Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board

Free optional entertainment since (at least) 14 July 1998
...
In memory of Tom Layhue (TomL, Sai Wong, Willie Dixon)
With Sir Moonie, Fleabit Peanut Monkey, and Nanky © NFI but thanks!r!

...
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
Home Help Search Login Register Broadcast Message to Admin(s)


Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional" (Read 3,202 times)
Edith Grove
Agent Provocateur
*****
Offline


Disco STILL sucks!

Posts: 12,336
New Orleans
Gender: male
Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Oct 28th, 2014 at 2:58pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
At 1:19


Back to top
 

“What rap did that was impressive was to show there are so many tone-deaf people out there,” he says. “All they need is a drum beat and somebody yelling over it and they’re happy. There’s an enormous market for people who can’t tell one note from another.” - Keef
 
IP Logged
 
Mr. Yeats
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Nothing beats fun for
a good time.

Posts: 704
Gender: male
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #1 - Oct 28th, 2014 at 5:25pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
pffft...

Woody, in his biography, said the first time he met Dylan they were chatting away and Peter Grant was walking around being his usual boorish self telling everyone "I manage Led Zeppelin". When he got to Woody and Bob, he made this same declaration. Dylan reportedly told Grant "that's your problem, pal"
Back to top
 

Here comes everybody.
 
IP Logged
 
lavendar
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,074
Buffalo,NY
Gender: female
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #2 - Oct 28th, 2014 at 8:34pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
They Sure do a Good Job of Stirring the World ...(The Stones)
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 29th, 2014 at 8:56am by lavendar »  
 
IP Logged
 
The Wick
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 968
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #3 - Oct 29th, 2014 at 4:15am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
It's amazing how many of these miserable twats from that generation chime in with their comments about the Stones. It's all rooted in jealousy and they're all pissed off that the Stones shagged the best looking girls and made the best records while they could never write songs as good as the Stones and make records that came close to the Stones. No band is more overrated than Led Zeppelin. Because of my love for the Stones, everyone always plays the one song they tell me that will turn me on to Zeppelin, but I haven't heard a single thing I like. All of it is utter crap.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
wiseblood
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Wading pools and beer
on a hot summer day...

Posts: 141
Boston, MA
Gender: male
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #4 - Oct 30th, 2014 at 1:38am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
I like Zep very much, but I will say this about their music: it hasn't aged very well.  There is something intrinsically "70s" about their sound that never attached itself to the Stones catalog.  Sure, you can listen to "She's A Rainbow" and put a definite date on it, but that song would work wonderfully in the 21st century if someone were to cover it - just like at the end of SNL a couple years ago.

I've been pretty down on Zep for a while.  All Page wants to do is rehash and resell all the old Zep catalog while NEVER moving his career into the present.  It's old.  HE'S old. 

At this point I listen to the Stones far more than Zep because the Stones managed to make some real timeless music.  Zep on the other hand wants to cater to 15 year old boys and talk about the Lord Of The Rings characters.  Pretty boring to me now at 35.
Back to top
 

Come on queenie, let's shake it.
 
IP Logged
 
Steel Wheels
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Much love and support
to my dear friend Mary!

Posts: 2,657
2,000 Light Years From Home
Gender: male
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #5 - Oct 30th, 2014 at 8:42am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Pay this stuff no mind, especially since the quote is definitely out of context here.
Back to top
 

I LIVE FOR THE ROLLING STONES!
Registered: Aug 2003, Posts on the old board: 1120
Devoted Stones fan since time began. SMILE. THE ROLLING STONES ARE HERE.

...
 
IP Logged
 
Some Guy
Resident Cretin
*****
Offline



Posts: 15,824
Atlanta
Gender: male
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #6 - Oct 30th, 2014 at 9:01am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
rubbish.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lavendar
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,074
Buffalo,NY
Gender: female
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #7 - Oct 30th, 2014 at 9:15am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
I LOVE  Zeppelin Too
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sirmoonie
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline



Posts: 3,477
Gender: male
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #8 - Oct 30th, 2014 at 2:38pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
I was never as down on Zep as most here are (but I also keep in mind the majority of posters here have the Eagles as top tier band).  But to even compare them to the Rolling Stones in any sense is just Magoo.  No rational music fan of any stripe could find Rolling Stones music boring.
Back to top
 

"But in terms of what's left of white people, we're still it." - Andrew Moof Oldham
 
IP Logged
 
WaiteringOnAFiend
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,426
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #9 - Oct 31st, 2014 at 12:05am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
They are at least semi-professional at the mo, shirley, and it's all really rather lovely.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
riffkeither
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Gimme Some Neck !!

Posts: 678
France Marseille
Gender: male
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #10 - Oct 31st, 2014 at 6:30am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Rubbish , cause it's out of context .

Only the setlist are boring these years not the Stones !
Back to top
 

I've dealt with my ghosts and I've faced all my demons...
I'm movin' on
 
IP Logged
 
gorda
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Rocks Off Rules You Bastards

Posts: 1,131
Gender: female
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #11 - Nov 9th, 2014 at 9:17am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Led Zepplin and the Stones are BOTH classic bands.  I prefer the Stones.  But, Led Zepplin is pretty good too.

I love singing along to Black Dog at the top of my lungs.

"Hey, hey, mama, said the way you move, Gonna make you sweat, gonna make you groove  . . . "
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Paranoid Android
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


The Rocks Off Ladies Rule
You Bastards!!

Posts: 5,965
Chapel Hill, NC
Gender: male
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #12 - Nov 9th, 2014 at 12:50pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
That description certainly fits at the moment...dunnit?
Back to top
 

.........
 
IP Logged
 
Bitch
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


I always get my Rocks
Off!

Posts: 4,900
FL - USA
Gender: female
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #13 - Nov 9th, 2014 at 9:02pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Zep rocks, but The Stones rule and have NEVER been boring!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
stonedinaustralia
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


wake up crackers or we
all through!!

Posts: 859
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #14 - Nov 10th, 2014 at 2:43am
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Well just to play devil's advocate and saying that I don't mind bits of Zep - physical graffiti in particular - if you watch the clip in the OP it seems to say the comment was made in connection with Jones being the strings arranger on Satanic Majesties.

Based on what I have read he isn't the first to comment on the sometimes tedious and disorganized nature of the Stones' creative process.

I recall an interview with Jeff Beck who was asked about his  "audition" in '75. Among other things he said he could never work with Stones full time because he wasn't "into chaos".

Also Jimmy Miller and others have remarked that the band would play around for HOURS slightly out of time and/or tune unit at last something would come over Keith and he would look Charlie in the eye and then -bang - it would all come together. Or play tumbling dice for HOURS on end until one take , barely discernible as different from the dozens that preceded it, would be deemed acceptable by Keith.

On the other hand if you check out the Stones' scenes in 1+1 , as drawn out as it is, you can see the method in their madness.

And all those abandoned ideas, alternative versions and aimless jams have made for some excellent outtakes.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 10th, 2014 at 3:19am by stonedinaustralia »  

"you can see it against the girl's crocheted dress"
 
IP Logged
 
Mr. Yeats
Rocks Off Regular
*****
Offline


Nothing beats fun for
a good time.

Posts: 704
Gender: male
Re: Rolling Stones are "boring and unprofessional"
Reply #15 - Nov 10th, 2014 at 7:31pm
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
stonedinaustralia wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 2:43am:
Well just to play devil's advocate and saying that I don't mind bits of Zep - physical graffiti in particular - if you watch the clip in the OP it seems to say the comment was made in connection with Jones being the strings arranger on Satanic Majesties.

Based on what I have read he isn't the first to comment on the sometimes tedious and disorganized nature of the Stones' creative process.

I recall an interview with Jeff Beck who was asked about his  "audition" in '75. Among other things he said he could never work with Stones full time because he wasn't "into chaos".

Also Jimmy Miller and others have remarked that the band would play around for HOURS slightly out of time and/or tune unit at last something would come over Keith and he would look Charlie in the eye and then -bang - it would all come together. Or play tumbling dice for HOURS on end until one take , barely discernible as different from the dozens that preceded it, would be deemed acceptable by Keith.

On the other hand if you check out the Stones' scenes in 1+1 , as drawn out as it is, you can see the method in their madness.

And all those abandoned ideas, alternative versions and aimless jams have made for some excellent outtakes.

Good points, mate. And true. But the Stones' modus operandi worked, and still makes many, many acts - including Led Zeppelin - sound quite tame in comparison.

Another thing Jeff Beck said about the 'Black and Blue' sessions/auditions: "The Stones can't play funk". Oh really?
And this coming from a guy who was soon to start recording with Jan Hammer...has Beck ever sounded stiffer and more mechanical?
Back to top
 

Here comes everybody.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Gazza, Voodoo Chile in Wonderland)