ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl
GENERAL >> MAIN BOARD >> Post New Stones Album Info Here:
http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1461014064

Message started by Ian Billen on Apr 18th, 2016 at 4:14pm

Title: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Apr 18th, 2016 at 4:14pm


If you would .... Post information or tid-bits about the new / upcoming Stones album here...

Word has it they are currently at work on it and it is scheduled to be released this year some time (most likely in the mid-fall).


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by patioaintdry on Apr 18th, 2016 at 9:36pm
Is mid-fall considered mid-October? Early November? Because some people consider Early November to be late fall, even early winter.

I ask because I'm trying to get a good understanding of when the record might come out. Mid fall in Mexico City might be December. Then again, it's always pretty much - with the exception of 3 weeks in August - mid fall to early winter in friggin Belfast. Again, I want to understand when the record is arriving. I cannot event think about Australia and when their mid-fall, er, falls.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Apr 19th, 2016 at 12:24am

patioaintdry wrote on Apr 18th, 2016 at 9:36pm:
Is mid-fall considered mid-October? Early November? Because some people consider Early November to be late fall, even early winter.

I ask because I'm trying to get a good understanding of when the record might come out. Mid fall in Mexico City might be December. Then again, it's always pretty much - with the exception of 3 weeks in August - mid fall to early winter in friggin Belfast. Again, I want to understand when the record is arriving. I cannot event think about Australia and when their mid-fall, er, falls.



____________________________________



All this is pure speculation ... but it 'appears' The Stones will resume 'performing live' activity in October. I'd expect the new album to come out right around that same time.

They are talking about playing a the big music festival known as Coachella on October 7th. I'd expect their own set of shows to be in planning to occur right around the same time ....with the release of the album to coincide with that

... This is all and only based because if they are to be performing live around October... I'd say almost ...'positively'... the album would surely be out / released at that same time. 



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Apr 19th, 2016 at 10:52am
What's going on here?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Joey on Apr 19th, 2016 at 10:54am

Some Guy wrote on Apr 19th, 2016 at 10:52am:
What's going on here?




<  ----- Stones playing Coachella   ....... In OCTOBER !!!!!!!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Apr 19th, 2016 at 11:01am

Some Guy wrote on Apr 19th, 2016 at 10:52am:
What's going on here?


Well, it ain't Marvin Gaye.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Apr 19th, 2016 at 11:07am
I want some piano and harmonica and slide guitars and Mick backing up Mick on vocals.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Apr 19th, 2016 at 11:33am
How 'bout some cryin' in yer beer music ?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Apr 19th, 2016 at 11:48am

Edith Grove wrote on Apr 19th, 2016 at 11:33am:
How 'bout some cryin' in yer beer music ?


My sources tell me that The New Album is titled Mission Accomplished.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sirmoonie on Apr 19th, 2016 at 3:08pm
Timed to coincide with US Presidential election.  We will get Stones and Trump combo, as ordained.

Moof.

Hey diddle diddle, the cat and the fiddle.

Let us behold.  Fish.

Magoo? 

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Zack on Apr 19th, 2016 at 5:19pm

Some Guy wrote on Apr 19th, 2016 at 10:52am:
What's going on here?



Ian's making it happen, man.  Go with it.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Apr 19th, 2016 at 7:17pm

patioaintdry wrote on Apr 18th, 2016 at 9:36pm:
Is mid-fall considered mid-October? Early November? Because some people consider Early November to be late fall, even early winter.

I ask because I'm trying to get a good understanding of when the record might come out. Mid fall in Mexico City might be December. Then again, it's always pretty much - with the exception of 3 weeks in August - mid fall to early winter in friggin Belfast. Again, I want to understand when the record is arriving. I cannot event think about Australia and when their mid-fall, er, falls.



Does that mean that the album comes out in 2 weeks in Australia and New Zeland?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Apr 19th, 2016 at 11:21pm

Not sure how accurate or legit this is but supposedly Ronnies son gave a little insight on the new album and what they got going (like father ...like son eh? :D).

He says it is 'different' .... as in not the norm for them... (though that isn't exactly telling us much).

See it here (IF this article is legit / accurate):

https://www.list.co.uk/article/79833-rolling-stones-record-different-lp/


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 20th, 2016 at 7:58am

Paranoid Android wrote on Apr 19th, 2016 at 7:17pm:

patioaintdry wrote on Apr 18th, 2016 at 9:36pm:
Is mid-fall considered mid-October? Early November? Because some people consider Early November to be late fall, even early winter.

I ask because I'm trying to get a good understanding of when the record might come out. Mid fall in Mexico City might be December. Then again, it's always pretty much - with the exception of 3 weeks in August - mid fall to early winter in friggin Belfast. Again, I want to understand when the record is arriving. I cannot event think about Australia and when their mid-fall, er, falls.



Does that mean that the album comes out in 2 weeks in Australia and New Zeland?

Yes and Japan gets bonus tracks.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Apr 20th, 2016 at 1:39pm

Ian Billen wrote on Apr 19th, 2016 at 11:21pm:
Not sure how accurate or legit this is but supposedly Ronnies son gave a little insight on the new album and what they got going (like father ...like son eh? :D).

He says it is 'different' .... as in not the norm for them... (though that isn't exactly telling us much).

See it here (IF this article is legit / accurate):

https://www.list.co.uk/article/79833-rolling-stones-record-different-lp/


Ian



Good work Ian!


Speaking to BANG Showbiz, Tyrone said: "I've heard snippets of the album, yes, it's amazing. It's different - I can't say different how, cause I wouldn't want to ruin it - but it's good."


What do you think he means by that Ian?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Joey on Apr 20th, 2016 at 4:59pm


" I LOVE YOU ALL !!!!!!  "






Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Apr 20th, 2016 at 5:13pm
He's hardly going to say "its fucking shite" or "its the same old crap",  in fairness

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Apr 20th, 2016 at 9:20pm

Gazza wrote on Apr 20th, 2016 at 5:13pm:
He's hardly going to say "its fucking shite" or "its the same old crap",  in fairness



___________________________


However and as well ....he could of simply said it was great stuff or classic Stones or that it was fabulous ...  ya-da-ya-da ... and left it at that.. ...

It goes both ways.

Here is my thing.. as I mentioned initially ... I am not 110% convinced this actually took place. I mean .. where did they Talk to Mick and why would Mick disclose his opinion this early in that it is different from the norm as the article states?

All this seems unlike Jagger to say anything at this early stage.. very... very unlike him. I hope the article is legit.. BUT to use Gazza's line.. in fairness... there is every bit of chance this interview never took place ( I mean it's bang showbiz or whatever lol ... Its not the USA today ...or RollingStone.com reporting it ..or even the Daily Mirror for that matter .. ...).

>> Just sayin. I certainly wanted to share this with all of you BUT just as well .. I am taking this particular piece with a huge grain of salt here as well.


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by job on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 3:52pm
There has been ZERO legit media coverage of this.  Some or all of it is probably BS.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Freya Gin on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 4:06pm

job wrote on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 3:52pm:
There has been ZERO legit media coverage of this.  Some or all of it is probably BS.


You're not the only one who has noticed this.

Funny, I originally came to RO looking for news on this album. Almost half a year later and I still don't know anything about it!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 4:23pm

job wrote on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 3:52pm:
There has been ZERO legit media coverage of this.  Some or all of it is probably BS.



and then depression set in...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 6:04pm

job wrote on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 3:52pm:
There has been ZERO legit media coverage of this.  Some or all of it is probably BS.



___________________________________

Here is what we know for certain...

1. There is a brand new studio album in the works

2. They first got together to officially work on it in December of last year.

3. They cut a few new songs in December and several blues covers (none of the blues covers are certain to make it to the album).


_____________________________________

Strong evidence:

- They are working on it on and off as we speak ..most likely in London (per Keith)
- It is to be released later this year
- Release time frame is this fall.. most likely October / November.

_____________________________________

Pure speculation:

It is an album consisting of mostly Blues covers
The Producer? (nobody knows who it is).

That is where we are. It's the straight dope -


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 12:05am

*As well disregard B. Fowlers recent blurry, black and white photo of Keith as being taken 'in the studio' recently. Fowler released a color image today that shows Keith with the same clothes, sitting on the floor in the same environment and this time he stated this image was taken in Havana. It was obviously the same location (being in Cuba) as the blurry, black and white image posted six or seven days ago... so the original image was not taken in the studio as was thought by many (including myself).

I just wanted that to be clarified here.


- Ian


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 9:48am

Freya Gin wrote on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 4:06pm:

job wrote on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 3:52pm:
There has been ZERO legit media coverage of this.  Some or all of it is probably BS.


You're not the only one who has noticed this.

Funny, I originally came to RO looking for news on this album. Almost half a year later and I still don't know anything about it!

Neither do the Stones. :wtf2 :will-ya

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 9:50am
It's over.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sirmoonie on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 9:58am
Let's all get some LSD!  And do hits of it.  Quality-ass fishmonk El Ess Dee.  The good stuff, all miked up like a muh.  Where is the microgram symbol?  It's a Greek symbol, often used in scientific and engineering endeavors.

Maybe this is it.  Okay, we can all do 200 µGrams hits of LSD!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 10:00am
simmer down moonskittle.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sirmoonie on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 8:00pm

Some Guy wrote on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 10:00am:
simmer down moonskittle.


The Trappist monks of 'yon Abbey brewed some fire-ass LSD.  Friar Tuck.  Shades of Owsley.

What you SHOULD do, is boycott that barber that fucked up yo' head!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Freya Gin on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 8:19pm

Some Guy wrote on Apr 23rd, 2016 at 9:50am:
It's over.


Psst, Some Guy.... you posted that on the open forum instead of sending it privately to your online lover.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Apr 27th, 2016 at 1:00am

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gypsymofo60 on Apr 27th, 2016 at 10:28pm

patioaintdry wrote on Apr 18th, 2016 at 9:36pm:
Is mid-fall considered mid-October? Early November? Because some people consider Early November to be late fall, even early winter.

I ask because I'm trying to get a good understanding of when the record might come out. Mid fall in Mexico City might be December. Then again, it's always pretty much - with the exception of 3 weeks in August - mid fall to early winter in friggin Belfast. Again, I want to understand when the record is arriving. I cannot event think about Australia and when their mid-fall, er, falls.

Mid fall, what's that? In Ustralya it's Fucking hot, then fucking cold. Up north, it's fucking stifling, then fucking stifling.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Apr 29th, 2016 at 11:23am
any gossip?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Apr 29th, 2016 at 11:58am

Some Guy wrote on Apr 29th, 2016 at 11:23am:
any gossip?


Get yer soap opera stories right here: http://rocksoff.org/cgi-bin/messageboard/YaBB.pl?num=1446409236

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 2nd, 2016 at 8:28pm


Just posted on their Facebook Page for something to come in 'October'... and it's hinted message is not terribly hard to figure out!!

See it here: https://www.facebook.com/therollingstones/videos/10154347479513287/

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on May 2nd, 2016 at 9:14pm

Ian Billen wrote on May 2nd, 2016 at 8:28pm:
Just posted on their Facebook Page for something to come in 'October'... and it's hinted message is not terribly hard to figure out!!

See it here: https://www.facebook.com/therollingstones/videos/10154347479513287/



Ian, talk to me like I'm a three year old.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 2nd, 2016 at 9:44pm

Some Guy wrote on May 2nd, 2016 at 9:14pm:

Ian Billen wrote on May 2nd, 2016 at 8:28pm:
Just posted on their Facebook Page for something to come in 'October'... and it's hinted message is not terribly hard to figure out!!

See it here: https://www.facebook.com/therollingstones/videos/10154347479513287/



Ian, talk to me like I'm a three year old.



____________________________________


If you are a good little Nanker .. you'll get a brand new Stones studio album in October.. BUT .. ONLY if you behave!! ( :) ) . Btw.. this will be exciting ...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on May 3rd, 2016 at 6:13am
Ian, the video is for the mega concert. Neil Young, The Who, Paul, etc. Check out their social media pages for similar videos.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on May 3rd, 2016 at 9:39am

Ian Billen wrote on May 2nd, 2016 at 9:44pm:

Some Guy wrote on May 2nd, 2016 at 9:14pm:

Ian Billen wrote on May 2nd, 2016 at 8:28pm:
Just posted on their Facebook Page for something to come in 'October'... and it's hinted message is not terribly hard to figure out!!

See it here: https://www.facebook.com/therollingstones/videos/10154347479513287/



Ian, talk to me like I'm a three year old.



____________________________________


If you are a good little Nanker .. you'll get a brand new Stones studio album in October.. BUT .. ONLY if you behave!! ( :) ) . Btw.. this will be exciting ...



Ian, we got Coachella'd.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on May 3rd, 2016 at 12:19pm

Steel Wheels wrote on May 3rd, 2016 at 6:13am:
Ian, the video is for the mega concert. Neil Young, The Who, Paul, etc. Check out their social media pages for similar videos.


But Ian said it was an announcement of a new Stones album. Or did he just pull that info out of his ass?
:pukey :kissmyass

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 3rd, 2016 at 3:15pm


Of course the video was made for Coachella...but is the 'way' it is done that should tell you something as well (Lol). I saw The Whos one for October as well  .. BUT the way the Stones did their vid is a <hint> ... with a record playing as in their is a new album on the way too. The way the video was done doesn't take Sherlock Holmes reincarnated to put the double meaning together yo .. .. .... Lol


As well .. BV who runs iorr.org who is right much of the time also stated that the Stones release time is for the album is October. He said that is not speculation and that it is verified. He also described the video and a hint at the release of a new record just as well as the Coachella event.. though he said he already understood the release date for October .. (he is not right '100%' of the time.. but very often he is .. You can argue it out with him if you like. He has been spot on before when it comes to album info that nobody had a clue about previously).

Ian



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on May 4th, 2016 at 8:35am
When do we sticky this?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 4th, 2016 at 2:37pm

Some Guy wrote on May 4th, 2016 at 8:35am:
When do we sticky this?



_____________________________


Do you mean you haven't already!?    ... (ha :) )

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on May 5th, 2016 at 8:56am

Some Guy wrote on May 4th, 2016 at 8:35am:
When do we sticky this?

I don't know about sticky. But I am sick of this. Does that count? :pukey

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 5th, 2016 at 9:23am


Hopefully Gazza will have a little inside info soon (as he does from time to time..) I can feel it. We are waiting Gazz ... .....


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on May 7th, 2016 at 7:32pm
Ian, what the fuck is this?

https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 8th, 2016 at 4:34pm

Some Guy wrote on May 7th, 2016 at 7:32pm:
Ian, what the fuck is this?

https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM



______________________________________


They are experimenting .. ( :D ) bahahaha  Naaaa I'm kidding, naturally.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 8th, 2016 at 4:37pm

A Small UPDATE: (5- 08 -16)

Mick said in a Sirius XM interview very very recently (last few days) that they have done some studio work on an album and will do more .. yet he quickly steered the conversation back to Coachella.

Keith in an interview that same day says they are headed back into the studio next month. (< ... no idea why? .. I thought it was all in the can there, Keef .. :D )

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on May 9th, 2016 at 4:59am
It's all fairly-ish obvious now that they need to groove it up fairly deliriously, a la Hoot Stiff Negrita  but beyond; on top of and as well as the nostalgic ol' Bluesy-ing, shirlley? If they would only pull their firm funk fingers out. There is no reason that they shouldn't semi-invent a new-ish funky-ish guitar  paradigm and groove-'geist for the '16 trouser-generation.


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 9th, 2016 at 1:20pm

They are keeping this very much on the down low.. but rest assure.. there is a new studio album in the works and they are taking it seriously. How do I know..?  >> (lol .. well isn't that obvious at this point).


Ian


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by job on May 9th, 2016 at 4:01pm
Gotta admit, I have extremely low expectations for this, especially after hearing that they cut 11 blues covers.  I don't like the Stones for blues covers...I like them for their own version and interpretation of the blues in original compositions.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on May 9th, 2016 at 4:21pm
The blues covers were great back in 1965 when I was 13 and didn't know the source. Now I go to the source. Just be The Stones FFS and don't try and be the latest thing.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 9th, 2016 at 6:47pm

Folks .. this 'album of blues covers' was all hear-say. Ronnie simply said they recorded a bunch of old blues songs...(along with some new Rolling Stones cuts)  and that the stuff was sounding great. Nothing more.

The December session was simply to get their feet planted and start things rolling studio wise and as a.... 'start'... on working on an album .. that's all it was. It was almost a warm up .. and to work on a hand full of demos brought in ...but they got a healthy dose of new material out of the session just as well. Seems as if they are taking this slow .. and not rushing anything this time (thankfully). They are working on this album in segments  .. that's all. The blues covers was just in warming up and starting things off in there.. that's all.


I am certain we are not getting an album of mostly blues covers. It is a new Rolling Stones album. 





Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Freya Gin on May 9th, 2016 at 9:13pm
Hmm. I guess I like their blues covers pretty well but I must agree that they do their own original blues songs better. Back of My Hand is a perfect example; it's one of my all-time favorite songs.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on May 12th, 2016 at 10:46pm
One can only imagine

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on May 12th, 2016 at 10:47pm
the delirious pleasures

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on May 12th, 2016 at 10:47pm
they have in store

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by job on May 13th, 2016 at 12:09pm
I can't wait for "Dance Pt. 3: Dream Warriors"

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by job on May 13th, 2016 at 12:14pm

WaiteringOnAFiend wrote on May 12th, 2016 at 10:47pm:
they have in store


In store??  You know damn well there are no record stores anymore!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 14th, 2016 at 7:23pm
UPDATE:

Don Was said they did in fact do a full album of total blues last December (before they did new songs for another / brand new RS studio album). Along with The album of total blues .... There's material for a brand new Rolling Stones album which could be / seems to be on the way as well and they are trying to figure out how to handle that (meaning will it be TWO (?) separate releases .. or ONE (?) release together and how to put it out etc.).

Keith first suggested they do a blues cover.. to loosen up and get their bearings. It was recorded and it was so good (REALLY good according to who was there) they just kept decided to keep going and recorded many more blues numbers over the next two days (a full albums worth) before getting into their brand new stuff for work on a New Stones studio album.

None of the first blues segment was planned. They are still working on their brand new stuff (not the blues one). They have new songs.. for an album or a combination but the blues album is done (which is what Keith meant by 'thats in the can' .. I guess he was sort of correct). They still are working and planning on finishing their new stuff and trying to see how this goes with the blues album and their new album or the making of their new album. 

Interview Here with Don Was: Listen at 01:54 http://ondemand.rrr.org.au/player/128/201604300900

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on May 15th, 2016 at 12:08am
What is the correct time-code, or page link, for that, I.B.?  Let's not play silly buggers.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on May 15th, 2016 at 7:48am

thanks Ian for keeping it real.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 15th, 2016 at 9:23am

WaiteringOnAFiend wrote on May 15th, 2016 at 12:08am:
What is the correct time-code, or page link, for that, I.B.?  Let's not play silly buggers.


______________________________

01:54 (1 hour and 54 minutes in).

http://ondemand.rrr.org.au/player/128/201604300900


Sounds promising

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on May 15th, 2016 at 12:09pm

Ian Billen wrote on May 9th, 2016 at 6:47pm:
I am certain we are not getting an album of mostly blues covers. It is a new Rolling Stones album. 


You're going to get both and like it!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 15th, 2016 at 5:22pm

Gazza wrote on May 15th, 2016 at 12:09pm:

Ian Billen wrote on May 9th, 2016 at 6:47pm:
I am certain we are not getting an album of mostly blues covers. It is a new Rolling Stones album. 


You're going to get both and like it!



__________________________________


Well I know...  and I certainly won't! (and btw... neither better ANY of you f**rs here!!! :)  )

>> .. I mean they complain The Stones need to or should of done an all blues album = (done ... )


>> .. They say the Stones are finished and sadly would never do another studio album = (well bite your tongue ... <<with some pun there ... because they are working on it).


*I better not hear one word of bitching from here out! :D


- Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on May 15th, 2016 at 6:14pm
Best of both worlds if they release both but it makes far more sense - artistically and commercially - to make them separate releases and not as a double with no cohesive connection

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 16th, 2016 at 1:19am

Gazza wrote on May 15th, 2016 at 6:14pm:
Best of both worlds if they release both but it makes far more sense - artistically and commercially - to make them separate releases and not as a double with no cohesive connection



__________________________________________


Yes... best of both worlds... Here we are in 2016 and The Stones are planning two things especially nice for us... As well as a tour. What more could we ask for? Lol

I am not sure how they are gonna put it together either... or separate it? I want a new studio album first. However I still want that blues treat ... I can wait 6 or 8 months after the new studio album if need be.

If they decide to incorporate it together (some how?) I guess I will just have to wait and see how that makes sense?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on May 16th, 2016 at 6:17pm
A tour means nothing to me personally as they haven't played the UK since 2013 and probably wont do for at least another year. Paying hundreds of quid for the same stadium/festival show again isn't anywhere near the top of my concert agenda.

New music or properly done archive releases are the Stones activity that are more likely to butter my parsnips these days.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by andrews27 on May 16th, 2016 at 7:32pm

Gazza wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:17pm:
A tour means nothing to me personally as they haven't played the UK since 2013 and probably wont do for at least another year. Paying hundreds of quid for the same stadium/festival show again isn't anywhere near the top of my concert agenda.


If they could stay as on-top-of-it as they were in the US in 2015, I would tell you it would be worth the layout.  But...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on May 16th, 2016 at 7:44pm

Gazza wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:17pm:
A tour means nothing to me personally as they haven't played the UK since 2013 and probably wont do for at least another year. Paying hundreds of quid for the same stadium/festival show again isn't anywhere near the top of my concert agenda.


What if they played Belfast ?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on May 16th, 2016 at 8:49pm

andrews27 wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 7:32pm:

Gazza wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:17pm:
A tour means nothing to me personally as they haven't played the UK since 2013 and probably wont do for at least another year. Paying hundreds of quid for the same stadium/festival show again isn't anywhere near the top of my concert agenda.


If they could stay as on-top-of-it as they were in the US in 2015, I would tell you it would be worth the layout.  But...


Saw them in Berlin in 2014 in a wonderful outdoor arena. The show was great as was the location. It was a nice way to experience my 50th show. If that's a way of closing the book I don't mind. It's been a great run.  But I'm done with large stadiums to see the same show multiple times - if the option is to pay a normal price to sit 60-80 yards away or pay a fortune to get close, I'd take the third option and not bother.




Edith Grove wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 7:44pm:

Gazza wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:17pm:
A tour means nothing to me personally as they haven't played the UK since 2013 and probably wont do for at least another year. Paying hundreds of quid for the same stadium/festival show again isn't anywhere near the top of my concert agenda.


What if they played Belfast ?


But they wont. Apart from two remote festival dates, they havent played any UK show outside London since 2006.

I didnt say I wouldnt go see them. I'm at the stage where I'd LIKE to but don't absolutely feel that I NEED to. 50 shows is way more than I ever could have expected and I'm grateful for that. If it all ended tomorrow, naturally I'd be sad but I wouldnt have any regrets about having missed anything. I consider myself pretty well fulfilled.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on May 17th, 2016 at 8:41am
THEY NEED TO BRING THEIR A GAME!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by job on May 17th, 2016 at 10:22am

Some Guy wrote on May 17th, 2016 at 8:41am:
THEY NEED TO BRING THEIR A GAME!


Their B game is pretty damn good too.  It certainly beats the hell out of anyone else's A game.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 17th, 2016 at 1:29pm

Gazza wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:17pm:
A tour means nothing to me personally as they haven't played the UK since 2013 and probably wont do for at least another year. Paying hundreds of quid for the same stadium/festival show again isn't anywhere near the top of my concert agenda.

New music or properly done archive releases are the Stones activity that are more likely to butter my parsnips these days.



________________________________________



...You'll get BOTH .. and you'll like it ..

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on May 17th, 2016 at 3:41pm
well I know I'm getting a long-desired archive release in a couple of weeks that I'm very pleased about, so that's the first half of 2016 nicely taken care of...!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on May 18th, 2016 at 9:56am
Can we do it?
Will we whiff?
Are we still The Greatest?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on May 18th, 2016 at 11:57am

Some Guy wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 9:56am:
Can we do it?
Will we whiff?
Are we still The Greatest?



________________________________


Indeed there seems to be a mar on their legacy as a possibility.

In the old days if they put out a mediocre album (which was rare) it was just disappointing .. and there were possibly brighter days ahead for them. Right now... there may be no more brighter days ahead studio wise.. this is the end cap (potentially). This album is going to either further affirm their credibility as a working act in their late years or tarnish it (potentially badly).

Depends on things.. It's on the line here.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on May 18th, 2016 at 4:12pm
no more pussy footing around damn it, it's twenty 16!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jun 1st, 2016 at 11:50pm

Some Guy wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 4:12pm:
no more pussy footing around damn it, it's twenty 16!




_______________________________


I know right .. Me and Gazza were just talking about this.. It's like ... guys... Uh .. People are expecting an album in the fall after all this talk .. meaning friggin THIS fall .. I SURE hope you guys are on it?? smh Lol

Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jun 1st, 2016 at 11:53pm


What was already reported. However a bit of a confirmation (just keep in mind it is .. 'The Sun'...) and as well a tad more info about Eric Clapton's appearance with them in their new stuff.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/7188664/Rolling-Stones-to-team-up-with-Eric-Clapton-on-next-album.html


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Marie on Jun 2nd, 2016 at 1:38pm
http://ultimateclassicrock.com/eric-clapton-rolling-stones-album/

http://www.nme.com/news/the-rolling-stones/93913

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 2nd, 2016 at 4:38pm
I don't think I've ever been this happy.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 3rd, 2016 at 8:29am
Stones / Clapton Collab:

http://www.odt.co.nz/entertainment/music/385576/rolling-stones-collaborate-clapton


The Rolling Stones have collaborated with Eric Clapton.

The 'Paint It Black' hitmakers - comprised of Sir Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Charlie Watts and Ronnie Wood - have recorded two new tracks with the legendary blues singer for their forthcoming album after he gatecrashed their studio time in Chiswick, West London, recently.

A source told The Sun newspaper: "Eric was in the next studio along so he came in to say hello. They ended up jamming and recorded two songs. [Producer] Don [Was] reckons it's the best thing he has done with the Stones."

This isn't the first time Clapton (71) has worked with the group as he previously joined them on stage in 2012 for their second '50 & Counting' concert at London's O2 Arena.

An unheard version of the Rolling Stones' track 'Brown Sugar' also emerged last year featuring the vocals of Clapton.

However, it's believed this is the first time they have all joined forces in the studio and recorded a new song.

Meanwhile, the Rolling Stones' new album, which is yet to be given a name, will be their first in over a decade.

But, despite the fact it hasn't been dropped yet, it's believed the band are already starting work on their next studio LP as they are enjoying working on new content so much.

An insider explained: "They have decided to go back in the studio this month because they are enjoying it so much."

Meanwhile, the band may have a combined age of 286, but they certainly aren't showing any signs of slowing down following success of their gig in Cuba - their biggest concert to date - in April.

Keith previously said: "We're planning some gigs later on this year. I take each tour as it comes and at the moment I'm still shaking Cuba off me."
Bang Showbiz

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jun 3rd, 2016 at 1:45pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Jun 3rd, 2016 at 8:29am:
Stones / Clapton Collab:

http://www.odt.co.nz/entertainment/music/385576/rolling-stones-collaborate-clapton


The Rolling Stones have collaborated with Eric Clapton.

The 'Paint It Black' hitmakers - comprised of Sir Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Charlie Watts and Ronnie Wood - have recorded two new tracks with the legendary blues singer for their forthcoming album after he gatecrashed their studio time in Chiswick, West London, recently.

A source told The Sun newspaper: "Eric was in the next studio along so he came in to say hello. They ended up jamming and recorded two songs. [Producer] Don [Was] reckons it's the best thing he has done with the Stones."

This isn't the first time Clapton (71) has worked with the group as he previously joined them on stage in 2012 for their second '50 & Counting' concert at London's O2 Arena.

An unheard version of the Rolling Stones' track 'Brown Sugar' also emerged last year featuring the vocals of Clapton.

However, it's believed this is the first time they have all joined forces in the studio and recorded a new song.

Meanwhile, the Rolling Stones' new album, which is yet to be given a name, will be their first in over a decade.

But, despite the fact it hasn't been dropped yet, it's believed the band are already starting work on their next studio LP as they are enjoying working on new content so much.

An insider explained: "They have decided to go back in the studio this month because they are enjoying it so much."

Meanwhile, the band may have a combined age of 286, but they certainly aren't showing any signs of slowing down following success of their gig in Cuba - their biggest concert to date - in April.

Keith previously said: "We're planning some gigs later on this year. I take each tour as it comes and at the moment I'm still shaking Cuba off me."
Bang Showbiz

Now we're getting somewhere.  :keithpunky :willya

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 3rd, 2016 at 3:32pm
If scl is getting excited so am I.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:31am


I guess Keith is back to playing as lil Bass in the studio as per his Twitter tonight (shows a pic of him in there).

As well .. Sheryl Crow was with him (or them I'm guessing?) in there.. as per her FB Page. She's got a pic of them two together recently in the studio. I wonder what she was doing with him (or them) in there? Hmmmm?


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Jun 8th, 2016 at 7:12am

Ian Billen wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:31am:
I guess Keith is back to playing as lil Bass in the studio as per his Twitter tonight (shows a pic of him in there).

As well .. Sheryl Crow was with him (or them I'm guessing?) in there.. as per her FB Page. She's got a pic of them two together recently in the studio. I wonder what she was doing with him (or them) in there? Hmmmm?


Sheryl could have been:
1. Looking for Clapton
2. Hired as a fluffer
3. Paid to keep Kid Rock out
4. Attempting to stay relevant

take your pick....

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 8th, 2016 at 7:54am
my sources tell me this will be their best album since Exile.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by lavendar on Jun 8th, 2016 at 8:55am
N I C E !

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 8th, 2016 at 9:26am
Keith in studio with Sheryl Crow where he is working on her new album.


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:27pm
WTF?

I'd never have guessed in a thousand years that was Sheryl.

What happened? Was she in a fire?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:32pm

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:27pm:
WTF?

I'd never have guessed in a thousand years that was Sheryl.

What happened? Was she in a fire?




Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:37pm

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:27pm:
WTF?

I'd never have guessed in a thousand years that was Sheryl.

What happened? Was she in a fire?

What about Keith's tongue? It's Gene Simmonsesque. :paristhong :waka-jawaka

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 8th, 2016 at 4:17pm
for my new song I want a cross between Highwire and Plundered!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 10th, 2016 at 8:12am
These recent photos that we have been seeing of Keith in studio- Do we really know if it is for The new Stones album? Where's Mick??

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 10th, 2016 at 8:54am

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:27pm:
WTF?

I'd never have guessed in a thousand years that was Sheryl.

What happened? Was she in a fire?



Right there with you Gazza...make it a thousand and 1 years for me...could it be the collegian lips and distorted selfie closeup?


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Jun 10th, 2016 at 12:02pm

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:27pm:
WTF?

I'd never have guessed in a thousand years that was Sheryl.

What happened? Was she in a fire?


Is she auditioning to play Stiflers Mom? Poor gal...not often a woman in a pic with Keith is the least attractive.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Joey on Jun 10th, 2016 at 2:12pm

Gazza wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 2:27pm:
WTF?

I'd never have guessed in a thousand years that was Sheryl.

What happened? Was she in a fire?








Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Maxmeister on Jun 10th, 2016 at 5:07pm

Some Guy wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 7:54am:
my sources tell me this will be their best album since Exile.


I would find new sources asap.

Rick

"There's bombers in my bedroom..... and it's giving me the shits. J/ R

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by RevLouCifer on Jun 11th, 2016 at 3:58am
My first post Stoners, so be kind.  To start, Keef is god and should do more Expensive Wino's rather than a new Stones Album.  Don't get mne wrong, I love me some old Stones, pretty much Ssome Girls was their last good album in my book, I agree with the tarnishing comments stated and that Super Bowl fiasco was hard on my soul, hurt to watch.  Would love to hear even an "Unplugged" new disc by them.  Hard to have high expectations for whats coming, but would love to be floored by a ripping Exile'ish testament to their legacy.  I have always answered "The Stones" to the age old debate, Stones or Beatles, as I have The Killer  or The King.  Always like the grittier side of things I guess.  I look forward to bouncing around and seeing whats here, never joined these boards previously, I guess I more of a voyeur.  But, dont get em wrong, my collection is vast and deep and focused pre some girls.  I think I have a year by year collection of everything they did, including live, it's in a vault, deep deep in the ground somewhere nears Brians resting spot, all I can say. Looking forward to reading the boards on Micks solo stuff vs Keefs as well.  Time to rip this joint

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Jun 11th, 2016 at 6:32am
RevLou ?



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BONOISLOVE on Jun 11th, 2016 at 2:38pm
Next time I watch another 'selfie' I will abort dead children.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Jun 11th, 2016 at 3:57pm

Maxmeister wrote on Jun 10th, 2016 at 5:07pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 7:54am:
my sources tell me this will be their best album since Exile.


I would find new sources asap.

Rick

"There's bombers in my bedroom..... and it's giving me the shits. J/ R


Though, you have to admit Rick...it has a good chance of being the best new stuff released in the last 20 years...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by RevLouCifer on Jun 11th, 2016 at 5:02pm
Yes, that was certainly some of my better work.  Hell, we do go way back, who do you think named me Keef, I mean named Kieth Keef.
Ooops, this is in response to Edith Grove. a few back

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Maxmeister on Jun 11th, 2016 at 5:07pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Jun 11th, 2016 at 3:57pm:

Maxmeister wrote on Jun 10th, 2016 at 5:07pm:
[quote author=5965676F554D7F730A0 link=1461014064/86#86 date=1465390445]my sources tell me this will be their best album since Exile.


I would find new sources asap.

Rick



Though, you have to admit Rick...it has a good chance of being the best new stuff released in the last 20 years...


Anything is possible. A release that is better than ABB won't take that much. Besting Babylon is a bit tougher.
If we get a release that includes blues covers, there might not be that many new tracks unless the rumor I heard about a double album is true.
The fact that we are getting anything new at the 55 year point and they are still touring is beyond amazing.

Rick

"Lose your dreams and you will lose your mind." J/R

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 12th, 2016 at 9:59am
I am not putting a lot of faith in a new album release this fall. I really don't have a fuck to give.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Jun 12th, 2016 at 5:39pm
Seems to be some studio work in or around London imminent going by some social media updates by Pierre Beauport and Rose Leavell.

Mick was in France yesterday with his son Lucas and Matt Clifford making sure he jinxed England in yet another international football tournament.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BILL PERKS on Jun 12th, 2016 at 9:33pm

Some Guy wrote on Jun 12th, 2016 at 9:59am:
I am not putting a lot of faith in a new album release this fall. I really don't have a fuck to give.

Settle down, Beavis.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 13th, 2016 at 7:55am

BILL PERKS wrote on Jun 12th, 2016 at 9:33pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jun 12th, 2016 at 9:59am:
I am not putting a lot of faith in a new album release this fall. I really don't have a fuck to give.

Settle down, Beavis.



duly noted...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by job on Jun 13th, 2016 at 9:59am

Maxmeister wrote on Jun 11th, 2016 at 5:07pm:
A release that is better than ABB won't take that much. Besting Babylon is a bit tougher.


Hahahahahahahaha!  Good one!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 13th, 2016 at 10:00am

job wrote on Jun 13th, 2016 at 9:59am:

Maxmeister wrote on Jun 11th, 2016 at 5:07pm:
A release that is better than ABB won't take that much. Besting Babylon is a bit tougher.


Hahahahahahahaha!  Good one!


we shouldn't be afraid to aim higher.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Joey on Jun 13th, 2016 at 1:15pm

Gazza wrote on Jun 12th, 2016 at 5:39pm:
Matt Clifford making sure he jinxed England in yet another international football tournament.





!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by job on Jun 13th, 2016 at 4:07pm

Some Guy wrote on Jun 13th, 2016 at 10:00am:

job wrote on Jun 13th, 2016 at 9:59am:

Maxmeister wrote on Jun 11th, 2016 at 5:07pm:
A release that is better than ABB won't take that much. Besting Babylon is a bit tougher.


Hahahahahahahaha!  Good one!


we shouldn't be afraid to aim higher.


Absolutely we should.  I just thought it was a joke since the implication was that B2B was better than ABB.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 13th, 2016 at 4:20pm
I ain't falling for the banana in the tailpipe.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Jun 24th, 2016 at 11:51am
The Stones are all in London. I'd imagine some studio work must be on the cards although I've also heard they're doing some media/promotional stuff (what for, I dont know)

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Maxmeister on Jun 24th, 2016 at 10:26pm

Gazza wrote on Jun 24th, 2016 at 11:51am:
The Stones are all in London. I'd imagine some studio work must be on the cards although I've also heard they're doing some media/promotional stuff (what for, I dont know)


Patiently waiting for an Ian Billen update.

Rick

Drink responsibly.....and often.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on Jun 25th, 2016 at 1:46am
Ian - Any nudes? Is it the complete Chiswick Physic?  The full Hounslow Hankies?
Have they gone off - like fire crackers - 12 or 13 hours a day with new grooves?


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jun 25th, 2016 at 7:43am
This is very important, we are gonna need a Thriller.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jun 26th, 2016 at 5:26pm

They went back in the studio the 14th (June). They plan on spending a solid 10 days or so on finishing the recording part in this last segment and then they will over dub and mix it right afterward. 

Nobody knows what the new material is like .... or what to make of the blues stuff versus what they have brand new etc. etc.

There is a report that there is to be a song some where in the mix by Little Walter ...


That's all I got (< which I gathered by reading).


- Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jun 27th, 2016 at 5:09pm

WaiteringOnAFiend wrote on Jun 25th, 2016 at 1:46am:
Ian - Any nudes? Is it the complete Chiswick Physic?  The full Hounslow Hankies?
Have they gone off - like fire crackers - 12 or 13 hours a day with new grooves?




________________________________


waitingonafriend .. most here said all this would never happen.... Remember? I was one of the very few that said they would eventually get back into the studio .. It wasn't wishful thinking.. or being optimistic ... It was simply realizing that they still want to create new music (SOONer or Later ... In this case it was MUCH later ha-ha) and act as a fully functioning act.


Now it's happening and I am simply involved in wanting to know or find out or discuss things.

After all ... isn't that what this message board is about? .. (discussing the new Rolling Stones plans?). I don't know about ya-all but that's why I signed up .. .. .....

- Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Mr. Yeats on Jun 27th, 2016 at 5:54pm
I just heard that Clapton has been recording with the lads. Is this true? (Christ, I hope not. Maybe a track or two, but...).

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Jun 28th, 2016 at 7:14am

Mr. Yeats wrote on Jun 27th, 2016 at 5:54pm:
I just heard that Clapton has been recording with the lads. Is this true? (Christ, I hope not. Maybe a track or two, but...).


It was first reported about three weeks ago and I don't recall hearing any denial of it.

I'm looking forward to hearing some more Clapton with the Stones.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jun 28th, 2016 at 7:29am

Mr. Yeats wrote on Jun 27th, 2016 at 5:54pm:
I just heard that Clapton has been recording with the lads. Is this true? (Christ, I hope not. Maybe a track or two, but...).

http://ultimateclassicrock.com/eric-clapton-rolling-stones-album/

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 5:07pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.



__________________________________________


Some Guy comes through for us!! .. right from The man, the myth and the legend!


Thanks for reporting.. I have but two questions if you have any further honest insight to said material. 

A. What is the new material like? (if ya know.. meaning is it different.. or just typical Stones... anything at all on that?).

B. When ya say 'very good' does that mean 'VERY' good .. or are you meaning they meant just simply typically good stuff?


We await Mate... thx again

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 5:19pm

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 5:07pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.



__________________________________________


Some Guy comes through for us!! .. right from The man, the myth and the legend!

Thanks for reporting.. I have but two questions if you have any further honest insight to said material. 

A. What is the new material like? (if ya know.. meaning is it different.. or just typical Stones... anything at all on that?).

B. When ya say 'very good' does that mean 'VERY' good .. or are you meaning just simply typically good stuff?


We await Mate... thx again


I was at a party last night where I met a radio guy and he seemed to know what he was talking about. He didn't mention the sound or titles. Be advised he seemed to have the sniffles. He was not very personable and he seemed full of his self. I could whoop his ass though.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 6:08pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 5:07pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.



__________________________________________


Some Guy comes through for us!! .. right from The man, the myth and the legend!

Thanks for reporting.. I have but two questions if you have any further honest insight to said material. 

A. What is the new material like? (if ya know.. meaning is it different.. or just typical Stones... anything at all on that?).

B. When ya say 'very good' does that mean 'VERY' good .. or are you meaning just simply typically good stuff?


We await Mate... thx again


I was at a party last night where I met a radio guy and he seemed to know what he was talking about. He didn't mention the sound or titles. Be advised he seemed to have the sniffles. He was not very personable and he seemed full of his self. I could whoop his ass though.




______________________________


Ahhhhh I see. Maybe you should of just whooped his ass ...  :D  .. (seems like he needs it a bit :D ).


How credible / believable is / was the guy and his story though? ... (in your opinion). Remember.. it seems they have been doing most of their recording from all the way across the pond this time .. in London.


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 11:05pm
Ian, I think we might have something here. I was lit at the time.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 11:16pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 11:05pm:
Ian, I think we might have something here. I was lit at the time.



________________________________

I can tell ya one thing... this new release certainly is intriguing.

For one reason is that they sort of seem to be working on a sort of 'different' type of product this time ...

As well .. due to the fact that this release could very well be their last.. considering their age... and not to mention consistency in studio releases (or lack of lately lol) . It has been the easily longest (by far) stretch w/o a studio album by them ...... and due to that fact many said they were finished studio wise as far as albums go ... so with all of the above being all that said... this album actually means a lot ..and people are especially curious here in this what could very well be their final full studio release chapter.

This certainly has got many peoples attention. However they are keeping this puppy (whatever that puppy may be).. VERY under wraps this time. Even more so than usual.


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 11:21pm
Get ready.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 3rd, 2016 at 9:59pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 11:21pm:
Get ready.



__________________________________


I've 'been' ready .. .. .... :D

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 9th, 2016 at 12:04pm
I'm thinking it's a cross between Some Girls and Tattoo You. There are rumored to be some very controversial songs on this album. We're back babies!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:03pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 9th, 2016 at 12:04pm:
There are rumored to be some very controversial songs on this album


Sweet Neoexit?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:11pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


:loloncemore

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Egon on Jul 11th, 2016 at 8:34am
I too think this is going to be a different kind of product...

like a 2nd exile...

but different.

I hope it will it have one or two keef balades
gotta have some of those.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58am

Gazza wrote on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


:loloncemore



_________________________________



I don't think he or she is meaning they are going to hit number one on the Billboard lol ... I think what this means is that there are three rock radio ready / easily accessible tunes ..for the general public to appreciate to promote or push ....

Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 12th, 2016 at 2:37pm

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58am:

Gazza wrote on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


:loloncemore



_________________________________



I don't think he or she is meaning they are going to hit number one on the Billboard lol ... I think what this means is that there are three rock radio ready / easily accessible tunes ..for the general public to appreciate to promote or push ....

Ian


Or Some Guy is full of crap...lol....He just runs into a guy in an Atlanta bar that's heard the album. Hmmmmm sounds fishy to me and perhaps SG is playing us?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 13th, 2016 at 5:20am

gimmekeef wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 2:37pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58am:

Gazza wrote on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


:loloncemore



_________________________________



I don't think he or she is meaning they are going to hit number one on the Billboard lol ... I think what this means is that there are three rock radio ready / easily accessible tunes ..for the general public to appreciate to promote or push ....

Ian


Or Some Guy is full of crap...lol....He just runs into a guy in an Atlanta bar that's heard the album. Hmmmmm sounds fishy to me and perhaps SG is playing us?




________________________________



Ahhh come on now... can you cut Some Guy a break ... will ya? Yeeeesh. We need more people like him if ya ask me.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:32am

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 5:20am:

gimmekeef wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 2:37pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58am:

Gazza wrote on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


:loloncemore



_________________________________



I don't think he or she is meaning they are going to hit number one on the Billboard lol ... I think what this means is that there are three rock radio ready / easily accessible tunes ..for the general public to appreciate to promote or push ....

Ian


Or Some Guy is full of crap...lol....He just runs into a guy in an Atlanta bar that's heard the album. Hmmmmm sounds fishy to me and perhaps SG is playing us?




________________________________



Ahhh come on now... can you cut Some Guy a break ... will ya? Yeeeesh. We need more people like him if ya ask me.


Hey he is a friend and we both live in the ATL. We have partied I know he is a great guy...but also loves his fun!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:05pm

gimmekeef wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:32am:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 5:20am:

gimmekeef wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 2:37pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58am:

Gazza wrote on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


:loloncemore



_________________________________



I don't think he or she is meaning they are going to hit number one on the Billboard lol ... I think what this means is that there are three rock radio ready / easily accessible tunes ..for the general public to appreciate to promote or push ....

Ian


Or Some Guy is full of crap...lol....He just runs into a guy in an Atlanta bar that's heard the album. Hmmmmm sounds fishy to me and perhaps SG is playing us?




________________________________



Ahhh come on now... can you cut Some Guy a break ... will ya? Yeeeesh. We need more people like him if ya ask me.


Hey he is a friend and we both live in the ATL. We have partied I know he is a great guy...but also loves his fun!



________________________________


Ahhhh now I read ya right ..ha. Was gonna say .. let's not trash him .. Some Guy's my cat. Now I follow ya.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 13th, 2016 at 2:26pm
Dudes, the party was on a movie set in Atlanta. My wife's sister does a lot of movie work. There were movers and shakers there. He was an Exec with Sirius XM. Seemed legit to me.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:01pm
I have never doubted Some Guy and I am not about to start now...

I know people...some are movers...some are shakers...some post on these boards too...

SG offered nothing that any person "in the know" would not say or express...how would it come across if a mover/shaker/celeb came off and said " The new stuff sounds like crap" ?

Though, I would have asked the SXM Exec if a New Stones channel was going to return...I LOVED that channel...but thats just me talking ...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:53pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 2:26pm:
Dudes, the party was on a movie set in Atlanta. My wife's sister does a lot of movie work. There were movers and shakers there. He was an Exec with Sirius XM. Seemed legit to me.


It's all good men...remember when a few folks heard snippets from Don Was car of a song from ABB? And then Voo I think whi had a tape from a listeneing party for ABB? Hope we can have that type of fun again!!! and a better album!!!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 14th, 2016 at 2:23pm

gimmekeef wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:53pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 2:26pm:
Dudes, the party was on a movie set in Atlanta. My wife's sister does a lot of movie work. There were movers and shakers there. He was an Exec with Sirius XM. Seemed legit to me.


It's all good men...remember when a few folks heard snippets from Don Was car of a song from ABB? And then Voo I think whi had a tape from a listeneing party for ABB? Hope we can have that type of fun again!!! and a better album!!!!


If the shit holds true, always remember- we predicted this...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 18th, 2016 at 6:25am
Expect magic.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Egon on Jul 18th, 2016 at 11:02am
and glitter.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:44pm
Has anyone heard anything about Drake and Rihanna being on the album or is that a false rumor?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 18th, 2016 at 6:54pm
link=1461014064/143#143 date=1468841143]Expect magic.[/quote]
Here's to the end of 8 years of bad magic.Never forget.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dSvrZiX2Z0

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 21st, 2016 at 2:03pm

Keith said in an interfivew live within the last two days that The Stones are working on <an album> ... 'as we speak' .. and that recording wise they have done / are working on a couple things with more to do later in the year?


>> Not sure how the hell he means 'later in the year' <if> the album is to come out in the fall ....?? (Not following.. unless he's not telling the complete / real story). It is going to be August, yo -

By the middle of August I thought everything would have to be wrapped (or SHOULD be a wrap).


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Jul 21st, 2016 at 2:27pm
You believe everything you hear ?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 21st, 2016 at 2:40pm

Edith Grove wrote on Jul 21st, 2016 at 2:27pm:
You believe everything you hear ?



_______________________________


No .. but I sure as hell believe (or at least take into account much more) <The Rolling Stones themselves> ... before I believe folks opinions of said items on message boards .. (call me odd that way if ya must lol ... jus sayin)

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 21st, 2016 at 5:37pm
I  was told on GOOD authority that the record is wrapped & ready.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Jul 21st, 2016 at 6:31pm

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58am:

Gazza wrote on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


:loloncemore



_________________________________



I don't think he or she is meaning they are going to hit number one on the Billboard lol ... I think what this means is that there are three rock radio ready / easily accessible tunes ..for the general public to appreciate to promote or push ....

Ian



This is the Rolling Stones you're talking about, not King fucking Crimson. They tend to specialise in uptempo, catchy uncomplicated guitar orientated songs lasting about four minutes. The whole album in theory should be 'rock radio ready'.

Whether radio stations are going to play several new songs by a bunch of 70 somethings in prime time is another matter though. 

Rock n roll is pretty much dead as far as mainstream music goes and as the singles market has been aimed at teenagers for the last 25 years or so, they're not going to be buying singles released by a bunch of geriatric rockers no matter how cool they are or how good their songs are.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Jul 22nd, 2016 at 5:54pm
Keith on the new album and plans to tour Europe next year (including the UK)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-36864725

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BILL PERKS on Jul 22nd, 2016 at 6:53pm
Someone tell Ian to pull up his pants & comment ASAP.

:sad

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 22nd, 2016 at 7:54pm

Gazza wrote on Jul 21st, 2016 at 6:31pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58am:

Gazza wrote on Jul 9th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 2nd, 2016 at 9:24am:
The new stuff has been played for certain people and it is very good. There are at least 3 singles on the album.


:loloncemore



_________________________________



I don't think he or she is meaning they are going to hit number one on the Billboard lol ... I think what this means is that there are three rock radio ready / easily accessible tunes ..for the general public to appreciate to promote or push ....

Ian



This is the Rolling Stones you're talking about, not King fucking Crimson. They tend to specialise in uptempo, catchy uncomplicated guitar orientated songs lasting about four minutes. The whole album in theory should be 'rock radio ready'.

Whether radio stations are going to play several new songs by a bunch of 70 somethings in prime time is another matter though. 

Rock n roll is pretty much dead as far as mainstream music goes and as the singles market has been aimed at teenagers for the last 25 years or so, they're not going to be buying singles released by a bunch of geriatric rockers no matter how cool they are or how good their songs are.




______________________________________


You are missing my point. They will release official singles ... some are ready for that.. some are not.

A Bigger Bang  = Streets of Love .. single friendly .. Back of My Hand - not.

Bridges To Babylon - Anybody Seen My Baby .. single friendly ... How can I stop = not.

Voodoo Lounge... - You got Me Rocking .. single friendly ... able to be released as a single. Moon is Up ... not single ready.


Some songs are meant to be released as singles.. The Stones usually have anywhere from 2-4 per album .. and they usually release them.

It's not a hard concept .. now.. will they reach Billboard top ten anymore like they did in the 60-70-80's ...no.. Will they hit top ten billboard anymore.. well no Lol .. they wont even hit top 40 today .. but on Rock radio and / or the top rock charts they will do well (.. >>>>>>>hopefully).


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Jul 22nd, 2016 at 8:42pm
Sorry...I dont understand...what is "Rock Radio"...I thought there was only the oldies stations they call "classic rock" or Classic vinyl" or such...Are there really Rock stations still left out there?

I just listen to Sirius/XM but for talk/ Stern/ and some music ( mostly dance/disco/electronica/80's First wave dance party mix...)

Are there really FM stations that would play new Stones on steady rotation?

Like someone said earlier...will stations play a new song by a bunch of pensioners?...Hard to tell as that does not fit into any radio format that i can currently think of...maybe I am wrong or just my usual cynical self...not sure on this one...

I am not even sure what it is that the billboard chart charts anymore...the only ones that make sense are the digital download charts...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BONOISLOVE on Jul 22nd, 2016 at 8:44pm
I love you all, and I want to hear the new single. If it's better than God Gave Me All I'm going to toll to my grave.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 23rd, 2016 at 2:16am

Paranoid Android wrote on Jul 22nd, 2016 at 8:42pm:
Sorry...I dont understand...what is "Rock Radio"...I thought there was only the oldies stations they call "classic rock" or Classic vinyl" or such...Are there really Rock stations still left out there?

I just listen to Sirius/XM but for talk/ Stern/ and some music ( mostly dance/disco/electronica/80's First wave dance party mix...)

Are there really FM stations that would play new Stones on steady rotation?

Like someone said earlier...will stations play a new song by a bunch of pensioners?...Hard to tell as that does not fit into any radio format that i can currently think of...maybe I am wrong or just my usual cynical self...not sure on this one...

I am not even sure what it is that the billboard chart charts anymore...the only ones that make sense are the digital download charts...



_____________________________________


There are usually a Rock station or two .. in most populated areas. We have two. One is more classic rock .. another is all kinds of stuff.

They are dwindling though...

There are a multitude of Internet Rock Radio Stations. Some play classics mixed with new rock.

There Are still some Rock Radio Stations out there and many on the Internet. Some play classics mixed with new rock .. It is in what The new Stones would be played.

You are correct in saying.... The better side of it is digital downloads and / or streaming music from Spotify etc. There are definitely still Rock Charts now as well. The Charting is much more separated between music genres and digital downloads are surely factored in.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 23rd, 2016 at 5:38am
We about to be on top and niggaz ain't ready.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 23rd, 2016 at 7:54pm

Some Guy wrote on Jul 23rd, 2016 at 5:38am:
We about to be on top and niggaz ain't ready.




__________________________________


Ikr!! ... 

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Jul 29th, 2016 at 10:59am

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 23rd, 2016 at 7:54pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 23rd, 2016 at 5:38am:
We about to be on top and niggaz ain't ready.




__________________________________


Ikr!! ... 



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Jul 29th, 2016 at 2:23pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Jul 29th, 2016 at 10:59am:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 23rd, 2016 at 7:54pm:

Some Guy wrote on Jul 23rd, 2016 at 5:38am:
We about to be on top and niggaz ain't ready.




__________________________________


Ikr!! ... 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS1cLOIxsQ8

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 29th, 2016 at 6:55pm


Word has it the album is not of blues covers and is new material. Album is basically finished and there is someone who .....has heard some of it. This person recently visited Don Was at Capital Records (in which he is President of Blue Note Records).

She said she spent the night there and he was showing them his office (with all kinds of music memorabilia). She told him she loved The Rolling Stones upon seeing some things on them in his office. Don Was told her that they are coming out with a new album and he could sense her excitement so he let her listen to a song.

She told Don Was she would ...'burn her phone'...(referring to her not being able to replay any of it).... if she could just please hear more / the album.  She was.. well .. let's just say 'over-joyed' .. (<to put it very mildly lol).

He played her what they have. I specifically asked if they were blues covers ..or for a blues covers album or was it a new studio album? She said 'no covers'. I then naturally asked her how it was....

Her answer: "Fantastic"

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:44pm

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 29th, 2016 at 6:55pm:
Word has it the album is not of blues covers and is new material. Album is basically finished and there is someone who .....has heard some of it. This person recently visited Don Was at Capital Records (in which he is President of Blue Note Records).

She said she spent the night there and he was showing them his office (with all kinds of music memorabilia). She told him she loved The Rolling Stones upon seeing some things on them in his office. Don Was told her that they are coming out with a new album and he could sense her excitement so he let her listen to a song.

She told Don Was she would ...'burn her phone'...(referring to her not being able to replay any of it).... if she could just please hear more / the album.  She was.. well .. let's just say 'over-joyed' .. (<to put it very mildly lol).

He played her what they have. I specifically asked if they were blues covers ..or for a blues covers album or was it a new studio album? She said 'no covers'. I then naturally asked her how it was....

Her answer: "Fantastic"



So...  Your source is a random person on Twitter?

Ok then.  :forfucksake

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Jul 31st, 2016 at 9:26am
Good job Ian- you have earned an added vacation day.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by patioaintdry on Jul 31st, 2016 at 12:50pm

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 29th, 2016 at 6:55pm:
Word has it the album is not of blues covers and is new material. Album is basically finished and there is someone who .....has heard some of it. This person recently visited Don Was at Capital Records (in which he is President of Blue Note Records).

She said she spent the night there and he was showing them his office (with all kinds of music memorabilia). She told him she loved The Rolling Stones upon seeing some things on them in his office. Don Was told her that they are coming out with a new album and he could sense her excitement so he let her listen to a song.

She told Don Was she would ...'burn her phone'...(referring to her not being able to replay any of it).... if she could just please hear more / the album.  She was.. well .. let's just say 'over-joyed' .. (<to put it very mildly lol).

He played her what they have. I specifically asked if they were blues covers ..or for a blues covers album or was it a new studio album? She said 'no covers'. I then naturally asked her how it was....

Her answer: "Fantastic"


If she spent the night with Don Was, I believe her judgement is questionable, her definition of fantastic debatable, and recommend she get tested immediately for an STD.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 31st, 2016 at 4:05pm

leonid wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:44pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 29th, 2016 at 6:55pm:
Word has it the album is not of blues covers and is new material. Album is basically finished and there is someone who .....has heard some of it. This person recently visited Don Was at Capital Records (in which he is President of Blue Note Records).

She said she spent the night there and he was showing them his office (with all kinds of music memorabilia). She told him she loved The Rolling Stones upon seeing some things on them in his office. Don Was told her that they are coming out with a new album and he could sense her excitement so he let her listen to a song.

She told Don Was she would ...'burn her phone'...(referring to her not being able to replay any of it).... if she could just please hear more / the album.  She was.. well .. let's just say 'over-joyed' .. (<to put it very mildly lol).

He played her what they have. I specifically asked if they were blues covers ..or for a blues covers album or was it a new studio album? She said 'no covers'. I then naturally asked her how it was....

Her answer: "Fantastic"



So...  Your source is a random person on Twitter?

Ok then.  :forfucksake



_____________________________________



It is not 'my' source...

Possibly I shouldn't have mentioned it at all here?

Either way .. I'm simply relaying something I saw on IORR and then I conversed with the same person a bit about it and her experience  (I wouldn't think she has any reason to lie about it being as it won't go viral etc).


There .. (IORR) folks happen to be much more obliged to talk about said album and much more open to opinions (mine.. and other peoples) ... with less negativity and personal jabs.

After all .. it is a 'RS message board' -

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Jul 31st, 2016 at 5:24pm

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 4:05pm:

leonid wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:44pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 29th, 2016 at 6:55pm:
Word has it the album is not of blues covers and is new material. Album is basically finished and there is someone who .....has heard some of it. This person recently visited Don Was at Capital Records (in which he is President of Blue Note Records).

She said she spent the night there and he was showing them his office (with all kinds of music memorabilia). She told him she loved The Rolling Stones upon seeing some things on them in his office. Don Was told her that they are coming out with a new album and he could sense her excitement so he let her listen to a song.

She told Don Was she would ...'burn her phone'...(referring to her not being able to replay any of it).... if she could just please hear more / the album.  She was.. well .. let's just say 'over-joyed' .. (<to put it very mildly lol).

He played her what they have. I specifically asked if they were blues covers ..or for a blues covers album or was it a new studio album? She said 'no covers'. I then naturally asked her how it was....

Her answer: "Fantastic"



So...  Your source is a random person on Twitter?

Ok then.  :forfucksake



_____________________________________



It is not 'my' source...

Possibly I shouldn't have mentioned it at all here?

Either way .. I'm simply relaying something I saw on IORR and then I conversed with the same person a bit about it and her experience  (I wouldn't think she has any reason to lie about it being as it won't go viral etc).


There .. (IORR) folks happen to be much more obliged to talk about said album and much more open to opinions (mine.. and other peoples) ... with less negativity and personal jabs.

After all .. it is a 'RS message board' -


It wasn't a jab Ian. Don't kid yourself, the folks on IORR are just as cynical as folks on here or any other forum. Ive been posting there for 15 years. It's just way more strict over there.

The question is, why would you trust a random person on the internet who claims to have heard the brand new Stones album? People make up stuff like this all the time. It's almost a tradition! It literally happens every single time there is talk of a new tour or album! Surely you know that by now? It's not negativity. It's just incredibly easy to be cynical and snarky when it comes to this band nowadays. That's all.

:nooslajaleisk

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Jul 31st, 2016 at 6:27pm

leonid wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 5:24pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 4:05pm:

leonid wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:44pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Jul 29th, 2016 at 6:55pm:
Word has it the album is not of blues covers and is new material. Album is basically finished and there is someone who .....has heard some of it. This person recently visited Don Was at Capital Records (in which he is President of Blue Note Records).

She said she spent the night there and he was showing them his office (with all kinds of music memorabilia). She told him she loved The Rolling Stones upon seeing some things on them in his office. Don Was told her that they are coming out with a new album and he could sense her excitement so he let her listen to a song.

She told Don Was she would ...'burn her phone'...(referring to her not being able to replay any of it).... if she could just please hear more / the album.  She was.. well .. let's just say 'over-joyed' .. (<to put it very mildly lol).

He played her what they have. I specifically asked if they were blues covers ..or for a blues covers album or was it a new studio album? She said 'no covers'. I then naturally asked her how it was....

Her answer: "Fantastic"



So...  Your source is a random person on Twitter?

Ok then.  :forfucksake



_____________________________________



It is not 'my' source...

Possibly I shouldn't have mentioned it at all here?

Either way .. I'm simply relaying something I saw on IORR and then I conversed with the same person a bit about it and her experience  (I wouldn't think she has any reason to lie about it being as it won't go viral etc).


There .. (IORR) folks happen to be much more obliged to talk about said album and much more open to opinions (mine.. and other peoples) ... with less negativity and personal jabs.

After all .. it is a 'RS message board' -


It wasn't a jab Ian. Don't kid yourself, the folks on IORR are just as cynical as folks on here or any other forum. Ive been posting there for 15 years. It's just way more strict over there.

The question is, why would you trust a random person on the internet who claims to have heard the brand new Stones album? People make up stuff like this all the time. It's almost a tradition! It literally happens every single time there is talk of a new tour or album! Surely you know that by now? It's not negativity. It's just incredibly easy to be cynical and snarky when it comes to this band nowadays. That's all.

:nooslajaleisk



________________________________________


What I'm saying is every time someone posts something here it gets shot down by 80% of the people .. or totally scoffed at .. ...

... just for the sake of shooting it down and scoffing at it? ...

... to the point where ya can't even post much here anymore without that situation occurring .. that aspect has gotten so out of hand here it's become ridiculous.

I didn't say it was for 'certain' .. I said I believed her .. This is what someone said is all. It could be dead wrong.

However this person 'does' know Don Was ... and this person isn't a standard RS fan wanting attention.


I figured it better to post it as a possibility and at least put it out there rather than not post or mention it at all ... right? ..

Whether it turns out to be spot on or complete bullocks ..

... again .. like I said .. and after all ...

>>this forum is a Rolling Stones message board and this thread is concerning any news about the new album ..

Not sure why I have to explain the post .. I'm simply relaying what I came across. I could be crazy .. but I kinda / sorta thought that's what this thread / message board was all about and that's what you are supposed to do?

.. Anyway .. .. ......

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by MrPleasant on Jul 31st, 2016 at 9:44pm
Ian, you rule.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 1st, 2016 at 12:04am

MrPleasant wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 9:44pm:
Ian, you rule.




_____________________



Well .. Thx much and how..'pleasant' of you. Ha

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 1st, 2016 at 2:24pm
are we trending?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 1st, 2016 at 4:47pm

Some Guy wrote on Aug 1st, 2016 at 2:24pm:
are we trending?


________________________________________


I think it may be safe to say that some people might just we are Mr. Some guy (ha) ....




Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:04pm
Breaking news. The title for the new album has leaked.

"Ian's 19th Nervous Breakdown"

To be released in 2018. Keith has described it as their most inspired release since Grrr.

When asked to comment on the upcoming album, Ronnie Wood had this to say: "We really wanted to do something fresh. So we cut a bunch of old blues covers. The ideas just kept coming."

:interestingstuffronnie

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 13th, 2016 at 9:44am
are we giving up?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 13th, 2016 at 5:11pm

Some Guy wrote on Aug 13th, 2016 at 9:44am:
are we giving up?



________________________________


I'd say we are one part disgusted .. and another part pretty disappointed due to their not being so direct (or certain) about when it is to come .. or what the heck the musical content is going to be .. .....

But no .. we aren't giving up (not just yet anyway). .. :D


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Aug 13th, 2016 at 5:34pm
No need to give up the fight...it's been "confirmed" by all Stones ( except Jagger- I think)...

What it will actually be...or be called...or contain...well...that is part of the fun, innit?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on Aug 14th, 2016 at 2:27am
It will (one day) drop like the finest Wundervoll silk knickers.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqL-jOV194A

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by lavendar on Aug 20th, 2016 at 8:55am
An Ti Ci Pa Tion

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 20th, 2016 at 9:03pm

So ... now they are thinking about pushing the new album back .. (<< F***K THAT!!! I know Lol smh) and releasing the Blues covers album first (possibly that is the plan. It was was at least discussed according to a few people who work for Universal Marketing team).


Nobody is sure of their plans.. but I know one thing .. it sho as heeeeealll aint getting any earlier.

Word has it they worked during June .. July and even into August on it (off and on ..not totally steady). They also did three weeks in April (off and on). As well (and as we all already were well aware of) they did the two week stint last December .. and they tidied things up a bit in January on it (nuttin major there at all in January of 15 was the very unofficial word on that month.. ).

Anyway .. that is the word. Nobody knows what they have.. or what is getting released or when ..  All is STILL (<<Ikr) a mystery there.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Aug 21st, 2016 at 5:39am

Ian Billen wrote on Aug 20th, 2016 at 9:03pm:
Anyway .. that is the word. Nobody knows what they have.. or what is getting released or when ..  All is STILL (<<Ikr) a mystery there.



For more information...Refer to page 1 of this thread.... :warhorse

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Bitch on Aug 21st, 2016 at 8:29am
How is doing something fresh covering old material? Thats more of a re-fresh.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Aug 21st, 2016 at 12:57pm


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 21st, 2016 at 2:28pm

Bitch wrote on Aug 21st, 2016 at 8:29am:
How is doing something fresh covering old material? Thats more of a re-fresh.



______________________________________


I agree. Doing blues covers is not keeping The Stones fresh or any more or less relevant. Doing an album of all blues covers and releasing it only keeps them 'active'... nothing more.

Not sure where a few people are considering a blues covers release would make them or keep them more relevant? If anything.. that is a 'throw back'... not something relevant in todays market. Sure I wouldn't mind it.. but it would only keep them 'active' .. not relevant and such release would be geared toward blues lovers and Stones purists.

Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 21st, 2016 at 3:02pm
jb ain't buying it.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Aug 21st, 2016 at 9:10pm
An all blues album will sink like a lead zeppelin...

Any new music they put out will never be relevant in today's market...did you think ABB or D&G were relevant?

Their live shows sell out because of folks like us ( who are in the vast minority of the crowd) and  corporate types / folks w/ connections and for those who think its cool to pay 800 for a ticket to and wear it like some sort of status...the warhorse crowd...

The shows are half way sold out a week before the sale dates...

Anyone else but me score tickets to NY/NJ in 1981 with the mail-in lottery they had??
That was some exciting shit right there!!!
Scored one nite at Brenden Byrne Arena and one night at MSG!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 21st, 2016 at 10:38pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Aug 21st, 2016 at 9:10pm:
An all blues album will sink like a lead zeppelin...

Any new music they put out will never be relevant in today's market...did you think ABB or D&G were relevant?

Their live shows sell out because of folks like us ( who are in the vast minority of the crowd) and  corporate types / folks w/ connections and for those who think its cool to pay 800 for a ticket to and wear it like some sort of status...the warhorse crowd...

The shows are half way sold out a week before the sale dates...

Anyone else but me score tickets to NY/NJ in 1981 with the mail-in lottery they had??
That was some exciting shit right there!!!
Scored one nite at Brenden Byrne Arena and one night at MSG!!



_______________________________

Look, I'm not saying ABB or D & G were relevant or made them any more relevant or not. I'm not saying a brand new studio album will or won't either (see below).

What I'm saying is <if> they were trying to make some kind of attempt to stay relevant.. or even grab back just a smidgen of relevance the very last thing to <try> to regain some of that would be to put out a 'covers album' of Blues tracks. That is all I'm trying to say here... smh Lol

Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 7:18am
It's over.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 1:30pm
Ian...that was not directed towards you...it was just me ranting...trying to stay relevant on these boards, LOL

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 1:44pm
moonie needs to release his best post since '81.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 7:23pm

Some Guy wrote on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 1:44pm:
moonie needs to release his best post since '81.

His only post?  :warhorse

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BILL PERKS on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 9:35pm
Blues covers record in December.
This aint bringin Maxlugar back.
:sad

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Joey on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 9:43pm

Some Guy wrote on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 7:18am:
It's over.




Me ARSE !!!!!!


BEST STONES YET !!!!!!!


UNBELIEVABLE STONES !!!!!!!






Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 10:19pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 1:30pm:
Ian...that was not directed towards you...it was just me ranting...trying to stay relevant on these boards, LOL




____________________________________


Ahhhh I gotcha. My bad.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 10:23pm


It appears The Stones will not release a new studio album this year. In December they are going to release an all blues covers album. IORR is 'officially' reporting it. Sure... nothing is for certain but Bv is 'generally' accurate (<< not 100% of the time but ...generally speaking hes 'usually' correct).


Word has it Universal (and probably The Stones) want to wait until the market is better to release a new studio album (uhh ... really? ... Seriously?? .. Awwwwe ..poor Stones .. The market isn't good enough for them).

So ... after 12 years we are getting an album of covers .. How bloody fantastic ..

Sure.. I'll buy it and it will most likely be pretty cool .. but really.. that is the best they can do???

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by andrews27 on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 10:28pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Aug 21st, 2016 at 9:10pm:

Anyone else but me score tickets to NY/NJ in 1981 with the mail-in lottery they had??
That was some exciting shit right there!!!
Scored one nite at Brenden Byrne Arena and one night at MSG!!


I did!  I scored one of the MSG nights, but our seats were in the floor-level stands at the opposite end from the stage, so visibility and sound quality were greatly diminished, even standing up.  My fifth Stones show (of 14).  I still have one of the postcards - drawn by the stage backdrop artist - that they sent the losers, since my gf and I both entered and one of us won.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:11am

BILL PERKS wrote on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 9:35pm:
Blues covers record in December.
This aint bringin Maxlugar back.
:sad


Thanks PERKS, my sources tell me it will be electro blues type music and that bitches will be happy. I have connections where there are none.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 12:21pm
Album art leaked. It's not a blues cover album after all.


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 1:49pm

leonid wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 12:21pm:
Album art leaked. It's not a blues cover album after all.





Steven Tyler already has the jump on that !!  :forfucksake

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 4:57pm

Ian Billen wrote on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 10:23pm:
It appears The Stones will not release a new studio album this year. In December they are going to release an all blues covers album. IORR is 'officially' reporting it. Sure... nothing is for certain but Bv is 'generally' accurate (<< not 100% of the time but ...generally speaking hes 'usually' correct).


Word has it Universal (and probably The Stones) want to wait until the market is better to release a new studio album (uhh ... really? ... Seriously?? .. Awwwwe ..poor Stones .. The market isn't good enough for them).

So ... after 12 years we are getting an album of covers .. How bloody fantastic ..

Sure.. I'll buy it and it will most likely be pretty cool .. but really.. that is the best they can do???



Yep. Something they cranked out in two days 8 months ago which could have been done with minimal effort at any time in the last 19 years when they managed just one album of new songs.

But hey, better late than never. Plus, Mick seems to be singing better these days than when he was plagued by a terrible outbreak of over-enunciating about five years ago (see that execrable cover of 'Watching the river flow' from around then).

In fact, why wait another three or four months. Just put the fucker out now if its ready. Its not as if they have to tie this release in with a 'tour' or anything.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 6:14pm

Gazza wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 4:57pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Aug 22nd, 2016 at 10:23pm:
It appears The Stones will not release a new studio album this year. In December they are going to release an all blues covers album. IORR is 'officially' reporting it. Sure... nothing is for certain but Bv is 'generally' accurate (<< not 100% of the time but ...generally speaking hes 'usually' correct).


Word has it Universal (and probably The Stones) want to wait until the market is better to release a new studio album (uhh ... really? ... Seriously?? .. Awwwwe ..poor Stones .. The market isn't good enough for them).

So ... after 12 years we are getting an album of covers .. How bloody fantastic ..

Sure.. I'll buy it and it will most likely be pretty cool .. but really.. that is the best they can do???



Yep. Something they cranked out in two days 8 months ago which could have been done with minimal effort at any time in the last 19 years when they managed just one album of new songs.

But hey, better late than never. Plus, Mick seems to be singing better these days than when he was plagued by a terrible outbreak of over-enunciating about five years ago (see that execrable cover of 'Watching the river flow' from around then).

In fact, why wait another three or four months. Just put the fucker out now if its ready. Its not as if they have to tie this release in with a 'tour' or anything.



Gazza. I agree here with you 100% on every account.

They could hold back The Blues album until next winter .. then release it. There has been talk the new studio album is now done .. Then Universal says they are working on it all the time??  (who knows.. ? They have been all over the map with their comments).

A blues album of covers is something not difficult for this group and we had to wait all this time to get 'that'...??

You are right... No they don't have to tour.. They could just put out an album... It's what we most want. Then they could even put out the Blues thing next December... but finish and release a F***G album will ya? Dammmmn.

All they do is retread old waters anymore...wow?

What is the whole point of the Vegas Show? All this makes no sense... and like I said I will certainly buy the blues album and I do look forward to it but geeze.. how bout a new album first (and instead) boys?

It isnt about The music.. it is about squeezing a few dollars out of the most prone time. IMO it wont make hardly a  difference in their case. The people who are going to buy the record will buy it now...or whenever.. Nobody says to themselves "..Well .. I'm not into The Stones.. BUT ya know what... the record (album) market is coming back now a dayz.. looks like Ill go get or download The new Stones record after all.." (I mean come on).

The people who are going to get are going to do such regardless of the market. Having a good market isn't going to make that much of a dent on their sales either way. A good market won't make that much difference in their case.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:00pm
European tour looking highly probable for next summer.

Good promotional tool for a new album of new songs.

Working title rumoured to be "Ten new songs you'll never hear live".

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:40pm

Gazza wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:00pm:
European tour looking highly probable for next summer.

Good promotional tool for a new album of new songs.

Working title rumoured to be "Ten new songs you'll never hear live".


do the Stones people like us?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:50pm
my people are hearing it will be a deep down dirty blues rendition of Emotional Rescue track for track.



Emotional Rescue- it's not just a song... it's an album.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:31pm

Ian Billen wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 6:14pm:
Gazza. I agree here with you 100% on every account.



Calling the Demon Lord now...gonna ask if frozen pigs are flying around down there..
.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:09pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:31pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 6:14pm:
Gazza. I agree here with you 100% on every account.



Calling the Demon Lord now...gonna ask if frozen pigs are flying around down there..
.


Ian has seen the light!

:nicetits

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Aug 24th, 2016 at 7:45am
Is it possible the new stuff isn't up to snuff? After a few listens the boys are going back to the drawing board??

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Holden on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:47am

leonid wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 12:21pm:
Album art leaked. It's not a blues cover album after all.



Honestly I would absolutely looove a country covers album,  they do country so well and it always sounds genuine. Have some cool guests like Willy and Hank III  and you could have a killer album. It's probably their best chance of commercial success too. Country is HUGE and they don't put much emphasis on age.

Ever met a country fan who didn't like the Stones? I can see all four of them dressed in rhinestones and cowboy hats,  giving a press conference on Charlie's horses and riding away into the sunset.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Aug 24th, 2016 at 11:08am

Holden wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:47am:
I can see all four of them dressed in rhinestones and cowboy hats



Nudie suits are so yesterday.......




Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 24th, 2016 at 12:32pm

gimmekeef wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 7:45am:
Is it possible the new stuff isn't up to snuff? After a few listens the boys are going back to the drawing board??




Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Aug 24th, 2016 at 1:26pm
You realise this board is run by a bloody Mexican, right?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Aug 24th, 2016 at 2:42pm

Gazza wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:00pm:
European tour looking highly probable for next summer.

Good promotional tool for a new album of new songs.

Working title rumoured to be "Ten new songs you'll never hear live".

:spooky :forfucksake :wtf2

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BILL PERKS on Aug 24th, 2016 at 10:03pm

Some Guy wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 12:32pm:

gimmekeef wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 7:45am:
Is it possible the new stuff isn't up to snuff? After a few listens the boys are going back to the drawing board??





GRAND SLAM CAPS POSTIN !!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Aug 24th, 2016 at 10:41pm

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 25th, 2016 at 8:30am

BILL PERKS wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 10:03pm:

Some Guy wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 12:32pm:

gimmekeef wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 7:45am:
Is it possible the new stuff isn't up to snuff? After a few listens the boys are going back to the drawing board??





GRAND SLAM CAPS POSTIN !!


what we do...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Aug 26th, 2016 at 1:44am
VOODOO????


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Aug 26th, 2016 at 12:20pm
One day soon folks will be postin' links to brand new Stones songs in this very thread!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Aug 26th, 2016 at 2:04pm

Some Guy wrote on Aug 26th, 2016 at 12:20pm:
One day soon folks will be postin' links to brand new Stones songs in this very thread!





Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by CS on Aug 31st, 2016 at 10:14pm
Is this the cover of the new album?



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by CS on Aug 31st, 2016 at 10:16pm
Thanks Marcelo Quatraro, my doubt is that there ain't nothing on IORR and that image says it was taken from there

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Sep 1st, 2016 at 8:02am
NO, it is not the cover

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 9th, 2016 at 6:38am
https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Sep 9th, 2016 at 8:56am

Some Guy wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 6:38am:
https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM


Wow! Talk about sucking in the Seventies!  :nooslajaleisk

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 9th, 2016 at 12:38pm
"Wow! Talk about sucking in the Seventies!"

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Fuck+You+Gazza%2C+Will+Ya%3F

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Sep 9th, 2016 at 2:52pm

Some Guy wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 6:38am:
https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM


:wtf2

The back of my balls bears more resemblance to the Stones than that

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Sep 9th, 2016 at 5:01pm

Gazza wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 2:52pm:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 6:38am:
https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM


:wtf2

The back of my balls bears more resemblance to the Stones than that



Speaking of which.......



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Sep 10th, 2016 at 6:20am

Gazza wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 2:52pm:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 6:38am:
https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM


:wtf2

The back of my balls bears more resemblance to the Stones than that

First of all, not sure how you can check. Second of all, I don't really want to know. :forfucksake :scary

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 16th, 2016 at 9:27pm
Expect some big news any day now.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on Sep 17th, 2016 at 2:00am
If it has a half-a-trouser-sized glimmer of this sort of dirtiness -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HmuJA1aHQE -
the blues album could be a rather lovely thing, sh*rley?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 17th, 2016 at 9:21am

WaiteringOnAFiend wrote on Sep 17th, 2016 at 2:00am:
If it has a half-a-trouser-sized glimmer of this sort of dirtiness -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HmuJA1aHQE -
the blues album could be a rather lovely thing, sh*rley?


It's time to remind the world who we are.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Sep 17th, 2016 at 2:02pm

Some Guy wrote on Sep 16th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Expect some big news any day now.



This thread has certainly delivered.

:interestingstuffronnie

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 17th, 2016 at 4:55pm

leonid wrote on Sep 17th, 2016 at 2:02pm:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 16th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Expect some big news any day now.



This thread has certainly delivered.

:interestingstuffronnie


Stay Frosty.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Sep 17th, 2016 at 9:45pm

Some Guy wrote on Sep 17th, 2016 at 4:55pm:

leonid wrote on Sep 17th, 2016 at 2:02pm:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 16th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Expect some big news any day now.



This thread has certainly delivered.

:interestingstuffronnie


Stay Frosty.



This ain't bringing Saint Sway back.

:nooslajaleisk

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 18th, 2016 at 7:16am

leonid wrote on Sep 17th, 2016 at 9:45pm:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 17th, 2016 at 4:55pm:

leonid wrote on Sep 17th, 2016 at 2:02pm:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 16th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Expect some big news any day now.



This thread has certainly delivered.

:interestingstuffronnie


Stay Frosty.



This ain't bringing Saint Sway back.

:nooslajaleisk




Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Sep 18th, 2016 at 11:32am

Edith Grove wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 8:56am:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 6:38am:
https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM


Wow! Talk about sucking in the Seventies!  :nooslajaleisk



W....T....F ?!?!?!?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Sep 18th, 2016 at 4:20pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Sep 18th, 2016 at 11:32am:

Edith Grove wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 8:56am:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 6:38am:
https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM


Wow! Talk about sucking in the Seventies!  :nooslajaleisk



W....T....F ?!?!?!?


Take on a Stones compilation album title.

That "new Stones song" SG posted sounded like lame 70's prog rock.  :waka-jawaka

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 19th, 2016 at 3:56pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Sep 18th, 2016 at 11:32am:

Edith Grove wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 8:56am:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 9th, 2016 at 6:38am:
https://youtu.be/ni3eY5B_WWM


Wow! Talk about sucking in the Seventies!  :nooslajaleisk



W....T....F ?!?!?!?


Excited??

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 21st, 2016 at 8:32am
This thread is letting me down.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Sep 21st, 2016 at 8:48am

Some Guy wrote on Sep 21st, 2016 at 8:32am:
This thread is letting me down.


What a great idea for the next cover !


https://youtu.be/8cYCubol7a0

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Sep 22nd, 2016 at 10:29am

Some Guy wrote on Sep 21st, 2016 at 8:32am:
This thread is letting me down.



__________________________________

Hmmmmm .. how about the new album title .. 'Manhattan Blues'? Love The Manhattan Beach thing so much I gave it a try anyway? ..

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 22nd, 2016 at 3:26pm

Ian Billen wrote on Sep 22nd, 2016 at 10:29am:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 21st, 2016 at 8:32am:
This thread is letting me down.



__________________________________

Hmmmmm .. how about the new album title .. 'Manhattan Blues'? Love The Manhattan Beach thing so much I gave it a try anyway? ..


How about Holding my breath till I turn blue?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Sep 22nd, 2016 at 10:10pm

Some Guy wrote on Sep 22nd, 2016 at 3:26pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Sep 22nd, 2016 at 10:29am:

Some Guy wrote on Sep 21st, 2016 at 8:32am:
This thread is letting me down.



__________________________________

Hmmmmm .. how about the new album title .. 'Manhattan Blues'? Love The Manhattan Beach thing so much I gave it a try anyway? ..


How about Holding my breath till I turn blue?



_______________________

Ikr... lol. Still no indication on anything .. I tell ya... Ronnie says within the next couple of months... I tell ya ..

These boys sho aint in no hurry to let this thing drop. Word has it it isn't coming until early December. That is when we will get The Blues album, supposedly.

I hear it's been done since Laaaaaaaaast December ...lol (no kidding.. at least that is what Don Was said word for word in a radio Interview. As well ...  that is how Ronnie portrayed it all the way back to April...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 24th, 2016 at 10:02am



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Sep 29th, 2016 at 4:18pm
Jagger posted this on his facebook page this morning.

I posted this link on our facebook page earlier, surprised no one bothered commenting on it here

https://www.facebook.com/mickjaggerofficial/photos/a.221653821201808.63154.178001948900329/1272246069475906/?type=3&theater



For those without facebook, the caption accompanying the photo was Watch this space #playingtheblues

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by andrews27 on Sep 29th, 2016 at 6:52pm
Mick!  It's not too late to title it The Gouster.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Sep 30th, 2016 at 4:59pm

A few more tidbits on the new blues album:

http://ultimateclassicrock.com/rolling-stones-blues-album/

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Sep 30th, 2016 at 6:10pm
"It's Coming.....  "





(Posters with the above image popped up in the last 24 hours in London and was posted on the Stones official account today. There was even a brief ad on TV tonight - no announcement, just a teaser

Release date may be December 2nd.  With all these teasers starting to happen, I'd expect an official announcement any day now.....)



You have all been given permission to get a bit of a tingle.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Sep 30th, 2016 at 6:24pm
We should be hearing some new tunes soon, no?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Sep 30th, 2016 at 7:37pm
https://www.facebook.com/KeithRichards/photos/a.262061300505401.65715.126524600725739/1259184820793039/?type=3&theater

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Sep 30th, 2016 at 7:37pm
It seems that 'Blue' is the colour.....

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by FotiniD on Oct 1st, 2016 at 8:38am
All this is beyond exciting and crazy that it's actually finally happening.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Oct 1st, 2016 at 9:11am
Hopefully some early releases on XM Satelite etc.....just release the damn thing ffs

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:07am

gimmekeef wrote on Oct 1st, 2016 at 9:11am:
Hopefully some early releases on XM Satelite etc.....just release the damn thing ffs


my sources are reaching out to their sources.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:29am

Some Guy wrote on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:07am:

gimmekeef wrote on Oct 1st, 2016 at 9:11am:
Hopefully some early releases on XM Satelite etc.....just release the damn thing ffs


my sources are reaching out to their sources.

Are your sources outsourced?  :spooky

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:45am

sweetcharmedlife wrote on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:29am:

Some Guy wrote on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:07am:

gimmekeef wrote on Oct 1st, 2016 at 9:11am:
Hopefully some early releases on XM Satelite etc.....just release the damn thing ffs


my sources are reaching out to their sources.

Are your sources outsourced?  :spooky


They won't be after Trump is elected.  :thatwassmart

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 1st, 2016 at 4:19pm
Will the single leak tonight?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:49pm
'Blue Tongue' should be the name of the album, shirley?


"Blue tongue: A symptom which occurs when the tongue is blue in appearance."
[ http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/sym/blue_tongue.htm ]


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:51pm
Or 'Blue Tongues', as it was performed in a raucous circle?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 7:08am
Latest tweet says something is coming October 6.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 7:41am

Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 7:08am:
Latest tweet says something is coming October 6.


Tarps arrive at Desert Trip?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 8:16am

gimmekeef wrote on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 7:41am:

Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 7:08am:
Latest tweet says something is coming October 6.


Tarps arrive at Desert Trip?


lol
greeting status upgraded.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 8:26am

WaiteringOnAFiend wrote on Oct 1st, 2016 at 11:51pm:
Or 'Blue Tongues', as it was performed in a raucous circle?



BLUE LICKS??

Lickin' The Blues?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Bitch on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 9:33am
Tongue Blues

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 10:52am


Adelaide pygmy blue-tongue skink


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adelaide_pygmy_blue-tongue_skink

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 2:34pm

gimmekeef wrote on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 7:41am:

Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 2nd, 2016 at 7:08am:
Latest tweet says something is coming October 6.


Tarps arrive at Desert Trip?

Julio Jones quality posting.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 4:33pm
Wow, state of the art audio technology with a touch of 60s technology



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Grove_Studios

British Grove Studios is a recording studio located at 20 British Grove in Chiswick, West London, owned by musician Mark Knopfler.

British Grove Studios was built by Mark Knopfler as "a monument to past and future technology".[1] It has two studios. Alongside modern technology, the equipment includes two old EMI mixing consoles: a very rare tube desk from the 1960s like the ones used by George Martin and The Beatles and a later console on which the album Band on the Run was recorded.[1] The large console in studio one is a custom-made Neve 88R, while the console in studio two is an API Legacy. The main speakers are ATC monitors in a 5.1 configuration.[2] Specifically, the full-range models are ATC SCM 300ASL (300A) mounted in standard left-center-right configuration, with two more 300As on a unique track system for surround. Dual ATC SCM0.1/15ASL PRO (Sub 1/15) subwoofers alongside the left and right mains provide the LFE monitoring.

In February 2009, British Grove Studio was the winner of the Music Producers Guild Award for 'Best Studio'.[3]

Recordings[edit]

The following albums were recorded at British Grove Studios:
On an Island by David Gilmour (2006) (sections of the album)
Razorlight by Razorlight (2006)
The Boy with No Name by Travis (2007)[4]
Kill to Get Crimson by Mark Knopfler, (2007)
The Age of Understatement by The Last Shadow Puppets (2007)
Footsteps by Chris de Burgh (2008)
The Age of the Understatement by The Last Shadow Puppets (2008)
Hayley Sings Japanese Songs by Hayley Westenra (2008)[5]
Beautiful You by Greg Pearle and John Illsley (2008)
Songs for My Mother by Ronan Keating (2009)
Get Lucky by Mark Knopfler (2009)
Endlessly by Duffy (2010)
Serotonin by Mystery Jets (2010)
The Sailor's Revenge by Bap Kennedy (2012)
Privateering by Mark Knopfler (2012)
Heart of Nowhere by Noah and the Whale (2013)
Tierra by Vicente Amigo (2013)
The Breeze: An Appreciation of JJ Cale by Eric Clapton & Friends (2014)
The New Classic by Iggy Azalea (2014)[6]
Tracker by Mark Knopfler (2015)
I Still Do by Eric Clapton (2016)


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 4:35pm
https://youtu.be/PP3mx9A7WrU

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 5:10pm

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 4:35pm:
https://youtu.be/PP3mx9A7WrU


they could scrape up a whole 10 second teaser? don't strain yourselves boys!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 5:49pm

gimmekeef wrote on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 5:10pm:

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 4:35pm:
https://youtu.be/PP3mx9A7WrU


they could scrape up a whole 10 second teaser? don't strain yourselves boys!



Surprised TD was not playing

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 8:32pm
Judging by that mixing console labeling, we'll be getting a Keef track.

I'm studying this fucking thing like the Zapruder film.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BILL PERKS on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 9:23pm
This aint bringing Olympic Studios back.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 4th, 2016 at 5:28am
PERKS is in the house!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by riffkeither on Oct 4th, 2016 at 2:44pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOAh8hm9lZM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ku5jCJLPQ2w

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 4th, 2016 at 3:28pm

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 3rd, 2016 at 4:35pm:
https://youtu.be/PP3mx9A7WrU

Does not move me.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Oct 4th, 2016 at 5:33pm
Another 5 1/2 second teaser:

https://twitter.com/RollingStones/status/783278630252183552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 4th, 2016 at 6:33pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Oct 4th, 2016 at 5:33pm:
Another 5 1/2 second teaser:

https://twitter.com/RollingStones/status/783278630252183552?ref_src=twsrc^tfw


underwhelming... the guys are out of ideas.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by christijanus on Oct 5th, 2016 at 5:34am
For what it is worth, announchement Bol.com for CD and Deluxe CD:
https://www.bol.com/nl/p/blue-and-lonesome/9200000065869998/?suggestionType=typedsearch

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 5th, 2016 at 6:21am
My sources are reporting the album is titled Joey's Nuts.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Oct 5th, 2016 at 8:50am
Blue and lonesome, as in so lonesome I could cry ?

We be gettin' country on this album as well ?





Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 5th, 2016 at 9:50am
The title track is a cover of this :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFi00j1joZ8

The first single is rumoured to be a cover of this :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EITZ2CmJam8

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 5th, 2016 at 9:58am
The release date (as mentioned before) will be December 2nd.

Album title is confirmed as "Blue and Lonesome"

Official announcement is tomorrow (Thursday) at  2PM GMT / 6AM PST / 9AM EST

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Oct 5th, 2016 at 12:30pm
Tomorrow 6:00 AM EST the release of the first single "Just your fool" (Little Walter covcer)


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Oct 5th, 2016 at 12:34pm

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 12:30pm:
Tomorrow 6:00 AM EST the release of the first single "Just your fool" (Little Walter covcer)

Digital downloads I presume?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Oct 5th, 2016 at 1:14pm
Yes

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Joey on Oct 5th, 2016 at 1:16pm

Some Guy wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 6:21am:
My sources are reporting the album is titled Joey's Nuts.




Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 5th, 2016 at 3:47pm

Gazza wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 9:50am:
The title track is a cover of this :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFi00j1joZ8

The first single is rumoured to be a cover of this :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EITZ2CmJam8


are we happy??

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 5th, 2016 at 3:49pm
Things are starting to take shape in London this evening (thanks, Deltics)

https://www.instagram.com/p/BLMQzTCDFQJ/


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Oct 5th, 2016 at 4:09pm

Some Guy wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 6:21am:
My sources are reporting the album is titled Joey's Nuts.



No wonder it hasn't dropped yet

:aimama :Youmakeagrownmancrylikejoey

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Oct 5th, 2016 at 4:21pm

Gazza wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 3:49pm:
Things are starting to take shape in London this evening (thanks, Deltics)

https://www.instagram.com/p/BLMQzTCDFQJ/


I like how they color-coordinated the tongue with the "no loading" sign.  :smilemick

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 5th, 2016 at 4:26pm

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 12:30pm:
Tomorrow 6:00 AM EST the release of the first single "Just your fool" (Little Walter covcer)



Thought they'd have waited until Friday for the actual release as that's the standard day for worldwide releases now.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 5th, 2016 at 6:16pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOAh8hm9lZM

The 10-second teaser clip is "Just Your Fool"

Its already listed on shazam

http://www.shazam.com/track/331608717/just-your-fool#referrer=shz.am

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Oct 5th, 2016 at 10:15pm

Gazza wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 4:26pm:

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 12:30pm:
Tomorrow 6:00 AM EST the release of the first single "Just your fool" (Little Walter covcer)



Thought they'd have waited until Friday for the actual release as that's the standard day for worldwide releases now.



______________________________

True. Fridays is the new world release day (instead of Tuesdays). However I think that pertains to 'album releases'.. not necessarily singles.

Jus sayin. BTW.. new clip sounds great doesn't it? It sounds quite raw.. yet has an air of excitement to it.

Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by FPM on Oct 6th, 2016 at 12:28am
I so excited I'm typing this with Joey's nipples!



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by LadyJane on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:08am
WE'VE only been asking for a blues album for, what, about 10 years??!!

This is VERY exciting.

TINGLE!!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:18am

Ian Billen wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 10:15pm:

Gazza wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 4:26pm:

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 12:30pm:
Tomorrow 6:00 AM EST the release of the first single "Just your fool" (Little Walter covcer)



Thought they'd have waited until Friday for the actual release as that's the standard day for worldwide releases now.



______________________________

True. Fridays is the new world release day (instead of Tuesdays). However I think that pertains to 'album releases'.. not necessarily singles.

Jus sayin. BTW.. new clip sounds great doesn't it? It sounds quite raw.. yet has an air of excitement to it.

Ian


Ian, have you heard it? Is it out? What's up?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:38am
6AM eastern and I can't find this god damned song!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 6th, 2016 at 6:24am
Ian, where you at? I'm a very busy man!
This is unacceptable, do I need to search Shidoobee?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 6th, 2016 at 6:30am
Ian, we're not going to write you up but we will document our conversation later today.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 6th, 2016 at 7:30am
are we trending?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Oct 6th, 2016 at 7:39am

Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:38am:
6AM eastern and I can't find this god damned song!


I thought it was 9 am eastern?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by christijanus on Oct 6th, 2016 at 7:45am
Nerveus

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:05am
reportedly on Spotify?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:09am
The Rolling Stones return to the blues with Blue & Lonesome, their first studio album in over a decade. Released December 2nd, Blue & Lonesome is available to pre-order now at www.rollingstones.com. Check out the artwork, a re-imagining of the iconic Stones lips, in an interactive 360 format below!

https://www.facebook.com/therollingstones/

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:09am
Thanks Rogerriffin

This is the track list

1. Just Your Fool
  2. Commit A Crime
  3. Blue And Lonesome
  4. All Of Your Love
  5. I Gotta Go
  6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing
  7. Ride 'Em On Down
  8. Hate To See You Go
  9. Hoo Doo Blues
  10. Little Rain
  11. Just Like I Treat You
  12. I Can't Quit You Baby

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:19am

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Pdog on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:20am
was hoping for an advance single or the entire thing, just as a surprise...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Holden on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:28am
Just your fool is on spotify. It's good. No guitar solo. One take?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child In Wonderland on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:33am

Holden wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:28am:
Just your fool is on spotify. It's good. No guitar solo. One take?


Sounds GOOOOOOD! what a pity is just 2:16

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Pdog on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:36am
looks like the store and iTunes is uk only too... even using vpn, I can't get in...
i'll try youtube, I have a tool to convert the audio into mp3 files from there.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:49am

Pdog wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:36am:
looks like the store and iTunes is uk only too... even using vpn, I can't get in...
i'll try youtube, I have a tool to convert the audio into mp3 files from there.


Hey PDog!....nice to see you here....what tool do you use for recording etc?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Oct 6th, 2016 at 9:48am

Some Guy wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 6:24am:
Ian, where you at? I'm a very busy man!
This is unacceptable, do I need to search Shidoobee?



______________________________________


Howdy Mate! I'm here .. I heard the clip (that's all I've heard). Sounds good.. but is Mick sort of out of breath toward the end of his sentences or is this just how he's singing this one?

Music sounds great and so does his harp however.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by polytoxic on Oct 6th, 2016 at 10:37am
Sounds good. Kind of like Mick's Red Devils sessions. But with the Stones, cut in 3 days, nearly a quarter of a century later...that's one hell of a scheduling conflict.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gimme Shelter on Oct 6th, 2016 at 1:25pm
Just got the single Just Your Fool off of itunes

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 6th, 2016 at 1:37pm

LadyJane wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:08am:
WE'VE only been asking for a blues album for, what, about 10 years??!!

This is VERY exciting.

TINGLE!!!


I think you can triple that estimate.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 6th, 2016 at 1:42pm
Pretty good on first listen. Augurs well for the new album.

Exciting times.

Jagger truly is a beast of a harmonica player.

Here's a spotify playlist of the originals of each of the songs if you fancy checking out what inspired the Stones

https://play.spotify.com/user/exileonmainstreet/playlist/4Zp6qPuN5fFgUYNFSYW1pR

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 6th, 2016 at 1:54pm

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:09am:
Thanks Rogerriffin

This is the track list

1. Just Your Fool
  2. Commit A Crime
  3. Blue And Lonesome
  4. All Of Your Love
  5. I Gotta Go
  6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing
  7. Ride 'Em On Down
  8. Hate To See You Go
  9. Hoo Doo Blues
  10. Little Rain
  11. Just Like I Treat You
  12. I Can't Quit You Baby



There's a bit of Stones history with some of these songs

Mick performed "Everybody Knows About My Baby" at the National Music Day 'Celebration of the Blues' concert at Hammersmith Odeon on 28.6.92. He was backed by Gary Moore and The Midnight Blues Band. The performance was released as a bonus track on the CD single of "Dont Tear Me Up" in April 1993.

Whilst there's (obviously) no recording of it, "Ride 'Em On Down" was played at the first ever Stones concert at the Marquee on 12th July 1962.

And a big thanks to Jos for sourcing the origins of the songs :

1. Just Your Fool (Walter Jacobs)
The original was written and recorded by Little Walter in December 1960 and released on the Checker label, a subsidiary of Chess Records. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

2. Commit A Crime (Chester Burnett)
The original was written and recorded by Howlin’ Wolf on 11 April 1966. It was essentially a new version of a song called, ‘I’m Leaving You’ that was first recorded in September 1958 and released as Chess Records. Neither track was a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

3. Blue And Lonesome (Walter Jacobs)
The original was written and recorded by Little Walter on 12 August 1959. Released on Checker Records, coupled with ‘Mean Ol Frisco’. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

4. All Of Your Love (Samuel Maghett)
The original was written and recorded by Magic Sam in Chicago in 1967 and released on the album, West Side Soul on the Delmark label. Magic Sam originally recorded a version of the song in 1957 as ‘All Your Love’ for the Cobra label. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

5. I Gotta Go (Walter Jacobs)
Written and recorded by Little Walter on 28 April 1955, it was released as the b-side of a Checker single, coupled with ‘Roller Coaster’. The a-side made the Billboard R&B chart on 9 July 1955 and peaked at No.6

6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing (Miles Grayson & Lermon Horton)
Recorded by Little Johnny Taylor in 1971 it made No.9 on the Billboard R & B chart and No.60 on the Hot 100 at the end of the same year. It became the title track of Little Johnny Taylor’s 1972 album on Ronn Records.

7. Ride ‘Em On Down (Eddie Taylor)
Written and recorded by Eddie Taylor’s in Chicago on 5 December 1955 for the Vee-Jay label. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

8. Hate To See You Go (Walter Jacobs)
Witten and recorded on 12 August 1955 by Little Walter and His Jukes for the Checker label as the b-side of ‘Too Late’. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B chart.

9. Hoo Doo Blues (Otis Hicks & Jerry West)
Recorded by Lightnin’ Slim in Crowley, Louisiana 1958 for the Excello label it was not a hit on the Billboard charts

10. Little Rain (Ewart. G.Abner Jr. and Jimmy Reed)
Jimmy Reed recorded this on 9 January 1957 in Chicago for the Vee-Jay label. It wa the a-side of a single with ‘Honey Where You Going’ on the flip side. ‘Little Rain made No.7 on the Billboard R&B charts in April 1957.

11. Just Like I Treat You (Willie Dixon)
Written by Willie Dixon and recorded by Howlin’ Wolf in December 1961, it was released on Chess Records coupled with ‘I Ain’t Superstitious’ in April 1962. It failed to make the Billboard R & B chart.

12. I Can’t Quit You Baby (Willie Dixon)
Written by Willie Dixon and recorded by Otis Rush at his very first session in Chicago in 1956 for the Cobra label. It made No.6 on the Billboard R & B chart in October 1956.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 6th, 2016 at 1:56pm

Ian Billen wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 9:48am:

Some Guy wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 6:24am:
Ian, where you at? I'm a very busy man!
This is unacceptable, do I need to search Shidoobee?



______________________________________


Howdy Mate! I'm here .. I heard the clip (that's all I've heard). Sounds good.. but is Mick sort of out of breath toward the end of his sentences or is this just how he's singing this one?

Music sounds great and so does his harp however.


Dude is old.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Pdog on Oct 6th, 2016 at 2:04pm

gimmekeef wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:49am:
Hey PDog!....nice to see you here....what tool do you use for recording etc?


it's called youtube to mp3, simple to use... at least on mac.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 6th, 2016 at 2:09pm
The first negative review is in - by someone who hasnt even heard the record yet

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/music/rolling-stones-lazy-new-blues-cover-lp-article-1.2820191

I really hope for the sake of the guy that his surname is a pseudonym - otherwise he's been blessed with the most apt name ever for a critic.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Oct 6th, 2016 at 3:24pm
The album was produced by Don Was and The Glimmer Twins and was recorded over the course of just three days in December last year at British Grove Studios...

...Their approach to the album was that it should be spontaneous and played live in the studio without overdubs....

Sounds like a few one to two take versions all around

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Oct 6th, 2016 at 3:43pm

Gazza wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:09am:
Thanks Rogerriffin

This is the track list

1. Just Your Fool
  2. Commit A Crime
  3. Blue And Lonesome
  4. All Of Your Love
  5. I Gotta Go
  6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing
  7. Ride 'Em On Down
  8. Hate To See You Go
  9. Hoo Doo Blues
  10. Little Rain
  11. Just Like I Treat You
  12. I Can't Quit You Baby



There's a bit of Stones history with some of these songs

Mick performed "Everybody Knows About My Baby" at the National Music Day 'Celebration of the Blues' concert at Hammersmith Odeon on 28.6.92. He was backed by Gary Moore and The Midnight Blues Band. The performance was released as a bonus track on the CD single of "Dont Tear Me Up" in April 1993.

Whilst there's (obviously) no recording of it, "Ride 'Em On Down" was played at the first ever Stones concert at the Marquee on 12th July 1962.

And a big thanks to Jos for sourcing the origins of the songs :

1. Just Your Fool (Walter Jacobs)
The original was written and recorded by Little Walter in December 1960 and released on the Checker label, a subsidiary of Chess Records. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

2. Commit A Crime (Chester Burnett)
The original was written and recorded by Howlin’ Wolf on 11 April 1966. It was essentially a new version of a song called, ‘I’m Leaving You’ that was first recorded in September 1958 and released as Chess Records. Neither track was a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

3. Blue And Lonesome (Walter Jacobs)
The original was written and recorded by Little Walter on 12 August 1959. Released on Checker Records, coupled with ‘Mean Ol Frisco’. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

4. All Of Your Love (Samuel Maghett)
The original was written and recorded by Magic Sam in Chicago in 1967 and released on the album, West Side Soul on the Delmark label. Magic Sam originally recorded a version of the song in 1957 as ‘All Your Love’ for the Cobra label. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

5. I Gotta Go (Walter Jacobs)
Written and recorded by Little Walter on 28 April 1955, it was released as the b-side of a Checker single, coupled with ‘Roller Coaster’. The a-side made the Billboard R&B chart on 9 July 1955 and peaked at No.6

6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing (Miles Grayson & Lermon Horton)
Recorded by Little Johnny Taylor in 1971 it made No.9 on the Billboard R & B chart and No.60 on the Hot 100 at the end of the same year. It became the title track of Little Johnny Taylor’s 1972 album on Ronn Records.

7. Ride ‘Em On Down (Eddie Taylor)
Written and recorded by Eddie Taylor’s in Chicago on 5 December 1955 for the Vee-Jay label. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

8. Hate To See You Go (Walter Jacobs)
Witten and recorded on 12 August 1955 by Little Walter and His Jukes for the Checker label as the b-side of ‘Too Late’. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B chart.

9. Hoo Doo Blues (Otis Hicks & Jerry West)
Recorded by Lightnin’ Slim in Crowley, Louisiana 1958 for the Excello label it was not a hit on the Billboard charts

10. Little Rain (Ewart. G.Abner Jr. and Jimmy Reed)
Jimmy Reed recorded this on 9 January 1957 in Chicago for the Vee-Jay label. It wa the a-side of a single with ‘Honey Where You Going’ on the flip side. ‘Little Rain made No.7 on the Billboard R&B charts in April 1957.

11. Just Like I Treat You (Willie Dixon)
Written by Willie Dixon and recorded by Howlin’ Wolf in December 1961, it was released on Chess Records coupled with ‘I Ain’t Superstitious’ in April 1962. It failed to make the Billboard R & B chart.

12. I Can’t Quit You Baby (Willie Dixon)
Written by Willie Dixon and recorded by Otis Rush at his very first session in Chicago in 1956 for the Cobra label. It made No.6 on the Billboard R & B chart in October 1956.



_________________________________


Thank you for this. I was looking them up and listening to them myself ... Leave it to you to have all the research complete.


Thanks so much !! Glad you like it.
Is it better or worse or on par with what you thought it would sound like?

Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Oct 6th, 2016 at 4:14pm

Ian Billen wrote on Apr 19th, 2016 at 12:24am:
All this is pure speculation ... but it 'appears' The Stones will resume 'performing live' activity in October. I'd expect the new album to come out right around that same time.

They are talking about playing a the big music festival known as Coachella on October 7th. I'd expect their own set of shows to be in planning to occur right around the same time ....with the release of the album to coincide with that

... This is all and only based because if they are to be performing live around October... I'd say almost ...'positively'... the album would surely be out / released at that same time.





Ian Billen wrote on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 6:04pm:
Here is what we know for certain...

1. There is a brand new studio album in the works

2. They first got together to officially work on it in December of last year.

3. They cut a few new songs in December and several blues covers (none of the blues covers are certain to make it to the album).


_____________________________________

Strong evidence:

- They are working on it on and off as we speak ..most likely in London (per Keith)
- It is to be released later this year
- Release time frame is this fall.. most likely October / November.

_____________________________________

Pure speculation:

It is an album consisting of mostly Blues covers
The Producer? (nobody knows who it is).

That is where we are. It's the straight dope -





Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by BILL PERKS on Oct 6th, 2016 at 4:29pm
Its nuttin special.  Aint bringin Maxlugar back.


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Oct 6th, 2016 at 4:58pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 3:24pm:
The album was produced by Don Was and The Glimmer Twins and was recorded over the course of just three days in December last year at British Grove Studios...

...Their approach to the album was that it should be spontaneous and played live in the studio without overdubs....

Sounds like a few one to two take versions all around



Hope it's complete with the occasional screwups.  :areyoufuckingserious

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by mojoman on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:01pm
stu would have loved this!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by andrews27 on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:32pm
I take full credit for this after my several "Old school record, please" posts.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:50pm

Ian Billen wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 3:43pm:

Gazza wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:09am:
Thanks Rogerriffin

This is the track list

1. Just Your Fool
  2. Commit A Crime
  3. Blue And Lonesome
  4. All Of Your Love
  5. I Gotta Go
  6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing
  7. Ride 'Em On Down
  8. Hate To See You Go
  9. Hoo Doo Blues
  10. Little Rain
  11. Just Like I Treat You
  12. I Can't Quit You Baby



There's a bit of Stones history with some of these songs

Mick performed "Everybody Knows About My Baby" at the National Music Day 'Celebration of the Blues' concert at Hammersmith Odeon on 28.6.92. He was backed by Gary Moore and The Midnight Blues Band. The performance was released as a bonus track on the CD single of "Dont Tear Me Up" in April 1993.

Whilst there's (obviously) no recording of it, "Ride 'Em On Down" was played at the first ever Stones concert at the Marquee on 12th July 1962.

And a big thanks to Jos for sourcing the origins of the songs :

1. Just Your Fool (Walter Jacobs)
The original was written and recorded by Little Walter in December 1960 and released on the Checker label, a subsidiary of Chess Records. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

2. Commit A Crime (Chester Burnett)
The original was written and recorded by Howlin’ Wolf on 11 April 1966. It was essentially a new version of a song called, ‘I’m Leaving You’ that was first recorded in September 1958 and released as Chess Records. Neither track was a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

3. Blue And Lonesome (Walter Jacobs)
The original was written and recorded by Little Walter on 12 August 1959. Released on Checker Records, coupled with ‘Mean Ol Frisco’. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

4. All Of Your Love (Samuel Maghett)
The original was written and recorded by Magic Sam in Chicago in 1967 and released on the album, West Side Soul on the Delmark label. Magic Sam originally recorded a version of the song in 1957 as ‘All Your Love’ for the Cobra label. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

5. I Gotta Go (Walter Jacobs)
Written and recorded by Little Walter on 28 April 1955, it was released as the b-side of a Checker single, coupled with ‘Roller Coaster’. The a-side made the Billboard R&B chart on 9 July 1955 and peaked at No.6

6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing (Miles Grayson & Lermon Horton)
Recorded by Little Johnny Taylor in 1971 it made No.9 on the Billboard R & B chart and No.60 on the Hot 100 at the end of the same year. It became the title track of Little Johnny Taylor’s 1972 album on Ronn Records.

7. Ride ‘Em On Down (Eddie Taylor)
Written and recorded by Eddie Taylor’s in Chicago on 5 December 1955 for the Vee-Jay label. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

8. Hate To See You Go (Walter Jacobs)
Witten and recorded on 12 August 1955 by Little Walter and His Jukes for the Checker label as the b-side of ‘Too Late’. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B chart.

9. Hoo Doo Blues (Otis Hicks & Jerry West)
Recorded by Lightnin’ Slim in Crowley, Louisiana 1958 for the Excello label it was not a hit on the Billboard charts

10. Little Rain (Ewart. G.Abner Jr. and Jimmy Reed)
Jimmy Reed recorded this on 9 January 1957 in Chicago for the Vee-Jay label. It wa the a-side of a single with ‘Honey Where You Going’ on the flip side. ‘Little Rain made No.7 on the Billboard R&B charts in April 1957.

11. Just Like I Treat You (Willie Dixon)
Written by Willie Dixon and recorded by Howlin’ Wolf in December 1961, it was released on Chess Records coupled with ‘I Ain’t Superstitious’ in April 1962. It failed to make the Billboard R & B chart.

12. I Can’t Quit You Baby (Willie Dixon)
Written by Willie Dixon and recorded by Otis Rush at his very first session in Chicago in 1956 for the Cobra label. It made No.6 on the Billboard R & B chart in October 1956.



_________________________________


Thank you for this. I was looking them up and listening to them myself ... Leave it to you to have all the research complete.


Thanks so much !! Glad you like it.
Is it better or worse or on par with what you thought it would sound like?

Ian



??? I havent heard the Stones versions yet...

Cant take credit for the research. UrbanSteel is the man who deserves the plaudits.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by mojoman on Oct 6th, 2016 at 6:06pm

andrews27 wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:32pm:
I take full credit for this after my several "Old school record, please" posts.


hats off to you for the suggestions and for mr billens scoops!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 6th, 2016 at 6:22pm
Just heard it- It is good! Looking forward to this cd...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:23pm

Gazza wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 5:50pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 3:43pm:

Gazza wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 8:09am:
Thanks Rogerriffin

This is the track list

1. Just Your Fool
  2. Commit A Crime
  3. Blue And Lonesome
  4. All Of Your Love
  5. I Gotta Go
  6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing
  7. Ride 'Em On Down
  8. Hate To See You Go
  9. Hoo Doo Blues
  10. Little Rain
  11. Just Like I Treat You
  12. I Can't Quit You Baby



There's a bit of Stones history with some of these songs

Mick performed "Everybody Knows About My Baby" at the National Music Day 'Celebration of the Blues' concert at Hammersmith Odeon on 28.6.92. He was backed by Gary Moore and The Midnight Blues Band. The performance was released as a bonus track on the CD single of "Dont Tear Me Up" in April 1993.

Whilst there's (obviously) no recording of it, "Ride 'Em On Down" was played at the first ever Stones concert at the Marquee on 12th July 1962.

And a big thanks to Jos for sourcing the origins of the songs :

1. Just Your Fool (Walter Jacobs)
The original was written and recorded by Little Walter in December 1960 and released on the Checker label, a subsidiary of Chess Records. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

2. Commit A Crime (Chester Burnett)
The original was written and recorded by Howlin’ Wolf on 11 April 1966. It was essentially a new version of a song called, ‘I’m Leaving You’ that was first recorded in September 1958 and released as Chess Records. Neither track was a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

3. Blue And Lonesome (Walter Jacobs)
The original was written and recorded by Little Walter on 12 August 1959. Released on Checker Records, coupled with ‘Mean Ol Frisco’. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

4. All Of Your Love (Samuel Maghett)
The original was written and recorded by Magic Sam in Chicago in 1967 and released on the album, West Side Soul on the Delmark label. Magic Sam originally recorded a version of the song in 1957 as ‘All Your Love’ for the Cobra label. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

5. I Gotta Go (Walter Jacobs)
Written and recorded by Little Walter on 28 April 1955, it was released as the b-side of a Checker single, coupled with ‘Roller Coaster’. The a-side made the Billboard R&B chart on 9 July 1955 and peaked at No.6

6. Everybody Knows About My Good Thing (Miles Grayson & Lermon Horton)
Recorded by Little Johnny Taylor in 1971 it made No.9 on the Billboard R & B chart and No.60 on the Hot 100 at the end of the same year. It became the title track of Little Johnny Taylor’s 1972 album on Ronn Records.

7. Ride ‘Em On Down (Eddie Taylor)
Written and recorded by Eddie Taylor’s in Chicago on 5 December 1955 for the Vee-Jay label. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B charts

8. Hate To See You Go (Walter Jacobs)
Witten and recorded on 12 August 1955 by Little Walter and His Jukes for the Checker label as the b-side of ‘Too Late’. It was not a hit on the Billboard R & B chart.

9. Hoo Doo Blues (Otis Hicks & Jerry West)
Recorded by Lightnin’ Slim in Crowley, Louisiana 1958 for the Excello label it was not a hit on the Billboard charts

10. Little Rain (Ewart. G.Abner Jr. and Jimmy Reed)
Jimmy Reed recorded this on 9 January 1957 in Chicago for the Vee-Jay label. It wa the a-side of a single with ‘Honey Where You Going’ on the flip side. ‘Little Rain made No.7 on the Billboard R&B charts in April 1957.

11. Just Like I Treat You (Willie Dixon)
Written by Willie Dixon and recorded by Howlin’ Wolf in December 1961, it was released on Chess Records coupled with ‘I Ain’t Superstitious’ in April 1962. It failed to make the Billboard R & B chart.

12. I Can’t Quit You Baby (Willie Dixon)
Written by Willie Dixon and recorded by Otis Rush at his very first session in Chicago in 1956 for the Cobra label. It made No.6 on the Billboard R & B chart in October 1956.



_________________________________


Thank you for this. I was looking them up and listening to them myself ... Leave it to you to have all the research complete.


Thanks so much !! Glad you like it.
Is it better or worse or on par with what you thought it would sound like?

Ian



??? I havent heard the Stones versions yet...

Cant take credit for the research. UrbanSteel is the man who deserves the plaudits.


______________________________


I mean I was looking up these songs to hear the originals (just to get a lil indication on what was to come on The Stones release) and browsing through their release dates..
and who sang em etc. Now it is all right here for me. Thx.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by FPM on Oct 6th, 2016 at 9:31pm
https://youtu.be/HbRmlHWWU-0
Mick did "Commit A Crime" at the White House a few years back.

I can't wait for the Stones' version.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 7th, 2016 at 5:51am
Guys, the version I heard sounds like he is singing thru a megaphone or something. I hope it's just these lap top speakers but I am concerned as I do not care for that type of sound.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Oct 7th, 2016 at 7:00am

Some Guy wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 5:51am:
Guys, the version I heard sounds like he is singing thru a megaphone or something. I hope it's just these lap top speakers but I am concerned as I do not care for that type of sound.


I strongly suggest you never listen to Winchester Cathedral then......

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Oct 7th, 2016 at 8:42am
The Rolling Stones 'hit a wall' making new music, says Don Was



By Mark Savage
BBC Music reporter


The Rolling Stones' new album of blues covers was created after attempts to record new material faltered, producer Don Was has told the BBC.


"We'd gone in the studio to start cutting some new songs," said Was, who has worked with the band since 1994.

"Around day three we just hit a wall... and Keith suggested that, to cleanse the creative palette, we played Blue and Lonesome, the Little Walter song.

"Fortunately we ran the tape and it was just awesome."

He told BBC Radio 6 Music: "The whole mood of the room changed dramatically in those three-and-a-half minutes. So we said, 'let's do another one', and 'let's do another one'.

"They just called songs off that they knew and loved. It was very spontaneous. And by the end of the day we had six."

The result is Blue and Lonesome, the band's first studio album since 2005's A Bigger Bang.

In total, 12 tracks were recorded over three days at London's British Grove Studios. They are all covers of songs by classic bluesmen, including Howlin' Wolf (Commit a Crime), Little Walter (I Gotta Go) and Jimmy Reed (Little Rain).

"They really know this music well," Was told Matt Everitt. "Most of the songs that are on there are songs they played when they first started out, playing pubs in Richmond, so it's kind of second nature to them.

"They do not play karaoke versions. They found their own way to interpret the blues."

Rock legend Eric Clapton also appears on two tracks, Little Johnny Taylor's Everybody Knows About My Good Thing and Otis Rush's I Can't Quit You Baby.

"Eric Clapton was recording next door," explained Was. "He just walked over and he had the same reaction as everyone else did. His jaw just dropped.

"Picture the Rolling Stones just set up in a circle in one room [and] the amplifiers are blaring.

"It reminded him of when he was a teenager, going to see the Stones playing in Richmond. He was just in awe, so he just grabbed one of Keith's guitars and started playing. It was quite a thing."

Blue and Lonesome will be released in December, while the first single Just Your Fool is available from Friday 7 October, to fans who pre-order the record.

Was added that the Stones had not abandoned plans to complete an album of new material.

"Both Keith and Mick have some great new songs," he told Matt Everitt. "They're far from done."


Follow us on Twitter @BBCNewsEnts, on Instagram, or if you have a story suggestion email [email protected].

http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-37583706

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 7th, 2016 at 1:24pm

FPM wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 9:31pm:
https://youtu.be/HbRmlHWWU-0
Mick did "Commit A Crime" at the White House a few years back.

I can't wait for the Stones' version.



Forgot about that one. Nice one.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by The Wick on Oct 7th, 2016 at 4:12pm

Some Guy wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 5:51am:
Guys, the version I heard sounds like he is singing thru a megaphone or something. I hope it's just these lap top speakers but I am concerned as I do not care for that type of sound.


I think he's singing through the harmonica mic. He did the same on Love Is Strong.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 7th, 2016 at 7:08pm

The Wick wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 4:12pm:

Some Guy wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 5:51am:
Guys, the version I heard sounds like he is singing thru a megaphone or something. I hope it's just these lap top speakers but I am concerned as I do not care for that type of sound.


I think he's singing through the harmonica mic. He did the same on Love Is Strong.




















Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Oct 8th, 2016 at 12:15am

Paranoid Android wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 4:14pm:

Ian Billen wrote on Apr 19th, 2016 at 12:24am:
All this is pure speculation ... but it 'appears' The Stones will resume 'performing live' activity in October. I'd expect the new album to come out right around that same time.

They are talking about playing a the big music festival known as Coachella on October 7th. I'd expect their own set of shows to be in planning to occur right around the same time ....with the release of the album to coincide with that

... This is all and only based because if they are to be performing live around October... I'd say almost ...'positively'... the album would surely be out / released at that same time.





Ian Billen wrote on Apr 22nd, 2016 at 6:04pm:
Here is what we know for certain...

1. There is a brand new studio album in the works

2. They first got together to officially work on it in December of last year.

3. They cut a few new songs in December and several blues covers (none of the blues covers are certain to make it to the album).


_____________________________________

Strong evidence:

- They are working on it on and off as we speak ..most likely in London (per Keith)
- It is to be released later this year
- Release time frame is this fall.. most likely October / November.

_____________________________________

Pure speculation:

It is an album consisting of mostly Blues covers
The Producer? (nobody knows who it is).

That is where we are. It's the straight dope -






_______________________________


Well Thank ya kindly .. though I was not '100%' spot on...

and actually I simply took notes from a few credible people and what The Stones were reporting themselves and pieced it together is all.

There were others looking forecasting things very similar just as well.


Thanks for the kind post though, Mate. Much appreciated.
I always get flack when I'm incorrect (good to see Im noticed when Im not).

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Bitch on Oct 8th, 2016 at 7:31pm
Looking forward to getting it in the least expensive version.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by FPM on Oct 8th, 2016 at 8:55pm
Hahaha...I'm heading over to stonesMart to get the super deluxe edition.  When the Boys finally do exactly what I've prayed they would for decades, the least I can do is support the effort.

Mick's gonna have nappies to buy soon, too.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Oct 8th, 2016 at 10:11pm

FPM wrote on Oct 8th, 2016 at 8:55pm:
Hahaha...I'm heading over to stonesMart to get the super deluxe edition.  When the Boys finally do exactly what I've prayed they would for decades, the least I can do is support the effort.

Mick's gonna have nappies to buy soon, too.


For himself?
:blankfriggingstare1


What does Sirstonesalot think of the Stones releasing a blues album? Is it enough to bring him back?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by FotiniD on Oct 9th, 2016 at 6:51am

Bitch wrote on Oct 8th, 2016 at 7:31pm:
Looking forward to getting it in the least expensive version.


I admire your self-control, I've just ordered both the box set and the vinyl :)

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Oct 9th, 2016 at 9:16am
I bought the single on itunes. That's my contribution.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by The Wick on Oct 9th, 2016 at 1:41pm
I've listened to it a few times now and I absolutely love it. The two things I love about this album are that it is a showcasing of Mick's incredible talent as a bluesman. He is a musicologist with a fascinating and deep knowledge of the blues that he doesn't express enough. Very few people can play the blues harp like him and his inflection when he sings the blues is masterful. I just wish he embraced this side of his vast skill set more.

Also, this sounds like it could have been on their first album. This is the heart of the Rolling Stones. When they do stuff like this, they get to the core of what they were formed for. The way I look at it is that Brian Jones, Bill Wyman, or Stu could easily step in here and it would, more or less, sound like this. Obviously, this is the Rolling Stones in 2016, so no one can reasonably expect them to sound like they did in the early 60s, but this - along with Plundered My Soul - is the best thing they have released in ages. The big problem I see though is that songs need to be given life by being played live, and I doubt more than 1 or 2 of these will get a run out. If they really cared about pushing this album, they could play smaller gigs and only these songs, but that will NEVER happen.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by FPM on Oct 10th, 2016 at 2:06am

I'm so excited about the new blues album that I'm typing this with my PUSSY!  #MAGA!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 10th, 2016 at 7:11am
This is going to be a kick ass album. I can't wait.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 11th, 2016 at 6:22pm
I'm tired of the new song.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Oct 16th, 2016 at 12:29pm

Some Guy wrote on Oct 11th, 2016 at 6:22pm:
I'm tired of the new song.



_____________________________


Here this is. I wasn't seeing this thread for a while (must of over looked it). My bad? Anyway yes.. I am ready for another track as well.

Dont get me wrong... JYF is good.. I dig it.. but I want another glimpse. Ha.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Oct 16th, 2016 at 7:40pm
I wish I could hear the new song enough times to be sick of it.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 17th, 2016 at 4:12pm

Steel Wheels wrote on Oct 16th, 2016 at 7:40pm:
I wish I could hear the new song enough times to be sick of it.


It is weak IMO. If this is the first single off the album, I really hope there is something I can like.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Oct 17th, 2016 at 9:50pm
RocksOff is the only place where I have heard these ( this) song(s)...

where are you hearing them??

FM radio...SiriusXM...Shitifly...The Supermarket?!?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:42am

Paranoid Android wrote on Oct 17th, 2016 at 9:50pm:
RocksOff is the only place where I have heard these ( this) song(s)...

where are you hearing them??

FM radio...SiriusXM...Shitifly...The Supermarket?!?



___________________________________


If you are speaking about the new song played by The Stones themselves (Just your Fool) It is on youtube and available for download.

I have not heard any other clip or even a snippet of another song played by them from this album yet ... Neither has anyone that we all know of.

The songs that are on the album can be found on Youtube by the original artists though many are obscure and some are even simply played on a record and then captured on video ...which then is transferred to You Tube.

Most songs on this album are at least fairly obscure old blues songs (not played much and hardly mentioned... only by the true blues purists). Many I had never heard before. ... A few are real obscure.

Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Soldatti on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:48pm
Just Your Fool on the world charts so far:

#89 Belgium (Flanders)
#134 France
#80 Scotland
#28 Mexico (English Airplay)

#28 Billboard Rock Digital Songs (4,000 copies sold)
http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-digital-song-sales

#1 Billboard Blues Digital Songs
http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/2016-10-29/blues-digital-songs


It didn't chart anywere else so far, no UK Top 200 Singles at all and no Airplay chart in the US (it's taking off on AAA but it's far from the main Top 30, around #70 or so)

It looks like new Stones music is not essential for general audience.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Boogie Chillun in Wonderland on Oct 18th, 2016 at 6:57pm
Thanks Soldatti!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Boogie Chillun in Wonderland on Oct 18th, 2016 at 6:58pm
The Japanese version has no bonus track(s) but the CD format is SHM-CD, lyrics in English and Japanese and includes a sticker with the cover artwork

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Oct 18th, 2016 at 7:28pm

Soldatti wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:48pm:
#28 Billboard Rock Digital Songs (4,000 copies sold)
http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-digital-song-sales


Soldatti wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:48pm:
#28 Billboard Rock Digital Songs (4,000 copies sold)
http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-digital-song-sales


Soldatti wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:48pm:
Just Your Fool on the world charts so far:

#89 Belgium (Flanders)
#134 France
#80 Scotland
#28 Mexico (English Airplay)

#28 Billboard Rock Digital Songs (4,000 copies sold)
http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-digital-song-sales

#1 Billboard Blues Digital Songs
http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/2016-10-29/blues-digital-songs


It didn't chart anywere else so far, no UK Top 200 Singles at all and no Airplay chart in the US (it's taking off on AAA but it's far from the main Top 30, around #70 or so)

It looks like new Stones music is not essential for general audience.


I dont understand these charts...The Stones knocked JOURNEY's Dont Stop Beleiving down from 28 to 30...and AC/DC dropped to number 9 with Thunderstruck...( an awesome song IMO)


Queen up three spots to number 26 w/ Boho Rap...

WHAT?!?


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by andrews27 on Oct 18th, 2016 at 7:31pm
You can hear the original versions of the songs at the links in the article below, unless some of the videos have been removed for copyright considerations:

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/oct/07/rolling-stones-blue-and-lonesome-song-list

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 19th, 2016 at 12:52pm

andrews27 wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 7:31pm:
You can hear the original versions of the songs at the links in the article below, unless some of the videos have been removed for copyright considerations:

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/oct/07/rolling-stones-blue-and-lonesome-song-list


If you have spotify, I did a  playlist of the songs the day the album was announced. You can check it out here.

https://open.spotify.com/user/exileonmainstreet/playlist/4Zp6qPuN5fFgUYNFSYW1pR


In further news, another 'new' song gets its radio premiere tomorrow. BBC Radio 2's Ken Bruce will play "Hate to See You Go" on his show tomorrow which starts at 9.30 am. You can listen live online :

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07xy7x7?ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbc_radio_2&ns_source=facebook&ns_linkname=radio_and_music

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 19th, 2016 at 12:58pm

Soldatti wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:48pm:
Just Your Fool on the world charts so far:

#89 Belgium (Flanders)
#134 France
#80 Scotland
#28 Mexico (English Airplay)

#28 Billboard Rock Digital Songs (4,000 copies sold)
http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-digital-song-sales

#1 Billboard Blues Digital Songs
http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/2016-10-29/blues-digital-songs


It didn't chart anywere else so far, no UK Top 200 Singles at all and no Airplay chart in the US (it's taking off on AAA but it's far from the main Top 30, around #70 or so)

It looks like new Stones music is not essential for general audience.



I wouldnt be surprised. That sort of music just doesnt get on the radio in the 21st century.

Scotland has its own chart? Who knew?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Oct 19th, 2016 at 1:42pm

Gazza wrote on Oct 19th, 2016 at 12:58pm:
Scotland has its own chart? Who knew?


:sad

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Soldatti on Oct 19th, 2016 at 5:30pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 7:28pm:

Soldatti wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:48pm:
#28 Billboard Rock Digital Songs (4,000 copies sold)
http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-digital-song-sales


Soldatti wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:48pm:
#28 Billboard Rock Digital Songs (4,000 copies sold)
http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-digital-song-sales


Soldatti wrote on Oct 18th, 2016 at 5:48pm:
Just Your Fool on the world charts so far:

#89 Belgium (Flanders)
#134 France
#80 Scotland
#28 Mexico (English Airplay)

#28 Billboard Rock Digital Songs (4,000 copies sold)
http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-digital-song-sales

#1 Billboard Blues Digital Songs
http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/2016-10-29/blues-digital-songs


It didn't chart anywere else so far, no UK Top 200 Singles at all and no Airplay chart in the US (it's taking off on AAA but it's far from the main Top 30, around #70 or so)

It looks like new Stones music is not essential for general audience.


I dont understand these charts...The Stones knocked JOURNEY's Dont Stop Beleiving down from 28 to 30...and AC/DC dropped to number 9 with Thunderstruck...( an awesome song IMO)


Queen up three spots to number 26 w/ Boho Rap...

WHAT?!?


Digital Rock Song Sales: Best selling rock songs digitally (Itunes, Amazon, Apple Music, etc)

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Boogie Chillun in Wonderland on Oct 20th, 2016 at 10:48am
Hate 2CU Go, full, no intro, from the BBC broadcast

http://www.rocksoff.org/headers2016/i6-hate-2cu-go.mp3

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 20th, 2016 at 1:58pm
Nice one.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 20th, 2016 at 6:49pm
We predict this album will be a waste of time.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by andrews27 on Oct 20th, 2016 at 6:59pm

Some Guy wrote on Oct 20th, 2016 at 6:49pm:
We predict this album will be a waste of time.


Then it would tie with A Bigger Bang.

A Bigger Bang - Jesus!  It sounds like a post-Roth Van Halen album title.

That guy that punched Mick at Altamont...and all the Hell's Angels...the acid let them hear A Bigger Bang!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Oct 20th, 2016 at 7:07pm
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4y8ulm_the-rolling-stones-hate-to-see-you-go_music

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 22nd, 2016 at 6:50am

andrews27 wrote on Oct 20th, 2016 at 6:59pm:

Some Guy wrote on Oct 20th, 2016 at 6:49pm:
We predict this album will be a waste of time.


Then it would tie with A Bigger Bang.

A Bigger Bang - Jesus!  It sounds like a post-Roth Van Halen album title.

That guy that punched Mick at Altamont...and all the Hell's Angels...the acid let them hear A Bigger Bang!!


prep for suck.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by The Wick on Oct 22nd, 2016 at 9:32am
Reactions seem to be lukewarm which is very surprising. Hate to See You Go is outstanding. The playing is first rate and Mick is singing his heart out.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Boogie Chillun in Wonderland on Oct 22nd, 2016 at 12:12pm

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Oct 20th, 2016 at 10:48am:
Hate 2CU Go, full, no intro, from the BBC broadcast

http://www.rocksoff.org/headers2016/i6-hate-2cu-go.mp3


Now here

https://twitter.com/RollingStones

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Oct 22nd, 2016 at 6:17pm

The Wick wrote on Oct 22nd, 2016 at 9:32am:
Reactions seem to be lukewarm which is very surprising. Hate to See You Go is outstanding. The playing is first rate and Mick is singing his heart out.



the songs just sound weird, not sure what is wrong here. Is he singing through a mega phone or something. I have no idea what brickwalled means but they sound brickwalled.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by lavendar on Oct 22nd, 2016 at 9:45pm

The Wick wrote on Oct 22nd, 2016 at 9:32am:
Reactions seem to be lukewarm which is very surprising. Hate to See You Go is outstanding. The playing is first rate and Mick is singing his heart out.


Lukewarm Because of the Elections, I agree that Mick sounds GRrrrrr

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Soldatti on Nov 2nd, 2016 at 5:43pm
The new singles are getting some airplay:


Billboard Adult Alternative Airplay (Triple A)
Week Ending Oct. 30

#28 NEW - Just Your Fool (202 spins)

http://charts.bdsradio.com/bdsradiocharts/charts.aspx?formatid=7


In the UK, Hate To See You Go went to Radio 2 B-Playlist (10-12 spins a week)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/playlist

Radio 2 will help to sell the album in the UK, at least during the first week.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Nov 7th, 2016 at 11:03am
Just Your Fool sounds fantastic. It was on SiriusXM a few minutes ago. Short and sweet with a vintage sound and typical Stones swagger.

I loved it.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Nov 8th, 2016 at 6:39am
ok, ok, I am starting to feel ya.

https://www.facebook.com/therollingstones/videos/10154909068558287/

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Tom on Nov 8th, 2016 at 8:36am
https://youtu.be/lrIjMzBr-ck

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by The Wick on Nov 8th, 2016 at 11:48am
This is what we have been waiting for for ages. This album is going to be right up there with their best. What I love about this album is that it is all about Mick and Charlie. Both sound unbelievable.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Nov 8th, 2016 at 3:52pm

The Wick wrote on Nov 8th, 2016 at 11:48am:
This is what we have been waiting for for ages. This album is going to be right up there with their best. What I love about this album is that it is all about Mick and Charlie. Both sound unbelievable.


I am agreeable.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Soldatti on Nov 8th, 2016 at 4:21pm
At least the video will buzz the album a little bit on youtube.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Nov 8th, 2016 at 7:44pm
TREMENDOUS. This album will be an instant party. Just add some booze and a wide open area to dance about.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Nov 8th, 2016 at 8:29pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrIjMzBr-ck

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by The Wick on Nov 10th, 2016 at 1:24am
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/arts/music/the-rolling-stones-blue-and-lonesome-album-interview.html?_r=0

Beverly Hills, Calif. — More than five decades after they started, the Rolling Stones are a rock institution still running on intuition, impulse and chemistry. “Blue & Lonesome,” their new album, arrived as a happy accident — or, as Keith Richards said with his piratical cackle, “as if we’d been ordered to do it from some higher being.”

It started as a break from their own material, then suddenly turned into a full-scale throwback: the Stones returning to their early-1960s days as a blues-loving cover band, knocking out songs live in the studio and recording an entire album in three days. “Blue & Lonesome” is the first studio album the Stones have made since “A Bigger Bang” in 2005; it’s due for release on Dec. 2.

Talking about it put smiles on band members’ faces in an afternoon-long string of interviews last month at the Four Seasons Hotel in Beverly Hills, a few days after the band’s jubilant set at the first weekend of the Desert Trip festival in Indio, Calif. “This album,” said the drummer, Charlie Watts, “is what I’ve always wanted the Stones to do. It’s what we do best and what we did when we first got together.”

In conversation, they play long-established roles: Mr. Watts as self-effacing and supportive, the guitarist Ronnie Wood still treating himself as a new band member (he joined in 1975), Mr. Richards as the happy-go-lucky roots music fan and Mick Jagger as the extrovert and detail-watcher.

“Blue & Lonesome” is not the batch of new Jagger-Richards songs that the band has been laboring over intermittently for years between bursts of touring, like the Latin American tour that concluded with an unprecedented concert in Havana and that has been the subject of two documentaries: “Olé Olé Olé” and “Havana Moon.” In recent years, the band has tried to follow up on touring momentum with recording sessions. But the new songs, Mr. Jagger said with a frown, currently add up to “half an album.”

Mr. Wood said new songs need time to settle in. “It’s like putting it on top of the strainer and seeing what soaks through by the time you come back to them again,” he explained. “The lumps that are left on top after time has gone by, that’s what you make your dough out of.” He added, “It wouldn’t surprise me if we recut them all again. It’s one of those things.”

Instead, “Blue & Lonesome” is a set of a dozen blues songs that were originally recorded, mostly in the mid-1950s, by titans like Howlin’ Wolf, Little Walter and Jimmy Reed. It was the breakthrough era of electric Chicago blues: a modernized, urbanized, amplified update of music from the Deep South. “These guys were basically inventing,” Mr. Richards said. “They had nothing to fall back on. They’d got these new guitars and amplifiers. They were all feeling their way through it. So there’s a feeling about that particular period of the blues which we could identify with, because you could hear the guys egging each other on and wondering where it’s going to go.”

The style was barely a decade old when it changed the lives of the English teenagers who would become the Rolling Stones, along with a generation of musicians worldwide. The rest is rock history, as the blues has been transplanted, revamped, venerated, repeatedly rediscovered and sometimes plundered, with its ideas ricocheting across cultural and geographical divides long before the more recent discussions about cultural appropriation. The blues became one of the foundations of rock, though its influence has been waning in recent decades.

“Sounds have changed,” Mr. Jagger said. “What makes you excited now is not the same. In music, everything’s different. But the blues still have something about them that’s really good. I love all kinds of music, and I still listen to the blues.” The songs for “Blue & Lonesome” were all on his iPod.

Half a century on, playing vintage blues songs is an act of preservation and reclamation — and for the Rolling Stones, who have always been careful to credit their sources, a matter of continuity. “We’ve known these songs for 50 years,” Mr. Jagger said. “It is a learned idiom. It’s like me singing in Italian. If I’d been doing that for 50 years, you wouldn’t ask me, ‘How do you feel about singing in Italian?’ I don’t feel anything about singing in Italian, I always sang in Italian.’ It works most of the time. It’s like, you just have to go with it and suspend disbelief.

“To me it’s a homage to all those people that we’ve always loved since we were kids,” he added. “I can see why people might find it vaguely not correct, but we’ve always done it. And the artists themselves, they never objected.”

“Blue & Lonesome” was recorded nearly a year ago, on the spur of the moment. While planning for recording sessions, Mr. Richards recalled, he emailed Mr. Wood, urging him to learn “Blue and Lonesome” by the Louisiana-born singer and harmonica player Little Walter.

“If Keith says something like that, there’s a reason for it,” said Don Was, the Stones’ longtime co-producer. “I don’t think he meant, ‘Go do this because we’re going to do a blues album.’ More like, ‘Let’s apply the principles of “Blue and Lonesome” to what we’re doing here.’”

The sessions took place in December at British Grove Studios, a West London complex owned by Mark Knopfler of Dire Straits. There, the Stones were recording together in a large open room with a setup generally used to record classical music: a tall, three-armed contraption called a Decca tree, which uses overhead microphones to capture what a conductor hears. (The tree was devised at Decca Records, the Stones’ first label; British Grove also has a vintage Decca mixing console, Mr. Was said.) It was a deliberately old-fashioned configuration: not layering isolated instruments, but demanding an all-or-nothing live approach.

The band was “a little unsure of the studio and the sound of it,” Mr. Richards recalled. So it fell back on the blues. “I looked at Ronnie and said, ‘Let’s put a hold on this new stuff while we try and figure things out and get the room warmed up. O.K.: ‘Blue and Lonesome.’

“And it comes out that suddenly the room’s opened up and the sound is there,” Mr. Richards continued. “And then, ‘That was damned good, man!’ Mick turns around and says, ‘Let’s do Howlin’ Wolf’s “Commit a Crime”’ — and it really just led from there. No preplanning, no real instigation. Suddenly Mick just jumped on this train that he’s so good at.”

Mr. Richards recalled thinking: “Keep rolling, keep rolling! I don’t care how many you do — just catch it while the man’s in the mood.” He laughed. “It just bloody happened. That was the amazing thing and the beauty of it,” he said.

At the end of the first session, the Stones had recorded five songs. “No one said, ‘We should do a blues album,’” Mr. Was said. “It’s like, when a guy’s throwing a no-hitter, you don’t talk to him about it in the middle of the game.”

Still, Mr. Was suggested that Mr. Jagger choose more songs; band members who didn’t know them learned them over a weekend. With further serendipity, Eric Clapton was also at British Grove, doing some mixing, and in the next session he ended up sitting in on two songs, joining the improvisational weave of guitars.

Mr. Richards was happy to, as he said, “Just roll it, decide later what to do with it,” he said. “It was only at the end, when we’d got 12 tracks and Don Was and I were talking together, and Mick was there and he was saying, ‘This is an album. You can’t chop this up.’”

Mr. Wood recalled, “I got a text from Mick saying, ‘The blues tracks are really sounding good.’ And I thought, is this from the Jagger that I know? Because he never, never says that things are happening well.”

Mr. Jagger described the album as “an exercise in sprezzatura” — a term for hiding skillful effort behind seeming nonchalance. “You’ve got to concentrate, but it can’t sound like it’s difficult. And it doesn’t,” he said.

The Stones tucked lifelong blues scholarship behind the kick and yowl of the music. As they delved into individual songs, the band praised the little-known studio musicians who forged the Chicago sound: guitarists like Howlin’ Wolf’s sideman Hubert Sumlin (with whom Mr. Richards shared regular jam sessions) and drummers like Freddy Below and Earl Phillips. “When I was doing my song choices, I was thinking about tempos, moods, keys, different emotions,” Mr. Jagger said. But feel came first. “They’ve still got to blow you away a bit. They’ve still got to be exciting.”

The songs on “Blue & Lonesome” are, deliberately, deep-catalog choices rather than blues-bar war horses. The Jimmy Reed song, for instance, isn’t “Big Boss Man” but the spooky, echoey, melancholy “Little Rain.” From Howlin’ Wolf, Mr. Jagger chose two tales of fierce, comic romantic strife and churning rhythm: “Just Like I Treat You” and “Commit a Crime.” Little Walter’s songs — there are four on the album — fell naturally into Mr. Jagger’s vocal range and gave him a chance to play lots of harmonica.

Many of the songs elude the regularity of 12-bar blues; they add or skip beats, start vocals in unexpected places, lurch and leap. Latter-day blues-rockers have often flattened out those quirks, but the Stones maintain them. “It’s not like rock music or programmed drum music,” Mr. Jagger said. “It pulsates in a very weird way, where each bar is different. And that’s what’s interesting about this kind of music when it’s played properly. It has a swerve, and it has a dynamism about it.”

Mr. Jagger also noted that while the songs were recorded almost entirely in real time, the final mixes were painstaking. “I just looked back at the original records, and we wanted some of these moods,” he said. “Every track is different. We all thought it was going to be easy but it wasn’t.”

Still, after more than a decade between albums, “Blue & Lonesome” may have loosened up the Stones for their own new songs. Sessions for the next studio album are still in progress. “We did things after we’d done this and I’d say, ‘O.K., just play it! It’s only got three chords, just play it, stop thinking about it,’” Mr. Jagger said. “‘Just imagine this is a blues.’”

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Nov 10th, 2016 at 10:14am
Mick Jagger Says the Rolling Stones Have ‘Half an Album’ of New Material


By Jeff Giles November 10, 2016 8:49 AM



Before it evolved into the blues covers set Blue and Lonesome, the Rolling Stones‘ next studio album was supposed to contain new original material. What’s going on with that project, and when will fans be able to hear it?

As the band explained in a new profile piece in The New York Times, the record took a turn when they showed up at Mark Knopfler‘s British Grove Studios. The room they’d booked was outfitted with a Decca tree — basically a tall overhead mic array — and it prompted some conversation about how to best record the new material from an engineering standpoint.

While things were hashed out on the technical front, Keith Richards decided to stay busy by working up a cover of Little Walter’s “Blue and Lonesome” — a song he’d earlier told guitarist Ron Wood to learn as a reference point for what he was hoping to get out of the new material. Describing the band as “a little unsure of the studio and the sound of it,” Richards recalled, “I looked at Ronnie and said, ‘Let’s put a hold on this new stuff while we try and figure things out and get the room warmed up. Okay.: ‘Blue and Lonesome.’”

That impulsive decision inspired singer Mick Jagger, who called up a Howlin’ Wolf song as their next number, and by the end of the day, they had five tracks committed to tape. The end result is a record drummer Charlie Watts describes as “what I’ve always wanted the Stones to do” — but it begs the question of when the band might get around to finishing those new originals.

The answer, it seems, won’t be revealed anytime soon. Jagger told the NYT that they only have “half an album” of material — and Wood hinted that those songs may need quite a bit of time in the studio before they see release.

“It’s like putting it on top of the strainer and seeing what soaks through by the time you come back to them again,” said Wood. “The lumps that are left on top after time has gone by, that’s what you make your dough out of. It wouldn’t surprise me if we recut them all again. It’s one of those things.”


Read More: Mick Jagger Says the Rolling Stones Have 'Half an Album' of New Material | http://ultimateclassicrock.com/rolling-stones-new-material/?trackback=tsmclip

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:05am






The Stones are discussing more shows next year, and they really do intend to work on that album of originals. "There's about 10 or 12 new songs that Mick actually has been cooking up," says Wood, "and Keith's got the odd one, too." Richards suggests that at least some of the songs might be unfinished compositions that date back 15 years or more.











Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Nov 16th, 2016 at 6:48pm



The Rolling Stones' New Blues: Inside Their Roots Revival, Bright Future
Why iconic band took just three days to make 'Blue & Lonesome,' its first album in 11 years


By Brian Hiatt
10 hours ago
September 1965. Charlie Watts steps to a microphone in a smart sport jacket, introducing "one of our favorite numbers" to a packed Dublin theater. The 24-year-old drummer heads back to his modest kit, and the Rolling Stones tumble into Howlin' Wolf's "Little Red Rooster," Keith Richards' duh-dunt-dah-duh riff battling Brian Jones' spiky slide-guitar runs. And a thousand Irish teenage girls greet each Chess Records guitar stab with crescendoing, this-song-is-so-fab shrieks. (Later, the audience will embark on an actual riot, storming the stage, which just makes it a typical Stones tour stop.)

Ten months earlier, the band had somehow managed to push that raw take on 12-bar Chicago blues atop the U.K. singles chart (though U.S. radio refused to play it, suspecting that the lyrics' prowling rooster was not, in fact, a bird). "Little Red Rooster" is apparently still the only traditional blues ever to hit Number One in the U.K. "It's crackers," Mick Jagger says five decades later, on a late-October day in Manhattan, pondering that achievement, recalling those screams. He laughs. "You know, it's crazy. I mean, that was a weirdo thing, 'cause we could've done anything at that time and it would've been Number One. That was the point." He's wearing a white button-front shirt with a subtle blue pattern and teensy black trousers that are probably the same waist size as his checkered pants on that Irish stage 51 years back. He looks his age, sort of, except not at all.


As with all the Stones' early blues recordings, Jagger says that "Red Rooster" was done "out of love." "We were kids," he says, "and we were proselytizing. The Beatles, to some extent, did the same – they talked about the music they loved, which was always, like, soul music." The Stones' music was rooted more firmly in their influences, however, and they went further in honoring them. In May of '65, they strong-armed the U.S. teen TV show Shindig! into hosting Howlin' Wolf himself, with the Stones sitting at the besuited, six-foot-three, 275-pound 55-year-old's feet as he bellowed "How Many More Years," jumping in place and eliciting some improbable adolescent shrieks in his own right. "When those blues records came out," says Jagger, "they were, in a sense, for their audience, pop music. They would play it like we would play Kendrick Lamar. To me, take away the genres for a minute and it's all pop music."

Now, the Stones have circled back to the blues, with Blue & Lonesome, a (mostly) live-in-the-studio collection of 12 songs originally performed by the likes of Little Walter, Jimmy Reed and, again, Howlin' Wolf. It's the first Stones album to have zero Jagger-Richards originals; even their debut had a couple of attempts at songwriting. Recording Blue & Lonesome was easy – it took all of three days. "It made itself," says Richards. As Ronnie Wood points out, however, it's also the product of "a lifetime's research, really."

Figuring out when and how to release it was trickier. "I'm saying to the record company," says Jagger, "'Can you make this pop music if you want? Is it marketable?'" The album came out of sessions that were supposed to be for an LP of Stones originals, still in its early stages. Jagger wondered whether they should wait to get that one finished, maybe release them together.

But then again, the last time the Stones managed to finish a studio album was back in 2005, with A Bigger Bang. "The record company probably said, 'Well, the other one's never gonna come,'" Jagger says, twisting those lips of his into an outsize grin. " 'We might as well put this one out.' I don't blame 'em. I probably would have done the same thing. 'Cause, 'Now I got something, might as well put it out.'"


The freakiest thing about Blue & Lonesome is the extent to which Jagger and Richards agree on it. The two men, currently in their fourth year of détente after some caustic bits in Richards' autobiography nearly derailed a 50th-anniversary reunion, are both genuinely excited about the roots revival. The project might, from the outside, seem more like a Richards thing, the kind of retro move he'd favor, while the Jagger of fans' imaginations would be busy pushing the Stones to work with, say, the Chainsmokers. The frontman says the stereotype isn't all wrong, but that in this case, "we were all equally into it. I was as into it as anyone."

"This is the best record Mick Jagger has ever made," says Richards, always a fan of Jagger's emotive harmonica playing, which flourishes on the new LP. "It was just watching the guy enjoying doing what he really can do better than anybody else." He pauses. "And also, the band ain't too shabby."

Even after their early flurry of covers subsided, the Stones never stopped playing old blues tunes, both onstage and, especially, in rehearsals. The 200 hours of Exile on Main Street sessions, for instance, were punctuated by repeated attempts at covers, meant to clear the air between the midwifing of new songs. Two of them – Slim Harpo's "Shake Your Hips" and Robert Johnson's "Stop Breakin' Down Blues" – made the 1972 album. ("It's like ginger at a sushi restaurant," says Blue & Lonesome co-producer Don Was. "You cleanse the palate.")

In 1968, Jagger told Rolling Stone that the band had always intended to move beyond the blues. "What's the point in listening to us doing 'I'm a King Bee,'" he said, "when you can hear Slim Harpo do it?" But at their best, the Stones weren't merely mimicking their inspirations. They weren't purists, except maybe for Jones; blues fans looked askance at them for playing Chuck Berry tunes at their early gigs. Among early-Sixties R&B hipsters in London, "it was always that sort of reverse psychology," says Richards. "Anybody who had a hit record was a piece of shit."

"You were kind of forced into a purist style because you wouldn't get booked if you were a rock band," Jagger recalls. "So we made out we were blues purists to get booked. The reality is, in rehearsal we would play anything – Ritchie Valens and Buddy Holly."

That irreverence made their take on the blues matter. Their frantic, hand-clappy 1964 version of Muddy Waters' "I Just Want to Make Love to You" owed a lot of its approach to Bo Diddley, a fresh mixture that helped birth garage rock. The Stones didn't get the "Red Rooster" riff right, either, playing it more like Muddy Waters' "Mannish Boy," while also drawing from Sam Cooke's sleek 1963 soul version. (Eric Clapton recalled Howlin' Wolf taking pains to teach him the original version when they rerecorded it for 1971's The London Howlin' Wolf Sessions, with the older man telling him, "It doesn't go like anything you think it goes like.")
And in 2016, Jagger is finally ready to concede that the Rolling Stones have something to add to this music. "The thing about the blues," he says, "is it changes in very small increments. People reinterpret what they know – Elmore James reinterpreted Robert Johnson licks, as did Muddy Waters. So I'm not saying we're making the jumps that they made, but we can't help but reinterpret these songs."

This past December, the Rolling Stones gathered in Mark Knopfler's British Grove Studios in West London to begin work on a batch of original songs. Jagger is deliberately vague on the nature of those tunes. "I hope it's gonna be a very eclectic album," he says. "I hope some of it's gonna be recognizable Stones and some of it's gonna be some Stones you never heard before, maybe."

Knopfler's studio is gorgeous, equipped with an ideal mix of vintage and modern equipment, with high ceilings and gleaming blond-wood floors. It was also a totally alien environment for the Stones. "I know the Rolling Stones," says Richards. "I know that recording new music in a room they're not familiar with, there's sometimes going to be weeks before the room breaks in." So Richards told fellow Stones guitarist Ronnie Wood to learn Little Walter's apocalyptically mournful 1965 B side "Blue and Lonesome" as a potential icebreaker (Wood remembers this suggestion coming in by fax, well before the sessions).

By the second day at British Grove, Richards felt his prediction coming true. "The room is fighting me," he recalls thinking. "It's fighting the band. The sound is not coming." He suggested "Blue and Lonesome," Jagger dug up a harmonica in the right key, and the band barreled through two quick takes. "Suddenly," says Richards, "the room is obeying and there's something happening – a sound is happening and it was so good."

One of those two takes ended up on the album, and it's extraordinary, with Wood playing frantic lead; Richards hitting huge, doom-y chords; Watts nailing the original track's regally restrained drum part; and Jagger digging deep on his harp when he's not delivering one of the least-mannered vocals of his career. "Baby, please, come back to me," he pleads. Afterward, Jagger – who says he had already been pondering a Stones blues album – surprised everyone by calling for more covers. That night, he went to his MP3 collection, returning the next day with more song ideas.

And in keeping with the serendipity of the endeavor, a special guest showed up. On the first day, Eric Clapton happened to be mixing an album of his own at British Grove when he poked his head into the Stones' live room. The guitarist, who had seen the Stones playing blues gigs when he was still in his teens, was taken aback. "Eric walked in, and he had the same reaction that any fan would have," says Was. "He was just gobsmacked at being that close to something that iconic and powerful. There was this great look on his face." They asked Clapton to jam on two songs, and he ended up picking up one of Richards' guitars, a semihollow Gibson, instead of the Strats he's mostly played post-1970 – which helped him reclaim the fat tone of his Bluesbreakers days: You can hear the band applauding him at the end of "I Can't Quit You Baby."

It all happened so quickly and naturally that the band never really discussed what it was doing, or even acknowledged it was making an album. "I didn't even have time to change my guitar," says Wood. "They were coming so thick and fast. It was like, 'OK, let's do it – this one, that one.' Some of the harder riffs were making my fingers bleed, and Mick was going, 'Come, let's do it again, then!' And we'll go, 'Hang on! My fingers!' It was real hard work, but I love it."

For Jagger, it was a chance to indulge his blues-harp habit, a subject that arouses an incongruously geeky enthusiasm in him. "If I had known I was gonna have to do this," he says, "I would have spent a few days practicing, because sometimes I do that, sit at home and play. It's quite easy, really; I mean, you just put on whatever, a whole bunch of Muddy Waters records." (Muddy "Mississippi" Waters – Live, a 1979 LP featuring Johnny Winter, is one of Jagger's favorites for this purpose.)

Jagger's vocals are also striking in their authority. The camp he once brought to the genre is gone, replaced by something darker and deeper, perhaps reflecting the weight of real-life losses. "You can put yourselves inside the songs as a 70-year-old," says Was, "in a way that you couldn't when you were 21, because you hadn't experienced the stuff."

"On some of these, I sound quite old," Jagger counters, "and on some of them, I don't. Some of it sounds like when I was in my twenties doing this stuff. I didn't really mean it to sound like that. I was supposed to be more mature!"


While Muddy Waters was in England in 1966, a journalist asked the then-53-year-old bluesman what he thought about Jagger and the Stones. "He took my music," Waters reportedly said, "but he gave me my name." Technically speaking, of course, Waters gave the Stones their name, via his 1950 single "Rollin' Stone," but he was speaking metaphorically: He likely wouldn't have been playing a big show in London in the first place if not for the Stones.

The Stones never questioned their right to sing and play the blues. What is now considered by some to be cultural appropriation is hardly a sin in their minds, then or now. "I don't think we thought about that," says Jagger, before launching into a lengthy, learned riff on the early days of jazz, when white musicians like Bix Beiderbecke were quickly assimilated into the genre, but "the complaints were really on the fact – and you could level a lot of people with it – that the white people made more money."

Richards has his own answer to the issue. "I'm black as the ace of fucking spades, man," he says, deadpan. "Ask any of the brothers." He continues, "I didn't know what color these people were, as a kid. I don't think of blues as being of any particular color at all. Obviously, its history. But there were white slaves, as well. There have been plenty of work songs from way back. Try Egypt. Quite Jewish, actually. You know, people have been doing this since history began."

In the end, Jagger asks rhetorically, "Has it hurt the music, this influx of foreigners and people from outside of the blues tradition, or has it helped the music? The performers that I spoke to, Muddy Waters, Howlin' Wolf, when they were alive, they thought it had helped. There is an exchange."

Occasional Stones jam partner and Chicago-blues standard-bearer Buddy Guy agrees. "They did so much for all the blues people, especially the black people," Guy says. "They were putting the music where we never had put it before, and they just let the world know who we were. They didn't just come in and say, 'Well, this is new.'"

Even before the Stones, the Chicago bluesmen were supportive of white players – Muddy Waters mentored the harp player Paul Butterfield in the Fifties, for instance. And the Stones grew close to the Chess Records crew, beginning with their pilgrimage to the label's headquarters in 1964, where they were befriended by Waters. (Richards has long maintained that Waters was painting the ceiling when they showed up, which Marshall Chess has denied – but the guitarist is still positive this happened: "Why would I bother to make it up?")

"Muddy made you feel like you were really part of it," says Richards. "He sort of brought you in. And Howlin' Wolf was very much the same. There was none of 'Well, I didn't know white guys could play like that.' We connected, and they were not particularly impressed about what color you happen to turn out to be or whatever. Of course, Muddy and the other guys did recognize that for some reason, the Stones had brought this music back to America and repopularized it. Or not so much popularized it, just brought it to attention again. And for that, I'm eternally proud, and that's probably the only way I'm going to get in heaven." He lets out a long, strangled laugh.

Unlike many blues guitarists, Richards never had much interest in being a lead-playing gunslinger. He was more fascinated by ensemble players like the Myers brothers, who backed Little Walter. "The idea was to make the fucking band slam together," he says. "A quick, short, sharp solo here, boom, great. Otherwise, to me, the fascination has always been that four or five guys can create a sound that sounds a lot larger than the actual number of members actually involved."

Richards is convinced that rock lost its groove, its "roll," distancing itself from its African-American influences, with the advent of the electric bass some 60 years ago. "By the middle Sixties," he says, "you have the worst guitar player in the band playing bass. So he goes plunk-plunk-plunk, and that's a very European thing."

While he's at it, he shares another opinion: "I mean, Jimi Hendrix," Richards says. "Love him dearly. Incredible. He ruined guitar. That whistling saw sound. That's what they say about Coltrane with saxophones. Fantastic player. Unfortunately, he ruined the instrument, because after that everybody growled through it."

In October, as the Stones stepped onto the Desert Trip stage in Indio, California, some thoughts crossed Mick Jagger's mind. "It was 30 meters wider than our normal stage," says Jagger, "which is quite wide, by the way, which I usually run. And I heard that nobody else went out there, apart from me. So what the fuck did they build the stage for?
"Was that just for me? And I was just thinking, 'How long can I fucking do this? How long can I run the hundred-meter stage?' I don't know the answer to that. I mean, as long as I can. And then should I stop performing when I can't run the hundred-meter stage, is that it? Does that mean I have to stop? No one else is using the hundred-meter stage!"

As early as 1986, Richards was suggesting that Jagger simply stand in front of the mic and sing, an idea that sends Jagger's eyes skyward. "That's good advice, Keith," he says, with caustic sarcasm. "Thanks so much. It's very useful. He should stop playing the guitar. I mean, come on! There is some other option besides 'Are you gonna run the hundred meters or are you gonna sit?' You can still move a bit in the middle!"

Though Jagger blames the dusty field for a recent bout of laryngitis – and he originally questioned the idea of a festival of "old, over-70 white English people playing all the same music" – the band had a good time at Desert Trip, treating it as a sort of boomer-rock class reunion. They were all particularly happy to see just-anointed Nobel Prize winner Bob Dylan, who brought onesies for Wood's now-six-month-old twin girls. Wood and Watts asked Dylan how he felt about his honor. "He said, 'I don't know,' " recalls Wood. "'How should I feel? Is it good?' I said, 'You're kidding. We really think it's great and you deserve it.' And Dylan said, 'Do I?'"

Richards is in his manager's SoHo offices, slumped majestically on a brown couch beneath a vintage Stones tour poster. On his feet are the same bright-red Nikes Dylan noticed when the two hung out at Desert Trip: "Nice kicks," Dylan said, to which Richards replied, "I thought you'd never notice."

Richards is wearing a gray overcoat, snug jeans and a T-shirt that reads "Do Not X-Ray." There's a Rasta-style rainbow headband on his forehead and a lit Marlboro in his hand. For the first time in his adult life, Richards has lost his skeletal gauntness. His face is fuller. He looks almost  . . .  healthy. His 2006 head injury meant "goodbye to cocaine," he says. "I was actually fed up with the stuff. I was in a habit." After quitting, he says, "you make up for all the lost meals and all the lost sleep." While Wood has been sober since 2010, and even quit cigarettes for the birth of his daughters, Richards hasn't taken it that far. "I like a drink now and again," he says. "And I do like a nice piece of hash. Or weed. I hear weed is legal!"

He and Jagger do seem to have found some genuine peace. "I love the man," says Richards. "That doesn't mean I can't get pissed off occasionally, and I have no doubt it goes the other way around. But you have to forgive and forget, and also I would say that 89 percent of the time we're in total agreement. But people only hear about the 11 percent, you know, where it flares up. What would the Stones be without it? If you had the perfect machine and everybody in total agreement, you'd probably be fairly bland.  . . .  It's amazing we're both alive. I celebrate Mick's life. He's always five months older than me!"

In his book, Richards complained that he hadn't been in Jagger's dressing room for decades. That hasn't changed, but the guitarist doesn't care. "The fact is, Mick and I really don't want to hang together before we go onstage," he says. "He has a routine of how he gets together for the stage. Me, I have a party."

The Stones are discussing more shows next year, and they really do intend to work on that album of originals. "There's about 10 or 12 new songs that Mick actually has been cooking up," says Wood, "and Keith's got the odd one, too." Richards suggests that at least some of the songs might be unfinished compositions that date back 15 years or more.

They'll all be in New York soon for the opening of Exhibitionism, an elaborate, immersive pop-up Stones museum that includes a reproduction of the squalid apartment shared by Jagger, Richards and Jones circa 1963, and collectibles including the cassette recorder Richards used to demo "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction." While they're in town, Richards is trying to persuade them to do some recording, which may be a stretch. Jagger is positive they'll finish that album, "but I don't know when, because you want it to be really good and everything."

They all share an almost scientific curiosity about their future as a rock band plunging through its sixth decade. Again, how long can this go on? "I think we're as interested to find out as anybody else," says Richards. "But, man, I just got offstage a week ago and we were playing 'Brown Sugar,' and I turned to Charlie Watts and said, 'This time we got it right.'"

At 75, Watts is the oldest band member, and also happens to have the most physically demanding job. Understandably, he struggles with back pain, according to Wood. It's unclear what the Rolling Stones would do without him, and that's a prospect Richards refuses to contemplate. "Charlie Watts will never die or retire," Richards says. "I forbid him to."
Jagger doesn't seem eager to contemplate his own mortality, at least in interviews. But if you remind him that he's convinced everyone he'll live forever, he'll shoot back without a pause: "I'm not going to."

Richards knows exactly how he'd like to go, and he's sure that doctors will want to have "a good look at the liver" when he does. "I'd like to croak magnificently," he says, savoring the prospect. "Onstage."


http://www.rollingstone.com/music/features/inside-the-rolling-stones-new-album-blue-lonesome-w450645?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=daily&utm_campaign=111616_12


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:03pm
So basically the new album of original songs is nowhere near finished, they're hopeful it will see the light of day sometime, its pretty much all Mick compositions and they might have to dig out stuff from around the 'Licks' sessions from 2002 to pad it out.

Ah well.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:25pm

Gazza wrote on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:03pm:
So basically the new album of original songs is nowhere near finished, they're hopeful it will see the light of day sometime, its pretty much all Mick compositions and they might have to dig out stuff from around the 'Licks' sessions from 2002 to pad it out.

Ah well.


Get Keith more involved or forgettaboutit.  :wtf1

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by leonid on Nov 16th, 2016 at 8:51pm

Ian Billen wrote on May 9th, 2016 at 6:47pm:
Folks .. this 'album of blues covers' was all hear-say. Ronnie simply said they recorded a bunch of old blues songs...(along with some new Rolling Stones cuts)  and that the stuff was sounding great. Nothing more.

The December session was simply to get their feet planted and start things rolling studio wise and as a.... 'start'... on working on an album .. that's all it was. It was almost a warm up .. and to work on a hand full of demos brought in ...but they got a healthy dose of new material out of the session just as well. Seems as if they are taking this slow .. and not rushing anything this time (thankfully). They are working on this album in segments  .. that's all. The blues covers was just in warming up and starting things off in there.. that's all.


I am certain we are not getting an album of mostly blues covers. It is a new Rolling Stones album. 



Any news Ian?

:aimama :areyoufuckingserious :wow

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by lavendar on Nov 17th, 2016 at 6:52am

Quote:
Mr. Jagger said. But feel came first. “They’ve still got to blow you away a bit. They’ve still got to be exciting.


This is what THE ROLLING STONES are all about. IMHO

Merry Christmas 12/2/2016

GR8 Reads!


Quote:
Jagger is positive they'll finish that album, "but I don't know when, because you want it to be really good and everything."



Quote:
Keith Richards,.... 'This time we got it right.'"
LOL

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Nov 17th, 2016 at 6:43pm

Edith Grove wrote on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:25pm:

Gazza wrote on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:03pm:
So basically the new album of original songs is nowhere near finished, they're hopeful it will see the light of day sometime, its pretty much all Mick compositions and they might have to dig out stuff from around the 'Licks' sessions from 2002 to pad it out.

Ah well.


Get Keith more involved or forgettaboutit.  :wtf1


After years of minimal contribution to records by a band who had been creatively inactive for a decade, Keith released a pretty decent solo album which took a couple of years to make and which included covers, an aimess doodle as an opening track and original material that dated back as far as 2002 or earlier.

I think its safe to say his cup of creativity doth not runneth over.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Nov 17th, 2016 at 8:01pm

Gazza wrote on Nov 17th, 2016 at 6:43pm:

Edith Grove wrote on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:25pm:

Gazza wrote on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:03pm:
So basically the new album of original songs is nowhere near finished, they're hopeful it will see the light of day sometime, its pretty much all Mick compositions and they might have to dig out stuff from around the 'Licks' sessions from 2002 to pad it out.

Ah well.


Get Keith more involved or forgettaboutit.  :wtf1


After years of minimal contribution to records by a band who had been creatively inactive for a decade, Keith released a pretty decent solo album which took a couple of years to make and which included covers, an aimess doodle as an opening track and original material that dated back as far as 2002 or earlier.

I think its safe to say his cup of creativity doth not runneth over.



.......then lock up Mick & Keith in the kitchen recreation of Edith Grove until they come up with something.

Fly Phelge over here (he's still alive ain't he?) and he can piss on them from the top of the stairs if they don't deliver.  :smilestu

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Nov 17th, 2016 at 8:20pm

Some Guy wrote on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:05am:
"There's about 10 or 12 new songs that Mick actually has been cooking up," says Wood, "and Keith's got the odd one, too.



Am I the only one who thinks that 10-12 songs is actually enough for a release??
This nonsense of trying to fill a 70+ min CD (cd?) is crap in this digital age. That was a model that forced groups to churn out too much filler and plain bad music.

Get back to an album concept and release it...download...or whatever...in other words...10-12 songs!!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Nov 19th, 2016 at 7:07am

Paranoid Android wrote on Nov 17th, 2016 at 8:20pm:

Some Guy wrote on Nov 16th, 2016 at 7:05am:
"There's about 10 or 12 new songs that Mick actually has been cooking up," says Wood, "and Keith's got the odd one, too.



Am I the only one who thinks that 10-12 songs is actually enough for a release??
This nonsense of trying to fill a 70+ min CD (cd?) is crap in this digital age. That was a model that forced groups to churn out too much filler and plain bad music.

Get back to an album concept and release it...download...or whatever...in other words...10-12 songs!!

12 songs is plenty to release for a CD. I don't know about 70 min. But somewhere between 45-60 would be enough.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Nov 20th, 2016 at 12:18pm
That seemed to be the norm by the early 90s when acts seemed to be under the impression that they had to fill a 70 (and later 80) minute CD instead of two sides of a 45-minute LP.

The Stones pandered to that with Voodoo Lounge, partly because they hadnt released an album for five years (no sniggering at the back) and because they did have a LOT of finished songs.  Bigger Bang was much the same.  On the face of it, it sounds nice to get 16/18 songs instead of 10/12 but it makes for uneven albums.  Trim the fat and you get a more satisfying release.

These days it seems that a lot of acts have realised that (as PA says above) that padding out CDs with filler only ends up turning potentially good albums into average albums.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Nov 20th, 2016 at 2:19pm

Gazza wrote on Nov 20th, 2016 at 12:18pm:
padding out CDs with filler only ends up turning potentially good albums into average albums.


Quite true...an AWESOME album of 10-12 decent+ songs turns into mush with the extra weight another 8 less than average songs add to the whole package...its tiring and burdensome to listen to IMO

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Soldatti on Nov 20th, 2016 at 4:58pm

Paranoid Android wrote on Nov 20th, 2016 at 2:19pm:

Gazza wrote on Nov 20th, 2016 at 12:18pm:
padding out CDs with filler only ends up turning potentially good albums into average albums.


Quite true...an AWESOME album of 10-12 decent+ songs turns into mush with the extra weight another 8 less than average songs add to the whole package...its tiring and burdensome to listen to IMO


When you release a new album every 2-3 years, 15-18 songs it's too much, but when you release a new album every 8-12 (!!) years, it's not.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Nov 20th, 2016 at 6:43pm
A fair point

Well, you know the answer to that, then.

Just make more fucking records.

There are three songwriters in the band. All of them accomplished.

How difficult can it be to put out a dozen decent songs every two or three years?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Soldatti on Nov 21st, 2016 at 4:00pm

Gazza wrote on Nov 20th, 2016 at 6:43pm:
A fair point

Well, you know the answer to that, then.

Just make more fucking records.

There are three songwriters in the band. All of them accomplished.

How difficult can it be to put out a dozen decent songs every two or three years?


Nowadays you don't have to put out a dozen of songs: Foo Fighters' latest album had 8 songs, Bruno Mars' recent one has 9 songs, many albums from recent years are 32-36 minutes long with 8-11 songs on it.
Less songs and more albums is the way to go, they can even release a covers album every 1-2 years, sadly the whole 2000-2015 period was a waste of precious time for studio work, 15 years with 1 studio album, unforgettable mistake.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Paranoid Android on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:21pm
They've been doing mini-tours...why not release mini-LPs with each one ( they could just record them at one time)...it's basically what they did with D&G and the other one...and Don't Stop...

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Nov 22nd, 2016 at 1:51pm
Blue & Lonesome is the album any Rolling Stones fan would have wished for – review (5-stars)
 

Neil McCormick, music critic
22 NOVEMBER 2016 • 12:19PM
The Rolling Stones have got the blues. I wonder what took them so long? This is the album any Stones fan could have wished for, on which the Glimmer Twins gleam again.

It is a swaggering, heartfelt blast of dense, deft blues rock, with Charlie Watts swinging on the back beat, Keith Richards spilling slippery chords and magic licks, and Mick Jagger wailing on the blues harp like the last lonely survivor of an apocalyptic flood on the Mississippi delta. Even Ronnie Wood keeps his end up, breaking out crusty riffs and sputtering leads that mesh and weave with Richards’s ever-shifting rhythm guitar, combining in a thick, pliable electric groove that is uniquely the Stones' own.

It is amazing they haven’t made this album before. Holed up in Mark Knopfler’s British Grove studios last December to start work on original material, they warmed up with an old blues cover and just kept going. Knocking out one old favourite after another, they recorded enough for a whole album in just three days.

It is the Stones's first album to completely comprise cover versions. Even their 1964 debut had a trio of originals (some credited to the pseudonymous Nanker Phelge because Jagger and Richards weren’t ready to call themselves songwriters). But this has to be viewed as an overdue act of love, not a retreat to safe harbours.

Being aficionados of the genre, choices are eclectic and immaculate, off the beaten path but straight down the blues line. They rip up Howling Wolf’s Commit A Crime, breathe steamy vigour into Memphis Slim’s Blue and Lonesome and play Magic Sam’s All Of Your Love as if they are down on their knees begging for one last chance at happiness.

There is no attempt to slavishly recreate original arrangements, the modus operandi seems to be to get the chord changes down and then play the damn thing for the sheer thrill of it. And it is a thrill because there are not many bands left who could actually do what they do in a modern studio: just set up, face each other and play with such connection and commitment that the record is essentially a performance so alive to the music it needs no adornment or improvement.

It would be wrong to say that Jagger is a revelation, because we all know what he can do, but it is a pleasure to hear him do it so well. Richards has always loved Jagger’s harmonica playing and here it is almost the featured item, with the singer taking everything he has learned from Little Walter, Howlin’ Wolf and Jimmy Reed and applying it with instinct and emotion. It is as if, unburdened by the self-consciousness that can inhabit his attempts to keep up with the kids, the frontman is free to just enjoy himself.




Jagger has never had a lovely voice, but his phrasing and delivery, his sheer commitment and bravery in going for notes he has absolutely no right to reach is perfectly glorious. He conjures up a dirty, growling old shaman on Otis Hicks's sleazy Hoo Doo Blues whilst on Buddy Johnson’s Just Your Fool, the 73-year-old singer sounds like exactly like the rocking young rooster of yore, only now he’s kicking it with a band of veteran’s utterly at ease and in charge of the material (ably supported in the studio by longstanding live touring members Darryl Jones on bass and Chuck Leavell on keyboards).

If you have seen the Stones on recent tours, you will know they are playing better than at any time since their Seventies glory. The truth is they have never really been outstanding virtuosos but they have the secret to locking tight as a unit and keeping things shifting.

This selection of covers allows them to just do what they do so well and not overthink it. That said, when Eric Clapton guests on two tracks (because he just happened to be mixing in the same studio complex), his nimble, sensitive playing really does switch things up a gear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrIjMzBr-ck


Their raw take on Little Johnny Taylor’s Everybody Knows About My Good Thing is sensational, while Clapton’s soloing on Willie Dixon’s I Can’t Quit You Baby ends with the band breaking out in spontaneous applause. Perennial new boy Ronnie Wood might be getting a bit nervous about job security. The Stones have shown they are not averse to changing the line-up, and he has only been with them 41 years.

Hopefully this will serve as a palette cleanser for the album of originals the Stones are still threatening to eventually deliver. But that would have to go some way to beat Blue And Lonesome for sheer pleasure. It may not be the kind of definitive album statement that will rock the music world to its foundations but it more than demonstrate that the world’s greatest and longest serving rock band have still got what it takes.

The Rolling Stones: Blue and Lonesome is out on December 2




http://www.telegraph.co.uk/music/what-to-listen-to/rolling-stonesblue-lonesome-review/

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Bitch on Nov 22nd, 2016 at 7:56pm
Good reviews so I'm excited for some "new" old material from our "boys" coming out next week! Can someone answer this please ~ is this digitally recorded, because I heard if it is the vinyl wont be worth buying, and, is this fact or fiction?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Nov 22nd, 2016 at 8:31pm
also a cover of current issue of Uncut, available now also on the Uncut APP



http://www.uncut.co.uk/blog/introducing-end-year-uncut-special-98291

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Nov 24th, 2016 at 5:54am
Let's make The Rolling Stones The Greatest Rock and Roll band in the world again.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by andrews27 on Nov 24th, 2016 at 2:21pm
Guardian review:

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/nov/24/the-rolling-stones-blue-and-lonesome-review-covers-album-mick-jagger

Alexis Petridis Thursday 24 November 2016 15.00 GMT

Last week, a US journalist interviewing the Rolling Stones offered up a 21st-century spin on the old ‘Can white men sing the blues?’ argument. Wasn’t the Stones’ early repertoire, heavy on the songs of Willie Dixon, Jimmy Reed, Slim Harpo, Muddy Waters et al, just an example of cultural appropriation, he asked? You might charitably describe Keith Richards’ response as a little confused. At one juncture, he appeared to suggest that the blues was actually “quite Jewish”, but the bulk of the answer consisted of Richards insisting that he was, in fact, black: “Ask any of the brothers.”

Tireless on your behalf, I’ve researched this thoroughly and can exclusively reveal that he isn’t. But equally, the charge of cultural appropriation feels deeply unfair. The biggest band of the British blues boom were always among the loudest cheerleaders for the real deal. They never pulled the grim Led Zeppelin trick of claiming they’d written songs they’d clearly swiped from old blues artists, never missed an opportunity to take BB King on tour or to try to educate their audience about the artists they were paying homage to. “I think it’s about time you shut up and we had Howlin’ Wolf on stage,” suggested Brian Jones to the presenter of US TV show Shindig! in 1965, after the Stones had agreed to appear only if the show also booked Wolf and Son House, a ballsy move in a country where the Voting Rights Act hadn’t yet been passed.

The issue is being raised again because, for the first time in their career, the Rolling Stones have elected to release an album consisting entirely of blues covers. A sceptical voice might suggest it finally confirms what their last album, 2005’s lacklustre A Bigger Bang strongly hinted at: that, as songwriters at least, the Jagger/Richards partnership is out of juice. A less cynical observer’s first thought might be to wonder why they didn’t do something like this sooner: the opening cover of Buddy Johnson’s I’m Just Your Fool comes barreling out of the speakers, sounding more raw and vibrant than the Stones have done in years.

Their second thought might be that Blue and Lonesome sounds surprisingly like Mick Jagger’s show, which rather goes against the commonly held belief that Keith Richards is the band’s R&B heart and Jagger is a fashion-conscious dilettante who’d have the Stones recording tropical house with Kungs and Seeb if he thought it would make them seem relevant. You can see how that notion came about, but while there are fantastic contributions from Richards and Ronnie Wood – the grumbling twin guitars of Little Rain; the taut interplay that powers Hate to See You Go; and, especially, the woozy, chaotic backdrop they conjure on a version of Lightning Slim’s Hoo Doo Blues – it’s Jagger’s voice and harmonica that really drive Blue and Lonesome. At his least inspired, Jagger can sound like a man who isn’t singing so much as rearranging a well-worn series of mannerisms and tics, but here his vocals are extremely powerful and genuinely affecting, as if he’s digging deep within himself to find the emotions to fit the material. You expect him to be able to summon up the kind of swaggering lubriciousness requisite for Everybody Knows About My Good Thing, originally recorded by Little Johnny Taylor, which he does; more surprising is how authentically wracked he sounds on All Your Love, Hate to See You Go and the Memphis Slim-penned title track. There’s a really striking moment on the last one where he sings the line “Baby please come on home to me”, drawing out the word “please” into a chilling, agonised, vulnerable howl.

Moreover, you wonder if Jagger’s fashion-conscious dilettantism might account for the album’s sound: Blue and Lonesome feels very much a record piloted by someone who’s heard the White Stripes or the Black Keys, or the raw blues releases on which Mississippi label Fat Possum’s reputation was founded. The sound is appealingly visceral and live: the guitars are spiky and slashing, the drums punch hard, everything – including Jagger’s voice – is coated with a thin, crisp layer of distortion, as if the band are playing at such volume and with such force that the microphones can’t quite take it.

The obvious point of comparison would be the recordings the Stones made in the brief period between their rise to fame and the full flowering of Jagger and Richards’ songwriting. But if at least one track, a version of Willie Dixon’s Just Like I Treat You, might have slotted neatly onto 5 x 5 or The Rolling Stones No 2, for the most part Blue and Lonesome doesn’t really feel or sound much like the stuff the Stones made half a century ago. They wouldn’t have thanked you for saying it, but back then, their skill lay in a perhaps unwitting ability to transform gnarled rhythm and blues into thrilling teen-friendly pop: listen to Muddy Waters’ original version of I Just Wanna Make Love to You next to their 1964 version and you hear a very grownup, slow-burning record, made by a man already in middle age, converted into something urgent and wired, the soundtrack to an overexcited fumble in the back of a Ford Anglia.

Now in their 70s, men who by anyone’s standards have lived a bit, they frequently seem to tap into something deeper about the music: they really inhabit its sense of hard-won experience. The last thing you hear on the album, after a version of Willie Dixon’s I Can’t Quit You Baby crashes to a halt, is Mick Jagger asking uncertainly “was that OK?” He sounds like a man who’s still slightly awed by this music in its original form; who knows he’s still paying homage to artists he can never entirely grasp, whatever Keith Richards thinks. But the answer to his question is an unqualified yes: it’s more than OK, which is not something you can say about many Stones albums over the last 30 years.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Nov 24th, 2016 at 3:20pm

leonid wrote on Nov 16th, 2016 at 8:51pm:

Ian Billen wrote on May 9th, 2016 at 6:47pm:
Folks .. this 'album of blues covers' was all hear-say. Ronnie simply said they recorded a bunch of old blues songs...(along with some new Rolling Stones cuts)  and that the stuff was sounding great. Nothing more.

The December session was simply to get their feet planted and start things rolling studio wise and as a.... 'start'... on working on an album .. that's all it was. It was almost a warm up .. and to work on a hand full of demos brought in ...but they got a healthy dose of new material out of the session just as well. Seems as if they are taking this slow .. and not rushing anything this time (thankfully). They are working on this album in segments  .. that's all. The blues covers was just in warming up and starting things off in there.. that's all.


I am certain we are not getting an album of mostly blues covers. It is a new Rolling Stones album. 



Any news Ian?

:aimama :areyoufuckingserious :wow




_______________________________

It is sort of odd how many here love to jump when something I said turned out incorrect?

Where was all your insight all along? (it's easy to sit back and wait to see what happens and then call out the people that were wrong or not 100% spot-on lol ..which is all you've made it a point to do here. Anyone can do that lol).

For the record (no pun) they were going to put out an album of originals .. or include the blues covers .. or release it as a double set.

The original material needs cultivated and is not yet ready so they simply are releasing the blues segment as it's own project and album (as wel all now know). However that was definitely not the initial plan (as per Don Was and Keith .. and Mick). They were still debating what to do with or how to handle the new original material (and blues segment) as late as June. They eventually opted to release the blues product on it's own (as we all now know) and work on the new original stuff as it's own seperate project (however all that and the decision itself was still up in the air until early summer).

Now.. if you really want to get technical as far as predictions most here never thought The Stones were going to be in the studio working on new material or another album again at all (I was not one of that group .. were you?).

Now here they are planning and working on releasing not one but 'two' studio albums ..

Anyway .. that's for keeping everyone in check here Leonoid .. We look forward to more of your personal forecasts.


Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Nov 24th, 2016 at 5:29pm
The new Uncut interview is really good. Highly recommend getting it. They cut the new record over 3 days as we know (December 11,14 & 15 to be exact - five songs, six songs and one song on those days).

Jagger opted to concentrate on songs that hadnt been widely covered. Its great to read them all talking with such enthusiasm, reverence and authority about this sort of music -

As for the album of original songs, Don Was says ''to be honest, we dont really have a handle on it yet - the clay is on the table but it doesnt look like President Lincoln yet! What I will say is that for this new album, Mick has played me probably 40 songs that he has been working on, and they really run the gamut...."

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by The Wick on Nov 25th, 2016 at 1:11am
I haven't been this excited about a Stones album forever. The Uncut interviews were great, but my only gripe is that they don't do this more often. There are so many interesting things they could do with this such as have a series of shows in London of only singing the blues like Eric Clapton used to do at the Royal Albert Hall every year (although it wasn't only strictly blues). Having Bill Wyma join the shows would be wonderful. They could take this in so many directions, but they won't. They should take advantage of this momentum and do something like a blues only album of Jagger/Richards originals, but again, I will be dissapointed. Still, I never thought I would get this album and not only have they come through but the first two tracks are dynamite.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Nov 25th, 2016 at 8:33am
If they only have 5-6 decent new tunes then add 4 covers and release it. Finally release Drift Away for instance. Find a rare Motown tune and re-do it...there's lots of options!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Nov 25th, 2016 at 11:15am
OUT NOW! 10"


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by wiseblood on Nov 25th, 2016 at 4:54pm
Anyone get the ridiculously priced RSD 10" (in the US) for a mere $27? 

I'm not touching it.  They want to gouge my wallet like that?  Eff 'em.  I'll stream it.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Nov 25th, 2016 at 5:25pm
I'm  gonna get it. I guess Blue and Lonesome must be their best song. They named it the album.

https://youtu.be/mowOlQqUIhM

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Nov 26th, 2016 at 2:34pm





Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Nov 26th, 2016 at 2:36pm

wiseblood wrote on Nov 25th, 2016 at 4:54pm:
Anyone get the ridiculously priced RSD 10" (in the US) for a mere $27? 

I'm not touching it.  They want to gouge my wallet like that?  Eff 'em.  I'll stream it.


$34 USD @ Amazon, but they have low Price guarantee

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Maxmeister on Nov 26th, 2016 at 4:39pm
I just listened to this track. Awesome. The album is definitely going to be the most enjoyable release since Stripped and VL.
Better this quality album of covers than a half assed Bang and it's possible clone in the future.

Rick

The Stones have got the blues. Dive in.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Nov 26th, 2016 at 7:44pm
:forfucksake :blankfriggingstare1 :blankfriggingstare1 :blankfriggingstare1 :blankfriggingstare1 :blankfriggingstare1 :thatwassmart :thatwassmart :thatwassmart :thatwassmart :spooky :spooky :spooky :spooky


<----- it wasn't me, I didn't give Keith bad acid, I promise you B&B

Keith Richards: I saw Brian Jones' ghost while making new album

http://www.contactmusic.net/keith-richards/news/keith-richards-i-saw-brian-jones-ghost-while-making-new-album_5482578


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Nov 26th, 2016 at 7:49pm
Oh ffs. Contact Music are still around?

They never post anything original. Take a quote from somewhere and use it totally out of context.

Pretty obvious from the original interview in UNCUT that Keith meant it metaphorically.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Nov 26th, 2016 at 8:31pm
Thanks Gazza, based on your commeht I just downloaded the Uncut Issue in the Uncut App and what a great news about Dave Mason hope Steve Winwood joins... you can all join in!

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Ian Billen on Nov 27th, 2016 at 1:11am

Gazza wrote on Nov 26th, 2016 at 7:49pm:
Oh ffs. Contact Music are still around?

They never post anything original. Take a quote from somewhere and use it totally out of context.

Pretty obvious from the original interview in UNCUT that Keith meant it metaphorically.




_______________________________


As you note here .. 'contact music' has always been pretty sketchy ..

Either way .. even if he did say this concerning the new blues release.. It means he was meaning metaphorically .. NOT literally (as you mentioned).

Ian

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on Nov 27th, 2016 at 3:54am
There's no time for dithering, missus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp6QGJUUDzk


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Nov 27th, 2016 at 1:04pm

Gazza wrote on Nov 26th, 2016 at 7:49pm:
Take a quote from somewhere and use it totally out of context.


Now I see... that sells, we have almost 13,000 views in the Facebook page in less than 12 hours. The headline is key to sell LOL, too bad we dion't get a dime from this, but we like it!

:smoking

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Nov 28th, 2016 at 7:22am

Bitch wrote on Nov 22nd, 2016 at 7:56pm:
Good reviews so I'm excited for some "new" old material from our "boys" coming out next week! Can someone answer this please ~ is this digitally recorded, because I heard if it is the vinyl wont be worth buying, and, is this fact or fiction?



I've heard digitally sourced vinyl that sounds great. The big question is what kind of turntable and amp/preamp do you have. That is really where the magic happens.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Unholy Trinity on Nov 28th, 2016 at 5:24pm
Off-Topic replies have been moved to this Topic.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Dec 1st, 2016 at 2:55pm
The Rolling Stones: 'We are theatre and reality at the same time'

The band’s best album in decades is an ‘accidental’ covers collection of songs by their early heroes. Backstage in Boston they talk about playing until they’re dead, Prince opening for them in his knickers and what Bob Dylan really thinks about his Nobel prize


Alex Needham
Thursday 1 December 2016 13.00 GMT

Just over a fortnight before the roof falls in on the US, another institution prepares itself for another phase in its long, checkered and legendary existence. On this Monday afternoon, the Rolling Stones have taken over the Four Seasons hotel in Boston in order to talk about their new album, Blue & Lonesome, and to prepare for the night’s show.

It’s the last of a few American dates including Desert Trip, the California festival that saw them join a bill completed by Paul McCartney, Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Roger Waters and the Who (earning it the nickname Oldchella). Then came two dates in Las Vegas – one of which was cancelled after the desert dust gave Mick Jagger laryngitis. However, tickets are not available for Boston.

“It’s a private show,” Charlie Watts tells me. Is it for someone’s birthday? “They’re usually big corporations,” Watts shrugs. “Elton does loads of them. Elton John at the old piano – he’s perfect for that but we’re really not very good at these things. I mean, people like it, but we’re more used to the huge stage.”

It later turns out that the Stones are playing for Robert Kraft, owner of American football team the New England Patriots, in a tent pitched at the Gillette stadium, rather than the hotel ballroom I’m imagining. “I love playing in clubs, actually,” Charlie Watts says. “These thing aren’t like that, they’re functions. To be honest, it’s what I started out playing.”

As well as finding themselves a band for hire playing parties again – albeit for a businessman worth $5bn, paying them a rumoured $3m – the Rolling Stones are returning to their roots in another way. This week they release Blue & Lonesome, comprising cover versions of old blues deep cuts, mainly by Chicago artists (four by Little Walter and two by Howlin’ Wolf). Twelve tracks long, it’s the first Rolling Stones album to contain more songs by other people than any since their self-titled debut from 1964, the days when they were essentially a blues covers band (their name itself is taken from a blues song, Rollin’ Stone by Muddy Waters).

The way Keith Richards tells it, the album happened pretty much by accident, when the Stones gathered in British Grove Studios in London last December to work on some new material. The sound wasn’t gelling, so Richards told the band to play Little Walter’s Blue and Lonesome. “We cut that, we listened to it back and suddenly the sound is there. Mick turns round and says, ‘I wanna do this Howlin’ Wolf song,’ and then he says, ‘And I’d like to do this Lightnin’ Slim,’ and now I’ve got the man on a roll. When you’ve got the lead man calling the shots and saying, “I want to do that, I want to do this,’ keep the tape rolling.” And they do record on tape, Richards says. “This is not digital crap.”

The band recorded the bulk of the songs in two days. “Maybe Ian Stewart was sending a message from above,” Richards says, referring to the Rolling Stones’ sixth member, kicked out of the band for not having the right look, but who stuck around as their tour manager and pianist until his death in 1985. “It’s almost like getting something off your chest that had been there for a long time. I’m looking forward to volume two already.”

Jagger took more convincing. “At first Mick was a little bit, ‘The blues album? Oh no,’” Richards says. “I said, ‘On this you shine, man. This is Mick Jagger at his fucking best!’” And indeed, Blue & Lonesome has a purposeful swagger that cuts through the showbiz to reveal the Stones as musicians and fans reunited with songs they have known, as Richards says, “since babyhood”.

Jagger isn’t talking – he’s saving his voice – so I interview the other Stones one by one. I meet Watts and Richards in two empty hotel conference rooms; speaking to Ronnie Wood is a cosier experience up in his suite of rooms on the sixth floor. His baby twins Gracie and Alice wriggle in the arms of his wife, Sally Humphreys, while Wood gets stuck into an early evening drink. At 69, does he ever feel that he can’t be bothered to go onstage?

“No, it’s a delight,” says Wood, still regarded as the band’s new boy (he joined in 1975). “As long as we can still do it and each of us in our own departments takes care of that particular thing, as long as Mick is out there selling the song in such a good way, that’s great.”

The world is finally coming to terms with the fact that, like their bluesmen heroes, the Rolling Stones have no intention of giving up performing, more than 50 years after they started. “Howlin’ Wolf almost died on stage, plugged into his kidney machine, so there’s no reason why we wouldn’t go exactly the same way,” Wood says. “I saw John Lee Hooker not long before he died [aged 83, in 2001] and he was showing me backstage, showing off his new CD and his new white hat and his new girlfriend – he was rocking right to the end.”

Those that don’t have the same attitude leave the band. The day I interview the Stones, it’s Bill Wyman’s 80th birthday: Wood, a talented artist, has painted Wyman’s portrait and given it to him as a present. “I know – we’re quite kind sometimes, aren’t we? Even to old members,” chuckles Wood’s manager Sherry Daly, hovering nearby.

Then there are those band members who haven’t lasted the course – not just Stewart, but also Brian Jones, who founded the band and drowned in 1969, aged 27. Since Jones was the band’s blues purist, I ask Watts whether he thought of him while recording Blue & Lonesome. “Nah,” says the drummer. The Rolling Stones could never be accused of being overly sentimental.

“When I was playing the Jimmy Reed one, Little Rain, I was remembering Brian and figuring it out in 1962,” offers Richards. “The guy is not totally obliterated, but don’t forget that we have another Jones in the band now – Darryl” – their bassist, Wyman’s replacement. “And that guy can kick ass, man.”

Richards, dressed in a scarf that trails from around his head to the floor, scarlet hi-top sneakers, and a bracelet that looks as if it’s made from the locks you might use while abseiling, is at pains to disabuse me of the notion that being in the Rolling Stones aged 72 might now be a bit boring compared to their decadent peak. “I’m actually still recovering from a rock’n’roll party,” he says, lighting up a fag (of course, the Four Seasons is a non-smoking hotel). “Cats came to my room, Peter Wolf [of the J Geils Band] came to see me, Darryl Jones comes by, then we start to play some Little Richard shit, then in walks Sasha Allen [who sings back-up with the Stones] and before you know it it’s eight in the morning and I’m, ‘Guys, we’ve got to knock it off here.’ If it was on film it would be hilarious.”

With mild trepidation, I tell Richards that I recently watched a Stones-on-tour documentary – Cocksucker Blues. Made by Robert Frank, it captures the band’s 1972 tour, with scenes including Richards nodding out while watched over by a groupie, an orgy on the band’s private jet, and several lovingly detailed scenes of intravenous heroin use – all reasons why the band have kept it from general release. I think it’s a great film, I tell him. “Me too,” Richards agrees, “Frank really captured some moments.”

I hate to be bourgeois, I say, but I also found it pretty shocking. “Life on the edge,” says Richards. “The monument of the unknown junkie.” He’s referring to a section where one of the Stones’s bombed-out entourage proposes a memorial to an OD victim akin to the tomb of the unknown soldier. “It was a monument to himself I think but the way he put it across was a great idea. It’s the characters that you meet on the road – you’re not in a cocoon, you’re working with people. Danny Seymour, who’s doing the sound on there – all these cats are dead now, man.”

Seymour was Frank’s sidekick, credited as “Junky Soundman”: Cocksucker Blues is nothing if not gonzo. It also captures the mixture of lowlife and high society that was (and perhaps still is) unique to the Rolling Stones’ backstage ecosystem, in which Andy Warhol and Truman Capote swing by the dressing room, alongside Richards’ favoured ne’er-do-wells. “They’re wondering, ‘Is this art or what?’, I’m looking at Andy Warhol thinking, ‘Are you art or what?’” Richards splutters out his famous laugh, which sounds like 60 years’ worth of fags and drugs residue attempting to escape from his chest. “I love the Campbell’s soup can, but I really don’t think it’s the Mona Lisa.”

He isn’t too keen on the work of Roger Waters, either, who was on the bill at Desert Trip. “To me it’s got nothing to do with rock’n’roll. What if he played in daytime?” He laughs. “It’s a light show, for Christ’s sake! But that’s all right, it’s a piece of theatre. I guess what the Rolling Stones are is a little bit of theatre and a little bit of reality at the same time.”

One person the Rolling Stones do rate is Dylan; the Desert Trip shows coincided with him being awarded the Nobel prize for literature. “He kept calling me Sir Ronnie,” Wood says, “and when Charlie walked in he said, ‘And Sir Charlie, too! Everyone from England is a sir, right?’ And we said, ‘Yeah Bob, but it’s not like … it’s really good about your Nobel prize.’ And he went, ‘You think so? It’s good, huh?’ And we said, ‘You deserve it.’ And he said, ‘That’s great – thanks.’ He didn’t really know how to accept it but he thought he had done something pretty good.”

Like Coachella, Desert Trip took place on the same site again the following week. “I did notice that the next week, Bob’s standing up at the piano like Little Richard and he’s got this little flash Nudie shit going down – shit, dog, go for it,” Richards says. “Mick and I were watching Bob’s first set and it sounded good, the band was great, and I said, ‘Mick, notice – very little concession to showbusiness,’ and Mick went, ‘Yeahhh, right.’”The Rolling Stones are far more dependable than Dylan in that regard – every night you get the hits, in a recognisable rendition, with some deeper cuts alternating through the set. Watts, a bone-dry wit in a cardigan who says his preferred listening is “jazz or Radio 3”, is enjoying their late career as a festival band. “Glastonbury was the first one that I said, ‘We don’t want to do that, it’s a load of crap,’ and actually it was very nice. I’d never go to see a band in a bloody field playing – I wouldn’t go to a stadium to see a band either – but Glastonbury and the desert thing were fun.”

“The job never stops changing,” Richards says. “We were playing for 10 years without a soundsystem, that came around 1969. You used to just go up there with your amplifier, plonk, and do the best you can.”

The Rolling Stones’ most notorious gig, was also in California – Altamont, where a decision to allow the Hell’s Angels to act as security guards led to a fan, 18-year-old Meredith Hunter, being stabbed to death by an Angel in front of the stage while the Stones played. Is it true the stage was only 4ft high?

“That was about right, it was pretty low,” Richards says. The collapse of plans to play a free show, a Woodstock of the west, in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park, then at Sears Point Raceway, which would have been a more suitable venue, led to the band choosing at short notice to play the bleak Altamont speedway in the hills, well outside San Francisco. “There were no cops there, the Angels were running the joint and I wouldn’t trust the Hell’s Angels to get me a coke – and I just mean a Coca-Cola, I don’t even mean coke!” snorts the guitarist. “But they were out of it, things got out of hand. Also in ’69 there was that angst in the air, kind of like there is now, but I don’t want to get into that because it ain’t over and it’s not my country.”


Nonetheless, says Richards, the gig often regarded as marking the end of the innocent dreams of the 60s wasn’t all bad. “I think given that there were about half a million people there, I’d say that 499,000 had a good time,” he says. “Which is not bad on the average, you know? And one man died, but a baby was born, so the same number came out as went in. If that hadn’t happened it would have been considered a Woodstock on the coast. All it takes is one sucker with a knife.”


In fact, as Joel Selvin’s book Altamont earlier this year made clear, the event was a pretty much unmitigated disaster from start to finish, as thousands upon thousands of people on bad drugs, rival groups of Angels, a lack of basic facilities and a hippie faith in good nature came together in a perfect storm of disaster. Meredith Hunter was not the only person to die at Altamont. One person trying to reach the site drowned in a drainage ditch; two more were killed when a hit-and-run driver ran them over at the side of an access road to the site.

Altamont alone would have finished off many bands, but not the Rolling Stones. Equally, death claims younger musical peers such as David Bowie and Prince, but the Stones march on. “Prince was a real shock,” says Watts. “Quite young as well.” He points out that Prince had history with the Rolling Stones, playing a disastrous support slot on their 1981 American tour.

“You know that album cover with the knickers?” He means Dirty Mind, from 1980, on which Prince wears black bikini briefs and a flasher’s mac. “Well, Mick and I both loved that album – Keith hated it – and we got him on our show. Of course, being Prince he duly went on in his knickers and our audience booed him off. Which didn’t deter me from liking him.”

Prince’s early albums were a black American take on new wave and rock. The Rolling Stones approached music in the opposite direction: white Englishmen tackling African-American blues, as Blue & Lonesome makes crystal clear. If they were a group starting out now, trying the same thing, they would be accused of cultural appropriation, of stealing someone else’s culture.


“It’s emulating, I don’t think it’s stealing necessarily,” says Watts. “That’s all I’ve ever done. I never learned to play the drums, I used to watch Phil Seaman and listen to Max Roach or Baby Dodds or Louis Armstrong.” Seaman was white and English; the other three were black Americans.

Watts believes that coming from a specific culture is a factor: “I’m never going to play reggae as well as Sly and Robbie or the Barrett brothers” – the last being Bob Marley’s rhythm section. “They’re Jamaican, their aunties used to dance to that when they were children, you know what I mean? It’s where they come from. But you know, Ginger [Baker] is as African as any African when he plays the drums. So was Phil Seaman, actually.”

This is the kind of talk that makes hackles rise, though perhaps not so much among musicians as their defenders in the press or the academy. When the Rolling Stones actually went to Chess studios in 1964 – when Muddy Waters was doing jobs around the studio – and 1965, the bluesmen welcomed these skinny, white Englishmen with open arms.


“Those blues people had a lot of heart, they reminded me of the art school crowd and my dad and mum’s drinking pals from the pubs – they were all warm people,” says Wood. “When I was up in my mum’s little council house with my first little Dansette player, I used to learn the riffs, and when you meet with these guys later on they were as much of a delight to play with. They were all a bit sad that they got ripped off, they all had that in common, but they certainly didn’t let it get them down that much.”

“If we’re playing a Muddy Waters song and it sells 10m and Muddy sells 1m, I can see that his descendants would be angry about that,” Watts says. “Even if you gave all the money back I don’t know whether the situation would be any better. All you can say is that you admire whoever it is. I mean, I owe my living to Freddie Below. I do. That’s who I copied.” The consummate blues drummer, Below’s playing drove many of the records the Stones have covered on Blue & Lonesome.

“Music’s a bit like poetry or something,” Watts continues. “Once it’s recorded it’s anyone’s. You could be an Israeli that can’t speak English and play as well as Roy Haynes [the great jazz drummer]. What they call world music on the BBC is full of that. You’re suddenly going, ‘Bloody hell, who’s that?’ and it’s some guy from Tashkent. Because they listened to the record, you know?”

Blue & Lonesome suggests that 50 years on, the Rolling Stones are in the astonishing position they are today because they also listened to some records. Yet they made plenty that were equal to – or surpassed – their inspirations. Will we ever hear more Stones originals? So Wood claims: “In 2017 we’ll shape up these news songs – we’ve got some in the can and then there’s a lot more on the back burner.”

In the meantime, the Stones corporation adapts for a new era, though Wood disputes that description. “What do they call the farmers with the little dairies – home farms?” A cottage industry? “Cottage! That was the word I was looking for. I was just talking about this cottage industry, the Rolling Stones.”


• This article was amended on 1 December 2016. An earlier version said that Brian Jones had died at the age of 26.




https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/dec/01/keith-richards-rolling-stones-blue-and-lonesome?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Dec 1st, 2016 at 3:46pm
Todays youth may like this.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Dec 1st, 2016 at 4:27pm

Some Guy wrote on Dec 1st, 2016 at 3:46pm:
Todays youth may like this.


Today's youth wouldn't know what to do with it.



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Some Guy on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 6:15am
If Blue and Lo'  is what we get from them working on new songs, this is gonna get real good.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 8:54am
https://youtu.be/qEuV82GqQnE

Blue & Lonesome is out now! Watch the new video for Ride ‘Em On Down starring Kristen Stewart



Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by gimmekeef on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 9:13am

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 8:54am:
https://youtu.be/qEuV82GqQnE

Blue & Lonesome is out now! Watch the new video for Ride ‘Em On Down starring Kristen Stewart


Nice car...loved the jeans too!.....rollicking Stones what's not to like.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 6:47pm
The cover of the Mexican version is different... Image courtesy of Rogerriffin


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by andrews27 on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 7:14pm

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 8:54am:
https://youtu.be/qEuV82GqQnE

Blue & Lonesome is out now! Watch the new video for Ride ‘Em On Down starring Kristen Stewart


One hell of a Miley Cyrus impression.

Title: Re: Blue & Lonesome - Released Dec. 2, 2016 - Your Verdict
Post by Edith Grove on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 3:50pm
The Rolling Stones' new blues album is an amplified death wheeze. And it rules


http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/la-et-ms-rolling-stones-blue-and-lonesome-review-20161202-story.html

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Dec 3rd, 2016 at 6:30pm
Mick and Keith will be interviewed on CBS' "Sunday Morning" , broadcast in the US tomorrow (4th December) at 9 am.

Some more on it here :

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/rolling-stones-keith-richards-there-are-times-on-stage-when-i-feel-immortal/

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Dec 3rd, 2016 at 6:46pm

Gazza wrote on Dec 3rd, 2016 at 6:30pm:
Mick and Keith will be interviewed on CBS' "Sunday Morning" , broadcast in the US tomorrow (4th December) at 9 am.

Some more on it here :

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/rolling-stones-keith-richards-there-are-times-on-stage-when-i-feel-immortal/


If those pics are from the CBS broadcast, it looks like they were interviewed separately.

When was the last time they were formally interviewed together ?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Dec 4th, 2016 at 11:54am
Pre-Todgergate, I would guess.

In fact, I would say that the number of interviews in the last 15 years where theyve been interviewed together could be counted on one hand.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Dec 4th, 2016 at 12:24pm

Gazza wrote on Dec 3rd, 2016 at 6:30pm:
Mick and Keith will be interviewed on CBS' "Sunday Morning" , broadcast in the US tomorrow (4th December) at 9 am.

Some more on it here :

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/rolling-stones-keith-richards-there-are-times-on-stage-when-i-feel-immortal/

http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/rolling-stones-return-to-their-roots/

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Gazza on Dec 4th, 2016 at 2:21pm
Good interview.

Mick has "tour hair".

Loved Keith's quip about wanting a Nobel Prize for Chemistry.

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by sweetcharmedlife on Dec 4th, 2016 at 5:22pm

Gazza wrote on Dec 4th, 2016 at 2:21pm:
Good interview.

Mick has "tour hair".

Loved Keith's quip about wanting a Nobel Prize for Chemistry.

Even better was his quip about coming back as a frog in his next life.....Which quickly set off a series of memes on facebook. :wtf1 :willya

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Dec 4th, 2016 at 5:27pm

Voodoo Chile in Wonderland wrote on Dec 2nd, 2016 at 8:54am:
https://youtu.be/qEuV82GqQnE

Blue & Lonesome is out now! Watch the new video for Ride ‘Em On Down starring Kristen Stewart


Hey Kristen... wanna play Panic Room with Voodoo?

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Dec 5th, 2016 at 8:33pm
Lovely


Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by FPM on Dec 7th, 2016 at 2:04am
Nice review from the Sacramento Bee:

http://www.sacbee.com/entertainment/music-news-reviews/article119303843.html

The Rolling Stones go home to the blues with ‘Blue & Lonesome'


By Randy Lewis

Los Angeles Times
My feed

When the Rolling Stones fell in love with American blues music as teenagers in England in the late 1950s and early ’60s, the grand old men of the genre they idolized were 20 to 30 years their seniors.

Muddy Waters was in his late 40s and Howlin’ Wolf was about 50.

Now that the Stones themselves are wizened veterans, they are bringing a lifetime’s worth of experience to bear in their homage to their youthful heroes in “Blue & Lonesome,” the first full-fledged blues outing for the group often called “The World’s Greatest Rock & Roll Band.”

And to hear Mick Jagger and Keith Richards talk about it, you get the impression it feels to them like the difference between then and now is barely the blink of an eye.

“In a way it reminds me of 1962,” Richards, 72, said in an interview from his home in Connecticut.

“On the other hand, we probably play them a little different now, probably with more confidence,” he said. “We have the sound down better now. When we started in England, there wasn’t anybody who knew how to record this stuff, so that took quite a while to organize. It was only when we came to America and got into American studios that we really started to hit our stride.”

Added Jagger, 73, in a separate interview from London ahead of the album’s Dec. 2 release, “The hopeful thing, the surprising thing is that it still retains that enthusiasm – that’s the thing that’s the same, the enthusiasm you’ve got for the music.”

The dozen tracks that make up “Blue & Lonesome” were recorded relatively quickly over three days a year ago in London. Early reviews have been enthusiastic. They point to the lived-in authenticity the Stones invest in the songs, and the appropriately gritty, down-and-dirty sound created by Jagger, Richards, drummer Charlie Watts and guitarist Ron Wood with the help of longtime Stones producer Don Was.

The album is one key element of a particularly busy fall for the group.

Along with the Stones’ back-to-back weekend performances in October for the Desert Trip classic rock superstar blowout in Indio, there was also the U.S. opening on Nov. 12 of “Exhibitionism,” a major exploration in New York of the band’s 50-plus year career, as well as the home video release of the “Havana Moon” album and DVD documenting the group’s massive free show in Cuba in March.

“Blue & Lonesome” grew out of the band’s habit of warming up by running through the songs they’d loved as aspiring musicians, when they were lapping up every lick of Southern-drenched, Chicago-incubated blues they could get their hands on across the Atlantic Ocean.

Indeed, the band’s formation story is now part of rock legend. Richards first made contact with Jagger when he spotted the future lead singer in a train station carrying albums by Muddy Waters and Chuck Berry. Suddenly, Richards found himself a comrade in American roots music.

“I threw the idea around the last couple of years with Don Was,” Jagger said. “Every time we rehearse we always do some blues songs, and I thought we should record them, then put out an album. When you’re rehearsing you tend to be relatively relaxed. You don’t have any pressure, so sometimes these things sound really good, because there are no engineers saying ‘Let’s try another take.’ You just do it.

“I don’t think it was on the menu of anyone,” he said. “It was completely out of the blue, and so we just picked up and it sounded good. The first one sounded good, and then the second one sounded good, and pretty soon I thought, ‘I see what’s going on here.’ The thing is, you get kind of lucky sometimes, and when you’re in that lucky space, you just want to stay there.”

Instead of simply using the blues numbers as musical muscle flexing, they devoted their full attention to seriously digging in for three days. Jagger took it on himself to compile lists of songs to consider, which he said were offered up as the sessions unfolded. If someone objected, he said, he’d just move on to the next song on the list until consensus was reached.

“Obviously I feel completely different than I did then,” he said. “But in a way it’s still the same thing. I don’t think you can think about your life experience while you’re doing it. You’re just doing the tune. I’m just being an interpretive singer – that’s my gig. So when we say ‘OK, we’re going to do (Little Walter’s) ‘Just Your Fool,’ I’m just trying to interpret it as well as I can.”

The focus is by and large on Chicago blues, and on songs recorded by artists signed to the Chess and Checker labels of pioneering blues record execs Leonard and Phil Chess. Four are associated with harmonica player Little Walter (Jacobs), two with bassist-songwriter-producer Willie Dixon and the rest with the likes of Howlin’ Wolf, Lightnin’ Slim, Jimmy Reed, Magic Sam and, the most recent, “Everybody Knows About My Good Thing,” originally recorded in 1971 by Little Johnny Taylor.

One of the realizations out of the experience, Richards said, “It’s the recall on everything we did. It was automatically there, you didn’t have to do any memory searching, it just sort of flowered, and I just let it roll. Mick’s playing great harp and doing great vocals. The arrangements stuck pretty close to the originals. It just arrived, there was no planning – we just kicked it off and got into it.”

Richards is famous for saying it’s the roll in rock ’n’ roll that’s more important than the rock. The same appears to hold true in the Stones’ approach to the blues. “There’s a lot of roll on this – thanks to Charlie Watts and Darryl Jones, who played lovely bass on this. I love my rhythm section.”

The sessions allowed Jagger to immerse himself in playing blues harp.

“Playing for three days in a row – that’s not what I normally do,” he said. “You get more confident with it, and in a studio, you can really hear what you’re doing. When you play harmonica with a rock band on a stage, it’s hard to heard the nuances” he said with a laugh. “That’s an instrument that you need to actually hear what you’re doing. You can’t see the keys, and you have to bend the notes to get the notes you’re trying to get. If you can’t hear it, you really don’t know if you’re hitting it.”

Likewise, he felt liberated in his singing by the concentrated time with the vintage songs. “There are things I can attempt now that I wouldn’t have attempted before. It’s all the blues, but there are a lot of different styles. Compare (Lightnin’ Slim’s) ‘Hoodoo Man Blues’ to (Otis Rush’s) ‘I Can’t Quit You Baby,’ they are totally different vocal stylings.”

If there’s a common thread for Jagger, it was the effort to bring a sonic unity to the varied vocal expressions, instrumental combinations, rhythmic grooves and lyrical narratives of the songs.

“The whole thing about this particular kind of sound for this record was trying to get as cohesive a sound on everything where you’re not picking out star performance in a way,” he said.

“That’s the essence of some of those Chess songs,” he added. “You can make counter-arguments – that Hubert Sumlin jumps out of some of those Howlin’ Wolf records. But on a lot of them you can’t discern who’s playing what or what kind of instrument it is until you really listen.

“My thinking on the mixing of it was to re-create some of those things,” he said. “You’re hearing the sound of a band; sometimes you can’t figure out if it’s Keith or Ron who’s playing the solo, or who’s playing the rhythm part. It’s not a wide stereo – it’s a very narrow stereo, and with the amount of distortion it sounds like this one ball of fire.”

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/entertainment/music-news-reviews/article119303843.html#storylink=cpy

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Voodoo Child in Wonderland on Dec 7th, 2016 at 2:38pm
Stones-content stand-stills from the video of "Ride 'em on down" featuring my new girlfriend Kristen Stewart






























Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Edith Grove on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:24pm
Rolling Stones producer says band is recording in 'little bursts’


http://www.kshe95.com/news/real-rock-news/rolling-stones-producer-says-band-recording-little-bursts

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on Mar 11th, 2017 at 2:21am
It would be splendid if, esp groove & guitar wise, some of any potential all-new Stoonz album sounded as lovely as this...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB5gtnSVYpY

Does anyone know if KR's rhyme with "They shoot it from the hip", towards the end of the ditty, is (1) "I'm going to play the fish" or (2) "I'm going to play the fist"?







Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by Steel Wheels on Mar 11th, 2017 at 6:05am
Plead the fifth.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=plead%20the%20fifth

Title: Re: Post New Stones Album Info Here:
Post by WaiteringOnAFiend on Mar 11th, 2017 at 7:02pm
Thanks & Bests

ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.