00-8.00pm BBC TWO www.bbc.co.uk/cultureshow To mark the publication of Keith Richards's autobiography, this Culture Show special looks at the life of the man with five strings and nine lives: the linchpin of the Rolling Stones. In an intimate interview with the man himself, the programme focuses on Richards's early life and the decade that catapulted The Rolling Stones from back-room blues boys to one of the greatest rock 'n' roll bands in the world. Richards talks candidly to Andrew Graham-Dixon in New York about his childhood in Dartford and the music that would change his life forever. The most enigmatic of the Rolling Stones talks about the drugs, decadence and life as the "yin" to Mick Jagger's "yang". However, as with everything in Richards's life, the music stays centre stage. Featuring contributions from friends and musicians who were alongside him through the screaming teens and rock 'n' roll excesses, viewers find out about the man who ripped through the Sixties and Seventies – in a blaze of cigarette smoke, booze and drugs – as a rebel, outsider, shamanic totem of rock and, above all, a survivor. BBC The man with five strings and nine lives will be everywhere very soon... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Oct 13th, 2010 at 3:09pm
Well, as these things go, advance media always focuses on the "juicy bits" -- even if they're a tiny fraction of the work overall...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Honky Tonk Man on Oct 13th, 2010 at 3:13pm
I’ll definitely be getting this issue!
Personally, I suspect that many of us will want different things from Keith’s upcoming autobiography. As someone who used to reside in his hometown of Dartford, I’m hopeful he conjured up some insightful anecdotes regarding his childhood and upbringing in the town, other than the hopeless ‘Arsehole of England’ quips that he’s been quoted as saying before. I’m also eager to read his views on the time spent at Edith Grove, his fractured relationship with Brian and what everyday life is like for Mr. Richards as a 60-something living in Weston, Connecticut. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 13th, 2010 at 4:32pm Keith Richards on His Remarkable New Memoir, ‘Life’ In the latest issue of ‘Rolling Stone’ the 66-year-old guitarist talks about his highs, lows and death-defying excesses By David Fricke Oct 13, 2010 The following is an excerpt of an article from the October 28, 2010 issue of Rolling Stone. This issue is available tomorrow on newsstands, and Friday, October 15 online via Rolling Stone's premium subscription plan "I don't think I looked for it," Keith Richards says in a low, even growl. The Rolling Stones guitarist is talking about trouble, the kind that runs through his autobiography, Life, like a hellbound train: drugs, cops, cold turkey, death and the turbulent relationship between Richards and his Glimmer Twin and childhood friend, singer Mick Jagger. "That's just the way things pan out," Richards says, sitting in his manager's New York office and sipping a late-afternoon cocktail from a red plastic cup. "Conflicts arise all the time, especially if you're working in such a closed unit." There is a rumbling chuckle. "If I'm in conflict with somebody, then it means somebody is in conflict with me." The title of Richards' book is a simple, accurate description of the contents: the 66-year-old guitarist's highs, lows and death-defying excesses, from birth to now, vividly related in his natural pirate-hipster cadence and syntax. Life opens with a comic roller-coaster account of a last-minute rescue from hard time in Arkansas during the Stones' 1975 tour. Richards, who wrote the book with British author James Fox, then goes long and deep on his postwar boyhood — an only child of divorced parents in the rough London suburb of Dartford — and the emotional rescue he found in American blues, the formation of the Rolling Stones and his creative bond with Jagger. At one point, Richards describes a recent trip to Dartford, visiting old haunts like the three-room flat over a grocery where he, his mother, Doris, and father, Bert, lived from 1949 to 1952. "It's almost like you're looking at somebody else," Richards says now. "Then you start to feel small things, like the smell of a gas lamp or my grandmother shuffling around and my grandfather going, 'Make the boy some egg and chips.'" Richards relates, with blunt detail, the outlaw rush and sordid daily routine of his decade-long affair with heroin, which he ended in 1979. "If I hadn't looked back on that, something would have been missing," he contends. "When I was taking dope, I was fully convinced that my body is my temple. I can do anything I want with it, and nobody can tell me yea or nay." But Richards also counts the damage from his choices: the loss of cosmic cowboy and fellow user Gram Parsons; the hellish descent of Richards' lover Anita Pallenberg; and the death of his infant son, Tara, in 1976 while Richards was on tour. "Leaving a newborn is something I can't forgive myself for," says Richards in Life. "The first time we talked about that," Fox says, "Keith couldn't get out more than five words. Then we realized we had to go back to it. He told me that he thought about it every week." Fox, who wrote the 1983 true-crime book White Mischief, first interviewed Richards in 1973 for a London newspaper. For Life, Fox says he and Richards "talked in topics and periods, never chronologically," for several days at a stretch, up to three hours a day, starting in late 2007. Life includes eyewitness testimony from people close to Richards who were interviewed by Fox, such as singer Ronnie Spector ("an early love") and saxophonist Bobby Keys. But Fox did not speak to the other Stones. "I did try," he says, noting, "There is a tradition among Rolling Stones of not having anything to do with each other's books." Life is ultimately two stories: one of music, misbehavior and survival; the other a fond, perplexed, sometimes outraged telling of Richards' life with Jagger, including their battles over control and the destiny of their band. "I had a feeling Mick would have no problem with the truth," Richards claims. He goes quiet for a moment. "No doubt I was as infuriating to him as he can be to me." Jagger read Life, Richards says, "and he was a bit peeved about this and that." But, the guitarist insists, "Mick and I are still great friends and still want to work together." Richards' proof: He and Jagger talked over the summer about new Stones action in 2011. There is another of those earthquake cackles. "Can you imagine if life went along smoothly and everybody agreed?" Richards asks. "Nothing would happen. There'd be no blues. There'd be no 'Happy,'" referring to his iconic blaze of joy on 1972's Exile on Main Street. There would certainly be no Life. Rolling Stone Essentially a promo to buy the mag or subscribe to their on-line archive. No surprise that Mick's read the book. Can't wait for my chance... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 14th, 2010 at 2:04am left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 13th, 2010 at 2:34pm:
Thanks! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by stones_addict on Oct 14th, 2010 at 3:49am
These pictures are awesome. I can't wait to get my copy
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Oct 14th, 2010 at 9:30am
I'll always remember a Guitar World feature on Keith, from '92. The writer/interviewer said Keith's thoughts, and the way he phrased them, were just like his playing — "funky and intuitive." That was so spot-on. I expect the book to be a lot like that.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Oct 14th, 2010 at 4:04pm texile wrote on Oct 13th, 2010 at 2:06pm:
Unfortunately, I think the last time they were best friends was about 30 years ago. I agree with you about the rest but Keith knows that twatting on about Mick will sell more copies. He's not always the pure non-commercial rock'n'roll outlaw that people make him out to be. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 14th, 2010 at 6:25pm
Has he ever been?
Remember the 2002 sessions when he was bragging around that this was the best music they'd made in years and then we got "Extreme Western Grip" and that other "song" whose title I can't even remember! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Oct 14th, 2010 at 6:49pm gotdablouse wrote on Oct 14th, 2010 at 6:25pm:
Those weren't intended as "new releases" -- more like perfunctory footage from a studio warm-up -- but the point is well-taken. It's been the "best Stones in years" for the last 20. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Boomy on Oct 15th, 2010 at 8:44am
The companion song to "Extreme Western Grip" was "Well, Well", wasn't it?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Boomy on Oct 15th, 2010 at 8:44am Boomy wrote on Oct 15th, 2010 at 8:44am:
I called them songs. They were more like jams. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Oct 15th, 2010 at 9:48am Boomy wrote on Oct 15th, 2010 at 8:44am:
Even "jams" is generous. "Well Well" was just some time-killing noise before a run at "Don't Stop" or "Keys to Your Love." |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 15th, 2010 at 10:28am
Here's a chunk of Life. Enjoy.
The 1972 tour was known by other names – the Cocaine and Tequila Sunrise tour or the STP, Stones Touring Party. It was the beginning of the booking of whole hotel floors, with no one else allowed up, so that some of us – like me – could get privacy and security. It was the only way we could have a degree of certainty that when we decided to party, we could control the situation or at least get some warning if there was trouble. ------------- The whole entourage had exploded in terms of numbers, of roadies and technicians, and of hangers-on and groupies. For the first time, we traveled in our own hired plane, with the lapping tongue painted on. We had become a pirate nation, moving on a huge scale under our own flag, with lawyers, clowns, attendants. ----------- For the guys running the operation, there was maybe one battered typewriter and hotel or street phones to run a North American tour through 30 cities. A feat of organization on the part of our new tour manager, Peter Rudge, a four-star general among the anarchists. We never missed a show, though we came near it. The guy that opened for us, in almost every city, was Stevie Wonder, and he was barely 22. ----------- The traveling physician we’ll call Dr. Bill, to give it a Burroughsian ring. His specialty was billed as emergency medicine. Mick, who was getting appropriately nervous about people trying to get at him – there were threats and there were freaks fixated on him; people would walk up and hit him; the Angels wanted him dead – wanted a doctor around who could keep him alive if he got shot onstage. Dr. Bill was there, however, primarily for the pussy. And being quite a young, good-looking doctor, he got plenty. -------- He printed these cards, “Dr. Bill,” as it were, “Physician of the Rolling Stones.” He would scout the audience before we went on and give out 20 or 30 of those cards to the most foxy, beautiful girls, even if they were with a guy. He wrote on the back the name of our hotel, the suite number to call. He was into getting laid every night. And he also had this case of every kind of substance, Demerol, anything you wanted. He could write scripts in every city. We used to send chicks to his room and take his medicine bag. There would be a line waiting in the room with a waste bag of syringes while he was giving out the Demerol. ---- In Chicago, there was an acute shortage of hotel rooms, so Hugh Hefner thought it would be a laugh to invite some of us to stay in the Playboy Mansion. I think he regretted it. Hugh Hefner, what a nut. We’ve worked the lowest pimps to the highest, the highest being Hefner. He threw the place open for the Stones, and we were there for over a week. And it’s all plunges in the sauna, and the Bunnies, and basically it’s a whorehouse, which I really don’t like. The memory, however, is very, very hazy. I know we did have some fun there. I know we ripped it up. Hefner had been shot at just before our visit, and the place resembled the state house of some Caribbean dictatorship, with heavily armed security everywhere. ---- We had the doc there, and we’d get in one of the Bunnies for him. The deal was “We get free dibs on your bag and you can have Debbie.” I felt the script had been written, play it to the hilt. Bobby [Keys, the Stones saxophone player] and I played it a little far when we set fire to the bathroom. Well, we didn’t, the dope did. Not our fault. Bobby and I were just sitting in the john, comfortable, nice john, sitting on the floor, and we’ve got the doc’s bag and we’re just smorgasbording. “I wonder what these do?” Bong. And at a certain point . . . talk about hazy, or foggy, Bobby says, “It’s smoky in here.” And I’m looking at Bobby and can’t see him. And the drapes are smoldering away; everything was just about to go off big-time. To the point where I can’t see him, he’s disappeared in this fog. ---- “Yes, I guess it is a bit smoky in here.” It was a really delayed reaction. And then suddenly a flurry at the door and the fire alarms start going, beep beep beep. “What’s that noise, Bob?” “I don’t know. Should we open the window?” Someone shouts through the door, “Are you all right?” “Oh, yeah, we’re fucking great, man.” So he just turns away, and we don’t know exactly what to do. Maybe if we’re quiet and walk out and we pay for the reconstruction? And then a little later there was a thumping on the door, waiters and guys in black suits bringing buckets of water. They get the door open and we’re sitting on the floor, our pupils very pinned. I said, “We could have done that ourselves. How dare you burst in on our private affair?” ---- Hugh decamped soon after that and moved to L.A. Some of my most outrageous nights I can only believe actually happened because of corroborating evidence. No wonder I’m famous for partying! The ultimate party, if it’s any good, you can’t remember it. You get these brief vignettes of what you did. “Oh, you don’t remember shooting the gun? Pull up the carpet, look at those holes, man.” I feel a bit of shame and embarrassment. “You can’t remember that? When you got your dick out, swinging from the chandelier, anybody up for grabs, wrap it in a five-pound note?” Nope, don’t remember a thing about it. --- It’s not only the high quality of drugs I had that I attribute my survival to. I was very meticulous about how much I took. I’d never put more in to get a little higher. That’s where most people fuck up on drugs. It’s the greed involved that never really affected me. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 15th, 2010 at 10:29am Exclusive 'Life' Excerpt: Keith Richards on the Debaucherous 1972 Rolling Stones Tour Photograph by © Ethan Russell The 1972 tour was known by other names – the Cocaine and Tequila Sunrise tour or the STP, Stones Touring Party. It was the beginning of the booking of whole hotel floors, with no one else allowed up, so that some of us – like me – could get privacy and security. It was the only way we could have a degree of certainty that when we decided to party, we could control the situation or at least get some warning if there was trouble. Photograph by © Ethan Russell The whole entourage had exploded in terms of numbers, of roadies and technicians, and of hangers-on and groupies. For the first time, we traveled in our own hired plane, with the lapping tongue painted on. We had become a pirate nation, moving on a huge scale under our own flag, with lawyers, clowns, attendants. Echoes/Redferns/Getty For the guys running the operation, there was maybe one battered typewriter and hotel or street phones to run a North American tour through 30 cities. A feat of organization on the part of our new tour manager, Peter Rudge, a four-star general among the anarchists. We never missed a show, though we came near it. The guy that opened for us, in almost every city, was Stevie Wonder, and he was barely 22. Photograph by © Peter Webb The traveling physician we’ll call Dr. Bill, to give it a Burroughsian ring. His specialty was billed as emergency medicine. Mick, who was getting appropriately nervous about people trying to get at him – there were threats and there were freaks fixated on him; people would walk up and hit him; the Angels wanted him dead – wanted a doctor around who could keep him alive if he got shot onstage. Dr. Bill was there, however, primarily for the pussy. And being quite a young, good-looking doctor, he got plenty. Photograph by © Eddie Kramer He printed these cards, “Dr. Bill,” as it were, “Physician of the Rolling Stones.” He would scout the audience before we went on and give out 20 or 30 of those cards to the most foxy, beautiful girls, even if they were with a guy. He wrote on the back the name of our hotel, the suite number to call. He was into getting laid every night. And he also had this case of every kind of substance, Demerol, anything you wanted. He could write scripts in every city. We used to send chicks to his room and take his medicine bag. There would be a line waiting in the room with a waste bag of syringes while he was giving out the Demerol. Photograph by © David Montgomery In Chicago, there was an acute shortage of hotel rooms, so Hugh Hefner thought it would be a laugh to invite some of us to stay in the Playboy Mansion. I think he regretted it. Hugh Hefner, what a nut. We’ve worked the lowest pimps to the highest, the highest being Hefner. He threw the place open for the Stones, and we were there for over a week. And it’s all plunges in the sauna, and the Bunnies, and basically it’s a whorehouse, which I really don’t like. The memory, however, is very, very hazy. I know we did have some fun there. I know we ripped it up. Hefner had been shot at just before our visit, and the place resembled the state house of some Caribbean dictatorship, with heavily armed security everywhere. Photograph by Jan Persson/Redferns/Getty We had the doc there, and we’d get in one of the Bunnies for him. The deal was “We get free dibs on your bag and you can have Debbie.” I felt the script had been written, play it to the hilt. Bobby [Keys, the Stones saxophone player] and I played it a little far when we set fire to the bathroom. Well, we didn’t, the dope did. Not our fault. Bobby and I were just sitting in the john, comfortable, nice john, sitting on the floor, and we’ve got the doc’s bag and we’re just smorgasbording. “I wonder what these do?” Bong. And at a certain point . . . talk about hazy, or foggy, Bobby says, “It’s smoky in here.” And I’m looking at Bobby and can’t see him. And the drapes are smoldering away; everything was just about to go off big-time. To the point where I can’t see him, he’s disappeared in this fog. Photograph by © Peter Webb “Yes, I guess it is a bit smoky in here.” It was a really delayed reaction. And then suddenly a flurry at the door and the fire alarms start going, beep beep beep. “What’s that noise, Bob?” “I don’t know. Should we open the window?” Someone shouts through the door, “Are you all right?” “Oh, yeah, we’re fucking great, man.” So he just turns away, and we don’t know exactly what to do. Maybe if we’re quiet and walk out and we pay for the reconstruction? And then a little later there was a thumping on the door, waiters and guys in black suits bringing buckets of water. They get the door open and we’re sitting on the floor, our pupils very pinned. I said, “We could have done that ourselves. How dare you burst in on our private affair?” The Exile lineup (except for Charlie), 1972. Left to right: Mick Jagger, Mick Taylor, Bill Wyman, Nicky Hopkins, Bobby Keys, me. Photograph by Annie Lebovitz Hugh decamped soon after that and moved to L.A. Some of my most outrageous nights I can only believe actually happened because of corroborating evidence. No wonder I’m famous for partying! The ultimate party, if it’s any good, you can’t remember it. You get these brief vignettes of what you did. “Oh, you don’t remember shooting the gun? Pull up the carpet, look at those holes, man.” I feel a bit of shame and embarrassment. “You can’t remember that? When you got your dick out, swinging from the chandelier, anybody up for grabs, wrap it in a five-pound note?” Nope, don’t remember a thing about it. Photograph by © Ethan Russell It’s not only the high quality of drugs I had that I attribute my survival to. I was very meticulous about how much I took. I’d never put more in to get a little higher. That’s where most people fuck up on drugs. It’s the greed involved that never really affected me. Text and photos from the book LIFE by Keith Richards with James Fox. Copyright © 2010 Rolling Stone I Feel Like Reading... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Oct 15th, 2010 at 11:17am
Thanks LSS, that book is going be a treat to read.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 15th, 2010 at 11:51am
Thanks to Steel Wheels for posting and Lefty for including pics.LOL. Yeah this is going to be a good read. :wtf1
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 15th, 2010 at 11:55am Great shots from today's issue of The Times: Phil Fisk The interview that accompanies those photos can be read by on-line subscribers only. The Daily Mail nicked a few of the juicier tidbits, though... ::) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Oct 15th, 2010 at 2:17pm
A Billboard online article I just found:
Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards says in his new autobiography that Mick Jagger became unbearable over the years and reveals he also calls the imperious lead singer "Your Majesty" and "Brenda." The memoir is peppered with references to other celebrities -- from Johnny Depp to John Lennon -- but it is the prickly dynamic between Richards and Jagger that dominates the 527-page book, which is to be serialized in The Times newspaper. Richards, 66, who met Jagger at the age of four, says he has not stepped foot in Jagger's dressing room in 20 years. "It was the beginning of the Eighties when Mick started to become unbearable," Richards writes in the memoir, "Life," which brought him an advance of 4.8 million pounds ($7.7 million) after a massive bidding war among publishers. Richards and Jagger were two of the Stones' founding members in 1962 and wrote its hit songs, leading the group to sales of more than 200 million albums worldwide. "Sometimes I think: 'I miss my friend,'" Richards writes. "I wonder: 'where did he go?'" But Richards told the Times that his bandmate had read the book and wanted to take out only one thing -- a reference to Jagger using a voice coach. Richards refused, saying: "I'm trying to say the truth here." He added about Jagger: "We've had our beefs but, hey, who doesn't? You try and keep something together for 50 years," adding the band was considering going on tour again. "I think it's going to happen. I've had a chat with ... Her Majesty. Brenda." The band's last tour ended in August 2007, sparking the customary speculation that there would be no more. STAR-STUDDED LIFE Richards is similarly frank about other big names. He said he had long failed to recognize Depp when the Oscar-nominated star had been hanging out with his son for two years. "Then one day he was at dinner, and I'm like, 'Whoa!' Scissorhands!" Depp, who played the lead role in the 1990 movie "Edward Scissorhands," credits Richards for inspiring his character Captain Jack Sparrow in the Pirates of the Caribbean films, and the two are currently shooting the series' fourth installment, where Richards reprises his role as Sparrow's father. Richards also throws in a few choice remarks on the Beatles' Lennon: "Johnny. A silly sod, in many ways," he writes. "I don't think John ever left my house, except horizontally." He describes finding Lennon lying by the toilet, mumbling: "Don't move me - these tiles are beautiful." Richards himself is famous for his insatiable appetite for drugs, although he gave up heroin in 1978 after a fifth drug bust and stopped using cocaine after a 2006 fall in Fiji forced him to undergo brain surgery. He said he does not regret his exploits. "I loved a good high. And if you stay up, you get the songs that everyone else misses because they're asleep," Richards said. During his addict days in the 1960s and 1970s, he spent a decade on the "People Most Likely to Die List." "Well, I'm not putting death on the agenda," he told the Times. "I don't want to see my old friend Lucifer just yet." "Life" is published on October 26. (Reporting by Anna Yukhananov; Editing by Steve Addison) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Holden on Oct 15th, 2010 at 4:04pm
I loved a good high. And if you stay up, you get the songs that everyone else misses because they're asleep.
What a great fuckin' quote! |
|
Title: Richards: Mick Jagger was "unbearable" Post by a.completeunknown on Oct 15th, 2010 at 4:33pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 15th, 2010 at 5:36pm Caitlin Moran Last updated October 15 2010 12:02AM To introduce the exclusive serialisation of his memoir, which begins in The Times tomorrow, Keith Richards talks to Caitlin Moran about the girls, the drugs and his rift with Jagger (and the truth about Mick’s manhood) ) I meet Keith Richards on International Talk Like a Pirate Day. It feels only right to inform him of this. “International Talk Like a Pirate Day?” Richards says, with his wolfy grin, wholly amused. “Arrrghh! Arrrhhh! Oh, I can’t do it without the eyepatch,” he sighs, mock-petulantly. “I can’t speak like a pirate without an eyepatch. Or being pissed — Hargh! Hargh!” But of course, he can: to be frank, everything Keith Richards says is in the cadence of Pirate. With his black eyes, bandanna and earring, even at 67, he has the air of a rakish gentleman forced to steal a frigate and abscond from polite society — due to some regrettable misunderstanding about a virgin daughter, a treasure map and a now-smouldering Admiralty building. You can see why he was the inspiration for Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean. Richards apparently taught Depp how to walk around a corner, drunk: “You keep your back to the wall at all times.” Today, Richards is a pirate in onshore mode. The mood is tavernish. Even though we are in the Royal Suite at Claridge’s, which has a grand piano (“Shall I have a go? You can bootleg it — hargh! hargh! hargh!”) and so many rooms that we never even go in half of them, Richards still brings an air of a man who has left his parrot, cutlass and Smee in the hallway — lest he need to make a quick getaway. On walking into the room he spots me and does a double-take. “I had no idea I was going to talk to a lady,” he says, ordering a vodka and orange. “I need a drink when I do that.” Spotting a packet of Marlboro on the table, he eschews them and brings out his own supplies. “Those are the ones that say they’ll kill you,” he says, pointing at the pack on the table with its large “Smoking kills” label. “They are English, and they would kill you; they’re bloody awful.” “Are they different to American ones?” I ask. “Oh yes. You take them apart, if you’re going to roll a hash joint, and there’s bits of stalk and crap in there. It’s unacceptable to a smoker.” He takes one of his own out of his pocket and lights it. The smell of the smoke mingles with his cologne. “What have you got on?” I inquire. “I’ve got a hard-on — I didn’t know you could smell it,” he says — and then starts laughing again, in a fug of smoke. “That’s a rock’n’roll joke — one of Jerry Lee Lewis’s,” he explains, almost apologetically. “We’re at the Rock’n’Roll Hall of Fame, and Jerry’s got his rig on — frilly shirt and tuxedo — and he’s coming down the steps, and this chick rushed out and was like: ‘You smell great — what have you got on?’ And Jerry says: ‘I’ve got a hard on — I didn’t know you could smell it.’ Pure rock’n’roll.” Keith takes another drag on his fag, beaming. “’Ere,” he says, suddenly concerned, looking at the cigarette smoke. “I hope you’re not ... allergic.” Apologising for a hard-on joke and worrying that a journalist might develop a tickly cough from passive smoking is a long way from Richards’s interviews in his outlaw heyday — he once spent 40 sleepless hours with the NME journalist Nick Kent “pinballing” around London in a Ferrari and consuming ferocious quantities of cocaine and heroin — a cocktail quaintly referred to, by Richards, as “the breakfast of champions”. But then, Richards has mellowed considerably over the years — possibly out of necessity, if one considers how difficult it would be to parallel-park in modern-day London on a 1.5mg speedball. He gave up heroin in 1978, after his fifth bust, and he reveals today that he’s finally given up cocaine, too — in 2006, after he fell from a tree in Fiji and had to have brain surgery. “Yeah — that was cocaine I had to give up for that,” he says, with a sigh. “You’re like: ‘I’ve got the message, oh Lord.’ ” He raps on the metal plate in his head. It makes a dull, thonking sound. “I’ve given up everything now — which is a trip in itself,” he says, with the kind of Robert Newton-esque eye-roll that indicates how interesting merely getting out of bed sober can be after 40 years of caning it. Not that Richards is disapproving of getting high, of course: “I’m just waiting for them to invent something more interesting, ha ha ha,” he says. “I’m all ready to road-test it, when they do.” Richards’s image is of the last man standing at the long party that was the Sixties — and the man who’d invited everyone over in the first place, anyway. During his junkie years Richards spent more than a decade on the “People Most Likely to Die” list — “I used to read it, check I was still on there. I was on it longer than anyone else. Badge of honour, hur hur.” But having spent from 1968 to 1978 with everyone expecting him to keel over in a hotel (“which I never did: it’s the height of impoliteness to turn blue in someone else’s bathroom,” as the classic Richards quote has it), he has now, ironically, gone on to be one of those people we now think will just live for ever. His tough, leathery, indestructible air gives the suggestion that heroin, whisky and cocaine, when taken in large enough quantities, have a kind of preservative quality. Richards has been cured in a marinade of pharmaceuticals. He both exudes the aura of and bears an undeniable physical resemblance to the air-dried mummies of Chachapoyas. “Well, I’m not putting death on the agenda,” he says, with another grin. “I don’t want to see my old friend Lucifer just yet. He’s the guy I’m gonna see, isn’t it? I’m not going to the Other Place, let’s face it.” We’re here today because — having resolutely, persistently and, in many ways, unfeasibly — not died, Richards has finally published his autobiography, Life. When he announced the project, he was subject to a massive bidding war that ended with him getting a £4.8 million advance — acknowledgement of the fact that, barring Bowie or McCartney deciding to write their stories, Richards’s was the motherlode in terms of understanding that most incredible of decades — the Sixties — from the inside, recounted by one of the very people pinballing the psychedelic charabanc off the bounds of “decent” society. “Have you read it?” he asks — trying to look casual, but unable to suppress an incongruous note of eagerness. “Oh God, yes,” I say. “Oh man, it’s a total hoot. Really, really amazing.” “Oh good,” he says, relaxing. “You know, you start off thinking you can spin a few yarns — and by the time you get to the end of it, it’s turned into something much more. One memory triggers another, and before you know it, there’s 600 rounds per second coming out.” “Did you want to write your version because other books on you and the Stones had got it wrong?” I ask. “I read Bill Wyman’s book, but after three or four chapters — where he’s going [assumes dull, priggish Wyman monotone], ‘And by that point, I only had £600 left in Barclays Bank’, I was like, ‘Oh, Bill’. You know what I mean? You’re far more interesting than that; do me a favour. And Mick attempted it once, and ended up giving the money back. It was ten, fifteen years ago, and e’d keep ringing up and going [does Mick impression], “ ’Ere, what were we doing on August 15, 196-somefink?’ I’d be like, “Mick, you’re writing it. I can’t remember.’ And knowing Mick, there would have been a morass of blank chapters — because there would have been a lot of stuff he would have wanted to put to one side, hur hur.” Richards is dismissive of Stones books written by non-Stones — claiming the authors would have been “too scared” to write the truth: “Who’s really going to put Mick Jagger or Keith Richards up against a wall and say: ‘I demand you answer this?’ ” he says, eyes suddenly flashing black. “Because, you know . . .” He takes a drag on his fag. “... you end up dead like that.” The reason Life attracted such a bidding war is because the life of Keith Richards and the Stones is one that — even in today’s modern, anything-goes pop-cultural climate — takes in a still astonishing amount of, for want of a better word, scandal. “Would you let your daughter go with a Rolling Stone?”, the Redlands bust, Marianne Faithfull in her fur rug, “Who breaks a butterfly on a wheel?”, the still controversial death of Brian Jones, the Hell’s Angels running amok at Altamont, the Marianne Faithfull/Mick Jagger/Anita Pallenberg/Richards four-way love-rectangle, numerous arrests, heroin, cocaine, acid, whisky, infidelity, groupies, Margaret Trudeau, riots, billions of dollars, and four decades of sweaty fans, screaming without end. And, at the centre of it all, arguably the greatest rock’n’roll band that ever existed. Gimme Shelter, Jumpin’ Jack Flash, You Can’t Always Get What You Want, Wild Horses, Brown Sugar, Start Me Up, Sympathy for the Devil, Satisfaction — each one with the ability alone to answer the question, “Mummy, what is rock’n’roll?”, and, when taken en masse, the reason why Keith Richards is referred to, almost factually, as “the Human Riff”. For those expecting an explosive story, Life certainly doesn’t disappoint: it opens in 1975, with Richards in a diner in Fordyce, Arkansas, about to be busted for the fourth time. Written like a Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas with infinitely more resources for getting wasted — he is driving to the next gig because he’s “bored” with the Stones’ private jet — it joins him at the high point of his caner years. As Richards describes it, he is the sole long-haired man in a room full of rednecks, and is basically wearing a hat made of drugs (“There was a flap at the side in which I’d stowed hash, Tuinals and coke”) and driving a car made of drugs (“I’d spent hours packing the side-panel with coke, grass, peyote and mescaline”). High on cocaine (“Merck cocaine — the fluffy, pharmaceutical blow”, as he describes it, lovingly), Richards is arrested, dragged to the courthouse and becomes the centre of an international news incident (“There were 5,000 Stones fans outside the courthouse”) — until Jagger sweet-talks the local governor and bails him out. “Mick was always good with the locals,” Richards writes, half-admiringly, half-condescendingly — like a pirate captain commending a handsome cabin-boy who has the ability to “talk posh” to the gentry. The following 527 pages scarcely let up from there. Things tail off in the mid-Eighties — as they invariably do in the stories of Sixties icons. By then they have retired from the eye of the storm to their mansions and are merely watching Madonna from the sidelines, puzzled. But the first half of Life, up until 1984, is in a league of its own. As rock memoirs go, only Bob Dylan’s imperial, awe-inspiring Chronicles can beat it. Sitting in Richards’s agent’s office, reading it — the secrecy around it is immense; I have to sign confidentiality agreements before I can even see the manuscript — was like getting into a Tardis and being witness to events only previously recounted by hearsay. One of the first stories is one of the most amazing — Richards quoting from a letter he sent his aunt in 1961: “This morning on Dartford station a guy I knew at primary school came up to me. He’s got every record Chuck Berry ever made. He is called Mick Jagger.” It’s like discovering Cleopatra’s page-a-day diary and the entry: “Tuesday, 4.30pm: meeting with Mark Antony.” And so it goes on from there — recruiting all the Stones one by one, Bill Wyman sighingly tolerated because he has a better amp than anyone else. They work hard, but it comes ridiculously easy: the first song they ever write together — locked in the kitchen by their manager until they come up with something — is As Tears Go By, which both goes to No 1 and bags Jagger the beautiful Marianne Faithfull as a girlfriend. They buy houses. They buy drugs. Here’s the Redlands bust, recounted by the man who owned the house: casually mentioning another guest — David Schidermann, the acid dealer. As the inventor of both Strawberry Fields acid and Purple Haze acid, Schidermann dosed the charts with two of the greatest psychedelic singles ever made. Richards can tell us the Faithfull/ Mars Bar story is a myth — but adds, casually, that he was the man who left a Mars Bar on the coffee table, as a snack, for when he was stoned. Here’s John Lennon — “Johnny. A silly sod, in many ways” — coming round with Yoko and keeling over in the bathroom. “I don’t think John ever left my house, except horizontally,” Richards sighs, having found Lennon — godhead for a generation — lying by the toilet, murmuring, “Don’t move me — these tiles are beautiful”. On another night with Lennon, Richards tries to explain to him where the Beatles — the f***ing Beatles! — have been going wrong all these years: “You wear your guitar too high. It’s not a violin. No wonder you don’t swing. No wonder you can rock, but not roll.” Redlands burns to the ground, and Richards — high — escapes with only “a cutlass, and a box of goodies. F*** the passports.” Allen Ginsberg — the high priest of beatnik — is regarded as a bit of a twat: coming over to Richards’s house, he “plays a concertina and makes ‘Ommmmmm’ sounds,” as Richards relates, still sounding beleaguered by an unwelcome house guest 30 years later. Brian Jones is dismissed as little more than “a wife-beater”. In this rollercoaster blur, Altamont — where the Hell’s Angels, high on LSD and speed, stab Meredith Hunter to death — is merely an incidental point. For generations of lazy documentary makers, it has been seen as the point when the Sixties turned sour, the moment that flower power idealism died, the undeniable beginning of the darkness. To the man on stage at the time, however, playing Under My Thumb as Hunter dies, it’s a story that merits little more than two paragraphs. The first Stones fan to die had been back in the mid-1960s — plunging from the balcony of the hall. By 1969 Richards had seen it all. He couldn’t be surprised by anything. But for all the drugs, car chases, jets, stadiums, presidents, fist fights and deaths, the core of Life is a small, human, timeless story. The story of Richards’s life revolves around two things: the friend he never quite understands, and the girl who got away: bandmate Mick Jagger, and his former wife, and the mother of three of his children, Anita Pallenberg. Reading Life, I was shocked by how candid Richards is about his relationship with both Jagger and Pallenberg. Indeed, I gasped at two of the stories. My thought, as I read them, was: “Keith Richards, you’re going to be in trouble.” “In trouble?” Richards says, laughing. “Why?” Well, let’s take Jagger. You reveal that your secret nickname for him is “Your Majesty” or “Brenda” — and that you openly had conversations with the other Stones, in front of Mick, referring to “that bitch Brenda”. Your review of Jagger’s solo album Goddess in the Doorway — which you refer to as Dogshit on the Doorstep — is, “It’s like Mein Kampf — everyone had it, but no one read it”. You describe an annoying pet mynah bird as “like living with Mick”. There’s a chapter that starts: “It was the beginning of the Eighties when Mick started to become unbearable.” There are quotes such as: “Mick plays harmonica from the heart — but he doesn’t sing like that”; “Mick Jagger is aspiring to be Mick Jagger”; “I think Mick thinks I belong to him”; “I used to love Mick, but I haven’t been to his dressing room in 20 years. Sometimes I think: ‘I miss my friend.’ I wonder: ‘Where did he go?’” Has Jagger read the book? Richards seems resolutely unfazed. “Yeah,” he says equanimously. “I think it opened his eyes a bit, actually.” “Were there any bits he asked you to leave out?” I ask. He starts laughing again. “Wurgh wurgh wurgh.” It sounds like a crow stuck in a chimney. “Yeah! Funnily enough, it was the weirdest thing he wanted taken out. I mean, look. You know, I love the man. I’ve know him since I was four years old, right. But the bit he wanted taken out was how he used a voice coach.” “Really?” “Yeah! And everyone knew it anyway. It’s been in a million interviews, but for some reason, he was like: ‘You know — could we leave that out?’ And I went: ‘No! I’m trying to say the truth here.’” I pause for a minute. I clear my throat. “So he didn’t ask you to take out the bit about how small his cock is, then?” I ask, in a rather prim voice. “Hey — I was only told that by others,” Richards says, with a wolfish smile and a shrug. This is the height of disingenuousness, because the “other” to whom Richards is referring is Faithfull — Jagger’s girlfriend at the time — and a story that is one of the key “Oh, my God!” moments of the book. Rumours have long circled about just what was going on in 1969 — the year the world’s two most glamorous couples were Keith Richards and Anita Pallenberg and Mick Jagger and Marianne Faithfull. As Pallenberg and Jagger start work on Performance, in their roles of lovers, Richards is convinced that the director Nicolas Roeg — whom he hates — is trying to get the two together for real so that he can have “hardcore pornography” in his film. In one of the most evocatively written passages in the book, Richards describes how the jealousy and fear that he’s losing Pallenberg to Jagger, coupled with his escalating heroin abuse, results in him writing Gimme Shelter on a filthy, stormy day — staring out of the window of his house, waiting for the sound of Pallenberg’s car. It never arrives. She doesn’t come home that night. He presumes she lies in his bandmate’s bed. “War/ Children/ It’s just a shot away,” the guest singer Merry Clayton sings, voice breaking, on what is arguably the Stones’ greatest song. “Rape/ Murder/ Love, sister/ It’s just a kiss away.” Partly in retaliation, Richards then goes about bedding Faithfull. Despite the undeniable dark, fratricidal overtones of screwing Jagger’s girlfriend, Richards’s account of it in Life is recounted in pirate tavern mode, concluding with his joy at having “my head nestled between those two beautiful jugs”. When Faithfull and Richards hear Jagger returning home, Richards jumps out of the window, like Robin Askwith in Confessions of a Window Cleaner, leaving his socks and his cuckolded bandmate’s girlfriend behind him. As a final stab, 40 years later, Richards adds: “[Marianne] had no fun with [Mick’s] tiny todger. I know he’s got an enormous pair of balls — but it doesn’t quite fill the gap.” For a Stones fan, it’s a real double-or-quits moment. On the one hand, as a description of what it’s like to be inside a legendary song as it make landfall, Richards’s recollections of writing Gimme Shelter are without parallel. On the other hand, there is the massive risk that — after reading the chapter — every subsequent listening of the song will be haunted by the image of Jagger’s allegedly tiny todger nestled on a pair of gigantic testicles. It’s one of those side-effects of rock’n’roll that no one ever warns you about. “Well, I did say he had enormous balls,” Richards says now, generously. “I’m sure he’s had worse thrown at him by women. I mean, Jerry Hall pretty much decimated him anyway.” “It does seem like you’re trying to ... wind him up,” I say. “We’ve had our beefs but, hey, who doesn’t? You try and keep something together for 50 years,” Richards says, palpably not caring. There is similar, breathtaking candour in his recounting of his relationship with Pallenberg. In a physically abusive relationship with fellow Stone Brian Jones, Pallenberg has the hots for Richards, and Richards has the hots for Pallenberg. When Jones is taken to hospital with asthma, Richards and Pallenberg end up together in a car, being driven from Barcelona to Valencia. Without a word ever being exchanged, Pallenberg kicks off their relationship by silently unzipping Richards’s jeans and giving him a blowjob. “I remember the smell of the orange trees in Valencia,” Richards writes, still sounding post-coital 40 years later. “When you get laid by Anita Pallenberg for the first time, you remember things.” “Oh — the great blowjob in the car?” he says today, when I bring it up — again, quite primly. “What was your chauffeur doing all this time?” I ask, incredulously. “He’s got to keep his eyes on the road,” Richards shrugs. “I should imagine he was going, ‘About time,’ to be honest. It had been in the air for ages.” Although it was Richards who eventually called time on the marriage, when Pallenberg’s subsequent heroin addiction got out of hand, she still comes across as “unfinished business” in Life — with Richards repeatedly addressing Pallenberg directly from the pages, calling on her to think of what would have happened if they’d managed to stay together, in rocking chairs together, “watching the grandkids”. Although Richards is now married to, and has two children with, Patti Hansen, Pallenberg recurs throughout the book like perfume; melody; a ghost. While Richards rails at Jagger, he sighs over Pallenberg. The girl that gave herself away. Perhaps you keep coming back to Anita and Mick, I suggest to Richards, because as an artist, there’s nothing to say about the people you love and understand. It’s the ones who mystify you that you need to write songs and books about. That’s how you try to figure them out. “Yeah,” he nods. “You’ve got nothing to say when it’s all understood.” It’s the best inference to make — any other suggests that Richards is still a little in love with the woman whose clothes he’s wearing on the cover of Their Satanic Majesties Request. At 67, having come into life-transforming wealth and fame in one of the most controversial bands of the counter-cultural era, it would be easy to assume that Richards became a pirate because of rock’n’roll — around the time the Stones went out on the road, and never really came back: “A pirate nation, moving under our own flag, with lawyers, clowns and attendants.” But the other revelation of Life is that this was how Richards was raised: he has always been a pirate. He describes postwar Dartford as somewhere where “everyone’s a thief”. Dartford, where the highwaymen would hold up the stage to London; explosions from the fireworks factory “would take out the windows for miles around”; and patients from the lunatic asylum would regularly abscond. “In the morning you’d find a loony on the heath, in his little nightshirt,” Richards recalls, fondly. His family were not respectable or God-fearing. They numbered musicians, actors and prostitutes: his mother would “cross the road” to avoid the priest, and divorced his father to marry a younger lover. Richards’s mother, Doris, was a classic working-class matriarch — her last words to her son, as he played to her on her deathbed, were : “You’re out of tune”. And as an only child of a poor, bohemian couple, the only things Richards was brought up to respect were the local library and music. When he got his first guitar, he slept with it in his bed. Twenty years later, guests to Redlands recall Richards’s guitar collection being on every sofa and chair, and being left with nowhere to sit but the floor. So when you come and talk to Keith Richards, this is who you feel you are meeting: not a millionaire Rolling Stone, with houses in Suffolk, Connecticut and the Turks and Caicos islands, but the guy from Dartford who would always have been out of kilter with normal society, however his life had turned out. You get the very strong feeling that this is what Richards would be like even if we were down the pub, instead of Claridge’s, and he had got there on the bus — not least because his bandanna is, on closer inspection, quite grubby, and he’s wearing a pair of shattered trackie bottoms and the kind of incongruously bright turquoise trainers you often see on meths-drinking tramps. Ask him about his daughter — 24-year-old Alexandra — doing a nude shoot for Playboy, and he seems truly baffled by the notion that he could have been disapproving. “You know — my girls are like me,” he says. “They try to avoid work as much as possible, hee hee hee. A bit of modelling is a bit of freedom. Hey, baby — with a frame like that, flaunt it.” The story of how he came to work with Johnny Depp on Pirates of the Caribbean is a case in point. “It took me two years before I realised who he was,” Richards says, lighting another fag. “He was just one of my son Marlon’s mates, hanging around the house playing guitar. I never ask Marlon’s mates who they are, because you know, ‘I’m a dope dealer,’ ha ha ha. Then one day he was at dinner” — Richards mimes Johnny Depp holding a knife and fork — “and I’m like, ‘Whoa! Scissorhands!’ Then I find out he’s an actor, and like one of the biggest Keith Richards fans in the world — and how do I deal with that? ‘Get over it, Johnny.’” Depp and Richards are currently shooting Pirates of the Caribbean 4, in which Richards plays, for the second time, Captain Jack Sparrow’s father — “It takes two hours to put the wig and make-up on. Back into the hairy prison. ‘Ooooh, sorry about my sword, babe,’ ha ha ha.” Filming a bar-room scene, Richards has roped in “a couple of mates. Well, it’s a bar-room, innit?” In between the previous film and this, Depp has been shooting a documentary on Richards, “kinda behind the scenes stuff. Johnny does interviews. Dunno when it’s going to be finished.” He shrugs again. The idea of being followed around by a documentary crew and one of the most famous actors in the world seems resolutely normal. Possibly because of his upbringing — “I’m just a retarded gangster, really. Maybe that’s what I should have called the book. Retarded Gangster” — Richards seems genuinely at ease with his fame. He lives now, as he always has since a child, in a world outside most others’. He doesn’t watch TV (“Lovejoy,” he says finally, having struggled to think for some minutes about his favourite show), exists on old-fashioned comfort food (the book includes his recipe for bangers and mash: “Put the f***ers in the pan and let them rock”), has never voted (“I suppose democracy is the best there is to offer. But for a lot of people, it’s like telling the slaves they’re free. ‘Hey, man — where’s the next meal coming from?’”) and as for when he last travelled by public transport, he wrinkles his forehead and asks, mistily, “Have they still got trams?” This leaves him at ease in the company of other infamous people (“My favourite head of state? Václav Havel. Very impressed with the man. He had a telescope in his office, trained on his old prison cell. He used to refer to it as ‘my old house’. I liked Clinton. He’s a lousy sax player. A little indiscreet, but as a guy — I’d take him on any time. He’s great.” As for Tony Blair: “I wrote him a letter [about the Iraq war], telling him he had to stick to his guns. I got a letter back, saying, ‘Thanks for the support.’” He views the recent imprisonment of George Michael with equanimity and not a little amusement. “Fame has killed more very talented guys than drugs,” he says, sighing. “Jimi Hendrix didn’t die of an overdose — he died of fame. Brian \[Jones\], too. I lost a lot of friends to fame. There’s that bit in the book where I talk about how I cope with fame and say: ‘Mick chose flattery, and I chose junk.’ Because I kept my feet on the ground — even when they were in the gutter. You know what? I bet George Michael is loving it. I say, ‘Stay in jail, George.’ There’s probably some dope and some gays. He probably won’t want to leave — it’s the best place for him. He’s playing around with fame. I can’t remember a song of his. I don’t want to knock the guy, but I’m an immortal legend, according to some,” he shrugs. The implication is that, however wasted Richards got, he wouldn’t have crashed into a branch of Snappy Snaps on something as lightweight as a joint. Richards is a man without regret. When I ask him if — given the chance to do it all over again — he’d start taking heroin, he doesn’t pause. “Oh yes. Yes. There was a lot of experience in there — you meet a lot of weird people, different takes on life that you’re not going to find if you don’t go there. I loved a good high. And if you stay up, you get the songs that everyone else misses because they’re asleep. There’s songs zooming around everywhere. There’s songs zooming through here right now, in the air.” He looks up, as if he can see them, hovering over the grand piano. “You’ve just got to put your hand out and catch them.” During our whole chat, the only time he seems roused to genuine annoyance is when I ask him what I think might be the most amazing question of my entire journalistic career. Thanks to a meeting at a party last year, I am able to say to Keith Richards — one our greatest living rock stars — “Keith. I met Noddy Holder last year, and he’s convinced you wear a wig.” “Not yet!” he says, looking genuinely indignant. “Hey man, what’s his problem with wigs?” “He thinks both you and Mick wear them,” I say with mock disapproval. “Get out of here!” Richards roars. He pulls down his bandanna and shows me his hair — grey, a little wispy, but looking undeniably real. “Hey, Noddy, you know, there are more important things in life than hair. Mick definitely doesn’t wear a wig. I know! I’ve pulled it! What’s Noddy’s problem?” “I think Noddy’s just very proud he’s still got a gigantic afro,” I offer. “Well, that’s about all he’s got,” Richards says sniffily. “Well done, Nod.” Our hour is up. Richards is off to get ready for another day of shooting on Pirates — possibly the most high-profile busman’s holiday in showbusiness. “Any plans for the future?” I ask, as he picks up his cigarettes — still eschewing the British ones on the table. “Well, you know, we’ll be on the road again in the future,” he says, pocketing his lighter. “Yeah. On the road. I think it’s going to happen. I’ve had a chat with ... Her Majesty. Brenda.” And he leaves the room, laughing. He’s at it again. Winding up Mick; doing what he wants; being Keith Richards, for the sixty-seventh year in a row. “I had to invent the job, you know,” he said earlier. “There wasn’t a sign in the shop window, saying: ‘Wanted: Keith Richards’.” And he’s done a bloody good job of it. www.thetimesonline.co.uk |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SoulPlunderer on Oct 15th, 2010 at 6:27pm
Thanks Gazza! I actually liked this article but they pick out like six negative quotes about Mick from a 500+ page book but fail to mention any positives. I thought that was fair enough in this context as Moran was using the quotes to question Keith but the tabloids have unfortunately caught onto these quotes and every hack journalist from the Daily Mail to the Belfast Telegraph to Yahoo and Billboards websites are doing a copy and paste job to make it look as if Keith is only putting the boot in. Typical tabliod stuff but some people seem to get sucked in by it!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 15th, 2010 at 6:47pm
All very nice but it's rather self-serving as someone pointed out, I'd be interested to have his take on WTF he hasn't written a song of interest since...well 1996/1997 for B2B to be kind.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 15th, 2010 at 7:25pm gotdablouse wrote on Oct 15th, 2010 at 6:47pm:
The Times/Sunday Times will be serialising the book over the next few days. Its a subscription only service, but as I happen to be a subscriber I'll copy and paste each one on here. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by PartyDoll MEG on Oct 15th, 2010 at 7:56pm
Thanks for posting the whole article, Gazza! Very entertaining read! Look forward to this book. Somehow I don't think the prose will be as pointed as the utterances from Keith's mouth during an interview! ;D ;D
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by angee on Oct 15th, 2010 at 10:00pm
Well, if you're going to post the serialization, the excerpts, I may have to read them.
Thanks, Gazza! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 16th, 2010 at 5:29am
This is a good time to be a fan. Life is going to be a fun read and we'll have plenty to discuss over the next few weeks and months as we all get into it.
I did some surfing around on other Stones boards and the way I understand it, the October 29th event in NYC will NOT be a traditional book signing where you go up and hand the author your book, which is what I was hoping for. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 16th, 2010 at 8:54am angee wrote on Oct 15th, 2010 at 10:00pm:
Thats actually a fair point, Angee. I realise some people prefer to wait to get the whole thing in book form so from now on the serialised excerpts (and any feedback from them) will go in a separate thread. First extract is up now : http://rocksoff.org/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1287236063/0 and everything else regarding 'Life' (media reports, interviews, book signings or lack of, etc) can stay in this one. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 16th, 2010 at 10:20am Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 16th, 2010 at 5:29am:
Yeah but you still get a signed copy. Probably easier for Keith to do it that way. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 16th, 2010 at 3:44pm
And it's more secure which I totally understand. I just hope I score tickets to this thing and that the book you get with the ticket is autographed. But I had this foolish idea I'd meet him.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 16th, 2010 at 10:29pm
For those who don't have access to RS or who are saving up for the next Stones CD, it's available here for perusal.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 17th, 2010 at 8:32am Life and times of a Rolling Stone: Keith Richards' autobiography Drugs, women and song - as the rocker's autobiography is published, Neil McCormick remembers wild nights with Keith Richards. By Neil McCormick Published: 16 Oct 2010 Rolling Stones member Keith Richards performs on stage at Twickenham Stadium Photo: GETTY IMAGES “My life’s been dedicated to avoiding trouble,” Keith Richards once told me, “so it’s pretty funny how much I’ve run into.” When he laughs, you can hear the years rattling around his chest and throat. Five decades on the edge have made him the living personification of all the most extravagant myths of sex, drugs and rock n roll. He is the Human Riff, the world’s most elegantly wasted human being, rock’s ultimate survivor. Or so the story goes, endlessly recycled in rock magazines and unofficial biographies. “As far as I’m concerned, it’s all Grimms fairy tales,” according to the man himself. Now Keith is telling his own story, in his autobiography, Life (published by Little, Brown & Co on October 26th). It was written with James Fox, author of White Mischief, who has known Richards since the early 70s. According to Rolling Stone managing editor Will Dana, “Keith holds nothing back. It’s funny, gossipy, profane and moving... Outside of Bob Dylan’s Chronicles, it’s probably the best rock memoir ever written.” After a lifetime of legendary debauchery, you might not think Keith could remember much. The truth is he remembers everything, just not always in the right order. I have met him a few times over the years, most memorably when he practically kidnapped me for two days in LA in the early 90s, driving me around in his limo and keeping me talking till sunrise. But the first time I interviewed him, as a young journalist in the 80s, I feared it was a disaster. He was at the wrong end of a bottle of Jack Daniels and was all but incoherent, talking in long, florid quotes that made little sense. But when I got home and listened to the tape, I started to piece it together, jigsaw fashion. I realised I had got a great interview, all jumbled up. Keith glares at the world from publicity stills with the fearlessness of someone who really has “been there and done it”. In person, he’s smaller, looser, paunchier, softer than you might expect. His face is a mass of lines and wrinkles. At times, listening to him talk is like watching a drunk stagger down a corridor: his voice lilts and tilts, his sentences change direction. You’re never quite sure if he’s going to make it to the end, without collapsing. Somehow, he does. The second night in LA, we wound up in his hotel room talking. He’d been up since noon the previous day, and was still going strong at 6am, slumped in an armchair, drinking vodka and fizzy orange, a vile concoction that tastes more of pop than alcohol but has been Keith’s favourite tipple for two decades. Keith made numerous visits to the bathroom, from which he would return curiously refreshed. Whatever he was taking, he wasn’t offering it around, so I sagged in my chair, determined to get the story. And then, out of nowhere, he started telling me a long, funny tale about a house he accidentally burned down in LA in 1978, escaping naked with a woman, not his (then) partner, Anita Pallenberg. It is an outrageous story that hadn’t appeared in print before. When I later researched it, it seemed to be substantially true. I was even taken to the spot in Laurel Canyon where the house had stood. Keith recalled, “everything had burned down, except for one wooden stump of a pillar, and in the bedroom this little portion of a chest of drawers, which had my passport, all my favourite tapes, jewellery, a shooter with five hundred rounds of ammunition. All untouched. And a friend of mine went back the next day when everything else was still too hot to touch, smouldering, and came back with my stuff. So what am I supposed to gather from my life? That I’m blessed? Should I count on it?” The funniest incident from that night was watching Keith struggle with a phone, before instructing his ever present assistant to get hold of his wife, Patti Hansen, uttering the immortal line, “You know I’m no good with phones.” I’m not sure Keith was good with anything, except music. But that is enough. “The rock’n’roll is important,” he insists. “The sex and drugs is just something that happened to me along the way.” Keith lights up when he talks about music, becoming enthused to the point of reverence. Whatever people think about his lifestyle, it is his sense of complete immersion in the grooves and the chords that really defines him. In 1989, he was hailed as a “living legend” at an awards ceremony. “That’s all right,” Richards responded “but immortal is even better.” At times he really has seemed unstoppable. With his lifestyle, few would have bet on him making it to 67. Anita Pallenberg once said she thought he would die onstage. “If I had my way, I probably would,” he told me. “I can think of worse places to croak.” He has defended his prodigious drug intake as a response to the intensity of life on the road, liking it to World War II bomber pilots who had to keep going at all costs. In the past decade, Keith has insisted he is drug free. Not because of moral or heath issues, mind you, but because “the quality’s gone down.” It is, at least, an answer that maintains his defiance. If there is anything more obnoxious than a hardened drug user, it is a former drug user telling people why they shouldn’t use drugs. “I’ve given up everything now,” he claimed in a recent interview, although he was drinking vodka and chain smoking Marlboros at the time. He’s on the promotional trail for his book right now, conducting himself in interviews with his usual piratical swagger. “You only get the truth from me,” he likes to boast. Well, up to a point. His is a truth filtered through a lifetime of anecdotal repetition and distorted by constant self-justification, a truth made up of soundbites. But there was an off guard moment during our long nights in LA, after a video and a photo shoot focussed on his skull rings and snakes head cane, when the hullabaloo had died down, and he whispered something totally unexpected. “I get real sick of the skulls and shit,” he said, with a resigned sigh. “The image thing is a ball and chain. There’s nobody like Keith Richards that would ever be alive. No way. But you can’t buck the image. As long as I don’t have to be that guy all the time, or with my friends. I guess the Keith Richards hard man is something that gives me the room to be who I really am. He’s my perimeter defences.” My most abiding personal memory of Keith is driving through LA after midnight, in a limo, gliding down a deserted freeway. There was champagne on ice, a bottle of 100 per cent proof vodka, a bunch of bananas in a fruit bowl and a woman who seemed to have neglected to put on her underwear. Keith’s assistant found an oldies station doing a Motown weekend on the radio, and Keith was in rapture. He smoked cigarettes, drank Evian mineral water, and rhapsodised about every song that came on. When we reached the hotel after an hour’s drive, he didn’t want to stop. “Just keep driving,” Keith demanded. “Let’s keep driving all night.” The Telegraph |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 17th, 2010 at 8:59am
"Let's keep driving all night."
Right on, Keith. Right on. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 17th, 2010 at 10:55am
BBC1 will be broadcasting a (pre-recorded) interview with Keith by Andrew Marr next Sunday (24/10/10)
The show runs from 9-10 am, although for those of you who (like me) can't be arsed getting up early on a Sunday morning, it'll be on the BBC i-player (UK only) for a week afterwards. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00vm47r |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 17th, 2010 at 11:15am
Life turns full circle for the Butterfly broken on a wheel
William Rees-Mogg Last updated October 16 2010 12:01AM Journalists who write leading articles have to reconcile themselves to the transience of their writings. This applies even to the great authors of English literature. When did one last see one of Samuel Johnson’s essays from The Rambler or The Idler quoted in the English press? If the doctor’s wisdom is forgotten, those of us who are day labourers in the same vineyard cannot complain of neglect. However, it does occasionally happen that a particular article will enter the public’s long-term memory and be quoted a generation or more after it was first published. I have written one such article which is still remembered and quoted 43 years after it was first written. That was the leader I wrote for The Times of July 1, 1967, “Who Breaks a Butterfly on a Wheel”. It owed little to my own writing and everything to the global celebrity of Mick Jagger and the poetic brilliance of Alexander Pope. Jagger and Pope were the pair of seahorses harnessed to the cockleshell of my leading article. The article was concerned with the imprisonment of Jagger on a minor drugs charge. I was at that point still a young editor; I had been appointed only the previous January. The Rolling Stones were still emerging into their peak period of celebrity. I was interested in them as a social phenomenon, but I was not a fan of their music. My own taste in popular music remained that of the 1920s and 1930s, the music of Jerome Kern and his generation. It is a long step from Showboat to Satisfaction, I was not yet 40, but I was already on the far side of the musical generation gap. As a young editor I naturally wanted to reach a younger audience; The Times opened its columns to a broader range of stories with greater youthful interest. We asked what Jagger had done to be sentenced to imprisonment for three months by Judge Block. In the leading article I summarised the charge against him: “We have, therefore, a conviction against Mr Jagger purely on the grounds that he possessed four Italian pep pills, quite legally bought but not legally imported without a prescription.” The tablets were sold in Italy for seasickness. In chemical terms they consisted of amphetamine sulphate and methyl amphetamine hydrochloride. In the leader I took the view that everyone should be equal before the law. I asked the question: “Has Mr Jagger received the same treatment that he would have received if he had not been a famous figure, with all the criticism and resentment his celebrity has aroused?” In the Daily Mail, Monica Furlong had used the word “decadence”, and it was clear that Judge Block wanted to make an example of the Rolling Stones, going beyond the normal sentencing practice. This leader had considerable impact. The Times was not expected to side with the liberty of pop stars against the fulminations of the judiciary. I pointed out that the normal penalty for a technical offence of this sort would be probation. In fact, the appeal court eventually substituted a minor non-custodial sentence. I wrote the heading on the leader, “Who Breaks a Butterfly upon a Wheel”, and left the office, then still in Printing House Square, satisfied that I had made a good case. A sub-editor found that my heading was too long by two letters and altered “upon” to “on”, thereby throwing Pope’s line out of its true iambic rhythm. The line is from what is probably the greatest of Pope’s satires, his ruthless attack on the minor Georgian politician Lord Hervey. The Times then received a very large correspondence, balanced between those readers who were shocked that we should have criticised the original judgment and those who thought that The Times had moved into the age of contemporary reality. Years later, our youngest daughter met Jagger, who said that he was grateful to me because I had saved his career. I was also flattered to read that Keith Richards felt that “we got saved by Rees-Mogg”. The next event was a television confrontation arranged between Jagger and the Establishment. This was held in the garden of the Lord Lieutenant of Essex. I took the chair; the Establishment was represented by an Anglican bishop, a Jesuit and Sir Frank Soskice, who had been a Labour Attorney-General. Jagger arrived by helicopter. I think that this confrontation, which made good television — it is still sometimes shown — was the idea of John Birt, who was to become Director-General of the BBC. At any rate, he was present as a young researcher. It was, of course, Jagger who was the star; he was also the winner in the debate. He handled his case extremely well. The Jesuit, Father Corbishley, recognised that he was dealing with a highly intelligent young man, worthy of serious debate. The bishop tried to patronise Jagger, which was a mistake. At that time the Beatles and the Rolling Stones were in intense rivalry. Each group had its own image, which spread over into political attitudes. The Beatles, coming from Liverpool, were seen as more socialist; the Rolling Stones were more aggressive and radical. In fact, Jagger turned out to be an early libertarian, basing his arguments on those which had been used by John Stuart Mill in his book On Liberty. He argued that everyone has a right to take risks with their own lives, provided that they did not damage other people. On that view, the State has no right to interfere in individual lives unless there is damage to others. One always looks back with some surprise at what one has failed to see at a past time. It is now easy to see that the Beatles were the popular musical establishment of a left-of-centre period. They were in no way a threat to Harold Wilson, who approved their nominations for their MBEs. The Rolling Stones’ appeal was more radical; it was the radicalism that foreshadowed the new individualism. Jagger turned out to be closer to the way that the world developed in the 1980s. He could easily have said that there is no such thing as society. He was not necessarily a man of his time, but of a time that was still to come. His appeal was disturbing, anarchic and dangerous. The Beatles chose to be the good boys; the Stones were the bad boys, always a potential threat to the Establishment. They were the leaders of an individualist and generational revolt against the old order. William Rees-Mogg is a columnist for The Times and was its Editor from 1967-1981 http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article2769754.ece |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 17th, 2010 at 11:22am Stones were saved by article in The Times, says Keith Richards Damian Whitworth Last updated October 16 2010 12:01AM The Rolling Stones would have been destroyed at the height of their notoriety more than 40 years ago if The Times had not launched its famous attack on their jail sentences for drugs offences, Keith Richards reveals today. The guitarist with the world’s biggest and most durable rock band is convinced that the thundering intervention of William Rees-Mogg saved him and Mick Jagger from career-ending prison terms. Lord Rees-Mogg, who was the editor at the time of the 1967 case, wrote a leading article headlined “Who breaks a butterfly on a wheel?” that savaged the sentences handed down to the young stars. Shortly afterwards Richards’s sentence was quashed and Jagger was given a conditional discharge. In his autobiography, Life, serialised exclusively in The Times magazine today, Richards writes: “We got saved by Rees-Mogg, because, believe me, I felt like a butterfly at the time and I’m going to be broken.” Richards believes that the Stones were targeted by an Establishment unnerved by the emergence of rock bands and the new availability of recreational drugs. The trial arose from a raid on a party Richards threw at Redlands, his home in West Sussex, in February 1967. Jagger and Marianne Faithfull, his girlfriend at the time, were among the guests and a large quantity of drugs was consumed. Richards writes that he had been taking LSD and was so confused when he answered the door that he thought the police were a group of identically dressed dwarves. At the trial Richards was sentenced to a year in prison for allowing his house to be used for smoking cannabis resin and Jagger was jailed for three months for possession of four amphetamine tablets. Richards believes that the judge was unimpressed by his responses to the prosecutor, who asked him if it was “normal” for a woman (Faithfull) to be wearing nothing but a fur rug in the presence of several men. Richards replied: “We are not old men. We are not worried about petty morals.” He writes: “It got me a year in Wormwood Scrubs. I only did a day, as it turned out, but that was what the judge thought of my speech — he gave me the heaviest sentence he thought he could get away with.” He adds: “What a ludicrous sentence. How much do they hate you? I wonder who was whispering in the judge’s ear . . . The dark side of this was discovering that we’d become the focal point of a nervous Establishment. There’s two ways the authorities can deal with a perceived challenge. One is to absorb and the other is to nail. They had to leave the Beatles alone because they’d already given them medals. We got the nail. “It was more serious than I thought. I was in jail because I’d obviously p***ed off the authorities. I’m a guitar player in a pop band and I’m being targeted by the British government and its vicious police force, all of which shows me how frightened they are.” Of his brief sojourn in Wormwood Scrubs, he writes: “The whole place is meant to intimidate you to the max.” He and Jagger were released to await their appeal and The Times published its leader, which argued that there “must remain a suspicion in this case that Mr Jagger received a more severe sentence than would have been thought proper for any purely anonymous young man”. The article acknowledged that there were some people who “resent the anarchic quality of the Rolling Stones’ performances, dislike their songs, dislike their influence on teenagers and broadly suspect them of decadence”. However, it added: “If we are going to make any case a symbol of the conflict between the sound traditional values of Britain and the new hedonism, then we must be sure that the traditional values include those of tolerance and equity.” Lord Rees-Mogg said last night that “it was not a leader I expected to be famous as I was writing it. It is very flattering for newspaper power to be used in a way that a long time afterwards one can look back on and feel satisfied with.” He said he was aware that some people with influence “wanted to see them taken down a peg. I genuinely thought an injustice had been done”. In today’s extracts Richards also details his complicated love rivalry with Jagger. When Jagger had a fling with Richards’ girlfriend, the actress Anita Pallenberg, Richards went off with Faithfull. On one occasion he was with her when Jagger returned and had to escape out of a window without his socks. He writes that Jagger’s dalliance with Pallenberg “probably put a bigger gap between me and Mick than anything else, but mainly on Mick’s part, not mine. And probably for ever.” |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Oct 17th, 2010 at 6:37pm
To be honest, I found the extracts and the interviews a little predictable but I loved that William Rees Mogg piece. What a lovely look back on one of the greatest editorial pieces of all time.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Joey on Oct 17th, 2010 at 7:04pm "My most abiding personal memory of Keith is driving through LA after midnight, in a limo, gliding down a deserted freeway. There was champagne on ice, a bottle of 100 per cent proof vodka, a bunch of bananas in a fruit bowl and a woman who seemed to have neglected to put on her underwear.......... he didn’t want to stop. “Just keep driving,” Keith demanded. “Let’s keep driving all night.” Joey like !!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 17th, 2010 at 7:14pm
Patti must have been happy to read about that girl...didn't Keith recently say he stuck by his old lady?...Talk is cheap, eh ?
So is this Keith's latest theory that Mick lost it because he slept with Anita? They still seemed pretty chummy until Keith decided he wanted to have his say again in the early 80s... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 18th, 2010 at 6:29am
Keith is just jealous of Mick, that’s the size of it, says Jerry Hall
Lisa Armstrong October 18 2010 12:01AM It was her first literary festival appearance, but in a week in which even Howard Jacobson’s Booker Prize triumph threatened to be eclipsed by the memoirs of a rock and roll reprobate, it was only right that Jerry Hall, whose autobiography has also just been published, should get to tell the female perspective of being on tour with The Rolling Stones. “Drugs?” reiterated a wide-eyed Hall in response to a somewhat incredulous response from the audience in Cheltenham on Saturday. “I promise I never did them. They frightened me, to tell the truth. When we were on tour and the rest of the band were getting up to whatever they were getting up to, I would go back to the hotel room and get out my needlepoint.” Hall’s abstemiousness did not prevent her from forging lasting bonds with the extended Stones family. “They always welcomed me. What annoys me most about Keith [Richards, the reprobate in question] is the way he glorifies drugs. He always says, ‘Look at me and how I survived because of the great quality drugs I took. Well, look at him — he’s not exactly a great advert for how drugs don’t ravage you.” Hall went on to say that she had not actually read his memoirs. Even so, she seemed up to speed with the salient points. Not wishing to lower the tone too early, I had planned to save matters of national importance — Richards’ slur on the size of Jagger’s manhood — until later. But Hall was ready to defend her ex, with whom she remains on good terms, from the start. “Keith has penis envy. There’s not an ounce of truth in it. They’re always slagging each other off. They’re like adolescents. It was particularly marked when Mick and I first got together because Mick gave up drugs for me and Keith hated that. But they need each other.” Hall has been successful in maintaining an independent identity after her marriage ended but of course she had a stellar career before she hooked up with Jagger. She took herself from Texas to Paris when she was 16. By 20 she was a supermodel. She had struck up a friendship with Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, shared a room with Grace Jones, turned down a request to appear nude in Salvador Dalí film and worked for Andy Warhol’s TV channel. Jagger’s payout to her when they divorced in 1999, thought to to have been around £10 million, was considered by many relatively paltry. “I did all right,” said Hall diplomatically. “Mick’s not mean. But [telling pause] he’s careful with money.” Perhaps the main chapter in her journey to independence belongs to her father, a soldier who served in the Second World War with General Paton, and returned home from releasing concentration camp victims with what Hall now believes was post-traumatic stress disorder. “He took uppers. He was volatile. He would line us five girls up and whip us . . . it was difficult.” Having just finished playing Mrs Robinson in The Graduate in Perth, Australia, Hall has returned to London with a new boyfriend — Warwick Hemsley, a property developer — who sat proudly in the audience. Asked which was her favourite decade, Hall, 54, emphatically replied “now". - The Times |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 18th, 2010 at 6:38am
The Stones defined the Sixties? Gimme strength
Libby Purves Keith Richards’ book makes for fascinating reading, but his rock ’n’ roll lifestyle did not represent my generation I am, with hosts of others, helplessly riveted to Keith Richards’ memoirs, not to mention his amiable old-rock-codger interview last week with Our Caitlin. And there is a joyful absurdity about the fact that the Times leader that in 1967 “saved” the stoned Stones was by the world’s least rock ’n’ roll figure: William Rees-Mogg, pacifically quoting Alexander Pope. Somehow, that alliance bolsters one’s faith in common humanity. However, there is one thing in Richards’ reminiscences that both amuses and irritates, and that is the assumption by him — and his mates — that their particular style of life and attitude said it for all their peers. Rather than just being stimulating musicians and entertainers, the latest crop of artists in a changing culture, they thought they were a zeitgeist personified, the pattern and image of a whole generation. When the judge peered at Richards and asked whether it was normal for a young girl to be wearing only a fur rug in the presence of eight men, “two of whom were hangers-on and one a Moroccan servant” our hero replied haughtily “We are not old men. We are not worried about petty morals”. When in 1967 the hilarious World in Action interview took place between Mick Jagger and a panel of a Bishop, Jesuit, Attorney-General and Times editor (enjoy it online, do), Richards convinced himself it was “a scouting party waving a white flag to discover whether the new youth culture was a threat to the established order”, and Mick pouted “you’re living in the past”. Richards reckons that the Establishment was “nervous” of a “perceived challenge ... we were targeted by the British Government and its vicious police force, all of which shows how frightened they are”. Well, up to a point, yes, the Establishment of the time was too much taken in by this nonsense. On that TV interview you see polite, slightly bemused men — not all old, the Times editor wasn’t even 40 — taking Jagger rather too seriously as he drawls half-formed views like a flattened Prince Charles (“one doesn’t ask for responsibilities, perhaps one is given responsibilities”). They listen to his claim that owing to mass communication “this generation is very different to the others”, and refrain from pointing out that cinema and radio were creating international stars for a good half-century before him. Jagger indeed seems not all that bright: he says portentously at one point “this country is working towards complete state monopoly of radio and television” when in fact, in 1967, it was moving in exactly the opposite direction, with a flock of vigorous ITV companies including the one he was being filmed by, and a growing lobby for legal commercial radio, which began only seven years later. Well, let it pass: the poor chap took a lot of drugs. But occasionally it needs to be pointed out that entertainers, and the instant cultural “historians” who excitably comment on them, tend to fall into the trap of thinking that they represent a whole generation. We enjoy thinking that: it makes history feel tidier. But when a modern writer such as Caitlin Moran speaks of “the long party that was the Sixties”, it behoves us survivors — albeit underage at the time — to clear our throats and say “A-hem. Actually, sweetie, it wasn’t really quite like that”. The lifestyle of Richards, Jagger, Faithfull, Pallenberg, Jones and the rest was a privileged minority amusement, just like the inter-war Mitford debutante set, the Bright Young Things of the twenties or the court of Marie Antoinette. The young of the Sixties bought and liked the Rolling Stones’ music, but not necessarily their lives or their views on how to be happy. Note that in a poll of young people over the Stones’ drug prison sentence, 85 per cent said they deserved it. The clothes, the songs, the hairstyles caught on; the instinct to judge and condemn sexual “immorality” slowly and benignly atrophied for plenty of reasons, but the majority of the Sixties generation quietly got on with courting, marrying, learning trades, doing degrees in biochemistry and saving up for Habitat sofas. There were strong counter-currents too: while those patriarchal rockers treated girl groupies as disposable bits of tail, a fierce self-aware feminism was rising elsewhere. While Jagger claimed his only priority as a young man was “to have as good a time as possible”, his exact contemporary Des Wilson was pioneering the housing charity Shelter. While Pallenberg and Faithfull worked their way through the bands’ bedrooms, other girls of their generation were being forced by disgrace and penury to give away illegitimate babies. Rich entertainers are only signposts, and unreliable ones at that. When The Who sang “Hope I die before I get old!” we all bopped happily along but didn’t really hope any such thing. Any more than admirers of Amy Winehouse’s music or Kate Moss’s clothes really want those women’s lives and habits. Only the silliest and most unconfident girls beyond the age of 16 regard Madonna or Gaga as role models. They’re fun images, that’s all: carefully crafted dolls to put away when it’s time for work. Far more typical of any rock “generation” is a wistful wannabe like Tony Blair, who rapidly casts aside air-guitar dreams to qualify as a lawyer, and never goes to Marrakesh to sprawl on a cushion in a fume-filled basement because it could damage his future political career. The Establishment really needn’t have worried so much about the Stones. They were just a nice decoration, a frill on the edge of real life. Of course culture changes, not only in fashion and art but in tolerance of the maverick, and that is good. But generational shift is a subtle, slow, nuanced business. The more generations and individuals you get to meet through life, the more irritatingly simplistic it is to have stars claim to represent them, or to hear cultural commentators shrieking that everything has changed. Face it, Richards — there have been drugtakers, hedonists, and sexual outlaws for centuries. You made more money, from a poorer start, than Byron or de Quincey or the 17th- century Earl of Rochester, because of the record industry. You lived longer than many, thanks to excellent genes. And your music was great. But honestly, you weren’t so very new. And it was boring old legislators, campaigners, charities, engineers, scientists and administrators who moved the world on. Not you. Sorry. Rock on, though, Keef: you’re only a daydream in our stolid lives, but we still rather love you. - The Times |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Oct 18th, 2010 at 7:43am
me thinks poor Libby needs a good lay...........
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Oct 18th, 2010 at 8:00am
Still no tickets being released for the Library gig yet. I heard they are moving it to a larger room and there are security issues being worked out. The ticket price jumped to $58 but is supposed to include a pre-autographed book, no signings will be done that day. It's next week so this 'event' doesnt seem well organized, or maybe it's being handled this way purposely so the general public has no chance!
:wtf1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Oct 18th, 2010 at 11:34am Gazza wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 6:29am:
Good for you, Jerry. Keith appears to be very envious and it does nothing but make him sound small and extremely immature, in my opinion. It's his "Life" and only he can tell it - warts and all. I hope he looks as closely at his own personal shortcomings as he does at those around him. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 18th, 2010 at 6:58pm
The Times needs to proofread their work. It's General Patton, not Paton.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 18th, 2010 at 7:01pm
And to say Jerry Hall has her own identy since the divorce is a joke. She has made reference to Mick or the Stones quite a bit since 1999.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by texile on Oct 18th, 2010 at 9:10pm Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 7:01pm:
This book was just a matter of time, Steel. I remember her making a big deal about how she so nobely returned the money for the advance of her book because she refused to dish the dirt. My guess is that the quality of the text was not strong enough for a full-length book. If its anything like Tall Tales, it will read like a teenager's diary. The picture thing was probably more feasible. She's never had a problem dishing when they were together, so why now? The Exile re-release hoopla and success must have been painful for Jerry because it had nothing to do with her. Even when she's defending Mick's privates, and I do applaud her for trying to come to his defense even though it made it even bigger (so to speak), she has to add that Keith was jealous because she got him off drugs, making it about her. I'm more cynical than you Ginda, I think she's on a mission to convince everyone she was the love of Mick Jagger's life, kind of like Keith. Everyone is obsessed with Mick, it seems. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by texile on Oct 18th, 2010 at 9:19pm
I got sidetracked by the Jerry Hall content and missed the Libby Purves article. Interesting take on the Stones outlaw attitude and persona. I love reading about those heady 60s bachanalian days, but I never could relate to them. Purves seems rather prudish, but I think she does hit on something. There was an arrogance back then, a sense of entitlement and a rather childish arrogance toward those not among their kind. I suppose its what makes it larger than life, but it bore no relation to real life as I knew it.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 19th, 2010 at 9:30am As one of the world's most beloved guitarists, Keith Richards is celebrated as much for his lifestyle as his musical genius. Our new exhibition,"Before They Make me Run - Portraits of Keith Richards 1963 - 1972," explores the various sides of this quintessential rock star's life. Opening October 23rd, the show is timed to coincide with the release of his much-anticipated autobiography. Curated by Raj Prem and produced in association with SFAE, the exhibition features the work of some of the world's greatest rock photographers. Included are images from iconic sessions such as Philip Townsend's first ever photographs of the Stones in Chelsea in the early '60s, Gered Mankowitz's moody black-and-white portraits, Michael Cooper's exotic images from Morocco and Joshua Tree, Michael Joseph's "Beggars Banquet" photos, official Stones photographer Ethan Russell's poetic images of the group's infamous 1969 and 1972 US tours, and Dominique Tarle's photos taken during the recording of "Exile on Main St." in the South of France. Additional photographers included are Peter Webb and David Montgomery with their memorable "Sticky Fingers" images, legendary producer Eddie Kramer's intimate recording studio shots with Keith, and Jerrold Schatzberg's photos of Keith dressed in drag. "Keith Richards is the Prometheus of Rock, carrying with him the fire of Rock and Roll from the previous century into the new millennium," says Theron Kabrich, San Francisco Art Exchange co-owner. "Our exhibition is meant to convey the personal, the iconic and the intimate sides of someone who embodies, more than any living artist, the essence of rock and roll on stage and in life. Keith's the real deal - and he never took a bad picture because of his unabashedly honest personality." San Francisco Art Exchange Lots of classic Keef shots... 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 19th, 2010 at 9:49am |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:06am
According to the new issue of the 'Radio Times' out today, there will be a 'Culture Show' special on Keith on BBC 2 (TV) on Thursday, 28th October.
Its not on the BBC's website as yet (probably tomorrow) but the programme runs from 11.50 pm to 12.50 am in Northerm Ireland. It's subject to regional variations around the rest of the UK but it's usually shown around 7 pm and again at around 11 pm in England and Scotland, with Wales & NI just getting the later broadcast. Will post the broadcast times when I get them. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:12am texile wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 9:19pm:
Purves is 60 years old, so I can see what she's getting at as she would have been a teenager in the 60's and there was a lot more to the social revolution in that era than music. Then again, according to her bio on wikipedia she was educated in convents in Israel, Thailand, South Africa and France before she went to Oxford University (which would have been in 1968), so it makes you wonder just how much of the Swinging Sixties in England she was actually exposed to. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:12am Gazza wrote on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:06am:
According to the BBC it's on from 7-8 PM. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:16am left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:12am:
Cheers. Just saw your previous link now. Oddly enough, its no longer on the BBC site. 7-8 pm is also the time this weeks show is broadcast, although thats just England and Scotland. The whole country gets a repeat later on, with regional variations. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:30am CBS Sunday Morning will be airing a Keith interview this Sunday, 10/24. Hopefully they'll archive it for on-line viewing... The Examiner |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:48am gimmekeef wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 7:43am:
I have to agree with her. Of course its not the best forum to say it on, but there is truth in her ramblings. Great music, but the Stones live in another world, its not one for the average Joe. Appreciate the chords, be amused at the stories of wild behaviour, but dont forget to clock on in the morning and do your top button. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 19th, 2010 at 11:12am left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 19th, 2010 at 9:30am:
I hope to go check this out. Unfortunately I can't make the opening night. But when I get back from vacation I'll check it out. The SFAE always puts on great exhibits. Very Stones friendly. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 19th, 2010 at 1:34pm LIVE from the NYPL: KEITH RICHARDS Stephen A. Schwarzman Building, Celeste Bartos Forum Friday, October 29, 2010 - 7:00 PM EDT $58 General Admission (Including Students and Seniors) - $45 FRIENDS of the Library TICKETS GO ON SALE TO THE PUBLIC THURSDAY, OCTOBER 21st at 12noon. FRIENDS PRESALE ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 20th at 12noon. FRIENDS must use their Showclix presale code and their FRIENDS code to get presale tickets on Wednesday, October 20th. SHOWCLIX or 1.888.71.TICKETS $58 General Admission (including Seniors & Students with valid ID) $45 FRIENDS Become a FRIEND or 212 930 0653 * There is a two ticket purchase limit per patron, through Showclix, for this program. * Each ticket purchased through Showclix for this program includes a copy of Life by Keith Richards that will be provided to the patron upon admission to the program the evening of the event. * Print outs of tickets will not be accepted. All patrons are to check in at will-call for tickets. * Ticketholders must provide ID that matches the name on the ticket at will-call to be admitted the evening of the event to be admitted. * There will be no standby line for this event. * There will be no live streaming during the event. "When you are growing up there are two institutional places that affect you most powerfully: the church which belongs to God, and the public Library, which belongs to you. The public library is the great equalizer." --Keith Richards Outlaw, hellraiser, and one of rock music's most gifted and influential guitarists, Keith Richards has forged a life that most of us can only imagine--and often envy. Amazingly he's lived to tell about it, and now this rock Icon has given us the definitive rock autobiography. In Life, the man himself tells about life lived fast and hard in the creative hurricane--from his days as a young boy growing up in a council estate, listening obsessively to Chuck Berry and Muddy Waters records, to joining forces with Mick Jagger and Brian Jones to form The Rolling Stones. With characteristic honesty, he reveals all the highs and lows of rock 'n' roll, from the meteoric rise to fame and the notorious drug busts to the women, drinking, and heroin addiction that made him infamous. In conversation with Anthony DeCurtis, a music journalist, and contributing editor for Rolling Stone, Keith Richards will discuss the storied journey of the Rolling Stones, as well as his passion for books and for history. He will chronicle how he created the revolutionary, high-octane riffs that defined "Jumping Jack Flash," "Gimme Shelter" and "Honky Tonk Woman," his affair with the equally infamous Anita Pallenberg (the mother of three of his children), and the tragic death of Brian Jones. He will also discuss the personal values that have made him a proud, successful father, and a happily married man for more than twenty-five years. From falling in love with his wife Patti Hansen to his relationship with his "brother," Mick Jagger, we follow Keef on the ultimate road trip we have all longed to know more about-- the story of an unfettered, fearless, on-the-edge life lived to the absolute fullest. ANTHONY DE CURTIS has written frequently about both Keith Richards and the Rolling Stones in the course of his thirty-year career as a music journalist, most notably for Rolling Stone, where he is a contributing editor. He is the author of "In Other Words: Artists Talk About Life and Work" and editor of "Blues & Chaos: The Music Writing of Robert Palmer." His essay accompanying the Eric Clapton box set "Crossroads" won a Grammy in the "Best Album Notes" category. He holds a Ph.D. in American literature, and teaches in the writing program at the University of Pennsylvania. He lives in New York City, where he was born and bred. nypl.org Finally. Should be a great conversation with De Curtis. Too bad it won't be streamed. Good luck to those trying for tickets! BTW, no mention of attendees receiving signed copies... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 19th, 2010 at 7:27pm Keith Richards on Brian Jones, Mick Jagger and His New Book, 'Life' Posted: Today | By David Fricke Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images "Memory lane isn't particularly my avenue," Keith Richards says at the start of our conversation about Life, the Rolling Stones guitarist's new autobiography, written with James Fox and out on October 26. "I'm always looking forward. Suddenly you're pulled up short: 'Oh, I'll do the book.' Sure, great. Then you realize what it entails." Richards grins, then slumps his shoulders with mock exhaustion. "I understand more about authorship and the agonies," he adds with a raspy sound that is part irritated growl, part triumphant laughter. For the next hour, Richards — speaking for the introduction to Rolling Stone's exclusive publication of excerpts from Life in issue 1116 — goes back through the process of writing the book, sifting through memories and confronting the roughest terrain in his past: the drugs; his madhouse life with the Stones, on and off the road; and his complex relationship with singer Mick Jagger. What follows are additional passages from that interview. Blood From a Stone Why did you finally decide a book was worth doing? There have been so many books out. Some of them are very good. Some of them ... [snarls] But they have all been done at different times, from different points of view. I thought it was time to pull it all together, at least from my point of view. It was James Fox who laid the concept out, the way he felt comfortable telling the story. Basically, I followed his guidance. James would have to needle me: "What happened with ...?" But when he would ask me a question, it would spring an idea and lead me, via connections, to the answer of some other question he had. It was all kind of disconnected, the way it worked. But that's the way the brain is — especially mine. There are voices other than yours in the book — eyewitness accounts from friends and fellow troublemakers. Your son Marlon talks extensively about how, as a small boy, he was your personal road manager on those hair-raising Seventies tours. Were you shocked or surprised by how others saw you at your wildest and worst? I wasn't, because that's really the way it was. Marlon grew up on the road. It was an interesting experiment. The fact that he's turned into a perfect English gentleman is pretty amazing. But he grew up hustling on those tours. And he was very sharp at it. If you wanted something, he'd be like, "Alright, that's half a dollar." Whether that was a good way to bring a kid up, he was the one who made that choice. He went to school when he wanted to, and we always had tutors and stuff. But he was learning life on the road. It was an interesting education. I wish I had been brought up that way. My childhood was very boring. Not according to the book: Two of the most fascinating characters in Life are your mother, Doris, and your grandfather, Gus. You seem to be a combination of both: her strength and clarity and Gus' bohemian ways with women and music. My mother was an extension of him, in many ways, which was why it was very easy to hang with my grandfather. It was like being with Mum — the same sense of humor, the same music. I could travel between those generations. Your mother had a phrase, and variations on it, whenever you got into trouble or complained about something: "This is life, something we can't fight." Is that where the title of your book comes from? Funny enough, I hadn't connected it to that. Maybe it's like a hand-me-down. But that was basically her attitude. When things got out of hand, or you didn't know what to do, she'd just say "That's life." How much do you think being an only child — having a need to bond — influenced your relationships with the other Stones, especially Mick? With Mick, it was basically music. We had been playmates — we happened to go to the same school for awhile. But it was me seeing him again [on the train, as a teenager], with the [blues] records, that was the bombshell — to suddenly find we were both madly in love with the blues, churning to get to the bottom of this thing. It was the missionary feeling. Forming the band was kind of weird. Because, in a way, it formed itself. You didn't have to do much about it. Through the Past, Darkly You and Mick started the Stones with Brian Jones, and in Life you are frank about Brian's self-destructive flaws. You talk about his importance in the early days, but by the time of his death, any sentiment you had for him is gone. I enjoyed his company, and I tried incredibly hard, in 1966, to pull him back into the group. He was flying off. But my attempts to bring Brian back into focus were a total failure. After that ... [long pause] He did some despicable things. The man was failing. He had been a strong man, but he was wiping himself out. Brian demanded, you have to understand. And in a band like this, you also have to be supportive and giving. Having to deal with his jealousy, with Mick and me writing the songs, when you're working 300-odd days a year — it becomes intolerable, and you can get really nasty about it. I tried to be fair to him. But to be honest, he was a bit of a bastard. And it doesn't surprise me that he came to a sticky end. What was it like to relive your relationship with Mick? You've talked a lot about it in interviews. But this is the permanent record. It was quite difficult. Because the relationship changed so much over the years. It's had its ups and downs, and sometimes you wonder why it was worth it. What I really regretted was when we started to live apart. Mick and I could write so easily when he was next door, or on the next floor. That's when things exploded. After Exile on Main Street, we had to learn a whole new way of being — of putting things together that were so disparate, coming together after several months and saying, "Well, have you got anything?" then working it up. It was difficult — and I'm sure it was for Mick too. If you're stuck together in a band, I could just walk next door in the middle of the night and go, "Mick, I've got an idea." But you also changed. Your drug use became a complicating factor. Our lifestyles changed. Obviously, knowing each other for so long, I understood certain parts of what he was going through. And he understood perfectly well what I was doing. By then, we had been backstage together for years. Everybody knew what was what. At the same time, I was still writing the songs. I was doing my end of it. Was it hard to go back over the wreckage of your drug use — especially the damage on your family? One of the most dramatic portions of the book is when you leave your partner, Anita Pallenberg, because of her own harrowing addiction. I had no intention of leaving the mother of my children. But you gotta believe me that there was no option. And thank God she's still one of my best friends. We've been through the mill. And she admits she could be Vampirella when she wanted. It was tough. At the same time, there is an underlying love that goes beyond all of that other stuff. I can say, "I love you, I just won't live with you." And we're now proud grandparents, which we never thought we'd ever see. That relates, in the same way, to Mick. The underlying love is effected. But it's not sundered. How would you describe the Mick Jagger who comes out at the end of the book? Mick and I are still great friends and still want to work together. Both of us know things about each other — and are still finding out. There is no final judgment on one or the other. To me, it's the miracle of juggling. You gotta juggle these weird things that don't actually come between you, but they are just there. There's no point in me saying, "The Stones have gotta go to work" if Mick doesn't feel like it. It's tiring trying to get everyone's enthusiasm up at the same time. And a lot of times it isn't there. But when it is, it's fantastic. And you have to pick those moments, in order to still be the Stones again. When will that be? Is there talk of something — an album, a tour — next year? We're whispering — I wouldn't say talking. I'm getting hints. And I'm always ready. Mick and I spoke about a month ago in New York. It's at that mumbling stage. But I had some outtakes from the last sessions we did [for A Bigger Bang] and said, "Just to jog your memory ..." So there's interaction. You don't want to push it too hard. Do you feel like the catalyst — that it would be less likely to happen if you weren't so committed to the Stones as a working band? Maybe, in that if there is a hint that they want to work, it drifts to me as a touchstone. Because they know I will say yes. I'm confirming what is already sort of confirmed in their minds. What I hope is that when we take these extended gaps, usually, when we come back together, something different comes out of it. You never know what that will be until you get there, when the ingredients are mixed. Now that you have written a book, do you have any stories left to tell? Well, life goes on. That's the story so far. Rolling Stone Some pointed questions from David Fricke. Hope those whispers become a roar. Soon... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Oct 19th, 2010 at 10:37pm
Presale Tickets go on sale at 12 noon tomorrow. Will try for a pair, got my presale code in an email today! I'm nervous!! Hope my plan of becomming a "Friend of the Library" works! This is the only reason I gave the NYPL a donation!!! A worthy cause I guess. KEEF must of made a lot of money for the NYPL in donations from people who want a shot at getting in to his book signing!!
:interestingstuffronnie |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 19th, 2010 at 11:31pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 19th, 2010 at 7:27pm:
Ah so Keith had more stuff on hand for BB? Can't be too good unfortunately based on what they threw on there... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 20th, 2010 at 11:33am
All I know is I want my $40.00 back from that mother fucking library.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 20th, 2010 at 11:41am Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 20th, 2010 at 11:33am:
Yeah I've heard not a lot of people have had success getting tickets to that. :will-ya |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 20th, 2010 at 11:44am
I'll get it one way or another. Assholes ain't gonna get one over on me.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 20th, 2010 at 12:01pm
Just got my refund. Fuckers.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbled on Oct 20th, 2010 at 12:21pm
Me too I just asked for refund. Because I was on hold from 11:50 am to 12:30 with that shitty music
and nobody even picked up. I was online trying to click that little fkg box for 30 minutes all the while missing critical computer training class which is mandatory for my job and I did it NOT FOR Me but for a friend in new york. so I'm pissed off. I think Keith's management has their head up their ass to think that 1 hour book signing is enough . I don't even want to read the god dam book anymore @#(*&$)@(*#$&)!(*&@#()&*#()i~@()*#&~)(*&)(@&~)(*&#$)(~*&)(*!@&#$(#&@! b% |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Oct 20th, 2010 at 12:33pm
I logged on early, ready with presale code. Shit! No luck! Snowball's chance in hell. and I'm fvcking pissed.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 20th, 2010 at 12:36pm
This isn't a book signing and the books that are being given out aren't signed. I'm sure if they are signed, they would have included it in the press release. 500 seats really isn't enough for someone of his fame.
I'm hopeful that I can get tickets tomorrow, but otherwise I'll be at the Black Crowes show that night. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 20th, 2010 at 12:37pm
Bitch, call and get a refund.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Oct 20th, 2010 at 12:56pm
sounds like you folks are getting the run around......another Ronnie art show????????..hope it all works out for ya's all
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbled on Oct 20th, 2010 at 1:11pm
No on facebook they said the price $48 + $40 friends included a signed book (minimum 2 tickets per call)
so if they sold out in 5 minutes like they say on IORR then I smell a rat watch the ticket scalpers come out on 10-29. BASTARDS have robo-dial. I will try again tomorrow but something very odd about not getting thru at all starting early..... and then...depression set in... :sad Okay I just got this email: Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with us. Due to an overwhelming demand for Keith Richards tickets I regret to inform you that tickets sold out minutes after the pre-sale took place at 12pm on Wednesday Oct 20th. We apologize for the inconvenience if any of you had any problems or received any error messages during your attempt to purchase tickets. The Library set a very small quantity of tickets available for this pre-sale date and unfortunately they sold out within minutes of the on-sale. We would like to welcome you to try again tomorrow at 12pm as the same number of tickets that went on sale today will be going on sale tomorrow to the general public. If you are fortunate enough to get through on-line or over the phone, as a member you still will have the option to choose the discounted price. - - - All non-members will pay the full price of $58.00 plus service fees. - - - Member fee is $45.00 Our Recommendations: If you have a personal computer attempting to get through online at www.showclix.com in our opinion is your best bet! - This line will show you to the event page, click on it and you will be taken to his event page - http://www.showclix.com/event/14754/. - At 12pm the green box at the top right will open up for sale. DUE TO A HIGH DEMAND OF CUSTOMERS DOING THIS ONLINE AND OVER THE PHONE - not everyone will get in, even if you do access it at 12pm. This is all randomly selected through our server. - - If you continue to see this GREEN message below: - - continue to refresh your screen as a spot has not opened up for you to purchase tickets yet. Purchase Tickets Tickets go on sale Thu. Oct 21, 2010 at 12:00pm GMT-5 (EST) ==================================================== Once tickets are sold out this message will post. If you see this message Purchase Tickets Sorry, tickets are no longer available online. - ON-LINE AND PHONE SALES HAVE ENDED ==================================================== Once again we appreciate your time and patience and wish you better luck tomorrow!! Sincerely, Customer CARE ShowClix, Inc. Customer Service: 1.888.71.TICKETS |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 20th, 2010 at 9:12pm
I just got an apology letter from the library. I shit you not.
You know what? I'm too fucking wrapped up in this god damned band. I've spent less on good STONES tickets than what this book event would cost me. It's a fucking reading or something. I'm sure a guitar will be nowhere near the library that night. I got a ticket near the stage for the Black Crowes show in Philly the 29th. I should just go to that and spare myself the anxiety over this Keef thing. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 20th, 2010 at 9:53pm
We would like to welcome you to try again tomorrow at 12pm as the same number of tickets that went on sale today will be going on sale tomorrow to the general public.
Which is about what? 4.... :whydontcha |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Oct 20th, 2010 at 10:49pm
I was logged on at noon and the system crashed, 11,000 people online. I actually got to the part where you put in the number of tickets but then after I clicked it, it brought me back to the beginning and then I couldnt get anything at all. So I decided to phone, and I was on hold on for about an hour. Finally someone picked up and said the very limited amount of tickets were sold out in 30 seconds!
OK, so if 11,000 people paid $45.00 (minimum) to become a "Friend of the NYC Public Library" than KEEF's book raised $495,000.00 for the library! That's awesome! I'm not asking for a refund, some people did but it's not the NYPL's fault, it's KEEF's, his plan sucked. Fvck it. I'm not buying the book. Anyway I dont appreciate the way he humiliates MICK. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 21st, 2010 at 5:08am
To those who didn't get in:
It's Keith FUCKING Richards. What did you expect???? You HAD to know going into this that your chances of scoring a ticket were of the"needle in the haystack" category of odds. A couple of people DID get through. People just like you and me. I understand the disappointment; I DO but to BOYCOTT the book and/or BLAME Keith?? Come on. If you HAD gotten in, you'd each be jumping for joy and praising the Book as the best thing ever. Try again today. Maybe you'll get in. Good luck. LJ. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 21st, 2010 at 8:54am
I'm with LJ on this, this obviously has nothing to do with Keith himself - if you want to blame anyone, go ahead and blame the people who organize this, but Keith himself? :blankfriggingstare1
And Bitch, honey, Mick and Keith live on that. They've been acting like that with each other for the past 40 years! I don't think Mick even takes some of these comments seriously anymore - I'm not even sure Keith means them to be taken seriously. Now, the really sad part? When Keith says he hasn't been in Mick's dressing room for the last 20 years. If anyone's wondering why we haven't had any descent Rolling Stones album for quite some time, there's your answer! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 21st, 2010 at 9:14am Keith Richards, With Memories to Burn By JANET MASLIN Published: October 20, 2010 Steve Pyke/Getty Images It is 3 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time in the New York office of Keith Richards’s manager, a place that might look ordinary if every wall and shelf were not crammed with some of the world’s most glorious rock ’n’ roll memorabilia. Mr. Richards has a 3 o’clock appointment. “Come on in, he’ll be here in a minute,” an assistant says — and here he comes in a minute, at 3:01. This from a man who once prided himself for operating on Keith Time, as in: the security staff ate the shepherd’s pie that Keith wanted in his dressing room? Then everyone in this packed stadium can bloody well wait. The Rolling Stones don’t play until another shepherd’s pie shows up. Chalk up the promptness to the man’s new incarnation: he is now Keith Richards, distinguished author. True, he is far from the only rock star to turn memoirist, and far from the only Rolling Stone to write a book about himself — very much about himself. The raven-haired Ron Wood wrote “Ronnie,” in which he described Brian Jones as “me in a blond wig.” Bill Wyman, the band’s retired bass player and bean counter, wrote “Stone Alone,” in which not a 15-shilling demo disc went unmentioned. Now Mr. Richards has written the keeper: “Life,” a big, fierce, game-changing account of the Stones’ nearly half-century-long adventure. “It’s the most difficult thing I’ve ever done,” he says about the book. “I’d rather make 10 records.” But he sounds anything but weary. And he seems refreshed, bearing surprisingly little resemblance to the battered, kohl-eyed pirate Keith Richards who looks like 50 miles of bad road. Today, in neutral street clothes and hot-green shoes, he is positively debonair. On his hands: the ubiquitous silver skull ring, swollen knuckles, the thin white scar from a hunk of steaming phosphorus that burned his finger to the bone while he played through a concert without stopping. On his head: both a headband and a raffish, straw-colored hat, gray tufts poking out in all directions. Not a single gewgaw hangs off it. “I’ve been through that phase,” he says. “Don’t know that the hair will take the pressure anymore.” He’s been through quite a lot of phases. And they’re all on the page in “Life”: the Boy Scout (really); the tyro rocker; the lovestruck kid (mad for Ronnie Spector, unbeknownst to Phil Spector); the astonished new star; the heroin-addicted older one; the jaded veteran of countless world tours; and the longtime sparring partner of Mick Jagger. (Despite tabloid shock over the bickering in the book, these two have seriously been calling each other names at least since the early 1980s.) All of this is recounted with straight-up candor, and some of it is easily sensationalized. But the book’s single biggest stunner is a hand-written note on its jacket flap: “Believe it or not, I haven’t forgotten any of it.” How, he is asked, is this humanly possible from a man as well known for stupefaction as “Satisfaction?” “I think my main concern at the beginning was whether my memory was really reliable,” he says. “Fox had to do a little sleuthing.” Fox is James Fox, the journalist and author of “White Mischief,” who has been Mr. Richards’s friend over many years and was his collaborator in putting “Life” together. (It was sold to Little, Brown & Company for a reported advance of more than $7 million.) Mr. Fox wound up researching Mr. Richards’s past, conducting interviews with those who knew him long ago and drawing upon wonderfully candid old letters and journal entries. “Spent day practising,” the 19-year-old Mr. Richards wrote in January 1963, when the Stones were just beginning to play in public. “Worthwhile, I hope!” Also exhumed: a 1962 letter from Mr. Richards to his Aunt Patty describing a boy he had known in primary school, Mick Jagger. He signs off “Luff/Keith xxxxx” These artifacts turned out to be the Richards equivalent of Proust’s madeleines, though Mr. Richards, whose reading taste runs to naval history and the novels of Patrick O’Brian and George MacDonald Fraser, would hardly put it that way. In any case they prompted recollections that he never expected to rediscover, and “Life” began to click. Once his stories were told and a draft was written, he and Mr. Fox wound up sitting together with separate copies of the manuscript as Mr. Fox read the whole book aloud. “What I couldn’t guess was that he’d be such a very good natural editor,” Mr. Fox, reached by e-mail, says of Mr. Richards. “He cut, accordingly, for pace and rhythm — a real musical cut.” As for calling the book “Life,” Mr. Richards did some editing there too. “My Life” was what the book was to be called. “I said ‘I tell you what, just cut off the ‘My,’ and you’ve got a title,” he says. He might just as appropriately have used another title he likes, “Keep It Dark.” But, he says, “I’m saving it for a song.” The contents of “Life” are dark enough already. The book begins with a 1975 drug bust in Arkansas and a judge who was persuaded to free Mr. Richards after confiscating his hunting knife (which still hangs in the courtroom) and having a picture taken with him. How did Mr. Richards get so lucky? “I really can’t explain it,” he says, deadpan, about that now. “Maybe I’ve got an honest face.” It covers many other arrests too, as well as Mr. Richards’s grueling efforts to kick his heroin addiction, which he claims to have done successfully 30 years ago. “Stories like this aren’t told very much,” he insists. “There aren’t many people willing to tell them.” Then there are the other health hazards that the book describes. Like electrocution. “My most spectacular one was in Sacramento. ...” he now says with a smile, drifting off into a fond-sounding reverie that involves a guitar string touching an ungrounded microphone and clouds of smoke billowing out of his mouth. He has a good laugh at the memory of finding himself in a hospital and hearing a doctor say, “Well, they either wake up or they don’t.” “Life” has already attracted undue attention for a schoolyard-sounding anatomical swipe at Mr. Jagger. But this is a book that pulls no punches, and most of its disses are more serious than that. “Cold-blooded” and “vicious” are only two of the more printable words he uses to describe Brian Jones. Allen Ginsberg was an “old gasbag.” Mick Taylor, the former Rolling Stone, “didn’t do anything” after he left the band, and Donald Cammell, the film director (“Performance,” starring Mr. Jagger and Anita Pallenberg, Mr. Richards’s longtime lover and partner in crime), couldn’t commit suicide quickly enough to suit Mr. Richards. (He shot himself in 1996.) When Marlon Brando propositioned him and Ms. Pallenberg, Mr. Richards remembers replying with this: “Later, pal.” As for Mr. Jagger, the complaints are deep-seated. They involve credit hogging, social climbing, egomania, insecurity, unethical business behavior and — here comes a Freudian’s holiday for anyone who’s ever watched the bare-chested young Jagger and Richards vamp it up together — uncertain sexual identity. There’s also a cool condescension about Mr. Jagger’s contributions to the duo’s songwriting. And a nasty nickname or two, like “Disco Boy.” In conversation about all this, Mr. Richards is emphatically blasé: “It’s bound to be somewhat rough, but the point is I’m trying to tell the story from Day 1 to now,” he says. And sure: “There’s the odd conflict here and there. But if you weigh it all out, those things count for nothing.” Mr. Richards did see to it that Mr. Jagger knew what was in the book ahead of time. “The important thing to me,” he says, “was that Mick had been through it and seen it and knew what was what.” And is there anything that one Stone can say about another Stone and really give offense at this point? “No.” But is there anything new that can be said about the Stones anyway? As “Life” emphatically demonstrates, the answer is yes. And some of its most surprisingly revelatory material appears in what Mr. Richards jokingly calls “Keef’s Guitar Workshop.” Here are the secrets of some of the world’s most famous rock riffs and the almost toy-level equipment on which they were recorded, like the cassette recorder onto which Mr. Richards dubbed guitar layer after guitar layer for “Street Fighting Man,” “Jumpin’ Jack Flash” and part of “Gimme Shelter.” Here’s how the silent beats in Elvis Presley’s “Heartbreak Hotel” worked their way into some of Mr. Richards’s most inspired solos. Mr. Fox found that “Heartbreak Hotel” itself was the key to some of Mr. Richards’s best musical memories. Some of this is by now well known to music critics. But Mr. Richards makes it fascinating at the layman’s level. And he is surprised to find that early readers haven’t been skipping the musicology, even though the book cordially invites them to do so. What he finds most gratifying about having written “Life” is the chance for both him and his readers to grasp the breadth and range of this book’s material. He is the rare memoirist who can say, without hyperbole, “that what I hoped was worth sharing with people turned out to be far more important than I could possibly imagine.” It’s getting late. Time to leave this bright orange room where Mr. Richards’s name is emblazoned on a director’s chair; where assorted music awards and platinum records are everywhere; where there’s a discreet little skull in the middle of the wall mirror; where his Louis Vuitton guitar case — he did an ad for Vuitton — is parked in a corner. But the items likeliest to catch his eye are the ones on the coffee table: loose cigarettes neatly arrayed in a holder, a lighter, more cigarettes in a pack. “Do you mind if I smoke?” he had asked when he first appeared. Easy one: Who, aside from Keith Richards and certain legal authorities, has ever kept Keith Richards from doing anything? But an hour has gone by, and he hasn’t touched the cigarettes. He hasn’t even looked at them. He has done not one thing to make him resemble the sullen, haunted, diabolically beautiful creature on the cover of his book, the one with hellfire blazing up from his hand to meet the blurry white thing he’s smoking. “That?” he says innocently when asked about the picture. “Oh, that’s just me lighting a cigarette. That’s all I was doing.” The New York Times |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 21st, 2010 at 9:23am Keith Richards appearing at Waterstone's Piccadilly on 3rd November We're delighted to announce that Keith Richards, the legendary guitarist and mainstay of The Rolling Stones, will visit Waterstone’s flagship branch in London’s Piccadilly from 5pm on Wednesday 3rd November to sign a strictly limited number of copies of his autobiography, Life. This will be the only UK signing event for Life, which is destined to become one of the bestselling rock and roll memoirs of all time. For further details please visit the Waterstone's website: www.waterstones.com Orion Publishing Group Best of luck to all those planning to attend. Hopefully you'll fare better than those shutout in yesterday's NYPL debacle. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 21st, 2010 at 9:39am left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 21st, 2010 at 9:23am:
This will be even tougher to get into than the NYPL. :wtf3 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 21st, 2010 at 11:21am
I struck out with tickets again today.
Black Crowes here I come. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Oct 21st, 2010 at 1:44pm
The NY Public Library appearance was obviously part fundraiser. They knew they would drawn in folks from all over the East Coast and have current donors trying to get tickets. And in a bad economy that is one heck of a feather to pull out of your hat! So don't get mad at the library folks. Take the donation for becoming a 'Friend of the Library' off on your taxes and let Uncle Sam pay you back.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ade on Oct 21st, 2010 at 2:01pm
Keith will be interviewed on BBC-2 (UK) "The Culture Show"
thusday 28th October 19.00-20.00 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 9:23am Keith interview with Matt Lauer from TODAY. Short and sweet. Lauer mentions some of the positive things Keef wrote about Mick... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by a.completeunknown on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 9:28am
Hope this isn't already on the board somewhere...
********************** http://drudgereport.com/flash2k.htm DISNEY DILEMMA: CUT KEITH FROM 'PIRATE' MOVIE AFTER BOOK TELL-ALL? Thu Oct 21 2010 17:09:46 ET DISNEY executives are sweating it out as salty details of an upcoming book written by rocker/actor Keith Richards leak and splash. The Rolling Stones guitarist has reprised his role as Captain Teague in the next installment of DISNEY'S 'PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN' franchise. But now executives fear the rocker's shocking admissions in his new book, LIFE, may cause a firestorm and ignite a backlash around the family-friendly Magic Kingdom. Among the concerns, Richards appears to detail how to safely get stoned: Use 'high-quality drugs' in moderation! Richard writes: "It's not only the high quality of drugs I had that I attribute my survival to. I was very meticulous about how much I took. I'd never put more in to get a little higher. That's where most people f**k up on drugs." One well-placed entertainment source explains that Snow White may end up dumping her Dopey! "They very well could end up cutting Keith out of the new movie over this," claims the insider. The book reached #2 on AMAZON's hit list late Thursday. Developing... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by luxury on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 10:32am
"it's a damn good baby" yeah.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Nellcote on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 11:34am left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 9:23am:
Thanks for the link! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 12:08pm a.completeunknown wrote on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 9:28am:
Load of balls. He's only filming his scenes now (or within the last week or two) and its not as if Disney didnt know he had a book coming out when he signed up. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 12:39pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 2:25pm
Waterstones in London, first come first served. Its that great British tradition of queuing.
http://www.waterstones.com/waterstonesweb/pages/200000430/ |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 2:39pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 9:23am:
Thanks for the link. Nice to see an interview that talks about the nice things that Keith has to say about Mick in the book. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 3:24pm
GREAT interview with Lauer.
I'll never be able to put into words what Keith Richards means to me. Thank you Leftie for all of the info you provide to us. Bring on the Tour. LJ. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 3:34pm
If anyone finds another link with Keith's interview, I'd appreciate it if they could post it here.
The link won't play in my area ::) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by zenarus on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 3:51pm
Oh....The Disney executives are realizing who Keith Richards is ?
I don't believe it..Sounds like another hype.. Or they've been living on Mars all this time.. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Holden on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 4:16pm
Great interview on Today. I don't think I've seen Keith be more comfortable with himself and others in the past. Maybe that's why he decided it was the right time for an autobiography?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Paranoid Android on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 4:33pm
I didn't want to start another thread...but this is posted on SIRIUS'-XM's website:
Keith Richards Week October 25 - 29, 7 pm ET Join Little Steven for an in-depth conversation with one of Rock 'n' Roll’s few and true living legends. Eavesdrop as they talk about Keith’s brand new autobiography, Life; his forthcoming compilation release with the X-Pensive Winos (Vintage Vinos); and his work with the Jamaican group Wingless Angels, whose music traces the origins of Reggae. Oh yeah ... you also just may hear a bit about the Rolling Stones — past, present and future! (1 hr) if you don't have SIRIUS XM...or stream it online...you can get a 7 day trial by going here: http://www.sirius.com/getsirius 7 hrs of Keith!!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 6:50pm FotiniD wrote on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 3:34pm:
Sorry you're not able to view the video, Fotini. Keith looked and sounded great! Don't know if your luck will be any better, but it's also available at hulu.com In any event, here's a few screen grabs for you... :) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Holden on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 7:35pm
Lefty, you are far too kind to the people on this board! :smilemick
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 9:43pm Holden wrote on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 7:35pm:
NO FUCKING KIDDING!!!!!!!! We need a Leftie Appreciation thread. There I just started it. Thanks for taking the time to find all the information for us. Much appreciated!!!! 8-) 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 3:58am left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 22nd, 2010 at 6:50pm:
Oh Lefty you're a sweetheart! Thanks so much! The video still refuses to stream outside the US on the hulu link too, but the screen grabs are great :) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by comeoninmykitchen on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 6:40am |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 9:08am Coupla pics - sans chapeau - from tomorrow's CBS Sunday Morning interview. Clip of Keith talking about snorting his dad's ashes is posted halfway down the page here. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 9:23am comeoninmykitchen wrote on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 6:40am:
Excellent. Many thanks. Great to be able to see this interview. I only wish THIS was the sort of thing that tabloids (and a few fans gullible enough to be sucked in by it) had latched on to in the last couple of weeks instead of blowing the anti-Mick angle out of all proportion. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by straycatuk on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 12:40pm
Thanks for the clips and pictures . Keith looks well and sounds lucid (for him !).
sc uk |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 2:24pm
+1
I was also quite touched by the extract in RS where he explains that Mick seemed to be suspicious of all his friends and he's not sure why, possibly to protect him. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by open-g on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 10:54pm comeoninmykitchen wrote on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 6:40am:
Wow! this is just recent? I'm stunned! It's frikkin' great^^ I like that kinda magic - makes our band go another mile when ya tought everyone's died or lost it. Life - it's sure worth livin' and finding out more about it! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 23rd, 2010 at 11:09pm
You know what? We're the inner circle of fans basically. We get what's going on with these guys and why they do things. But from the outside it has to be bizarre. I can only imagine the comments that will be made across America in the morning when Keef talks about snorting his dad's ashes and whatnot. Middle America is going to be highly disturbed. They were a while ago when the story broke and I bet they will be gain tomorrow.
I never would have left that story out into the world. It's a little too odd. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Oct 24th, 2010 at 7:12am
Another new Keith interview here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11615111
Sorry if it's been posted already. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Nellcote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 8:03am
Keith on CBS Sunday Morning which airs now East Coast US, for the next 90 minutes.
Probably towards the end of the show.... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:15am Edith Grove wrote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 7:12am:
Thanks. The interview was only broadcast this morning. The whole segment was about 15 minutes, and the end Andrew Marr mentioned other things they talked about and said the whole interview would be on the BBC's website later this morning - yet this is just a 5 and a half minute edit of what was broadcast. Maybe there'll be more up later. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:17am
Very short on the CBS show...but I did enjoy seeing a few brief shots of his home.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Holden on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:19am
W00t! Woke up just in time to watch the CBS segment. It was very cool, and a bit longer than I expected. Keith sounded and looked great, with the exception of his fingers... I can definitely see how him talking about snorting his dad will make lots of people cringe, but I can understand how it can be viewed as a really loving thing to do as well. TOUR PLEASE!!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:21am
Not sure if the BBC clip works for those of you outside the UK, but here's the full 15 minute broadcast segment from youtube :
Part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjNCEhVmLxo&feature=player_embedded Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqa9S69uRAg |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:25am Nellcote wrote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 8:03am:
Just saw it. Another great interview. Nice to see Keith and his grenade size lemons at the Connecticut Estate! I now have a huge smile on my face. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Nellcote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:25am Holden wrote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:19am:
That was about the best piece I've ever viewed on Keith. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:31am Gazza wrote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:21am:
Fantastic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm in Stones Heaven this morning and I really needed it today!!! Thanks Gazza. LJ. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:34am Nellcote wrote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 8:03am:
Hope someone youtubes the fucker for those of us in the old world! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:35am LadyJane wrote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:31am:
As far as I know, the BBC's 'Culture Show' interview with him later this week is a one-hour special! PS - he appears to be wearing an 'Altamont' t-shirt.... ;D |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Holden on Oct 24th, 2010 at 10:13am Gazza wrote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:35am:
He wore a shirt of himself for the CBS interview as well. LOL. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Nellcote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 10:23am Gazza wrote on Oct 24th, 2010 at 9:34am:
CBS sometimes posts replays of their shows on that show's site, so stay tuned.... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Oct 24th, 2010 at 11:53am
Thanks for the interview. This is a piece from the Observer. Interesting takes. Although I don't totally agree, I think the "no" argument raises some valid points.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/oct/24/keith-richards-rolling-stones-debate YES – Mark Ellen, editor of The Word magazine In 1976, the Rolling Stones played to 100,000 people at Knebworth. They were due on stage at about 9.30pm but an unexplained hitch before the last support act, 10cc, meant they didn't show up until nearly 11. By which time the crowd was exhausted, the set preposterously loose and the traffic jams home the stuff of legend. Three years later I interviewed 10cc and asked them why they were so late. Theirs was a terse, two-word response: Keith Richards. The Stones' loose cannon had "over-refreshed" himself in the afternoon, they told me. He'd been shipped off-site for a snooze. To buy time, the band's blood-chilling road-crew had apparently severed the multi-core cable to the public address system, requiring 10cc's mob to splice it back together again. I can see Richards now, tottering distractedly down the sloping, tongue-shaped stage to create a cacophonous discord. Chaos, fallibility, suggestions of subterfuge. Failure on an epic scale. Except to me it wasn't – to a lot of us, actually. We forgive the old boy virtually everything. He embodies the wayward, theatrical spirit that keeps rock'n'roll interesting. Put Mick Jagger on the cover of a newsstand magazine and watch in horror as your copies stay nailed – and glued – to the shelves. Slap Richards on the front, however, and you'll be feeding virgin pine-forest to the presses for nights on end to supply the demand. Why? Because Keith Richards is a resolutely Good Thing. He attracts envy, appearing to drift through life without effort or responsibility as if frozen in a permanent state of adolescence. The riff for "Satisfaction" came to him in a dream: he awoke for long enough to press "record" on a tape-machine and resurfaced at the crack of noon to discover three bars of lucrative croaks and 29 minutes of snoring. He virtually invented the notion of thick textural slabs of sound that could travel long-distance (the phosphorescent buzz of his amp alone is a thrilling overture to the glorious string-mangling ahead). He co-wrote songs as deathless as "Angie", "As Tears Go By" and "Let's Spend the Night Together". And he smells of purpleness, a powerful scent that's half-booze, half-testosterone and could probably be sold in small bottles labelled "Riff" or maybe "Eau de Keef". It's not his fault that his fabulously gaunt physiognomy has been so widely adopted by Oasis, the Verve, the Charlatans, Johnny Marr and a million others. It's not his fault that people only an eighth as talented think the fast-track to creativity is to eat a skipful of drugs. It's not his fault that legions of pale imitators listen only to the Stones, when the Stones themselves crackled with colour because of the sheer diversity of music feeding into them – Delta blues, R&B, gospel, soul, disco, dub reggae. And it's not his fault that, at 66, he's forced to publicly inhabit a cartoon of what people expect him to be, based on his 30-year-old self, beneath which a far more complex and calculating character can quietly manoeuvre. We want him to act a certain way and, obligingly, he does. When I interviewed him in 1999, he flipped seamlessly into his standard slurred and head-scratching buffoonery, this a man we now know visits art galleries and has a library so extensive he once fell off a ladder inspecting it. I asked him how he'd be spending New Year and he cartwheeled into another harmless fantasy intended solely to raise the sum of human happiness. "I'm going to my bunker," he roared. "I'll get a stash of cash, a few machine-guns, some tinned food, and wait to see if this 'millennium' thing actually happens. Don't wake me until the end of January!" NO – Barbara Ellen, Observer columnist Oh, Keith. Or should that be "Keef"? Keef being the cartoon name for the cartoon man, who once oozed threat, menace, magic, and more than earned his rock'n'roll stripes. These days, though, he prefers shambling around, resembling a stale poppadom with a wig on, mumbling about "heavy shit that went down in 1971". I am weary of hearing how "cool" Richards is, simply because he hasn't died. This has nothing to do with his age (66). One can only respect the way that he and the Stones have continued to prosper in spite of the ageist mockery. My beef with Keef, as it were, is that he has allowed himself to succumb to the worst fate fame can bestow – that of never growing up, thus becoming just another crowd-pleasing sex-drugs-and-rock'n'roll cliche. He's too easily referenced by any dead-eyed supermodel wanting to look "edgy" – but who, if challenged, would probably cite Goats Head Soup as a Heston Blumenthal recipe. The Pirates of the Caribbean movie franchise obviously bought into this, casting him as Jack Sparrow's dad, with Richards displaying an acting style that could only be described as Crossroads-on-Sea. However, one has to ask: is Richards really still the poet-prince-pirate of legend, with (by Richards's own account), some Sir Galahad thrown in? While his memoirs have their moments, the relentless sexism ("chick", "doll", "bitch") soon becomes tiring, as well as creepily (Benny Hill-level) immature. Sleeping with Marianne Faithfull to get back at Mick Jagger he is "nestled down between those two beautiful jugs". The beginning of his affair with Anita Pallenberg is "boinky boinky boinky". On Brian Jones beating up Pallenberg, he muses: "If I were Brian, I'd have been a little sweeter and kept the bitch." Sir Galahad, indeed. The letter to Tony Blair supporting him over Iraq might not be as bad as it looks – in a befuddled moment, Richards might have thought "Tone, the prime minister cat", was trying to pull off some tricky Middle Eastern hashish deal. Joking apart, Richards's constant baiting of Jagger, far from being amusing, hints at a snide disloyal side. The new jibe about Jagger having a "tiny todger" is just low – Richards knew this would go all over the world. Why is he dissing his bandmate anyway? It's arguable that without Jagger's business sense and energy "Keef" would have ended up on a "Where are they now?" list – with all the other rock casualties too out of it to make necessary career decisions. I could end this by rather nastily saying that Keef has become a rambling bore, a human bandanna, who hasn't produced anything relevant for at least 25 years. But I don't want to. The caveat being that, back in the day – his glorious day – Keith Richards wrote some of the darkest yet most beautiful songs ever. Indeed it seems possible to retain genuine respect for Keith Richards, while at the same time feeling dismayed by "Keef" – his mumbling, sexist, childish, cliche-raddled public avatar. If this is what he's like off the drugs, he should get back on them again. It doesn't matter that increasingly Richards resembles a brass rubbing of Bubbles the chimp (you try replacing your bodily fluids with Jack Daniel's for more than 40 years and see what you end up looking like). Rather it's that at some point Keef became the uncool person's cool person. Which just isn't cool. The real Keith Richards would know exactly what I mean. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 25th, 2010 at 8:52am Printed version of yesterday's excellent interview on 'CBS Sunday Morning': Keith Richards Riffs on His "Life" With a New Autobiography, the Rolling Stones Guitarist Is Gathering No Moss, and Getting the Road Itch Again (CBS) Keith Richards has been putting his signature riffs onto Rolling Stones albums for close to half a century. Now at last he's putting his personal recollections between the covers of a book. Anthony Mason has a Sunday Profile: It's sometimes said there are two Keith Richards: "Do you ever feel there's this other guy, the mythological Keith Richards, who's kind of trailing around alongside of you?" Mason asked. "He's, you know, he's on the ball and chain," Richards laughed. "There's an image - it carries a long shadow. Yeah, I love the guy dearly. But I'm still trying to figure out who the hell he is." He is "Keef" to his fans . . . once dubbed the "world's most elegantly wasted human," survivor of countless drug busts. Lead guitarist of the biggest rock band on the planet. And one-half of Jagger & Richards, one of the most successful songwriting teams of the past half century. "How would you describe your professional partnership?" Mason asked. "I've never considered myself or him professional, quite honestly," he laughed. And then there's, well, the other Keith - a very traditional guy. "Yes! That is what I keep trying to tell everybody." That's the one we met in Connecticut, at the house he built 20 years ago to raise his two daughters with his wife, Patti Hansen. At home, he's the 66-year-old guitarist with the green thumb, growing lemons like "hand grenades." "Yeah, it's amazing really, isn't it? This is in my spare time, I do this." But then you realize the two Keiths . . . are really one: "I always planted things. I used to grow weed, but I was never there for the harvest, ya' know?" If Keith Richards didn't exist, one critic wrote, rock and roll would have to invent him. And in a way it has. In his new memoir, "Life," he dispels some of the myths, like the legendary tale he once had a total blood transfusion in Switzerland: "Yes, I created that myth, Because people wanted to believe that, ya know? No, I wouldn't swap this blood for nobody's!" he laughed. And he confirms others, like the snorting of his father's ashes: "True! I ingested my ancestor, yes." It was an accident, he says. He planned to bury his father's ashes beneath an oak tree he was planting: "But as I took the lid off the box, fine bits of my Dad flew onto the table, you know, like powder. And honestly I could not resist. I just scooped him up there, took out a straw and, 'See ya, Dad!' (sniffs) And I did a little line of him. Yeah. I did that. "And the rest of him is around this oak tree, which is growing incredibly well." (CBS) Bert and Doris Richards' only child grew up in Dartford, a working class suburb of London. His grandfather, a weekend musician, loved to take "Ricky," as he was called, to music stores: We took Keith to the Carmine Street Guitar Shop in New York, where owner Rick Kelly still makes guitars by hand in the back room. Keith used to spend hours in shops like this in London's theater district. "And I would just sit there like the sorcerer's apprentice or something, ya know?" Watching instruments being made, repaired, the smell of the glue. "So they'd be like repairing stuff for the pit orchestras, and you'd see those little Italian guys with, you know their dickies or their collars, all of that, rushing 'My violin! My violin!'" Richards would meet another kid with a passion for rhythm and blues at the Dartford train station: Mick Jagger. He wrote about the encounter in an April 1962 letter to his aunt: "Mick is the greatest R&B singer this side of the Atlantic. And I don't mean maybe. I'm playing guitar Chuck style." Chuck Berry? "Yeah, that'll be Chuck Berry," Richards said. A few months later the Rolling Stones were born. Their debut album would knock the Beatles off the top of the British charts. Jagger and Richards emerged as the songwriters. Mick came up with the lyrics; Keith delivered the riffs. "Does this stuff just sort of pop into your head at some point?" Mason asked. "You know, they pop off the fingers actually, more than the head,' Richards said. Keith Richards of the Rolling Stones still has some vices left. (CBS) The Stones swaggered through the Sixties as rock's irreverent bad boys, and the shy Keith became an unlikely icon, with a buccaneering attitude that said he was ready to try anything and apologize for nothing: "I see you're still smoking," Mason said. "How many vices do you have left? You've sort of whittled them away over the years." "Yeah, I'm down to a precious few now." But he doesn’t miss them: "Not really. Because I've done - you can't go back and - I mean, God, I used to love heroin," he laughed. "But what junkie didn't?" Keith seems to be the only one who isn't surprised he's still here: "I have an amazing … constitution. An incredible system, an immune system. And so, you know, I've always known. But it's convincing other people is the hard bit." Richards once said that the reason he took drugs was to hide. "Yeah, it's to get away from the flim flam," he said, "from all of the unnecessary things about show business that seem to be important to show business people, that I never really thought myself part of." Busted repeatedly over the years, Richards once said: "I didn't have a problem with drugs, only with policemen." But he has no regrets. And when asked what was the toughest thing he's faced, he answered, "My son dying. Two months old, I'm on the road and I get the phone call - 'Your son's dead.' That's the toughest thing. I don't really wanna go there too much." In 1976, Tara, his third child with Anita Pallenberg, was found dead in his crib. "You so say in the book you felt like you'd deserted your post," Mason said. "Yeah, supposed to be there, right? But I wasn't there." By the end of the decade, Keith had finally cleaned up his act. But for much of the Eighties the Stones did not tour. Jagger wanted to go off on his own, and Richards felt betrayed. "You were pretty tough on him during that period," Mason suggested. "No, he was pretty tough on me, as far as I'm concerned. I mean, I'm leaving.' You know? 'Oh thanks, Pal.' He had set himself a separate agenda that didn't include any of us, and riding on the Stones' fame to do it. And I thought that was a cheap shot." "In the book, you basically say, 'We're not really friends anymore but we'll always be brothers.'" "Yeah," Richards said. "The reason I say that probably is that we don't see a lot of each other when we're not working." "Do you wish you still did?" "I would prefer us to be closer as guys. But I don't like to socialize the way Mick does. "But," Richards adds, "Mick probably finds me far too serious and idealistic." Mick & Keith - "It's like a marriage, with no divorce," Richards once said. Their child is the Rolling Stones: "There is a certain chemistry between Mick and myself that just clicks," he said. "You don't know quite how. And sometimes it doesn't. I mean, there's many times I think, 'Mick, I've got the greatest riff ever for you.' And he goes, 'Oh, I hate it.'" "Obviously you have to believe in that chemistry 'cause you keep going back to it," Mason said. "Oh yes, I know, I do. My job is to turn Mick on. If I can turn Mick on, then Mick can turn the world on. But something has to spark him." Working on his memoirs has kept Richards at home for much of the past few years . . . and he;s getting a road itch: "I'm starting to feel an itch but it depends who's gonna scratch, you know?" "And you've all got to scratch together, don't you?" "Exactly." Keith Richards is ready to start collecting material for "volume two" of life. CBS News |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by jeff on Oct 25th, 2010 at 9:04am
anybody in the atlanta area know of the best (cheapest) place to find this literary document on tuesday?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 25th, 2010 at 9:19am Advance sales for Keith Richards memoir 'Life' make it an inevitable bestseller Carla Hay October 24th, 2010 It goes without saying that Keith Richards’ memoir "Life" is a bestseller even before its official release on October, 26, 2010. The Rolling Stones guitar legend reportedly received $7 million to write his autobiography. Advance orders for the book have been impressive, although exact number of books that have been purchased in advance have not been released since most book sellers are privately owned companies that do not publicly divulge how many pre-order sales that a book has gotten. More information about sales numbers may become available after the book’s release. Little, Brown and Company (a division of the Hachette Book Group) is the book’s U.S. publisher. Wiedenfeld & Nicolson (a division of Orion Publishing Group) is the book’s U.K. publisher. A way to gauge interest in the book before its release is to look at where it ranks in sales at retailers that post that information online. According to these rankings, "Life" is selling the most at the U.S. operations for Amazon. Here are the sales rankings for "Life," as of October 24, 2010 — two days before the book’s release date. (This information is subject to change.) Amazon.com (United States): #1 in overall book sales ("Life" is also #1 on Amazon.com for biographies and books about rock music.) Amazon.co.uk (United Kingdom): #2 in overall book sales ("Life" is #1 on Amazon.co.uk for biographies and books about rock music.) Amazon.ca (Canada): #435 in overall book sales ("Life" is in the Top 10 on Amazon.ca for biographies and books about rock music.) Amazon.de (Germany): #56 in overall book sales ("Life" is #1 on Amazon.de for biographies and books about rock music.) Amazon.jp (Japan): #85 in overall book sales ("Life" is #1 on Amazon.de for biographies and books about rock music.) The Bargain Book Store (United Kingdom): #6 in overall sales Barnes & Noble (United States): #7 in overall sales Book Depository (United Kingdom): #745 in overall sales Although excerpts of "Life" were published in mid-October 2010 by Rolling Stone magazine and The Times, advance reviews of the book have been scarce. That’s because there was a stricter-than-usual embargo on the media getting copies of the book, according to what a Little, Brown and Company publicist for "Life" told me. Usually, the media get advance copies of a book one or two months before a book goes on sale. "Life" (which is co-written by journalist James Fox) is being made available to select media just a few days before it goes on sale. The book publisher has released the image that is on the back cover of "Life's" hardcover book's book jacket. It is a photo of Richards (circa the late 1960s), lounging in the sun, and wearing no shirt and bell bottom jeans. A hand-written message is written across the photo: "I'm not in this game for the money. I'm here for the insane desire to turn the folks on, to be able to make records. Here's the story. Thanks and praises, Keith." A 20-CD audio box set, a digital download and a Kindle/eBook version of "Life" are also available. The U.S./U.K./Canadian release of the audio CD set features narration read mostly by Johnny Depp and Joe Hurley. Richards is a "featured" narrator in the recordings. The main narrators in the audio CD set vary according to the native language in the country. An audio excerpt from the "Life" CD set has Richards saying: "Believe it or not, I remember everything. So get ready for the ride. It starts with a bang. It starts with a moment when I was in deep trouble. When was I not? When everything — Rolling Stones and all — looked as if it was going to come to a sticky end on a country road in Arkansas. I used up my nine lives long ago, but here I am. I’m still playing. I’m still rocking and still rolling and I survived to tell this tale. And I hope you enjoy it." As previously reported, Richards is set to do a limited number of public appearances to promote "Life." The two appearances that have been announced so far are a Q&A at the New York Public Library's Fifth Avenue location in midtown Manhattan on October 29, 2010, and a book signing at Waterstone's in London's Picadilly Circus neighborhood on November 3, 2010. Tickets for the New York Public Library Q&A sold out the day that they went on sale. For the Waterstone's book signing, wristbands will be distributed to the first 450 people in the queue. The Examiner 'Life' is $16.19 at both amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com Hope the price is the same at the bricks and mortar B & N... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 25th, 2010 at 11:31am The Rolling Stones' Keith Richards Looks Back At 'Life' http://media.npr.org/assets/artslife/arts/2010/10/keith-richards/keith-richards.jpg?t=1287676136 Deborah Feingold October 25, 2010 With his songwriting partner Mick Jagger, Keith Richards created some of the most iconic rock 'n' roll songs of the 20th century. But the opening line of one of The Rolling Stones' most famous hits — "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" — wasn't a collaboration. The riff came to Richards during a dream. In an interview on Fresh Air, Richards recounts how he woke up just long enough to record the famous opening riff of "Satisfaction" on a cassette player he'd placed next to his bed. "I go to bed as usual with my guitar, and I wake up the next morning, and I see that the tape is run to the very end," Richards tells Terry Gross. "And I think, 'Well, I didn't do anything. Maybe I hit a button when I was asleep.' So I put it back to the beginning and pushed play and there, in some sort of ghostly version, is [the opening lines to 'Satisfaction']. It was a whole verse of it. And after that, there's 40 minutes of me snoring. But there's the song in its embryo, and I actually dreamt the damned thing." The 66-year-old lead guitarist has written Life, a memoir about his early musical influences, his time on the road with The Rolling Stones, his run-ins with the law and his occasionally contentious relationship with Jagger, the Stones' lead vocalist. "You think, in a 50-year relationship doing this stuff, that there's not going to be some conflict, some disagreements? Of course there's going to be," Richards says. "...[Jagger] got used to holding the reins, and that was a bit of a shock to me at the time. But I got to live with it. And anyway, actually, what happened is we ended up sharing the reins again. But at the time, yeah, that did shock me, or disappointed me. Shock, I'm beyond." Recently, Richards has made guest appearances on albums released by Willie Nelson and Lee "Scratch" Perry, among others, and recorded several tracks with Jack White. His albums with The Rolling Stones have sold an estimated 200 million copies worldwide, but he says the band has no plans to slow down. "Quite honestly, I think the band wants to play. The boys want to play together, and hopefully we can get on the ups here," he says. "We're thinking ahead. I know, obviously, because of the book, and there's a lot of retro going on and stuff. But as far as I'm concerned, get over it. Get on ahead. We want to make some records, and we want to do some good shows, and we believe that we have it in us to do that." Richards was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1989. In 2008, The Rolling Stones was ranked No. 4 in Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Artists of All Time. A new collection of Richards' solo studio records, entitled Vintage Vinos, will be released on Nov. 2. Interview Highlights On What Chuck Berry's Music Meant To Him "To us in England and to people like Mick and myself, and many other people including Eric Clapton and Jeff Beck, Chuck arrived [with] incredible lyrics and [an] incredible 'devil-may-care' attitude and great records. At the time, we were starving [for good music] in England. We only had two radio stations in the country. We didn't have the dial-twisting. Everything you picked up was secondhand or in a juke joint or a coffee bar or something. And so music, when [people would] say, 'Did you hear that? Did you hear that?' — it wasn't immediately available to you. You had to go search for music. That is what we were doing in England." On Being The Anti-Beatles "If you're talking image-wise, we probably did make a decision to not be The Fab Four. They were basically differences between the bands. The Beatles were basically a vocal band. They all sang and one song, John would take the lead. Another, Paul [would] or George and sometimes Ringo. Our band set up totally differently — with one frontman, one lead singer, and what I loved about it is that there's an incredible difference in it between The Beatles and ourselves, but at the same time, we were there at the same time, and you're dealing with each other. And it was a very, very fruitful and great relationship between the Stones and The Beatles. It was very, very friendly. The competition thing didn't come into it as far as we were concerned." On Groupies "The most graphic is trying a theater in the north of England, and they brought the cops up to try to control the crowd, which consisted of young teenage girls. Everybody rushes through, the whole band, to get in the car. I'm the last one out of the stage door and silly me, I was wearing a chain around my neck and some chick from the left got hold of one side and some chick from the right got the other side, and to cut a long story short, quite honestly, I woke up in the garbage can to see the Stones' car, minus a door, zooming off in the horizon. And I'm just left laying there with half a shirt and a shoe. And everybody just left me. It's crazy." Audio for this story from Fresh Air from WHYY will be available at approx. 5:00 p.m. ET npr.org |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 25th, 2010 at 11:46am Alchemical Secrets of a 66-Year-Old Stone By MICHIKO KAKUTANI Published: October 25, 2010 For legions of Rolling Stones fans, Keith Richards is not only the heart and soul of the world’s greatest rock ’n’ roll band, he’s also the very avatar of rebellion: the desperado, the buccaneer, the poète maudit, the soul survivor and main offender, the torn and frayed outlaw, and the coolest dude on the planet, named both No. 1 on the rock stars most-likely-to-die list and the one life form (besides the cockroach) capable of surviving nuclear war. “I can’t untie the threads of how much I played up to the part that was written for me,” he says. “I mean the skull ring and the broken tooth and the kohl. Is it half and half? I think in a way your persona, your image, as it used to be known, is like a ball and chain. People think I’m still a goddamn junkie. It’s thirty years since I gave up the dope! Image is like a long shadow. Even when the sun goes down, you can see it.” By turns earnest and wicked, sweet and sarcastic and unsparing, Mr. Richards writes with uncommon candor and immediacy. He’s decided he’s going to tell it as he remembers it, and helped along with notebooks, letters and a diary he once kept, he remembers almost everything. He gives us an indelible, time-capsule feel for the madness that was life on the road with the Stones in the years before and after Altamont; harrowing accounts of his many close shaves and narrow escapes (from the police, prison time, drug hell); and a heap of sharp-edged snapshots of friends and colleagues — most notably, his longtime partner and sometimes bête noire, Mick Jagger. But “Life” — which was written with the veteran journalist James Fox — is way more than a revealing showbiz memoir. It is also a high-def, high-velocity portrait of the era when rock ’n’ roll came of age, a raw report from deep inside the counterculture maelstrom of how that music swept like a tsunami over Britain and the United States. It’s an eye-opening all-nighter in the studio with a master craftsman disclosing the alchemical secrets of his art. And it’s the intimate and moving story of one man’s long strange trip over the decades, told in dead-on, visceral prose without any of the pretense, caution or self-consciousness that usually attend great artists sitting for their self-portraits. Die-hard Stones fans, of course, will pore over the detailed discussions of how songs like “Ruby Tuesday” and “Gimme Shelter” came to be written, the birthing process of some of Mr. Richards’s best known guitar riffs and the collaborative dynamic between him and Mr. Jagger. But the book will also dazzle the uninitiated, who thought they had only a casual interest in the Stones or who thought of Mr. Richards, vaguely, as a great guitar player who was mad, bad and dangerous to know. The book is that compelling and eloquently told. Mr. Richards’s prose is like his guitar playing: intense, elemental, utterly distinctive and achingly direct. Just as the Stones perfected a signature sound that could accommodate everything from ferocious Dionysian anthems to melancholy ballads about love and time and loss, so Mr. Richards has found a voice in these pages — a kind of rich, primal Keith-Speak — that enables him to dispense funny, streetwise observations, tender family reminiscences, casually profane yarns and wry literary allusions with both heart-felt sincerity and bad-boy charm. Songwriting, Mr. Richards says, long ago turned him into an observer always on the lookout for “ammo,” and he does a highly tactile job here of conjuring the past, whether he’s describing his post-World War II childhood in the little town of Dartford (memorialized here with affectionate, Dickensian detail); the smoky blues clubs that he and his friends haunted in their early days in London; or the wretched excess of the Stones’ later tours, when they had “become a pirate nation” booking entire floors in hotels and “moving on a huge scale under our own flag, with lawyers, clowns, attendants.” In these pages we meet many different incarnations of Keith. There’s the choir boy and Boy Scout, who was bullied by schoolmates and kept a pet mouse named Gladys. The former art student, dedicating himself like a monk to mastering the blues: “You were supposed to spend all your waking hours studying Jimmy Reed, Muddy Waters, Little Walter, Howlin’ Wolf, Robert Johnson. That was your gig. Every other moment taken away from it was a sin.” And later, the rock star, known for his pirate swagger, who actually remains something of a shy romantic with women, worrying about finding “the right line, or one that hadn’t been used before.” “I just never had that thing with women,” he writes. “I would do it silently. Very Charlie Chaplin. The scratch, the look, the body language. Get my drift? Now it’s up to you. ‘Hey, baby’ is just not my come-on.” Mr. Richards communicates the boyish astonishment he felt when the Stones found the dream of being missionaries for the American music they loved suddenly giving way to pop fame of their own, and their hand-to-mouth existence in a London tenement (financed in part by redeeming empty beer bottles stolen from parties) metamorphosed into full-on stardom, complete with rioting teenagers and screaming girls. He conveys the exhausting rigors of life on the road, even as he captures the absurdities of what was rock star life back in the day: the pharmaceutical cocaine, the impulsive jaunts abroad (“let’s jump in the Bentley and go to Morocco”), the spectacle of the police perched in the trees outside his home. Of the years of living dangerously, when he was zonked-out, Mr. Richards recalls that he slept with a gun under his pillow , turned his 7-year-old son Marlon into his minder on the road and forced all his band mates to live on “Keith Time,” in which 2 p.m. recording sessions had a way of becoming 1 a.m. dates the following day. He writes candidly about how everything began to revolve around “organizing the next fix” — elaborate stratagems, which at one point included buying doctor and nurse play sets at FAO Schwarz — and the difficulties of getting and staying clean. Why did he become an addict in the first place? “I never particularly liked being that famous,” Mr. Richards says. “I could face people easier on the stuff, but I could do that with booze too. It isn’t really the whole answer. I also felt I was doing it not to be a ‘pop star.’ There was something I didn’t really like about that end of what I was doing, the blah blah blah. That was very difficult to handle, and I could handle it better on smack. Mick chose flattery, which is very like junk — a departure from reality. I chose junk.” During the worst of his years on heroin, Mr. Richards writes, Mr. Jagger stepped up and dealt with the day-to-day business of running the band but was reluctant to relinquish his increased control once Mr. Richards returned to action. He writes that Mr. Jagger had begun to treat the rest of the band as “basically hirelings,” and he describes the sense of hurt and betrayal he felt when he read in an English newspaper that Mr. Jagger, then intent on a solo career, had described the Stones as a “millstone” around his neck. Mr. Richards also mocks Mr. Jagger (whom he jokingly began referring to as “Brenda” or “Her Majesty”) as a social climber and swollen head, and says that Mr. Jagger “started second-guessing his own talent” and chasing after musical trends. But while this book’s passages about Mr. Jagger have made lots of headlines, especially in England, they are not all that different from the volleys of accusations the two have exchanged over the years, and Mr. Richards adds that deep down he and Mr. Jagger remain brothers. It’s really less a case of “North and South Korea,” he says, than “East and West Berlin.” Mr. Richards’s verbal photos of other colleagues and acquaintances are razor-sharp as well. He describes Hugh Hefner as “a nut” and “a pimp,” and Truman Capote as a “snooty” whiner. He writes that Chuck Berry was his “numero uno hero” (from whom Richards says he stole “every lick he ever played”) but “a big disappointment” when he met him in person. In another chapter he writes that success turned his former band mate Brian Jones “into this sort of freak, devouring celebs and fame and attention.” In the course of “Life,” Mr. Richards discusses his clashes with the police and his much-chronicled court appearances, as well as all the other headlines generated by the tabloids over the years. But the most insistent melodic line in this volume has nothing to do with drugs or celebrity or scandal. It has to do with the spongelike love of music Mr. Richards inherited from his grandfather and his own sense of musical history, his reverence for the blues and R&B masters he has studied his entire life (“the tablets of stone”), and his determination to pass his own knowledge on down the line. One of this galvanic book’s many achievements is that Mr. Richards has found a way to channel to the reader his own avidity, his own deep soul hunger for music and to make us feel the connections that bind one generation of musicians to another. Along the way he even manages to communicate something of that magic, electromagnetic experience of playing on stage with his mates, be it in a little club or a huge stadium. “There’s a certain moment when you realize that you’ve actually just left the planet for a bit and that nobody can touch you,” Mr. Richards writes. “You’re elevated because you’re with a bunch of guys that want to do the same thing as you. And when it works, baby, you’ve got wings.” You are, he says, “flying without a license.” The New York Times "Mr. Richards’s prose is like his guitar playing: intense, elemental, utterly distinctive and achingly direct." 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 26th, 2010 at 10:25am Keith Richards Delivers a Classic Rock Memoir In his new ‘Life,’ Richards holds nothing back By Rich Cohen Oct 25, 2010 In 1994, when I was 26 years old, I was sent, by this magazine, on the road with the Rolling Stones. The band was promoting Voodoo Lounge, the second album it had released since “the break,” the unofficial split that came in 1987, when Mick Jagger announced his decision to skip a Stones tour and instead go on tour to support his solo album. I spent the first weeks of that assignment in Toronto, where the band was piecing together a set list, picking songs. There were long nights, nasty asides, great music and, now and then, moments of transcendence. Over time, I began to catch glimpses of the constant tension between Jagger and Keith Richards. Before a show in South Carolina, I watched Richards, a cigarette dangling from his mouth, smirk as Jagger went through vocal scales in a nearby trailer. “What can he do there that we can’t do here?” asked Richards, dropping to do five quick one-arm push-ups, the tip of his cigarette burning a kind of signature into the carpet. But it wasn’t until after my story, when I got an angry phone call from Jagger’s assistant, that I came to really understand the steel behind the Stones. “You’ve misnamed this article, haven’t you?” he snapped at me. “You have called it ‘On the road with the Rolling Stones,’ but that’s not right. You should have called it ‘I love Keith Richards and want to have his baby.’” There it was, laid out for me, the essence of the Stones. It’s not just the music, Chicago blues run through the blender, that ignites the band. It’s the play of styles, the push and pull of magnetic forces, the frontman grooving before the riff machine. That’s why there will always be more demand for Mick and Keith together than there will ever be for Mick or Keith apart. And yet, never once, in the entire course of that summer, did I see the men stand together, talk or laugh together. Onstage, in arenas where fans had come to see the spectacle of a friendship as much as they’d come to hear the music, they were in separate orbits. Richards interacted with the band, shouted to the bass player or drummer, while Jagger danced in the ether, in a system of his own. When I questioned Jagger about the rift, he smiled and changed the subject. I asked Richards the same questions: What happened? How can you still work together? He laughed in that deep way of pirates and lifelong smokers. “When you break a bone,” he told me, “you take time, let it heal, then be careful never to break that same bone in the same place again.” With his new book, Life by Keith Richards (with James Fox), the guitarist has broken that bone again, that one and many others. He has opened the old wounds, relived the ancient rivalries, binges, busts, cold turkeys, near-deaths and actual deaths. The book is a chronicle of an era, rock & roll in its golden age, little clubs and struggling bands, studio musicians and recording sessions. It’s a drug memoir, too, among the best ever written, but mostly it’s the story of a friendship, in its first flush, and in its death throes. “I used to love to hang with Mick,” Richards writes, “but I haven’t gone to his dressing room in, I don’t think, 20 years. Sometimes I miss my friend. Where the hell did he go?” The book starts in Dartford, England, a small, glum town outside London, which Richards makes sound almost Dickensian. “Everyone in Dartford was a thief,” he writes. “It runs in the blood. The old rhyme commemorates the unchanging character of the place: ‘Sutton for mutton, Kirkby for beef, South Darne for gingerbread, Dartford for a thief.'” This is where Keith picks up his first guitar (“a sweet, lovely, little lady”), and hears “Heartbreak Hotel” on the radio for the first time. (“When I woke up the next day, I was a different guy.”) Most important, Dartford is where Keith meets Mick, first as boys then again when Keith is at art school, being trained for a career as an ad man, and Mick is commuting to the London School of Economics. This meeting, on a train platform, is one of the mythic encounters of the pop age. Trotsky meets Lenin; Bill Gates meets Paul Allen. There would be consequences. From there, the story unfolds in flashes: first Mick and Keith and friends playing in a tiny club (they call themselves Little Boy Blue and the Blue Boys); then Mick and Keith answering an ad put in Jazz News by Brian Jones (“He was calling himself Elmo Lewis. He wanted to be Elmore James”); then living in the squalor of dirty dishes and high jinks (“Mick had come back drunk to visit Brian, found he wasn’t there and screwed his old lady”); followed by the picturesque hassle of early days (“We despised money, we despised cleanliness, we just wanted to be black motherfuckers. . . .”) – culminating in the rocket ship to stardom. “The Beatles couldn’t fill all the spots on the charts. We filled in the gaps.” Richards carefully explains the process by which he and Jagger wrote all those tunes. It usually started with a riff dreamed up by Richards, a sharp Chuck Berry-like run of chords; Richards would attach a phrase (“Can’t get no satisfaction,” “Wild horses couldn’t drag me away”), then pass it to Jagger, who figured out a melody and wrote the lyrics. Richards never explicitly says that his contribution is the greater one. But he makes it clear where he thinks the art lies. Once the foundation is in place, he implies, the rest is almost busywork. Even when he has something nice to say about Jagger, he gets in a dig: “Mick is one of the best natural blues harp players I’ve heard,” he says. “[It’s] the one place where you don’t hear any calculation.” As you read on, you feel that all those little swipes are about something bigger, grander. Betrayal. Honor. What a friend owes. How people grow apart. Though Life tells so much about the creation of music, the art of guitar, the rise of rock & roll, the pettiness of the legal authorities, it’s really about the way things fall apart. Addiction is the recurring theme – sessions in which Richards did not sleep for days, and he makes heroin addiction sound sensible. How else can you toil 200 straight hours? In one passage, he writes of feeding his habit on the road: “It was difficult in the 70s to get hypodermics in America. So when I traveled I would wear a hat and use a needle to fix a little feather to the hatband. . . . OK, but now I need the syringe. I’d go down to FAO Schwarz, the toy shop right across . . . from the Plaza. And if you went to the third floor, you could buy a doctor and nurse play set, a little plastic box with a red cross on it. That had the barrel and the syringe that fitted the needle that I’d brought. I’d go round, ‘I’ll have three teddy bears, I’ll have that remote-control car, oh, and give me two doctor and nurse kits! My niece, you know, she’s really into that. Must encourage her.’” You can quote a thousand episodes in this book just as great. After a few hours, you feel like you’ve been with Richards when he is hungover and rundown nasty, and with him when he is coked-up and flying. But the very things that make the book so much fun – this is the junkie’s eye view of the world – limit the view the reader gets of the world around Richards. He jabs Jagger again and again (“It was the beginning of the ’80s when Mick started to become unbearable”). But what we never see is what those years must have been like for Jagger – to be in business with a junkie is no easy trick. Richards’ world consists of best friends and father figures, all of whom happen to be junkies; and to any junkie, a nonuser is an enemy, i.e., Jagger. By Richards’ own account, Jagger is always there to come to his rescue. “I have to say that during the bust in Toronto, in fact during all busts, Mick looked after me with great sweetness. He ran things . . . and marshaled the forces that saved me.” Of course, it’s never enough. Richards’ real beef comes later, in the late 1970s, when he gets off heroin and wants to reassert himself. But Jagger had taken control in the drug years and didn’t want to relinquish it. “I realized Mick had got all of the strings in his hands and he didn’t want to let go of a single one,” writes Richards. “I didn’t know power and control were that important to Mick.” The injury was compounded in 1983 when Jagger cut a deal with Sony Music for three solo albums. “The Rolling Stones spent a lot of time building up integrity,” Richards writes, “and the way Mick handled his solo career jeopardized all that, and it severely pissed me off.” But where Richards sees abandonment, another person might see Jagger fleeing a madhouse. The way Richards speaks of his addiction might be fascinating, but it’s probably less so if you were depending on the guy not just for a laugh but for a livelihood. Explaining why he survived, Richards credits the nature of the shit he ingested. “The reason I’m here is probably that we only ever took, as much as possible, the real stuff, the top-quality stuff. Cocaine I got into because it was pure pharmaceutical – boom.” Of course, this is classic junkie talk: I’m fine so long as I get the top drawer, etc. And though Richards does make standard warnings of the don’t-try-this-at-home variety, drug abuse has never seemed so fun or glamorous as it does here. This might be the only celebrity drug memoir ever written that features no redemptive cleanup, no 12 steps, no regrets, no apologies. But the victims of his excess certainly pile up. There is an impressive list of people who partied with Richards and died or just went batty: among them, Gram Parsons and John Phillips, his friends; Anita Pallenberg, his love. Richards takes responsibility for none of it, unaware of his effect on all the would-be madmen who wanted to trade shots with a legend. “The thing with John [Lennon] – for all his vaunted bravado – he couldn’t really keep up,” writes Richards. “He’d try and take everything I took but without my good training. A little bit of this, a little bit of that, couple of downers, a couple of uppers, coke and smack, then I’m going to work. I was freewheeling. And John would inevitably end up in my john, hugging the porcelain. . . . I don’t think John ever left my house except horizontally.” Life is not a standard addiction memoir, because Richards sees his addiction as anything but standard. It’s not a weakness, not a disease. It’s martyrdom. “They imagined me, they made me, the folks out there created this hero,” he writes. “Bless their hearts. I’ll do the best I can to fulfill their needs. They’re wishing me to do things that they can’t. They’ve got this job, they’ve got this life . . . but at the same time, inside them, is a raging Keith Richards. When you talk of a folk hero, they’ve written the script for you and you better fulfill it. And I did my best.” In other words, Richards taunts death so that we can be free. Much of the trouble between Jagger and Richards must come from the simple fact of longevity. They are locked in a partnership that started when they were too young to make lifelong commitments. How would you get along with your high school friends if you still had to depend on them today? Richards, a sentimentalist, cannot help but compare how it was then to how it is now with sadness. “Mick has changed tremendously,” he writes, “only thinking [back] do I remember with regret how completely tight we were in the early years of the Stones. First off, we never had to question aims. We were unerring in where we wanted to go, what it should sound like, so we didn’t have to discuss it.” In the end, it does not matter that Richards is unfair to Jagger or that Richards sees the world through a coke-addled lens. In this book, as in his music, Richards’ real obligation belongs not to Jagger or anyone else. It belongs to the reader, and to the art. At this, Richards succeeds brilliantly. The result is a classic book of rock & roll. Of course, it’s interesting to remember that the Stones are still a working band. This book is not just an artifact, but part of the story it chronicles. So here’s the big question: Will the Rolling Stones, who survived the drugs, death, madness and chaos, survive the prose of Keith Richards? Rolling Stone A very good read. The martyrdom angle is an interesting assessment... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Oct 26th, 2010 at 11:54am
My local Waterstones today.
Photo0006.jpg (Attachment deleted) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by BILL PERKS on Oct 26th, 2010 at 3:34pm
IT'S BEYOND FANTASTIC..BEEN READING FOR 4 STRAIGHT HOURS.
MICK DIDNT SAY A WORD TO BOBBY KEYS ON THE STEEL WHEELS TOUR ! :wtf2 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 26th, 2010 at 3:41pm paul wrote on Oct 26th, 2010 at 11:54am:
Lucky you, Paul. I've had my copy pre-ordered for a month (on that same 50% deal) - and Waterstones didnt receive their consignment today. Very pissed off! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by uncleson on Oct 26th, 2010 at 4:18pm
Life is a great book! I got it through amazon and it arrived about a week ago.
:wtf1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 26th, 2010 at 4:37pm BILL PERKS wrote on Oct 26th, 2010 at 3:34pm:
Having said that, what's the best place to LIFE in the US ? Borders are showing it at $50 with a cheaper version available at $32 on 01/11. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SoulPlunderer on Oct 26th, 2010 at 4:38pm Gazza wrote on Oct 26th, 2010 at 3:41pm:
Haha! We ordered from the same shop didn't we? Fountain street Waterstones? I was raging but I kinda knew when I went in and it wasn't on display. I was wondering why they weren't making any fuss then I realized!!!! I was in kinda early so I foolishly hoped that they just hadn't setthem out yet although it was like 12 o'clock. They said they'd ring me so in gonna be sitting beside the phone all week! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by BILL PERKS on Oct 26th, 2010 at 8:22pm gotdablouse wrote on Oct 26th, 2010 at 4:37pm:
BARNES & NOBLE $22 IN STORE |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Oct 26th, 2010 at 9:15pm
my copy is available at my library... i will be getting it tomorrow... i am hell bent on being a practicing socialist, and using my public library, like a good keith richards fan!!!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 26th, 2010 at 9:37pm
I may be getting it as a gift, but I did run to Borders today to check out the pictures in the book. Great stuff.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 26th, 2010 at 10:18pm
$22 is a good price, but you can't beat free, will check my local library...now !
...ouch : "Your hold queue position is: 13" ! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Brainbell Jangler on Oct 26th, 2010 at 10:36pm
Picked up my copy at Powell's today. Just finished first chapter. Two comments before I go back to reading. First, it was gratifying that the hero of Chapter One was a fellow criminal defense attorney. Second, it was a great read that closed by making me laugh out loud.
Brainy |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Oct 27th, 2010 at 2:15am Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 26th, 2010 at 9:37pm:
Thats the first thing i did, look through the pics. I love the last one, Keith in his library. There's also a nice family one on the sofa, and one with his dad. In that respect its a very conventional autobiography. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Moonisup on Oct 27th, 2010 at 5:16am
a great read:)
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Egon on Oct 27th, 2010 at 5:59am
I have no Life..... :(
yet.... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 27th, 2010 at 6:27am
I'm trying to control myself, but I want to buy the book, take the day off of work, and play every album and just read.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 27th, 2010 at 7:02am SoulPlunderer wrote on Oct 26th, 2010 at 4:38pm:
Yep. Same shop. LOL. Got mine today after a bit of confusion. We should meet for lunch and I'll read passages out loud to you! Looks great - I am now reading it with my penis. Which also looks great. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SoulPlunderer on Oct 27th, 2010 at 7:59am Gazza wrote on Oct 27th, 2010 at 7:02am:
Ok, slightly worried about the whole reading with penis thing but before you seek the mental help you may require, They have it in today?!?! They told me that they'd ring me! Instead of reading passages out to me, you should stand at that ridiculous monument thing at Corn Market where the wee dancers and street performers go and screams out the book at the top of your voice. Get a mega phone and you'll be like all the preachers that used to be on the go in the city! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SoulPlunderer on Oct 27th, 2010 at 8:11am
What was the slight bit of confusion? It wasn't that you said you reserved it rather than saying you preordered it?
I made that mistake yesterday not realizing that the punishment was a sarcastic comment and a dirty look from the women behind the counter. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 27th, 2010 at 8:19am
I have pre-ordered it on Amazon.co.uk along with the audiobook version and the expected delivery date is November 3rd for the book and November 13th for the audiobook :Youmakeagrownmancrylikejoey And I'd been planning on having Keith read to me and following along the book, lol ;D
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by moy on Oct 27th, 2010 at 10:04am Gazza wrote on Oct 27th, 2010 at 7:02am:
:blankfriggingstare1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 27th, 2010 at 12:06pm SoulPlunderer wrote on Oct 27th, 2010 at 7:59am:
Aye, they told me they'd ring me as well....but then I think they're sick of the sight of me calling in every day this week. They had only got three of the pre-ordered copies in, but gave me mine as I'd prepaid in full and had my receipt. Dont worry about the penis remark. It's a long-running 'Joeyism' on here! Have read the first two paragraphs (plus occasional dips into the later pages, as I cant resist). Much better than I thought it would be, and laugh out loud funny. Also, having read the bit about his infant son dying from cot death, quite poignant in parts . |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by BILL PERKS on Oct 27th, 2010 at 12:54pm
I WENT RIGHT TO TARA, THEN READ FROM 1981 FORWARD..GOING BACK ON THE REST NOW.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SoulPlunderer on Oct 27th, 2010 at 2:26pm Gazza wrote on Oct 27th, 2010 at 12:06pm:
Recon I'd be able to pick up my copy tomorrow? I'm gonna try and be disciplined and not dip in and out to the juicy bits but read it from start to finish. May be difficult though... I'm glad yer all enjoying it while I'm not able to get mine until tomorrow. :( |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SendIt2Me on Oct 27th, 2010 at 3:31pm gotdablouse wrote on Oct 26th, 2010 at 4:37pm:
Barnes and Noble $22. :wtf1 :booze |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 27th, 2010 at 4:59pm
Just spent 6 hours on a plane with Keith. 8-)
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ade on Oct 28th, 2010 at 2:51am
for those of us residing in the UK, don't forget to watch BBC-2 at 7pm, tonight (thurs 28th)
"The Culture Show" ...interview with Mr Richards, no less. :willya |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Never Stop Rockin on Oct 28th, 2010 at 5:01am
p.117, extract from Keith's diary, Mon 14th Jan 1963...
"Flamingo club. Surprise!!! Rick and Carlo played. Without a doubt the Rollin' Stones were the most fantastic group operating in the country tonight. Rick and Carlo are 2 of the best... Rick and Carlo! Carlo Little was a butcher, a killing drummer, great energy. And Ricky Fenson on bass, a lovely player. They had bleached their hair for the gig. And who did they really work for? Screaming Lord effing Sutch. From time to time they'd sit in with us - that's when Charlie still wasn't with us, and it's why he decided to join the band. because he heard we had this red-hot rhythm section. Ricky and Carlo, if they went into a solo, they would go into turbo max. The room would take off; they almost blew us off the stage they were so good. The two of them together. When Carlo set into that bass drum, this is what I'm talking about. This was rock and roll! As a kid, to play with these guys, who were only two or three years older than we were, but they had been at it a long time, was something. The first time they took me in there - "OK, it goes like this" - and suddenly had this rhythm section behind me, whoa! That was the first time I got three feet off the ground and into the stratosphere" |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by riffkeither on Oct 28th, 2010 at 6:37am
i got mine ,fantastic !
;D |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Egon on Oct 28th, 2010 at 8:09am
i went on amazon today and looked at the cover...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 28th, 2010 at 3:00pm
Keith's 1-hour interview on 'The Culture Show' just now on BBC was very good. Some footage in it I wasnt familiar with, too.
Concentrated almost exclusively on the period up to the late 60s, but was pretty well done and Keith was on good form. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by MRD8 on Oct 28th, 2010 at 4:01pm http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=328749 Keith Richards A Culture Show Special Broadcast 28th October 2010 1 Hour Artwork included Chapters every 5 minutes P.A.L. Format Lineage Sky DigiBox>Philips DVD Recorder>HD>Dime A BBC interview with Rolling Stone Keith Richards who talks to Andrew Graham Dixon about excess,drugs and rock 'n' roll. Friends and colleagues help to tell the story of the fellows remarkable life. This marks the publication of Keiths autobiography 'Life' focusing on his childhood in Kent,his passion for music,and his band. Video MPEG 2 Video Bitrate 9216 kb/s Audio AC3 256 kbps PAL format 720x576 Picture format 4:3 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by MRD8 on Oct 28th, 2010 at 4:04pm
Do yourselves a favor and get Life on audiobook...it has a preface by Keith himself then the story(clocking in at over twenty hours) is beautifully read by Johnny Depp...just AWESOME!!!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SendIt2Me on Oct 28th, 2010 at 4:31pm MRD8 wrote on Oct 28th, 2010 at 4:04pm:
That is awesome waiting for mine to get here. Can't wait for Keith to tell me bedtime stores :weed :wtf1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 28th, 2010 at 4:42pm MRD8 wrote on Oct 28th, 2010 at 4:04pm:
It includes a PDF with pictures, how good is it MrD? :willya |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 28th, 2010 at 5:01pm
This poor chile is reading the book on Amazon.com (the option "look inside"), all I have read so ar is fucking great and the index at the end looks super too, with a lot of references (i.e. Nicky Hopkins, Jimi Hendrix, etc etc), apparently with a bunch of unseen pictures too, nice acknowledgements!
Buy it voodoo, buy it :willya |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by PartyDoll MEG on Oct 28th, 2010 at 5:18pm MRD8 wrote on Oct 28th, 2010 at 4:04pm:
I don't usually like audiobooks-but I just might have to make an exception for Johnny...... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 28th, 2010 at 6:02pm Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 28th, 2010 at 5:01pm:
Hate to see a poor voodoo chile not getting access to Keith's story...try this (not my link) until your coffers fill up! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Oct 28th, 2010 at 6:53pm Gazza wrote on Oct 27th, 2010 at 7:02am:
Too fvcking funny! Good eye! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Egon on Oct 29th, 2010 at 3:06am Gazza wrote on Oct 28th, 2010 at 3:00pm:
can we watch that online anywhere? edit: seem some people can: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00vll85/The_Culture_Show_Keith_Richards_A_Culture_Show_Special/ not in France though... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 29th, 2010 at 6:43am
Its available as a bit torrent on both dimeadozen and hungercity (the hungercity file is smaller)
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Oct 29th, 2010 at 7:51am Gazza wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 6:43am:
G do you have an easy quick link for how to dowload torrent, I'm a member at hungercity but the files don't work. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 29th, 2010 at 8:00am steel driving hammer wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 7:51am:
the individual torrent sites (including this one) have a FAQ page, but this might be a good overview (I cant access the site from work, but hopefully its ok) http://btfaq.com/ |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by mojoman on Oct 29th, 2010 at 9:41am
i have yet to receive my copy from amazon....................
:Youmakeagrownmancrylikejoey |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Oct 29th, 2010 at 9:56am Gazza wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 8:00am:
I'm surprised Dime would allow this as it should qualify as "officially" released? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 29th, 2010 at 10:45am
it's a TV interview special, mate - not an official release.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by dadrob on Oct 29th, 2010 at 10:51am
I just watched that culture show....pretty damn fun to view.
I am loving the book especially the bits about Stu. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Oct 29th, 2010 at 11:03am Gazza wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 10:45am:
ahh OK I thought it was the whole book!...lol |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 29th, 2010 at 11:15am mojoman wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 9:41am:
Mick has a tiny todger....That's all you really need to know. :boring |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 29th, 2010 at 11:34am
I'm on page 60 and this is a fascinating read. I'm not going to spoil any of it, but he comes across as so human and real.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 29th, 2010 at 1:26pm
I started with the last chapter, pretty disappointing, he mostly skims over events, a few lines on the 2004 writing session at Mick's in France, the only scoop is so far is that Macca visited him in early 2005 and that they started writing a song together
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbling Dijs on Oct 29th, 2010 at 2:50pm
The BBC interview is also available in the newsgroups.
BBC_Keith.jpg (Attachment deleted) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 29th, 2010 at 6:44pm
Tonight in NYC:
Photos: Kevin Mazur/WireImage Keith and the missus look great. Stevie? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Oct 29th, 2010 at 7:05pm
Keith looks pretty good.
I can still see an extended belly in the fifth pic, but it doesn't look as extended as in other pics I've seen over the last year or so. I wonder if he feels like he's tour ready. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Oct 29th, 2010 at 7:31pm gotdablouse wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 1:26pm:
Um, I would imagine that, in any "Life" of Keith Richards, the end is going to be the least interesting. [smiley=huh.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 29th, 2010 at 7:45pm
I see your point, however we've lived through these recent events so it would be interesting to get his take on things and also get a sense of what's in store...the story of the 1975 has been told so many times, including recently by Bill German that while it makes good copy it doesn't seem to me like it was worth spending so much time on it...unless you're trying to ramp up the myth...Keith says he's been forced to play along with.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 29th, 2010 at 8:12pm
Thanks lefty
Some more with thanks to moy, all by Kevin Mazur |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 29th, 2010 at 8:46pm With Paul Holdengraber, Michael Inman and Michael Pietsch of the NYPL |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 29th, 2010 at 8:53pm
Listen the audio book here http://www.audible.com/pd/ref=sr_1_20?asin=B0048G19IE&qid=1288403427&sr=1-20
LOL don't forget to click play :forfucksake |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 29th, 2010 at 8:55pm
LOL BTW in some seconds I have heard a mention a bunch of drugs including MMMN = Mexican Magic Mother Nature
:interestingstuffronnie |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 29th, 2010 at 9:29pm
Check Marlon's take about the book here, posted at our message board in Spanish but posted in English
:forfucksake http://rocksoff.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=10658 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 29th, 2010 at 9:38pm
It may be a small pic from her phone, but a great fan named Boosabops did make it in and was in the front row.
She has yet to report in. I am hoping she is off with Keith, as she ADORES him. I'd be at Bellevue in a comatose state. :o |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Copsnrobbers on Oct 29th, 2010 at 11:52pm
Boosabops posted her review on Shidoobee,
on IORR Schillid posted (youtube) about a minute and a half of the event Swiss got some tweets also posted on Shidoobee & IORR thanks everyone fantastic Mazur photos Left Shoe, thanks for posting too [smiley=2vrolijk_08.gif] the news of Keef/N.Y. is breaking fast. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 30th, 2010 at 1:57am gotdablouse wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 7:45pm:
Bill German wasnt anywhere near the Stones in '75 though, as he was a kid of about 12. Keith, on the other hand.... The book's a great read. I'm having trouble tearing myself away from it to even eat or sleep |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 30th, 2010 at 2:06am
Right, looks like he got a pretty good account from Freddy, but my point was that other than drumming up the "outlaw" image I don't see the point of starting the book with that "incident". The book is an entertaining read obviously, it just doesn't always go very deep. I would have liked to know for instance why he stops after telling us that "You win again" is the only recording that got released from his home studio, what else was finished and not released?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 30th, 2010 at 6:49am
I guess its quite common now for stories - be it in book or cinematic form - to not put everything in strictly chronological or linear fashion.
I think your analysis is spot-on - ie, its probably to give an example of the outlaw image from the outset. It also draws the target audience in from the outset more so than a chapter on his early life in the austerity of post-war suburbia would (although, personally, I found that stuff to be great reading. Even down to the name of his grandfather's dog - 'Mr Thompson Wooft'. LOL) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 30th, 2010 at 7:07am
KEITH'S A REAL LIBRARY CARD
By DAN AQUILANTE Last Updated: 4:43 AM, October 30, 2010 Posted: 12:07 AM, October 30, 2010 - Photo/WireImage Getting satisfaction at the New York Public Library was a whole lot easier last night when legendary rock god Keith Richards dropped into the main branch on Fifth Avenue to talk about his just-released autobiography, “Life.” As if he needed street cred on the literary front, the 66-year-old co-founder of the Rolling Stones in his deep rumble confided to the audience of 500, “I love libraries. They’re places where you want to obey the laws — even the ones about silence.” Then, as if he felt it necessary that he live up to his rebel image, the legendary guitarist added, “I still owe fines on overdue books from 50 years ago.” That’s the way it went at this event, which sold out in a record 43 seconds. Hosted by music commentator Anthony DeCurtis, the evening was presented in a conversational format where Richards joked and didn’t smoke as he recalled his life and times. Slouching in a high-backed bishop’s chair, leather-faced Richards, known for his drinking and drugging over the last 40 years, reminisced with remarkable clarity, although he was evasive when it came to delicate subjects such as Mick Jagger. In his book, Richards is tough on Jagger, saying Mick has a major case of egomaniac. Last night, Richards was kind. “Mick and I shared a burning interest in the blues and we were amazed we found each other,” Keith recalled. “In those early days, we were so idealistic.” When DeCurtis asked the guitarist about his use of drugs, Richards told the crowd “they seep into your life.” A moment later he said, “I need to take a break.” When Richards returned to the stage within two minutes, DeCurtis immediately returned to the subject. Despite his discomfort, Richards, who hasn’t been a junkie for 30 years, said “all my news about drugs is out of date.” There was almost zero acid in anything Richards said. About the Beatles vs. the Stones rivalry, he revealed: “I never felt the competition, I felt camaraderie.” “The Beatles,” he explained, “were primarily a vocal group where either Paul or John took the lead. The Stones were more instrumental and we had one frontman, and he was the best.” Yet while Keith never spoke about wild rumors from the ‘80s, like his heading to Switzerland to get total transfusions from the blood of teenagers or more recently that he snorted the ashes of his cremated father, he did say the one thing that most of the fans in the room wanted to hear. When asked about the possibility of a new Rolling Stones record and supporting tour, Richards was quick to reply, “I’ll do my best to chat the guys into it, I think there’ll be something next year.” - New York Post Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/music/keith_real_library_card_5gw8Z42Wrjdryg4xeQWuaJ#ixzz13qKgOOSh |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Oct 30th, 2010 at 8:05am
Very important words here...
“The Beatles,” he explained, “were primarily a vocal group where either Paul or John took the lead. The Stones were more instrumental and we had one frontman, and he was the best.” |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Oct 30th, 2010 at 8:36am Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 9:29pm:
Is this really Marlon's response? If it is, good on him. You expect that from someone's child. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 30th, 2010 at 9:54am
Great pics from the library. Looks like it was a really cool event.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Oct 30th, 2010 at 10:14am
Keith Richards and the New Librarians...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Jeep on Oct 30th, 2010 at 10:50am |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by mojoman on Oct 30th, 2010 at 10:51am
Keith Richards and the X-Pensive Bibliophile's...................
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 30th, 2010 at 11:12am The Wick wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 8:36am:
I think he sounds like an ungrateful spoiled brat. He hasn't had to work a day in his life thanks to Daddy's millions. I have heard that he is a fiercely private guy and shuns the spotlight. He's very close to his Mother and guards her privacy like a lion. I am sure he would find all of us disgusting freaks. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Oct 30th, 2010 at 12:07pm LadyJane wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 11:12am:
Why a spoiled brat? How many people do you know who would like to read books by their parents talking about having oral sex in the back of a car or hear about him getting up to all kinds of sexual and drug fueled escapades? I know he's grown up with that to a certain extent, but he also has kids and I'm sure he's not enamoured with the idea of his children reading about their grandparents and their sexual practices. As for not working? I really don't know if anyone can seriously make such a claim. You might know more than I do, but honestly, there is really no way to know if he has not worked hard for his life. Why I'm curious to know if it's really him is exactly because he seems so private so I am surprised that he would comment. He may think we are all freaks but I just like that he stuck up for Mick more than his father. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 30th, 2010 at 3:45pm
Some more Kevin Mazur's pix with thanks to moy
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Oct 30th, 2010 at 3:46pm
LOL check this, could be a drug dealer trying to ge paid from some drugs his dad sold to Keith in the 70s
These pix by James Devaney with thanks to moy |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Oct 30th, 2010 at 3:49pm Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 3:46pm:
I'd love to know what this was all about. :perverted |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by mojoman on Oct 30th, 2010 at 4:10pm Edith Grove wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 3:49pm:
prolly one of micks kids............. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Oct 30th, 2010 at 4:25pm
Glad he wasn't hurt.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Oct 30th, 2010 at 4:29pm
Must have been a chilly night in NYC.
His jacket is covering up his exposed boxers ! :forfucksake |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Oct 30th, 2010 at 5:11pm
OCTOBER 30, 2010, 6:00 PM ET
Keith Richards On His Relationship With Mick Jagger By Steven Kurutz Getty In Keith Richards’ new memoir, “Life,” he writes about his long, complicated relationship with Mick Jagger, recalling that during a fractious time in the 1980s, he began to derisively refer to his bandmate as “Brenda.” In the book, Richards characterizes the late-period Jagger as someone who’s egocentric, slavish to new musical trends and suspicious of people’s motivations to the point of being self-isolated. Perhaps Richards realized that if he wants to tour again as the Rolling Stones, it’s not a wise move to insult the singer, because at a talk last night at the New York Public Library the Stones guitarist was noticeably deferential to Mick. Asked about the songwriting process by interviewer Anthony DeCurtis, Richards said that he writes specifically with Jagger in mind. “Midnight Rambler” — ain’t nobody else can sing that, except Mick,” Richards said. At another point, in discussing the primary differences between the Beatles and the Stones, Richards said the Beatles were a vocal group, while the Stones were more of an instrumental band. “We had one frontman, so he better be good, right? He was the best.” Underscoring Richards’ place at the very top of the rock and fame firmament, the audience was filled with celebrities like Jimmy Fallon, Lou Reed and Richard Belzer who came to hear Richards speak about his life and career. Paul Holdengräber, director of Live from the NYPL, extended the invitation for Richards to speak after he read an article earlier this year in which the guitarist talked about the importance of libraries, calling the them the great “equalizer.” Richards ended the evening by offering the crowd the tantalizing news that, regarding a Stones album or tour, ”I do think there will be something next year.” http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010/10/30/keith-richards-on-his-relationship-with-mick-jagger/ |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Oct 30th, 2010 at 5:49pm
My bad Gazza :aimama
I love when they play the blues you know. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 30th, 2010 at 5:50pm
For those of you with facebook access, some nice photos here from a 'Keith Richards Visits NYPL' page :
http://www.facebook.com/#!/album.php?aid=259588&id=21557622350 Pretty sure thats Debi (Boosabops) in the first pic. Apparently, Shelly Lazar snagged about 75 of the tickets. Sounds like another event which the regular fans did very well to get anywhere near. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 30th, 2010 at 5:56pm steel driving hammer wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 5:49pm:
never post on an empty head, Steelie! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 30th, 2010 at 7:42pm Keith Richards Opens Up in Wide-Ranging Conversation The Rolling Stones guitarist discusses his post-war childhood, parenthood, thoughts on Mick Jagger and more at public library event By Patrick Doyle Oct 30, 2010 Jori Klein/NYPL Keith Richards, who has an extensive library in his Connecticut home, once said, “Growing up, there are two institutional places that affect you most powerfully: the church, which belongs to God, and the public library, which belongs to you.” Paul Holdengraber, the director of programs at the New York Public Library, read the quote aloud to an audience of 600 Friday night as he introduced Richards, who came to the Stephen A. Schwarzman building for “Live from the NYPL,” a conversation keyed to Life, the guitarist’s new memoir. Rolling Stone contributing editor Anthony Decurtis led the conversation. It was a rare opportunity to hear Richards talk at length, with topics ranging from his post-war childhood in England (“We didn’t know there was anything else out there”), his respect for Mick Jagger (“No one can sing ‘Midnight Rambler’ but him”) and parenthood (“Suddenly there’s a little creature who depends on you — that a sense of responsibility comes into play”). Even though Richards declined to even have a guitar placed onstage, the buzz leading up to the show practically rivaled a Stones gig. It sold out in 42 seconds. There was a film crew in attendance, along with the familiar faces in the Stones world; their security detail, promoter Michael Cohl and plenty of famous fans like Lou Reed and Steve Van Zandt. Richards took the stage at 7:30 p.m. wearing a tan fedora, black leather jacket, and orange suede boots. He grinned at the roaring crowd as he sat down. “The Dartford Public Library was nothing like this,” he laughed. The guitarist began with his childhood in England. “There was rubble everywhere,” he said. “If there was a building left, fantastic.” He spent most free time reading in the library (which “gave you a sense that there was something out there”) and, eventually, listening to American music — his parent’s jazz (Sarah Vaughn and Ella Fitzgerald) and early sounds of rock and roll. “You should realize that the rest of the world has been fascinated by American music,” he said, turning his head to the audience. “That cross-saturation of ideas only possible from different cultures. You didn’t have it in Europe. We had the polka,” he laughed. “I can’t say it strongly enough. Hell, even Nazis loved the jazz bands.” He discussed the well-known tale of meeting Mick Jagger on a train, saying, “I asked him where did you get those records?’ ‘Chicago.’ It started from there. I just wanted to steal his records.” Richards and Jagger were soon studying the blues with their new bandmates, Charlie Watts, Bill Wyman and Brian Jones. “We were amazed we had found each other and that we could sit around and listen to these guys — Jimmy Reed, Elmore James — and think, ‘Oh, it’s not so much the musicality of it. It’s to unveil ideas and especially unveil feeling.” Richards said he wasn’t only captivated by blues music, but also the kind nature of its heroes once he met them, especially Bo Diddley. “They were gentlemen. These guys were very tough guys — but they would explain themselves to you.” Another concern drove the Stones. “[Teenagers] are not gonna hear the real guys,” Richards explained, laughing. “So [we figured] let’s do the second best — sort of as an evangelical philosophy. Why white English guys had to teach Americans about the blues, somehow I still haven’t figured that out.” Richards said he never considered the Beatles rivals. “They were primarily a vocal group. It didn’t really matter whether Paul or John or George was singing the lead. That was interchangeable. In the Stones we had one frontman — and we had the best.” He did mention Bob Dylan as an influence. “He put a new slant on how you could write a song. Do they need to be three minutes long or do you need a little longer? Take it.” Richards became quiet as the conversation turned to his experiences with drugs. He started to explain that he took them to keep up with the Stones’ demanding schedule, but then stopped and said, “I’ll tell you what ladies and gentleman, I’m gonna take a break.” He stood up, walked offstage, and returned about a minute later. “That’s better,” he said. (“ Keith's bathroom break certainly surprised me,” Decurtis told Rolling Stone afterward. “If a band takes an extra minute between songs you'd think he's changing. He could be doing whatever he likes. With the rhythm of something like this, it was a little confusing.”) Richards continued by saying he wouldn’t recommend drugs to anybody. He has been clean for thirty years, citing parenthood as his motivation for quitting the hard stuff. His reputation as zonked-out has “been following me like a ball and chain for 30 years,” he said somberly, adding he doesn't even consider himself an authority on drugs anymore. “All my news is out of date.” When Decurtis asked Richards to list three pivotal life moments, Richards replied: “The first time we got in a recording studio and they paid us. The second was playing at the New York Academy of Music — to get on an American stage for the first time that was a real high point of the band. The third? Well, I ain’t been there yet. ” Decurtis asked whether Richards still defines himself primarily as a Stone. “I suppose,” he said. “After all these years, it’d be very difficult for me to separate myself from the Stones in any coherent form … Ask Count Basie what it’s like to keep vital things going after all these years and to still get off on it. Ray Charles, too. These cats could still unify though all those years. And there’s something to it you never want to let go.” James Fox, who co-wrote Life with Richards, told Rolling Stone he was “astonished” after watching the conversation from the audience. “His humility to the people who taught him the music and he revered is something that plays through the whole story,” Fox offered. “I’ve always thought his sense of awe is one of the most interesting things about him. That side of him never altered and kept his feet on the ground. That’s what came across tonight.” Before arriving onstage, Richards spent twenty minutes in the library’s Special Collections room, where the staff had organized several rare items, including a letter from Elizabeth I, an early Shakespeare folio and an early version of the Declaration of Independence. (See photos here.) The last item was covered by a sheet of paper with a note that said, “We’re so proud to have this.” Richards “lifted the sheet of paper,” Decurtis recalled, “And it was Keith’s book. He was just laughing so hard. Keith is very proud to have his book in this library. He’s somebody who takes the literary life pretty seriously.” Rolling Stone |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 30th, 2010 at 8:23pm Gazza wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 5:50pm:
Yep that's Debi! Front row at the Library. Front row at the Beacon with a scene in Shine a Light of Keith handing her a pic. So happy for her. She's one of us!!! 8-) 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 30th, 2010 at 8:52pm Edith Grove wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 3:49pm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkeAzqhlkNk |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 30th, 2010 at 8:59pm Gazza wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 5:50pm:
Exactly,it's not even a concert and fans are getting fucked. I would love to have one of these syncophant so called journalists ask Keith about the Stones business practices. Charging obscene prices for tickets. Having a web site that does nothing but fleece fans. Running the band as a corporation rather than a band. Passing the blame onto to Jagger and Cohl while he sits back and counts his money. Somebody wake me up when somebody does something besides kiss his ass. :willya |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Oct 30th, 2010 at 9:36pm A bunch of disgusting freaks? Certainly not me....as you can plainly see. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 30th, 2010 at 9:47pm
Who is Shelly Lazar? The name rings a familiar bell.
I'll glad I got my refund from the library. This event seemed like a scam. I went to see the Black Crowes instead. They played Just Wanna See His Face and OWNED it. Three hours of music. No talking. No nonsense. Les Pauls and Fenders. Drums. Vocals. Rock and roll. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 30th, 2010 at 10:12pm Shelley Lazar is "The Ticket Queen", and a longtime industry heavyweight. Her company, SLO Limited, provides VIP fan packages for major touring acts and events. She's also a well known philanthropist. You may have seen her name here in relation to the annual MS Walk. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 30th, 2010 at 10:14pm Ginda wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 9:36pm:
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 30th, 2010 at 10:18pm
Bottom line..it looks like it was a GREAT event.
Keith looks better than he has in years, imho. Gold rings on Keith. Gold rings on ALL of US. LJ. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 31st, 2010 at 6:20pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 10:12pm:
Just to clarify, I was merely saying she got a lot of tickets. She's always struck me as a very nice lady. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Oct 31st, 2010 at 6:22pm Jeep wrote on Oct 30th, 2010 at 10:50am: LOL. Genius. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 31st, 2010 at 6:37pm Gazza wrote on Oct 31st, 2010 at 6:20pm:
No worries. My post was a reply to Steel Wheels' "who is" question. I share your opinion of Ms. Lazar. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Oct 31st, 2010 at 6:53pm Gazza wrote on Oct 31st, 2010 at 6:22pm:
Indeed, almost looks legit! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Nov 2nd, 2010 at 10:41am
Gotdablouse, I owe you an apology. I got "Life" and, almost unconsciously, flipped toward the end! I figured, I've heard everything else; I want what's new -- now! I think I found it a little more revealing than you did, though. And it got me questioning some of the harsh things I've said about Keith over the last few years. When I read of tracks cut in the "L," plus Ronnie's statement recently that they worked on some of Keith's unused BB tracks -- maybe Keith hasn't been so unproductive after all. Certainly this book is evidence of considerable effort, of a different kind than we're accustomed from Keith.
I start to piece things together: a brilliant Hank Williams cover in "You Win Again." Working with Norah Jones and Willie Nelson. Covering Hoagy Carmichael with the Stones. Composing with Blondie and Bernard, yielding vocally and harmonically complex tunes like "Stop" and "Thief" ... More Wingless Angels. ... Is it possible, as Keith hints at in the book several times, that he's just not all that interesting in writing "Stonesy" rock-and-roll songs anymore? Could there be a trove of unreleased "You Win Again," "This Place Is Empty"-type fragments in the Keith vault? And who knows what else? Will we ever hear them? It's the kind of things critics would drool over, as opposed to the "cock, tits, and booty" fare that Mick is still keen on serving up. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Nov 2nd, 2010 at 3:23pm
Hehe and apology accepted ;-)
Yes I've been thinking about that too, the book has its merits even though it doesn't always dig as deep as it could and Keith is just happy to dispense his wisdom page after page all around the "I don't live life by the rules" moto...but as someone pointed out he's happy to let Mick and Cohl take the crap and count his money. About the "L Studio", I think Gazza posted recently that Patti had said that it wasn't even there anymore ? I think that if he'd had enough finished tracks he would have put it out, certainly if someone had vetoed him he would have complained about it in his book...or maybe not! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Nov 2nd, 2010 at 3:56pm
Yes, the "L" was dismantled due to Patti's cancer -- as valid a reason to shut down a home studio as there's ever been!
As for the BB sessions, it's not obvious to me that Keith's stuff was vetoed. It's possible it just never got properly teed up. The way Keith likes to work in the studio, as people like Wachtel attest in the book, is to improv for hours until something "sticks." Mick the money-machine marionette very explicitly ruled out that kind of process for BB -- "no f*cking about," no endless 12-bar jams, etc. Maybe the album was so extraordinarily Mick-heavy is not because Keith is creatively dried up -- as I suspected, and mourned -- but that he just collided headlong into the Cohl/Jagger timeline barrier. I think I speculated along these lines at the time, but the book seems to confirm it further... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Nov 2nd, 2010 at 4:42pm
Are you being ironic about his home studio being closed down? Not sure how it helped Patti that Keith could no longer record music easily?
You'd think Keith would have had stuff fleshed out after 10 years mucking around in his studio, but what I meant is that nothing was preventing him from releasing a solo album if he'd finished an album worth of "You win again" style songs, as a side note I heard it at Chipotle the other day and my wife coulnd't believe it was Keith singing, great version! The bigger problem I have with Keith's book is that there is no one to look at the other side of the coin, something Peter Ames Carlin does admirably on his Macca book I'm just finishing. There are some interesting moments when Keith writes something and then there is a quote "I'd better let xyz give his thoughts..." and it's very different! Notably on his meeting with Patti! What else is he not remembering properly?! For instance it would be interesting to know why Mick apparently kept saying "Oh Keith just shup up" during their meetings in the nineties, Mick is not an idiot and he's English, so there must have been good reasons for him to say that, Keith is trying to suggest it was completely arbitrary and that Mick has a siege mentality, etc...I suspect Keith was being completely aloof in these meetings as he was during that European tele-press conference where he was completely out of it and Mick was trying to distract attention away from him! Good point for Keith, he sets the record straight on Anita not being raped when she was jailed in Kingston in 1973 and Keith subsequently giving money to Sanchez to have the guy who let that happen killed...you have to wonder why Spanish Tony made up that story though, Keith suggests it was at the instigation of his ghost writer... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Nov 2nd, 2010 at 5:41pm
I'm pretty sure Patti said in the Vogue interview that she preferred that the "L" shut down while she recovered. ...
As for Keith opting to sit on unreleased material rather than release it on his own shingle -- who's to say for sure? We do know he has criticized Mick, severely at times, for not keeping a low enough profile during the Stones' off years. Maybe he feels, at this point, it's the Stones or nothing. A pity, if so. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Soldatti on Nov 2nd, 2010 at 9:21pm
Life debuts at #3 in UK with 28,213 copies sold:
Keef, Katie Price, Chris Evans and the Meerkat hit top 50 02.11.10 | Philip Stone Four celebrity memoirs début in the Official UK Top 50 this week, bringing the total number of celeb-mems in the chart to 12. This is a significant improvement on the same week last year when just three made the Official UK Top 50. Three of the débuting four take positions in the top 10, led by Rolling Stones legend Keith Richards' Life (Weidenfeld), which sold 28,213 copies in its opening week in bookshops. It takes third position in the Official UK Top 50, behind the latest edition of Guinness World Records (in second) and Jamie Oliver's Jamie's 30-minute Meals (Michael Joseph) which sold a phenomenal 78,606 copies at UK booksellers last week—the strongest ever October weekly sale since records began. Katie Price's fourth memoir in just over six years, You Only Live Once (Century) sold 17,752 copies in its opening week in shops, and takes seventh position overall, while TV star Aleksandr Orlov's A Simples Life (Ebury) débuts in ninth place. Chris Evans' tales of his wilderness years, Memoirs of a Fruitcake (HarperCollins), is the fourth celebrity entry into the top 50, selling 10,671 copies last week. It takes 24th place. Kate Mosse's The Winter Ghosts (Orion), the fifth most popular purchase at UK bookshops last week, débuts in pole position in this week's mass-market fiction chart thanks to a Waterstone's "link-save"-boosted 20,743 sale, while new books by three of the biggest names in fiction join the Original Fiction Top 20. John Grisham's The Confession (Century) and Patricia Cornwell's Port Mortuary (Little, Brown) take second and third place respectively, while Danielle Steel's Legacy (Bantam Press) charts in eighth. Also new into the Original Fiction list is comedienne Dawn French's first novel, A Tiny Bit Marvellous (Michael Joseph), which sold 4,182 copies in its first week in shops. This week's Top 20 Paperback Non-fiction chart welcomes two new entries—feline books from the en-vogue pet memoir genre. Helen Brown's Cleo (Hodder) charts in 11th place, while Denis O'Connor's Paw Tracks at Owl Cottage (Constable), the follow-up to the surprise, tear-inducing 2009 hit Paw Tracks in the Moonlight, sneaks in at number 19. Meanwhile, in children's, annuals are slowly climbing the charts ahead of Christmas. The Beano remains the bestseller, with Peppa Pig and Doctor Who close behind in sales terms. In total, £35.9m was spent at UK booksellers last week, up 4.5% week-on-week but down 0.4% on the same week last year when Guinness World Records topped the chart for the first time in 2009. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 1:32pm Waterstone's London, 11/03: Getty Images |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 1:51pm
Our boy's looking good 8-)
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 2:18pm
Great pictures, thanks left shoe shuffle, I was uploading the pix you sent me from yesterday when I saw this one and at the sime time I received a bunch of pix from moy
Here's one Who's there? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 3:19pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 3:20pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 3:34pm
With those green shoes is Keith looking to play a villain in a new batman re-make?....wtf???
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 3:39pm Egon wrote on Oct 29th, 2010 at 3:06am:
For those that live outside the UK i have uploaded the show here http://www.megaupload.com/?d=U119D9D0 The first five minutes is missing (i forgot to set the recorder) but it was only about his childhood. Single file download, 269 mb use VLC media player to watch. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 3:48pm
Wait a minute....the England book event was a true signing? He put pen to book for the fans?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 3:52pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 3:34pm:
I dont think he has taken them off since he aquired them. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Tumbling Dijs on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 4:03pm
Great Pictures, thanks! He really looks good without the eyeliner!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by lavendar on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 4:47pm
Such a Distinguished lookin Gent.
and a Very Handsome photo. :forfucksake |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 5:00pm Tumbling Dijs wrote on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 4:03pm:
I agree - Keith looks much better sans eyeliner. A nice change. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 6:01pm Nice little interview with Sky News. "You embark yourself on this career and then you've got to be ready to rock and roll. And rolling is the most important..." |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Paranoid Android on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 9:14pm
Anybody get the JOHNNY DEPP audio version?
How is it? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 11:17pm paul wrote on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 3:39pm:
Thanks a LOT HTM! You rock |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Nov 4th, 2010 at 3:04am Paranoid Android wrote on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 9:14pm:
I've pre-ordered it and still waiting, but there's a very sweet sample featuring both Keith and Johnny at amazon.co.uk: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1409124746/ref=oss_product Can't wait 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Nov 4th, 2010 at 7:03am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/news/20101104_keith.shtml
Another BBC interview. Keith says the Stones will tour again next year, well sort of,maybe. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 4th, 2010 at 10:18am "Everybody's ready to go out there again. Who said it should stop, and who said when?" 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 4th, 2010 at 10:18am Keef: 'Mick and I are still close' Thu Nov 4 2010 ITN Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards insists he and frontman Mick Jagger are still the best of friends. Richards reveals all about the pair's rocky relationship in his new autobiography Life. Launching the book in Central London, the legendary rocker said he had given the singer a preview copy and there was no rift between the two over occasionally scathing remarks that appear in the pages. He said: "Mick and I are like that, you know. And we've said far worse about each other. I really cleaned it up. "Guys don't work together for 50 years almost without having the odd contre-temps." Watch the interview @ ITN |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by PartyDoll MEG on Nov 4th, 2010 at 1:54pm Paranoid Android wrote on Nov 3rd, 2010 at 9:14pm:
I don't do audiobooks.. I like the written word better..but I am listening to Johnny right now....It is great when Johnny quotes Keith or anyone else.... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 4th, 2010 at 2:29pm Stray Cat Blues By LIZ PHAIR Published: November 4, 2010 This review will appear in the Nov. 14 Book Review. Illustration by Yuko Shimizu He’s been a global avatar of wish fulfillment for over four decades and managed to eke more waking hours out of a 24-hour day than perhaps any other creature alive (thanks, Merck cocaine and amphetamines!). As Keith puts it: “For many years I slept, on average, twice a week. This means that I have been conscious for at least three lifetimes.” You better believe it. This cat put the joie in joie de vivre. As the legendary guitarist for the Rolling Stones, Keith Richards has done more, been more and seen more than you or I will ever dream of, and reading his autobiography, “Life,” should awaken (if you have a pulse and an I.Q. north of 100) a little bit of the rock star in you. “If you want to get to the top, you’ve got to start at the bottom,” he says, “same with anything.” Born in 1943 to parents who met as factory workers, Keith was raised in Dartford, an industrial suburb of London. Through the marshes behind the many “lunatic asylums” that seemed to populate Dartford in disproportionate numbers, Keith learned what it felt like to be helpless and afraid, serving as a daily punching bag for bullies on his way home from school. By the time he fought back and won, he’d discovered a fury in himself for which he would later become infamous. The plight of the underdog was his passionate crusade, and anyone or anything that represented injustice in his eyes was fair game. Kate Moss recounts a hilarious anecdote from 1998 in which Keith, sidestepping the festivities of his daughter Angela’s wedding at his manor house, Redlands, finds he’s short some spring onions he laid on a chopping block while fixing himself a light nosh of bangers and mash. When the thieving guest totters into the kitchen with the greens playfully tucked behind his ears, Keith grabs two sabers from the mantelpiece and goes chasing after the poor guy in a homicidal rage. I won’t even touch on the incident involving shepherd’s pie. Music is at the core of “Life,” as it is at the core of Keith. His grandfather Gus, patriarch of the bohemian family on his mother’s side, played a pivotal role in developing Keith’s love and respect for music. They took long walks together, sometimes all day, talking about the world and stopping at various establishments where Gus, ushered into a back room by his hosts, would leave the young Keith outside, with time to ponder his grandfather’s mischievous and gamboling private life. Gus had been a sax player in a dance band in the ’30s and knew just how to get a young boy interested in a musical instrument. “I’ll never forget the guitar on top of his upright piano every time I’d go and visit, starting maybe from the age of 5,” Keith says. “I thought it was always there. And I just kept looking at it, and he didn’t say anything, and a few years later I was still looking at it. ‘Hey, when you get tall enough, you can have a go at it,’ he said. I didn’t find out until after he was dead that he only brought that out and put it up there when he knew I was coming to visit.” Keith’s first guitar, bought when he was 15, became so much a part of him he was rarely without it, sleeping with his arm draped across its body like a girlfriend: his primary relationship. Keith’s values were set early and have remained consistent to a remarkable degree. Disloyalty is about as low as you can go in his book, one step lower, even, than screwing up the music. Women? Take ’em. Vices? First round’s on me! But never, ever, EVER cross a mate. It’s an idea born of his Boy Scout days as head of the Beaver Patrol. He found he had a knack for marshaling troops, leading by example and rarely pulling rank. (For parents keen on enrolling their children in wholesome activities to secure a respectable future and avoid exactly what became of Keith Richards, keep in mind: he was a choirboy, too.) It’s only after Keith’s been kicked out of technical school that he hits his stride as a musician, obsessively studying Chess Records artists of the ’50s like Chuck Berry, Bo Diddley, Willie Dixon, Muddy Waters and John Lee Hooker. His old school pal Mick Jagger shares his passion for Delta blues, and soon they form a band whose nascent lineup will become the Rolling Stones. Musically, these are the formative years. Keith learns to play against the silence, to make what isn’t there as audible as what is, standing on the shoulders of the American blues greats. He marvels: “It wasn’t loud, necessarily, it just came from way down deep. The whole body was involved; they weren’t just singing from the heart, they were singing from the guts.” He describes his style: “I find myself trying to play horn lines all the time on the guitar. . . . If it’s an A chord, a hint of D. Or if it’s a song with a different feeling . . . a hint of G should come in somewhere, which makes a seventh, which then can lead you on. Readers who wish to can skip Keef’s Guitar Workshop, but I’m passing on the simple secrets anyway, which led to the open chord riffs of later years — the ‘Jack Flash’ and ‘Gimme Shelter’ ones.” Believe me, you won’t want to miss a thing. The most impressive part of “Life” is the wealth of knowledge Keith shares, whether he’s telling you how to layer an acoustic guitar until it sounds electric, as he did on the classic Stones track “Street Fighting Man,” or how to win a knife fight. He delivers recipe after recipe for everything rock ’n’ roll, and let me say it’s quite an education. In 1964, the year of the British Invasion, when both the Stones and the Beatles broke big in America, Keith and the band had been touring for a while in Britain, sharing the stage with colorful characters like Little Richard and the Ronettes, whose lead singer, Ronnie Bennett (later Ronnie Spector), was one of Keith’s early romances. The Stones cut their teeth on the road, starting in 1963: “Between then and 1966 — for three years — we played virtually every night, or every day, sometimes two gigs a day. We played well over a thousand gigs, almost back to back, with barely a break and perhaps 10 days off in that whole period.” It was a lifestyle that would lead Keith toward drugs as a way to cope with its extremity. Nineteen sixty-four was also a year of great cultural shifts: the burgeoning youth culture, the civil rights movement and the early antiwar protests all intersected in the irreverent personas of the Rolling Stones. They were white, but sounded black. They played American music, but came from England. They dressed like women and didn’t cut their hair, yet everyone’s wife, girlfriend or daughter went mad for their raw sexuality. Worst of all, they remained resolutely lax about the strictures of the law. As Bobby Keys, Keith’s best friend and the sax player on some Stones records, tells it, “The American music scene, the whole set of teenage idols and clean-cut boys from next door and nice little songs, all that went right out the . . . window when these guys showed up!” One theme in the book that really stuns is the extent to which Keith Richards has been pursued by the police on nearly every continent for the duration of his career. They’re pulling over buses, battering down doors and hanging out of trees trying to get a charge that will stick to music’s most notorious and, thus far, ne’er-long-incarcerated bad boy. The archetype of the rock ’n’ roll antihero is, by now, a familiar image. What is shocking to remember is that Keith himself invented it. It’s obvious he just doesn’t give a damn about the rules the rest of us live by. The book opens with a Keystone Kops-worthy caper in which Keith, his bandmate Ronnie Wood and a friend are busted in Arkansas while on tour in 1975, all three of them flinging drugs off their persons like spigots in the Trevi Fountain, attempting to rid themselves of illegal substances before they are searched. Neither the hunters nor their prey play their parts well in this farce. Keith and his companions are too stoned to dodge the incoming, and the authorities too compromised by the heady publicity of it all to get the job done. It’s a dilemma that proves to be an enduring asset for the Stones: “The choice always was a tricky one for the authorities who arrested us. Do you want to lock them up, or have your photograph taken with them and give them a motorcade to see them on their way?” As their popularity grows, so does their stardust. “Suddenly we were being courted by half the aristocracy, the younger scions, the heirs to some ancient pile, the Ormsby-Gores, the Tennants, the whole lot. I’ve never known if they were slumming or we were snobbing.” It’s a blue-collar fairy tale, but distance between Mick and Keith begins to steadily expand — so much so, Keith confesses, that “I haven’t gone to his dressing room in, I don’t think, 20 years.” The Glimmer Twins, once so close Keith claims they had “identical taste in music,” now get caught up in the drug-fueled circus that defines middle-period Rolling Stones, the late ’60s and early ’70s. These are the golden years, the years of “Sticky Fingers” and “Beggars Banquet,” when excess converges with success in such a way as to make it all seem causal. But a certain guest at the party makes quite an impression and stubbornly refuses to leave: heroin. Keith’s drug habit progresses, but he moves into one of the most prolific writing periods of his career. He and Mick compose most of the songs for “Beggars Banquet,” “Let It Bleed,” “Sticky Fingers” and “Exile on Main Street” while Keith is under the influence. Pulled by the poppy and pushed by cocaine, Keith acquires a taste for working unholy hours in the studio that damn near kill his colleagues. He goes round the clock and considers it mutiny if anyone toiling with him leaves the deck. “I realized, I’m running on fuel and everybody else isn’t. They’re trying to keep up with me and I’m just burning. I can keep going because I’m on pure cocaine . . . I’m running on high octane, and if I feel I’m pushing it a little bit, need to relax it, have a little bump of smack.” He’s trying to impress upon his readers not the foolishness of this diet but rather the impossibility of its being replicated, since drugs of this caliber are no longer available, and few have the discipline to stick to the recommended doses. No wonder Johnny Depp modeled his “Pirates of the Caribbean” character, Capt. Jack Sparrow, on this rakish and tippling taskmaster. Around this time, Keith hooks up with the Rolling Stones’ answer to Yoko Ono: Anita Pallenberg. She and Keith fall for each other hard while she’s still the girlfriend of his bandmate Brian Jones. Keith takes pains to describe what an ass Brian was at the time, falling prey to the vanity of fame, as a way to excuse himself. And indeed, Keith levies the same complaint against Mick Jagger, offering a diagnosis of L.V.S., or “lead vocalist syndrome.” In regard to their differing approaches to the pressures of stardom, he says: “Mick chose flattery, which is very like junk — a departure from reality. I chose junk.” Mick and Anita end up having an affair while thrown together on the set of the film “Performance,” and Keith makes sure to give as good as he got, sleeping with Marianne Faithfull, Mick’s main squeeze at the time, behind his back. “While you’re missing it, I’m kissing it,” Keith says with boyish glee, adding: “It probably put a bigger gap between me and Mick than anything else, but mainly on Mick’s part, not mine. And probably forever.” If Keith weren’t such a brilliant character, the reader might weary of his hypocrisy. But the truth is, he’s hilarious. I got tired of jotting “hahahaha” and “LOL” in the margins. James Fox, Keith’s co-author, deserves a lot of credit for editing, organizing and elegantly stepping out of the way of Keith’s remembrances. Reading “Life” is like getting to corner Keith Richards in a room and ask him everything you ever wanted to know about the Rolling Stones, and have him be completely honest with you. Here’s how he describes recording: “Well, I’ve got to tame this beast one way or another. But how to tame it? Gently, or give it a beating? . . . I’ll take you twice the speed I wrote you! You have this sort of relationship with the songs. . . . You ain’t finished till you’re finished, O.K.? . . . No, you weren’t supposed to go there. Or sometimes you’re apologizing: I’m sorry about that. No, that was certainly not the way to go. Ah, they’re funny things. They’re babies.” Keith and Anita have three children together, but their 2-month-old son, Tara, dies while Keith is away working. The pain will stay with him forever. At the time, Marlon, his elder son, is on the road for a spell with his dad, providing a light at the end of the tunnel for Keith, who deals with these tough emotions in the midst of a bacchanalia on overdrive. According to Marlon, there was never anything that crazy on tour. This is where the two photo sections really tell the story: a beautiful shot of Keith, wind in his hair, turning his back on the crowd, barely conscious, and another of Keith rolling off the jetway into his private limo, Jack Daniel’s in hand, with all the self-assurance of the heir apparent, flanked by a beefy, uncomprehending, and likely disapproving, fleet of drivers. “We had become a pirate nation,” he says about the 1972 American tour, “moving on a huge scale under our own flag, with lawyers, clowns, attendants.” Money is the dark matter of the Rolling Stones’ universe, warping and shifting things from the background. In the lean years, Keith would double-string his guitar so the strings would last longer. Later, as the money came in fast and thick, more serious consequences followed mistakes they made, like blindly signing a contract drawn up by their manager Allen Klein that caused them to lose millions. Klein, Keith says, “ended up owning the copyright and the master tapes of all our work — anything written or recorded in the time of our contract with Decca. . . . He got the publishing of years of our songs and we got a cut of the royalties.” There was more trouble as they tried to climb out of the financial hole Klein had dug for them in England: “We were in the ludicrous situation where Klein would be lending us money that we could never afford to repay because he hadn’t paid the tax and anyway we’d spent the money. The tax rate in the early ’70s on the highest earners was 83 percent, and that went up to 98 percent for investments and so-called unearned income. So that’s the same as being told to leave the country.” Heading for Villa Nellcôte in France, the Stones record perhaps their most critically acclaimed album, “Exile on Main Street.” One glorious image from this period is of Keith driving his speedboat, Mandrax, across the crystal blue waters of the Mediterranean, out for a morning cruise with his mates: “We would record from late in the afternoon until 5 or 6 in the morning, and suddenly the dawn comes up and I’ve got this boat. Go down the steps through the cave to the dockside; let’s take Mandrax to Italy for breakfast. . . . No passport, right past Monte Carlo as the sun’s coming up with music ringing in our ears.” The Stones record “Goats Head Soup” in Jamaica, and after the session’s over, Keith and family decide to stay on. He immerses himself in Rasta culture, fascinated by reggae music and its defiant political tradition. “They’re not going to work for Babylon; they’re not going to work for the government. For them that was being taken into slavery.” He finds renewed inspiration in the hybrid musical form and takes pride in being accepted. Though it’s his capacity to tolerate marijuana in large doses that initially endears him to the Rastafarians, it’s easy to see how Keith’s core values harmonize with this way of life. He may be famous, but first and foremost, he’s a musician. Notable names tramp through Keith’s remarkably preserved memory by the dozens, almost too ubiquitous to lend an impact. John Lennon makes a cameo, hunched over a toilet after having tried to keep up with Keith. When Bob Marley is described as a Johnny-come-lately, you know you’re dealing with the crème de la crème. There are poignant moments, too, tossed out with no more windup than the chuck of one’s car keys to a valet, like this insightful gem about Ronnie Wood: “Ronnie is the most malleable character I’ve ever met and a real chameleon. He doesn’t really know who he is. It’s not insincere. He’s just looking for a home. He has a sort of desperation for brotherly love. He needs to belong. He needs a band.” Keith and Anita’s relationship runs aground, and he falls in love with the sunny Patti Hansen, finally an influence of stability and relative restraint in his life. They have two daughters, Alexandra and Theodora, and Keith begins to clear his head of drugs and take stock of his career. Frankly, he has the time. “Brenda,” as he calls Mick, has gone off to do a solo project with which Keith takes great umbrage, believing it an unparalleled betrayal of their principles and the pact they made when they formed the Rolling Stones. “Mick had become uncertain, had started second-guessing his own talent. . . . He forgot his natural rhythm. I know he disagrees with me. What somebody else was doing was far more interesting to him than what he was doing. He even began to act as if he wanted to be someone else.” Keith’s response is to dive headlong into a project of his own, sinking deeper roots as a rhythm and blues guitar player in the X-Pensive Winos. He loves putting together a dream team of guys he’s always wanted to work with, and takes to the stage as if it were a fresh pursuit. But neither Mick nor Keith can escape the fact that they are better together than alone. People feel a certain way about the music that first made them feel a certain way about themselves. In the end, Mick and Keef are like an old married couple, trading sharp jabs but devoted. After Keith falls out of a tree in 2006 and incurs a life-threatening hematoma, he receives get-well wishes from world dignitaries, Tony Blair included: “Dear Keith, you’ve always been one of my heroes.” Keith does a double take: “England’s in the hands of somebody who I’m a hero of?” For the original antiestablishment bad boy, it’s hard to believe how far he’s come: “The streets named for us only a few years after we were being shoved up against the wall.” “I’m not here just to make records and money,” he says. “I’m here to say something and to touch other people, sometimes in a cry of desperation: ‘Do you know this feeling?’ ” The irony is, his feeling of fighting the world is exactly what the world loves so much about Keith: he did it his way. The New York Times Nice review from Ms. Phair, and very cool illustration by Yuko Shimizu. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Nov 5th, 2010 at 9:23am
A friend told me there's a audio version of Keith's Life book on BT Junkie for downloading narrated by Johnny Depp, looked into this & came up with.
http://www.daemonsbooks.com/2010/10/28/johnny-depp-narrates-audiobook-version-of-keith-richards-life/ http://www.openculture.com/2010/11/johnny_depp_narrates_new_keith_richards_autobiography.html |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by moy on Nov 5th, 2010 at 9:56am
This is by journalist Bill Wyman not our Bill
Please Allow Me To Correct a Few Things Mick Jagger responds to Keith Richards about his new autobiography. By Bill Wyman Posted Friday, Nov. 5, 2010, at 7:15 AM ET http://www.slate.com/id/2273611/ Editor's note: On a recent morning, the journalist Bill Wyman received a UPS package containing a typed manuscript. On reading it, he saw that it seemed to be the thoughts, at some length, of singer Mick Jagger on the recently published autobiography of his longtime songwriting partner in the Rolling Stones, Keith Richards. A handwritten note on an old piece of Munro Sounds stationery read: "Bill: For the vault. M." From this, Wyman surmised that the package was intended for Jagger and Richards' former bandmate, the bassist Bill Wyman, who has assiduously overseen the band's archives over the past five decades and with whom Wyman the journalist coincidentally shares the same name. Wyman the journalist, a longtime rock critic, was once threatened with a cease-and-desist letter from Wyman the bassist's Park Avenue attorneys and felt no compunction about perusing the contents of the package. The manuscript he received is reprinted below. I am, I see here, marginally endowed, if I read Keith's sniggering aright. I do not sing well, either. I am not polite to employees; indeed, I have even been known to say, "Oh, shut up, Keith," in band meetings. I do not appreciate the authenticity of the music or the importance of what we do. I want to "lord it over" the band, like James Brown. I am "insufferable." I slept with Anita. Most of that is in just the first quarter of this overlong book, but a tattoo of my failings sounds all through it and culminates in almost 20 full pages of rambling invective near the end. I don't mind this, really, for reasons I hope are understandable and will get into later. This is all from a guy pushing 70 for whom gays are still "poofters" and women "bitches." I think so many things about Keith. We were close, the two of us, for many years. We had known each other in grade school, if you can believe it, in the same undistinguished eastern suburb. Then we bumped into each other in a train station at 18 or so and started talking about the blues. We were different; I'd already been on TV with my father, who was a fairly notable expert on physical education at the time. Keith was … rougher, let's say. For the next nearly 10 years, we were rarely apart. Even after we were famous, we lived at each others' flats or houses. We were still very young, and, like puppies, we'd cluster together. We were barely a band before our lives changed, but I think still of the time we spent, squalidly, before we were a group, in a very cold and small flat, more filthy than you can imagine. Our flatmate Jimmy Phelge was a veritable comic virtuoso with a pair of soiled underwear. Certainly we—I—wanted to be famous, but can I point out our road to it was not absurd, exactly, but unthinkable, in the sense that we couldn't even imagine a way to do it? The London music scene was entirely insignificant, and we didn't even play the trad jazz (Charlie's métier), which dominated. Still, we practiced day and night out of some unspoken impetus, innocent suburban boys abruptly living quite near the edge of a dark milieu. This brings me to Brian, who played guitar very well and was a brittle devil. We knew that because of many things, not least that he spent an inappropriate amount of time beating up his girls in the next room. I'm not proud of that. Keith gives himself (too much, I think) credit for rescuing Anita, eventually, from Brian; but that of course was years later. Earlier, we both listened to or watched his cruelty, in the bedroom and elsewhere; we paid no attention to the half-dozen kids he'd fathered and ignored the savagery he accomplished on tour. We didn't know better; we were priapic jackals ourselves, fucking even one another's girlfriends if they got left, as it were, unattended. But it was wrong to have let Brian do that, and Keith should have owned up to this in the book. I supposed it is a karmic justice for Brian that we continued to watch as he descended from there to hell, harried by the police and increasingly incapacitated artistically, which further estranged him from us. Oh, that's not true; we didn't just watch. We ushered him along, ridiculing him, you might say, to death as he began to lose his ability to contribute. Again, we were young. What were you doing at 25? We didn't know about depression, insanity, addiction, or what acid might have done to him. It's unclear to me whether the drugs diminished his ability to contribute or whether the drugs were in effect a way to cover up something that wasn't there. The first song Keith and I wrote was a hit single; Brian couldn't write a song to save his life, literally. And let's remember that he was a total asshole. I'm digressing but I'm trying to explain where we came from. We didn't have a template. Nothing against Steven Tyler, but there's a difference. We felt around in the dark; we were famous within weeks; and, in the end, we left a body or two behind us. We did these things, good and bad, together; we were friends. The second important thing is Keith's talent. We took it for granted, in a way, as he says. We felt it was our duty to get together and write a song, one good song each day we worked. He is kind to say I could take what he gave me and run with it. But he is the one who gave me the actual song to write the lyrics to. He wrote a dozen Top 10 hits in five years, and, after the band added Mick Taylor and essentially grew up, he wrote most of Beggars Banquet and Let It Bleed. Again: What were you doing at 25? It's interesting to me how no previous song we'd recorded would have a respectable place on those albums; and any song on them would have seem out of place even on Aftermath or Between the Buttons. Keith's lurch forward was amazing. As a pure rock (not folk or pop) songwriter, I think he is not just without peer. I think he is unrivaled in depth and growth, from "As Tears Go By" to "Satisfaction" to "Jumping Jack Flash" to, I don't know, "Gimme Shelter. " "Monkey Man." "Street Fighting Man." The primal feel of the chording. The musicality of the intros and breaks. The innovation of the recording—cruder, no doubt, but I will argue far more emotionally powerful than the Beatles'. The winding, intermixed guitars he almost desperately loved. Without him, what would I have been? Peter Noone? It is hard to use a word like integrity about a band as compromised, as self-bloodied, as we were. But for some years, unlike any other group, the Beatles included, we declared war on that silly, hypocritical, repressive, and arbitrary society in which we lived. The only ammunition we had were Keith's songs. The lyrics, I confess now, may have been in their defiance just épater la bourgeoisie and in their poesy derivatively Zimmerman-esque. Even when they weren't, no one would have paid attention if the chords weren't arresting, irrefutable. The songs spoke primarily through their music, not their words. Keith's doting fans nattering on about the ultimate avatar of rock 'n' roll authenticity irritate me, it's true; but he may to this day be underappreciated. So those two things I think, are important. Our bond; his talent. We blink at that point, and go 40 years forward, and he has written a book that says, essentially, that I have a small dick. That I am a bad friend. That I am unknowable. The reviewers, who idolize Keith, don't ask why this is all in here. We have rarely spoken of such things publicly, and tangentially even then. We don't talk about it in private, either, and, no, he hasn't been in my dressing room in 20 years. I thought we both learned that there is no point in sharing anything at all with the press, save a few tidbits for the upbeat The Stones are back in top rocking form! article that accompanies each of our tours. I think Keith never appreciated the tedious hours I had to spend with Jann Wenner to accomplish that. But I know why it is all here. In the book we get the stories. Oh, the stories. The rock, the girls. The car wrecks, the arrests. You read them on the printed page, delivered in what, I must admit, is a pretty fair written representation of Keith's slightly tangential, drawling, effeminate delivery, resting charmingly just this side of the incomprehensible. I was generally made familiar with the stories in a different context. They were generally related by an assistant or a lawyer, tour manager or a publicist, poking their head into a room. Keith's disappeared. Keith's asleep backstage and can't be roused for the show. No one will wake him because he keeps a loaded gun under his pillow and grabs it and points when riled. Keith fell asleep in the studio again. No, Keith isn't mixing the album. He flew off to Jamaica, and, no, we don't know when he will be back. Keith's asleep. Keith's asleep. Keith's asleep. The scamp. Those are but one tier, and a fairly innocuous one, of the many times I was vouchsafed news of my partner. The next tier is more colorful. Keith (or his favorite sax player/drug runner/drug buddy/hanger-on) has slugged a photographer/destroyed a hotel room/gotten into a fistfight with the locals/fallen into a coma. Oh, yes, and the police are here. (Because police are whom you want backstage at a rock concert or at a recording studio.) Or: The bandmate Keith personally vouched for is freebasing again. This last was of some interest to me, because it meant that I got to sing at a stadium backed by not one but two guitarists falling over onstage. Keith likes to talk a lot about his getting clean from heroin. It is not correspondingly apprehended that he replaced the heroin comprehensively with liquor. Given a choice I select the slurring alcoholic over the comatose junkie as a lifelong professional partner, and I say this with some knowledge of the two alternatives. But neither is strictly desirable. And, yes, they do fall over onstage. (Or asleep on a chair in the studio.) I laugh at it now and blame no one but myself. Why, Keith gave me his "personal guarantee" Woody would not be freebasing on tour. And yet I was surprised when it happened. I take the point that professionalism, one's word, rock 'n' roll merriment … these are fungible things in our world. It is a fair charge that I have become less tolerant in these matters over the decades. In our organization, inside this rather unusual floating circus we call home, I am forced into the role of martinet, the one who gets blamed for silly arbitrary rules. (Like, for a show in front of 60,000 people for which we are being paid some $6 or $7 million for a few hours' work, I like to suggest to everyone that we start on time, and that we each have in place a personal plan, in whatever way suits us best, to stay conscious for the duration of the show.) So I will take that point. All of the forgoing was just … a little outré behavior on tour. Let's go to the next tier—again, of matters one is informed of with some regularity, this not over months, not years, but entire decades. Keith's been arrested with a mason jar full of heroin and a shopping bag full of other drugs and drug paraphernalia and is charged with drug trafficking. That was his baggage for a weekend in Toronto. It is hard to play a show with a catatonic guitarist, harder still when he is in jail for 10 years. I won't even get into the fact that this came right when I had every record label in the world fighting to sign us, and in an instant my negotiating power was vaporized. Here's a baroque bulletin from the archives: Anita's 17-year-old boyfriend has accidentally shot himself, in Keith's house—Keith's bedroom—with a gun Keith left lying around. Young Marlon, then perhaps 10, saw Anita, covered in blood, coming down the stairs distraught, and God knows it could have been Marlon playing with the gun. Or: Keith's driven his car off the road (again) with Marlon inside (again). In his book Keith stands back, amazed at the things that just … happen to him. He is frequently the victim of faulty wiring in the hotels in which we bivouac; a surprising number of times this phenomenon has caused fires. Ritz-Carltons are not built the way they use to be, I guess. Redlands burned down a couple of times as well, as did a house he was renting in Laurel Canyon. It's a wonder Marlon survived his childhood. A third child Keith disposed of by sending her off to his mum back in Dartford I to raise. The second? That was another son, who was left with his paranoid, unstable, heroin-addict mother and didn't make it past infancy. Keith says he blames himself, and on that at least I think we can agree. It is said of me that I act above the rest of the band and prefer the company of society swells. Would you rather have had a conversation with Warren Beatty, Andy Warhol, and Ahmet Ertegun … or Keith, his drug mule Tony, and the other surly nonverbal members of his merry junkie entourage? Keith actually seems not to understand why I would want my dressing room as far away as possible from that of someone who travels with a loaded gun. And for heaven's sake. No sooner did Keith kick heroin than Charlie took it up. In the book Keith blames me for not touring during the 1980s. I was quoted, unfortunately, saying words to the effect of "the Rolling Stones are a millstone around my neck." This hurt Keith's feelings. He thinks it was a canard flung from a fleeting position of advantage in my solo career, the failing of which he delights in. He's not appreciating the cause and effect. Can you imagine going on tour with an alcoholic, a junkie, and a crackhead? Millstone wasn't even the word. I spent much of the 1980s looking for a new career, and it didn't work. If I had it to do over again I would only try harder. When I came back I resolved to do at least something well. Which brings us to money. We did not entirely mismanage our career in the 1960s, save for the calamity of signing with Allen Klein, who, with fatal strokes of our pens, obtained the rights and total control of our work throughout the 1960s. It was my responsibility. Keith downplays this, but the fact is we signed the thief's papers. It was all done legally. Klein was a Moriarity, truly; he didn't wait to sign us to steal. The signing was the theft, a product of a scheme so encompassing that in the end, he paid us a pittance and walked off with our songs. This is by far the single most important nonmusical event in our history, and yet it is rarely remarked on. I was not 30 and had lost us a historic treasure. In the 1970s, we worked very hard, and with Some Girls we eventually sold a lot of records, but in reality you couldn't make much money back then, even touring. In the early 1970s we might play for a period of, say, two months, 10,000- and 20,000-seat halls at $6 or $10 a ticket. Back then, we were lucky to take half the gross home. You do the math. Then take out expenses and manager and lawyer fees ... and split the remainder five ways. Nor did we live frugally. It got better over the decade, and Keith and I had the songwriting, of course, but compare us with Paul or Elton during the 1970s (who outsold us by many times, for starters, and among other things did not split their income with anyone) and our fame was entirely inconsistent with our back accounts. In 1981, I put us in stadiums and charged a more reasonable tariff and might have made us more money that summer than we'd earned in our entire career up to that point. And I've done it several times since—each time, I mean, to be precise, literally earning close to as much as we had the previous 30 or 40 years in total, including those previous tours. The Bigger Bang outing grossed more than $588 million—more than a million dollars a day for 18 months—and we pocketed the lion's share of it. If the promoters didn't like it they could raise price of the nachos, or the parking. And I'm not even mentioning the sponsorships, the ticket fees, the merchandise … I sound, now, like the accountant who earns my bandmates' jeers. But I don't remember Keith complaining about these sums, or, incidentally, that it took me 20 years to remember to give Ronnie a full share, just as we both pretended not to hear when Mick Taylor, or Ronnie, asked for credit for songs they'd written. Does Keith really sigh for the good old days on tour? Shabby theaters, shitty sound? Wound-up kids standing for hours in the hot summer sun in dreadful mid-American cities waiting for a chance to race recklessly for general-admission seats? Us enduring a day of hassle and travel to take home perhaps $3,500 each? I remember Keith asleep or not showing up until hours after the scheduled start time. Our feral fans running, fighting, throwing rocks at police. Today, the shows start promptly, there are video screens for the folks in the back, and we offer $1,000-a-seat ducats for the fat cats. Here's the thing: I'm a rock star. What is the measure of my success if not the biggest rock and roll tour of all time? I know what you're thinking. It's what Keith thinks, too. What about the music. Isn't it all, in the end, about the music? I must note that the Stones rarely get a bad review, no matter how poor our albums. (Jann again, and so many wannabe Janns; how is it that we somehow manage, again and again, to record our "best album since Some Girls"?) But let me ask you to imagine yourself, as I was, unimaginably, partnered with the writer of "Satisfaction," "Paint It Black," "19th Nervous Breakdown," "Honky Tonk Woman," etc. And then imagine that your partner, seemingly overnight, lost some essential part of his talents. Not, as is commonly supposed, sometime perhaps in the 1980s, when the Rolling Stones' decline in creativity was on obvious display, but earlier. A lot earlier. Like, say, 1972 at the latest. Those who like Exile on Main St. like its denseness, its mystery, its swampy commitment. Accidentally and amid no little chaos, we conjured up something dirty, impenetrable, and, in parts, compelling. But I think its murk promises depths that aren't there. There are decent but no major songs on Exile. Let's go back an album, to Sticky Fingers. I wrote "Brown Sugar." Mick Taylor wrote "Sway" and most of "Moonlight Mile," and made "Can't You Hear Me Knocking" his own. Keith and I together did most of the rest, like "Wild Horses," but, in the end, he didn't write most of the thing's best songs. From there, there's Exile. Some nice tracks— "Rocks Off," "Happy"—but there is no "Gimme Shelter" or "Let It Bleed." Chords that once threatened society in some significant now way rarely radiated outward. The next few years were difficult. I don't want to say Keith wrote no songs. He did. But successively, in each album, the process became more difficult, as both his capacity for the job declined along with the quality of what he did write. He mocks the disco songs—"Hot Stuff," "Miss You," "Emotional Rescue." But what would the commercial impact of those albums have been without those immediate hits? We were being outsold by everyone from Supertramp to the Doobie Brothers as it was. At the same time I had to come up with tracks and weasel promising material out of our cohort and not give up songwriting credit, which I accomplished in all but one or two cases. The resulting albums are, with perhaps the exception of Some Girls, flaccid and unconvincing. The aforementioned disco hits. A little lyrical naughtiness ("Starfucker," "Some Girls"). The earnest ballad in which the incorrigible Stones display some unexpected touches of maturity ("Memory Motel," "Waiting on a Friend"). Lots and lots of undistinguished filler, clavinet playing by Billy Preston, Motown covers … And for some of the good stuff Keith wasn't even there. For It's Only Rock and Roll I did the title single with Woody and Bowie. Taylor and I constructed the splendid "Time Waits for No One," a fantasia, alluring to this day, for percussion, piano, and guitar. (I don't think Keith has ever let us play it live.) ("Sway," either.) I will testify that Keith was intermittently sentient during some part of the recording of Some Girls. Yes we were fully Manhattanized at this point, because I live here and that's what I found interesting. The geographic location of Keith's talent, being nowhere, wasn't available for evocation. By the time of Tattoo You I was exhausted. Entirely drained of ideas. I told Chris Kimsey to ransack the archives. "Start Me Up" was a very old song, with some 20, 30, 40 takes as a reggae ... and one with a real rock guitar. It turned out to be our last real hit, and the arc of our career would look a lot different if we hadn't found it. With it, we could plausibly least claim to be hitmakers in the 1980s. "Waiting on a Friend," that symbol of our new-found maturity, was, if memory serves, from a centuries-old session with me and Mick Taylor. About our work from the rest of the 1980s and 1990s, the less said the better. Can you sing a single chorus from Dirty Work? Name a single track? We certainly don't play songs from those records in concert if we can help it. I go into such detail to describe the arc of our decline accurately but also note this sad corollary: Keith brought something out of me, way back when. Through Exile, I felt I had to rise to his songs. When he checked out creatively, I lost something important. While there is some spark, I guess, in "Some Girls" or "Shattered" or whatever, however contrived, I know most of the other songs sucked. In the 1980s and '90s it got worse. I could conjure up only the most banal cliché or the most pretentious polysyllabic nonsense. Compare "Sympathy for the Devil" with "Heartbreaker." One Godard made a film about. The other is a TV movie. I literally wrote a song called "She's So Cold" and then, a few years later, one called "She Was Hot." Now, Keith went through the same thing. I think this is why Keith lost himself with heroin and now drinks: to stave off the pressure to match himself and dull the knowledge that he can't any more (and, back then, couldn't). It's trite, maybe, but there's a reason a guy spends a decade in a haze, and the three decades since in a stupor. Keith's rancor is almost entirely based on the fact that it was not, in the end, easy to keep the appearances of what in the public mind is the Rolling Stones, and the process wasn't always pretty. But I did it, and, among other things, to this day it is hardly in the public mind that Keith Richards hasn't written a significant rock 'n' roll song in nearly 35 years. For that I get Keith's book. Why did he write it? Or, rather, having decided to write it all down, why did he devote so much of it to carping about me? Well, he's not talking about me, really. He's just trying to get my attention, I think, in the end. The remaining part of the rancor comes from the fact that he knows he lost me, many years ago. It's funny—Keith doesn't write good rock songs much any more, but what he does do, every four or five years, is craft a beautiful little ballad. Since Tattoo You Keith's written and sung a couple of tracks per album. (We had a huge fight about his putting three on Bridges to Babylon; I didn't like it, but didn't have anything else to offer, even with three years since the previous album. Why one of the songs I did write is now co-credited to k.d. lang is a matter to be discussed on some other day. ) Generally, one of these is a throwaway, and the other ... is something gorgeous. Put them all together along with songs he wrote solo and sang from the early years—"You Got the Silver," "Happy," and so forth, all the way up to "Thru & Thru" and "All About You"—and you have a CD of no little power and emotion. (I've done it.) These songs are more honest than his book. In "The Worst," he says something about "I'm the worst kind of guy/ For you to be around." That's a song that might ring true for many people. It makes me think about how Keith lost me only after I lost him. In an older song, he explains a worldview I find a bit disturbing, and I would like to point out that since from most peoples' perspective I have flirted the edge of total decadence my entire life I can make that observation with some authority: Slipped my tongue in someone else's pie Tasted better every time She turned green and tried to make me cry Being hungry Ain't no crime Again, the honesty is bracing. I think Keith puts just about any of his manifold urges on a par with hunger, and I think we can agree the world would be a dangerous place if that was the norm. It explains many, many of his actions over the years. In the book he tells the story of going to meet Patti Hansen's parents for the first time—drunk, holding an open bottle of Jack, and with one of his fucktard friends in tow. You can imagine how the evening ended. I'm sure Keith thinks it's OK. ("Being nervous ain't no crime.") ("Oh, shut up, Keith," I think.) With that perspective—and the added benefit of being rich and famous and having most of his deplorable actions do nothing but burnish his image—Keith's way in the world has been, in a certain way and ignoring, for the moment, the people who died, a blessed one. I certainly bless it. I stood by him and propped him up and didn't fire his ass for many, many years. It would have ended the Stones, of course, so maybe I was being selfish. In a way, even comatose he had a marquee name; as my meal ticket, you might say, it suited me to let him doze. I took the reins until, when he finally woke up, he found that he had no place in the management. He's angry about that, too. Yes, let's let Keith Richards have a hand in overseeing an operation that generates $1 million a day in revenue. I don't know what else I could have done. Later, one grows older and becomes more informed about such things, and I saw I was supposed to have held an elaborate ceremony called an "intervention." Society could have effectively halted the upheavals of the 1960s simply by requiring all of us to "intervene" with one another. In any event, considering half our circle was on heroin and the rest were coke fiends, I think it wouldn't have efficacious in our circumstances. He talks about me, too, in his solo songs, less subtly: "I'm so sick and tired/ Of hanging around/ Jerks like you." People ask me why I let him put these on the album. I think: Oh, why not? It's a great song, and he can sing it, and he can write the book, too. He's trying to get my attention. To connect. To have it be how it once was. At our age, I think there's no basis for it. Keith celebrates his own unchanging character, and I have had quite enough of that. But, still, when I think of Keith, I think sometimes of how someone different from the book comes out through these songs. Once in a great while he detaches and looks down at his corporeal self. "I think I lost my touch," he sings on one of them; "It's just another song and it's slippin' away." Rock and roll is strange. When a song is beautiful—those spare guitars rumbling and chiming, by turns—the words mean so much more, and there, for a moment, I believe him, and feel for him. Or I think about "How Can I Stop" which may end up being Keith's last great song. "How can I stop … once I start?" he murmurs, over and over again. "How can I stop once I start?" It's about rock 'n' roll, of course, and playing guitar, and his tenure, and mine, in our unusual coalition. It's also about heroin and everything else he can't stop ingesting. But again it's about Keith himself, who once started never did stop—through the fame, the songs, the concerts and the women and the drugs; and the violence and senselessness, the addictions and the deaths, the ruined lives, the petty and large-scale cruelties. At the end Keith got Wayne Shorter to do a sax solo that is itself almost an out-of-body experience, perhaps the loveliest moment on one of our records. It goes on and on over the last two minutes of a very long track, and the end is almost a … an exaltation, perhaps? I am lost there. It's something I'm not sure I ever saw evidenced in real life, and something that isn't in his book. It's the sound—or at least the closest thing Keith Richards will ever admit to it—of a conscience. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Nov 5th, 2010 at 10:53am
Is this for real??
I find it hard to believe Mick would take the time to write such a LONG and detailed "rebuttal". Interesting................. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 5th, 2010 at 11:09am Thanks for posting, moy. Authentic or not - doubtless the latter - a very well written and thought provoking read by a journalist who knows his facts. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Nov 5th, 2010 at 11:25am
If Mick didn't write this he should have. Right on, well said, and about fucking time.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Nov 5th, 2010 at 11:53am
What a load of rubbish. Of course Mick never wrote it, i doubt he would waste his time. Infomatively written, but pointless.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by polytoxic on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:13pm
It's fiction - the journalist Bill Wyman cops to it in his comments section - but it's well done.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:32pm
actually very introspective....well written and extremely interesting approach......reading it however sadly reminds me of how close to the end we really are
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:41pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:32pm:
True, gk, but think how AMAZING it is that in spite of all of the drama between these two, they have remained a working band for 50 years!! I have always said we are the luckiest fans on the Planet and I feel moreso now. One more tour to cap it off will be PURE ICING for me. I will treasure any and every show I am lucky enough to attend. I suddenly feel a lump in my throat. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:53pm Of course this "story" is now all over the interwebs... Mick Jagger Responds To Keith Richards’ “Life” With relatively little fanfare, considering, Slate has posted the Rolling Stones’ Mick Jagger’s response to “Life” the recent autobiography by Stones’ guitarist Keith Richards. Though it purports to have been “accidentally” mailed to music journalist Bill Wyman rather than its assigned destination, the Stones bassist of the same name, some might find that little piece of serendipity a bit hard to swallow. Regardless, its a fascinating window into the two artist’s history together and a compelling read. Jagger writes with a flowery, highly literate style, and spares no one his criticism and occasional disgust. — Jon Behm reviler.org |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:57pm LadyJane wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:41pm:
LJ you are so right....it's just that the Stones have been so huge in my life for all of those 50 years since I was 10 and chose them as my band. Guess theres a bit of my own mortality seeping in too and hoping this great ride has a few more hair raising curves left....... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 5th, 2010 at 1:33pm LadyJane wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 10:53am:
The use of the word 'fucktard' would suggest it may have been written by a certain right-wing DJ from New Jersey who frequents this parish. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 5th, 2010 at 1:39pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:53pm:
Jesus wept. The publication of Keith's memoirs really has produced a race to the death amongst journalists on both sides of the Atlantic for the Utter Fuckwittery Stakes. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:05pm Gazza wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 1:33pm:
You've got to be kidding, Gazza. Not in a million years. Too well written. Riffy didn't write this anymore than Mick Jagger but cheers from this corner to whoever did for the points raised. And no offense to hardcore Keith fans intended. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:16pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:57pm:
I could not have said it better myself gk. To quote the greatest songwriting team of all time, "Time waits for no one, and it won't wait for me." |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:26pm
Not sure where this is from, by my Cousin just posted this on my Facebook page:
"The author comments: Thanks again for all the great comments. I intended the piece to be just a book review, but also a piece of press criticism--it was odd to me how many of the reviews took everything Richards sa...id at face value, and repeated, merrily, stories that were actually a bit grim. I tried to finesse it, but "grade school" *is* a great catch. I grew up in the punk generation, and of course one had to immediately hate Mick Jagger after years of uncritically loving him. But I would not have wanted to be tied to the hip to Richards for the past forty years." |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SweetVirginia on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:33pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 12:32pm:
The guy did a good job of writing something that certainly could have been written by Mick. And he added just enough little flourishes to make it sound plausible....like dropping in the phrase épater la bourgeoisie. It made me sad to read it because so much of it is true, even though Mick didn't write it. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SweetVirginia on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:34pm LadyJane wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:26pm:
It's from the comments section below the article at Slate. Readers are chiding him on the stuff he got wrong that gave away the ruse. They said that Mick would never say "grade school". |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SoulPlunderer on Nov 5th, 2010 at 3:40pm SweetVirginia wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:34pm:
Well he may say grade school if he was talking to an American audience but this is meant for Bill Wyman allegedly so he would stick to the English terms that he is more familiar with. On Gazza's earlier point, how long do you think it'll be before this "review" appears in some form in the Daily Mail, presented as fact? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by polytoxic on Nov 5th, 2010 at 3:45pm [/quote] On Gazza's earlier point, how long do you think it'll be before this "review" appears in some form in the Daily Mail, presented as fact?[/quote] A few hours probably, unless Contactmusic does it first. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Riffhard on Nov 5th, 2010 at 5:20pm
I must say that reading it does give this Keef fan a completely different perspective. I knew it wasn't Mick when he copped to the fact that Taylor wrote Sway and "most of Moonlight Mile". However, it certainly paints a pretty vivid picture of what Mick has been dealing with these past several decades. I would love to see how Jagger would have reacted to it. My guess is that for the most part he would like to buy that man a drink!
Oh, and Ginda, I take exception to your crack about the quality of my writing. You may not agree with what I post, but I'll put my posts up against anyone's on this board as far as quality goes. In many cases I would lord it over the heads of many of people who so knee jerkingly disagree with me based on nothing more than their so called "progressive" ideology. Riffy |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Nov 5th, 2010 at 5:31pm Riffhard wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 5:20pm:
Don't get upset, Riffy. I can think of only 5 people (3 of whom no longer post here) with the writing skills and knowledge to have pulled this off had they been so inclined. You AND I are not among those 5. It has nothing to do with politics and my response to Gazza was not intended as a crack against you. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by lavendar on Nov 5th, 2010 at 5:35pm
Slate Hmm Slash
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gotdablouse on Nov 5th, 2010 at 5:52pm
Damn, that thing me shiver, well researched but at the end there is nothing new and that wiseguy doesn't know they did did up playing Sway live, he also confused the order of the Keith's kids.
All in all a bit unfortunate to bring the "Mick stuff" up again because for all the "pre-publicity" the book is much more than that, just that Keith leaves things hanging as we've discussed before. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 5th, 2010 at 7:50pm Ginda wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:05pm:
I was. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 5th, 2010 at 7:56pm LadyJane wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 2:26pm:
the whole article is full of Americanisms. No Englishman would have written it, hence my remark about the term 'fucktard'. Also, "Yes we were fully Manhattanized at this point, because I live here and that's what I found interesting"... Mick hasn't lived in New York for years...so the use of the present tense is a bit of a dead giveaway. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Nov 6th, 2010 at 9:54am
Drum roll.... :areyoufuckingserious Thank you Charlie.
Boys and Girls I give you the lastest New York Times Bestseller List: Hardcover Nonfiction Top 5 at a Glance 1. LIFE, by Keith Richards with James Fox 2. BROKE, by Glenn Beck and Kevin Balfe 3. EARTH (THE BOOK), by Jon Stewart and others 4. THE LAST BOY, by Jane Leavy 5. AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MARK TWAIN, VOL. 1, by Mark Twain WAY TO GO KEEF . |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 6th, 2010 at 12:17pm SoulPlunderer wrote on Nov 5th, 2010 at 3:40pm:
I'll go further than that. There's a quote from a Stones 'source' saying that despite Keith's recent comments, there are no concrete plans for a tour next year. With that story being open to misinterpretation, just throw the 'Mick pens a lengthy diatribe against Keith's autobiopgraphy' story into the mix and within a few days some idiot will be putting the two together and telling us the band are on the verge of splitting up and will never tour again. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by SoulPlunderer on Nov 6th, 2010 at 1:27pm Gazza wrote on Nov 6th, 2010 at 12:17pm:
Of course there's no official plans to tour yet, the fucking meeting isn't until December, Keith just said that a tour will probably happen/he wants it to happen. But yeah, we'll get the usual shite from the Mail. Btw, there was two page spread criticizing Keith and Anita in the Mail today (my grandparents buy it for some reason!) but I couldn't really bring myself to read it. They're still claiming that earlier in the week is the first time Keith and Angela have been seen together though. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 7th, 2010 at 12:17pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 7th, 2010 at 12:53pm SoulPlunderer wrote on Nov 6th, 2010 at 1:27pm:
Obviously the multi-page spread on her wedding in 1998 that was featured in 'Hello' magazine and which sold millions of copies passed them by.... Not to mention Doris' funeral in 2007... Clueless, Nazi-sympathizing, lying bastards. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Nov 10th, 2010 at 6:16am
Rolling Stones: No Plans to Tour or Record
Andrew Vaughan | 11.08.2010 A spokesman for The Rolling Stones has denied that the band has plans to tour or record in 2011, contrary to Keith Richards’ recent comments. The Guardian reports that, after Keith Richards told BBC6Music that the band were ready to tour next year, an official statement from the band’s press office said instead: “There are no concrete plans for The Rolling Stones to tour. The same applies to rumors that they are going into the studio soon to record a new album.” Speaking at the book launch of his new memoir, Life, Richards had told BBC6Music: “After these many years working together, we have a lot of unfinished stuff to work on that we had to leave off the last album. And knowing Mick, as I do, he’s a very prolific writer. I have ideas and we’ll put them together in December or January. We’re looking forward to working.” Loading comments... Problems loading Disqus? http://www.gibson.com/en-us/Lifestyle/News/rolling-stones-1108/ |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 10th, 2010 at 6:59am
They would say that, wouldnt they?
The standard fobbing off comment that's been used for many years. An 'intention' or an 'aspiration' isn't an 'announcement' and everything's denied until it's officially confirmed. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Nov 10th, 2010 at 7:20am
I presume this is a FAKE Keith Richards dancing with Angela at her Wedding?
And let's not forget the rally to Save St. Richards Hospital. Figment of our imaginations below: Need a fact checked about The Rolling Stones?? Rocks Off will provide it for ya 8-) LJ. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 10th, 2010 at 8:39am Keith's alleged to have had a little dust-up with a Swedish reporter yesterday in Paris: Keith Richards hit me in the head http://ss11i01.stream.ip-only.net/images/blog/images/entries/70/60/45/122117/5ef53cb0477f3837 English version of the Keith Richards article in Aftonbladet November 10th, 2010: On August 4, 2007, The Rolling Stones, got a 2 out of 5 review for the gig at Ullevi in Gothenburg, Sweden, of tabloid Aftonbladets music reviewer Markus Larsson, 34. A review that enraged guitarist Keith Richards, 67. Afterwards, he demanded a public apology. Yesterday, the two met for an interview at Le Meurice Hotel in Paris about Keith Richards's autobiography "Life". The meeting ended with the rock star threatening Markus Larsson and hitting him in the head. - Before he stormed out he hit me in the head and hissed: "You're lucky to get out of here alive," said Markus Larsson. The interview would have lasted for half an hour, but when, after ten minutes of the interview Keith Richards realized it was Markus Larsson, who wrote the review, the mood of the rock star quickly changed. - He was in a good mood before I started to ask about the gig at Ullevi. He drank something yellow and smoked and laughed. But it quickly became uncomfortable, said Markus Larsson. It even went so far as to Keith Richards physically threatening Markus Larsson. - His eyes got black and he was absolutely furious. He stood up and asked if we would put out the lights and settle the disagreement straight away. What did you feel? - At first I was just surprised, I thought he was pulling my leg, but then I realized he was serious and then I felt uncomfortable and I just wanted to get out of there pretty fast. Markus Larsson has been a music reviewer for eleven years but has never experienced anything like this. - Right now, I cannot see the funny side of this. I would like to experience a lot in my life but I do not want to end up in a scuffle with anyone I interview, he says. Fanny Birath is public relations manager at Norstedts, publishers of Keith Richards's autobiography: - It is sad what happened, but I can not comment on their conflict. It was between them in a closed room and I was not there, she says. Klas Lindberg, head of entertainment news at Aftonbladet: - Keith Richards behavior is completely unacceptable. That he would be so hostile and aggressive towards our employee in this quiet and controlled interview situation, was surprising and extremely uncomfortable. Attacking a journalist in this way is serious. Richards is clearly out of balance and I hope that people close to him reacts, he says. By: Martin Gustafsson Aftonbladet Hmm. Keith being 67 might not be the only factual inaccuracy. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Nov 10th, 2010 at 9:50am left shoe shuffle wrote on Nov 10th, 2010 at 8:39am:
Have a sauna and relax....form what I heard about some of the Euro gigs at that time 2/5 may have been generous. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by open-g on Nov 10th, 2010 at 2:27pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 10th, 2010 at 9:50am:
:forfucksake Have a sauna and relax.. That's exactly what I would tell that sleazy tabloid scumbag who comes back home whining and complaining that Keith nearly hit him on the head. Keith didn't even touch him or else it would be rape / murder allover the press by now. why should Keith be polite to a rat - wether he's 66, 67 or 20 y/old? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 10th, 2010 at 3:19pm Great little interview from the Dutch TV program 'De Wereld Draait Door'. Keith drops a couple of hilarious bon mots. Segment is about 17 minutes in... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 10th, 2010 at 3:24pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 10th, 2010 at 5:08pm
Keith had every right to be pissed. What were aftonbladet playing at by sending the same journalist to interview him from whom he'd demanded an apology 3 years earlier?
It was quite obvious that they were trying to set up some kind of confrontation that would give them a story. Sounds like they got it.And from what I've been led to believe, the story that Keith 'hit' the guy is a serious exaggeration (no surprise there) I doubt Keith will lose any sleep over it. Nor should he. Larsson, meanwhile, gets to shit his pants and might think twice about abusing his position and spewing bile and lies about someone in future. Result. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 10th, 2010 at 5:45pm
Keith Richards' Rep Denies Violence Claims
Swedish journalist alleges Richards attacked him during interview By Jem Aswad Nov 10, 2010 5:14 PM EST Keith Richards reportedly threatened and attacked a Swedish journalist during an interview at a Paris hotel Tuesday — though his representative denied to Rolling Stone that any violence had occurred. According to online translations of an article in the Swedish-language publication Aftonbladets, Richards, who was promoting his memoir Life, became hostile when he realized that the paper's interviewer, Markus Larsson, was the man who had given a Rolling Stones concert a bad review after a 2007 concert in Gothenburg, Sweden, describing them as "amateurs." Richards reportedly demanded a public apology for the review, as he had after the concert reviews were published. Tuesday's meeting "ended with the rock star threatening Markus Larsson and hitting him in the head," the article claims, adding that Richards said, "You're lucky to get out of here alive" to Larson before he left. However, a spokesperson for Richards says that the allegations against the singer were false. "At the conclusion of the 20 minute interview Keith Richards jokingly tapped the journalist on the head after his questions got a bit silly," Richards' spokesperson tells Rolling Stone. "From the people in the room during the interview they would suggest that the writer has allowed his imagination to get the better of him." http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/51942/232678 maybe Keith should have 'showed him the blade....' :wtf1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 10th, 2010 at 8:39pm Gazza wrote on Nov 10th, 2010 at 5:08pm:
Not for nothing, but whyinhell was Aftonbladet - let alone the guy who'd previously skewered Keith - granted an interview at all? Seems likely that someone in the Keith camp failed to do their due diligence and whiffed on the payback F.U. End result is a splashy tabloid headline and a denial that should've never been necessary... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 11th, 2010 at 9:46am left shoe shuffle wrote on Nov 10th, 2010 at 8:39pm:
Wasn't The Gothenberg show a real mess? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 11th, 2010 at 10:14am left shoe shuffle wrote on Nov 10th, 2010 at 8:39pm:
Yep. Some very lax 'screening' there on the part of Keith's people as well. Yesterday's 'hurricane' has now been downgraded to a 'storm' - or rather the 'attack' has now been re-classified as 'a little push'. Maybe their lawyers got a bit nervous. From today's 'aftonbladet' (not exactly a neutral source, admittedly) - translation by Svartmer on IORR . I love the way the guy opens the questioning by talking about the reviewer as if it was another person : Question: I have to ask you. A couple of years ago you played in Gothenburg and got a lukewarm review from a Swedish critic. Answer: Oh, you mean the man from Gothenburg? He put me down even before I played Gothenburg. And when I wanted to see him he already had left the town. I hate cowards. Q: Well... A: He has a malevolent pen. He doesn´t like me. One day I want to meet him in a dark room. Q: But I, eh. A: It´s not you? Q: Yes. And I´m not a coward. (Keith slams his glass down on the table) A: It´s you! Q: Yes, it´s me. A: So you are the man who hates me? Q: No, I don´t hate you. A: (Keith rises) Let´s turn out the lights here and now. You´ve really been writing a lot of shit about me. Q: I wanted to come here and look in your eyes and... A: So it´s you. Why am I talking to you? You´re full of shit. When I wanted to talk to you, you ran away. Q: No, I didn´t. And I´m here now. A: What do you want? Slit my throat? Q: I don´t want to fight. I want to explain... A: On what did you base your review? Q: I didn´t think the show lived up to my expectations. But I stand for it and I... Q: Funny thing that no one else felt the way you did. So now it´s personal. Now we say goodbye. (Keith gives the reporter´s head a little push). Consider yourself lucky to get out from here alive. (Keith quickly leaves the room) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Nov 11th, 2010 at 10:18am Pdog wrote on Nov 11th, 2010 at 9:46am:
It got mixed reviews, as did a lot of shows. The guy did praise Jagger's performance, but I dont think it helped matters by his sweeping assumption that Keith was basically drunk. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 11th, 2010 at 11:53am Larsson's review of the 07 Gothenburg show did indeed give Mick high marks. Keith, on the other hand, was referred to as "a little confused", "broken" and "old". It also mentioned that his playing, while not as bad as the previous show in Helsinki, was still "a bit at random" and he was no longer the group's "engine". Pretty scathing, and imo not hard to see why it drew Keith's ire then and now... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by mojoman on Nov 11th, 2010 at 12:09pm
And I wish life could be
Swedish magazines I wish life could be Swedish magazines I wish life could be Anything Ugh! Aie! Aie! Aie! Ugh! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Holden on Nov 11th, 2010 at 6:03pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Nov 11th, 2010 at 11:53am:
But the review was pretty much spot-on, and Keith shouldn't get pissed at a critic for sharing his honest opinion. I was often surprised at how good the reviews were for the latter part of the tour to be honest. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Nov 12th, 2010 at 7:23am
So it appears KEEF reads the reviews, cares about what they say about him, and also holds a grudge! It surprises me, I would assume KEEF didnt give a fvck what anyone in the world says about him. Apparently KEEF is a sensitive man! Who woulda thought???
:wtf1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by nankerphelge on Nov 12th, 2010 at 8:23am |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Nov 12th, 2010 at 9:44am
Mick Dick update.........
Groupie 'satisfied' with Jagger By WENN.COM Pamela Des Barres. (Supplied photo) Infamous rock groupie Pamela Des Barres has defended Mick Jagger after Keith Richards questioned the size of his manhood, insisting she got "plenty of satisfaction" in bed with the frontman. In his explosive memoirs, Life, Richards mocks his Rolling Stones bandmate, claiming speculation the rocker is well-endowed is false and insisting Jagger's one-time girlfriend Marianne Faithfull "had no fun with his tiny todger (penis)". But Des Barres, who has written two books about her romps with Jagger and other rock 'n' roll legends, wants to set the record straight. She says, "I beg to differ with Keith on the sexual prowess of his lead singer. In all ways (including size) I got plenty of satisfaction. The todger isn't tiny after all, dolls. And you can trust the world's most famous groupie!" |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 12th, 2010 at 11:49am Markus Larsson was on "The Schulman Show" - oddly enough, an Aftonbladet web TV program - and played the audio of the Paris interview. Segment is about 9 minutes in. Keith quite presciently predicts "You're gonna have a field day with this..." |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Nov 12th, 2010 at 12:30pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 12th, 2010 at 9:44am:
Miss Pamela knows all... [smiley=wink.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Nov 12th, 2010 at 12:41pm
I googled "slut" and her face popped up........
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Nov 12th, 2010 at 12:54pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 12th, 2010 at 12:41pm:
What an ungallant remark, sir... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 12th, 2010 at 3:27pm Bitch wrote on Nov 12th, 2010 at 7:23am:
Keith definitely can hold a grudge... it's interesting, I like the way he's brutally honest towards folks in his book... he describes things he loves and hates about people... it might sting a little for some people, but his flattery and his condemnations seem sincere... I defintely get the feeling, with certain ideas, Keith is resolved, like Taylor quitting or the way Mick and Bill fucked to keep score... He's not super harsh on himself, but he does seem to understand he has lived most of his adult life in a bubble, and he remarks on himself a little harsh at times, but I think his ego jumps out, understandbly. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gorda on Nov 12th, 2010 at 3:37pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 12th, 2010 at 12:41pm:
Ha! Ha! Ha! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 12th, 2010 at 5:31pm
I don't think Pamela was a groupie... from what you read in Keith's book and other books, groupies were about music and mothering these wounded, albiet self inflicted, touring rockers. In alot of instances, it wasn't even about sex...
I'm not going to judge her sex life... it's lame to think a woman can't be racking up numbers like the guys... I do think her motives were selfish... She was the type Keith passed over, and I would've too... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Nov 13th, 2010 at 9:23am Ginda wrote on Nov 12th, 2010 at 12:54pm:
Ungallant?....maybe I will need to google that..I could care less who she had sex with but the constant yapping about it in the press or a book to preserve a tad of relevancy is past pathetic |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Nov 13th, 2010 at 10:46am gimmekeef wrote on Nov 12th, 2010 at 12:41pm:
You mean Paris Hilton didn't? :blankfriggingstare1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Nov 13th, 2010 at 10:54am
LIVE from the NYPL: KEITH RICHARDS in conversation with Anthony DeCurtis
Great stuff... [/quote] Thank you for that link, :booze No good, can't speak, wound up, no sleep. Sky diver insider her, skip rope, stunt flyer. Wounded lover, got no time on hand. One last cycle, thrill freak Uncle Sam. Pause for bus'ness, hope you'll understand. Judge and jury walk out hand in hand. Dietrich movies, close up boogies, Kissing cunt in Cannes. Grotesque music, million dollar sad. Got no tactics, got no time on hand. Left shoe shuffle, right shoe muffle, Sinking in the sand. Fade out freedom, steaming heat on, Watch that hat in black. Finger twitching, got no time on hand. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on Nov 13th, 2010 at 3:55pm
Best rock bio ever, now get off your lazy ass Keith and go make some music
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 13th, 2010 at 5:03pm Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll wrote on Nov 13th, 2010 at 3:55pm:
as much as the stones are vital to keith, i agree, he should be recording music. if mick isn't around, no big deal. you can't take it with you keef... i know there's some producers out there like rubin or lanois who could squeeze shot out of keith that would probably make every living musician feel like they suck!!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Wild Bill on Nov 13th, 2010 at 10:17pm Gazza wrote on Nov 10th, 2010 at 5:08pm:
Don't fuck with Keith! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dv1bM0pp_o4 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by robpop on Nov 13th, 2010 at 10:34pm Wild Bill wrote on Nov 13th, 2010 at 10:17pm:
The way Keith so lamely swung and made contact with that dude's head, and never fazed him or broke Keith's guitar, has generated interest from the Pittsburgh Pirates. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 13th, 2010 at 11:03pm robpop wrote on Nov 13th, 2010 at 10:34pm:
he follows cricket... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on Nov 14th, 2010 at 1:52pm Pdog wrote on Nov 13th, 2010 at 5:03pm:
Truer words have not been spoken, personally I would love to see Rubin get a hold of Keith and do an American recordings style album. It would be a fitting swan song from one of the last elder statesmen of rock n roll, and probably the most inspired thing to come out of the Stones camp in over 20 years |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 14th, 2010 at 6:29pm Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll wrote on Nov 14th, 2010 at 1:52pm:
I think the reason this isn't happening, is b/c, as he describes in his book, he doesn't know how to work alone when writting. But once he gets going, he can't stop... If Mick ain't there, and the fued got the wino's going... No one is pushing him or even asking him to work... and Mick won't work with Rubin, or probably anybody besides Don Was... not that Keith cares, but maybe he hasn't been told... Dude, you're going to be gone, what do you want to be your last bit of work? Think about it... If Rubin got him, alone for 3 to 6 months... oh many... Britania Recordings, actualy, Britmerica.... it would be aweosme, alot of covers, some self penned works, he could get anyone he asked to join in... Fuck Keef... do it, before you croak or can't work anymore... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll on Nov 14th, 2010 at 8:36pm Pdog wrote on Nov 14th, 2010 at 6:29pm:
I know this topics the 400 lb gorilla in the room, but I often wonder to what extent his lack of creative output over the past 10 years has been due to his arthritic condition. Have you noticed his hands in any of the recent interviews he's done? They're totally deformed, looks like he's got ET fingers. He should wear gloves in public. I don't know how he manages to do all the concerts. I think I've heard he takes shots, but I would think that his condition has got to be a major factor in his being able to function as a musician |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 14th, 2010 at 9:25pm Mr. Sex Drugs Rock n Roll wrote on Nov 14th, 2010 at 8:36pm:
not mentioned at all in the book... he looks fine when he plays. his skills that have diminished, seemed sparodic too. There's time when his playing has been amazing, while other times he's messing up. booze, ages, not feeling it... one thing is obvious, his hands look weird, and something is going on with them... for some reason, if it was a problem, i tend think he would talk about it, but who knows... his ego may not allow for that... what he's lost as far as ability, seems to be far less than when he just doesn't seem to click... and after reading the book, he's hurt himself a bunch, and it seems that it damaged his psyche and in that sense, getting older is a factor. you just don't bounce back, and it takes a toll emotionally... and that's what i think Keith needs, is something to stir him... actually I think he's been stirred, the book was part of it... what he needs is a partner... and Jagger is just so bent on business and show, that he forgot about the art and the passion... if Jagger just went into writing without giving a fuck about what the tour will be like and what he is going to wear, I think Keith would respond much better and the songs would show it... like Keith said, they are a long way from being thrown into that kitchen and told to write a song... then again, if they had the balls to put themsleves in a situation, with a rpoducer who put them to task, the results could be amazing... and the irony is, they want to be amazing, without forcing it... simple, but not easy! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Egon on Nov 15th, 2010 at 4:48am
cheers!!!
Egon |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 15th, 2010 at 6:21pm Keith was today's CNN 'Connector Of The Day'. Interview was taped at Waterstone's, and includes some questions submitted by fans. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 15th, 2010 at 7:15pm
Having my experience with drugs, i am amazed that keith never mainlined or smoked cocine or injected it.... he was still very much addicted, and by all his actions, he is an addict/alcoholic... yet he is one amazing example of someone who somehow exerted more willpower than most, in order to not go over the edge at crucial times in his life... the only explanation, is probably his relationship with rastas, and having some sort of connection to a spiritual life, and that he wasn't completely selfish and self absorbed....
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by The Wick on Nov 15th, 2010 at 7:27pm
I find it interesting that Keith has been a lot more conciliatory towards Mick in these recent interviews. He almost seems like he's going out of the way to compliment Mick, although not obviously.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 15th, 2010 at 8:52pm The Wick wrote on Nov 15th, 2010 at 7:27pm:
in the book keith seemed to compliment jagger alot... he pointed out stuff, that as a fan i could see. like how jagger craved stardom, at the expense of being an artist and creative, and was willing to burn his bandmates and his legacy... and how you have the many faces of jagger, and you never know if it is mick jagger or mick trying to be mick jagger... keith also pointed out the thing about jagger that has always pissed me off. how in interviews, he is so defensive and evasive, sometimes it works, but alot of the time it is really disssapointing, like he can't be bothered. there's no reason for it. for as vain as mick is, as much as he likes to entertain, it's weird how he goes out of his way to do this sort of sabotage. i can remember being excited for a jager interview, only to be wondering why her's acting like this music thing is his second job, and waiting for him to suddenly say something like, i am really doing this other thing, that's why i am not into talking about my music and band...and, i don't forget, it was Mick who didn't want to tour in the 80's and went behind peoples backs to go solo... keith didn't hold back his feelings then or now... and i was glad when jaggers attempt failed, it was lame... and it says alot that keith put together to very good albums and tours without jagger... and unlike jagger, he wasn't covering the stones... without keith richard, mick jagger is a very successful english business person. keith was going to be a musician his entire life, no matter what... i love jagger, think he is great, as a young kid, i worshipped him, wanted to be like him... but now... he's not even my 2nd favorite memeber of the band... he's held them back from touring in the 80's, and up until exile re-issue, is a big reason why we haven't seen more vault releases... if anything, i think keith's book was a call to mick to remember, the rolling stones should come first, and as much as you can, it's the old stuff that still drives them today... and you can still be creative and maintain the legacy... what happens next, will be Jaggers real rsponse... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Nov 16th, 2010 at 7:03am
Pdog.....wish it was true but I have a feeling there's a greater chance of Mick inviting Lady Do Do into the studio before he grinds out some classic new Stones with Keith
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 16th, 2010 at 10:19am Keith interview translated from FrankfurterRundschau: "If I meet the devil, God help him" Keith Richards and Mick Jagger in 2003 in Munich's Olympic Stadium. Photo: Joerg Koch / ddp "We look forward to this coming June, then we go on tour together." |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on Nov 16th, 2010 at 12:12pm gimmekeef wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 7:03am:
they both need to be locked in a kitchen, somewhere in the winter, with very little heat and told by a producer, give me some work if you want food, otherwise enjoy sitting in there... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by corgi37 on Nov 22nd, 2010 at 6:46am |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 22nd, 2010 at 8:32am Win a signed copy of Keith Richards’ autobiography ‘Life’ Sign up here to win a signed copy of Keith Richards’ autobiography ‘Life’ Closing Date: 10th December 2010 Winners will be notified by email within a week after closing date rollingstones.com |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 22nd, 2010 at 8:41am Book Review Podcast: Keith Richards November 19, 2010 This week: A conversation with Keith Richards about the Rolling Stones and his new memoir, “Life” |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Nov 24th, 2010 at 2:00pm
A little of the subject of the book, here's Rolling Stone 11 Greatest Rock Feuds, Mick & Keith head it.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/photos/53622/235943/0 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 5:05pm A not-so-complimentary view of Keith and one of the darker episodes mentioned in Life: Gimme Shelter: Keith Richards Still Raging Over Scott Cantrell Suicide Chris Epting Contributor (Dec. 1) -- Keith Richards' autobiography, "Life," is an international best seller and, as David Fricke of Rolling Stone calls it, "one of the greatest rock memoirs ever." As a Stones junkie since the age of 11, I was eager to read the book, and in a lot of ways I think it's very good. But something jumped out at me -- sickeningly -- on pages 419 and 420. In the passage, the 66-year-old rock legend recounts the apparent suicide that took place at his South Salem, N.Y., home in 1979. While he and the band were in Europe, 17-year-old Scott Cantrell shot himself in the head while allegedly playing Russian roulette in bed with Anita Pallenberg, Keith's infamous paramour and mother of several of his children. It was shocking news then, and reading Keith's account years later, I can't believe how brutally unkind he is toward the poor kid. I grew up in the South Salem area, and I remember meeting Cantrell, not long before his death. I'm sure it's easy to rage against a guy who slept with your wife. But it's years later, and Keith wasn't exactly known as Mr. Fidelity. Indeed, "Life" doesn't deal with death very well. At the time, according to the book, Keith and Anita were rich and powerful enough to get as high as they needed while remaining safe and sound within their protective rock 'n' roll womb. And though they had two young kids, parenthood did little to stem the nearly endless tide of shady characters, needles, pills and powders. Chris Epting This is the former Richards residence in South Salem, N.Y., where the suicide took place. "Things went beyond the point of return with Anita when her young boyfriend blew his brains out in our house. ... The boy had shot himself in the face, playing Russian roulette, the story goes," Keith writes. "I had met him. He was this crazy little kid, aged seventeen, Anita's boyfriend. I said to her, listen, baby, I'm leaving, we're over, we're finished, but this is not the guy for you. And he proved it. The reason she went with this guy, who was an absolute prick, was, I think, to piss me off." Keith and Anita's son, Marlon, adds a brutal childhood memory of Scott, and remembers as a 9-year-old sneaking a peek of the "brain matter all over the walls" in the hours after the fatal shooting. "He kept telling me -- a really nasty kid -- he kept saying he was going to shoot Keith, and that upset me, so I was kind of relieved when he shot himself," Marlon is quoted as saying. "I don't think he intended to shoot himself, really, just an idiot of seventeen who was stoned, angry, playing with a pistol." Let's just remember that we're talking about a minor, a local teenager who Keith and Anita brought into their home and allowed to become wrapped up in their bleak, addiction-laden web. I have no idea what the relationship was, but given what is documented in "Life," it's hard to imagine this kid being nearly as dangerous as the many bottom-feeders and vampires the Richards household regularly seemed to attract. Just how bad an element could this suburban teen have been within the tawdry Richards bunker? Pretty bad, according to the Richards men. A "prick." An "idiot." Gave a 9-year-old "relief" by killing himself. Right after the death, People magazine covered the story and interviewed Cantrell's family. "Anita did not bother to call the Cantrells the night of Scott's death, though [Scott's brother] Jim lives only minutes away, and his brother was alive for almost two hours after the shooting. Nor has Anita tried since to explain what happened. ... "The Cantrells can muster little sympathy for Anita's problems. They are convinced that if Scott hadn't met her he would be alive today. 'People fail to understand that this was a 37-year-old woman and a 17-year-old child,' says Jim." People also quoted from a then new book written by Keith's former aide Tony Sanchez. "Corruption of innocents became one of Keith and Anita's favorite pastimes," he writes. Whatever happened, a teenager still shot himself in the head, leaving behind friends and loved ones. The attitude of Keith and Marlon Richards in "Life" seems brutally callous -- kicking the dead in the teeth. Had I not met Scott myself, I probably would not have reacted as strongly to the passage. But I did, and without knowing about the darkness surrounding that house back then, my friends and I were thrilled to have a Rolling Stone in the neighborhood. In this excerpt from my recent book, "Hello, It's Me: Dispatches From a Pop Culture Junkie," I write about that day we met Scott. To us, he just seemed like an easygoing guy who had struck gold -- a live-in opportunity with a Stone. But be careful what you wish for. "Keith Richards" (Excerpt from "Hello, It's Me") A kid in my high school sat a few of us down in the cafeteria with some highly top-secret news. A friend of his mother, a realtor, had just leased a house in nearby South Salem to none other than Keith Richards. For the next two years, we'd stake out the house on an almost weekly basis. The house sat right near the road and we 17-year-old Stones freaks had it under surveillance constantly. When People magazine featured Mick and Keith on the cover, inside was a picture of Keith and his son Marlon on a tire swing that was right by the driveway. We snuck up and looked inside a greenhouse window that had been turned into a photo developing room -- incredibly, there were pictures of Jagger there on the front lawn of the house. We'd dream up excuses to go to the door -- for instance, the day after the band's 1978 SNL appearance we thought he might be there, so we went hawking my little sister's candy bars for school. A nanny answered, called Marlon over to order a dozen or so bars and paid (inside, a huge portrait of Keith hung over a fireplace). "Keith home?" I meekly asked. "Sorry," she smiled sweetly. "He's in the city." Cars with tinted windows came and went as we spent nights in our cars outside the house. We crept onto his lawn one night and swiped an axe -- not a guitar-but a real hatchet. But he was too elusive for us. By 1979, we were graduating high school, moving on -- but we made one last stand at the Keith house that summer to see if he was there. The ruse that day was that our car was out of water and overheating. A buddy and I knocked on the door, and a young guy -- maybe a year older than us -- wearing a frock and holding a sheep-herding staff came around the house. He kindly gave us water, knowing (I think) what we were up to. "Keith's not here, guys," he said. "He's in Europe." Foiled again. Not long after this odd meeting, in July, something terrible happened at the house. As papers around the world reported, a 17-year-old boy named Scott Cantrell shot himself in the head in actress Anita Pallenberg's bed with a gun owned by Keith Richards. According to reports, Cantrell had been employed as a part-time groundskeeper at the estate and was rumored to be involved with Pallenberg in an intimate relationship. At the time of the shooting, Richards was in Paris recording with the Rolling Stones, but his son with Pallenberg, Marlon, was actually in the home when the tragedy occurred. Pallenberg was arrested, but Cantrell's death was ruled as a suicide in 1980, despite ongoing rumors that Pallenberg and Cantrell had been playing a game of Russian roulette with the gun. Fortunately for Pallenberg, the police investigation confirmed that she was not in the room or on the same floor of the home when the fatal shot was fired. The kid who gave us water that day was Scott Cantrell, an oft-forgotten Stones casualty who got too close to the fire. AOL News |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 7:03pm
Yep. That villainous, calculating seventeen year old really had it coming, didn't he? That is sad. I find it even sadder that Marlon views it in the same way as Keith.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Dec 5th, 2010 at 7:33pm
I just finished reading KEEF's book. It's good, and I enjoyed it for the most part, but I was offended every time he said something bad about MICK. It's just because I always loved MICK more and always will. KEEF should have had more respect for MICK when writing the book. KEEF is a selfish deliberate prick IMO. No matter, I still admire KEEF anyway. Everyone is entitled to write their life story. I dont like KEEF very much now. He may be great at guitar playing, but he sucks as a person. IMO.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Honky Tonk Man on Dec 6th, 2010 at 4:38am
I can't finish it :(
I'm sorry Keith, aside from the pages about your childhood in Dartford, I don't think your book is very good. :( |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Dec 6th, 2010 at 8:18pm
Marlon is thankful that the kid who was saying he would shoot his father shot himself instead, right?
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gemmie on Dec 6th, 2010 at 9:17pm
This is just wrong in so many ways....
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Dec 6th, 2010 at 9:45pm Steel Wheels wrote on Dec 6th, 2010 at 8:18pm:
Just for a point of information. The author of the AOL article is also a regular on IORR by the name of hbwriter who vehemently stands by his article. http://www.iorr.org/talk/read.php?1,1347715,page=8 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Dec 7th, 2010 at 12:25pm Louis Vuitton Fetes Keith Richards' Autobiography Posted Monday December 6, 2010 Keith Richards wasn’t taking much responsibility for his personal celebrity Friday night. “Things just…happen,” he said with a grin. “I never wanted to be a ‘somebody,’ I just wanted to be a good musician. And those two things go together…you realize that you have to be famous to be able to make good music. Double trick.” He gestured with a loose hand at his surroundings — a private, 40-seat dinner Louis Vuitton was hosting at the Gramercy Park Hotel’s Rose Bar in honor of his recently published autobiography, “Life.” The family Richards struck a surprisingly cuddly pose, considering their rock ’n’ roll cred. Richards’ wife, Patti Hansen, repeatedly pet their daughters, Theodora and Alexandra, and referred to them often as her “babies.” Richards —- bandana, eyeliner and skull-scarf in place — switched tables halfway through the meal in order to sit with the missus. And what of the text at hand? “I haven’t finished ‘Life’ yet,” Hansen admitted. “After 30 years of marriage, you kind of figure you know the story. I’ve got it on my Kindle. It’s a little tough. There’s some things…like him having sex with [former love interest] Anita [Pallenberg] and then smelling the orange? Man, it breaks your heart a little. You don’t want to read that. Because that’s deep!” New York luminaries and Vuitton executives were among those who joined the family for the three-course dinner. Fran Lebowitz posted herself at the bar to receive visitors, and Alec Baldwin, Jimmy Fallon, Charlie Rose, John McEnroe and Patty Smyth all sidled up to chat. A midnight toast for the man of the night found Richards seated next to McEnroe. Both men sported a style of wire-rim spectacles generally favored by the senior set, as they intently peered at a video on the tennis legend’s iPhone. The duo might have been mistaken for any old pair of sixtysomethings were it not for Richards’ enduring patina of cool. He laughed when asked on casting preferences should “Life” become a movie. “I’d leave it to somebody else to look around for someone like me,” Richards said. “I mean, good luck!” Alexandra and Keith Richards Fran Lebowitz and Patti Hansen Theodora Richards Photos By Steve Eichner WWD |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Dec 7th, 2010 at 12:57pm
Those picture of the Richards family are fantastic! Thank you!
I don't know about Marlon's comments....you mouth off at me about wanting to shoot my girlfriend, and then you shoot yourself instead....I would say the same thing. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Dec 9th, 2010 at 10:08am More pictures from the Louis Vuitton dinner: Patti and Alexandra Theodora Photos by Mimi Ritzen Crawford vogue.com |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Dec 9th, 2010 at 10:47am
Life was released in Spanish in Spain under the title "Vida" some days ago and now it's available everywhere
This is lovely Estela from Buenos Aires, our partner in crime and webmistress of our message board in Spanish happy with her new baby For more information go to Rocks Off in the language of love and beauty located somewhere over here http://rocksoff.org/foro La vida Loca del buen Keef!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on Dec 9th, 2010 at 10:47am
BTW great intimate pictures there Lefty! Thanks a LOT as always, you rock
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Dec 9th, 2010 at 11:26am
Mick takes a shot at Keith??:
Jagger fires back at Richards By WENN.COM Mick Jagger (WENN.COM file photo) Mick Jagger has launched a thinly-veiled attack on his Rolling Stones bandmate Keith Richards for releasing a tell-all book, insisting stars only publish "tedious" autobiographies "for money". The guitarist released his memoirs, Life, back in October and the book made a number of unflattering references to Jagger, likening him to an annoying mynah bird and suggesting he has a small penis. Jagger now appears to have taken a swipe at Richards for publishing the tome by criticizing celebrities who lift the lid on their personal lives in print. He tells the New York Times' T Magazine, "Personally. I think it's really quite tedious raking over the past. Mostly, people only do it for the money." And the star is adamant he doesn't want to write his own life story: "You don't want to end up like some old footballer in a pub, talking about how he made the cross in the cup final in 1964." |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gemmie on Dec 9th, 2010 at 1:36pm
Keith has some beautiful women in his life. They are all stunning.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by polytoxic on Dec 9th, 2010 at 4:06pm Gemmie wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 1:36pm:
Indeed. And Keith looks cool as fuck --that should be his next stage outfit. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Dec 9th, 2010 at 9:37pm polytoxic wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 4:06pm:
I don't care what his next stage outfit is. AS long as it includes a guitar around his neck. :willya |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Dec 10th, 2010 at 8:10am sweetcharmedlife wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 9:37pm:
and his hands on the frets.......no posturing |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Dec 10th, 2010 at 8:02pm
Nice pics Lefty. No signs of liquor on the table, so I wonder if it's true that KEEF really is on the wagon! I read its been 4 months, not sure if thats accurate. Last year when I saw him at Bernards gig KEEF was drinking that orange nuclear waste and Patti was drinking hot coffee or tea.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Dec 17th, 2010 at 7:30am
Ronnie Spector - Spector's Rage Over Richards Book
17 December 2010 12:07 Ronnie Spector Caption: Ronnie Spector (Picture) outside The Ed Sullivan Theater for 'The Late Show with David Letterman' New York City, USA .... Spector's Rage Over Richards Book Sixties singer RONNIE SPECTOR was furious when she read KEITH RICHARDS' tell-all book - because she mistakenly thought his tales of druggy excesses with RONNIE WOOD referred to her. The Ronettes star was close friends with the Rolling Stones wildman in the band's heyday, but is adamant she "never, ever" took narcotics when partying with him. And she was "angry" when she leafed through his recent memoirs Life and saw his anecdotes about drug-taking with "Ronnie" - until she realised he was referring to his bandmate Wood. Spector tells Vanity Fair, "It was never like that with Keith and me. It was always very innocent. It wasn't all about 'let's get in the bed' with him. I never had sex with him or anything like that... We may have kissed, I don't remember. It was 40 years ago. "I was skimming through it the other day, and he's talking about Ronnie, and I think, 'Oh, he must mean me. I'll read this.' And then he writes, 'We went in the bathroom and did drugs.' I was like, 'Keith! I never did drugs! What are you saying?' "I was so angry with him. I never, ever did drugs with him. In fact, I used to yell at Keith. I'd say, 'You can do a little marijuana but don't go any further than that.' So I'm reading this and I'm just fuming. I'm ready to call him and really cuss him out, but then I read a little more and it turns out he was actually talking about Ronnie Wood." http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/spectors-rage-over-richards-book_1190318 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Dec 18th, 2010 at 3:52pm
Duh! Ronnie S was mentioned in the book and KEEF spoke highly of her.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by moy on Dec 31st, 2010 at 8:55am
Posted at 12:08 PM ET, 12/30/2010
Patti Smith and Keith Richards: a study in contrast By Mark Jenkins Keith Richards's autobiography, "Life,'' doesn't allot much space to payback. But it does fling a few daggers, mostly at people who have personally affronted the quick-tempered guitarist. Of the various people Richards derides in the book, there's only one he seems never to have met: Johnny Rotten. Rotten and the Sex Pistols were a threat - short-lived, as it turned out - to the Rolling Stones' rep as Britain's baddest boys. Raised by socialists and agnostics in a working-class London suburb, Richards by 18 was a rhythm-and-blues purist who considered himself "anti-showbiz'' and his new band "the anti-Beatles.'' Naturally he would have resented the uprising of 1977, the year the Clash proclaimed, "no Elvis, Beatles or the Rolling Stones!'' Across the ocean and a little earlier, a young woman was having similarly mutinous doubts about the Stones and their peers. "We feared that the music which had given us sustenance was in danger of spiritual starvation,'' writes Patti Smith in her memoir, "Just Kids.'' The punk-rock bard who began her hipster makeover by giving herself a Keith Richards haircut decided that '70s rock was "floundering in the mire of spectacle, finance and vapid technical complexity.'' That might sound like a lean new generation's indictment of its potbellied predecessor, and some punk rockers, especially in Britain, did make a point of their raw youth. But read "Life'' and "Just Kids'' together, and the striking thing is how much they overlap. Richards was born on Dec. 18, 1943; Smith followed three years later, on Dec. 30, 1946. Both are the children of factory workers and grew up with little money and big aspirations. Each loved art, literature and classical music as well as rock-and-roll, and had cultured elders. Richards's grandfather, a jazz-band veteran, encouraged the boy to play guitar; Smith's father read Plato out loud at the dinner table. Richards's book covers a much longer period - from his birth all the way to 2007 - while Smith's concentrates on the eight years when she was closest to friend, lover and artistic co-conspirator Robert Mapplethorpe. But the two accounts often dovetail, and some of the same supporting characters appear in both sagas. One explanation for the parallels is that punk rock was not, or at least did not begin as, a generational movement. The early punks were very nearly contemporaries of the rockers they accused of spiritual starvation. The '60s rock generation, Smith writes, "was just a beat before mine.'' Yet the Rolling Stones released their first album in 1964, while the Patti Smith Group's debut didn't arrive for another 11 years - more than just a beat. The gap reflects, in part, the one between Richards's single-mindedness and Smith's dabbling: He was utterly possessed by music, while she pursued art, poetry and (briefly) acting before making the fateful decision to enlist Lenny Kaye to accompany her on electric guitar at her first poetry reading. But there are two other significant factors: Smith was American and, well, a girl. Ruthless with time-wasters and no-hopers, the 1960s British educational system dumped working-class kids into the job market in their mid-teens. Richards was expelled from vocational school in his home town of Dartford, outside London, but managed to slide to nearby Sidcup Art College. The curriculum was commercial art, preparation for a career in advertising. As at many British art schools then, however, the real course of study was American blues, jazz and rock. Richards had learned a lot of Chuck Berry, Muddy Waters and Jimmy Reed by 1962, when he first met pianist Ian Stewart, one of several candidates for "leader'' of the Rolling Stones. Art school was out forever. Around the same time, Smith won an art competition at the Sherwin-Williams paint store near her southern New Jersey home. She began collecting cheap used folios of the great painters and planning her career as an artist. But her father feared that his gangly, tomboy daughter "was not attractive enough to find a husband.'' So she enrolled at Glassboro State College to work toward a teaching degree and a profession that would guarantee "security.'' What liberated Smith, oddly, was an unwanted pregnancy. And here's one of the places where her life significantly diverges from Richards's. Dismissed from Glassboro, the 19-year-old Smith agreed to a private adoption of her first-born, then moved to Brooklyn with vague notions of studying at the Pratt Institute. Instead, she met Mapplethorpe, and became his supporter and protector. Her role could be described as maternal, especially after Mapplethorpe came out - to himself as much as anyone - as gay. So it was hardly out of character when Smith, in 1980, began a long sabbatical from rock music to be a full-time wife (to former MC5 guitarist Fred "Sonic'' Smith) and mother. Her synthesis of the Ronettes and Arthur Rimbaud, Jim Morrison and Antonin Artaud could wait until son Jackson and daughter Jesse grew up. This was not Richards's approach. While taunting both death and the cops, the guitarist sired five children - three with model-actress Anita Pallenberg (one died as an infant) and two with model Patti Hansen. There are pictures of the four surviving kids in "Life,'' and they seem to be doing fine. But it's hard to read the book and not fear for the older two, Marlon and Angela. Their father was a junkie when they were born, and for years after that. So, by the way, was their mother. Incredibly, Marlon became his father's "road buddy'' at 7. The boy navigated as Richards drove to gigs on the Stones' 1976 European tour, and was designated to awaken his father when he nodded off before a show. That's because Richards kept a "shooter'' under his pillow, and the road crew decided that Marlon was the member of the entourage least likely to get plugged for awakening the zoned-out guitarist. "He was a great minder,'' Richards writes of Marlon, with no apparent irony. Angela soon became the responsibility of Richards's mother, still living in Dartford. Marlon later joined a Long Island rock-and-roll household headed by the guitarist's father. (Richards's parents had split as soon as their only child left home.) Eventually, Marlon sent himself to school in Britain. Despite his routine references to "bitches'' and "old ladies,'' Richards doesn't seem to be a woman-hater. He insists he's not a soulless seducer like longtime bandmates Jagger and Bill Wyman, or a batterer like the late Brian Jones, another "leader'' of the Stones. He claims to prefer cuddling to sex and to "have never put the make on a girl in my life.'' His affection for early love Veronica Bennett - later Ronnie Spector - seems genuine, and he's been married to Hansen for 27 years. But many of the people on "Life's" enemies' list are there because of the brief period in 1968 when Pallenberg slipped from Jones to Richards to Jagger and then back to Richards. If the guitarist underestimates Jones's contribution to the Stones, it's at least in part because Jones abused Pallenberg. (Actually, most of Richards's stories about this mistreatment involve Jones's failed attempts to hit his then-girlfriend, often injuring himself in the process.) Among the many injuries sustained during Richards and Jagger's long working relationship, one that still festers is the singer's alleged fling with Pallenberg on the set of "Performance.'' Richards continues to seethe at Donald Cammell, the movie's co-director, calling him "a twister and a manipulator'' for casting Jagger and Pallenberg as lovers in the film. The guitarist is clearly pleased that the director (who also has a cameo in "Just Kids'') ultimately "topped himself.'' Although Richards says he "never put the make on a girl,'' he responded to Jagger and Pallenberg's supposed dalliance by bedding Marianne Faithfull, Jagger's girlfriend at the time. He crows about it in one of "Life's'' most discussed passages, where he calls Jagger (or some part of him) a "tiny todger.'' But the betrayal didn't really bother him, Richards protests, and besides, his distress inspired him to write "Gimme Shelter.'' "Just Kids'' has a gentler tone, but it's not free of jealousy. When Mapplethorpe first started having sex with men, he kept his exploits secret from Smith, who was shocked and hurt to learn of them. (Although a devotee of Genet and Rimbaud, she was initially unprepared to learn that her real live boyfriend had this desire in common with her poetic crushes.) Later, Mapplethorpe regarded Smith's lovers with suspicion. That's not unreasonable, since she had a string of affairs with men who made no commitments. "Just Kids'' and the first part of "Life'' each recount their authors' apprenticeships, but much of Richards's education was pursued from a position of strength: He was male and a rock star. He may not have been a great guitarist when he first started encountering such musical heroes as Waters, Don Everly and Elvis Presley sideman Scotty Moore, but he was somehow on their level. An ingenue who lucked into a spot in the Chelsea Hotel scene, Smith lacked that status. She was fed and supported, educated and encouraged by such lovers as poet Jim Carroll (who turned tricks on the side), playwright Sam Shepard (who was married at the time) and Blue Oyster Cult keyboardist Allen Lanier (who lived the promiscuous rock-star life on the road). But she wasn't their peer. As a woman in the late 1960s and early '70s, Smith was limited by other people's expectations, but also by her own sense of possibilities and responsibilities. She wanted to be an artist and a poet, but her exemplars for those vocations were mostly male. Often she looked to famous wives and lovers as role models. She prayed for "the mistress of Jules Laforgue,'' identified with the "mutinous spirit'' of Zelda Fitzgerald and constructed a poem "from the perspective of Jesse James's girlfriend.'' She writes that "the girls interested me: Marianne Faithfull, Anita Pallenberg, Amelia Earhart, Mary Magdalene.'' That might seem an odd list, but it's characteristic of Smith, who prized equally glamour, bravery and suffering. As a child, she was intensely religious and often ill, and found herself "privileged with a new level of awareness'' when she suffered such routine ailments as measles and chicken pox. Then she met Mapplethorpe, a lapsed Catholic whose work used poetic images of martyrdom. Anguish and death were among the things that united them. "Life'' and "Just Kids'' are both books of the dead. Smith's memoir is explicitly a tribute to Mapplethorpe, who succumbed to AIDS in 1989. It also pays tribute to other casualties of the era, only some of whom Smith actually knew. One of her most cherished ghosts is Brian Jones, the pretty-boy martyr of the Rolling Stones. Hearing of his death in 1969, Smith "laid my drawing pencils aside and began a cycle of poems to Brian Jones, for the first time expressing my love of rock-and-roll within my own work.'' Richards's reaction to Jones's demise was less flowery. He calls him a "whining son of a bitch.'' While he doesn't mourn Jones, Richards does pay tribute to Ian Stewart, another lost Stone. And to his infant son, Tara, and his parents. (Did the guitarist actually snort his father's ashes? Well, kinda.) One loss that hit Richards hard was that of Gram Parsons, a close friend and crucial influence on the Stones' forays into country music. It doesn't make much sense in retrospect, but at the time of Parsons' s death in 1973, Richards was convinced that he had to pay tribute to his departed comrade by driving from Innsbruck, Austria, to Munich to see a German model he barely knew. (His explanation to her: "I don't know why, a friend of mine's just died, and I'm pretty [screwed] up. I just want to say hello.'') Irreverent and unchurched but respectful of loss, both Richards and Smith sought fresh rituals to mark life's great changes. It's fitting that this quest recalls the cultural improvisations of the Beats. If '70s punk was just a twist on '60s rock, many of hippiedom's enthusiasms were handed down from the likes of Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg. They too loved "Negro'' music, and chanted mash-ups of Christian, Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu incantations. In the early 1960s, Richards struck bluesman poses at posh parties in suburban London, and enjoyed appearing exotic and dangerous. "I love to be treated as black,'' he writes. Once the guitarist had time and money to travel, he was drawn to places populated by wise primitives with mind-altering rituals. In 1967, in the wake of Richards and Jagger's first big drug bust, they headed to Morocco, the Beats' hashish-perfumed 1950s playground. Later, Richards was proud to be accepted in Jamaica's Steer Town, a ganja-fogged Rastafarian enclave where few white people tread. The Beats were still around, of course, to score walk-ons in "Life'' and "Just Kids.'' William S. Burroughs counseled both Richards and Smith, at different times, and Ginsberg tried to pick up Smith at a Horn & Hardart automat, thinking she was a he. Even when the Beats are not there, they sort of are. Richards's globe-trotting "outlaw'' phase reads like "On the Road'' with an unlimited expense account. All that money bought Richards "pure pharmaceutical'' heroin and cocaine, which kept him, he writes, from being a "pop star.'' It also paid the attorneys who saved him from ever doing a long stretch in prison. But the cash helped tame him. After the guitarist kicked junk in 1978, he was left with pop - okay, rock - stardom and even a sort of respectability. For decades, his home base has been that casbah of the Northeast Corridor, Westport, Conn. Richards didn't go so far as to be knighted, and says he counseled Sir Mick to decline that honor. Yet he likes his private library, his country homes and a good cup of tea. (No wonder he usually refers to himself as "English,'' although when feeling ornery he's a "Celt,'' or even "Welsh.'') "Life'' has some OMG moments, but its outlook often seems old-fashioned. As his references to "bitches'' and "poofters'' reveal, Richards hasn't updated his mid-'60s attitudes. He's a reprobate with a strong sense of heterosexual-male privilege. In the 1970s, the bitches and the poofters claimed bigger and better roles for themselves, a history "Just Kids'' tells in miniature. But it was an evolution, not an insurrection. Punk turned out to be a reform movement, and one thing it mellowed was the fetish for self-destruction. Some punks flamed out, but others practiced moderation or "straight edge,'' cool in their uncoolness. At least one got married and quietly raised her kids. The life goes out of "Life'' after the 1970s, and the three decades since claim only about 100 of its 564 pages. The beat goes on, but the adventure is over. Much like the music he plays, Richards grows up to become familiar, assimilated and manageable. If Smith knows she's no longer a kid, Richards is still nurturing his adolescent defiance. "I'm not in show business,'' he asserts toward the end of his autobiography. But that's beyond his control. The Biz proved capable of expanding to include junkie-pirate-bluesman as just another specialty act. By Mark Jenkins | December 30, 2010; 12:08 PM ET |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Jan 5th, 2011 at 6:56am
Arise, Sir Keef?
Andrew Vaughan | 12.30.2010 Interviewed recently by BBC Radio 2, Keith Richards said he owns around 300 guitars but he’s not really a guitar player. “The storage costs me more than they’re worth,” he said. “I don’t even consider myself a guitar player. I am not a Hendrix or Clapton.” London Mayor Boris Johnson might disagree with Mr. Richards, since he’s been campaigning for the Stones guitarist to be knighted. He told the Daily Telegraph: “It is a continuing scandal that Keef Richards has not been made, at the very least, a knight bachelor, and the outrage became clear to me this Christmas when – like so many other men of my generation – I was sentenced to Life. That is, I was given a copy of Keef’s super-selling autobiography of that name; and by the end of my researches I felt the full weight of the injustice. “This is the man whose inexhaustible work ethic produced virtually every landmark Stones riff, from ‘Satisfaction’ to ‘Honky Tonk Woman’ to ‘Start Me Up,’ and whose lasting historical contribution was to reintroduce Americans to their own blues music. Rock ’n’ roll was the most extraordinary art form of the second half of the 20th century, and Keef is one of its most brilliant exponents, and one of this country’s most successful exports. He is not just a credit to Sidcup Art School; he is an inspiration to every London child who peeps a recorder or strums a guitar. Arise Sir Keef, I say, and if there were any damn merit in it, he would have the Order of Merit, too.” http://www.gibson.com/en-us/Lifestyle/News/keith-richards-1230-2010/ [img][/img] |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Jan 5th, 2011 at 6:35pm
Somebody (I don't think it's keith) has got a Youtube Channel.
http://www.youtube.com/user/officialkeef#g/c/5C4E9116A8E67E4B |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by luxury on Jan 6th, 2011 at 9:43am
Never a fan of Patti Smith's "music", I recently enjoyed her book Just Kids much more so than Keith's Life. With a wonderfully warm insightful writing style, she satiated some of my curiosity about that hot mess of Mapplethorpe.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Jan 6th, 2011 at 10:41am Heart Of Stone wrote on Jan 5th, 2011 at 6:56am:
Inexhaustible work ethic?????????.......laff of the year so far! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jan 6th, 2011 at 11:03am gimmekeef wrote on Jan 6th, 2011 at 10:41am:
Nobody worked harder to get high than Keith. :interestingstuffronnie |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by corgi37 on Jan 14th, 2011 at 4:35am
I'm up to the 72 tour. I like the style of the writing. It's like keith is sitting in a chair with a Marlboro & a Toxic Waste & telling ya all his tales. Very casual.
But i must say, there are a lot of blanks. I keep harking back to Spanish Tony's book, which i think fills in a lot. There's a few mistakes too. For example, Mick, Keith & Charlie went to tell Brian he was out, not just Mick & Keith. I was a little miffed there was no talk of songs like LSTNT, RT, Dandelion or We love you. No mention of Ed Sullivan. No mention of Bill scoring his own song on a album. No talk of THE WHO supporting the band by releasing some Stones songs as rushed singles. I thought the 69 tour required more. Keith seems to not recognize any other band apart from the Stones. And, nothing on Hendrix! I guess he really was in his own world from 67 onwards. I would enjoy hearing about his thoughts on music trends and the artists of the day. All in all, i think if you combine parts of Cutler's book, Sanchez's book, and this one, you get the real full story. And if any of you have that fabulous book by Dalton "The first 20 years", there is a stunning review of a Stones concert written by Patti Smith, who was clearly, clearly smitten with the band. And Keith in particular. So for her to be linked to people who hated the Stones, its prettty interesting reading. She came!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Jan 22nd, 2011 at 5:07pm
A very generous poster on this board, knowing I had yet to get my own copy, kindly sent me an extra copy that was on hand.
A very sincere thank you! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Jan 23rd, 2011 at 8:46am Gemmie wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 1:36pm:
His last two daughters are indeed very beautiful, and seem quite sane. Its funny that the Beatles were seen as the good guys, yet some of their offspring are pretty troubled, yet most of the Stones kids have turned out quite normal. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by corgi37 on Jan 24th, 2011 at 4:06am
Just finished LIFE & was pretty underwhelmed. I really expected more. It was more than ok, but this is Keith we are talking about. A few good stories here and there & so much totally left out or forgotten or deemed unimportant.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jan 26th, 2011 at 4:03pm
from Keithrichards.com
Keith's critically acclaimed autobiography, Life, has made the shortlist for the 2010 Duff Cooper Prize. Recognizing the best in non-fiction writing, the Duff Cooper Prize has been awarded annually since 1956. The winner of this year's prize will be announced on February 22. Good luck Keith! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Jan 26th, 2011 at 5:33pm
Keith is suppose to be in the film trailer for the new Pirates movie, but darn if I can see him in it.
http://www.keithrichards.com/news/ http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809791042/info |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gimme Shelter on Jan 27th, 2011 at 2:39am
Keith is the one who says "Don't be a fool Jackie. The fountain will test you."
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Jan 27th, 2011 at 7:42am Gimme Shelter wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 2:39am:
Thanks, saw it near the beginning. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:38am Elton doesn't want to read Keith's too-candid memoirs February 03, 2011 Talk of pal Mick Jagger's alleged small penis and his miserable nature has put Elton John off reading Keith Richards' memoirs Life. The Rocket Man was looking forward to reading the 2010 book, but early details of the rocker's revelations put him off. He insists he'd never be so candid about his longtime songwriting partner, Bernie Taupin. He says, "I was a bit put off by hearing the bit about Mick's penis. I'm a big Mick fan. If I said that Bernie Taupin was a miserable c**t and had a small penis, he'd probably never talk to me again. "It's like, 'Why do that?' especially with someone you're in a working relationship with." And Elton fears the book will bring back too many bad memories for him. He tells Rolling Stone magazine, "It just sounds like it will take me back to the drug things." The rocker spent much of his early career battling drug addiction problems. Yahoo! News Elton might still be smarting about Keith's "dead blondes" snark from a few years ago... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Feb 4th, 2011 at 9:23am
The press acts like the book is nothing more than a Mick's wick review. :forfucksake
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Feb 4th, 2011 at 1:15pm
Elton busy reading Ladies Home Journal?.....
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Feb 4th, 2011 at 1:42pm gimmekeef wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 1:15pm:
diapering tips |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:31pm
I like two Elton John songs and totally despise him as a person.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Feb 4th, 2011 at 9:30pm Steel Wheels wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:31pm:
I love many Elton John songs and could care less about his personal life. At this point,he comes across as a much more likeable human being than Keith does honestly. :wtf2 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Feb 5th, 2011 at 9:15am
I'm sure I'd have more fun if Keef took me to lunch than Elton.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by paul on Feb 7th, 2011 at 4:00pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Feb 7th, 2011 at 4:52pm paul wrote on Feb 7th, 2011 at 4:00pm:
Great Interview is right, the only thing is Keith didn't found The Stones, as we know it's Ian Stewart & Brian Jones. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Mar 20th, 2011 at 7:12pm From keithrichards.com: A late review of Life has just come in from the New York Review of Books, and it's another rave. Writer Dan Chiasson calls the book the "unlikely heir to two great memoirs of thrift and common sense, Walden and Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography" and ultimately labels it "a splendid autobiography". The full review is available to read online here. Late - and long - but an excellent piece by Chiasson. A highly recommended read. Loved the Annie Liebovitz shot from '75, too: |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Mar 22nd, 2011 at 12:09am
Whew doggie...that was a LONG one. I wonder if Keith would have made it all the way through. The reviewer included Keith in some pretty lofty company. I read this yesterday - one part that sticks with me is the reviewer's statement that the Stones didn't do flower power well. That was true to a certain degree - they didn't give off as peaceful a vibe as the Beatles, CSN&Y or the Byrds, but they certainly provided some seriously good background music for the chaos of the sixties.
Well worth the 3 pages! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Apr 7th, 2011 at 7:11am What Keith Richards -- yes, Keith Richards -- taught me about sports Steve Rushin Wednesday April 6, 2011 Keith Richards and The Rolling Stones headlined the halftime show of Super Bowl XL in 2006. Getty I once played golf with Jesse Ventura, who brandished a telescopic ball retriever throughout our round and probed the many ponds for other people's Titleists. "I'm lookin' for Pro V1s," explained The Body, who was the sitting governor of Minnesota at the time. "Those puppies are five dollars a ball." His frugality was born of economic necessity. In his wrestling days, Ventura said, when incapacitated by injury, he made ends meet as a stage security guard for concerts at the Met Center, where the Minnesota North Stars played hockey. When the Rolling Stones played the Met in 1978 and '81, Ventura worked their shows. Two decades later, the Stones again played the Twin Cities, and this time Ventura met them -- as governor -- and told Keith Richards that he used to serve as muscle on their stage. "Let me get this straight," said Keef, who I like to imagine was in a silk kimono, and clutching a lowball glass of Jack Daniels. "You body-guarded us in '81, and now you're the Guv'nor?" Keef thought about this for a moment, then said with a twinkle: "F-----' great country, mate." Because of this story, and where I heard it, and from whom, I have associated Richards ever since not with snorting his own father's ashes, or falling out of a tree in Fiji, or writing "Gimme Shelter." No, when I think of Keef I think of golf and hockey and professional wrestling. True, the piratical guitarist was no athlete -- his mother Doris said young Keith ran away from the the real football ball whenever it was passed to him -- nor much of a fan. But while tearing through Life, his 564-page autobiography, I was struck by how much Richards resembled a professional athlete. And how much he had to say, without knowing it, about athletic genius. It's not just the performance-enhancing drugs, though the peak years of Richards' career, like those of so many superstar athletes, were a dizzying pharmacopoeia of ingestions and injections and legal injunctions. No, there was also the freakish sports injury that he succeeded in spite of (at first) and because of (later). As a kid playing street the real football in the London suburb of Dartford, Keith moved a flagstone paver out of the way and dropped it on his right index finger, smashing it. "It really flattened out the finger for pick work," Keith writes. "It could have something to do with the sound. I've got this extra grip." I thought of Larry Bird's right index finger. It was broken by a softball line drive off the bat of his brother Mike and forever bent at a 45-degree angle, which should have -- but somehow didn't -- adversely affect his shooting. On the contrary, Bird and Richards became virtuosos, their mangled fingers "having something to do with the sound." There are early scenes in Life that appear in almost every athlete's autobiography, in which fear and failure on the playground prove foundational. In Keith's case, he was a year younger than his classmates, often bullied and called "Monkey" for his big ears. I thought of Michael Phelps, also bullied as a child for his ears. Keith hated rugby and was called a pansy. "The playground's the big judge," he writes. "That's where all the decisions are really made. It's called play, but it's nearer to a battlefield, and it can be brutal, the pressure." Keith went to art school and started the Rolling Stones. Michael Phelps went to the pool and won 16 Olympic medals. Phelps found satisfaction. Keith wrote "Satisfaction." When he was at Inter Milan, I asked another genius, Ronaldo, to describe being in the proverbial zone, a precinct few of us will ever visit. "There are no words," he said. But Keef -- as befits a man who wrote "Jumpin' Jack Flash" about his gardener, Jack -- is seldom short of a felicitous phrase. "Levitation is probably the closest analogy to what I feel -- whether it's 'Jumpin' Jack' or 'Satisfaction' or 'All Down the Line' -- when I realize I've hit the right tempo and the band's behind me. It's like taking off in a Learjet. I have no sense that my feet are touching the ground. I'm elevated to this other space." That's why he doesn't retire. He's not doing it for you, Keef says: He's doing it for Keef. At 67, his face cross-hatched with crevasses, Richards is often asked about retirement. But like countless athletes -- Brett Favre comes immediately to mind, Cal Ripken is another -- he refuses to retire on someone else's timetable, simply to preserve your memories. This is what so many of us fail to grasp about athletes. While we clamor for them to step aside -- so as not to sully our memories -- we fundamentally misunderstand them. They're not doing it for us, nor should they be. In the end, there's some freakish spark, defying explanation, common to Keef and others touched by greatness. Mario Lemieux this winter attributed the brilliance of Sidney Crosby to one fact: "He thinks about hockey 24 hours a day, even in his sleep." Lemieux was in a position to know of Crosby's nocturnal devotion, having had him as a housemate for five years. Keef did Crosby one better. He seldom slept at all. "For many years I slept, on average, twice a week," he claims. "This means I have been conscious for at least three lifetimes." Ah, but when Keith did sleep, he was dreaming about his art. He not only wrote "Satisfaction" in his sleep, but also played it for the first time in his sleep that same night. He woke with no memory of the song, but pressed play on the Phillips tape recorder next to the bed anyway -- just in case. What he heard was the now-indelible guitar riff, followed by 40 minutes of snoring. If that isn't genius, we have yet to discover it. SI.com Interesting take on Keef from a sportswriter's POV. Good read. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Apr 7th, 2011 at 12:32pm
The monkey boy became monkey man. Interesting perspective. I would never have thought to compare Keith with athletes.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 7th, 2011 at 1:00pm Ginda wrote on Apr 7th, 2011 at 12:32pm:
Not that much of a stretch to compare musicians to atheletes. Your only as good as your last record. Your only as good as your last season. They both get paid too much. People hero worship both. Athletes want to be rock stars. Rock stars want to be athletes. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Apr 7th, 2011 at 7:24pm sweetcharmedlife wrote on Apr 7th, 2011 at 1:00pm:
OR..."You're only as good as your last envelope." http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR5EKl89cieXcOn-bxajsybRb3_HwFQTOo9o_dp4H2FCrMaLaMo |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 7th, 2011 at 9:55pm Ginda wrote on Apr 7th, 2011 at 7:24pm:
LOL Ginda. I would think that would apply more to promoters....But good point. :smilebrian |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:10am
I just finished reading "Life" and my 3 word review - what a prick. I will always love and remain grateful for the music, but I can't help but feel sorry for a man of his years with so little empathy and self awareness.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:35am
But remember, Keith has said many times, music first, family second...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:39am steel driving hammer wrote on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:35am:
Have you read the book? It's Keith first. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:41am
No I haven't.
Sounds like Keith is just being honest. But w/ all the comments on the message boards, you could say I have... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:46am steel driving hammer wrote on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:41am:
No, I wouldn't say that. Reading comments ABOUT a book is not the same as reading the book. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:50am
Well then I have some reading to do...
Guess I just don't wanna be shocked or change my feelings twards him when I read it. Meaning, I've been just wanting to listen to the music. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Honky Tonk Man on Apr 18th, 2011 at 1:38pm
I'm with Ginda, here: Life most certainly does not post Keith in the greatest of lights. To be honest, a lot of my respect vanished the instance I heard his comments regarding Brian's death - 'shit happens' - in the documentary, 25x5.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 19th, 2011 at 2:24pm steel driving hammer wrote on Apr 18th, 2011 at 9:50am:
I agree with Ginda in regards to the book and Keith's attitude. But it doesn't change my opinion about the music. I'll always love that. :keithpunky |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Voodoo Chile In Wonderland on May 2nd, 2011 at 6:26am
http://www.examiner.com/business-networking-in-hartford/keith-richard-s-life-is-amongst-the-nominations-for-the-2011-audie-award
Keith Richard's LIFE is amongst the nominations for The 2011 Audies Award May 2nd, 2011 5:42 am ET Maggie DellaRocco - Griffin Hartford Business Networking Examiner The Audio Publishers Association (APA) has announced three Audies finalists to be amongst receiving a highly prestigious Audio book of the year award. One of these Top finalists is Keith Richard’s LIFE, narrated by actor Johnny Depp and fellow legendary artist and musician Joe Hurley. The Audies Awards will take place on May 24th, 2011. With LIFE being top in sales, there is no question that one of the most famous rockers of all time, lead guitarist of The Rolling Stones - Keith Richards, has topped the list from those who purchased and continue to listen to his book. Keith Richard’s LIFE - out on 20 CDs – of whom musician legend and fellow artists Joe Hurley joining Actor Johnny Depp in voicing what the Guardian calls “the vicarious thrill of voyeurism within the framework of a cautionary or salutary tale” In Keith Richard’s LIFE Audio Book. As lead guitarist of the Rolling Stones, Keith Richards created the riffs, the lyrics, and the songs that roused the world. A true and towering original, he has always walked his own path, spoken his mind, and done things his own way. Richards pauses to tell his story in the most anticipated autobiography in decades. It is as though you are sitting in the comfort of Keith Richard’s Living Room listening to the most amazing true stories that is completely fascinating. Listening obsessively to Chuck Berry and Muddy Waters records in a coldwater flat with Mick Jagger and Brian Jones, building a sound and a band out of music they loved. Finding fame and success as a bad-boy band, only to find them challenged by authorities everywhere. Dropping his guitar’s sixth string to create a new sound that allowed him to create immortal riffs like those in “Honky Tonk Woman” and “Jumpin’ Jack Flash.” Falling in love with Anita Pallenberg, Brian Jones’s girlfriend. Arrested and imprisoned for drug possession, tax exile in France and recording Exile on Main Street increasing fame, isolation and addiction - making life an ever faster frenzy. Through it all, Richards remained devoted to the music of the band, until even that was challenged by Mick Jagger’s attempt at a solo career, leading to a decade of conflicts and ultimately the biggest reunion tour in history. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 3rd, 2011 at 7:29am Johnny Depp: 'Keith Richards is fascinating' Tuesday, May 3 2011 By Mike Moody © Rex Features / Startraks Photo Johnny Depp has called Keith Richards a "fascinating man". Depp and Richards shared the screen in the 2007 film Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End. In an interview with Radio Times, Depp said that he treasures the time he spends with the Rolling Stones guitarist. "He's a fascinating man, you know. Read his autobiography Life. It's a great book, and he tells it like it is," Depp said about Richards. The Oscar nominee continued: "I've known him for a long time. To get periods on set where it's just him and me hanging out, sitting around and yakking about music, movies, whatever, was a real pleasure." Depp, who will appear in the film adaptation of 21 Jump Street, also joked that Richards would drink something that "looks like nuclear waste" to unwind. "I'm a wine man and I do like a good glass of red. So I would have my glass of wine and Keith would have his usual. I've no idea what that is, because it looks like nuclear waste and it's a combination only he would know," he added. Richards and Depp will appear together on the next Pirates movie On Stranger Tides, opening May 20, 2011. Digital Spy Keith "tells it like it is" in Life, and JD reads it out loud. Wonder what's up with his Keith documentary... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Sasha Luvs Sully on May 6th, 2011 at 5:18pm
I'm currently reading the book for the second time. This is definitely the sort of book you read a few times so that you can soak it all in. Even if you don't agree with everything Keef wrote, it sure is a hell of a book!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on May 9th, 2011 at 5:14pm
When Keith Richards Wrote '(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction' In His Sleep
Plus: More rock anniversaries from the Stooges, Weezer and more The Rolling Stones performing in New York City, May 2, 1965. Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images 3 Comments By Stacey Anderson May 9, 2011 12:30 PM ET This week in rock history, the Rolling Stones recorded "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction," the Stooges began laying down Fun House, Keith Relf of the Yardbirds and Frank Sinatra passed away, and Weezer released their smash debut album. May 12, 1965: The Rolling Stones record "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" Humanity may be better off not knowing what Keith Richards dreams about, but it sure paid off once: when the Rolling Stones' guitarist conjured the riff to "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" in his sleep. As he's explained in interviews, Richards heard his now-famous three-note run in a dream, woke to plant the riff on his tape recorder and mumble "I can't get no satisfaction," and then fell back asleep soundly. The band was initially worried that the hook was reminiscent of Martha and the Vandellas' "Dancing in the Street" but committed it to tape anyway at RCA Hollywood Studios the following week. Written with singer Mick Jagger and produced by band manager Andrew Loog Oldham, "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" launched the Stones' true British Invasion fame as their first No. 1 single in America in June of 1965. The track was included on the American version of that year's Out of Our Heads. May 10, 1970 - The Stooges begin recording Fun House When the Stooges recorded what would become their bristling second album, Fun House, civility went off the table. In its place: plenty of drugs. “We had a certain purity of intention,” wild frontman Iggy Pop reflects in Rolling Stone’s 500 Greatest Albums of All Time, where the album resides at Number 189. “I don’t think we did ever get it from the drugs. I think they killed things.” But from the sound of the album, released on July 7, 1970 (or 7/7/70), the creative process was still electric, with scabrous proto-punk tracks "Loose," "L.A. Blues," and the winding seven-minute-plus title cut. Fun House proved to be an influential force on punk rock, despite initially tepid sales. It was recorded at Los Angeles’s Elektra Sound Recorders in a 15-day blast and produced by former Kingsmen keyboardist Don Galluci, who proved crucial in capturing the Ann Arbor, Michigan, group’s live ferocity to tape. Fun House featured the iconic Stones lineup of Iggy Pop (vocals), Ron Asheton (guitar), Dave Alexander (bass), and Scott Asheton (drums), with woodwind support from Steve Mackay (saxophone). May 14, 1976: Keith Relf of the Yardbirds dies of electrocution while playing electric guitar Aside from their own hit singles, the Yardbirds helped predict some of the greatest rock music of all time. Their lineup in the Sixties included three of rock's most immortal guitarists before they hit international glory — Eric Clapton, Jeff Beck, and Jimmy Page — and was a steadily influential force in distortion-drenched, blues-rock experimentalism. The group charted with singles "For Your Love," "Heart Full of Soul," and "Over Under Sideways Down" but disbanded in 1968, though an incarnation reformed in 1992 and remains modestly active. Unfortunately, the Yardbirds' lead singer and harmonica player, Keith Relf, never got to realize his own rock stardom as fully as his six-stringers did. He died from electrocution while playing an improperly grounded electric guitar near an exposed gas pipe in his London home recording studio. He was 33, and in the process of regrouping another one of his vaunted rock acts, Renaissance. Relf was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame posthumously in 1992. May 10, 1994: Weezer release The Blue Album Weezer formed in 1992, at the apex of grunge rock, and seemed a perplexing, preppy anomaly by comparison. Mercurial, brilliant frontman Rivers Cuomo, formerly a long-haired metalhead, peered out nervously behind smudged black plastic glasses, singing reedily about Mary Tyler Moore and gang violence ("Buddy Holly"), playing Dungeons and Dragons alone ("In the Garage"), and the fatalist undertow of surfing ("Surf Wax America"). Yet these songs formed the crux of Weezer's hit self-titled debut (commonly referred to as the Blue Album for its cover photo), which shot the young quartet into triple-platinum sales. The Blue Album forms half of the Weezer's beloved origins: together with 1996's esoteric Pinkerton, it has achieved cult status and is defended rabidly by the group's earlier fans (the same followers who often decry the band's current output as shallow and complacent by comparison). It was produced by Cars frontman Ric Ocasek and featured the group's original lineup: Rivers Cuomo (singer/guitarist), Patrick Wilson (drums), Brian Bell (guitarist) and Matt Sharp (bassist; he left the group after Pinkerton and now fronts the Rentals). The Blue Album peaked at Number 16 on the Billboard charts and spawned the hit singles "Undone (The Sweater Song)," "Buddy Holly," and "Say It Ain't So" — as well as innovative, cheeky music videos ("Undone" and "Buddy Holly" with burgeoning director Spike Jonze) and widespread emulation of Cuomo's nebbish, erudite persona. Link has got video's. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/when-keith-richards-wrote-i-cant-get-no-satisfaction-in-his-sleep-20110509 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 10th, 2011 at 1:36pm May 10, 2011 Vote For Life! It's time to vote! Life has been nominated for Spike's 2011 Guy's Choice Awards, in the category of Outstanding Literary Achievement. Winners will be determined by online poll, so head to Spike.com to cast your vote for Life now, and then be sure to tune in to Spike on June 10 to see the results. keithrichards.com This one's got the makings of a real nailbiter. Keith's going up against that noted literary heavyweight, Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on May 10th, 2011 at 2:54pm left shoe shuffle wrote on May 10th, 2011 at 1:36pm:
Mick and I haven't decided who to vote for just yet... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 10th, 2011 at 3:10pm Mike Piazza is the only Todger Snooki's ever heard of... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on May 10th, 2011 at 3:25pm left shoe shuffle wrote on May 10th, 2011 at 3:10pm:
HA! Well, thank you. Mick and I are now ready to vote. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on May 10th, 2011 at 4:45pm left shoe shuffle wrote on May 10th, 2011 at 3:10pm:
The Los Angeles Todgers? :Youmakeagrownmancrylikejoey |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on May 14th, 2011 at 12:02pm
Good interview with Keith in the new issue of 'Word' magazine in the UK
A big thanks to Monkeymark on IORR for uploading it. http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture1.jpg?t=1305385850 http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture2.jpg?t=1305385850 http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture3.jpg?t=1305385850 http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture4.jpg?t=1305385850 http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture5.jpg?t=1305385850 http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture6.jpg?t=1305385850 http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture7.jpg?t=1305385850 http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture8.jpg?t=1305385850 http://i1107.photobucket.com/albums/h400/magicmojo1/Picture9.jpg?t=1305385850 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on May 14th, 2011 at 2:20pm
Great article thanks for posting Gazza.....Keith has such an amazing way of expressing himself...just wish he and Mick could find the spark to write one last great stones song...not an album just one more classic before i'm gone......
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by riffkeither on May 14th, 2011 at 2:34pm
Hey Gazza , thanks for this awesome!
:Youmakeagrownmancrylikejoey |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on May 14th, 2011 at 3:11pm
I was sent a copy of this article earlier this morning [smiley=cool.gif]. One of the best interviews I've read in ages. Mark Ellen struck me as uninfatuated but well informed. He asked some pretty pointed questions then followed them up for clarification instead of giggling and glossing over.
I think Keith may have underestimated the sharpness of his own teeth in relation to someone else's hide. His own has shown itself to be thin at times. I guess time will tell how fast the water under the bridge(s) is flowing. All in all a great interview. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on May 14th, 2011 at 3:24pm
Mark Ellen's a good music journo. He was editor of 'Q' with David Hepworth when it launched in 1986 or so and was there for the first few years when it was the best magazine of its kind on the planet. He left to become the editor of the new 'Mojo' when IT launched in the early 90s, so he has a pretty good pedigree.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on May 14th, 2011 at 5:37pm
Thanks for posting this Gazza, a great interview, I've always loved reading interviews with Keith, his respect for the Beatles lately is touching, even going as far as saying we (Stones) wouldn't have made it without them!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Joey on May 14th, 2011 at 5:50pm
" his respect for the Beatles lately is touching, even going as far as saying we (Stones) wouldn't have made it without them "
!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on May 14th, 2011 at 6:26pm
Interesting interview. Keith has a way of justifying things that most people would never believe. But most people haven't had his Life. I still have to wonder though. If he swears his fingers don't keep him from playing what does? Get up there and play some music man.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Some Guy on May 14th, 2011 at 7:54pm gimmekeef wrote on May 14th, 2011 at 2:20pm:
Plundered My Soul?? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 15th, 2011 at 3:05pm Excellent interview. Thanks for the repost. Can't recall Keith discussing his arthritis before. Hopefully that'll silence some of the pundits who claim it's impacted his ability to play anymore. He also copped to the fact that when he and Mick saw each each other "two weeks ago" - hard to say exactly when that might've been, but the interview is post-Theo's March bust - Mick was "a little hurt" about the book. Keith, of course, remained defiantly unrepentant in his retelling of that meeting. I'd really like to think that privately he ditched the bravado and proffered a mea culpa to his brother from another mother... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by luxury on May 16th, 2011 at 12:01pm
...i've been writing bitchy little comments re: Life on Keith's twitter account
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on May 16th, 2011 at 2:09pm luxury wrote on May 16th, 2011 at 12:01pm:
does that mean you're twotting, not tweeting? ;) |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by dadrob on May 16th, 2011 at 4:13pm
thanks for posting that
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on May 16th, 2011 at 7:31pm
One of the things I can relate to in LIFE is that Keith DOESN'T hold all of his collaborators in high regard. There have been creative projects I've been a part, and some of those involved are people I cannot stand. They are highly talented, but I don't like them at all as people.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on May 16th, 2011 at 10:42pm Steel Wheels wrote on May 16th, 2011 at 7:31pm:
Steel Wheels, your last sentence encapsulates my feeling for Keith after reading LIFE. Respect his talent, but don't like the person he has become. His stock dropped like a brick with me. As I said before, I feel sorry for a man of his years with so little empathy and self-awareness. No disrespect intended to you or your admiration for the man. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 25th, 2011 at 7:19am 'Life' wins Top Award at the 2011 Audies http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef01538eb1b639970b-800wi Photo credit: Courtesy of Hachette Audio Deborah Netburn May 25, 2011 On Tuesday night the Audio Publishers Association held its 16th annual Audies Gala in New York City. The press release says the event is often referred to as the "Oscars of the spoken word entertainment." I'm not sure about that, but it is an awards ceremony that honors audio books in 30 different categories including Multi-Voiced Performance, Audiobook Adaptation, Humor and Inspirational/Faith-Based Fiction. The Audiobook of the Year award went to one of the year's highest profile audiobooks-- "Life," the best selling autobiography of Keith Richards, narrated by Johnny Depp and Joe Hurley with Keith Richards (Hachette Audio). The Audies jury selected the book in part because it introduced new audiences to the audio-book format. Los Angeles Times ___ LIFE Takes Audie Award Tuesday, May 24, 2011 - by BWW News Desk New York based pop singer and songwriter, Joe Hurley, who narrated the critically acclaimed "LIFE" with Keith Richards and Johnny Depp, accepted the prestigious Best Audio Book Of The Year Award at tonight's 2011 Audie Awards Ceremony in New York City. "LIFE," the audio book released by Hachette Audio, captures the rock-n-roll spirit and life of Keith Richards and is narrated by Hurley and award winning actor Johnny Depp. The Audio book has won accolades since its release including New Yorker Magazine, Amazon's Best of 2010, Publisher's Weekly and numerous celebrities including Jimmy Vivino and Julie Sweeney to name a few. Hurley took the stage to accept the award and through a surge of emotions, told the story about seeing the Rolling Stones in London, his first rock concert, and now turning to this great privilege in his life which he simply described as a "helluva joy ride." Long considered the "Academy Award" amongst Audio Books Awards, "LIFE" competed against The Woody Allen Collection, written and narrated by the famed director himself and The Red Pyramid by Rick Riordan and narrated by Katherine Kellgren and Kevin P. Free for the award. "LIFE" also won "Biography Book of the Year" also accepted by Joe Hurley at the ceremony. "When I heard they needed me on this project, there were no questions asked," said Hurley. "I was sound checking 'Sing Me Back Home' in Paris when I got the call. I went straight to the airport flew for hours, lost my luggage and had no sleep but we recorded it on time and the result is this amazing memoir to music icon, Keith Richards, who I have the privilege of calling a personal friend." Talk Books World |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 26th, 2011 at 1:16pm From the Audies: Narrator Joe Hurley and Hachette Audio’s Michele McGonigle, winners of Audiobook of the Year for 'Life'. bookpage.com |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 28th, 2011 at 11:07am Excellent Pete Townshend piece in Intelligent Life. He's currently working on his autobiography, and Life came up in his conversation with Simon Garfield. I mention the success of Richards’s memoir. “The point is,” Townshend says, “when we read Keith Richards’s book, are we really reading who he is? James Fox [Richards’s ghost] is a brilliant writer. I think it’s sad that we will only remember Keith’s book because of what he said about the size of Mick’s [apparently modest] genitals. Which, by the way, to use an apt term, is bollocks. I’ve seen them, and they are not small. And it is not just the balls that are big.” :-X |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on May 28th, 2011 at 12:46pm
One of the best interviews ever. Pete was very thoughtful and forthcoming. I intend to buy his book.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on May 28th, 2011 at 1:36pm left shoe shuffle wrote on May 28th, 2011 at 11:07am:
Well leave it to Pete Townsend to have the ultimate word on the size of Mick Jagger's todger. :smilemick |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on May 28th, 2011 at 2:15pm sweetcharmedlife wrote on May 28th, 2011 at 1:36pm:
See that the Townshend quote's been cut and pasted @ iorr. Might also want to include the interviewer's name and source link for those interested in reading the full article... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Pdog on May 28th, 2011 at 4:04pm
but his balls are huge, and big balls are are cool, as you can tell, with tight pants, you can't help but look at his junk...
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Joey on May 28th, 2011 at 8:03pm
" I think it’s sad that we will only remember Keith’s book because of what he said about the size of Mick’s [apparently modest] genitals. Which, by the way, to use an apt term, is bollocks. I’ve seen them, and they are not small. And it is not just the balls that are big "
!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on May 28th, 2011 at 9:24pm
Interesting thought ~ MICK & Pete? :nomames LOL I guess Pete T had an eyeful of MICK's todger, maybe more! Thanks Pete for informing us KEEF was wrong about MICK's todger, but that raises the quesion HOW DOES HE KNOW? Gay in NY? Fag in LA? When the shit hits the fan, I'll be sittin on the can.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 11:12am left shoe shuffle wrote on May 10th, 2011 at 1:36pm:
Not suggesting that the Spike balloting's rigged or anything, but Keith will be in attendance at tomorrow's taping. Meanwhile, the estimable Ms. Polizzi's in Italy, filming 'Jersey Shore' and crashing into police cars. Even if the improbable does happen, he'll still take home the "Brass Balls Award" being presented by Robert De Niro. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 11:30am
What, Snooki didn't win! :wtf2
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by lavendar on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 8:24pm
I'm still reading...........LOL
{I got thru the first chapter I think} :aimama :boring :wtf1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Jun 4th, 2011 at 5:25pm
by John Tamny
What Keith Richards’ “Life” As a Rolling Stone Tells Us About Economics Jun. 4 2011 Image via Wikipedia Though Rolling Stones’ guitarist Keith Richards’ autobiography is a great read on its own for the remarkable story it tells, there are economic lessons within that apply to all manner of concepts made frequently prosaic by books and newspaper articles. From the wealth gap, to what drives success, to taxation, Richards’ amazing story explains them all in exciting, uplifting fashion. Considering the wealth gap, it’s often a confused concept. No doubt there are broad income differences throughout the world, but that’s frequently the case because the highest earners regularly reduce the lifestyle gap through innovations that make former luxuries quite commonplace. Richards revealed this numerous times in Life. Indeed, while Richards’ mother worked as a Hotpoint washing-machine demonstrator, “it took her ages to get her own.” Maytag and Sears come to mind as successful businesses headed by highly paid executives who achieved their pay by virtue of making washing machines broadly accessible. Richards also notes that his family “didn’t have a record player for a long time”, but thanks to innovators who were doubtless well compensated for mass producing the once obscure disc player, someone of Richards’ humble beginnings was eventually able to buy and play music. The above was particularly important when we consider Richards’ career path. As he put it, “I’ve learned everything I know off of records”, and “Being able to hear recorded music freed up loads of musicians that couldn’t necessarily afford to learn to read or write music, like me.” Economic commentators love to bash the rich as greedy, but the profit motive driving music industry executives provided Richards with a musical education on the relative cheap. Commentators regularly bemoan inequality in terms of opportunity while seeking government fixes, but Richards’ inspiring story reminds us that starting at the bottom is often a blessing. His first guitar cost 10 British pounds, but since his mother couldn’t afford to pay for it, she got someone else to purchase it, and then that someone eventually defaulted. Notable here is that Richards “couldn’t afford an electric” guitar, but his family’s inability to pay for an electric was instrumental in his rise as a guitar player. As he explained it, “I firmly believe if you want to be a guitar player, you better start on acoustic and then graduate to electric.” Rather than allow his reduced economic circumstances to act as a barrier to achievement, he accentuated the positive, that he had a guitar, and proceeded to “play every spare moment I got.” Clearly Richards started at the bottom, and had less financial resources to fund his development much as there’s inequality among children today, but this was no deterrent. Richards’ view is that “if you want to get to the top, you’ve got to start at the bottom, same with anything.” Wise words from a wise man, and something politicians would do well remember as they seek to achieve equality through legislative fiat. Being at the bottom often drives creativity, as Richards’ story attests. Thank goodness British politicians weren’t giving out electric guitars back in the ‘50s. Considering the Rolling Stones’ humble beginnings as a band, where they began and where they ended up exposes in living color the lie that says upward mobility is a myth. As Richards recounts about the Stones’ early days, “At the time poverty seemed constant, unmovable.” Living in a horrid Chelsea flat with Mick Jagger and Brian Jones, Richards tells the reader about live music venue Wetherby Arms, and how “Usually I’d go round the back and steal their empties and sell them back to them. You got a couple of pence on a beer bottle.” Every little bit counted because while the Rolling Stones sell out stadiums today, in the early ‘60s they were lucky if they got paid at all for their concerts. Modern theorists would call this exploitation as they do any time individuals or groups are “underpaid” in their eyes, but for the band these allegedly stingy concert promoters provided them with invaluable experience that eventually put them in a position to charge quite a bit. Still, at the time “hunger was the order of the day” given how bands almost by definition start at the bottom. Of course any profits they were able to cobble together went toward “guitar strings, mending amplifiers and valves. Just to keep what had going was an incredible expensive.” All of this can’t be stressed enough. For one, the fact that limited profits were immediately reinvested in the business that was the Rolling Stones reminds us how crippling corporate taxes can be, particularly on businesses just getting started. When politicians seek high taxes on businesses they’re robbing them of their future. Second, in the early days they desperately wanted a drummer by the name of Charlie Watts, but they couldn’t initially afford him. Again, when profits are taxed, the ability of a company to grow is compromised. The above deserves even more mention. So often we hear about “excess profits” used to pay “exorbitant salaries.” But as Richards noted time and again throughout Life, a bad band is a function of bad musicians. As he put it, “To a musician, playing below your mark is soul destroying”, and as such, the genius of the Rolling Stones was the accomplished nature of all the band’s musicians. Sure enough Richards recounts how Mick Jagger essentially tried to go solo on the cheap with unfortunate results. Talent matters, and it costs money. Considering the Stones’ eventual grand success, it can’t be stressed enough how much work it required to get to that point. Former Congressman Richard Gephardt once said that the rich, far from having achieved wealth through hard work, had simply won “life’s lottery.” The story of the Rolling Stones exposes Gephardt’s musings as patently absurd. Indeed, as Richards noted about the band’s early days, “Benedictines had nothing on us. Anybody that strayed from the nest to get laid, or try to get laid, was a traitor. You were supposed to spend all your waking hours studying Jimmy Reed, Muddy Waters, Little Walter, Howlin’ Wolf, Robert Johnson. That was your gig. Every other moment taken away from it was a sin.” Speaking of “gigs”, Richards recounts that “The gig never finished just because you got off stage.” Particularly during the early years, the band worked nearly non-stop with concert tours, then would immediately go back into the studio to record another album that would beget another tour. Richards has over the years played through fevers, a finger burned to the bone, and the death of a child. Commentators are often blinded by substantial wealth enjoyed by successful people, but they rarely acknowledge the hard work and personal sacrifice necessary to reach that point. That’s why the commentary suggesting the rich must “give back” has always bothered this writer. Implicit there is that they’ve taken something, rather than done something pleasing for consumers such that those same consumers have showered them with their dollars. Along the lines of the above, a more confiscatory estate tax is often trotted out as a way of equalizing wealth inequalities. Richards not surprisingly didn’t talk about the estate tax in Life, and happily kept his autobiography free of the nitwit political commentary that so often fills celebrity memoirs, but his story reminds us that we all stand on the shoulders of giants such that we’re the beneficiaries of success whether we inherit the fruits of success or not. Indeed, though Richards once worshipped and learned from Elvis Presley guitarist Scotty Moore from afar, “Now I know the man, I’ve played with him.” Richards wasn’t handed the money earned by Moore, or for that matter some of his other idols including Chuck Berry, Jimmy Reed and Bo Diddley, but their brilliance on the guitar surely informed his, which means Richards inherited something far greater than money. Considering income taxes more broadly, Richards exposes the hubristic absurdity of confiscatory rates. With England taxing the country’s highest earners at 83% by the 1970s, Richards saw those rates as the equivalent of “being told to leave the country.” And sure enough the Rolling Stones did just that. As Richards recounts, “The last thing I think the powers that be expected when they hit us with super-super tax is that we’d say, fine, we’ll leave. We’ll be another one not paying tax to you.” Of course that’s the beauty of wealth of the mind, as opposed to immovable wealth of the earth (think oil). Wealth of the mind which the Rolling Stones possessed in abundance made them highly mobile on the way to the band producing its classic album Exile on Main St. away from England in the South of France. England made the cost of success in the ‘70s expensive, so the Rolling Stones moved on. Amen. Considering trade, the deal that ensured the Rolling Stones’ long-term success was a 1965 contract with Decca Records. As Richards recalls, “It was an incredibly successful deal for both parties. Which is what a deal is supposed to be. I’m still getting paid off of it; it’s called the Decca balloon.” So often economic journalists decry imports given the belief that they weaken us, or that trade between “countries” must be balanced, but as Richards reminds, trade is always a two-way street whereby individuals exchange what they have for something they don’t. The Rolling Stones’ surplus was popular music, and they exchanged it with a company whose surplus was successful distribution of that music. Both sides made out big on their trade, and that describes trade more broadly. If left alone by governments, it involves individuals exchanging what they have for what they don’t, and it’s wealth enhancing for both sides. This should be remembered the next time some politician laments the opening of markets and the economic “losses” that will result from letting individuals transact with whomever they want, and without regard to country border. Lastly, a frequent question posed to Richards is “Why don’t you give it up?” Richards’ response, one that is typical of very successful individuals is that “I can’t retire until I croak. I don’t think they quite understand what I get out of this. I’m not doing it just for the money or for you. I’m doing it for me.” Richards has achieved on a stratospheric scale because he’s doing the work he loves for himself. Rich people tend to love what they do, so to achieve economic success it’s important to find something you enjoy so much that you’ll work incredible hours at it. In a fascinating book full of lessons, that’s the most important lesson of all. http://blogs.forbes.com/johntamny/2011/06/04/what-keith-richards-life-as-a-rolling-stone-tells-us-about-economics/ |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Jun 4th, 2011 at 6:25pm
The lesson here, what comes to mind, is in The Stones & Richard's early days, they paid their dues to get where they are, to get to the top one must start at the bottom, unlike today's big names who don't pay any dues, become big stars overnight, I consider Justin Beaver to just be a teenybopper idol, like Bobby Sherman, who made it strictly on the internet (from a Youtube video) but he's like the 4th or so richest guys around, probably never played a club, but this is a good example of how people make it today, Lady Ga Ga, another person who made it through the media of not having to start at the bottom to get to the top.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jun 8th, 2011 at 11:13am |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jun 14th, 2011 at 9:10am Win a copy of the book “Life” by Keith Richards - Listen to Ray Koob during the Jones for the Stones (9pm hour) of his 7p-Midnight show. He'll tell you what word to TEXT to MGKMGK. Each night we'll pick 1 random texter to win the following.... A copy of the book “Life” by Keith Richards "Life" available now in paperback. Courtesy of Spike's GUYS CHOICE Awards Texting not your thing? You can enter online here. For complete contest rules click here. WMGK |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jun 14th, 2011 at 6:04pm Heart Of Stone wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 6:25pm:
In fairness to her, she most certainly did 'start at the bottom'. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by gimmekeef on Jun 15th, 2011 at 3:27pm
Keef is getting a lot of accolades yet without Fox....how would this have been as a read I wonder?.....it was funny but found it boring in the middle with endless drug tales versus the music making....a bit "grumpy old man" if you ask me.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Edith Grove on Jun 22nd, 2011 at 5:36am
Keith Richards, Role Model
June 22, 2011 By Jim Hunt I had just turned 10 when I first saw the Beatles on "The Ed Sullivan Show." At that moment, I, like many others, knew that what I was witnessing was the most amazing thing in the world. Rock, long hair, screaming teen audience and parents who were completely shocked, dismayed and bewildered – what else could a young person ask for? That night, I decided that I had to play in a band, and my instrument of choice would be the drums. I could see myself in the back line, keeping the beat and holding it all together. My father, on the other hand, had a different opinion about me playing in a band – especially playing drums. My father is a classically trained choral director who found (at the time) the Beatles and others of that ilk to be a horrible blot on the word "music," and he was more than dismayed that I might take an interest in this sure-to-be-short-lived phenomenon. The next school year, in the sixth-grade band, I would have my first opportunity to play an instrument – an opportunity, in my mind, to begin to learn drums. Unfortunately, my father said that if I were to play in the band I would need to play a "real instrument," and the drums (in his mind) did not qualify. So, what was I to do? There was only one other option. The sixth grade at my school also had a ukulele band. It looked like a little guitar and had strings, and was the closest I was going to get to something that could lead me down the path to rock and roll. So from that point on, I was a guitar player. But if I couldn’t be Ringo, who would I be? Paul and John both played rhythm instruments, but they were both lead singers, too – definitely not "back-line" guys. George was almost in the back line, but he played lead, so that wouldn’t work. I was adrift in a Rock and Roll identity crisis until I found the answer: Keith Richards of the Rolling Stones. There he was, the consummate rhythm guitarist – a drummer in the guise of a guitar player – holding down the back line with Charlie Watts while Mick did his thing out front. That was what I wanted – what I needed to do. You knew just from watching them that while Mick was getting most of the glory, the band needed Keith more than anyone else if they were going to succeed. He was cool, confident and essential. From that point on, Keith Richards was my hero and my idol and the blueprint for what I hoped would be my rock and roll future. As was the case for many of us in the generation that was swept up in the British Invasion of the 60s, rock became (and remained) an avocation rather than a vocation. Over the years, I’ve played in my share of garage and cover bands, but my profession has been that of an educator. After finishing my undergraduate degree in education, I taught elementary and middle school for 12 years; after completing my graduate work, I taught in a teacher education program for 12 years. For the past 12 years, I have served as the provost and dean of the faculty for a small, residential liberal arts college. Over my 36-year career as an educator, you would think that someone might have replaced Keith as my idol – as my aspiration and inspiration – especially after I became a provost. Provosts should idolize great academic figures and thinkers, not Keith Richards. But I still, nevertheless, idolize Keith. For those of us who hold Keith in such high esteem, this past year provided numerous opportunities to indulge in our hero worship. With the release of Keith’s autobiography, Life, and all the interviews that surrounded its release, we were able to gain greater insights into Keith the person, not just Keith the musician. We learned about his philosophy toward music, bands and life in general in a way that gave us greater insights into what makes Keith be Keith. After gaining these insights and reflecting on the work that I do, I have come to the conclusion that being a provost at small, residential liberal arts college is like being the "Keith" at your institution. What follows are a four brief observations about what provosts can learn about their work from Keith Richards. Draw your satisfaction from "playing in the band." One of the things that becomes clear about Keith when you read his book is that he did not set out to be a star. That happened, but it was not his goal. What he wanted to do was play in a band. He wanted to be the foundation on which everything was built, but he didn’t need the spotlight. He could let Mick take the spotlight because that was what Mick and the Stones needed. But he also knew that without Keith there could be no Rolling Stones, and he drew his satisfaction (no pun intended – well, maybe a little) from knowing that. And although that relationship has had its ups and downs over the decades, it has worked for almost 50 years. A successful provost understands how this works in the academy. As a "Keith," you have to be willing to commit to the behind-the-scenes work – the stage-managing, if you will – that is necessary for your institution to succeed. You don’t worry about getting the credit as much as you focus on getting it done. Keith’s attitude is that it is all about the music, and it doesn’t matter who plays the note as long as the note gets played. A successful provost should adopt this philosophy in all the work that she or he does. One of Keith’s great quotes about Mick goes like this: "Vanity will not carry a band. But, a band can carry vanity" – an important motto for success as a provost. Make sure you have the right "Micks." At a small liberal arts college, the "Micks" will most likely be found within the faculty. In the same way that Keith and the Stones need Mick to front the band, a provost needs high-profile faculty members to front the academic program. That said, you need to make sure you have "Micks" who are congruent with and committed to the mission of the institution. Can you imagine Mick as a Beatle or in a band like Herman’s Hermits? It just wouldn’t work. Likewise, high-profile faculty members at a small liberal arts college who are not committed to teaching undergraduates won’t work either. It should also be acknowledged that, like Mick, high-profile faculty members will likely also possess a strong sense of self-importance. While this strong sense of self-importance may present problems from time to time (and it will), you can and should use it to the advantage of institution. These faculty members want the spotlight and you should give it to them. They are the "stars" of the institution and the reason that students want to attend. Let them be Mick. Try "alternative tunings." If you have ever tried to play guitar like Keith Richards, you know that to play some of their most notable songs, you can’t play in standard tuning. While he uses open E and D tuning on some songs, it is the open G tuning that is necessary for the signature Keith Richards sound. Get in open G, and you’ll sound like Keith. In his book, Keith talks about the importance of playing in open G – about how it allows one note to harmonize with another, creating beautiful resonances without you even putting your finger on a string. As a provost, you likely have a governance structure that (if you’re still willing to indulge this metaphor) is your “standard tuning” and the way things are usually done. Usually the players in this governance structure are selected to be there by their faculty colleagues. But there will be times when the existing structure simply will not create the resonance that the institution needs to unleash its creative energies. In these cases, you should be willing to consider “alternative tunings” by selecting faculty members to work on projects based not on whether it might satisfy institutional protocols or political sensibilities, but rather on the interest and competence of the faculty members as they align with the project. These kinds of committees are more likely to yield the results the institution needs. Don’t sweat the rumors. Over the years, there have been innumerable rumors and myths about Keith Richards – some based on fact and others not. In reading his book, I was struck by the fact that he has not spent much of his career trying to dispel the rumors and myths. I assume there are probably two reasons. First, he probably found many of them to be amusing and somewhat in keeping with his image, and second, because they simply were not true and were not worth the time and effort it would take to prove otherwise. The second reason is the one that holds a lesson for provosts. As you know, rumors abound on a college campus, particularly a small one. Rarely are they accurate, and they are always more interesting than the actual truth. Provosts will be tempted to try to address every little rumor, but be wary of taking too much time out of your day to do this. Let most of them just be noise in the channel and address only those that have real significance or importance to the functioning of the institution. Doing otherwise will simply leave you distracted, tired and wilted like a bouquet of dead flowers (O.K., another pun). So there it is – the musings of a provost who would like to think that somehow he has been able to emulate his hero even in a profession that is typically far removed from rock and roll. I will leave you with one final thought: Does a successful provost have to be a Keith? Or, said another way, can a successful provost be a Mick? My experience tells me that Micks who become provosts don’t stay provosts very long – they usually become presidents (that’s not to say that all presidents are Micks…). But provosts who are fulfilled by their Keith roles can be highly effective and serve their institutions well for many years. They understand that while you can’t always get what you want, if you try sometimes….well, you know the rest. Jim Hunt is provost and dean of the faculty and professor of education at Southwestern University, a liberal arts college in Georgetown, Texas. http://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2011/06/22/essay_comparing_being_a_provost_to_being_the_guitarist_keith_richards |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 12th, 2011 at 4:09pm From a Marianne Faithfull interview posted today @ Spinner: Jim Dyson, Getty Images You've written two autobiographies (1994's 'Faithfull' and 2007's 'Memories, Dreams and Reflections'). Did you have a chance to read Keith Richard's 'Life'? I did. Did you feel it was an accurate portrayal? Not completely accurate, no, but I liked it very much. I don't think accuracy really matters. What do you mean? I think he made a few mistakes. I wish he hadn't said those awful things about Mick, I think that was a bit much. I happen to know that Michael Peach is the editor and he's always been trying to get someone to say that. He wanted me to say that and I would never do it, but I would have gotten more money if I had. Spinner |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Jul 13th, 2011 at 10:59pm left shoe shuffle wrote on Jul 12th, 2011 at 4:09pm:
Blame it on the editor or KEEF did it for the money? I dont think it was for the money, but at least Marianne has enough class to leave MICK's shortcomings out of it! I love Marianne. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Jul 14th, 2011 at 6:02am Bitch wrote on Jul 13th, 2011 at 10:59pm:
Ya think? Did you read HER autobiography? :blankfriggingstare1 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 14th, 2011 at 11:12am left shoe shuffle wrote on Jun 8th, 2011 at 11:13am:
Good news. Snooki is working on a sequel to be released next year. http://books.usatoday.com/bookbuzz/post/2011/07/jersey-shore-party-girl-snooki-to-publish-second-book-in-2012/176767/1 Perhaps Keith could write one as well. Life was a great piece of fiction. :whatapostronnie |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by lavendar on Jul 14th, 2011 at 8:15pm
I'm still reading And I'm not even 1/2 thru :wtf1
I hope too finish it some day----------------- for rizzo 1 bourbon, 1 Jack and 1 BEER................... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Jul 14th, 2011 at 9:30pm
Maybe he should have called it "Lies" instead of "Life" - I'm not a fan of this award winning book. I've read Marianne's books so I was not surprised at the lack of importance she attaches to accuracy.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Jul 14th, 2011 at 9:51pm Gazza wrote on Jul 14th, 2011 at 6:02am:
YES I have read it and she doesnt mention the size of MICK's cock anywhere in it! Thats what I meant by MICK's 'shortcomings'. It was in Marianne's book which inspired me not to give up on somebody, because just one person did not gave up on her when she was down and out and half dead. So the positive influence from just one other person can be the difference between them holding on or giving up. And I remember her words whenever I see someone at the bottom and without hope, to extend a helping hand when nobody else does. She's been through alot of trouble and strife and she survived it all, thats why I like her so much. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Jul 16th, 2011 at 10:17am From Roger Daltrey's interview with Nicole Lampert in the Daily Mail: The pair (Daltrey and Townshend) have been together for 50 years since meeting at Acton County Grammar School in West London. They are as infamous for their rows as Mick Jagger and Keith Richards and Roger says they still fight like ‘cat and dog; it’s creative differences’. We talk about how the two Rolling Stones have fallen out over Richards’ book; in particular the claims that Mick is not well endowed. ‘If I was Mick I would just say, “Yeah, I’ve got a small ****, who cares? I’ve done all right with it!”’ cackles Roger. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by lavendar on Aug 21st, 2011 at 9:56pm
I'm about 1/2 way thru and
into the "PSyChEDElic" era Do you all remember those daze LOL ! {can't find the question mark} I'm enjoying reading it, how does one remember all those names! :forfucksake :wtf1 :smoking |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Aug 25th, 2011 at 3:02pm Keith Richards memoir 'Life' goes platinum August 25, 2011 (AP) NEW YORK — Keith Richards has gone platinum as an author. The Rolling Stones' memoir, "Life," has sold more than 1 million copies since coming out last fall. "Hail to the Keef!" Little, Brown and Company publisher Michael Pietsch said in a statement Thursday, noting that "Life" was among the best-selling rock memoirs of all time. The 67-year-old Richards received more than $7 million for his book, which received almost universal raves. AP Big ups to Keith! Hope there's a platinum seller of another sort in the not-too-distant future... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Aug 27th, 2011 at 10:18am
Rave reviews? Apparently no one checked mine. I wonder if Keith had it to do over again if he would change it. I'd like to think he would, but who knows? I think it was the final straw that broke the Stones. If that's the case, the prize would seem bittersweet.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Aug 27th, 2011 at 1:24pm
There has been much melodrama on this board over the impact Life has on the band. I don't think for a second that the book is on anyone's mind but Keith's and I don't think the book will stand in their way of getting together in the studio and getting on the road to make money.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Aug 27th, 2011 at 1:53pm Steel Wheels wrote on Aug 27th, 2011 at 1:24pm:
It will be interesting to see if $ will still be a strong enough motivator. I don't think it will be for Mick - and the real pity is that the book would have probably sold a million without the swipes Keith took at Mick. And I disagree that the book isn't on anyone's mind but Keith's. IF they tour again I think it will influence some to go just to see the interaction and others to stay home to avoid it. I'd like to see them all wind down their careers on a successful note - and so far so good. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Aug 27th, 2011 at 1:54pm Steel Wheels wrote on Aug 27th, 2011 at 1:24pm:
Only Time will tell, but I don't think their going to pass up the 50th anniversary for The Stones, but wouldn't they start to make arrangements now cause it's next year. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Sep 6th, 2011 at 5:12pm Rolling Stone Keith Richards wins GQ Writer of the Year award Rolling Stone Keith Richards was named Writer of the Year at the GQ Men of the Year Awards for his autobiography, Life, and disclosed that it is being made into a film. Keith Richards and Patti Hansen attend the GQ Awards, Sept. 6, 2011 Photo: REX By Anita Singh 06 Sep 2011 The problem, he said, will be finding an actor who can portray him on screen. “There are feelers out at the minute [but] I’m in no rush right at the moment. Also, how are they going to find me? The idea of a succession of Keith Richards coming down is horrifying,” he said. The award was presented by Johnny Depp, who would be the frontrunner to play Richards in any biopic. Depp famously used the Stones guitarist as inspiration for his Captain Jack Sparrow character in the Pirates of the Caribbean films. Richards’ autobiography won high praise when it was first published last year. It recounts his debauched adventures in rock’n’roll. Richards was among the famous faces who attended the awards ceremony at the Royal Opera House. The Telegraph |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Sep 6th, 2011 at 5:30pm
Wow!!! it's going to be made into a film?? there will have to be actors at different stages of his life to play Keith.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Sep 6th, 2011 at 7:09pm
Depp is almost a sure bet for playing Keith.
Who is going to play Anita, Patti...and for that matter - who plays Mick? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Sep 7th, 2011 at 10:03am AngieBlue wrote on Sep 6th, 2011 at 7:09pm:
Will a tiny todger be required? :scary |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by AngieBlue on Sep 7th, 2011 at 11:21am sweetcharmedlife wrote on Sep 7th, 2011 at 10:03am:
;D Let's hope that isn't a prerequisite. Otherwise, that casting agent is going to have a time. Yes, I see you have the talent, but I need you to drop trow. :Youmakeagrownmancrylikejoey |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Sep 7th, 2011 at 5:12pm
Daniel Day Louis is also an actor who would do Keith justice, I remember a film of his, about IRA bombings that based on a true story, I forget the name, but there's a scene where he was in London & could pass for Keith.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Sep 7th, 2011 at 5:23pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Steel Wheels on Sep 8th, 2011 at 6:53pm
I just want music.
So does anyone still think the book is hindering 2012 plans? Anyone??????????? |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Gazza on Sep 8th, 2011 at 6:57pm Steel Wheels wrote on Sep 8th, 2011 at 6:53pm:
Not in the slightest. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by lavendar on Sep 8th, 2011 at 8:11pm
anyone!!!!!
ahahahaha I'm STILL reading........ :D |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Sep 14th, 2011 at 4:04pm |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by luxury on Sep 14th, 2011 at 4:39pm
...paltry honor
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by lavendar on Sep 14th, 2011 at 5:33pm
LOL
Good one luxury |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 6th, 2011 at 8:42am Prestigious biography win for Keith Richards http://goo.gl/uFhs8 Keith Richards is to receive the 2011 Mailer Prize for Distinguished Biography for his bestselling autobiography Life, co-written with James Fox. The award will be presented by President Bill Clinton at a benefit gala in New York on 8 November. The Mailer Prize is distributed by the Norman Mailer Center and Writers Colony, a non-profit organisation which celebrates the legacy of Mailer, the author of some 40 novels and one of the most prolific American writers of the 20th century. Life is currently available in paperback. Orion Books Just a coupla guys talkin' books... http://goo.gl/I5sR5 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by LadyJane on Oct 6th, 2011 at 8:53am
Keith bashers be damned. :tongui
Congrats Lord Richards. He's amassing quite the collection of awards. They all can't be wrong!!! LJ. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 6th, 2011 at 9:06am
For various stupid reasons (work and stuff like that) Keith's book has been waiting on the shelf for quite a few months now for me to properly sit down and read it. Then I got the Depp-narrated audio book version and I started listening to it while reading at the same time (how nerdy is that ;D thank God the movie version hasn't come out yet :aimama )
I have to say that I find the book mighty fine so far - awards well deserved indeed. He has a way of telling stories, even more so his own story, feelings, images, sounds, all of it. He's really got some writing chops (even with the assistance of James Fox taken into consideration). I haven't reached the whole bashing Mick part yet, and though I do agree it's kind of tasteless and taking it too far (actually too low) even for Keith, but then again, you'd think Mick has heard worse from him all these years. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 6th, 2011 at 10:03am LadyJane wrote on Oct 6th, 2011 at 8:53am:
So I guess the Pulitzer is next? :nooslajaleisk |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 6th, 2011 at 11:33am Keith Richards By Dylan Jones Guitar god, heavyweight hedonist... literary lion. After 50 years in the Stones, Keith Richards this year sealed his status as rock's greatest survivor with his memoirs, Life. And what a life. Candid, clear-eyed and as addictive as its author's personality, it's arguably the greatest-ever rock & roll read. Here, Keef riffs with Dylan Jones on rolling back the years and an unexpected GQ award. Keith Richards has a face that conjures up many things. When he walks into his manager Jane Rose's downtown Manhattan offices, it strikes me that he looks like a slightly ruined country house, with a leathery and runnelled face. As I shake his hand I'm thinking that this is probably what WH Auden would have looked like if he had worn leather trousers, or a cape. In different dress, Keith could also pass for an Afghan tribal leader, something that would probably please him. We are meeting today, in early June, to talk about Keith Richards winning this year's GQ Writer Of The Year award for Life, the autobiography he crafted with the help of his friend James Fox. Life is probably the best rock & roll memoir ever written, easily as good as Bob Dylan's Chronicles: Volume 1, but six times longer. It is the result of painstaking research (140 people are thanked in the book, many of whom Fox interviewed in order to fill in the hulking great gaps in Keith's memory), an eye and an ear for detail, and the 67-year-old's engaging way with an anecdote. Oh, and it is also one of the greatest rock & roll stories ever told, ever lived. Which is probably why the book has been so monumentally successful. It's all here: sex, violence, drugs, myth-making, the character traits of some of the world's most famous people, and, of course, the truth about the ancient art of weaving. While it is written chronologically, it pinballs all over the place just when you least expect it, painting a believable, vividly colourful picture. There are some especially evocative passages about London after WWII, passages that go a long way to establishing why Keith ended up as "Keef". The thing that struck me most when I first read it - and indeed, reviewed it at the time - was the refreshing way in which Keith discussed his monstrous drug-taking: not in a self-congratulatory way, but in extremely matter-of-fact terms. There are fascinating descriptions of what it's like to exist on heroin, extraordinary passages outlining his motivations for being under the influence, and wonderful accounts of Keef using drugs as though they were gears. Keith and I chatted for two hours, in a suite of offices full of Stones paraphernalia: a doll based on his character in Pirates Of The Caribbean: At World's End; a poster advertising the Martin Scorsese documentary Shine A Light; piles of tour T-shirts; acres of gold discs; a signed poster advertising their infamous 1972 tour; imprints of Life; a Diamond Award presented to Jane Rose in recognition of Hot Rocks 1964-1971's 12 million American sales; and a huge painting of the world's greatest rock & roll guitarist, memoirist and raconteur. As we talked, I was overwhelmed by a very odd sensation, one I rarely experience: this, I thought to myself, is a privilege. Dylan Jones: Keith, we share an agent, the man you've rechristened Ed "F***ing" Victor. Did you do a beauty parade of agents for the book? Keith Richards: No. Ed was the person I wanted. Obviously, I drew up a shortlist, but it was always Ed F***ing Victor! And then he went to work on it, which was amazing. I wasn't involved in the business end of it, but Ed did everything and more that was asked of him. And I have to tip my hat constantly to James Fox for the way it was put together. They're my stories, but the way he crafted them, I couldn't have written it that way myself. Up until Life, Bob Dylan's Chronicles had set a new bar for rock autobiographies... That was the other thing I couldn't go through, trying to outdo somebody else's. Everybody's got a different way of telling a story - and has different stories to tell. But Chronicles was fantastic. That was the benchmark. When we started, I told James a few school stories and said this is what I remember. But within a week, James had found the guy I was talking about, and got the confirmation that this story would hold up. After that, I started to get more confidence in my memory. I mean, it's been pretty fried. Why did you decide to do the book? The Stones had just finished the last tour, having been away for three years, and I knew there was going to be an inevitable gap where we would all be sitting around thinking about what's going to happen next. And the idea came up just at that moment, and it seemed the perfect thing to keep me occupied. It just seemed the right point in the story so far. And then other things fell into place and I knew that I had a couple of years to do it, basically. What did you want to achieve with the book? I just wanted to tell it from my point of view, and the incredible escapades we got involved in. It would be enough for most people's lifetimes if just one of those things happened to them. But I wasn't expecting the incredible reception that it's got. It's got me into a semiliterate area - people thought I was just a moron. I've actually got to like critics in the last year! It's like, "Wow, thanks pal, let me buy you a drink!" I thought they were going to drag me through the mud, as I'm used to that, but in actual fact it sort of elevated my opinion of myself. I don't want get big-headed here, as I always play myself down, but I've been pleased. To me, my biggest fear is getting a big head, and that is when I get the hammer. Because it's very easy in this game to believe you're something special. Just look at Brian Jones - he died from it. You've been fairly transparent about the partnership between you and James, and that's earned you a lot of credit. I couldn't have told the story without him. In some uncanny way he captured the strength and breadth of the story. I've been friends with James for years, so he was used to my rhythm of speech. It helps that he's also a very good blues guitar player. So when I'd run out of ideas or taped the stories, we'd sit down and play some blues. But it's weird to drag through your whole life, because in the process you're actually living the damn thing twice. As we went on I was shocked by thinking, "How did one guy go through all this?" And then I realised it was me! It put my past into a more coherent perspective. Before doing the book I'd look upon my life as incredible, disconnected episodes, and in the process of doing the book I managed to make sense of it. When I finished I felt more exhausted than after three years touring with the Stones. I felt a weight had been lifted off my shoulders. What did you learn about yourself writing the book? That I'm a much meaner bastard than I thought. But at the same time, I realised how much friendship had meant to me, and how much my friendship had meant to other people, which I hadn't thought about before. This is the rock & roll life, and you had to invent it as you went along. There was no textbook to say how you operate this machinery. You didn't know you were always walking on the edge of disasters, and there's nobody to turn to and say, "How did you feel?" because no one had been there before. It was very exciting. Still is, in a way. There are loads of things people wish I'd done, and some things I wish I'd done! You become a cartoon character, and I can play that to the hilt, and I know that people have come up with a great story and they go, "He didn't do it, but if he'd thought about it and he'd been there, he would have done it." You were the rock & roll blueprint. I hope so, and it's very nice of you to say so. You're also very self-deprecating in the book... I've slowly grown into that. When you're supported by millions all over the world, you can either go nuts, or try to feed off the goodwill. I always felt that it was my job to give back to them as much as possible. I want to make better records, better shows. So it's about reciprocation - there are millions of fans, and if you get that feedback, especially from an early age, it's indescribable. It's the same with the Beatles, John Lennon in particular. It's something you have to handle all the time. I've never taken it for granted. I just happened to be at the right place at the right time. You spend a long time describing London after WWII. Even though my memory of the war is pretty much nonexistent, as I was only 18 months old, I still had a sense of sirens and collective fears. But as you're growing up in the Fifties, you're thinking this has got to change, it's too tight, the atmosphere, it's too restricted. The others running the joint want us to go back to the Thirties and we can't. And I guess as I was reaching the age of 15, 16, you've got the energy and you're bursting to escape. Plus, I fell in love with blues music, and that was where you found roots and a form of expression we didn't have in England. But as I was growing up, my mother was listening to a lot of Billie Holiday and Ella Fitzgerald... You hear things on the BBC, and then you start to bump into other guys who are into it, too; you realise it isn't just you sitting in a council flat. There are other guys out there listening to music, and somebody's got a new record from America and you're immediately at their house. You bring a bottle of beer - that was your entrance fee - and you sit around and listen to records, which is nuts but it's beautiful. It was very innocent. Were there parts you really didn't look forward to writing? I really didn't want to go through and remember the death of my son. You spend a lot of time trying to bury that kind of s***, not bringing it up again. That was the hard one for me, to relive that. You don't forget s*** like that. In the book you describe using drugs as gears. What gear are you in these days? I'm pretty much in neutral. How many stories couldn't you include? There were a lot for legal reasons. Especially concerning families who didn't even know that one of their relations was a drug dealer. A lot of my friends were very well brought-up boys, and I wouldn't want to upset the family just to name somebody. Everybody was experimenting and everybody was a pirate, especially in those days. In the club subculture, actually in every sort of culture, there are some very interesting people down there, but it's a great leveller where you find out who's one of our people or who's full of s***; who would stick by your side in a tough situation, and who would rat you out. It's not the most pleasant world to be in, but I do think it's kind of necessary to keep one foot in the gutter. Why? Because I never trusted the pavement. Has this given you a taste for doing a bit more writing? Yeah, there is talk about that, but basically I want to get the Stones back together and give it one more bash. I think they've got it in them. But it's about timing and an awful lot of very careful diplomacy. Mick didn't love the book, did he? Mick was obviously a bit peeved, but that was yesterday and this is today. We're two guys divided by life. Did you read Ronnie Wood's book? Well, I think he tossed it off. Even Ronnie would admit that. Ronnie's got a much better story to tell than that book, that's all I can say. Charlie's book is the one I really want to read. You haven't glamorised being on the road. It actually wasn't a very glamorous life; it was a lot of hard slog, a lot of hard work. We were taking care of two hours on the stage and the rest of it; I wouldn't wish it on anybody. How do you feel when you go back to Britain? It's the only place in the world where I feel like a tourist, just because of the obvious changes. I always feel like a stranger, but I'm sure if I stayed there for a year that feeling would disappear. It's just that I'm not there a lot. But I do love the old country. Get me down to Sussex and you have to dig me out. Six months before the book came out I bumped into David Remnick, the editor of the New Yorker, and all he could talk about was your book. He said that he was hoping you were going to explain the open G tuning. Which you did! I'm amazed by that part of the book, and how much response I've got from the guitar players of this world. It's so difficult to put on to the page how you play an instrument, and I was amazed by the fact that I can, and I apparently made it fairly comprehensive. It's got a lot of tips in there, and that was the one difficulty for me and James - I didn't know how to put it into words. I know you have to do this and put this there, but on the page that will look dopey. But the translation worked. And is there going to be a movie of the book? Yeah, there are feelers out at the minute. I'm in no rush right at the moment. Also, how are they going to find me? The idea of a succession of Keith Richards coming down is horrifying. Maybe when I'm dead and gone they can make a movie of it. Originally published in the October 2011 issue of British GQ. GQ Nice read. Interview was done in June, so Keith's clearly been chomping at the bit Stones-wise. "We're two guys divided by life" is quite the double entendre... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by steel driving hammer on Oct 6th, 2011 at 12:04pm
I'm actually starting to believe Keith IS God.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by luxury on Oct 6th, 2011 at 12:08pm
Keith wouldnt need all that "diplomacy" if he hadnt slagged off his writing partner and decided to talk about the (supposed) size of his dick! I remember a photo of Keith looking down at Mick's wares in a dressing room, prolly in the 70's--like he was checkin it out!
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Ginda on Oct 6th, 2011 at 1:04pm
Keith and I agree on one thing - he is a much meaner bastard than either one of us thought. To this day I regret reading his book. It wasn't only the juvenile comment about Mick - I expected more self-awareness from a man of his talent and years.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by luxury on Oct 6th, 2011 at 3:42pm
yeah, like who the hell has ever heard a grown man talk about the size of his friend's cock, let alone write about it?? I, too, am sorry I ever read the book. He's diminished in my eyes.
and Ronnie doesnt really say Keith is working on a record, he says something to the effect that he is laying down some tracks or whatever. All talk, no action. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Teiz on Oct 6th, 2011 at 4:53pm
I don't care how many awards Keef gets for this one: I still think it's a poorly written book. He thought he was being the cool kid but is destroying a part of his legacy by presenting himself as a 15-year old. He brags about the wrong kind of things.
It's been my main beef with the Stones for years: they surround themselves with people who are in awe about working with the Stones. so you get shitty side-projects like this one. I still love the man's music though. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Heart Of Stone on Oct 6th, 2011 at 5:11pm luxury wrote on Oct 6th, 2011 at 3:42pm:
I agree, Keith has always been in mature, he's never grown up. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 6th, 2011 at 5:16pm luxury wrote on Oct 6th, 2011 at 3:42pm:
I don't regret reading or buying the book. But I'm definitely not among those who think it was very well written and a good read....As for Keith's working on a record, there is more to it. Check out this thread from IORR. TeddyB1018 usually posts good info. http://www.iorr.org/talk/read.php?1,1413342,page=8 |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by lavendar on Oct 6th, 2011 at 5:31pm
It Is What It Is.
Keith penned an award Book. and we all read it, i kinda stopped at Altamont, butttt I do plan on finishing it. So critical sometimes on this board. :wtf1 The Idea man by Paul Allen sounds like a good read too, reminds me of The Facebook movie. Interesting...... |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by FotiniD on Oct 6th, 2011 at 6:04pm
As I said, I'm still in its beginning, but I don't see how Keith comes off as anything else othern than the usual Keith - he's been bashing Mick for years, he's been putting out the Almighty Keith Richards act even longer, he's been known to say nasty things and then dismiss them like it was nothing. So what else is new? This is all part of what we love about him, so why are you guys disappointed? :scary
He's getting older - to me that's the only difference. And that GQ interview was a mighty fine one. I love the pun in the "We're two guys divided by life" quote. So witty and clever. I can't NOT love the guy :keithpunky |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Teiz on Oct 6th, 2011 at 6:06pm
@Lavendar: I think it's normal that the people who followed Keef's career as fans are critical on a biography that hops from a drug bust to a bathroom set on fire to calling Mick, Brian or Bill a dick to a drug bust to...etc.. We kinda knew what was coming, but he is at a point in his life where he could at least try look back and view the bigger picture instead of acting like a kid.
But don't let me and the other sour grapes keep you from having fun reading this book. Life kind of split the votes. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by angee on Oct 6th, 2011 at 8:07pm
I quite enjoyed the book, some parts more than others, sure.
I wonder if expectations play the biggest role in whether or not people like it. If people think Keith really is a rock hero, and that along with his musicianship, he is super-kind, cooler than cool, and wiser than almost anybody, then they might be disappointed at what comes through in reading the autobiography. To me, the fact of becoming famous at a very early age has shaped the lives of each of the Stones. Keith retreated into drugs, as he writes, rather than, say, becoming addicted to the fame, as he writes of Mick. Either way, none of them lived much of a normal life, or developed in the usual course, with the possible exception of Charlie. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Oct 9th, 2011 at 9:41am Gladwell's Favorite Literary Outliers Inspired by his latest book, Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell shares his favorite books that feature outliers of one kind or another. Malcolm Gladwell Oct 7, 2011 Ever since writing Outliers, I've been a sucker for books either about or by people who are on the fringes of society—either by virtue of their talent or their beliefs. Life by Keith Richards http://goo.gl/7CE0k This may seem a strange book to lump in here. But Keith Richards turns out to be an extraordinary character. I knew the Rolling Stones music, of course. But I only had the dimmest impression of him. And he turns out to be far more of a musical genius that I had imagined, far more intelligent and thoughtful than I had imagined, and far more insane than I had ever thought possible. I really started this book by accident, and then couldn't put it down. He's really one of the great cultural characters of the 20th century, who was perfect for his time and place and perfectly matched with Mick Jagger (despite the fact that Richards takes one passive-aggressive shot after another at Jagger throughout the whole book). The Daily Beast |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by left shoe shuffle on Nov 7th, 2011 at 6:05pm Keith Richards' "Life" to Receive Literature Award from Blues Foundation in February http://goo.gl/qmd1i KeithRichards.com Keith Richards will receive yet another award for his acclaimed 2010 biographical foray into the literary world, Life. The Rolling Stones guitarist will be presented with the Literature prize at the Keeping The Blues Alive Awards 2012, which will take place February 4 in Memphis. Organized by The Blues Foundation, the annual awards are chosen by a panel of blues professionals and honor non-performers who have made significant contributions to the music genre. "This year's recipients showcase the breadth and diversity of the blues music community," Blues Foundation executive director Jay Sieleman said in a statement. "The honorees range from a Mississippi juke joint to a Polish blues festival, from an educator specializing in the diddley bow and the khalam to one of rock's most legendary guitarists." In September, Richards was honored as the UK version of GQ magazine's Writer of the Year, while this Tuesday, Bill Clinton will present him with the Distinguished Biography Prize at the Norman Mailer Center's third annual Benefit Gala in New York City. ABC News |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by stonedinaustralia on Nov 7th, 2011 at 11:01pm
Further to comments above I don't think from a literary point of view it was very good at all.
Apart from the opening pages (which were like ersatz HST in fear and loathing in las vegas) it basically read like one big Keith interview. Anecdotes and insights were (mostly) informative and entertaining but as written prose (imho) not that impressive Compare with dylan's chronicles or Chuck's autobiography |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Nellcote on Nov 8th, 2011 at 6:02am
I read one chapter & put it away.
Ghost writing does nothing for me. It's understandable Mick is torqued off. Pickup Mac's "All The Rage" for a good read of rock behind the scenes. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by sweetcharmedlife on Nov 8th, 2011 at 1:16pm
If Keith wants to keep the blues alive. Get on stage and play some. Never mind his crappy book. :wtf1
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Nov 8th, 2011 at 2:14pm Nellcote wrote on Nov 8th, 2011 at 6:02am:
Love it, like it, or hate it, there's one thing the book is not -- and that's "ghostwritten." The thing basically reads like a transcript of an audio interview with Keith. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Nellcote on Nov 8th, 2011 at 2:26pm Mel Belli wrote on Nov 8th, 2011 at 2:14pm:
With all due respect, I have a nice set of bridges to sell you. |
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Mel Belli on Nov 8th, 2011 at 5:07pm
I'm not trying to diminish the role James Fox had in the project, but there's nothing in the book that I can't honestly hear Keith saying in his own voice.
|
|
Title: Re: Keith Richards - Life Post by Bitch on Dec 3rd, 2011 at 8:44am
This is from the NY Public Library where Keef did his book signing. I joined the NYPL just for a chance to get in but it sold out on 12 seconds, literally. Anyway, someone did a nice little video capsule of KEEF's comments from that day. Check it out!
http://www.lstudio.com/co...ds-on-his-book-life.html |
|
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |